Counties — Labor Force and Private Business Establishments ...€¦ · Table B-10. Counties — Labor Force and Private Business Establishments and Employment [Includes United States,

Table B-10. Counties — Labor Force and Private Business Establishments andEmployment

[Includes United States, states, and 3,141 counties/county equivalents defined as of February 22, 2005. For more information on these areas, see Appendix C, Geographic Information]

County

Civilian labor force Private nonfarm businesses

Total Number ofunemployed

Unemploymentrate1 Establishments Employment2

Annual payrollper employee,

2004

2006 2000

Netchange,

2000–2006 2006 2000 2006 2000 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004

Amount(dol.)

Percentof

U.S.average

UNITED STATES. . . . . . . . 151,428,000 142,583,000 8,845,000 7,001,000 5,692,000 4.6 4.0 7,387,724 317,676 115,074,924 1,009,948 36,967 100.0

ALABAMA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,199,562 2,154,545 45,017 78,989 87,398 3.6 4.1 3100,802 3985 31,629,141 3–23,933 330,552 382.6

Autauga . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24,538 21,954 2,584 730 784 3.0 3.6 857 88 10,135 1,020 25,328 68.5Baldwin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80,414 70,300 10,114 2,269 2,291 2.8 3.3 4,370 498 49,300 4,810 25,220 68.2Barbour . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,877 11,475 –598 555 560 5.1 4.9 560 –17 9,303 –1,639 23,897 64.6Bibb . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,077 8,643 434 339 406 3.7 4.7 317 –14 3,202 –201 22,898 61.9Blount . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27,102 25,389 1,713 782 783 2.9 3.1 698 –44 6,441 –1,427 26,796 72.5

Bullock. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,758 3,993 –235 301 302 8.0 7.6 130 –6 2,243 –113 22,188 60.0Butler . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,409 9,212 197 481 636 5.1 6.9 490 –14 6,023 736 23,613 63.9Calhoun . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54,626 53,392 1,234 1,983 2,391 3.6 4.5 2,541 –25 41,664 1,050 26,085 70.6Chambers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,943 17,551 –1,608 835 683 5.2 3.9 620 –25 9,303 –2,217 27,783 75.2Cherokee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,205 11,419 786 452 454 3.7 4.0 359 3 3,735 321 22,542 61.0

Chilton. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,160 19,677 483 644 747 3.2 3.8 772 –3 7,104 284 23,502 63.6Choctaw. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,387 6,231 –844 273 361 5.1 5.8 296 –9 3,432 –257 38,762 104.9Clarke . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,245 11,676 –1,431 578 759 5.6 6.5 691 –44 7,347 –501 24,577 66.5Clay . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,272 6,618 –346 256 360 4.1 5.4 220 –9 3,908 –648 24,129 65.3Cleburne . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,813 7,031 –218 209 252 3.1 3.6 184 –11 2,573 318 22,456 60.7

Coffee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,854 20,072 782 699 1,033 3.4 5.1 949 –6 11,275 –1,957 22,566 61.0Colbert. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25,873 26,178 –305 1,066 1,288 4.1 4.9 1,323 –37 18,504 –883 27,285 73.8Conecuh . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,223 5,526 –303 260 319 5.0 5.8 235 –24 3,254 –513 25,821 69.8Coosa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,890 5,342 –452 244 256 5.0 4.8 112 –16 1,099 –331 25,255 68.3Covington. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,495 17,441 54 603 1,067 3.4 6.1 871 –46 11,613 693 23,076 62.4

Crenshaw. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,700 6,167 533 239 312 3.6 5.1 247 –9 2,848 –94 20,281 54.9Cullman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39,955 39,053 902 1,219 1,426 3.1 3.7 1,713 24 22,764 940 25,987 70.3Dale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,979 20,979 – 876 971 4.2 4.6 805 –37 12,020 1,862 30,286 81.9Dallas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,039 17,926 –1,887 1,189 1,283 7.4 7.2 909 –38 14,180 –941 28,598 77.4DeKalb . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32,124 32,653 –529 1,186 1,163 3.7 3.6 1,224 10 21,029 – 25,919 70.1

Elmore. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35,339 31,327 4,012 1,073 1,099 3.0 3.5 1,080 –11 12,280 2,908 24,046 65.0Escambia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,567 16,241 –1,674 650 747 4.5 4.6 804 –53 9,531 –2,147 25,256 68.3Etowah . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47,117 48,595 –1,478 1,787 2,512 3.8 5.2 2,137 –18 31,086 –3,259 25,164 68.1Fayette . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,013 8,345 –332 300 432 3.7 5.2 337 –12 3,919 –1,418 24,721 66.9Franklin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,130 14,741 –611 587 855 4.2 5.8 594 –10 9,025 –820 25,081 67.8

Geneva . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,947 12,294 –347 400 553 3.3 4.5 464 8 4,417 7 19,093 51.6Greene . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,565 3,536 29 176 214 4.9 6.1 130 –4 1,608 291 21,981 59.5Hale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,351 7,033 318 344 375 4.7 5.3 197 –33 2,736 –470 22,586 61.1Henry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,659 7,708 –49 274 336 3.6 4.4 329 4 3,778 –407 24,852 67.2Houston . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47,253 45,633 1,620 1,440 1,777 3.0 3.9 2,878 98 47,753 1,510 28,528 77.2

Jackson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27,339 28,156 –817 1,097 1,292 4.0 4.6 858 –36 12,655 –2,134 24,506 66.3Jefferson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 324,652 332,550 –7,898 11,527 11,666 3.6 3.5 17,413 –53 349,712 –12,408 37,365 101.1Lamar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,178 7,498 –1,320 291 462 4.7 6.2 259 –30 3,597 –1,246 26,711 72.3Lauderdale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43,549 43,860 –311 1,622 1,935 3.7 4.4 2,002 –2 26,009 –5,266 22,777 61.6Lawrence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,141 16,731 –590 686 738 4.3 4.4 396 –19 4,538 –851 34,277 92.7

Lee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65,790 58,646 7,144 1,966 2,072 3.0 3.5 2,205 213 37,540 5,269 23,690 64.1Limestone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36,039 33,186 2,853 1,165 1,114 3.2 3.4 1,196 105 16,491 –818 28,945 78.3Lowndes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,041 5,089 –48 334 312 6.6 6.1 142 –8 2,255 104 43,077 116.5Macon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,926 9,157 –231 424 469 4.8 5.1 225 –13 5,353 –994 31,387 84.9Madison. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163,821 150,347 13,474 4,756 4,709 2.9 3.1 7,532 315 135,587 8,816 36,866 99.7

Marengo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,913 9,095 –182 361 419 4.1 4.6 524 22 6,417 245 27,375 74.1Marion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,776 14,309 –533 536 844 3.9 5.9 561 –169 7,602 –2,851 26,233 71.0Marshall . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42,667 40,940 1,727 1,315 1,736 3.1 4.2 1,875 –74 32,740 90 23,914 64.7Mobile . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 184,720 186,720 –2,000 6,861 8,147 3.7 4.4 9,140 –91 153,394 –3,047 29,763 80.5Monroe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,424 10,352 –928 514 591 5.5 5.7 431 –15 8,265 –102 29,491 79.8

Montgomery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107,668 106,838 830 3,977 3,953 3.7 3.7 6,023 –8 106,382 –8,934 30,383 82.2Morgan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56,511 56,833 –322 2,028 2,114 3.6 3.7 2,757 22 46,608 –48 29,813 80.6Perry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,612 4,120 –508 275 338 7.6 8.2 157 –2 1,845 –292 19,526 52.8Pickens . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,257 8,653 –396 374 578 4.5 6.7 321 –29 3,131 –120 21,308 57.6Pike . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,437 14,184 1,253 552 693 3.6 4.9 624 –47 10,077 141 25,128 68.0

Randolph . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,929 10,059 –130 471 434 4.7 4.3 406 19 5,269 164 18,155 49.1Russell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21,727 22,217 –490 1,137 908 5.2 4.1 834 –71 9,540 –1,625 23,137 62.6St. Clair . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34,556 31,698 2,858 1,095 1,051 3.2 3.3 1,145 23 12,988 478 23,439 63.4Shelby . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97,164 83,285 13,879 2,396 2,009 2.5 2.4 4,373 618 66,058 8,977 34,815 94.2Sumter. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,869 5,406 –537 296 437 6.1 8.1 235 –11 3,109 229 22,896 61.9

Talladega . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40,076 35,923 4,153 1,853 1,647 4.6 4.6 1,358 –23 23,056 2,039 29,964 81.1Tallapoosa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18,594 19,544 –950 847 847 4.6 4.3 829 6 17,425 –7,945 23,312 63.1Tuscaloosa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88,366 82,536 5,830 2,584 2,869 2.9 3.5 3,998 43 71,318 1,708 31,324 84.7Walker . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30,614 31,768 –1,154 1,234 1,634 4.0 5.1 1,365 –78 15,557 –271 25,537 69.1Washington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,971 7,784 –813 363 472 5.2 6.1 258 –3 2,802 –605 43,620 118.0Wilcox . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,618 3,959 –341 280 308 7.7 7.8 229 6 2,173 –456 34,258 92.7Winston . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,722 11,758 –1,036 475 816 4.4 6.9 518 94 8,605 –531 20,855 56.4

See footnotes at end of table.

434 County and City Data Book: 2007U.S. Census Bureau

Table B-10. Counties — Labor Force and Private Business Establishments andEmployment—Con.


County





2004

2006 2000

Netchange,

2000–2006 2006 2000 2006 2000 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004

Amount(dol.)

Percentof

U.S.average

ALASKA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 346,769 319,002 27,767 23,238 19,678 6.7 6.2 319,387 3886 3223,153 318,266 340,890 3110.6

Aleutians East . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,133 938 195 100 79 8.8 8.4 43 –5 1,442 –591 32,444 87.8Aleutians West . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,180 2,733 447 187 138 5.9 5.0 121 12 3,990 –120 26,775 72.4Anchorage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150,905 140,456 10,449 8,052 6,909 5.3 4.9 8,250 362 122,801 10,037 44,498 120.4Bethel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,980 6,386 594 926 558 13.3 8.7 229 –1 3,972 498 31,644 85.6Bristol Bay . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,022 922 100 56 57 5.5 6.2 78 12 320 –94 79,891 216.1

Denali . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,706 1,337 369 97 95 5.7 7.1 94 27 505 182 82,463 223.1Dillingham . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,113 1,958 155 201 140 9.5 7.2 95 –1 1,145 –39 42,225 114.2Fairbanks North Star . . . . . . . . 44,914 40,952 3,962 2,611 2,443 5.8 6.0 2,348 173 26,467 4,859 38,040 102.9Haines. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,457 1,394 63 119 110 8.2 7.9 121 2 491 –16 33,908 91.7Juneau . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18,446 18,004 442 910 816 4.9 4.5 1,086 –25 10,206 173 34,414 93.1

Kenai Peninsula . . . . . . . . . . . 25,418 24,539 879 2,101 1,963 8.3 8.0 1,878 71 12,455 1,117 35,547 96.2Ketchikan Gateway . . . . . . . . . 8,071 8,279 –208 500 505 6.2 6.1 560 –26 4,747 –341 35,327 95.6Kodiak Island . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,062 6,524 –462 465 526 7.7 8.1 454 1 3,836 –535 33,875 91.6Lake and Peninsula . . . . . . . . . 1,073 1,034 39 66 53 6.2 5.1 56 5 156 –9 48,359 130.8Matanuska-Susitna . . . . . . . . . 37,302 28,820 8,482 2,889 2,050 7.7 7.1 1,704 283 11,610 1,967 33,019 89.3

Nome . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,910 3,694 216 475 348 12.1 9.4 171 –15 2,005 204 34,307 92.8North Slope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,124 3,396 728 289 278 7.0 8.2 135 3 1,997 39 53,157 143.8Northwest Arctic . . . . . . . . . . . 2,967 2,939 28 338 259 11.4 8.8 66 –27 1,621 59 48,463 131.1Prince of Wales-

Outer Ketchikan . . . . . . . . . . 2,342 2,655 –313 339 368 14.5 13.9 154 –3 1,173 66 21,716 58.7Sitka . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,705 4,449 256 256 208 5.4 4.7 408 15 3,125 273 32,225 87.2

Skagway-Hoonah-Angoon . . . . . 1,872 1,824 48 244 176 13.0 9.6 206 49 687 95 38,661 104.6Southeast Fairbanks . . . . . . . . 3,278 2,261 1,017 360 272 11.0 12.0 160 9 969 343 35,082 94.9Valdez-Cordova . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,189 5,211 –22 447 386 8.6 7.4 435 –27 2,684 239 50,916 137.7Wade Hampton . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,554 2,227 327 528 332 20.7 14.9 58 –5 646 –39 16,203 43.8Wrangell-Petersburg. . . . . . . . . 2,913 3,068 –155 282 290 9.7 9.5 267 –21 1,544 –102 33,256 90.0Yakutat . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 311 370 –59 31 25 10.0 6.8 37 3 179 –107 30,056 81.3Yukon-Koyukuk . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,825 2,636 189 371 296 13.1 11.2 116 –20 576 4 31,514 85.2

ARIZONA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,977,094 2,505,306 471,788 122,713 100,390 4.1 4.0 3125,693 310,889 32,044,134 3124,781 333,834 391.5

Apache . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,988 19,023 965 1,994 1,746 10.0 9.2 518 12 5,902 –612 22,279 60.3Cochise . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56,500 48,549 7,951 2,562 2,196 4.5 4.5 2,304 104 26,659 3,978 25,622 69.3Coconino . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69,015 62,556 6,459 3,006 2,817 4.4 4.5 3,722 264 43,410 4,493 25,063 67.8Gila . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,783 20,274 509 1,085 1,052 5.2 5.2 1,114 –33 11,021 –1,931 25,367 68.6Graham . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,296 12,253 1,043 655 676 4.9 5.5 510 –5 5,110 171 20,418 55.2

Greenlee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,787 3,914 –127 142 167 3.7 4.3 86 –18 2,642 –594 45,124 122.1La Paz. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,730 7,597 133 446 473 5.8 6.2 352 –10 3,764 –171 20,414 55.2Maricopa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,926,869 1,595,203 331,666 67,134 52,507 3.5 3.3 79,345 7,331 1,411,802 57,553 36,256 98.1Mohave . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92,410 68,585 23,825 3,958 2,996 4.3 4.4 3,963 517 42,462 7,617 25,826 69.9Navajo. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37,788 34,227 3,561 2,755 2,511 7.3 7.3 1,845 105 18,286 1,596 27,273 73.8

Pima . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 449,033 408,961 40,072 18,039 15,245 4.0 3.7 19,735 1,103 306,821 13,439 31,549 85.3Pinal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90,772 69,574 21,198 4,580 3,211 5.0 4.6 2,373 332 30,127 4,996 26,208 70.9Santa Cruz . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,338 14,738 1,600 1,253 1,230 7.7 8.3 1,174 91 10,810 730 23,470 63.5Yavapai . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96,005 75,543 20,462 3,782 2,947 3.9 3.9 5,733 748 52,960 6,897 25,699 69.5Yuma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76,781 64,311 12,470 11,322 10,616 14.7 16.5 2,740 203 38,171 6,938 24,822 67.1

ARKANSAS. . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,364,646 1,260,256 104,390 71,760 52,904 5.3 4.2 365,291 32,106 31,007,512 316,682 328,457 377.0

Arkansas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,582 10,159 1,423 905 460 7.8 4.5 580 3 8,583 308 27,101 73.3Ashley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,706 10,503 –797 749 612 7.7 5.8 474 –31 7,718 –895 30,427 82.3Baxter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,525 16,290 1,235 947 670 5.4 4.1 1,073 34 12,291 398 25,037 67.7Benton. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102,814 76,889 25,925 3,459 2,125 3.4 2.8 4,565 908 89,174 21,696 34,260 92.7Boone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,079 16,245 834 840 674 4.9 4.1 942 –6 12,902 –1,064 27,433 74.2

Bradley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,610 5,102 508 410 327 7.3 6.4 303 4 3,715 604 21,822 59.0Calhoun . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,669 2,558 111 188 140 7.0 5.5 86 –7 835 28 26,595 71.9Carroll . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,902 13,039 863 620 510 4.5 3.9 778 12 8,331 –149 21,558 58.3Chicot . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,916 5,434 –518 431 395 8.8 7.3 262 –21 3,140 –83 18,542 50.2Clark . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,061 11,225 –164 624 476 5.6 4.2 575 –11 8,594 322 22,737 61.5

Clay . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,975 8,074 –1,099 594 431 8.5 5.3 321 –32 4,249 –1,031 19,637 53.1Cleburne . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,631 10,735 896 596 481 5.1 4.5 602 32 5,830 74 22,672 61.3Cleveland. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,216 3,902 314 263 192 6.2 4.9 98 –14 822 32 20,327 55.0Columbia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,212 11,276 –64 694 573 6.2 5.1 622 –24 8,236 –612 25,901 70.1Conway . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,897 9,351 546 500 568 5.1 6.1 397 –12 5,199 –496 25,134 68.0

Craighead . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45,812 42,782 3,030 2,223 1,680 4.9 3.9 2,343 98 35,891 1,699 26,093 70.6Crawford . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28,033 24,780 3,253 1,278 880 4.6 3.6 991 76 16,877 105 24,774 67.0Crittenden . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22,684 21,963 721 1,545 900 6.8 4.1 967 19 14,878 –908 24,673 66.7Cross . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,522 8,684 –162 641 404 7.5 4.7 405 25 4,561 –89 22,348 60.5Dallas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,958 3,863 95 265 212 6.7 5.5 244 –11 2,968 158 22,271 60.2

Desha . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,200 6,319 –119 590 511 9.5 8.1 392 –2 3,941 –187 25,142 68.0Drew . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,481 8,743 –262 702 514 8.3 5.9 453 –17 6,169 –1,517 19,520 52.8Faulkner. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52,706 45,478 7,228 2,348 1,634 4.5 3.6 2,043 260 31,258 1,990 27,618 74.7Franklin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,690 8,075 615 376 271 4.3 3.4 279 –2 3,473 329 22,468 60.8Fulton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,118 4,970 148 269 192 5.3 3.9 175 11 1,348 73 16,045 43.4


435County and City Data Book: 2007U.S. Census Bureau



County





2004

2006 2000

Netchange,

2000–2006 2006 2000 2006 2000 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004

Amount(dol.)

Percentof

U.S.average

ARKANSAS—Con.

Garland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42,497 38,466 4,031 2,243 1,630 5.3 4.2 2,709 138 32,760 1,829 22,923 62.0Grant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,782 8,097 685 432 319 4.9 3.9 283 11 2,936 –81 25,302 68.4Greene . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18,938 18,135 803 1,096 858 5.8 4.7 796 7 12,616 –764 24,673 66.7Hempstead. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,956 11,079 –123 612 504 5.6 4.5 435 13 7,515 –260 23,184 62.7Hot Spring . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,565 14,293 1,272 819 599 5.3 4.2 525 –49 5,457 –704 25,707 69.5

Howard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,460 6,633 –173 363 279 5.6 4.2 326 7 6,748 –634 22,144 59.9Independence . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,683 16,717 966 993 802 5.6 4.8 858 32 14,737 262 25,310 68.5Izard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,416 5,224 192 342 242 6.3 4.6 235 –4 2,071 –129 21,448 58.0Jackson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,843 7,704 139 626 577 8.0 7.5 387 –43 4,775 –401 24,681 66.8Jefferson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36,561 35,943 618 2,932 2,059 8.0 5.7 1,637 35 28,007 –553 27,917 75.5

Johnson. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,078 10,202 876 584 425 5.3 4.2 399 1 7,131 –299 21,425 58.0Lafayette . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,131 3,455 –324 229 204 7.3 5.9 126 –12 1,251 –113 20,353 55.1Lawrence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,514 7,868 –354 521 415 6.9 5.3 369 –15 3,477 –856 22,408 60.6Lee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,456 3,896 –440 342 288 9.9 7.4 158 –2 1,269 –41 20,477 55.4Lincoln. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,191 5,039 152 422 306 8.1 6.1 173 13 1,833 156 22,954 62.1

Little River . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,550 6,394 156 303 291 4.6 4.6 211 –18 3,967 18 42,812 115.8Logan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,356 9,870 486 515 402 5.0 4.1 402 21 5,360 484 19,338 52.3Lonoke . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31,154 26,436 4,718 1,353 868 4.3 3.3 1,038 95 9,914 1,059 22,087 59.7Madison. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,021 6,923 1,098 290 214 3.6 3.1 213 15 2,610 666 21,275 57.6Marion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,977 6,656 321 370 253 5.3 3.8 247 14 3,259 253 21,589 58.4

Miller . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,744 18,214 1,530 939 808 4.8 4.4 764 25 10,829 –491 29,652 80.2Mississippi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,869 22,677 –1,808 1,699 1,743 8.1 7.7 902 –73 14,328 –3,335 32,185 87.1Monroe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,782 4,075 –293 289 206 7.6 5.1 217 –16 1,951 –54 17,807 48.2Montgomery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,409 4,078 331 211 165 4.8 4.0 142 –35 1,027 –57 21,880 59.2Nevada . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,420 4,609 –189 252 217 5.7 4.7 149 –12 2,274 308 25,026 67.7

Newton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,682 3,759 –77 189 160 5.1 4.3 107 –1 726 90 15,709 42.5Ouachita . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,636 12,401 235 1,029 724 8.1 5.8 604 –17 8,696 702 29,048 78.6Perry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,026 4,811 215 252 237 5.0 4.9 111 –10 529 –88 20,335 55.0Phillips. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,817 9,705 –888 770 594 8.7 6.1 491 –182 5,166 –655 21,441 58.0Pike . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,344 5,437 –93 280 223 5.2 4.1 240 –12 2,289 –149 19,963 54.0

Poinsett . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,663 11,447 216 778 537 6.7 4.7 421 1 4,461 –374 23,439 63.4Polk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,853 8,990 –137 432 364 4.9 4.0 493 3 5,536 118 21,662 58.6Pope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29,968 26,805 3,163 1,451 1,132 4.8 4.2 1,487 24 20,625 –1,144 26,472 71.6Prairie . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,405 4,405 – 264 191 6.0 4.3 171 –11 1,298 –32 19,099 51.7Pulaski. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 193,080 184,404 8,676 9,293 6,827 4.8 3.7 12,034 –9 224,515 543 33,423 90.4

Randolph . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,902 8,292 –390 574 433 7.3 5.2 336 –4 4,151 –411 20,958 56.7St. Francis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,758 10,919 –161 991 753 9.2 6.9 512 –57 6,886 –3,066 22,582 61.1Saline . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48,037 42,739 5,298 2,150 1,387 4.5 3.2 1,596 238 16,894 1,235 24,924 67.4Scott . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,859 4,935 –76 220 170 4.5 3.4 155 –20 2,190 –644 20,193 54.6Searcy. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,522 3,309 213 173 162 4.9 4.9 127 1 1,119 –76 16,442 44.5

Sebastian. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61,061 56,511 4,550 2,830 1,886 4.6 3.3 3,436 131 67,833 –5,096 29,941 81.0Sevier . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,704 7,242 462 324 274 4.2 3.8 286 –9 5,583 754 17,595 47.6Sharp . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,574 6,565 9 446 340 6.8 5.2 353 –22 3,201 22 18,224 49.3Stone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,776 4,666 110 268 203 5.6 4.4 227 –13 2,069 –233 19,758 53.4Union . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,925 20,200 –275 1,350 945 6.8 4.7 1,220 –36 19,503 445 29,236 79.1

Van Buren . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,150 6,628 522 436 350 6.1 5.3 322 5 3,135 208 18,598 50.3Washington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103,659 82,260 21,399 3,758 2,415 3.6 2.9 4,814 585 78,088 6,802 29,402 79.5White. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32,571 30,991 1,580 1,863 1,462 5.7 4.7 1,471 46 21,453 –303 25,459 68.9Woodruff . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,514 3,777 –263 304 234 8.7 6.2 154 5 1,335 –306 24,333 65.8Yell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,810 9,937 873 499 394 4.6 4.0 329 –46 5,764 –148 22,001 59.5

CALIFORNIA . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,901,874 16,857,578 1,044,296 872,567 833,237 4.9 4.9 3841,774 341,911 313,264,918 3380,226 341,820 3113.1

Alameda . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 745,890 768,785 –22,895 33,090 27,754 4.4 3.6 36,799 408 626,076 –29,654 47,737 129.1Alpine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 492 555 –63 32 35 6.5 6.3 62 10 1,305 257 12,175 32.9Amador . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,518 15,252 2,266 937 776 5.3 5.1 890 41 9,133 1,755 28,096 76.0Butte . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101,113 93,083 8,030 6,292 5,709 6.2 6.1 4,838 241 56,846 3,070 26,275 71.1Calaveras. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,960 18,119 2,841 1,224 990 5.8 5.5 1,026 41 6,517 760 26,048 70.5

Colusa. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,803 9,295 508 1,233 1,068 12.6 11.5 377 18 3,912 482 27,148 73.4Contra Costa . . . . . . . . . . . . . 518,535 500,752 17,783 22,190 17,758 4.3 3.5 22,462 397 326,359 10,592 47,254 127.8Del Norte . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,914 10,232 682 755 757 6.9 7.4 482 –38 4,068 –327 23,985 64.9El Dorado. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93,570 81,741 11,829 4,292 3,390 4.6 4.1 4,428 472 41,578 3,363 31,559 85.4Fresno. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 414,778 388,909 25,869 33,368 40,401 8.0 10.4 15,762 482 235,267 22,317 31,709 85.8

Glenn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,785 11,298 487 948 949 8.0 8.4 498 –2 4,191 –94 31,967 86.5Humboldt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60,232 60,104 128 3,354 3,474 5.6 5.8 3,568 30 37,079 –311 25,829 69.9Imperial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64,182 56,072 8,110 9,828 9,791 15.3 17.5 2,317 44 27,817 2,464 25,362 68.6Inyo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,173 8,840 333 422 402 4.6 4.5 620 10 6,128 591 24,824 67.2Kern . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 338,348 294,213 44,135 25,589 24,274 7.6 8.3 11,487 594 167,870 17,560 31,785 86.0

Kings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55,583 49,319 6,264 4,709 4,950 8.5 10.0 1,555 16 22,474 3,934 28,156 76.2Lake . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26,520 23,709 2,811 1,892 1,641 7.1 6.9 1,161 51 10,367 853 27,119 73.4Lassen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,354 11,360 994 983 819 8.0 7.2 487 –31 4,125 214 23,396 63.3Los Angeles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,860,620 4,677,326 183,294 228,994 252,432 4.7 5.4 239,571 13,289 3,883,777 19,906 40,039 108.3Madera . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63,487 55,038 8,449 4,435 4,769 7.0 8.7 1,926 61 24,063 903 29,421 79.6





County





2004

2006 2000

Netchange,

2000–2006 2006 2000 2006 2000 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004

Amount(dol.)

