Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
BR
COUNTRYPROFILE BRAZIL
IMD World Competitiveness Yearbook 2020, Digital 2020, Talent 2019: summaries
WORLD COMPETITIVENESSRANKING 2020
All data are available from theWorld Competitiveness Online.
Visit our eShop
BASIC FACTSCapital
Land area (square km '000) 8,5162019
Exchange Rate (per $) 3.9442019
Population - market size (millions) 210.152019 5
Gross Domestic Product (GDP) (US$ billions) 1,839.82019 9
GDP (PPP) per capita (US$) 16,5622019 53
Real GDP growth (%) 1.12019 48
Consumer price inflation (%) 3.732019 53
Unemployment rate (%) 11.902019 58
Labor force (millions) 106.072019 5
Current account balance (% of GDP) -2.692019 50
Direct investment stocks inward ($bn) 684.22018 12
Direct investment flows inward (% of GDP) 4.272019 9
PEER GROUPS RANKINGSTHE AMERICAS (9 countries) POPULATIONS > 20 MILLION (29 countries)
COMPETITIVENESS TRENDS - OVERALL
BRAZILOVERALL PERFORMANCE (63 countries) Rank
Brasilia
CHALLENGES IN 2020Modernizing and improving the quality of infrastructure and
logistics.
Fundação Dom Cabral, Innovation and Entrepreneurship Center
COMPETITIVENESS LANDSCAPE
5761 60 59
56
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
44
59
28
56
38
63
38
60 59 62 61
47
3539
4754 54
41 40
63
Dom
estic
Eco
nom
y
Inte
rnat
iona
l Tra
de
Inte
rnat
iona
l Inv
estm
ent
Empl
oym
ent
Pric
es
Publ
ic F
inan
ce
Tax
Polic
y
Inst
itutio
nal F
ram
ewor
k
Busi
ness
Leg
isla
tion
Soci
etal
Fra
mew
ork
Prod
uctiv
ity &
Effi
cien
cy
Labo
r M
arke
t
Fina
nce
Man
agem
ent
Prac
tices
Att
itude
s an
d V
alue
s
Basi
c In
fras
truc
ture
Tech
nolo
gica
l Inf
rast
ruct
ure
Scie
ntifi
c In
fras
truc
ture
Hea
lth a
nd E
nvir
onm
ent
Educ
atio
n
Economic Performance Government Efficiency Business Efficiency Infrastructure
8 8 87 7
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
2628 28 27 26
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
• Modernizing and improving the quality of infrastructure and logistics.
• Improving innovation capability and developing knowledge-intensive sectors.
• Restoring stability and confidence in the political environment.• Improving the educational system quality, looking for better
labor productivity.• Making the trade bureaucracy and tax regulations more efficient.
Provided by:Fundação Dom Cabral, Innovation and Entrepreneurship Center
IMPROVEMENTSWCY 2019
WCY 2020 DECLINES
WCY 2019
2.4.12 New business density 0.1 1.3 2.3.08 Exchange rate stability 0.066
2.1.11 Pension funding 1.47 3.96 1.2.02 Current account balance -0.78
2.1.09 Public finances 2.25 4.36 1.1.18 Gross fixed capital formation - real growth 4.13
2.3.02 Cost of capital 1.94 3.70 1.1.15 Real GDP growth per capita 0.38
1.4.04 Employment - long-term growth -6.48 -0.90 4.3.16 Patent applications per capita 3.61
2.3.13 Bribery and corruption 1.08 1.99 1.2.17 Export concentration by partner 49.5
2.3.12 Bureaucracy 0.79 1.42 4.1.04 Access to water 5.61
4.4.04 Health infrastructure 2.14 3.21 1.1.19 Resilience of the economy 5.03
2.4.02 Protectionism 2.99 4.14 1.2.08 Exports of goods ($bn) 239.68
3.2.21 Brain drain 3.35 4.49 1.2.18 Export concentration by product 46.3
3.3.19 Corporate debt 3.80 5.03 1.2.09 Exports of goods (%) 12.83
2.3.11 Transparency 2.84 3.75 2.3.07 Foreign currency reserves per capita 1,791
2.4.13 Creation of firms 2.49 3.24 4.1.20 Electricity costs for industrial clients 0.125
3.3.08 Stock markets 4.47 5.76 3.2.10 Employee training 5.06
4.5.15 Primary and secondary education 2.13 2.74 2.4.09 State ownership of enterprises 4.39
COMPETITIVENESS EVOLUTION & ATTRACTIVENESS INDICATORS
BRAZILCOMPETITIVENESS EVOLUTION
0.232
3.29
53.7
5.15
4.63
222.64
49.1
4.85
The criteria below highlight the 15 biggest Improvements and the 15 biggest Declines in the overall performance of the economy. They are
determined by the largest percentage changes in the value of each criterion from one yearbook to the next.
