Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Government at a Glance 2017
Country Fact Sheetwww.oecd.org/gov/govataglance.htm
Government employment as a percentage of total employment in Japan is the lowestamong OECD countries, around 6%
This share has also been quite stable since 2007. Over 85% of staff is employed at sub-central level, which indicates a high level of decentralisation of public administrations. Representation of women in central ad-ministration is the lowest among OECD countries (18%). Women only account for 3% of senior and middle managers whereas the OECD average is 33%. 16% of the staff in central public administration has at least 55 years old, which is significantly lower than the OECD average (24%).
Chapter 3. Public employment and pay
Employment in general government as a percentage of total employmentDistribution of general government employment across levels of governmentShare of women in senior management positions in central governmentPercentage of central government employees aged 55 years or older
Japan is among the leaders on open government data policies among OECD countries
Governments gather large amounts of information as part of its administrative duties. Some of that informa-tion can be put to use not only to improve the organizational efficiency of the government itself, but also to create value-added in private sector, foster innovation and empower citizens’ decision-making. According to the OURdata index, Japan has the third highest score on the availability, accessibility and re-use of public sector information, after Korea and France, which reflects how the country is moving forward in adapting its technological capabilities to satisfy the growing demand for information.
Chapter 10. Open government
Open-Useful-Reusable Government Data Index (OURdata)
Japan has introduced spending reviews to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of public expenditures
Spending reviews assess the scope, scale and impact of government spending, and therefore are an important tool of fiscal management. Between 2008 and 2016, Japan has carried out six government spending reviews. These are led by outside government experts who assess the effectiveness of government programs.
Chapter 5. Budgeting practices and procedures
Frequency and scope of spending reviews
Japan
Fiscal balance*(2015)
Government expenditures(2015)
Government gross debt*(2015)
% of GDP % of GDP % of GDP
Source: OECD National Accounts Source: OECD National Accounts
G@G /dataG@G /data
26134,500
88,70052,700
Middle Managers(D3 positions)
Senior Managers(D1 positions)
SeniorProfessionals
SecretarialPositions
2015USD PPP
150,000
300,000
450,000
231,500
n.a.
Japan
n.a.
maximum150,300
maximum247,400
entry111,900
entry217,900
Annual compensation across central government positions (2015)
Government investment(2015)
How to read the figures:
Japan
Country value in blue (not represented if not available)
Average of OECD countries in red
Range of OECD country values in grey
Public Finance and Economics
10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
24.9%16.3%
Japan
20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
40.9%39.4%
Japan
0% 2% 4% 6% 8%
3.2%3.9%
Japan
221.8% 100%
0%
100%
0%
Japan
112%
100% 150% 200% 250%50%0%
Values have been rounded. n.a. refers to
data not available
% of GDP
Public Employment
Source: OECD (2016) Survey on the Composition of the workforce in Central/federal Governments
Source: OECD (2016) Survey on the compensation of employees in central / federal governments
... and in senior positions (2015)
Source: OECD* See Notes National Accounts
Source: OECD* SNA definition, see Notes National Accounts
Public Sector Compensation
53.0%17.6%Japan
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
32.4%3.1%Japan
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Women in the civil service ...