Percentof

U.S.average

CALIFORNIA—Con.

Marin. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132,235 141,740 –9,505 4,691 4,026 3.5 2.8 10,083 –174 102,053 –4,222 47,493 128.5Mariposa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,141 7,969 1,172 516 486 5.6 6.1 356 –6 4,688 1,541 24,034 65.0Mendocino . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43,877 43,586 291 2,302 2,404 5.2 5.5 2,712 –58 24,440 –328 25,986 70.3Merced . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100,211 90,429 9,782 9,366 8,675 9.3 9.6 3,048 89 43,724 4,178 28,685 77.6Modoc . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,045 3,754 291 313 278 7.7 7.4 190 –9 1,387 –175 23,933 64.7

Mono. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,381 7,399 982 369 348 4.4 4.7 595 44 6,726 613 21,614 58.5Monterey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 204,705 203,714 991 14,350 14,983 7.0 7.4 8,820 245 107,973 2,905 33,884 91.7Napa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72,560 66,617 5,943 2,820 2,351 3.9 3.5 3,955 208 54,563 5,037 37,837 102.4Nevada . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50,374 45,402 4,972 2,212 1,838 4.4 4.0 3,182 185 27,888 1,874 28,692 77.6Orange . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,623,569 1,480,917 142,652 55,276 52,233 3.4 3.5 85,368 6,812 1,435,590 56,873 41,974 113.5

Placer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 168,934 131,403 37,531 7,072 4,720 4.2 3.6 8,832 1,535 126,077 32,146 39,361 106.5Plumas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,309 9,749 560 789 684 7.7 7.0 810 84 5,033 460 30,135 81.5Riverside . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 886,407 680,509 205,898 44,367 36,439 5.0 5.4 30,993 4,428 479,752 86,946 30,427 82.3Sacramento . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 682,587 605,641 76,946 32,280 26,352 4.7 4.4 27,336 1,614 456,152 32,269 37,797 102.2San Benito . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25,018 27,418 –2,400 1,762 1,649 7.0 6.0 994 29 12,049 1,268 29,858 80.8

San Bernardino . . . . . . . . . . . . 884,106 739,227 144,879 41,768 35,388 4.7 4.8 30,144 3,065 529,498 63,871 31,436 85.0San Diego . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,518,007 1,375,719 142,288 60,482 53,822 4.0 3.9 74,524 6,602 1,151,140 98,926 39,132 105.9San Francisco. . . . . . . . . . . . . 421,474 472,545 –51,071 17,808 16,055 4.2 3.4 29,529 –1,877 534,015 –21,632 57,924 156.7San Joaquin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 287,754 258,976 28,778 21,360 17,964 7.4 6.9 11,056 869 170,985 16,580 32,090 86.8San Luis Obispo . . . . . . . . . . . 133,886 122,421 11,465 5,304 4,876 4.0 4.0 7,657 713 83,672 10,047 30,114 81.5

San Mateo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 368,207 397,978 –29,771 13,598 11,376 3.7 2.9 19,544 –863 309,002 –63,906 59,784 161.7Santa Barbara. . . . . . . . . . . . . 214,160 202,453 11,707 8,697 8,792 4.1 4.3 11,161 277 141,120 924 35,474 96.0Santa Clara . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 834,317 939,730 –105,413 37,258 29,397 4.5 3.1 44,021 –1,634 849,891 –149,628 69,107 186.9Santa Cruz . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145,893 148,435 –2,542 8,212 7,593 5.6 5.1 6,921 –51 74,477 –4,783 34,726 93.9Shasta. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83,782 74,768 9,014 5,542 4,481 6.6 6.0 4,634 166 50,727 4,611 29,098 78.7

Sierra . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,619 1,798 –179 121 103 7.5 5.7 84 –15 324 –336 29,272 79.2Siskiyou . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18,960 19,128 –168 1,522 1,420 8.0 7.4 1,275 12 9,367 –249 24,709 66.8Solano. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 212,415 198,696 13,719 10,294 9,031 4.8 4.5 7,025 520 103,979 9,460 35,505 96.0Sonoma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 258,085 253,182 4,903 10,366 8,435 4.0 3.3 13,670 251 164,735 1,735 37,598 101.7Stanislaus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 227,114 207,888 19,226 18,105 16,149 8.0 7.8 8,768 511 132,987 12,354 32,065 86.7

Sutter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41,028 37,901 3,127 3,652 3,548 8.9 9.4 1,730 80 19,413 2,150 29,698 80.3Tehama . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25,447 23,603 1,844 1,646 1,519 6.5 6.4 1,098 94 13,014 997 29,124 78.8Trinity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,109 5,103 6 502 495 9.8 9.7 324 3 1,769 50 23,061 62.4Tulare . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 189,425 172,170 17,255 16,143 17,855 8.5 10.4 6,060 134 86,905 9,743 27,310 73.9

Tuolumne . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26,237 22,858 3,379 1,554 1,322 5.9 5.8 1,558 62 13,502 1,081 27,640 74.8Ventura . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 425,407 392,693 32,714 18,347 17,759 4.3 4.5 18,628 1,422 261,459 23,457 41,697 112.8Yolo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94,725 85,741 8,984 4,891 4,327 5.2 5.0 3,587 163 60,965 3,575 34,388 93.0Yuba . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26,509 24,320 2,189 2,346 1,928 8.8 7.9 824 –14 9,982 1,009 28,757 77.8

COLORADO . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,651,718 42,364,990 4286,728 114,681 464,798 4.3 42.7 3147,314 39,786 31,908,508 3–4,794 337,505 3101.5

Adams. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 216,237 185,865 (X) 10,707 5,157 5.0 2.8 7,796 (X) 121,273 (X) 34,386 93.0Alamosa. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,229 7,216 1,013 389 258 4.7 3.6 516 –1 5,141 84 24,497 66.3Arapahoe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 307,801 283,063 24,738 13,309 6,923 4.3 2.4 17,463 1,051 265,146 –27,261 43,860 118.6Archuleta . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,453 5,027 1,426 266 162 4.1 3.2 504 37 2,723 15 22,952 62.1Baca . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,449 2,107 342 79 58 3.2 2.8 98 –12 592 15 18,880 51.1

Bent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,433 2,275 158 139 85 5.7 3.7 77 – 557 –584 22,224 60.1Boulder . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 173,079 160,426 (X) 6,436 3,900 3.7 2.4 10,955 (X) 132,973 (X) 43,963 118.9Broomfield . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25,319 (X) (X) 1,103 (X) 4.4 (X) 1,485 (X) 26,440 (X) 53,364 144.4Chaffee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,220 7,362 858 364 243 4.4 3.3 825 81 4,899 128 22,438 60.7Cheyenne . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,395 1,123 272 37 28 2.7 2.5 59 –1 448 –1 28,725 77.7

Clear Creek . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,020 6,068 –48 244 163 4.1 2.7 341 7 2,350 –413 26,838 72.6Conejos . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,802 3,340 462 252 163 6.6 4.9 117 –4 678 –184 21,342 57.7Costilla . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,324 1,261 63 114 87 8.6 6.9 46 –11 244 9 17,869 48.3Crowley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,614 1,490 124 111 78 6.9 5.2 44 –5 468 –124 26,985 73.0Custer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,944 1,664 280 84 52 4.3 3.1 158 21 727 149 22,028 59.6

Delta . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,886 12,341 3,545 643 434 4.0 3.5 805 55 6,037 463 23,569 63.8Denver. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 310,908 306,409 4,499 15,112 9,200 4.9 3.0 21,798 –623 379,953 –31,350 44,030 119.1Dolores . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 966 903 63 64 48 6.6 5.3 53 10 200 13 20,730 56.1Douglas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 147,615 106,048 41,567 5,371 2,191 3.6 2.1 5,999 1,921 60,432 22,530 38,356 103.8Eagle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29,989 25,765 4,224 1,012 642 3.4 2.5 3,128 311 29,810 1,124 30,117 81.5

Elbert . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,314 11,656 1,658 534 264 4.0 2.3 521 68 2,298 –21 28,235 76.4El Paso . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 298,840 265,275 33,565 13,744 7,744 4.6 2.9 15,069 1,403 205,184 –4,805 33,882 91.7Fremont . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,667 17,879 1,788 1,101 688 5.6 3.8 920 42 8,137 90 22,769 61.6Garfield . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33,646 24,849 8,797 975 668 2.9 2.7 2,258 220 16,863 1,170 32,637 88.3Gilpin. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,440 3,321 119 141 81 4.1 2.4 98 15 4,088 371 31,738 85.9

Grand . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,796 7,652 1,144 291 196 3.3 2.6 854 106 5,234 –1,054 22,359 60.5Gunnison . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,593 8,213 1,380 304 237 3.2 2.9 952 88 5,973 –1,035 24,632 66.6Hinsdale. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 628 652 –24 19 13 3.0 2.0 72 –5 159 –12 23,409 63.3Huerfano . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,427 3,078 349 206 165 6.0 5.4 176 –27 1,402 –106 22,052 59.7Jackson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,115 888 227 34 26 3.0 2.9 62 4 203 –14 23,143 62.6





County





2004

2006 2000

Netchange,

2000–2006 2006 2000 2006 2000 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004

Amount(dol.)

Percentof

U.S.average

COLORADO—Con.

Jefferson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 313,902 310,044 (X) 13,212 7,413 4.2 2.4 15,980 (X) 181,015 (X) 37,026 100.2Kiowa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 898 783 115 32 24 3.6 3.1 43 –5 265 23 19,415 52.5Kit Carson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,555 3,855 700 141 100 3.1 2.6 266 –20 1,799 –199 23,260 62.9Lake . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,128 4,061 67 171 138 4.1 3.4 209 6 1,259 –91 19,753 53.4La Plata . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30,510 24,521 5,989 1,031 711 3.4 2.9 2,235 234 17,962 134 28,691 77.6

Larimer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 171,145 146,678 24,467 6,713 3,679 3.9 2.5 8,888 871 99,726 6,148 33,259 90.0Las Animas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,616 6,679 1,937 347 262 4.0 3.9 403 33 4,042 768 20,275 54.8Lincoln. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,096 2,632 464 114 74 3.7 2.8 150 5 1,328 –19 23,329 63.1Logan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,351 10,026 1,325 390 284 3.4 2.8 622 –14 5,444 –261 24,321 65.8Mesa. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74,880 58,945 15,935 2,945 1,886 3.9 3.2 4,331 437 45,814 2,464 28,097 76.0

Mineral . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 445 422 23 23 17 5.2 4.0 57 –3 158 –2 23,525 63.6Moffat . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,464 7,015 1,449 315 248 3.7 3.5 426 36 3,698 6 35,026 94.7Montezuma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,252 11,806 1,446 584 468 4.4 4.0 788 8 6,641 –101 24,524 66.3Montrose . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,473 16,252 4,221 819 576 4.0 3.5 1,242 118 10,873 725 26,875 72.7Morgan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,448 12,566 1,882 566 369 3.9 2.9 682 20 8,444 153 26,063 70.5

Otero. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,452 8,822 630 577 365 6.1 4.1 520 3 5,132 –12 21,670 58.6Ouray . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,095 2,220 875 95 58 3.1 2.6 271 23 1,071 280 31,188 84.4Park . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,933 8,566 1,367 396 218 4.0 2.5 447 49 1,247 –89 26,616 72.0Phillips. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,426 2,057 369 83 53 3.4 2.6 141 –7 958 –56 22,061 59.7Pitkin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,386 10,067 1,319 366 288 3.2 2.9 1,592 60 15,838 347 29,294 79.2

Prowers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,046 6,943 103 413 198 5.9 2.9 407 –30 4,459 169 22,412 60.6Pueblo. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71,261 63,986 7,275 4,022 2,409 5.6 3.8 3,286 99 44,765 –3,588 27,276 73.8Rio Blanco . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,826 3,245 1,581 127 95 2.6 2.9 229 8 1,545 –34 33,343 90.2Rio Grande. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,624 5,826 798 318 255 4.8 4.4 375 –12 2,747 11 22,192 60.0Routt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,157 12,550 2,607 485 324 3.2 2.6 1,533 196 15,648 –1,863 32,652 88.3

Saguache. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,234 2,711 523 205 148 6.3 5.5 145 24 823 156 21,691 58.7San Juan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 555 515 40 28 24 5.0 4.7 77 22 258 181 31,814 86.1San Miguel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,509 4,751 758 191 147 3.5 3.1 623 89 4,691 441 24,986 67.6Sedgwick . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,639 1,401 238 53 37 3.2 2.6 91 – 542 24 18,327 49.6Summit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,863 16,129 734 534 383 3.2 2.4 1,968 133 21,556 1,935 20,394 55.2

Teller . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,005 11,907 1,098 549 347 4.2 2.9 691 52 5,273 –25 26,488 71.7Washington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,925 2,445 480 102 62 3.5 2.5 101 –16 633 –115 24,785 67.0Weld . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115,979 93,722 (X) 5,371 2,521 4.6 2.7 4,643 (X) 60,182 (X) 33,297 90.1Yuma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,491 5,045 1,446 176 128 2.7 2.5 342 –8 2,521 335 25,242 68.3

CONNECTICUT . . . . . . . . . . 1,844,235 1,736,831 107,404 79,160 39,161 4.3 2.3 393,011 3575 31,537,461 3–8,789 347,382 3128.2

Fairfield . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 464,411 445,342 19,069 17,597 8,978 3.8 2.0 28,475 –112 450,517 5,587 62,420 168.9Hartford . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 449,501 428,466 21,035 21,031 10,625 4.7 2.5 23,196 –2 456,061 –20,579 46,313 125.3Litchfield . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104,829 99,272 5,557 4,140 1,939 3.9 2.0 5,212 20 56,400 –2,518 34,296 92.8Middlesex. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91,681 85,321 6,360 3,338 1,714 3.6 2.0 4,350 114 65,440 4,998 39,392 106.6

New Haven. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 440,949 413,770 27,179 20,746 10,178 4.7 2.5 20,796 21 335,706 –3,222 38,808 105.0New London . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146,963 131,618 15,345 6,004 2,921 4.1 2.2 6,005 276 111,683 5,913 36,125 97.7Tolland. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83,114 75,553 7,561 3,110 1,371 3.7 1.8 2,529 –2 29,344 (NA) 30,416 82.3Windham . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62,789 57,491 5,298 3,195 1,437 5.1 2.5 2,315 128 29,689 –1,487 31,411 85.0

DELAWARE. . . . . . . . . . . . . 440,322 416,503 23,819 15,816 13,726 3.6 3.3 325,391 31,620 3391,682 314,405 341,040 3111.0

Kent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73,474 63,919 9,555 2,371 2,269 3.2 3.5 3,222 261 48,944 4,544 27,530 74.5New Castle. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 274,825 272,540 2,285 10,455 8,710 3.8 3.2 16,881 690 285,654 3,523 45,858 124.1Sussex . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92,024 80,045 11,979 2,991 2,748 3.3 3.4 5,219 600 56,763 6,017 28,365 76.7

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA . . . 315,874 309,421 6,453 18,917 17,505 6.0 5.7 19,518 –137 436,865 21,882 55,587 150.4

District of Columbia . . . . . . . . . 315,874 309,421 6,453 18,917 17,505 6.0 5.7 19,518 –137 436,865 21,882 55,587 150.4

FLORIDA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,988,611 7,869,690 1,118,921 295,850 300,284 3.3 3.8 3484,938 356,500 36,864,987 3647,601 332,017 386.6

Alachua . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123,748 116,195 7,553 3,275 3,495 2.6 3.0 5,590 419 83,565 2,156 28,485 77.1Baker . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,360 10,396 964 325 313 2.9 3.0 363 85 5,130 1,306 25,322 68.5Bay . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84,810 71,998 12,812 2,632 3,340 3.1 4.6 4,532 324 56,873 2,941 27,224 73.6Bradford. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,022 10,585 1,437 342 397 2.8 3.8 422 38 4,152 38 22,601 61.1Brevard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 261,417 232,007 29,410 8,553 8,420 3.3 3.6 12,938 1,578 174,830 17,132 33,571 90.8

Broward . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 974,486 855,214 119,272 30,105 31,101 3.1 3.6 56,087 5,759 652,609 33,208 34,287 92.8Calhoun . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,384 5,154 230 167 243 3.1 4.7 227 6 1,693 –211 19,040 51.5Charlotte . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68,085 55,163 12,922 2,345 2,043 3.4 3.7 3,711 638 35,448 3,763 25,508 69.0Citrus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54,339 43,743 10,596 2,039 2,044 3.8 4.7 2,701 330 26,042 –2,128 26,328 71.2Clay . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88,534 73,871 14,663 2,662 2,233 3.0 3.0 3,399 583 35,812 4,534 24,381 66.0

Collier . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 153,365 116,109 37,256 4,652 4,311 3.0 3.7 9,952 1,477 102,376 10,152 32,442 87.8Columbia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29,520 25,680 3,840 925 1,009 3.1 3.9 1,252 119 16,715 1,543 26,238 71.0DeSoto . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,412 13,277 1,135 511 589 3.5 4.4 476 53 4,474 –704 23,267 62.9Dixie . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,774 5,129 645 194 228 3.4 4.4 188 –1 1,526 117 22,033 59.6Duval. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 430,322 408,336 21,986 14,945 13,533 3.5 3.3 22,873 1,959 402,356 8,250 36,204 97.9





County





2004

2006 2000

Netchange,

2000–2006 2006 2000 2006 2000 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004

Amount(dol.)

Percentof

U.S.average

FLORIDA—Con.