WCY 2020
4.23
KEY ATTRACTIVENESS INDICATORSFrom a list of 15 indicators, respondents of the Executive Opinion Survey were asked to select 5 that they perceived as the key
attractiveness factors of their economy. The chart shows the percentage of responses per indicator from the highest number of responses
to the lowest.
-2.69
2.24
0.34
12.10
1,698
0.131
3.8%6.9%9.2%9.2%10.0%11.5%13.8%24.6%32.3%36.2%38.5%43.1%43.1%69.2%77.7%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%
Competitive tax regimeReliable infrastructure
Competency of governmentStrong R&D culture
Policy stability & predictabilityEffective legal environment
High educational levelEffective labor relations
Access to financingQuality of corporate governance
Business-friendly environmentCost competitiveness
Skilled workforceDynamism of the economy
Open and positive attitudes
WORLD COMPETITIVENESSDIGITAL RANKING 2020
All data are available from theWorld Competitiveness Online.
Visit our eShop
Alpha AlphaLabelBeta BetaLabel Gamma GammaLabel1 2 2 2 2 2 24 4 4 2 2
6.5 4 4 2 28.5 4 4 2 211 4 4 2 2
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
54 55 57 57 51
54 55 62 59 57
54 55 55 57 57
49 44 47 43 43
OVERALL
Future readiness
PEER GROUPS RANKINGS
THE AMERICAS (9 countries) POPULATIONS > 20 MILLION (29 countries)
COMPETITIVENESS & DIGITAL RANKINGS
Technology
DIGITAL TRENDS - OVERALL
BRAZIL
OVERALL PERFORMANCE (63 countries)
OVERALL & FACTORS - 5 years
Knowledge
54 5557 57
51
57
61 6059
56
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Digital
Competitiveness
5 5 6 5 4
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
22 23 24 2420
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
57 62 61 27
57 52 58 5051
43 39 41 48
Knowledge Talent Training & education Scientific concentration
Technology Regulatory framework Capital Technological framework
Future readiness Adaptive attitudes Business agility IT integrationThe direction of the triangle indicates the performance change from the last year: improved or stabledeclined
Overall Factors Sub-Factors
N.B. This graph provides only a comparison of the country’s performance in the two rankings.
u Overall top strengths
w Overall top weaknesses
Subfactors 2016 2017 2018 2019 202059 60 61 61 62
49 48 57 59 61
43 44 54 44 27
Talent Rank Rank Rank
Educational assessment PISA - Math 55 w 59 31 International experience 56 u 9 44 Foreign highly-skilled personnel 57 56 u 8w Management of cities 59 46 u 9w Digital/Technological skills 60 55 40 Net flow of international students 41 51 46 u 14
Subfactors 2016 2017 2018 2019 202058 60 59 57 52
54 56 56 61 58
47 48 47 47 50
Regulatory framework Rank Rank Rank
Starting a business 58 42 w 59 Enforcing contracts 42 55 23 Immigration laws 30 45 43 Development & application of tech. 55 56 46 Scientific research legislation 55 49 49 Intellectual property rights 51 38 31
Subfactors 2016 2017 2018 2019 202044 45 38 33 39
51 46 52 58 41
48 49 51 49 48
Adaptive attitudes Rank Rank Rank
E-Participation 18 44 47 Internet retailing 43 17 56 Tablet possession 47 39 51 Smartphone possession 34 w 58 36 Attitudes toward globalization 44 54 u 18
Training & education Scientific concentration
Talent
Robots in Education and R&D
IT integration
Business agility IT integration
Scientific concentration
Capital Technological framework
FACTORS BREAKDOWN - STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES
BRAZIL
FUTURE READINESS
TECHNOLOGY
Opportunities and threats E-GovernmentWorld robots distribution Public-private partnerships
IT & media stock market capitalization Communications technology
Regulatory framework
Capital
Technological framework
KNOWLEDGE
Entrepreneurial fear of failure
Agility of companies Cyber securityUse of big data and analytics Software piracyKnowledge transfer
Adaptive attitudes
Business agility
Venture capital Internet bandwidth speedInvestment in Telecommunications High-tech exports (%)
Funding for technological development Mobile Broadband subscribersBanking and financial services Wireless broadbandCountry credit rating Internet users
Training & education
Employee training Total expenditure on R&D (%)Total public expenditure on education Total R&D personnel per capitaHigher education achievement Female researchersPupil-teacher ratio (tertiary education) R&D productivity by publicationGraduates in Sciences Scientific and technical employmentWomen with degrees High-tech patent grants
WORLD TALENTRANKING 2019
All data are available from theWorld Competitiveness Online.