Source: OECD (2016) Survey on the Composition of the workforce in Central/federal Governments
Percentage of central government employees aged 55 years or older
(2015)
General government employmentas % of total employment (2015)
18.1%
5.9%Japan
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
Source: OECD National Accounts
-10% 0%-5% +5% +10%
-2.8%
-3.5%Japan
Budgeting
Women in Government
Extent of delegationof HRM practicesin line ministries
0.580.64
Extent of the useof performance
assessmentsin HR decisions
0.68
0.64
Extent of the useof performance
related pay
1.00
0.66
Use of separateHRM practices
for seniorcivil servants
0.500.55
Collectionof administrative
data
0.50
0.68
Composite indexfrom 0 lowest to 1 highest
0
0.25
0.50
0.75
1
Japan
G@G /data
Source: OECD (2016) Strategic Human Resources Management Survey
Composite indicators on HRM practices in central government (2016)
Human Resource Management
Composite indices on regulatory governance for primary laws*(2014)
G@G /data
Regulatory governance
0% 10% 20% 30% 40%
29.1%
50%
41.2%
Japan
Source: OECD National Accounts
General governmentprocurement expenditures
(2015)% of government expenditures
Public Procurement
Support for greenpublic procurement
Some procuring entities have developed an internal strategy/policy
A strategy/policy has been developed at a central level
Support forSMEs
Support for innovativegoods and services
A strategy/policy has been rescinded
There has never been a strategy/policy in place
11 25 1 0 8 24 0 1 9 19 0 6
Japan
Strategic public procurement - Objectives(2016)
Source: OECD (2016) Survey on Public Procurement
* See Notes Source: OECD Indicators of Regulatory Policy and Governance (iREG)
0.41
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0.32Japan
Composite indexfrom 0 lowest to 1 highest
Performance budgetingpractices at the central level
of government (2016)
Source: OECD (2016) Survey of Performance Budgeting
Stakeholderengagement in
developing regulations
0.71
2.09
Regulatory ImpactAssessment for
developing regulations
1.39
2.05
Ex post evaluationof regulations
1.00
1.54
Composite indexfrom 0 lowest to 4 highest
0
1
2
3
4
Japan
Notes Fiscal balance as reported in the System of National Accounts (SNA) framework, also referred to as net lending (+) or net borrowing (-) of government, is calculated as total government revenues minus total government expenditures. Regulatory governance indicators: The results for stakeholder engagement and Regulatory Impact Assessment apply exclusively to processes for developing primary laws initiated by the executive. Data is not applicable to the United States, where all primary laws are initiated by Congress. In the majority of countries, most primary laws are initiated by the executive, except for Mexico and Korea, where a higher share of primary laws are initiated by parliament/congress (respectively 90.6% and 84%). Government gross debt is reported according to the SNA definition, which dif fers from the definition applied under the Maastricht Treaty. It is defined as all liabilities that require payment or payments of interest or principal by the debtor to the creditor at a date or dates in the future. All debt instruments are liabilities, but some liabilities such as shares, equity and financial derivatives are not debt.
Open Data Digital Government
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
35.6%n.a.
Japan
Individuals using the Internet for sending filled forms via public authorities websites
in the past 12 months (2016)
Source: OECD, ICT database; and Eurostat, Information Society database
OURdata Index:Open, Useful, Reusable Government Data
(2017)Composite index: from 0 lowest to 1 highest
Source: OECD (2017) Survey on Open Government Data
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.80
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.55
Japan
Dataavailability
Dataaccessibility
Governmentsupportto re-use
Differences in income inequality pre and post-taxand government transfers (2013)
Japan
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6Higher
inequality
Lowerinequality
Before After
0.49
0.33taxes and transfers
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
Before After
0.47
0.32taxes and transfers
Higherinequality
Lowerinequality
Source: OECD Income Distribution Database
Limited government powers (2016)
0.75
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
0.74Japan
Source: The World Justice Project
Core Government ResultsSatisfaction and confidence across public services
(2016)
70%
Judicial system Education system
71%20
40
60
80
100
Health care
67%60%55%68%
National government42%36%
Japan
Average
Range
Police77%74%
Source: Gallup World Poll
% of citizens expressing confidence/satisfaction
Government at a Glance 2017Government at a Glance provides readers with a dashboard of key indicators assembled with the goal of contributing to the analysis and international
comparison of public sector productivity and performance. Indicators on government revenues, expenditures, and employment are presented,
alongside key output and outcome data for education, health and justice. Information on key enablers to increase productivity including on digital
government, budget procedures, strategic human resource management, open government data and innovative practices are also included. In
a context of tight budget constraints in many member countries, good indicators are needed more than ever, in order to help governments make
informed decisions regarding resource allocation and to help restore confidence in government institutions.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/gov_glance-2017-en
The Excel spreadsheets used to create the tables and figures in Government at a Glance 2017 are available via the StatLinks provided throughout the publication:
For more information on the data (including full methodology and figure notes)and to consult all other Country Fact Sheets: www.oecd.org/gov/govataglance.htm