Escambia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136,211 132,487 3,724 4,329 5,338 3.2 4.0 6,914 331 102,561 –4,033 28,405 76.8Flagler . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31,480 21,008 10,472 1,313 753 4.2 3.6 1,578 533 13,760 3,740 29,102 78.7Franklin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,159 4,414 745 150 174 2.9 3.9 360 42 2,329 56 22,320 60.4Gadsden . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,728 19,954 774 716 799 3.5 4.0 636 61 9,786 403 25,139 68.0Gilchrist . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,504 6,430 1,074 219 230 2.9 3.6 238 68 1,554 481 21,075 57.0

Glades. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,549 4,086 463 180 192 4.0 4.7 77 –51 729 –820 26,008 70.4Gulf. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,619 5,247 1,372 194 317 2.9 6.0 296 45 2,356 460 25,272 68.4Hamilton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,660 4,581 79 175 244 3.8 5.3 187 15 2,235 104 31,672 85.7Hardee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,091 10,754 1,337 466 633 3.9 5.9 414 54 4,012 549 25,669 69.4Hendry. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,706 16,296 1,410 1,091 1,171 6.2 7.2 557 77 5,869 685 27,118 73.4

Hernando . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60,263 49,595 10,668 2,608 2,159 4.3 4.4 2,917 548 28,266 4,658 24,615 66.6Highlands. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41,684 33,174 8,510 1,490 1,587 3.6 4.8 1,978 226 19,520 –22,540 24,108 65.2Hillsborough . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 601,719 528,979 72,740 18,935 17,245 3.1 3.3 30,690 3,856 501,501 –1,333 36,387 98.4Holmes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,689 7,740 949 261 372 3.0 4.8 285 30 2,046 –186 19,640 53.1Indian River . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59,596 51,057 8,539 2,494 2,604 4.2 5.1 3,873 421 40,234 1,631 27,595 74.6

Jackson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21,502 19,399 2,103 747 890 3.5 4.6 844 70 9,464 98 21,565 58.3Jefferson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,906 6,067 839 200 223 2.9 3.7 268 29 1,967 346 22,906 62.0Lafayette . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,857 2,719 138 78 110 2.7 4.0 87 –19 734 –118 19,617 53.1Lake . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123,126 93,300 29,826 4,090 3,341 3.3 3.6 5,706 1,090 63,295 8,811 26,492 71.7Lee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 283,015 207,750 75,265 8,082 6,703 2.9 3.2 15,126 2,733 177,318 34,264 30,492 82.5

Leon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139,341 134,833 4,508 3,805 4,107 2.7 3.0 7,071 635 94,327 4,202 29,294 79.2Levy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,791 14,400 2,391 569 559 3.4 3.9 753 119 5,820 195 21,479 58.1Liberty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,561 2,622 939 92 109 2.6 4.2 86 –7 1,364 641 23,720 64.2Madison. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,431 7,698 –267 370 313 5.0 4.1 337 28 3,912 420 21,214 57.4Manatee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154,265 123,240 31,025 4,464 3,914 2.9 3.2 7,076 1,474 90,321 8,857 30,186 81.7

Marion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131,653 109,216 22,437 4,453 4,412 3.4 4.0 6,557 1,074 78,223 5,088 26,980 73.0Martin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65,866 56,357 9,509 2,265 2,344 3.4 4.2 4,814 546 50,768 2,107 29,062 78.6Miami-Dade . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,158,801 1,103,485 55,316 43,637 56,585 3.8 5.1 72,749 6,240 852,296 –2,093 35,178 95.2Monroe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44,520 45,192 –672 1,107 1,291 2.5 2.9 3,792 54 32,471 107 23,970 64.8Nassau . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33,424 30,282 3,142 957 999 2.9 3.3 1,473 271 14,410 1,663 28,171 76.2

Okaloosa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98,757 80,410 18,347 2,386 2,959 2.4 3.7 5,432 634 66,074 7,778 27,673 74.9Okeechobee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,497 15,662 1,835 711 839 4.1 5.4 734 58 7,061 423 23,287 63.0Orange . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 575,990 499,652 76,338 17,678 15,283 3.1 3.1 30,142 3,751 589,727 14,794 32,562 88.1Osceola . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121,189 89,582 31,607 4,084 2,943 3.4 3.3 4,505 1,157 55,113 7,044 24,602 66.5Palm Beach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 631,038 541,759 89,279 22,523 22,812 3.6 4.2 40,988 4,478 470,989 22,338 36,287 98.2

Pasco . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 187,391 150,276 37,115 6,998 5,540 3.7 3.7 7,504 1,311 72,173 6,932 24,911 67.4Pinellas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 477,891 471,195 6,696 15,149 15,450 3.2 3.3 27,629 1,539 388,767 –52,295 31,788 86.0Polk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 269,119 231,280 37,839 9,364 9,529 3.5 4.1 10,683 1,074 166,646 5,181 29,897 80.9Putnam . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31,508 29,357 2,151 1,168 1,252 3.7 4.3 1,367 148 13,123 424 26,490 71.7St. Johns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85,415 66,464 18,951 2,323 1,963 2.7 3.0 4,366 958 42,149 4,249 27,764 75.1

St. Lucie . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114,980 87,455 27,525 4,840 5,017 4.2 5.7 4,658 851 51,927 10,347 27,366 74.0Santa Rosa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67,796 54,985 12,811 2,072 2,104 3.1 3.8 2,436 490 21,902 4,098 25,078 67.8Sarasota . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 180,823 148,844 31,979 5,360 4,756 3.0 3.2 12,911 1,641 133,183 –27,853 30,831 83.4Seminole . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 236,170 212,638 23,532 6,775 6,420 2.9 3.0 12,345 1,771 147,358 10,253 31,821 86.1Sumter. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29,152 16,926 12,226 788 728 2.7 4.3 745 232 11,172 6,185 28,425 76.9

Suwannee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,013 15,425 1,588 541 552 3.2 3.6 669 41 7,682 292 22,841 61.8Taylor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,736 8,279 457 342 407 3.9 4.9 435 54 6,181 1,130 29,164 78.9Union . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,117 4,530 587 135 197 2.6 4.3 130 17 1,507 62 26,933 72.9Volusia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 248,026 209,694 38,332 8,061 7,071 3.3 3.4 12,310 1,508 137,765 6,505 26,028 70.4Wakulla . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,596 11,697 2,899 371 375 2.5 3.2 398 52 2,824 332 24,998 67.6Walton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31,513 19,418 12,095 662 672 2.1 3.5 1,362 463 11,804 2,561 23,798 64.4Washington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,604 8,948 656 313 403 3.3 4.5 371 19 4,049 –83 20,466 55.4

GEORGIA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,741,860 4,242,889 498,971 219,835 147,527 4.6 3.5 3214,714 314,272 33,452,451 3–31,049 335,147 395.1

Appling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,869 8,596 273 497 454 5.6 5.3 394 9 5,249 556 33,117 89.6Atkinson. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,436 3,542 –106 190 204 5.5 5.8 94 8 1,335 67 27,619 74.7Bacon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,922 4,684 238 225 209 4.6 4.5 207 6 2,293 –506 23,959 64.8Baker . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,838 1,750 88 92 73 5.0 4.2 26 5 313 99 21,112 57.1Baldwin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,992 19,060 1,932 1,152 913 5.5 4.8 855 4 13,466 –1,805 25,095 67.9

Banks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,730 7,841 1,889 316 231 3.2 2.9 151 –46 1,202 –1,842 19,338 52.3Barrow. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31,655 25,258 6,397 1,322 750 4.2 3.0 945 134 10,650 1,100 28,961 78.3Bartow. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46,092 40,738 5,354 2,202 1,479 4.8 3.6 1,794 195 28,216 1,666 29,408 79.6Ben Hill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,403 8,181 222 484 384 5.8 4.7 373 –3 6,602 –672 25,781 69.7Berrien. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,039 8,086 953 379 313 4.2 3.9 274 –2 4,032 46 28,463 77.0

Bibb . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74,190 70,623 3,567 4,230 2,971 5.7 4.2 4,507 –82 82,506 –1,105 30,331 82.0Bleckley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,116 5,190 –74 312 211 6.1 4.1 191 –8 2,733 –461 22,560 61.0Brantley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,842 6,814 1,028 360 278 4.6 4.1 186 7 1,398 –64 23,054 62.4Brooks. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,603 7,591 1,012 353 344 4.1 4.5 186 –22 2,074 –315 24,282 65.7Bryan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,044 11,648 4,396 564 355 3.5 3.0 478 80 3,973 821 22,047 59.6

Bulloch . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31,674 27,410 4,264 1,333 1,043 4.2 3.8 1,364 144 17,116 635 21,655 58.6Burke . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,141 9,216 925 676 457 6.7 5.0 341 22 5,061 –320 33,066 89.4Butts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,438 9,097 341 510 413 5.4 4.5 387 47 4,951 651 24,072 65.1Calhoun . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,404 2,367 37 144 151 6.0 6.4 103 1 731 12 20,439 55.3Camden. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,828 17,940 2,888 875 700 4.2 3.9 803 111 8,078 6 20,409 55.2





County





2004

2006 2000

Netchange,

2000–2006 2006 2000 2006 2000 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004

Amount(dol.)

Percentof

U.S.average

GEORGIA—Con.

Candler . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,616 3,998 618 195 178 4.2 4.5 199 –6 2,327 –26 20,819 56.3Carroll . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52,523 45,066 7,457 2,541 1,657 4.8 3.7 1,958 112 26,022 –1,727 30,599 82.8Catoosa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35,902 29,817 6,085 1,329 785 3.7 2.6 862 105 11,808 992 27,250 73.7Charlton. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,546 3,967 579 209 161 4.6 4.1 175 –5 1,911 310 23,564 63.7Chatham . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130,632 112,074 18,558 5,247 3,916 4.0 3.5 6,788 166 112,579 5,470 31,235 84.5

Chattahoochee . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,687 2,641 46 254 212 9.5 8.0 71 14 685 –662 25,559 69.1Chattooga . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,042 11,678 –636 569 426 5.2 3.6 333 – 6,444 –413 20,683 55.9Cherokee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103,527 83,165 20,362 3,741 2,120 3.6 2.5 4,098 851 37,426 8,143 27,306 73.9Clarke . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61,628 54,489 7,139 2,429 1,848 3.9 3.4 2,901 304 46,120 4,840 27,191 73.6Clay . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,493 1,346 147 69 71 4.6 5.3 45 –1 528 149 20,538 55.6

Clayton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140,144 126,783 13,361 7,782 4,215 5.6 3.3 4,142 –232 71,746 –16,776 30,260 81.9Clinch . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,731 2,777 –46 143 146 5.2 5.3 125 –8 1,651 –874 17,530 47.4Cobb . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 382,689 362,179 20,510 15,778 10,011 4.1 2.8 19,163 1,212 312,292 –583 41,389 112.0Coffee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,915 17,319 –404 921 872 5.4 5.0 832 –5 14,731 –2,139 24,432 66.1Colquitt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,921 19,427 1,494 892 873 4.3 4.5 885 9 10,662 –590 23,395 63.3

Columbia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57,433 47,425 10,008 2,358 1,351 4.1 2.8 1,936 132 24,298 1,044 28,048 75.9Cook . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,056 7,287 –231 388 321 5.5 4.4 332 –13 3,365 –881 21,836 59.1Coweta . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57,810 48,904 8,906 2,366 1,590 4.1 3.3 1,946 281 25,883 2,184 27,709 75.0Crawford . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,337 5,895 442 325 229 5.1 3.9 90 14 699 52 19,345 52.3Crisp . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,382 9,797 585 610 474 5.9 4.8 547 –6 7,245 –529 23,913 64.7

Dade . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,686 7,741 945 351 229 4.0 3.0 234 12 3,174 653 22,551 61.0Dawson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,679 9,067 1,612 398 241 3.7 2.7 545 50 4,900 679 23,133 62.6Decatur . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,048 12,346 –298 689 540 5.7 4.4 609 23 8,272 –535 23,698 64.1DeKalb . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 380,339 382,767 –2,428 19,327 12,492 5.1 3.3 16,001 –966 272,394 –55,994 37,782 102.2Dodge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,583 8,539 1,044 474 395 4.9 4.6 366 –8 4,066 430 21,847 59.1

Dooly. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,895 4,813 82 291 225 5.9 4.7 178 –10 1,642 –1,311 24,391 66.0Dougherty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42,275 41,670 605 2,555 2,131 6.0 5.1 2,601 17 45,081 –558 29,769 80.5Douglas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61,650 51,635 10,015 3,038 1,516 4.9 2.9 2,415 310 32,876 3,655 25,647 69.4Early . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,772 5,373 399 289 259 5.0 4.8 230 –8 3,603 –114 31,638 85.6Echols . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,403 1,868 535 77 63 3.2 3.4 15 3 64 41 22,266 60.2

Effingham. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26,843 19,090 7,753 897 585 3.3 3.1 596 97 6,441 1,088 30,038 81.3Elbert . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,099 9,745 354 659 496 6.5 5.1 516 –15 5,841 55 24,229 65.5Emanuel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,941 9,967 974 561 548 5.1 5.5 423 4 5,827 535 21,902 59.2Evans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,056 4,709 347 225 197 4.5 4.2 233 –8 4,159 548 20,876 56.5Fannin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,815 9,098 1,717 438 336 4.0 3.7 540 87 4,583 402 21,335 57.7

Fayette . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55,088 49,991 5,097 2,132 1,314 3.9 2.6 2,987 576 39,150 9,558 29,387 79.5Floyd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51,711 44,870 6,841 2,217 1,659 4.3 3.7 2,058 42 35,667 –2,277 28,073 75.9Forsyth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77,892 57,518 20,374 2,498 1,355 3.2 2.4 3,778 1,410 45,787 16,100 35,855 97.0Franklin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,964 9,973 991 565 377 5.2 3.8 492 15 7,694 1,348 26,853 72.6Fulton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 472,795 432,000 40,795 23,155 14,787 4.9 3.4 32,899 1,953 730,700 –37,816 48,364 130.8

Gilmer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,219 11,345 2,874 513 362 3.6 3.2 513 81 6,583 487 23,985 64.9Glascock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,207 1,193 14 62 46 5.1 3.9 25 1 196 11 19,622 53.1Glynn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40,447 34,936 5,511 1,543 1,192 3.8 3.4 2,485 118 31,436 890 27,280 73.8Gordon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27,429 24,416 3,013 1,201 805 4.4 3.3 1,047 78 17,962 –1,538 27,982 75.7Grady . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,330 11,044 1,286 493 476 4.0 4.3 401 26 3,937 –24 22,518 60.9

Greene . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,985 6,392 593 409 272 5.9 4.3 355 32 3,802 –437 25,801 69.8Gwinnett . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 412,993 347,889 65,104 16,866 9,393 4.1 2.7 20,150 2,365 294,721 7,255 38,097 103.1Habersham. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,917 18,436 1,481 808 623 4.1 3.4 901 87 12,810 843 24,928 67.4Hall . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86,559 73,882 12,677 3,296 2,144 3.8 2.9 3,812 450 59,890 2,035 32,851 88.9Hancock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,438 3,291 147 291 258 8.5 7.8 84 2 657 –117 16,015 43.3

Haralson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,286 12,454 832 612 439 4.6 3.5 457 13 5,602 4 26,598 71.9Harris . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,574 12,962 2,612 584 399 3.7 3.1 452 36 4,021 –275 19,981 54.1Hart. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,091 11,410 –319 719 436 6.5 3.8 381 –4 5,412 –833 24,533 66.4Heard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,105 5,149 –44 248 202 4.9 3.9 115 –4 1,140 –303 25,992 70.3Henry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91,691 67,821 23,870 4,130 1,780 4.5 2.6 3,073 802 37,973 9,535 26,080 70.5

Houston . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66,202 53,848 12,354 2,824 1,802 4.3 3.3 2,153 187 30,678 3,959 25,202 68.2Irwin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,761 4,553 208 243 203 5.1 4.5 131 –4 1,890 –106 21,475 58.1Jackson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26,992 21,448 5,544 1,060 664 3.9 3.1 1,191 207 15,839 1,660 29,320 79.3Jasper . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,484 5,804 680 309 185 4.8 3.2 176 16 2,001 160 25,837 69.9Jeff Davis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,554 5,806 –252 403 261 7.3 4.5 289 –20 4,604 – 22,455 60.7

Jefferson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,033 6,785 248 454 441 6.5 6.5 359 17 4,496 47 27,616 74.7Jenkins . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,652 3,739 –87 199 191 5.4 5.1 143 –5 1,858 –456 23,293 63.0Johnson. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,804 3,420 384 206 209 5.4 6.1 135 –15 1,181 –401 24,871 67.3Jones . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,962 11,837 2,125 713 445 5.1 3.8 309 70 2,204 94 22,626 61.2Lamar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,060 8,084 –24 451 358 5.6 4.4 229 –8 2,662 –465 20,799 56.3

Lanier . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,957 3,348 609 153 162 3.9 4.8 106 –12 738 –244 19,885 53.8Laurens . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22,734 21,528 1,206 1,204 992 5.3 4.6 1,050 –13 16,782 17 26,543 71.8Lee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,823 13,203 3,620 626 439 3.7 3.3 295 87 2,808 334 23,997 64.9Liberty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24,042 19,736 4,306 1,331 1,051 5.5 5.3 758 23 10,614 1,124 23,752 64.3Lincoln. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,712 3,784 –72 234 211 6.3 5.6 163 2 1,096 –59 19,474 52.7





County





2004

2006 2000

Netchange,

2000–2006 2006 2000 2006 2000 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004

Amount(dol.)

Percentof

U.S.average

GEORGIA—Con.

Long . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,035 4,343 1,692 224 159 3.7 3.7 54 7 494 274 12,192 33.0Lowndes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52,383 43,640 8,743 2,053 1,914 3.9 4.4 2,656 248 41,008 4,870 23,317 63.1Lumpkin. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,820 10,957 1,863 521 318 4.1 2.9 457 75 4,825 779 24,288 65.7McDuffie . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,722 9,943 779 668 431 6.2 4.3 487 17 12,722 5,297 30,747 83.2McIntosh . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,407 4,908 499 225 203 4.2 4.1 211 –17 1,655 –371 18,972 51.3

Macon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,386 5,437 –51 393 352 7.3 6.5 216 7 2,371 –230 28,704 77.6Madison. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,090 13,867 2,223 579 445 3.6 3.2 402 –109 2,934 –4,007 20,616 55.8Marion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,460 3,336 124 153 129 4.4 3.9 85 8 1,510 –661 20,606 55.7Meriwether . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,160 10,180 –20 655 457 6.4 4.5 326 –16 4,171 –848 25,707 69.5Miller . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,780 3,263 517 135 128 3.6 3.9 140 –6 1,141 78 20,215 54.7

Mitchell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,569 9,946 623 521 497 4.9 5.0 446 50 6,711 –22 20,617 55.8Monroe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,861 11,398 1,463 585 410 4.5 3.6 406 8 4,060 487 25,488 68.9Montgomery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,458 3,938 520 237 226 5.3 5.7 104 –12 1,025 –143 21,654 58.6Morgan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,354 8,205 1,149 413 273 4.4 3.3 445 41 4,906 –841 27,309 73.9Murray. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21,771 19,697 2,074 930 651 4.3 3.3 450 –16 9,266 –1,556 25,702 69.5

Muscogee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86,121 83,999 2,122 4,712 3,897 5.5 4.6 4,386 182 81,332 –5,157 28,759 77.8Newton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43,897 32,438 11,459 2,308 1,041 5.3 3.2 1,413 232 18,133 2,544 31,233 84.5Oconee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,878 14,408 3,470 550 363 3.1 2.5 759 180 7,068 1,710 25,371 68.6Oglethorpe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,852 6,657 1,195 285 199 3.6 3.0 156 14 901 60 22,008 59.5Paulding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60,745 46,009 14,736 2,491 1,207 4.1 2.6 1,346 362 11,799 2,618 25,899 70.1

Peach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,578 10,882 696 683 511 5.9 4.7 492 46 6,332 –273 24,608 66.6Pickens . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,787 12,541 2,246 546 370 3.7 3.0 587 103 5,537 529 28,826 78.0Pierce . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,420 7,677 743 354 309 4.2 4.0 309 10 3,368 975 21,059 57.0Pike . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,952 7,013 939 362 255 4.6 3.6 224 29 1,356 135 21,299 57.6Polk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21,116 17,655 3,461 916 701 4.3 4.0 626 –4 9,347 910 24,770 67.0

Pulaski. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,631 4,387 244 210 174 4.5 4.0 198 –9 2,326 55 23,912 64.7Putnam . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,390 9,078 1,312 474 310 4.6 3.4 418 59 5,532 261 22,722 61.5Quitman. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 996 1,044 –48 50 65 5.0 6.2 37 2 247 19 21,866 59.2Rabun . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,842 7,294 548 444 221 5.7 3.0 513 28 5,351 –277 25,424 68.8Randolph . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,849 3,012 –163 184 173 6.5 5.7 153 –9 1,501 –53 22,302 60.3

Richmond. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90,641 87,564 3,077 5,637 3,798 6.2 4.3 4,623 169 84,075 333 31,652 85.6Rockdale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40,426 37,061 3,365 1,996 1,138 4.9 3.1 2,077 95 31,617 89 30,653 82.9Schley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,813 1,727 86 106 73 5.8 4.2 62 2 1,031 78 27,954 75.6Screven . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,150 6,622 528 359 315 5.0 4.8 240 3 2,792 –106 23,935 64.7Seminole . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,063 4,021 42 208 192 5.1 4.8 193 –2 1,576 86 19,428 52.6

Spalding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29,057 28,246 811 1,818 1,206 6.3 4.3 1,229 46 20,093 803 26,100 70.6Stephens . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,588 13,259 329 681 460 5.0 3.5 596 3 8,985 –768 25,599 69.2Stewart . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,987 2,091 –104 134 108 6.7 5.2 84 –10 592 –350 20,813 56.3Sumter. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,775 15,418 –643 926 656 6.3 4.3 702 4 10,838 –1,741 23,620 63.9Talbot . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,060 2,858 202 201 151 6.6 5.3 59 –1 418 –53 30,545 82.6

Taliaferro . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 761 851 –90 57 42 7.5 4.9 24 – 123 20 15,016 40.6Tattnall. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,135 8,884 251 488 504 5.3 5.7 291 –10 3,053 24 18,903 51.1Taylor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,319 3,419 –100 213 175 6.4 5.1 140 –1 1,270 –51 26,459 71.6Telfair . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,256 4,435 821 393 335 7.5 7.6 229 –9 3,388 –318 21,286 57.6Terrell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,654 4,675 –21 261 242 5.6 5.2 183 –8 1,650 –458 19,779 53.5

Thomas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23,763 19,910 3,853 971 810 4.1 4.1 1,133 74 17,976 –123 27,716 75.0Tift . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,220 18,985 1,235 1,025 765 5.1 4.0 1,135 7 17,487 –509 26,118 70.7Toombs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,389 12,300 1,089 715 806 5.3 6.6 738 7 10,716 416 21,546 58.3Towns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,990 4,258 1,732 203 170 3.4 4.0 315 26 2,682 571 21,260 57.5Treutlen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,692 2,640 52 163 201 6.1 7.6 91 –1 835 105 14,969 40.5

Troup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30,559 30,196 363 1,823 1,056 6.0 3.5 1,430 13 29,944 –1,944 29,975 81.1Turner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,206 4,382 824 300 237 5.8 5.4 171 –8 1,657 –52 19,659 53.2Twiggs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,683 4,617 66 273 199 5.8 4.3 79 –14 799 –516 28,860 78.1Union . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,684 8,122 2,562 397 301 3.7 3.7 566 110 4,864 1,155 23,790 64.4Upson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,865 12,842 –977 756 629 6.4 4.9 539 33 6,758 –1,604 26,058 70.5

Walker . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33,884 30,561 3,323 1,485 1,065 4.4 3.5 841 –67 13,807 –2,805 27,789 75.2Walton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39,106 32,650 6,456 1,763 1,001 4.5 3.1 1,526 303 15,530 4,157 27,162 73.5Ware . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,953 15,294 –341 759 774 5.1 5.1 992 16 13,279 154 22,003 59.5Warren . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,479 2,650 –171 210 141 8.5 5.3 93 16 1,221 –172 23,906 64.7Washington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,347 8,600 –253 490 396 5.9 4.6 415 14 6,638 –333 30,384 82.2

Wayne . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,973 11,398 575 669 552 5.6 4.8 552 11 7,062 –734 26,882 72.7Webster . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,182 1,073 109 55 39 4.7 3.6 29 5 269 11 30,052 81.3Wheeler . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,114 2,283 831 175 141 5.6 6.2 82 6 1,009 39 25,728 69.6White. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,500 10,863 1,637 467 368 3.7 3.4 635 55 5,487 897 20,773 56.2Whitfield. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47,226 43,833 3,393 2,109 1,515 4.5 3.5 2,547 –28 57,040 846 30,547 82.6

Wilcox . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,303 3,265 38 197 150 6.0 4.6 107 1 694 47 19,360 52.4Wilkes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,735 5,057 –322 297 227 6.3 4.5 268 2 2,918 –621 23,911 64.7Wilkinson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,569 4,528 41 269 188 5.9 4.2 155 2 2,695 –219 35,314 95.5Worth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,608 10,321 287 547 442 5.2 4.3 297 9 2,471 38 21,491 58.1





County





2004

2006 2000

Netchange,

2000–2006 2006 2000 2006 2000 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004

Amount(dol.)