Visit our eShop
Alpha AlphaLabel Beta BetaLabel Gamma GammaLabel1 2 2 2 2 2 24 4 4 2 2
Value
u 6.2 % 8u 21.7 % 28 1,948 US$ 44 24.26 ratio 56 24.65 ratio 59 4.08 Survey [0..10] 51 5.06 Survey [0..10] 53u 44.02 % 44w 2.14 Survey [0..10] 61
Value
82.40 index 35 5.83 Survey [0..10] 49 4.99 Survey [0..10] 48 3.35 Survey [0..10] 52 3.97 Survey [0..10] 58 3.06 Survey [0..10] 58 15,916 US$ 36 100,107 US$ 48u 9.02 % 14 2.98 Survey [0..10] 51u 12.79 micrograms 23
Value
0.93 % 31 3.50 Survey [0..10] 57 4.34 Survey [0..10] 60 4.28 Survey [0..10] 58 4.03 Survey [0..10] 56w 2.13 Survey [0..10] 62 17.73 % 56w 3.59 Survey [0..10] 61w 3.97 Survey [0..10] 61w 2.88 Survey [0..10] 63 0.10 number 58 389 Average 56
Investment & Development 2019 Rank
Health infrastructure meets the needs of society
2019 Rank
Total public expenditure on education Percentage of GDP
Pupil-teacher ratio (secondary education)Apprenticeships are sufficiently implemented
Readiness 2019 Rank
Educational assessment - PISA PISA survey of 15-year olds
Appeal
Exposure to particle pollution Mean population exposure to PM2.5, Micrograms per cubic metre
is readily available
Labor force growth Percentage change
Skilled labor
Management education meets the needs of the business community
Language skills are meeting the needs of enterprises
Student mobility inbound Foreign tertiary-level students per 1000 inhabitants
Primary and secondary education meets the needs of a competitive economy
Graduates in Sciences % of graduates in ICT, Engineering, Math & Natural Sciences
University education meets the needs of a competitive economy
Finance skills are readily available
International experience of senior managers is generally significant
Competent senior managers are readily available
Justice is fairly administered
Remuneration in services professions Gross annual income including supplements such as bonuses, US$
Remuneration of management Total base salary plus bonuses and long-term incentives, US$
Effective personal income tax rate Percentage of an income equal to GDP per capita
Brain drain (well-educated and skilled people) does not hinder competitiveness in your economy
Quality of life is high
Foreign highly-skilled personnel are attracted to your country's business environment
Cost-of-living index Index of a basket of goods & services in the main city, including housing (New York City = 100)
Attracting and retaining talents is a priority in companies
Worker motivation in companies is high
Gov. expenditure on education per student Percentage of GDP per capita (secondary education)
Total public exp. on education per student
BRAZIL
Spending per enrolled pupil/student, all levels
Pupil-teacher ratio (primary education) Ratio of students to teaching staff
Ratio of students to teaching staff
Employee training is a high priority in companies
Female labor force Percentage of total labor force
IMD World Talent Ranking 2019
OVERALL PERFORMANCE (63 countries)
54
45
52
58
61
39 39
45
49
52
44
47 47
53
49
61
54
61 6162
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Overall
Investment &Development
Appeal
Readiness
52
4961
62
Investment & Development
Appeal
Readiness
The direction of the triangle indicates the performance change from the last year: improved or stabledeclined
2020
IMD WORLDCOMPETITIVENESSYEARBOOK
IMD
Wor
ld C
ompe
titive
ness
Year
book
About the Institute for Management Development (IMD)
IMD is an independent academic institution with Swiss roots and global
reach, founded almost 75 years ago by business leaders for business
leaders. Since its creation, IMD has been a pioneering force in developing
leaders who transform organizations and contribute to society.
Based in Lausanne (Switzerland) and Singapore, IMD has been ranked
in the Top 3 of the FT’s annual Executive Education Global Ranking for
the last nine consecutive years and in the top five for 17 consecutive
years. Our MBA and EMBA programs have repeatedly been singled out
among the best in Europe and the world.
We believe that this consistency at the forefront of our industry is
grounded in IMD’s unique approach to creating “Real Learning. Real
Impact”. Led by an expert and diverse faculty, we strive to be the trusted
learning partner of choice for ambitious individuals and organizations
worldwide. Challenging what is and inspiring what could be.
www.imd.org
IMD, IMD INTERNATIONAL, REAL LEARNING. REAL IMPACT, IMD BUSINESS SCHOOL and IMD WORLD COMPETITIVENESS YEARBOOK are trademarks of IMD - International Institute for Management Development