Percentof

U.S.average

HAWAII. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 643,486 609,018 34,468 15,209 24,160 2.4 4.0 331,605 31,752 3473,500 341,408 331,837 386.1

Hawaii . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83,654 74,216 9,438 2,368 3,488 2.8 4.7 3,929 300 49,749 5,602 28,161 76.2Honolulu . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 450,171 433,110 17,061 10,319 16,683 2.3 3.9 21,439 802 333,514 17,652 33,384 90.3Kalawao. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . – – – – – – – – – – – – –Kauai . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32,559 30,371 2,188 764 1,372 2.3 4.5 1,897 199 25,185 5,352 26,880 72.7Maui . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77,104 71,321 5,783 1,758 2,617 2.3 3.7 4,295 406 61,020 8,770 28,843 78.0

IDAHO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 749,244 662,958 86,286 25,623 30,507 3.4 4.6 341,336 33,907 3488,676 337,888 329,074 378.6

Ada. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 195,589 170,639 24,950 5,287 5,703 2.7 3.3 11,332 1,193 162,352 9,173 34,757 94.0Adams. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,095 1,910 185 137 189 6.5 9.9 130 21 503 –61 27,068 73.2Bannock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40,803 38,397 2,406 1,411 1,764 3.5 4.6 1,977 83 25,604 1,497 26,174 70.8Bear Lake . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,100 2,987 113 95 140 3.1 4.7 128 –3 979 53 17,531 47.4Benewah . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,353 4,003 350 310 435 7.1 10.9 260 –30 2,560 –4 27,632 74.7

Bingham . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,758 19,849 909 721 859 3.5 4.3 841 65 9,774 756 24,938 67.5Blaine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,517 11,890 2,627 365 421 2.5 3.5 1,471 182 11,445 955 31,045 84.0Boise. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,831 3,431 400 132 166 3.4 4.8 144 20 687 173 19,825 53.6Bonner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,843 17,623 3,220 938 1,335 4.5 7.6 1,452 202 11,824 1,399 27,049 73.2Bonneville . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46,988 41,612 5,376 1,314 1,400 2.8 3.4 2,983 380 42,235 4,287 30,305 82.0

Boundary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,261 4,223 38 302 319 7.1 7.6 355 –3 2,329 –224 24,309 65.8Butte . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,200 1,462 –262 51 61 4.3 4.2 72 5 1,106 739 45,130 122.1Camas. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 636 539 97 17 20 2.7 3.7 30 10 195 48 10,687 28.9Canyon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82,136 66,038 16,098 2,943 2,907 3.6 4.4 3,431 482 39,762 –434 27,325 73.9Caribou . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,443 3,287 156 137 163 4.0 5.0 187 3 2,272 –47 39,493 106.8

Cassia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,482 10,298 184 400 499 3.8 4.8 627 14 5,722 –263 22,593 61.1Clark . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 531 539 –8 20 27 3.8 5.0 16 – 240 140 30,763 83.2Clearwater . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,336 3,674 –338 275 477 8.2 13.0 260 3 1,834 –123 24,749 66.9Custer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,577 2,617 –40 105 142 4.1 5.4 150 –3 753 –97 20,853 56.4Elmore. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,876 10,594 282 447 612 4.1 5.8 429 41 4,015 104 22,740 61.5

Franklin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,326 5,226 1,100 179 167 2.8 3.2 259 15 1,891 208 22,888 61.9Fremont . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,994 5,690 304 222 272 3.7 4.8 306 51 1,583 138 24,064 65.1Gem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,542 7,040 502 293 357 3.9 5.1 353 40 2,024 –281 19,217 52.0Gooding. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,616 7,173 1,443 229 263 2.7 3.7 332 –3 2,384 13 22,807 61.7Idaho. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,167 6,924 243 440 570 6.1 8.2 473 22 2,900 202 23,774 64.3

Jefferson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,320 9,028 1,292 318 334 3.1 3.7 406 59 3,315 165 20,094 54.4Jerome . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,330 9,253 1,077 327 388 3.2 4.2 480 62 4,736 379 24,052 65.1Kootenai . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69,381 56,473 12,908 2,638 3,499 3.8 6.2 4,109 446 40,377 3,365 27,955 75.6Latah. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18,593 17,613 980 554 748 3.0 4.2 878 6 8,061 354 20,841 56.4Lemhi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,026 3,841 185 222 300 5.5 7.8 317 14 1,676 146 18,940 51.2

Lewis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,753 1,739 14 53 111 3.0 6.4 122 4 627 –119 22,463 60.8Lincoln. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,609 2,198 411 102 94 3.9 4.3 79 7 639 46 20,249 54.8Madison. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,754 12,840 1,914 392 449 2.7 3.5 629 102 10,283 –1,958 19,919 53.9Minidoka . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,821 10,168 –347 442 573 4.5 5.6 361 –5 4,448 –701 25,561 69.1Nez Perce . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,254 18,608 646 728 955 3.8 5.1 1,191 –27 16,977 429 29,956 81.0

Oneida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,233 2,010 223 52 65 2.3 3.2 74 8 515 –59 20,507 55.5Owyhee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,951 4,795 156 109 185 2.2 3.9 177 17 1,152 –310 27,739 75.0Payette . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,402 10,012 390 563 654 5.4 6.5 437 12 4,237 –12 23,300 63.0Power . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,837 3,611 226 182 206 4.7 5.7 145 –4 1,743 –224 23,093 62.5Shoshone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,690 6,119 –429 417 581 7.3 9.5 371 –15 3,184 –631 26,954 72.9

Teton. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,636 3,664 972 104 106 2.2 2.9 346 103 1,455 351 25,368 68.6Twin Falls. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38,563 34,041 4,522 1,227 1,380 3.2 4.1 2,363 207 25,803 1,743 23,445 63.4Valley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,024 4,116 908 199 272 4.0 6.6 530 53 2,570 111 22,236 60.2Washington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,071 5,168 –97 225 343 4.4 6.6 233 1 2,110 39 20,934 56.6

ILLINOIS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,613,346 6,467,692 145,654 297,631 290,855 4.5 4.5 3315,854 37,787 35,217,160 3–283,876 339,846 3107.8

Adams. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39,222 35,876 3,346 1,368 1,327 3.5 3.7 1,919 5 30,319 –655 29,011 78.5Alexander. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,495 3,628 –133 275 285 7.9 7.9 143 –19 1,238 –488 23,247 62.9Bond . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,816 8,326 490 429 390 4.9 4.7 342 –10 3,803 –380 26,010 70.4Boone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25,630 22,041 3,589 1,453 1,084 5.7 4.9 791 89 11,225 –415 36,814 99.6Brown . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,421 2,782 639 104 95 3.0 3.4 128 3 2,266 332 30,259 81.9

Bureau . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,544 19,103 441 857 938 4.4 4.9 824 –36 10,509 78 29,593 80.1Calhoun . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,672 2,541 131 161 141 6.0 5.5 98 –11 561 –136 18,503 50.1Carroll . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,466 8,613 –147 426 497 5.0 5.8 445 –5 3,445 –573 26,283 71.1Cass . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,702 7,089 613 324 330 4.2 4.7 299 –2 5,067 505 24,405 66.0Champaign. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104,451 99,093 5,358 3,855 3,540 3.7 3.6 4,195 143 69,707 –968 28,440 76.9

Christian . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,409 17,456 –47 854 930 4.9 5.3 824 3 10,361 654 23,631 63.9Clark . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,725 8,706 19 441 426 5.1 4.9 374 –16 4,051 –624 25,297 68.4Clay . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,970 7,168 –198 357 432 5.1 6.0 382 4 5,492 –31 26,195 70.9Clinton. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,351 18,364 987 859 727 4.4 4.0 875 53 8,985 874 23,305 63.0Coles. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27,094 28,133 –1,039 1,152 1,177 4.3 4.2 1,280 –16 19,965 –2,035 26,021 70.4

Cook . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,630,338 2,728,495 –98,157 123,623 132,124 4.7 4.8 129,113 948 2,342,284 –211,722 44,712 120.9Crawford . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,525 9,581 –56 508 546 5.3 5.7 447 –10 6,158 –715 31,184 84.4Cumberland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,664 5,832 –168 259 282 4.6 4.8 188 1 1,542 –48 20,178 54.6DeKalb . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55,046 51,249 3,797 2,153 1,847 3.9 3.6 2,068 121 25,785 –283 27,880 75.4De Witt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,462 9,161 –699 367 505 4.3 5.5 389 –3 4,295 –871 35,997 97.4





County





2004

2006 2000

Netchange,

2000–2006 2006 2000 2006 2000 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004

Amount(dol.)

Percentof

U.S.average

ILLINOIS—Con.

Douglas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,349 10,327 22 430 406 4.2 3.9 687 52 6,687 –903 26,744 72.3DuPage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 531,514 529,697 1,817 17,959 17,684 3.4 3.3 32,908 532 591,755 –28,925 44,392 120.1Edgar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,695 9,857 838 512 441 4.8 4.5 412 11 5,569 346 24,973 67.6Edwards. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,428 3,640 –212 150 189 4.4 5.2 161 –5 2,758 –215 29,826 80.7Effingham. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18,256 18,330 –74 772 817 4.2 4.5 1,154 43 19,021 24 25,528 69.1

Fayette . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,142 10,239 –97 588 642 5.8 6.3 489 –3 5,069 49 22,075 59.7Ford . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,502 7,319 183 329 280 4.4 3.8 386 –37 4,024 –62 25,478 68.9Franklin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18,265 17,538 727 1,216 1,207 6.7 6.9 805 –72 7,635 –1,350 20,471 55.4Fulton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,935 17,639 296 933 978 5.2 5.5 730 –9 6,727 –667 21,468 58.1Gallatin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,621 2,870 –249 151 176 5.8 6.1 125 –12 1,153 –70 41,168 111.4

Greene . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,252 6,940 312 348 370 4.8 5.3 276 –19 2,011 –8 19,810 53.6Grundy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23,994 21,091 2,903 1,235 1,106 5.1 5.2 1,051 135 12,104 1,176 40,839 110.5Hamilton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,258 3,984 274 233 198 5.5 5.0 183 –4 1,265 90 19,524 52.8Hancock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,033 10,842 –809 472 487 4.7 4.5 464 –36 4,209 –590 24,027 65.0Hardin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,718 1,948 –230 133 129 7.7 6.6 68 –5 774 –57 22,811 61.7

Henderson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,232 4,285 –53 223 177 5.3 4.1 119 –9 649 –36 17,590 47.6Henry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28,329 27,308 1,021 1,174 1,343 4.1 4.9 1,121 –42 13,521 –1,308 24,728 66.9Iroquois . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,692 16,393 299 751 708 4.5 4.3 748 29 6,679 –455 24,299 65.7Jackson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32,699 30,317 2,382 1,346 1,352 4.1 4.5 1,392 –3 17,959 –401 22,388 60.6Jasper . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,066 5,328 –262 256 267 5.1 5.0 236 –14 2,205 –243 26,241 71.0

Jefferson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21,085 19,088 1,997 996 1,023 4.7 5.4 1,077 18 16,947 1,119 29,040 78.6Jersey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,947 11,147 800 573 514 4.8 4.6 440 23 4,438 –200 22,091 59.8Jo Daviess . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,565 12,772 793 524 549 3.9 4.3 766 3 6,848 –875 24,983 67.6Johnson. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,219 4,852 367 281 305 5.4 6.3 195 5 1,409 285 16,236 43.9Kane . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 256,553 221,711 34,842 10,911 9,510 4.3 4.3 11,790 1,497 187,957 6,383 34,276 92.7

Kankakee. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55,189 52,391 2,798 3,095 2,425 5.6 4.6 2,350 61 36,836 –22,903 30,348 82.1Kendall . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45,957 32,363 13,594 1,828 1,059 4.0 3.3 1,422 272 14,135 1,298 30,367 82.1Knox . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25,702 27,965 –2,263 1,387 1,354 5.4 4.8 1,205 –75 18,535 –2,724 23,377 63.2Lake . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 369,959 338,345 31,614 15,655 12,540 4.2 3.7 19,619 1,303 319,539 10,226 48,512 131.2LaSalle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58,777 56,313 2,464 3,134 3,003 5.3 5.3 2,958 12 37,281 –1,285 29,687 80.3

Lawrence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,390 8,088 302 413 453 4.9 5.6 331 –35 4,070 18 21,867 59.2Lee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18,305 17,682 623 835 760 4.6 4.3 788 –16 10,901 –122 29,403 79.5Livingston. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18,866 19,474 –608 808 742 4.3 3.8 890 –20 12,109 –345 31,142 84.2Logan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,473 15,024 –1,551 637 592 4.7 3.9 697 –6 8,450 –335 24,206 65.5McDonough . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,891 16,834 57 718 732 4.3 4.3 754 –37 8,946 –1,086 22,340 60.4

McHenry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 172,405 151,357 21,048 6,463 5,419 3.7 3.6 7,679 834 95,200 3,037 34,902 94.4McLean . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90,351 85,473 4,878 3,093 2,913 3.4 3.4 3,649 107 79,984 –2,741 38,392 103.9Macon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54,604 56,211 –1,607 2,917 2,930 5.3 5.2 2,695 –27 45,874 –11,261 33,561 90.8Macoupin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25,397 24,404 993 1,306 1,112 5.1 4.6 1,089 18 10,121 –282 26,111 70.6Madison. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140,570 132,802 7,768 6,907 5,856 4.9 4.4 6,053 246 85,327 48 30,674 83.0

Marion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18,604 20,712 –2,108 1,098 1,185 5.9 5.7 1,071 –89 12,302 –3,675 26,040 70.4Marshall . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,483 6,997 486 288 292 3.8 4.2 271 –26 3,035 137 24,377 65.9Mason . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,538 7,902 –364 442 459 5.9 5.8 314 –43 2,623 –186 23,842 64.5Massac . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,621 7,209 412 407 385 5.3 5.3 264 –9 4,499 –7 30,996 83.8Menard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,193 7,010 183 284 252 3.9 3.6 253 6 1,537 136 24,306 65.7

Mercer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,266 8,838 428 491 499 5.3 5.6 305 –45 2,211 –192 20,646 55.9Monroe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18,014 15,521 2,493 700 514 3.9 3.3 756 97 7,443 1,203 27,684 74.9Montgomery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,584 14,140 –556 846 796 6.2 5.6 768 –36 8,265 –833 24,846 67.2Morgan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,800 18,810 –1,010 870 790 4.9 4.2 923 –19 14,209 –1,203 23,826 64.5Moultrie . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,175 7,456 719 295 310 3.6 4.2 298 –4 3,696 180 28,505 77.1

Ogle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27,363 26,983 380 1,377 1,174 5.0 4.4 1,070 73 14,922 –294 32,430 87.7Peoria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96,663 91,271 5,392 4,089 4,138 4.2 4.5 4,850 8 101,462 –6,840 38,937 105.3Perry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,296 10,295 1 703 726 6.8 7.1 437 –19 5,097 –639 25,340 68.5Piatt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,430 9,043 387 345 332 3.7 3.7 363 –24 2,648 –214 25,440 68.8Pike . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,605 8,499 106 387 458 4.5 5.4 375 –16 3,020 –267 22,666 61.3

Pope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,945 2,033 –88 127 135 6.5 6.6 61 –6 333 –122 16,162 43.7Pulaski. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,936 3,096 –160 201 220 6.8 7.1 110 –15 736 –437 23,825 64.4Putnam . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,247 3,141 106 161 157 5.0 5.0 132 3 1,155 –461 42,821 115.8Randolph . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,587 15,201 386 739 766 4.7 5.0 726 –33 10,252 –728 28,149 76.1Richland. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,596 7,854 –258 359 484 4.7 6.2 499 –1 5,647 –617 26,821 72.6

Rock Island . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80,930 77,604 3,326 3,484 3,574 4.3 4.6 3,570 –75 63,217 –6,242 33,393 90.3St. Clair . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126,310 119,705 6,605 7,286 6,111 5.8 5.1 5,508 73 79,463 4,172 28,254 76.4Saline . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,424 11,774 650 681 819 5.5 7.0 640 –28 7,495 –420 24,728 66.9Sangamon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108,444 105,335 3,109 4,549 3,910 4.2 3.7 5,350 –13 81,658 –2,383 30,401 82.2Schuyler. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,439 3,983 456 184 204 4.1 5.1 159 –1 1,407 46 21,893 59.2

Scott . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,812 2,980 –168 149 144 5.3 4.8 94 –6 615 –373 30,481 82.5Shelby . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,208 11,706 –498 530 576 4.7 4.9 453 –30 5,273 214 25,813 69.8Stark . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,969 2,888 81 140 174 4.7 6.0 128 –4 882 –124 23,763 64.3Stephenson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25,434 25,972 –538 1,244 1,377 4.9 5.3 1,121 –9 17,730 –2,142 31,524 85.3Tazewell. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72,388 67,213 5,175 2,763 2,764 3.8 4.1 2,906 72 42,901 318 29,856 80.8





County





2004

2006 2000

Netchange,

2000–2006 2006 2000 2006 2000 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004

Amount(dol.)

Percentof

U.S.average

ILLINOIS—Con.

Union . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,495 8,360 135 508 545 6.0 6.5 357 –7 3,895 –886 22,347 60.4Vermilion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38,274 38,883 –609 2,174 2,323 5.7 6.0 1,672 –82 27,102 –1,881 28,768 77.8Wabash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,577 6,883 –306 315 361 4.8 5.2 296 –23 3,504 –327 24,631 66.6Warren . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,058 10,044 –986 423 442 4.7 4.4 394 11 5,629 600 22,131 59.9Washington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,573 8,349 224 333 332 3.9 4.0 421 8 5,616 397 25,425 68.8

Wayne . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,282 8,397 –115 359 497 4.3 5.9 370 –3 3,609 –252 24,289 65.7White. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,956 7,481 475 384 374 4.8 5.0 404 –22 3,845 260 24,809 67.1Whiteside . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30,660 30,861 –201 1,606 1,311 5.2 4.2 1,396 –59 18,791 –2,728 26,478 71.6Will . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 345,717 278,741 66,976 14,703 11,333 4.3 4.1 12,108 2,053 161,695 18,900 36,090 97.6Williamson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35,500 29,912 5,588 1,696 1,831 4.8 6.1 1,597 22 24,012 1,221 26,116 70.6Winnebago . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146,715 146,439 276 7,738 6,771 5.3 4.6 6,973 –73 127,956 –7,780 31,975 86.5Woodford . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21,052 18,756 2,296 659 643 3.1 3.4 758 32 8,255 –452 27,724 75.0

INDIANA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,271,496 3,144,379 127,117 162,690 91,660 5.0 2.9 3149,381 33,060 32,586,799 3–63,975 332,897 389.0

Adams. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,398 16,652 –254 713 435 4.3 2.6 795 7 13,499 –838 27,490 74.4Allen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 184,398 176,766 7,632 9,121 4,610 4.9 2.6 9,333 384 169,886 –9,097 33,261 90.0Bartholomew. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38,519 37,520 999 1,605 946 4.2 2.5 1,867 –105 36,830 –1,735 37,832 102.3Benton. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,704 4,859 –155 229 136 4.9 2.8 229 –23 1,880 –226 23,299 63.0Blackford . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,790 7,063 –273 443 292 6.5 4.1 285 –1 3,391 –856 26,730 72.3

Boone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27,997 24,412 3,585 1,038 493 3.7 2.0 1,330 66 13,317 576 27,725 75.0Brown . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,203 7,919 284 393 220 4.8 2.8 387 4 2,341 70 19,425 52.5Carroll . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,736 10,560 176 496 287 4.6 2.7 414 5 4,392 –686 24,748 66.9Cass . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,082 20,766 –1,684 1,033 607 5.4 2.9 826 –26 14,974 –1,453 25,143 68.0Clark . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55,270 52,760 2,510 2,710 1,810 4.9 3.4 2,571 118 42,809 819 29,336 79.4

Clay . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,383 12,913 470 750 509 5.6 3.9 513 –16 6,133 134 23,340 63.1Clinton. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,196 16,554 642 859 460 5.0 2.8 676 28 9,706 –578 28,837 78.0Crawford . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,375 5,135 240 379 237 7.1 4.6 142 –3 1,012 –202 19,364 52.4Daviess . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,252 14,169 1,083 551 402 3.6 2.8 736 –13 8,863 49 23,517 63.6Dearborn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26,919 24,603 2,316 1,407 779 5.2 3.2 1,021 48 14,216 894 30,370 82.2

Decatur . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,631 13,509 –878 550 290 4.4 2.1 630 11 11,450 –1,349 30,615 82.8DeKalb . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21,767 21,825 –58 1,311 629 6.0 2.9 1,035 66 21,691 –280 33,689 91.1Delaware . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57,609 58,964 –1,355 3,420 1,958 5.9 3.3 2,638 –60 44,035 –6,428 27,739 75.0Dubois . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22,611 22,285 326 811 472 3.6 2.1 1,296 37 26,910 –1,886 31,875 86.2Elkhart . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105,777 97,347 8,430 4,897 2,462 4.6 2.5 5,149 137 118,921 567 33,727 91.2

Fayette . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,926 12,462 –1,536 872 517 8.0 4.1 533 –5 7,828 –1,828 33,358 90.2Floyd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38,785 38,248 537 1,859 1,254 4.8 3.3 1,819 98 25,689 –1,070 28,714 77.7Fountain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,875 8,700 175 424 258 4.8 3.0 371 –7 4,572 –458 27,185 73.5Franklin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,246 11,379 867 698 383 5.7 3.4 381 21 3,744 –244 22,947 62.1Fulton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,603 10,815 –212 561 417 5.3 3.9 474 –31 6,514 54 28,143 76.1

Gibson. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,584 16,825 759 782 533 4.4 3.2 732 –17 15,274 3,209 42,307 114.4Grant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33,382 34,997 –1,615 2,335 1,321 7.0 3.8 1,511 –27 26,758 –4,498 28,355 76.7Greene . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,938 16,100 838 946 741 5.6 4.6 625 –18 5,446 –518 21,938 59.3Hamilton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134,885 101,907 32,978 4,383 1,823 3.2 1.8 6,242 922 91,453 11,588 38,343 103.7Hancock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35,526 30,582 4,944 1,440 665 4.1 2.2 1,390 125 17,376 3,241 32,699 88.5

Harrison. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,174 18,817 1,357 1,067 603 5.3 3.2 709 58 10,816 2,350 25,429 68.8Hendricks. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71,508 57,835 13,673 2,590 1,095 3.6 1.9 2,487 340 34,861 8,350 28,607 77.4Henry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22,988 23,460 –472 1,334 866 5.8 3.7 929 –33 11,363 –1,287 26,366 71.3Howard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39,375 41,719 –2,344 2,564 1,272 6.5 3.0 2,008 38 39,312 –5,497 41,331 111.8Huntington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,887 20,898 –11 1,094 612 5.2 2.9 936 55 15,279 –505 26,381 71.4

Jackson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22,453 21,823 630 977 557 4.4 2.6 1,076 1 19,193 –24 29,108 78.7Jasper . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,526 14,780 746 787 483 5.1 3.3 801 19 11,420 1,385 27,469 74.3Jay . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,876 11,036 840 532 354 4.5 3.2 436 –1 6,027 –880 28,143 76.1Jefferson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,667 16,259 1,408 849 513 4.8 3.2 772 42 12,620 561 28,365 76.7Jennings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,970 14,132 –162 811 387 5.8 2.7 442 2 6,733 –274 28,302 76.6

Johnson. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72,115 63,629 8,486 2,803 1,306 3.9 2.1 2,943 310 43,328 3,589 26,430 71.5Knox . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,382 19,574 –192 926 687 4.8 3.5 1,014 –14 14,036 –26 26,022 70.4Kosciusko . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42,570 39,480 3,090 2,055 935 4.8 2.4 1,922 26 33,322 566 37,181 100.6LaGrange. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,799 16,995 804 906 387 5.1 2.3 768 64 11,474 47 31,620 85.5Lake . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 230,345 226,616 3,729 13,249 8,221 5.8 3.6 10,207 165 173,109 –6,114 33,410 90.4

LaPorte . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53,734 54,111 –377 3,060 1,798 5.7 3.3 2,555 –80 35,318 –4,959 29,382 79.5Lawrence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23,158 23,031 127 1,594 890 6.9 3.9 950 13 12,400 –1,569 30,617 82.8Madison. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63,189 63,788 –599 3,804 1,913 6.0 3.0 2,661 –112 39,159 –3,187 28,591 77.3Marion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 471,981 457,920 14,061 22,976 12,270 4.9 2.7 24,384 –4 534,364 –30,301 38,848 105.1Marshall . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23,377 23,434 –57 1,236 694 5.3 3.0 1,110 –19 16,807 –1,607 26,211 70.9

Martin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,369 5,100 269 261 165 4.9 3.2 236 –10 2,552 75 24,149 65.3Miami . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,327 17,662 –335 1,066 574 6.2 3.2 684 2 8,096 –139 24,731 66.9Monroe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67,857 64,138 3,719 2,895 1,668 4.3 2.6 3,018 92 50,620 3,273 29,871 80.8Montgomery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,015 19,778 237 829 495 4.1 2.5 897 –21 14,455 –1,024 32,159 87.0Morgan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38,288 35,761 2,527 1,709 845 4.5 2.4 1,371 64 14,297 494 26,826 72.6

Newton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,236 7,297 –61 357 208 4.9 2.9 293 4 3,144 –64 26,202 70.9Noble . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23,930 24,560 –630 1,450 679 6.1 2.8 950 34 16,999 –2,465 29,656 80.2Ohio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,223 3,002 221 167 99 5.2 3.3 87 10 1,517 –278 25,949 70.2Orange . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,657 9,630 27 693 405 7.2 4.2 402 9 5,216 –1,608 25,683 69.5Owen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,916 10,804 1,112 628 319 5.3 3.0 325 10 3,873 346 23,815 64.4





County





2004

2006 2000

Netchange,

2000–2006 2006 2000 2006 2000 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004

Amount(dol.)

Percentof

U.S.average

INDIANA—Con.

Parke . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,015 8,059 –44 443 271 5.5 3.4 280 –22 2,360 –93 20,278 54.9Perry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,873 9,535 338 506 428 5.1 4.5 383 –3 5,404 676 25,966 70.2Pike . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,248 6,382 –134 283 214 4.5 3.4 193 3 2,669 569 33,456 90.5Porter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82,916 77,901 5,015 3,630 2,137 4.4 2.7 3,542 255 50,424 247 33,046 89.4Posey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,086 13,928 158 611 405 4.3 2.9 521 –10 7,356 –199 41,813 113.1

Pulaski. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,955 6,789 166 316 284 4.5 4.2 358 1 3,552 186 28,783 77.9Putnam . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18,157 17,207 950 965 479 5.3 2.8 673 –10 11,666 681 26,033 70.4Randolph . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,003 13,596 –593 890 491 6.8 3.6 546 –31 6,639 54 27,758 75.1Ripley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,548 13,792 756 696 339 4.8 2.5 748 6 12,509 308 42,412 114.7Rush . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,620 9,514 106 432 239 4.5 2.5 418 4 4,382 –202 27,313 73.9

St. Joseph . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136,217 135,041 1,176 6,988 4,148 5.1 3.1 6,370 –187 119,802 –5,290 32,179 87.0Scott . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,566 11,340 226 741 362 6.4 3.2 466 13 6,825 –93 24,558 66.4Shelby . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24,335 23,686 649 1,067 604 4.4 2.6 995 35 17,726 2,279 30,470 82.4Spencer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,784 11,039 –255 532 375 4.9 3.4 416 1 5,643 –1,486 30,943 83.7Starke . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,666 10,882 –216 699 502 6.6 4.6 324 –20 3,335 –530 22,933 62.0

Steuben . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,793 18,574 –1,781 1,065 538 6.3 2.9 1,031 13 14,625 –6,645 26,707 72.2Sullivan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,331 9,261 70 556 466 6.0 5.0 377 –10 3,591 –280 25,711 69.5Switzerland. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,730 5,030 700 234 235 4.1 4.7 123 1 1,861 879 26,338 71.2Tippecanoe. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81,016 78,405 2,611 3,429 1,994 4.2 2.5 3,292 100 60,336 –5,073 31,871 86.2Tipton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,095 8,726 –631 439 224 5.4 2.6 348 28 3,745 –48 28,921 78.2

Union . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,928 3,812 116 215 113 5.5 3.0 136 –7 806 –163 21,109 57.1Vanderburgh . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92,920 90,188 2,732 4,403 2,775 4.7 3.1 5,147 –105 108,181 –2,961 30,899 83.6Vermillion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,216 8,170 46 535 364 6.5 4.5 279 –9 4,662 –209 33,935 91.8Vigo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50,667 51,023 –356 3,213 1,980 6.3 3.9 2,666 24 48,593 651 26,947 72.9Wabash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,934 18,166 –232 990 517 5.5 2.8 842 –3 13,378 –33 25,405 68.7

Warren . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,845 4,508 337 195 115 4.0 2.6 137 29 1,336 294 26,903 72.8Warrick . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31,097 28,566 2,531 1,299 901 4.2 3.2 1,105 68 12,422 761 31,166 84.3Washington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,548 14,106 442 886 513 6.1 3.6 481 13 5,610 –244 24,233 65.6Wayne . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34,406 35,681 –1,275 2,021 1,242 5.9 3.5 1,691 –18 29,890 –3,427 29,042 78.6Wells . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,288 14,964 324 656 352 4.3 2.4 631 23 10,114 –1,305 25,791 69.8White. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,231 13,661 –1,430 615 389 5.0 2.8 659 –40 6,764 –2,583 25,885 70.0Whitley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18,214 17,185 1,029 861 422 4.7 2.5 679 –17 10,399 –1,237 27,792 75.2

IOWA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,664,339 1,601,920 62,419 61,490 44,839 3.7 2.8 381,565 3675 31,241,864 3–23,200 330,312 382.0

Adair . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,475 4,481 –6 145 123 3.2 2.7 186 –31 2,052 –249 24,312 65.8Adams. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,084 2,346 –262 95 92 4.6 3.9 123 –2 968 –95 22,483 60.8Allamakee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,229 8,005 224 382 286 4.6 3.6 413 1 4,773 –124 23,519 63.6Appanoose . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,446 6,381 65 346 291 5.4 4.6 348 19 3,839 155 25,696 69.5Audubon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,269 3,433 –164 134 103 4.1 3.0 206 –5 1,383 –93 22,380 60.5

Benton. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,775 13,764 1,011 584 337 4.0 2.4 599 –36 4,641 4 25,142 68.0Black Hawk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72,433 68,937 3,496 2,805 2,029 3.9 2.9 3,167 –2 61,689 1,363 29,167 78.9Boone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,617 14,679 938 461 331 3.0 2.3 582 8 6,973 –72 26,167 70.8Bremer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,917 12,865 1,052 452 336 3.2 2.6 642 1 7,735 –295 28,908 78.2Buchanan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,391 10,732 659 484 319 4.2 3.0 548 10 5,301 –62 26,830 72.6

Buena Vista . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,493 10,320 173 352 254 3.4 2.5 595 –7 9,025 606 22,567 61.0Butler . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,352 8,037 315 343 269 4.1 3.3 367 –8 2,246 –59 23,145 62.6Calhoun . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,275 5,371 –96 181 154 3.4 2.9 289 –20 2,201 –94 20,950 56.7Carroll . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,477 12,013 464 332 281 2.7 2.3 857 20 11,139 957 24,535 66.4Cass . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,669 7,927 –258 330 295 4.3 3.7 484 –13 4,939 –817 23,613 63.9

Cedar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,819 10,426 393 352 247 3.3 2.4 486 –8 3,629 –484 21,867 59.2Cerro Gordo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26,424 25,357 1,067 1,031 775 3.9 3.1 1,460 –27 22,322 –944 28,911 78.2Cherokee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,571 6,995 –424 278 170 4.2 2.4 395 5 4,236 –257 25,911 70.1Chickasaw . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,499 6,927 –428 295 462 4.5 6.7 399 –3 3,296 –1,001 25,380 68.7Clarke . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,743 4,903 –160 197 162 4.2 3.3 213 –14 3,272 –851 22,964 62.1

Clay . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,921 10,005 –84 329 257 3.3 2.6 620 –23 7,389 –752 26,925 72.8Clayton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,694 10,286 –592 494 369 5.1 3.6 532 5 4,870 –974 24,367 65.9Clinton. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27,240 26,264 976 1,077 947 4.0 3.6 1,325 54 18,995 –290 26,630 72.0Crawford . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,341 8,956 385 293 233 3.1 2.6 468 2 6,034 322 26,521 71.7Dallas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30,359 23,647 6,712 874 484 2.9 2.0 1,078 261 14,840 5,044 32,351 87.5

Davis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,146 4,184 –38 197 143 4.8 3.4 183 4 1,520 –83 22,023 59.6Decatur . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,225 4,293 –68 174 150 4.1 3.5 166 4 2,220 –74 16,368 44.3Delaware . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,815 10,225 590 402 305 3.7 3.0 496 13 4,666 –247 25,002 67.6Des Moines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21,131 22,417 –1,286 1,004 820 4.8 3.7 1,193 –28 19,704 –1,393 28,767 77.8Dickinson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,188 9,498 690 410 271 4.0 2.9 752 48 7,773 1 26,282 71.1

Dubuque . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52,731 48,739 3,992 1,926 1,656 3.7 3.4 2,709 50 47,897 –2,091 29,660 80.2Emmet. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,093 6,045 48 248 180 4.1 3.0 347 34 3,584 91 24,628 66.6Fayette . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,113 11,268 –155 511 443 4.6 3.9 620 –37 6,584 –942 21,492 58.1Floyd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,863 8,548 315 417 331 4.7 3.9 431 –22 4,355 –242 24,884 67.3Franklin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,860 5,724 136 227 163 3.9 2.8 321 –15 2,708 –488 25,745 69.6

Fremont . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,959 4,252 –293 151 104 3.8 2.4 182 –11 1,302 –226 24,366 65.9Greene . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,074 5,013 61 202 170 4.0 3.4 310 11 2,897 226 20,537 55.6Grundy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,949 6,552 397 214 159 3.1 2.4 309 1 3,054 185 29,683 80.3Guthrie . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,303 6,085 218 228 171 3.6 2.8 322 22 2,301 433 25,621 69.3Hamilton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,852 8,990 –138 320 234 3.6 2.6 418 –33 6,429 –508 27,612 74.7





County





2004

2006 2000

Netchange,

2000–2006 2006 2000 2006 2000 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004

Amount(dol.)

Percentof

U.S.average

IOWA—Con.

Hancock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,164 6,349 –185 225 144 3.7 2.3 315 –24 3,195 149 24,831 67.2Hardin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,210 9,548 –338 349 303 3.8 3.2 585 –51 5,816 –1,395 24,738 66.9Harrison. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,247 8,124 123 342 229 4.1 2.8 341 –25 2,696 –546 22,372 60.5Henry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,634 10,620 14 561 332 5.3 3.1 570 5 12,179 121 25,427 68.8Howard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,288 5,152 136 193 170 3.6 3.3 272 –4 3,598 12 24,595 66.5

Humboldt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,224 5,297 –73 176 141 3.4 2.7 343 12 3,445 –126 26,421 71.5Ida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,987 4,006 –19 140 90 3.5 2.2 266 2 2,816 –508 29,197 79.0Iowa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,972 8,884 88 327 195 3.6 2.2 504 4 8,403 –882 27,447 74.2Jackson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,353 11,207 146 544 424 4.8 3.8 599 26 5,420 63 20,664 55.9Jasper . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18,433 19,907 –1,474 944 518 5.1 2.6 823 –19 12,826 –931 30,986 83.8

Jefferson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,269 9,086 –817 353 275 4.3 3.0 677 –22 6,816 –475 27,730 75.0Johnson. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76,074 67,613 8,461 2,005 1,353 2.6 2.0 2,859 193 53,876 2,789 30,670 83.0Jones . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,661 10,475 186 414 294 3.9 2.8 533 32 4,555 9 24,498 66.3Keokuk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,891 5,853 38 238 195 4.0 3.3 265 –6 2,002 156 21,536 58.3Kossuth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,083 8,882 201 301 236 3.3 2.7 572 28 5,227 –289 25,159 68.1

Lee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,534 18,756 –1,222 1,088 881 6.2 4.7 1,007 –37 14,299 –2,235 28,391 76.8Linn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116,124 111,721 4,403 4,231 2,709 3.6 2.4 5,431 123 104,433 –10,160 35,131 95.0Louisa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,479 6,284 195 247 196 3.8 3.1 236 21 2,872 25 25,508 69.0Lucas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,977 4,764 213 207 137 4.2 2.9 207 –11 2,699 –8 27,892 75.5Lyon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,682 6,391 291 158 132 2.4 2.1 371 2 2,561 92 21,159 57.2

Madison. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,387 7,656 731 332 254 4.0 3.3 365 20 2,666 –108 23,919 64.7Mahaska . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,907 11,588 319 439 288 3.7 2.5 595 9 6,399 98 25,343 68.6Marion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18,015 17,701 314 633 414 3.5 2.3 854 44 15,829 –2,327 31,860 86.2Marshall . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,932 20,704 228 786 591 3.8 2.9 880 –42 15,190 –316 28,947 78.3Mills . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,374 7,937 437 308 168 3.7 2.1 286 46 2,140 –561 21,245 57.5

Mitchell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,466 5,482 –16 188 155 3.4 2.8 337 –13 3,017 –90 25,233 68.3Monona . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,705 5,008 –303 256 160 5.4 3.2 274 –17 2,585 –99 21,149 57.2Monroe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,166 3,923 243 171 126 4.1 3.2 177 –30 1,729 –870 20,542 55.6Montgomery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,905 6,034 –129 321 202 5.4 3.3 326 –21 3,916 –507 25,433 68.8Muscatine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24,192 22,391 1,801 781 643 3.2 2.9 972 –26 19,382 –919 37,698 102.0

O’Brien . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,826 7,803 23 239 184 3.1 2.4 540 –22 5,099 –50 22,403 60.6Osceola . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,441 3,628 –187 120 93 3.5 2.6 206 –4 1,895 89 25,045 67.7Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,402 8,393 9 325 278 3.9 3.3 486 –15 6,356 –469 26,910 72.8Palo Alto . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,400 5,226 174 177 124 3.3 2.4 315 –1 2,928 230 22,879 61.9Plymouth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,419 13,573 846 460 362 3.2 2.7 717 39 9,135 –114 30,054 81.3

Pocahontas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,102 4,219 –117 130 119 3.2 2.8 243 –34 1,779 –377 22,274 60.3Polk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 234,879 215,941 18,938 8,011 5,383 3.4 2.5 11,805 282 245,103 981 37,679 101.9Pottawattamie . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49,685 48,322 1,363 2,111 1,204 4.2 2.5 1,982 73 30,530 1,461 26,588 71.9Poweshiek . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,687 10,412 275 411 294 3.8 2.8 589 24 9,159 65 28,645 77.5Ringgold . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,472 2,599 –127 101 79 4.1 3.0 137 – 974 –146 19,508 52.8

Sac . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,892 5,984 –92 198 161 3.4 2.7 366 –25 2,643 42 19,418 52.5Scott . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88,812 86,140 2,672 3,338 2,922 3.8 3.4 4,508 77 81,549 –223 30,238 81.8Shelby . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,376 7,115 261 239 174 3.2 2.4 417 –16 4,437 –106 23,194 62.7Sioux. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,382 17,696 1,686 484 360 2.5 2.0 1,142 49 15,521 512 24,814 67.1Story . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48,122 46,571 1,551 1,280 890 2.7 1.9 1,958 25 27,503 –999 26,511 71.7

Tama. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,987 9,288 –301 383 329 4.3 3.5 393 –19 4,069 –260 25,335 68.5Taylor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,432 3,501 –69 133 115 3.9 3.3 146 –22 1,268 –28 22,645 61.3Union . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,487 6,604 –117 263 232 4.1 3.5 359 4 4,738 –216 24,226 65.5Van Buren . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,943 4,015 –72 170 133 4.3 3.3 160 –15 1,557 –230 24,441 66.1Wapello . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18,871 17,966 905 851 668 4.5 3.7 836 –28 14,835 1,472 29,262 79.2

Warren . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25,379 23,632 1,747 814 539 3.2 2.3 793 14 7,461 –118 22,067 59.7Washington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,593 11,375 1,218 377 272 3.0 2.4 664 –45 5,578 –314 22,398 60.6Wayne . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,199 3,254 –55 130 100 4.1 3.1 176 –6 1,345 –129 21,031 56.9Webster . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,981 20,011 –30 782 635 3.9 3.2 1,144 –36 15,380 –1,099 29,611 80.1Winnebago . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,850 6,477 –627 210 135 3.6 2.1 356 –7 8,575 398 29,819 80.7

Winneshiek. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,295 12,229 66 459 328 3.7 2.7 614 –9 9,904 –120 24,098 65.2Woodbury. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54,438 55,718 –1,280 2,323 1,529 4.3 2.7 2,816 –116 44,694 –2,855 27,226 73.6Worth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,648 4,384 264 175 135 3.8 3.1 186 6 1,366 –109 25,416 68.8Wright . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,197 7,624 –427 266 205 3.7 2.7 410 –43 4,408 –680 25,827 69.9

KANSAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,466,004 1,405,104 60,900 65,835 53,116 4.5 3.8 375,827 3888 31,116,277 3–12,455 332,004 386.6

Allen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,086 7,224 –138 323 333 4.6 4.6 398 –18 4,869 –334 23,856 64.5Anderson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,074 4,118 –44 209 171 5.1 4.2 231 –6 1,513 –95 20,322 55.0Atchison. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,570 8,453 117 427 377 5.0 4.5 403 3 6,737 765 23,449 63.4Barber . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,621 2,671 –50 88 72 3.4 2.7 211 –2 1,291 –98 23,590 63.8Barton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,998 14,545 453 558 487 3.7 3.3 994 –35 10,594 –196 25,805 69.8

Bourbon. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,532 8,110 422 367 316 4.3 3.9 403 –34 5,198 –1,525 24,540 66.4Brown . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,483 5,355 128 226 270 4.1 5.0 243 –26 3,186 –64 22,943 62.1Butler . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32,123 30,378 1,745 1,506 1,267 4.7 4.2 1,328 47 11,948 –46 25,863 70.0Chase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,757 1,625 132 71 48 4.0 3.0 57 –15 312 –160 18,804 50.9Chautauqua . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,871 1,931 –60 101 81 5.4 4.2 95 5 678 85 17,499 47.3





County





2004

2006 2000

Netchange,

2000–2006 2006 2000 2006 2000 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004

Amount(dol.)

Percentof

U.S.average

KANSAS—Con.

Cherokee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,969 10,892 77 564 531 5.1 4.9 376 –25 5,167 –39 26,144 70.7Cheyenne . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,463 1,634 –171 53 40 3.6 2.4 105 –9 581 26 19,120 51.7Clark . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,179 1,234 –55 41 33 3.5 2.7 81 5 423 –25 21,934 59.3Clay . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,886 4,590 296 175 150 3.6 3.3 297 12 2,440 –155 19,892 53.8Cloud . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,478 5,227 251 206 191 3.8 3.7 333 –16 2,974 –140 21,463 58.1

Coffey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,117 4,794 323 266 179 5.2 3.7 255 –6 2,625 –183 40,868 110.6Comanche . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,081 1,033 48 33 23 3.1 2.2 85 15 397 –26 18,788 50.8Cowley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,379 17,600 –221 813 814 4.7 4.6 815 –21 11,705 892 28,891 78.2Crawford . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,476 19,227 1,249 1,018 854 5.0 4.4 983 –34 14,464 –134 23,559 63.7Decatur . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,686 1,751 –65 58 42 3.4 2.4 110 –17 657 –139 16,855 45.6

Dickinson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,594 10,427 167 432 332 4.1 3.2 547 –18 5,463 –439 23,610 63.9Doniphan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,472 4,083 389 225 206 5.0 5.0 149 –32 1,256 –791 22,868 61.9Douglas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61,846 57,774 4,072 2,319 1,717 3.7 3.0 2,742 118 35,792 –1,693 24,437 66.1Edwards. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,766 1,738 28 56 44 3.2 2.5 99 –8 583 –102 25,528 69.1Elk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,421 1,444 –23 74 70 5.2 4.8 74 9 315 31 16,098 43.5

Ellis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,363 15,596 767 488 417 3.0 2.7 1,063 18 12,131 –162 23,399 63.3Ellsworth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,508 3,167 341 124 107 3.5 3.4 181 –10 1,708 –35 24,508 66.3Finney . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18,066 19,858 –1,792 656 557 3.6 2.8 1,012 –8 14,659 –2,096 25,778 69.7Ford . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,125 16,236 889 562 435 3.3 2.7 824 –12 13,591 261 26,385 71.4Franklin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,876 13,086 790 726 507 5.2 3.9 617 34 8,335 623 25,198 68.2

Geary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,408 11,647 –239 611 575 5.4 4.9 519 –68 6,526 –1,807 21,590 58.4Gove . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,504 1,599 –95 45 34 3.0 2.1 134 – 833 –1 19,214 52.0Graham . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,413 1,456 –43 49 40 3.5 2.7 107 –3 644 –45 18,379 49.7Grant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,747 3,775 –28 119 113 3.2 3.0 239 –15 2,209 –81 29,940 81.0Gray . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,144 3,020 124 96 80 3.1 2.6 217 10 1,236 –46 25,892 70.0

Greeley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 720 787 –67 25 25 3.5 3.2 52 –8 317 –36 20,710 56.0Greenwood. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,601 3,766 –165 172 178 4.8 4.7 211 –17 1,205 –175 21,207 57.4Hamilton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,296 1,287 9 43 35 3.3 2.7 77 –7 591 –315 22,147 59.9Harper . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,374 3,201 173 117 115 3.5 3.6 231 2 1,561 123 24,966 67.5Harvey. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18,230 17,452 778 815 645 4.5 3.7 853 35 12,300 584 26,529 71.8

Haskell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,150 2,104 46 64 51 3.0 2.4 115 1 786 70 24,822 67.1Hodgeman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 958 1,018 –60 36 34 3.8 3.3 50 2 245 –106 19,702 53.3Jackson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,016 6,604 412 382 286 5.4 4.3 285 – 3,260 –38 23,928 64.7Jefferson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,945 9,687 258 479 388 4.8 4.0 349 –26 2,441 236 24,015 65.0Jewell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,059 1,949 110 61 48 3.0 2.5 96 –13 499 –44 19,665 53.2

Johnson. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 291,371 260,814 30,557 12,227 7,934 4.2 3.0 16,799 905 286,400 3,748 39,501 106.9Kearny. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,032 2,076 –44 80 58 3.9 2.8 83 –3 532 –58 22,799 61.7Kingman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,326 4,285 41 168 153 3.9 3.6 217 –1 1,894 –97 22,746 61.5Kiowa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,608 1,664 –56 51 44 3.2 2.6 104 –10 836 –121 22,616 61.2Labette . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,697 11,566 –869 588 564 5.5 4.9 509 –16 8,210 27 23,309 63.1

Lane . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,057 1,126 –69 39 31 3.7 2.8 73 –13 342 –45 22,944 62.1Leavenworth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33,106 31,053 2,053 1,873 1,312 5.7 4.2 1,175 52 15,210 166 29,681 80.3Lincoln. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,812 1,907 –95 68 52 3.8 2.7 108 1 617 21 15,951 43.2Linn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,873 4,703 170 307 238 6.3 5.1 188 –5 1,292 –89 32,378 87.6Logan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,515 1,637 –122 50 56 3.3 3.4 141 4 856 105 20,856 56.4

Lyon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,224 19,202 1,022 838 602 4.1 3.1 915 7 15,610 268 24,167 65.4McPherson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,850 15,739 2,111 601 456 3.4 2.9 936 –4 13,198 356 28,082 76.0Marion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,761 6,747 14 278 201 4.1 3.0 342 –10 2,948 –126 19,109 51.7Marshall . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,869 5,709 160 211 196 3.6 3.4 383 –5 3,676 264 24,805 67.1Meade . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,114 2,201 –87 71 59 3.4 2.7 137 –12 759 –133 23,733 64.2

Miami . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,340 15,225 1,115 759 525 4.6 3.4 759 141 6,707 –161 25,259 68.3Mitchell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,388 3,536 –148 124 94 3.7 2.7 274 –3 2,579 –35 23,501 63.6Montgomery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,178 17,950 –772 836 898 4.9 5.0 976 –47 14,005 –861 25,964 70.2Morris . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,889 3,190 –301 130 109 4.5 3.4 134 –20 1,073 –149 22,250 60.2Morton. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,703 1,760 –57 52 50 3.1 2.8 110 –11 704 –173 27,744 75.1

Nemaha. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,324 5,246 78 189 147 3.5 2.8 386 –4 4,200 284 23,810 64.4Neosho . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,655 8,483 172 378 378 4.4 4.5 544 6 6,403 –380 23,757 64.3Ness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,672 1,849 –177 51 43 3.1 2.3 140 –17 823 –190 25,838 69.9Norton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,713 2,659 54 93 83 3.4 3.1 197 –20 1,849 –2 24,696 66.8Osage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,912 8,773 139 493 407 5.5 4.6 313 –36 2,932 –546 14,859 40.2

Osborne. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,324 2,323 1 81 59 3.5 2.5 160 –6 1,262 –38 16,970 45.9Ottawa. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,436 3,274 162 121 105 3.5 3.2 138 14 895 63 20,867 56.4Pawnee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,834 3,566 268 139 99 3.6 2.8 172 –12 1,756 –225 29,363 79.4Phillips. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,028 3,121 –93 100 85 3.3 2.7 227 –10 1,807 84 23,614 63.9Pottawatomie . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,065 9,602 1,463 383 319 3.5 3.3 510 15 6,194 300 27,047 73.2

Pratt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,386 5,058 328 173 137 3.2 2.7 418 35 3,398 404 24,297 65.7Rawlins . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,354 1,476 –122 45 41 3.3 2.8 109 10 684 124 19,658 53.2Reno . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33,119 32,572 547 1,519 1,240 4.6 3.8 1,767 44 23,279 –2,918 27,097 73.3Republic. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,767 3,008 –241 104 83 3.8 2.8 191 –22 1,406 –485 19,248 52.1Rice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,424 5,367 57 239 194 4.4 3.6 293 –14 2,677 61 23,172 62.7





County





2004

2006 2000

Netchange,

2000–2006 2006 2000 2006 2000 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004

Amount(dol.)

Percentof

U.S.average

KANSAS—Con.

Riley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34,905 31,561 3,344 1,205 950 3.5 3.0 1,542 143 21,634 1,977 20,968 56.7Rooks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,624 2,836 –212 105 88 4.0 3.1 199 –9 1,244 –99 23,623 63.9Rush . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,669 1,784 –115 64 58 3.8 3.3 106 5 871 –62 25,171 68.1Russell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,396 3,575 –179 138 141 4.1 3.9 274 –17 1,807 –379 18,379 49.7Saline . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31,100 29,043 2,057 1,180 927 3.8 3.2 1,692 –7 27,332 981 27,027 73.1

Scott . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,804 2,999 –195 81 66 2.9 2.2 192 –22 1,189 –266 24,672 66.7Sedgwick . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 245,677 236,415 9,262 11,495 10,088 4.7 4.3 11,963 75 234,214 3,218 35,549 96.2Seward . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,252 10,255 –3 367 323 3.6 3.1 629 –49 9,058 –776 26,089 70.6Shawnee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91,240 90,759 481 4,431 3,709 4.9 4.1 4,730 130 74,734 –9,855 30,579 82.7Sheridan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,518 1,497 21 45 32 3.0 2.1 104 –3 603 – 22,095 59.8

Sherman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,932 3,616 –684 113 102 3.9 2.8 263 –20 1,876 –245 20,386 55.1Smith. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,183 2,227 –44 78 57 3.6 2.6 161 –4 1,115 23 18,183 49.2Stafford . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,207 2,360 –153 83 72 3.8 3.1 160 7 800 –132 20,966 56.7Stanton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,128 1,293 –165 33 32 2.9 2.5 79 6 401 –20 23,307 63.0Stevens . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,362 2,545 –183 84 72 3.6 2.8 165 –5 1,224 –2 25,641 69.4

Sumner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,265 12,769 –504 585 611 4.8 4.8 531 –14 4,348 –513 23,387 63.3Thomas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,356 4,284 72 136 106 3.1 2.5 357 4 2,650 –30 20,371 55.1Trego . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,719 1,690 29 56 40 3.3 2.4 136 11 685 –52 19,550 52.9Wabaunsee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,687 3,708 –21 142 127 3.9 3.4 121 –7 809 108 19,634 53.1Wallace . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 905 938 –33 30 20 3.3 2.1 57 –4 324 –24 17,642 47.7

Washington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,339 3,464 –125 120 114 3.6 3.3 215 –24 1,599 –11 18,351 49.6Wichita . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,281 1,257 24 40 37 3.1 2.9 91 1 397 –31 25,476 68.9Wilson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,478 5,069 409 211 197 3.9 3.9 254 –6 3,800 265 28,114 76.1Woodson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,687 1,741 –54 86 82 5.1 4.7 100 –9 519 –85 17,362 47.0Wyandotte . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73,137 73,804 –667 5,589 4,701 7.6 6.4 2,962 –119 59,658 –1,930 37,489 101.4

KENTUCKY. . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,038,971 1,949,013 89,958 116,808 82,665 5.7 4.2 391,797 31,876 31,489,497 3–24,225 330,992 383.8

Adair . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,879 8,168 711 507 413 5.7 5.1 314 9 3,508 83 20,571 55.6Allen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,458 8,444 14 552 374 6.5 4.4 220 13 3,434 –893 25,880 70.0Anderson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,897 10,152 745 570 352 5.2 3.5 295 20 3,182 –324 28,048 75.9Ballard. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,171 4,203 –32 260 252 6.2 6.0 167 –2 1,851 –118 35,534 96.1Barren . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,670 19,254 416 1,106 892 5.6 4.6 858 1 14,437 –511 26,840 72.6

Bath . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,196 4,930 266 399 307 7.7 6.2 142 –30 1,550 74 22,403 60.6Bell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,698 9,864 –166 761 653 7.8 6.6 585 –48 7,193 –791 24,430 66.1Boone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60,561 48,904 11,657 2,862 1,465 4.7 3.0 2,678 276 58,611 119 34,096 92.2Bourbon. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,969 9,950 19 492 337 4.9 3.4 406 10 6,111 679 31,216 84.4Boyd . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23,320 21,387 1,933 1,287 1,251 5.5 5.8 1,491 14 24,089 –1,397 32,885 89.0

Boyle. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,920 13,467 –547 870 541 6.7 4.0 792 15 13,846 –1,559 27,211 73.6Bracken . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,441 4,173 268 251 149 5.7 3.6 116 – 927 –187 24,393 66.0Breathitt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,699 5,380 319 424 367 7.4 6.8 218 3 2,149 –244 20,781 56.2Breckinridge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,155 8,628 527 616 415 6.7 4.8 295 –3 2,209 –47 21,530 58.2Bullitt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36,964 33,363 3,601 2,218 1,095 6.0 3.3 980 56 11,729 1,032 25,867 70.0

Butler . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,885 6,583 –698 459 271 7.8 4.1 200 –9 2,781 –634 22,093 59.8Caldwell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,725 6,177 548 350 273 5.2 4.4 292 18 3,131 111 25,039 67.7Calloway . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18,147 17,232 915 1,025 682 5.6 4.0 791 13 11,965 –4 24,236 65.6Campbell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46,331 46,433 –102 2,342 1,552 5.1 3.3 1,660 45 25,989 2,618 29,133 78.8Carlisle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,314 2,398 –84 142 146 6.1 6.1 74 –5 558 –41 17,557 47.5

Carroll . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,751 4,954 797 318 217 5.5 4.4 243 10 5,604 312 42,183 114.1Carter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,791 11,704 2,087 1,050 853 7.6 7.3 432 –10 5,999 1,683 18,498 50.0Casey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,539 6,839 700 515 315 6.8 4.6 204 3 2,594 207 18,891 51.1Christian . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27,195 26,356 839 1,791 1,277 6.6 4.8 1,354 32 25,140 2,548 27,213 73.6Clark . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,431 16,950 481 952 642 5.5 3.8 803 39 12,829 360 28,342 76.7

Clay . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,116 7,209 –93 713 487 10.0 6.8 281 –20 2,584 –542 21,385 57.8Clinton. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,544 4,510 34 273 228 6.0 5.1 199 9 3,228 194 22,882 61.9Crittenden . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,059 4,334 –275 249 279 6.1 6.4 167 –5 1,840 233 19,053 51.5Cumberland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,054 3,172 –118 224 180 7.3 5.7 127 8 1,134 –48 20,011 54.1Daviess . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47,413 46,724 689 2,536 2,039 5.3 4.4 2,356 –53 37,126 –4,129 27,511 74.4

Edmonson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,550 5,017 533 375 254 6.8 5.1 107 5 831 72 19,426 52.5Elliott . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,137 2,449 688 258 220 8.2 9.0 52 –7 310 –83 18,003 48.7Estill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,133 5,997 136 405 290 6.6 4.8 202 –20 1,713 –353 18,900 51.1Fayette . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149,338 148,870 468 6,474 4,474 4.3 3.0 8,006 116 144,215 –6,968 33,535 90.7Fleming . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,713 6,460 253 437 305 6.5 4.7 269 –20 2,535 –432 22,748 61.5

Floyd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,302 13,767 1,535 992 965 6.5 7.0 827 –2 9,525 112 27,748 75.1Franklin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25,660 25,353 307 1,198 866 4.7 3.4 1,203 33 17,432 512 27,064 73.2Fulton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,910 3,134 –224 218 167 7.5 5.3 171 –20 2,419 –434 20,489 55.4Gallatin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,053 3,902 151 193 157 4.8 4.0 104 9 1,151 –278 22,845 61.8Garrard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,597 7,533 64 446 266 5.9 3.5 210 –20 1,583 –344 22,059 59.7

Grant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,723 11,534 1,189 679 449 5.3 3.9 426 –21 4,566 –259 22,798 61.7Graves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,930 17,066 –1,136 1,140 847 7.2 5.0 730 62 9,234 –1,163 24,848 67.2Grayson. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,706 11,204 502 973 581 8.3 5.2 466 –1 7,818 209 20,853 56.4Green . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,624 5,318 306 317 243 5.6 4.6 187 15 1,280 –180 19,808 53.6Greenup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,425 15,762 1,663 1,020 928 5.9 5.9 532 20 5,673 779 28,650 77.5





County





2004

2006 2000

Netchange,

2000–2006 2006 2000 2006 2000 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004

Amount(dol.)

Percentof

U.S.average

KENTUCKY—Con.

Hancock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,257 4,176 81 252 214 5.9 5.1 148 19 3,600 533 42,788 115.7Hardin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47,903 42,744 5,159 2,601 1,888 5.4 4.4 2,126 169 33,168 469 27,221 73.6Harlan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,232 10,004 228 824 835 8.1 8.3 518 –9 5,850 135 28,112 76.0Harrison. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,059 9,101 –42 494 325 5.5 3.6 312 9 3,930 –211 30,502 82.5Hart. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,909 7,601 308 506 361 6.4 4.7 250 –2 3,382 798 22,141 59.9

Henderson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23,325 22,758 567 1,198 807 5.1 3.5 1,071 –14 18,580 –1,420 30,426 82.3Henry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,113 7,746 367 460 250 5.7 3.2 215 –34 2,025 –659 24,902 67.4Hickman. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,071 2,355 –284 140 110 6.8 4.7 85 –11 763 –442 23,232 62.8Hopkins . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23,528 21,167 2,361 1,353 1,145 5.8 5.4 1,046 –22 15,017 41 29,134 78.8Jackson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,808 5,025 –217 468 289 9.7 5.8 150 7 2,422 162 21,881 59.2

Jefferson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 360,170 361,025 –855 20,338 13,470 5.6 3.7 20,008 176 400,096 –16,294 35,953 97.3Jessamine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22,374 20,591 1,783 1,060 622 4.7 3.0 986 97 13,849 1,387 25,878 70.0Johnson. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,665 9,057 608 631 528 6.5 5.8 481 5 4,381 –485 22,004 59.5Kenton. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84,917 82,730 2,187 4,187 2,717 4.9 3.3 3,235 6 63,383 –448 35,519 96.1Knott . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,580 5,687 893 459 422 7.0 7.4 215 –12 2,803 161 31,970 86.5

Knox . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,251 11,069 1,182 842 639 6.9 5.8 399 –39 4,187 –1,467 23,097 62.5Larue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,110 6,376 734 395 287 5.6 4.5 220 –1 2,174 245 18,763 50.8Laurel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26,007 24,054 1,953 1,515 1,022 5.8 4.2 1,095 57 19,123 1,851 27,574 74.6Lawrence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,834 5,476 358 486 384 8.3 7.0 216 7 2,182 –199 27,000 73.0Lee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,783 2,480 303 205 146 7.4 5.9 112 5 1,817 102 17,877 48.4

Leslie . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,712 3,918 –206 328 234 8.8 6.0 127 –5 1,050 –166 22,846 61.8Letcher . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,173 8,770 403 695 694 7.6 7.9 387 –32 5,092 –121 30,870 83.5Lewis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,569 5,588 –19 459 484 8.2 8.7 150 13 1,197 216 20,896 56.5Lincoln. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,849 10,780 69 778 444 7.2 4.1 300 – 2,988 38 23,277 63.0Livingston. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,873 4,908 –35 300 278 6.2 5.7 152 8 1,526 –333 29,746 80.5

Logan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,531 13,206 –675 727 487 5.8 3.7 509 –16 7,232 –996 30,630 82.9Lyon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,325 3,140 185 221 177 6.6 5.6 169 –2 1,197 –278 17,566 47.5McCracken . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31,200 31,495 –295 1,699 1,458 5.4 4.6 2,154 37 34,891 –2,056 28,440 76.9McCreary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,060 6,048 12 613 409 10.1 6.8 173 –1 1,761 –219 18,057 48.8McLean . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,787 4,753 34 357 249 7.5 5.2 171 –8 1,376 –86 24,088 65.2

Madison. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42,815 37,273 5,542 2,046 1,352 4.8 3.6 1,508 71 22,724 314 25,452 68.9Magoffin. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,356 4,437 –81 449 474 10.3 10.7 191 –3 2,009 40 19,481 52.7Marion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,103 8,556 1,547 533 434 5.3 5.1 366 37 6,558 1,046 25,367 68.6Marshall . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,873 14,690 183 903 751 6.1 5.1 655 4 8,454 –382 34,669 93.8Martin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,630 3,439 191 273 255 7.5 7.4 180 5 2,540 560 33,543 90.7

Mason . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,738 8,266 472 459 311 5.3 3.8 490 37 7,504 –918 28,597 77.4Meade . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,413 11,680 733 782 477 6.3 4.1 314 9 2,792 –230 25,414 68.7Menifee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,717 2,592 125 229 164 8.4 6.3 65 –7 484 –88 21,764 58.9Mercer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,603 10,649 –46 619 406 5.8 3.8 405 2 6,034 –183 31,581 85.4Metcalfe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,528 4,580 –52 246 208 5.4 4.5 118 –13 1,624 –948 24,982 67.6

Monroe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,093 5,377 –284 319 440 6.3 8.2 215 –6 2,508 –412 21,261 57.5Montgomery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,086 11,170 916 728 491 6.0 4.4 548 15 8,465 437 24,363 65.9Morgan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,043 4,861 182 443 319 8.8 6.6 179 –21 1,948 –315 25,201 68.2Muhlenberg . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,016 13,039 –23 1,201 766 9.2 5.9 578 –14 7,000 86 22,260 60.2Nelson. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21,043 19,563 1,480 1,241 827 5.9 4.2 932 54 12,349 –79 28,314 76.6

Nicholas. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,988 3,251 –263 206 230 6.9 7.1 82 –9 629 –106 16,970 45.9Ohio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,884 10,529 1,355 720 542 6.1 5.1 370 15 5,171 386 21,795 59.0Oldham . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26,990 23,962 3,028 1,339 719 5.0 3.0 1,136 141 9,781 488 26,564 71.9Owen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,220 4,975 245 291 182 5.6 3.7 114 –3 1,096 –45 24,606 66.6Owsley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,550 1,518 32 131 87 8.5 5.7 49 4 394 79 16,975 45.9

Pendleton. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,574 7,139 435 422 251 5.6 3.5 187 –17 1,589 –121 24,035 65.0Perry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,510 9,958 1,552 795 677 6.9 6.8 679 –32 9,770 214 30,119 81.5Pike . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25,183 24,824 359 1,507 1,541 6.0 6.2 1,419 –100 18,624 –1,601 30,118 81.5Powell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,593 5,788 –195 411 288 7.3 5.0 180 –7 1,899 –464 19,235 52.0Pulaski. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27,393 25,580 1,813 1,778 1,121 6.5 4.4 1,501 57 20,991 601 24,323 65.8

Robertson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,054 1,088 –34 56 48 5.3 4.4 21 –3 131 –13 14,840 40.1Rockcastle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,613 7,127 486 522 342 6.9 4.8 228 7 2,722 –119 20,616 55.8Rowan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,277 10,745 1,532 704 477 5.7 4.4 475 12 7,073 732 22,442 60.7Russell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,173 7,402 771 543 424 6.6 5.7 380 27 4,681 493 20,771 56.2Scott . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21,064 18,263 2,801 1,008 582 4.8 3.2 787 133 20,632 1,171 44,579 120.6

Shelby . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,618 18,260 2,358 1,080 555 5.2 3.0 825 102 12,806 1,029 30,226 81.8Simpson. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,004 8,437 567 518 292 5.8 3.5 371 3 7,575 –39 28,856 78.1Spencer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,478 6,501 1,977 517 196 6.1 3.0 208 37 925 –23 20,694 56.0Taylor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,235 11,144 2,091 642 580 4.9 5.2 664 –12 8,573 1,285 23,727 64.2Todd . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,131 5,728 –597 494 237 9.6 4.1 189 –9 2,167 –206 20,589 55.7

Trigg . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,627 5,926 701 390 267 5.9 4.5 245 –6 3,140 400 23,480 63.5Trimble . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,490 4,070 420 300 155 6.7 3.8 82 9 657 128 23,758 64.3Union . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,196 7,385 –189 432 353 6.0 4.8 292 –7 5,216 –1,044 28,678 77.6Warren . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56,832 50,031 6,801 2,717 1,892 4.8 3.8 2,650 150 45,460 1,813 28,895 78.2Washington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,374 5,200 174 314 214 5.8 4.1 242 31 2,838 163 25,506 69.0





County





2004

2006 2000

Netchange,

2000–2006 2006 2000 2006 2000 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004

Amount(dol.)

Percentof

U.S.average

KENTUCKY—Con.

Wayne . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,767 8,140 627 587 450 6.7 5.5 323 13 4,885 480 20,303 54.9Webster . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,742 6,748 –6 346 312 5.1 4.6 245 –11 2,884 67 31,962 86.5Whitley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,374 14,226 1,148 945 702 6.1 4.9 900 53 13,711 –367 24,275 65.7Wolfe. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,322 2,510 –188 224 214 9.6 8.5 84 10 703 1 17,757 48.0Woodford . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,596 13,358 238 573 376 4.2 2.8 530 20 7,311 –989 32,637 88.3

LOUISIANA . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,990,120 2,031,292 –41,172 79,772 100,630 4.0 5.0 3103,067 32,051 31,623,680 331,323 330,207 381.7

Acadia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25,712 23,867 1,845 815 1,296 3.2 5.4 1,031 17 10,921 –983 22,643 61.3Allen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,610 8,703 –93 399 549 4.6 6.3 346 –6 3,524 84 20,079 54.3Ascension . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46,359 38,356 8,003 1,651 1,895 3.6 4.9 1,651 133 25,983 648 33,651 91.0Assumption . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,109 9,978 131 490 600 4.8 6.0 260 12 2,271 –202 24,841 67.2Avoyelles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,061 15,681 380 705 937 4.4 6.0 712 –3 8,421 –38 18,529 50.1

Beauregard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,382 13,993 389 562 695 3.9 5.0 601 –7 6,787 232 27,666 74.8Bienville . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,297 5,921 376 280 372 4.4 6.3 265 –2 3,228 38 24,309 65.8Bossier . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51,853 47,034 4,819 1,707 2,102 3.3 4.5 2,136 168 33,400 2,655 24,196 65.5Caddo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118,361 114,768 3,593 4,729 5,533 4.0 4.8 6,230 –28 108,211 70 30,086 81.4Calcasieu . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89,090 86,362 2,728 3,067 4,096 3.4 4.7 4,271 31 71,243 2,025 30,311 82.0

Caldwell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,374 4,340 34 167 276 3.8 6.4 192 –10 1,852 194 19,590 53.0Cameron . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,426 4,532 –106 133 212 3.0 4.7 173 –3 1,855 –21 33,294 90.1Catahoula . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,175 4,127 48 208 364 5.0 8.8 187 –12 1,662 –63 17,568 47.5Claiborne . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,858 6,474 384 291 388 4.2 6.0 248 –28 2,886 118 23,990 64.9Concordia. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,239 7,737 –498 425 613 5.9 7.9 345 3 3,650 503 22,138 59.9

De Soto . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,439 10,775 664 495 624 4.3 5.8 361 15 5,046 728 33,298 90.1East Baton Rouge . . . . . . . . . . 214,878 206,885 7,993 8,063 8,931 3.8 4.3 11,487 –12 214,405 979 31,209 84.4East Carroll . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,982 3,093 –111 239 281 8.0 9.1 136 –3 1,043 36 21,663 58.6East Feliciana . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,319 8,261 58 339 443 4.1 5.4 248 –4 4,894 1,433 25,109 67.9Evangeline . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,116 12,116 – 492 675 4.1 5.6 542 –18 6,336 330 23,372 63.2

Franklin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,761 8,185 –424 446 562 5.7 6.9 422 1 4,348 3 17,910 48.4Grant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,671 7,890 781 317 465 3.7 5.9 209 7 1,717 263 21,012 56.8Iberia. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34,099 30,433 3,666 1,132 1,650 3.3 5.4 1,651 47 26,666 1,745 32,078 86.8Iberville . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,650 12,585 65 673 831 5.3 6.6 535 –7 10,950 313 43,530 117.8Jackson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,437 6,696 –259 246 357 3.8 5.3 281 –12 2,853 –343 24,283 65.7

Jefferson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 181,505 231,695 –50,190 9,151 9,956 5.0 4.3 12,693 –149 203,114 –13,668 30,755 83.2Jefferson Davis . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,392 12,766 1,626 421 700 2.9 5.5 587 –2 6,346 479 21,096 57.1Lafayette . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107,747 97,296 10,451 2,918 3,720 2.7 3.8 7,098 437 106,532 4,016 31,089 84.1Lafourche. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46,909 41,048 5,861 1,310 1,721 2.8 4.2 1,860 24 27,244 2,979 30,966 83.8La Salle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,069 5,885 184 190 321 3.1 5.5 299 –18 2,410 –531 22,585 61.1

Lincoln. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18,580 19,049 –469 778 962 4.2 5.1 950 59 13,671 919 24,552 66.4Livingston. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54,262 44,722 9,540 1,886 2,360 3.5 5.3 1,417 189 13,829 1,595 21,615 58.5Madison. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,649 4,954 –305 256 373 5.5 7.5 202 –8 2,092 –83 18,555 50.2Morehouse . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,475 12,433 –958 690 891 6.0 7.2 521 –1 6,206 –44 26,169 70.8Natchitoches. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,758 16,569 1,189 720 912 4.1 5.5 810 31 12,333 2,200 19,763 53.5

Orleans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154,041 210,684 –56,643 7,224 10,744 4.7 5.1 10,500 –119 211,247 2,722 32,972 89.2Ouachita . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71,950 69,776 2,174 2,674 3,092 3.7 4.4 4,271 167 64,215 –1,594 27,026 73.1Plaquemines. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,246 11,006 –1,760 440 599 4.8 5.4 750 17 10,591 –994 42,165 114.1Pointe Coupee . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,852 9,732 120 418 575 4.2 5.9 363 13 3,970 194 22,927 62.0Rapides . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60,037 55,629 4,408 2,123 2,818 3.5 5.1 3,141 56 48,112 –174 27,409 74.1

Red River. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,271 3,540 –269 181 230 5.5 6.5 139 –8 2,239 560 22,795 61.7Richland. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,560 8,653 –93 399 558 4.7 6.4 415 12 4,678 –333 22,466 60.8Sabine. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,641 9,286 355 329 454 3.4 4.9 470 – 4,704 163 22,131 59.9St. Bernard. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23,991 32,177 –8,186 746 1,642 3.1 5.1 1,183 –8 13,820 –109 28,019 75.8St. Charles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,583 23,892 –4,309 1,012 1,246 5.2 5.2 922 40 19,146 1,437 45,510 123.1

St. Helena . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,213 4,052 161 292 219 6.9 5.4 102 12 1,339 593 20,286 54.9St. James. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,340 8,819 –479 495 710 5.9 8.1 316 3 5,401 –306 42,191 114.1St. John the Baptist . . . . . . . . . 16,959 19,988 –3,029 1,250 1,271 7.4 6.4 667 41 10,531 –702 33,634 91.0St. Landry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37,475 32,670 4,805 1,468 1,987 3.9 6.1 1,577 48 20,835 4,218 26,427 71.5St. Martin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23,421 21,316 2,105 768 1,107 3.3 5.2 766 110 7,787 –659 22,591 61.1

St. Mary. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23,057 22,433 624 951 1,550 4.1 6.9 1,367 –63 21,498 –891 32,852 88.9St. Tammany. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86,662 96,404 –9,742 3,925 3,899 4.5 4.0 5,265 630 61,226 9,444 27,447 74.2Tangipahoa. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50,389 45,087 5,302 2,233 2,726 4.4 6.0 2,097 83 30,567 5,559 22,210 60.1Tensas. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,301 2,473 –172 164 176 7.1 7.1 109 1 757 –32 25,808 69.8Terrebonne . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52,509 45,769 6,740 1,561 1,986 3.0 4.3 2,840 142 41,871 2,609 30,920 83.6

Union . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,394 10,173 221 403 541 3.9 5.3 327 –9 5,203 56 16,150 43.7Vermilion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23,880 23,278 602 811 1,157 3.4 5.0 988 51 9,514 122 26,834 72.6Vernon. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21,625 18,267 3,358 780 1,050 3.6 5.7 625 –2 8,714 1,321 22,048 59.6Washington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,428 16,756 –1,328 802 974 5.2 5.8 695 –21 8,713 398 22,175 60.0Webster . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,661 18,420 1,241 766 1,053 3.9 5.7 803 –46 10,901 –26 25,247 68.3

West Baton Rouge. . . . . . . . . . 10,537 10,152 385 390 502 3.7 4.9 455 25 8,284 –571 32,288 87.3West Carroll . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,202 4,832 370 304 434 5.8 9.0 180 –21 1,786 –86 21,205 57.4West Feliciana . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,953 4,798 155 221 302 4.5 6.3 186 14 2,908 214 45,933 124.3Winn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,341 6,025 316 253 370 4.0 6.1 327 –8 4,370 347 26,209 70.9





County





2004

2006 2000

Netchange,

2000–2006 2006 2000 2006 2000 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004

Amount(dol.)

Percentof

U.S.average

MAINE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 711,376 672,440 38,936 32,533 22,055 4.6 3.3 341,269 31,803 3494,256 32,476 331,237 384.5

Androscoggin . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58,435 55,241 3,194 2,712 1,839 4.6 3.3 2,824 38 45,262 –604 29,607 80.1Aroostook. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36,069 34,627 1,442 2,339 1,426 6.5 4.1 2,181 –134 24,513 –525 25,095 67.9Cumberland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158,644 148,699 9,945 5,378 3,601 3.4 2.4 11,000 692 155,617 5,520 35,495 96.0Franklin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,628 14,365 263 831 708 5.7 4.9 867 22 10,162 –375 26,543 71.8Hancock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30,320 28,627 1,693 1,596 1,131 5.3 4.0 2,175 35 17,064 –33 32,442 87.8

Kennebec. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63,960 60,826 3,134 2,833 2,085 4.4 3.4 3,350 130 42,941 –296 29,237 79.1Knox . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21,700 20,851 849 920 565 4.2 2.7 1,651 123 14,601 485 28,781 77.9Lincoln. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18,617 17,762 855 795 524 4.3 3.0 1,493 128 8,667 154 28,535 77.2Oxford . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28,583 27,587 996 1,627 1,102 5.7 4.0 1,427 23 14,297 –1,637 26,900 72.8Penobscot . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79,068 74,854 4,214 3,904 2,702 4.9 3.6 4,215 42 56,018 –824 29,114 78.8

Piscataquis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,698 7,894 –196 510 406 6.6 5.1 481 3 4,542 –639 25,383 68.7Sagadahoc . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18,900 18,795 105 761 490 4.0 2.6 890 106 13,875 –40 34,667 93.8Somerset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25,437 25,038 399 1,716 1,169 6.7 4.7 1,181 –35 14,809 –1,733 29,833 80.7Waldo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,527 18,979 548 1,024 728 5.2 3.8 978 126 9,443 144 30,182 81.6Washington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,550 15,668 –118 1,153 914 7.4 5.8 924 8 7,771 –257 25,741 69.6York . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114,242 102,622 11,620 4,436 2,662 3.9 2.6 5,573 437 54,010 2,472 30,438 82.3

MARYLAND. . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,009,143 2,811,657 197,486 116,523 100,275 3.9 3.6 3136,062 37,595 32,151,474 393,170 339,204 3106.1

Allegany. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35,819 32,993 2,826 2,036 1,958 5.7 5.9 1,793 –54 27,104 1,968 27,473 74.3Anne Arundel . . . . . . . . . . . . . 283,120 268,268 14,852 9,468 8,118 3.3 3.0 13,592 1,417 207,420 22,603 38,375 103.8Baltimore . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 431,861 409,441 22,420 17,114 15,191 4.0 3.7 20,291 1,301 325,423 11,024 37,300 100.9Calvert. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47,336 40,479 6,857 1,499 1,220 3.2 3.0 1,759 269 17,637 2,715 31,897 86.3Caroline . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,309 15,404 905 708 557 4.3 3.6 681 89 6,872 334 27,590 74.6

Carroll . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94,855 84,170 10,685 3,027 2,505 3.2 3.0 4,427 355 48,406 4,881 28,382 76.8Cecil . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50,960 45,904 5,056 2,222 1,621 4.4 3.5 1,759 115 22,619 1,790 35,468 95.9Charles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74,792 65,300 9,492 2,372 1,930 3.2 3.0 2,800 392 35,173 5,740 27,712 75.0Dorchester . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,242 15,635 1,607 976 803 5.7 5.1 788 75 10,191 540 27,035 73.1Frederick . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124,318 109,912 14,406 3,913 2,983 3.1 2.7 5,761 823 83,388 11,044 34,097 92.2

Garrett . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,718 14,560 2,158 830 759 5.0 5.2 973 86 10,148 929 23,201 62.8Harford . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133,094 120,208 12,886 4,849 3,910 3.6 3.3 5,275 442 64,262 5,425 29,824 80.7Howard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158,974 145,008 13,966 4,570 3,648 2.9 2.5 7,939 597 146,154 11,164 47,123 127.5Kent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,880 10,095 785 438 392 4.0 3.9 705 36 7,837 816 25,014 67.7Montgomery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 519,688 489,050 30,638 14,937 12,853 2.9 2.6 26,446 815 412,188 8,038 47,573 128.7

Prince George’s. . . . . . . . . . . . 454,601 430,406 24,195 18,813 15,874 4.1 3.7 14,522 694 258,949 8,255 37,375 101.1Queen Anne’s . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25,844 22,763 3,081 876 698 3.4 3.1 1,384 187 10,816 1,241 27,257 73.7St. Mary’s. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50,459 44,467 5,992 1,711 1,445 3.4 3.2 1,797 108 26,807 4,659 35,581 96.3Somerset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,702 10,480 1,222 637 655 5.4 6.3 376 –29 3,704 534 30,424 82.3

Talbot . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,128 17,565 1,563 693 588 3.6 3.3 1,587 134 16,944 47 29,972 81.1Washington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70,138 66,332 3,806 3,094 2,428 4.4 3.7 3,444 116 58,748 144 30,717 83.1Wicomico . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53,135 46,358 6,777 2,150 1,932 4.0 4.2 2,658 124 39,427 2,121 29,625 80.1Worcester. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28,294 26,077 2,217 1,738 1,609 6.1 6.2 2,238 115 19,227 821 26,286 71.1

Independent City

Baltimore city . . . . . . . . . . . . . 279,877 280,786 –909 17,853 16,599 6.4 5.9 12,919 –721 281,689 –16,689 43,132 116.7

MASSACHUSETTS. . . . . . . . 3,404,394 3,365,573 38,821 169,534 92,292 5.0 2.7 3175,933 3–289 32,979,690 3–107,354 345,389 3122.8

Barnstable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121,635 113,365 8,270 6,356 3,856 5.2 3.4 8,635 296 76,600 4,413 33,417 90.4Berkshire . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72,947 70,051 2,896 3,332 2,048 4.6 2.9 4,439 56 57,291 –1,644 31,646 85.6Bristol . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 289,692 278,203 11,489 18,096 10,432 6.2 3.7 13,400 180 203,088 –59 32,116 86.9Dukes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,900 10,068 832 447 280 4.1 2.8 1,001 –5 5,147 131 41,421 112.0Essex . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 378,010 372,511 5,499 20,018 10,408 5.3 2.8 18,517 –71 275,148 –7,218 38,785 104.9

Franklin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39,561 39,202 359 1,794 969 4.5 2.5 1,797 –2 22,223 –2,535 30,576 82.7Hampden . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 224,928 219,254 5,674 13,775 7,305 6.1 3.3 10,355 –1,245 172,229 –8,978 33,988 91.9Hampshire . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88,038 86,556 1,482 3,684 1,900 4.2 2.2 3,621 33 48,458 2,453 27,873 75.4Middlesex. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 814,972 821,779 –6,807 33,593 18,240 4.1 2.2 42,823 –251 787,300 –65,654 51,274 138.7Nantucket. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,264 7,285 979 204 109 2.5 1.5 840 65 3,827 6 50,523 136.7

Norfolk. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 358,885 357,112 1,773 15,482 8,375 4.3 2.3 19,364 –314 328,104 –9,462 43,873 118.7Plymouth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 261,140 251,284 9,856 13,248 6,859 5.1 2.7 12,193 554 153,150 5,391 35,464 95.9Suffolk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 334,652 351,064 –16,412 18,046 10,764 5.4 3.1 19,739 –850 548,381 –22,736 61,772 167.1Worcester. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 400,768 387,841 12,927 21,458 10,747 5.4 2.8 19,026 1,112 292,652 –726 37,226 100.7

MICHIGAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,081,336 5,143,916 –62,580 351,045 190,495 6.9 3.7 3237,984 31,072 33,895,914 3–176,872 337,917 3102.6

Alcona . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,468 4,465 3 468 298 10.5 6.7 247 1 1,194 –248 24,131 65.3Alger . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,517 4,374 143 352 232 7.8 5.3 264 –86 2,230 –625 26,140 70.7Allegan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57,102 57,730 –628 3,441 1,648 6.0 2.9 2,356 189 35,349 –816 32,823 88.8Alpena. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,166 15,536 –370 1,147 849 7.6 5.5 922 6 11,944 798 28,363 76.7Antrim . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,207 11,603 604 934 525 7.7 4.5 652 –9 4,440 –1,121 27,460 74.3

Arenac. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,956 7,648 308 786 437 9.9 5.7 381 –98 3,587 –2,224 22,877 61.9Baraga . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,312 4,119 193 473 265 11.0 6.4 212 –16 1,852 –404 25,379 68.7Barry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31,325 30,386 939 1,624 1,011 5.2 3.3 1,036 28 11,422 –307 28,222 76.3Bay . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55,844 56,597 –753 3,880 2,286 6.9 4.0 2,515 –41 33,008 –2,328 31,526 85.3Benzie . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,336 8,391 945 707 374 7.6 4.5 512 43 3,833 630 24,020 65.0





County





2004

2006 2000

Netchange,

2000–2006 2006 2000 2006 2000 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004

Amount(dol.)

Percentof

U.S.average

MICHIGAN—Con.

Berrien. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79,547 84,375 –4,828 5,545 3,087 7.0 3.7 4,021 30 59,271 –1,228 32,298 87.4Branch. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22,846 23,411 –565 1,688 888 7.4 3.8 918 –18 13,120 –230 28,767 77.8Calhoun . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72,237 69,600 2,637 4,935 2,905 6.8 4.2 2,922 –107 54,363 –6,356 35,002 94.7Cass . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27,965 27,130 835 1,486 853 5.3 3.1 855 35 8,810 –302 27,921 75.5Charlevoix . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,475 13,819 656 1,105 612 7.6 4.4 934 –153 9,200 –1,851 29,695 80.3

Cheboygan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,467 12,943 524 1,273 1,040 9.5 8.0 843 –71 5,736 –592 27,992 75.7Chippewa. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,908 17,467 441 1,510 1,108 8.4 6.3 877 –24 8,824 –405 23,282 63.0Clare . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,646 13,028 618 1,392 696 10.2 5.3 579 –65 6,211 –38 23,466 63.5Clinton. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37,903 35,658 2,245 1,988 930 5.2 2.6 1,230 61 13,176 –509 29,988 81.1Crawford . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,947 6,703 244 521 305 7.5 4.6 344 42 3,596 503 28,328 76.6

Delta . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,829 19,809 1,020 1,480 1,034 7.1 5.2 1,174 –33 13,571 64 27,762 75.1Dickinson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,745 14,000 745 838 569 5.7 4.1 971 –11 12,633 –1,218 31,058 84.0Eaton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59,539 57,957 1,582 3,118 1,631 5.2 2.8 1,931 –56 27,887 –3,386 27,342 74.0Emmet. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,556 18,057 2,499 1,706 980 8.3 5.4 1,649 256 14,944 723 31,358 84.8Genesee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 212,853 213,893 –1,040 17,361 9,547 8.2 4.5 8,998 –119 143,474 –8,265 34,460 93.2

Gladwin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,029 10,963 66 1,075 571 9.7 5.2 484 20 4,111 –246 25,454 68.9Gogebic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,855 7,719 136 585 475 7.4 6.2 482 –18 4,936 175 19,563 52.9Grand Traverse . . . . . . . . . . . . 49,534 45,570 3,964 2,944 1,542 5.9 3.4 3,648 80 43,406 –97 30,937 83.7Gratiot . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,666 19,552 1,114 1,751 883 8.5 4.5 821 –48 12,183 –479 26,728 72.3Hillsdale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22,509 24,180 –1,671 1,743 885 7.7 3.7 931 –10 13,861 –1,986 27,920 75.5

Houghton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18,100 17,121 979 1,228 827 6.8 4.8 945 17 9,766 –245 22,316 60.4Huron . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,797 17,600 197 1,410 788 7.9 4.5 1,001 –43 9,913 –1,399 27,655 74.8Ingham . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154,682 154,649 33 9,678 4,579 6.3 3.0 7,228 99 129,849 1,998 34,167 92.4Ionia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31,635 29,957 1,678 2,584 1,099 8.2 3.7 1,003 –33 11,455 –501 26,394 71.4Iosco . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,368 11,603 –235 1,020 736 9.0 6.3 761 79 6,817 1,388 26,088 70.6

Iron . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,075 5,654 421 430 319 7.1 5.6 421 9 2,948 –163 23,163 62.7Isabella . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38,536 34,825 3,711 1,963 1,163 5.1 3.3 1,538 214 21,657 2,323 24,685 66.8Jackson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78,785 79,110 –325 5,625 2,690 7.1 3.4 3,386 –25 50,674 –4,022 32,824 88.8Kalamazoo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134,568 132,817 1,751 6,943 3,960 5.2 3.0 5,801 –103 112,858 2,012 36,203 97.9Kalkaska . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,001 8,551 450 690 395 7.7 4.6 379 –16 3,417 –604 31,141 84.2

Kent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 325,350 318,485 6,865 18,326 9,890 5.6 3.1 16,193 920 321,088 –14,901 35,520 96.1Keweenaw . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,085 1,049 36 108 64 10.0 6.1 62 –5 210 –232 17,157 46.4Lake . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,256 4,456 –200 444 249 10.4 5.6 171 –4 1,311 101 22,458 60.8Lapeer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44,967 45,922 –955 3,529 1,991 7.8 4.3 1,813 –8 19,040 –2,677 27,412 74.2Leelanau . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,837 11,325 512 588 342 5.0 3.0 698 9 4,171 –275 25,218 68.2

Lenawee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50,586 51,729 –1,143 3,689 1,927 7.3 3.7 2,143 12 30,122 –263 28,626 77.4Livingston. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94,228 89,658 4,570 5,014 2,362 5.3 2.6 4,192 393 45,889 1,362 32,679 88.4Luce . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,899 2,754 145 218 165 7.5 6.0 189 –7 1,825 242 22,582 61.1Mackinac . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,677 6,881 –204 636 513 9.5 7.5 507 –30 2,360 –487 31,808 86.0Macomb. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 421,446 433,849 –12,403 30,194 15,738 7.2 3.6 19,231 391 308,750 –26,500 39,052 105.6

Manistee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,369 11,830 539 1,036 622 8.4 5.3 666 54 5,529 –347 28,170 76.2Marquette. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36,301 34,183 2,118 2,176 1,479 6.0 4.3 1,735 99 22,601 1,971 28,217 76.3Mason . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,177 14,731 446 1,194 703 7.9 4.8 826 –27 8,932 –576 28,016 75.8Mecosta. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,636 18,923 1,713 1,518 804 7.4 4.2 842 –62 10,005 558 23,484 63.5Menominee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,319 13,272 47 838 544 6.3 4.1 483 –39 5,832 –1,170 26,825 72.6

Midland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42,807 42,593 214 2,381 1,380 5.6 3.2 1,850 –97 32,767 –3,777 46,089 124.7Missaukee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,888 7,000 –112 521 309 7.6 4.4 269 –72 2,071 –98 23,324 63.1Monroe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79,051 77,060 1,991 5,115 2,445 6.5 3.2 2,613 127 39,254 –301 32,510 87.9Montcalm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28,810 29,401 –591 3,643 1,213 12.6 4.1 1,146 35 15,428 –160 29,061 78.6Montmorency . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,410 4,083 327 519 323 11.8 7.9 264 16 1,842 138 22,336 60.4

Muskegon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91,030 85,500 5,530 6,237 3,489 6.9 4.1 3,672 85 54,342 –3,122 31,384 84.9Newaygo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23,657 23,002 655 1,692 1,058 7.2 4.6 840 66 9,801 875 29,691 80.3Oakland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 630,690 675,784 –45,094 36,329 19,446 5.8 2.9 41,828 –71 746,068 –45,022 47,270 127.9Oceana . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,816 13,217 1,599 1,241 771 8.4 5.8 578 –12 5,004 480 23,516 63.6Ogemaw . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,990 9,600 390 808 511 8.1 5.3 618 4 6,431 875 22,696 61.4

Ontonagon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,598 3,648 –50 281 228 7.8 6.3 227 –7 1,820 151 25,319 68.5Osceola . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,303 11,176 –873 754 502 7.3 4.5 472 54 6,152 –795 33,789 91.4Oscoda . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,128 3,894 234 431 234 10.4 6.0 212 –44 1,578 –302 22,697 61.4Otsego . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,810 12,354 456 1,042 508 8.1 4.1 916 7 10,611 110 26,035 70.4Ottawa. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138,851 135,248 3,603 7,287 3,618 5.2 2.7 6,080 190 104,319 –3,486 34,222 92.6

Presque Isle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,364 6,497 –133 751 531 11.8 8.2 392 –49 2,331 –1,051 24,035 65.0Roscommon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,179 10,371 808 1,012 554 9.1 5.3 689 –43 4,967 –145 23,377 63.2Saginaw. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99,133 101,113 –1,980 7,396 4,069 7.5 4.0 4,899 –124 85,375 –7,238 31,724 85.8St. Clair . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84,186 87,056 –2,870 6,767 3,688 8.0 4.2 3,543 12 44,947 –3,536 30,715 83.1St. Joseph . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31,657 32,584 –927 2,063 1,090 6.5 3.3 1,288 –1 19,937 –780 33,188 89.8

Sanilac . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23,009 21,933 1,076 1,936 1,001 8.4 4.6 976 –15 9,653 –1,475 25,160 68.1Schoolcraft . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,159 3,925 234 432 315 10.4 8.0 275 –6 2,137 165 26,351 71.3Shiawassee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37,233 37,396 –163 2,989 1,445 8.0 3.9 1,323 8 15,671 –775 25,555 69.1Tuscola . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29,553 28,771 782 2,491 1,307 8.4 4.5 1,013 –56 10,508 –1,643 26,452 71.6





County





2004

2006 2000

Netchange,

2000–2006 2006 2000 2006 2000 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004

Amount(dol.)

Percentof

U.S.average

MICHIGAN—Con.

Van Buren . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41,374 39,619 1,755 2,771 1,590 6.7 4.0 1,454 –93 16,348 –689 27,728 75.0Washtenaw. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 191,462 185,356 6,106 8,795 4,395 4.6 2.4 8,383 131 153,330 –4,134 42,637 115.3Wayne . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 894,058 952,531 –58,473 75,214 41,237 8.4 4.3 35,137 –874 705,771 –51,716 42,669 115.4Wexford . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,167 15,596 –429 1,215 829 8.0 5.3 898 34 13,728 –326 27,451 74.3

MINNESOTA . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,939,304 2,807,668 131,636 117,007 87,176 4.0 3.1 3148,626 39,546 32,393,126 3–2,235 338,609 3104.4

Aitkin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,915 7,174 741 465 426 5.9 5.9 433 24 3,277 85 23,814 64.4Anoka . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 193,461 179,025 14,436 7,467 4,840 3.9 2.7 7,522 901 106,938 5,698 40,917 110.7Becker . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,202 15,608 1,594 863 757 5.0 4.9 929 –123 12,778 –3,657 25,012 67.7Beltrami . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21,672 20,310 1,362 1,105 934 5.1 4.6 1,150 126 14,031 1,331 25,160 68.1Benton. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22,738 20,568 2,170 1,003 708 4.4 3.4 942 191 14,153 2,756 30,323 82.0

Big Stone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,895 2,772 123 123 113 4.2 4.1 205 4 1,542 7 18,623 50.4Blue Earth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36,759 33,870 2,889 1,192 939 3.2 2.8 1,932 250 32,246 4,699 26,688 72.2Brown . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,184 15,400 –216 665 565 4.4 3.7 791 90 13,023 512 25,344 68.6Carlton. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,259 15,864 1,395 906 763 5.2 4.8 783 100 9,751 690 28,618 77.4Carver . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48,969 41,009 7,960 1,616 986 3.3 2.4 2,164 414 30,657 3,110 38,587 104.4

Cass . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,899 13,378 1,521 922 714 6.2 5.3 922 149 6,855 1,554 23,501 63.6Chippewa. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,389 7,110 279 278 346 3.8 4.9 435 27 4,771 688 23,690 64.1Chisago . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27,595 23,206 4,389 1,330 842 4.8 3.6 1,224 125 12,497 1,828 28,879 78.1Clay . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31,831 28,040 3,791 1,022 902 3.2 3.2 1,192 45 15,034 324 21,456 58.0Clearwater . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,877 4,193 –316 374 387 9.6 9.2 210 13 1,905 68 29,073 78.6

Cook . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,301 3,130 171 142 124 4.3 4.0 264 5 2,029 –95 23,560 63.7Cottonwood . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,436 6,258 178 290 290 4.5 4.6 344 –41 3,944 –93 22,954 62.1Crow Wing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33,074 29,052 4,022 1,594 1,155 4.8 4.0 2,101 181 24,405 2,787 27,363 74.0Dakota. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 232,232 216,846 15,386 8,132 5,259 3.5 2.4 9,711 1,108 158,404 4,287 37,696 102.0Dodge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,411 10,217 1,194 414 303 3.6 3.0 473 60 4,165 121 31,377 84.9

Douglas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,425 18,183 2,242 774 587 3.8 3.2 1,399 110 15,214 1,151 28,436 76.9Faribault. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,982 8,594 –612 356 310 4.5 3.6 505 42 4,867 –11 24,248 65.6Fillmore . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,444 11,728 –284 470 357 4.1 3.0 661 12 5,210 –669 23,066 62.4Freeborn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,715 17,404 –689 732 593 4.4 3.4 891 –122 11,326 –1,973 26,542 71.8Goodhue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25,217 25,109 108 1,069 756 4.2 3.0 1,407 130 19,027 –577 29,288 79.2

Grant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,168 3,288 –120 161 157 5.1 4.8 236 36 1,616 206 21,812 59.0Hennepin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 664,469 665,632 –1,163 23,450 17,914 3.5 2.7 40,289 1,152 810,943 –54,425 48,377 130.9Houston . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,330 10,937 393 485 438 4.3 4.0 464 74 4,633 603 20,913 56.6Hubbard. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,809 9,139 670 534 441 5.4 4.8 545 –3 4,647 –394 25,155 68.0Isanti . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21,474 17,912 3,562 1,049 606 4.9 3.4 832 82 8,754 1,429 27,093 73.3

Itasca . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22,814 21,641 1,173 1,351 1,225 5.9 5.7 1,199 –25 12,929 –976 28,432 76.9Jackson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,812 6,140 672 260 184 3.8 3.0 300 –45 3,977 –96 25,400 68.7Kanabec . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,913 7,913 – 546 373 6.9 4.7 313 24 3,246 –298 26,136 70.7Kandiyohi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23,673 22,905 768 919 728 3.9 3.2 1,383 84 18,652 –1,782 27,478 74.3Kittson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,655 2,575 80 144 138 5.4 5.4 158 –2 1,092 (NA) 20,889 56.5

Koochiching . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,823 7,243 –420 447 371 6.6 5.1 441 –14 4,908 28 27,951 75.6Lac qui Parle . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,186 4,119 67 157 135 3.8 3.3 224 –54 1,836 –503 24,058 65.1Lake . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,298 5,915 383 255 243 4.0 4.1 305 22 3,434 391 26,846 72.6Lake of the Woods. . . . . . . . . . 2,402 2,346 56 113 93 4.7 4.0 151 –6 1,284 –18 19,093 51.6Le Sueur . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,366 14,925 –559 768 564 5.3 3.8 646 –96 6,188 –2,948 27,362 74.0

Lincoln. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,435 3,461 –26 123 121 3.6 3.5 188 15 1,363 (NA) 18,786 50.8Lyon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,910 14,650 260 485 417 3.3 2.8 841 75 11,683 –1,559 28,616 77.4McLeod . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21,253 20,257 996 827 655 3.9 3.2 1,000 102 16,516 –77 33,212 89.8Mahnomen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,563 2,472 91 141 140 5.5 5.7 112 –22 1,879 (NA) 20,878 56.5Marshall . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,481 5,193 288 366 403 6.7 7.8 296 –60 1,713 –631 26,946 72.9

Martin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,220 11,703 –483 482 397 4.3 3.4 683 1 8,216 –262 26,830 72.6Meeker . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,758 12,310 448 634 518 5.0 4.2 604 – 5,972 100 26,964 72.9Mille Lacs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,228 11,853 375 821 520 6.7 4.4 755 129 10,452 983 26,452 71.6Morrison. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,398 16,676 722 963 761 5.5 4.6 868 31 8,515 –511 23,882 64.6Mower . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,622 19,941 681 781 557 3.8 2.8 998 86 15,869 2,549 31,689 85.7

Murray. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,724 5,184 540 217 190 3.8 3.7 317 25 2,259 24 22,680 61.4Nicollet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,529 18,114 1,415 611 490 3.1 2.7 618 –52 12,328 –1,198 27,091 73.3Nobles. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,399 11,090 309 356 327 3.1 2.9 647 8 8,641 204 23,067 62.4Norman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,673 3,719 –46 183 162 5.0 4.4 212 1 1,533 151 22,550 61.0Olmsted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80,095 72,625 7,470 2,707 1,921 3.4 2.6 3,362 370 80,397 5,099 38,252 103.5

Otter Tail . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30,108 29,296 812 1,433 1,182 4.8 4.0 1,663 94 17,851 –145 24,832 67.2Pennington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,545 7,669 876 465 450 5.4 5.9 430 101 7,398 1,538 27,900 75.5Pine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,087 13,421 666 893 694 6.3 5.2 621 –22 6,552 1,648 22,384 60.5Pipestone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,163 5,406 –243 173 178 3.4 3.3 331 32 3,545 –368 21,383 57.8Polk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,291 15,815 1,476 800 754 4.6 4.8 818 –13 9,333 591 23,919 64.7

Pope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,454 5,861 593 243 169 3.8 2.9 361 54 4,027 817 30,216 81.7Ramsey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 276,503 286,223 –9,720 10,592 8,191 3.8 2.9 14,063 362 301,748 –3,396 42,282 114.4Red Lake . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,256 2,204 52 153 160 6.8 7.3 109 2 843 –429 22,420 60.6Redwood . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,263 8,891 –628 334 273 4.0 3.1 564 –66 4,902 –1,041 25,900 70.1Renville . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,539 9,155 –616 409 354 4.8 3.9 558 –85 5,783 –336 24,257 65.6





County





2004

2006 2000

Netchange,

2000–2006 2006 2000 2006 2000 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004

Amount(dol.)

Percentof

U.S.average

MINNESOTA—Con.

Rice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32,481 31,556 925 1,381 969 4.3 3.1 1,503 87 22,894 1,538 26,787 72.5Rock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,071 5,236 –165 141 136 2.8 2.6 270 15 2,611 –425 22,186 60.0Roseau . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,445 9,290 1,155 650 335 6.2 3.6 427 30 8,100 410 28,693 77.6St. Louis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103,349 103,276 73 5,179 4,444 5.0 4.3 5,639 100 80,028 852 29,520 79.9Scott . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71,171 54,255 16,916 2,495 1,408 3.5 2.6 2,902 690 35,217 4,162 36,031 97.5

Sherburne . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47,459 37,835 9,624 2,067 1,136 4.4 3.0 1,763 451 16,920 2,547 29,969 81.1Sibley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,982 8,779 203 373 279 4.2 3.2 383 19 2,946 –168 23,996 64.9Stearns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82,670 78,237 4,433 3,291 2,417 4.0 3.1 4,327 386 72,623 696 29,557 80.0Steele . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,196 19,474 722 799 556 4.0 2.9 1,047 85 19,272 –1,237 32,894 89.0Stevens . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,863 5,693 170 195 191 3.3 3.4 349 9 3,794 82 25,525 69.0

Swift . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,463 5,667 –204 245 212 4.5 3.7 316 –4 2,807 –747 23,031 62.3Todd . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,653 12,364 289 648 471 5.1 3.8 520 –15 4,868 72 23,286 63.0Traverse . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,976 1,811 165 82 83 4.1 4.6 131 – 855 (NA) 20,235 54.7Wabasha . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,878 12,298 580 509 355 4.0 2.9 634 –10 6,477 –834 26,054 70.5Wadena . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,381 6,676 –295 435 335 6.8 5.0 452 139 5,943 1,201 22,120 59.8

Waseca . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,603 10,593 10 434 313 4.1 3.0 509 44 6,465 –543 24,661 66.7Washington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128,147 117,904 10,243 4,538 2,900 3.5 2.5 5,202 700 64,934 6,925 35,602 96.3Watonwan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,736 6,042 –306 251 194 4.4 3.2 338 12 3,981 318 24,100 65.2Wilkin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,642 3,691 –49 136 111 3.7 3.0 177 –7 1,744 233 25,068 67.8Winona . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28,794 28,898 –104 1,028 880 3.6 3.0 1,310 3 20,786 –1,953 27,869 75.4Wright . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64,039 52,505 11,534 2,763 1,664 4.3 3.2 2,917 551 28,764 3,097 29,626 80.1Yellow Medicine. . . . . . . . . . . . 5,737 5,721 16 230 235 4.0 4.1 350 2 3,961 –185 27,823 75.3

MISSISSIPPI . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,307,347 1,314,154 –6,807 88,683 74,295 6.8 5.7 360,534 3746 3928,313 3–28,468 326,734 372.3

Adams. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,204 14,526 –1,322 927 955 7.0 6.6 930 –75 9,851 –1,771 23,583 63.8Alcorn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,859 16,683 –824 1,167 851 7.4 5.1 842 –22 12,090 –1,782 25,643 69.4Amite. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,337 5,547 –210 329 309 6.2 5.6 166 – 1,429 –182 27,726 75.0Attala . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,528 8,352 –824 600 618 8.0 7.4 386 –15 6,510 498 21,388 57.9Benton. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,961 3,203 –242 274 217 9.3 6.8 71 8 900 88 25,842 69.9

Bolivar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,817 16,267 –450 1,347 1,219 8.5 7.5 769 –2 9,317 –1,064 20,913 56.6Calhoun . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,323 6,937 –614 497 413 7.9 6.0 286 –28 2,834 –448 22,525 60.9Carroll . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,852 5,033 –181 297 301 6.1 6.0 92 –27 441 –371 16,231 43.9Chickasaw . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,790 8,790 –1,000 698 492 9.0 5.6 394 –19 6,257 –1,149 22,046 59.6Choctaw. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,507 4,038 –531 272 315 7.8 7.8 126 –9 1,339 –68 24,861 67.3

Claiborne . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,701 4,289 –588 401 406 10.8 9.5 136 –16 2,067 –331 41,998 113.6Clarke . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,166 7,632 –466 451 652 6.3 8.5 272 –40 2,307 –1,437 21,251 57.5Clay . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,274 9,770 –1,496 917 629 11.1 6.4 398 –21 7,336 –649 26,334 71.2Coahoma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,694 11,788 –1,094 1,051 945 9.8 8.0 614 –52 8,032 –747 24,962 67.5Copiah. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,439 12,254 185 870 796 7.0 6.5 440 –18 6,040 33 22,699 61.4

Covington. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,728 8,407 321 508 485 5.8 5.8 323 20 4,499 367 21,210 57.4DeSoto . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71,799 58,900 12,899 2,989 1,478 4.2 2.5 2,127 286 34,590 3,548 26,139 70.7Forrest. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36,968 35,111 1,857 1,943 1,774 5.3 5.1 2,144 11 34,383 713 26,971 73.0Franklin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,222 3,447 –225 220 235 6.8 6.8 125 –29 1,202 –196 24,653 66.7George . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,442 8,405 37 832 665 9.9 7.9 309 5 3,745 798 22,504 60.9

Greene . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,037 4,799 238 385 427 7.6 8.9 130 7 876 8 20,162 54.5Grenada . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,931 10,549 –618 644 610 6.5 5.8 630 9 9,702 –980 26,068 70.5Hancock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,063 19,516 –453 1,941 951 10.2 4.9 810 57 9,978 – 28,785 77.9Harrison. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84,569 90,854 –6,285 9,071 4,384 10.7 4.8 4,537 78 77,751 –2,134 26,359 71.3Hinds. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121,971 122,444 –473 7,015 6,441 5.8 5.3 6,482 –219 117,728 –17,787 31,064 84.0

Holmes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,275 7,625 –350 774 1,043 10.6 13.7 283 15 2,204 –448 20,249 54.8Humphreys. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,285 4,253 32 401 413 9.4 9.7 163 –18 1,781 –995 20,318 55.0Issaquena . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 742 849 –107 74 90 10.0 10.6 9 –6 33 –65 27,212 73.6Itawamba . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,556 11,131 –575 669 611 6.3 5.5 355 33 4,381 –51 27,189 73.5Jackson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59,502 63,505 –4,003 4,837 3,804 8.1 6.0 2,301 –76 40,579 –2,060 31,075 84.1

Jasper . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,700 7,444 256 460 454 6.0 6.1 236 –23 3,163 –617 24,540 66.4Jefferson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,751 3,178 –427 359 397 13.0 12.5 62 –16 513 –165 24,244 65.6Jefferson Davis . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,232 5,447 –215 404 558 7.7 10.2 177 –6 1,425 –196 20,944 56.7Jones . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31,541 29,930 1,611 1,502 1,384 4.8 4.6 1,449 –17 25,534 2,762 26,777 72.4Kemper . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,226 4,408 –182 354 381 8.4 8.6 129 14 1,142 167 17,956 48.6

Lafayette . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22,548 19,749 2,799 1,048 900 4.6 4.6 975 82 11,144 –170 24,684 66.8Lamar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23,130 20,023 3,107 978 833 4.2 4.2 831 111 9,143 1,436 21,269 57.5Lauderdale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33,624 34,567 –943 2,162 2,045 6.4 5.9 2,090 –10 31,589 406 25,933 70.2Lawrence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,190 5,932 –742 394 475 7.6 8.0 213 –8 2,210 –142 33,831 91.5Leake . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,407 8,908 –501 573 585 6.8 6.6 314 –27 5,014 –1,013 19,661 53.2

Lee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38,559 39,841 –1,282 2,313 1,834 6.0 4.6 2,386 139 43,148 –6,248 31,008 83.9Leflore . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,982 14,629 –647 1,233 1,346 8.8 9.2 811 –49 12,825 –222 24,008 64.9Lincoln. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,527 14,719 –192 880 832 6.1 5.7 779 –18 10,999 245 24,153 65.3Lowndes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26,288 27,660 –1,372 1,783 1,606 6.8 5.8 1,614 –18 23,049 –1,668 27,400 74.1Madison. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44,140 39,319 4,821 2,075 1,703 4.7 4.3 2,307 350 41,082 13,551 30,451 82.4

Marion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,376 10,643 –267 679 664 6.5 6.2 582 –10 6,593 –120 21,731 58.8Marshall . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,284 15,256 28 1,188 663 7.8 4.3 440 5 6,708 –464 20,730 56.1Monroe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,804 17,712 –908 1,503 1,301 8.9 7.3 717 –3 10,177 –21 27,927 75.5Montgomery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,687 5,337 –650 427 350 9.1 6.6 254 7 2,559 –711 21,851 59.1Neshoba . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,641 13,355 1,286 731 742 5.0 5.6 562 11 10,178 1,724 31,539 85.3





County





2004

2006 2000

Netchange,

2000–2006 2006 2000 2006 2000 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004

Amount(dol.)

Percentof

U.S.average

MISSISSIPPI—Con.

Newton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,612 9,847 –235 564 571 5.9 5.8 398 24 4,736 20 21,917 59.3Noxubee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,303 4,729 –426 488 436 11.3 9.2 225 –1 2,854 411 18,911 51.2Oktibbeha . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,277 20,734 –457 1,154 1,105 5.7 5.3 825 12 11,125 459 19,308 52.2Panola. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,171 14,738 433 1,181 1,070 7.8 7.3 641 –4 8,886 –324 23,934 64.7Pearl River . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,328 21,258 –930 1,336 1,119 6.6 5.3 802 42 7,781 –10 19,773 53.5

Perry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,290 5,193 97 353 333 6.7 6.4 166 15 1,555 –397 32,476 87.9Pike . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,727 16,088 –361 1,039 1,062 6.6 6.6 992 2 13,671 –242 21,665 58.6Pontotoc . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,413 13,665 –252 800 648 6.0 4.7 495 22 11,545 1,896 24,316 65.8Prentiss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,344 12,279 –935 821 654 7.2 5.3 520 –14 7,479 –465 22,200 60.1Quitman. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,956 4,033 –77 339 304 8.6 7.5 128 –16 1,104 –32 23,048 62.3

Rankin. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71,876 63,330 8,546 2,974 2,364 4.1 3.7 2,973 463 46,465 6,639 29,042 78.6Scott . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,495 12,737 758 736 624 5.5 4.9 524 18 9,272 –211 23,768 64.3Sharkey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,501 2,644 –143 248 270 9.9 10.2 142 16 912 115 20,372 55.1Simpson. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,989 11,857 132 668 597 5.6 5.0 455 34 6,127 1,360 18,137 49.1Smith. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,866 7,335 –469 383 363 5.6 4.9 171 –29 2,395 –785 26,286 71.1

Stone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,308 6,575 –267 550 381 8.7 5.8 277 –15 3,116 749 24,451 66.1Sunflower . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,464 12,136 –672 1,066 1,123 9.3 9.3 451 –54 5,970 –1,432 22,029 59.6Tallahatchie . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,238 6,041 197 483 512 7.7 8.5 197 12 1,834 371 22,228 60.1Tate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,960 11,708 252 797 443 6.7 3.8 391 –23 4,516 –1,060 22,573 61.1Tippah . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,597 9,810 –213 659 576 6.9 5.9 387 –10 7,531 407 22,471 60.8

Tishomingo. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,214 8,943 –729 608 654 7.4 7.3 401 –13 4,928 –326 23,974 64.9Tunica . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,424 4,036 388 362 211 8.2 5.2 225 26 14,534 –4,033 25,125 68.0Union . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,816 12,522 –706 710 578 6.0 4.6 501 38 7,621 –2,488 24,213 65.5Walthall . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,825 6,324 –499 392 448 6.7 7.1 231 3 2,405 –241 18,638 50.4Warren . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22,733 24,355 –1,622 1,352 1,279 5.9 5.3 1,154 –35 20,202 –1,668 28,197 76.3

Washington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22,459 26,061 –3,602 2,199 2,087 9.8 8.0 1,400 –108 18,515 –2,498 23,088 62.5Wayne . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,495 8,826 –331 541 589 6.4 6.7 395 4 5,074 93 25,255 68.3Webster . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,498 4,694 –1,196 288 241 8.2 5.1 185 –12 1,648 –1,118 21,322 57.7Wilkinson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,541 3,530 11 291 312 8.2 8.8 166 –4 1,661 –22 22,357 60.5Winston . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,963 8,689 –726 559 614 7.0 7.1 379 –18 5,278 –121 25,113 67.9Yalobusha . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,432 5,745 –313 415 349 7.6 6.1 218 –27 2,616 –128 28,152 76.2Yazoo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,060 10,735 –675 884 798 8.8 7.4 424 –15 4,353 –1,209 23,157 62.6

MISSOURI . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,032,434 2,973,092 59,342 146,577 97,756 4.8 3.3 3153,985 39,230 32,421,450 322,471 332,690 388.4

Adair . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,363 13,296 67 584 393 4.4 3.0 722 95 8,326 –453 22,687 61.4Andrew . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,080 8,948 1,132 406 260 4.0 2.9 262 20 1,622 –661 19,872 53.8Atchison. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,090 3,377 –287 125 84 4.0 2.5 245 38 1,596 104 19,125 51.7Audrain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,807 12,780 –973 540 385 4.6 3.0 607 –35 7,204 –1,201 25,027 67.7Barry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,244 16,770 474 718 550 4.2 3.3 873 59 14,185 305 28,560 77.3

Barton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,956 6,575 –619 317 174 5.3 2.6 294 7 4,797 285 21,595 58.4Bates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,060 8,257 –197 449 290 5.6 3.5 424 34 3,095 42 19,356 52.4Benton. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,281 7,499 782 467 382 5.6 5.1 430 11 2,824 404 17,109 46.3Bollinger. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,990 6,028 –38 320 249 5.3 4.1 222 11 1,370 –3 18,764 50.8Boone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87,450 79,950 7,500 2,827 1,743 3.2 2.2 4,112 309 63,209 702 28,620 77.4

Buchanan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46,744 42,954 3,790 2,122 1,444 4.5 3.4 2,537 202 38,833 1,752 29,178 78.9Butler . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21,213 19,151 2,062 1,162 889 5.5 4.6 1,352 309 16,431 1,359 23,143 62.6Caldwell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,475 4,516 –41 232 144 5.2 3.2 176 –8 975 –29 23,273 63.0Callaway . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22,696 22,077 619 979 605 4.3 2.7 707 28 10,472 –285 29,093 78.7Camden. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21,579 19,139 2,440 1,034 766 4.8 4.0 1,501 –98 12,869 –739 24,071 65.1

Cape Girardeau. . . . . . . . . . . . 39,085 38,876 209 1,586 1,148 4.1 3.0 2,423 102 37,274 680 26,977 73.0Carroll . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,163 5,083 80 244 160 4.7 3.1 242 –3 1,881 –122 20,781 56.2Carter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,895 2,535 360 174 139 6.0 5.5 170 32 1,094 329 18,629 50.4Cass . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49,588 45,465 4,123 2,247 1,204 4.5 2.6 1,959 178 18,246 2,763 23,445 63.4Cedar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,185 5,925 260 326 210 5.3 3.5 419 105 2,615 –72 21,296 57.6

Chariton. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,950 4,353 –403 206 155 5.2 3.6 227 25 1,135 –559 21,592 58.4Christian . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38,518 31,026 7,492 1,426 837 3.7 2.7 1,429 224 11,819 653 21,596 58.4Clark . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,582 3,862 –280 182 134 5.1 3.5 142 –4 915 –35 20,268 54.8Clay . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113,465 108,441 5,024 4,848 2,538 4.3 2.3 4,906 217 86,517 1,924 35,618 96.4Clinton. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,507 10,093 414 506 288 4.8 2.9 462 40 4,127 694 20,901 56.5

Cole . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40,362 40,216 146 1,517 1,008 3.8 2.5 2,362 174 36,671 –578 29,516 79.8Cooper . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,940 8,175 765 388 258 4.3 3.2 468 43 4,904 1,053 18,935 51.2Crawford . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,827 11,140 687 691 477 5.8 4.3 596 103 4,813 –339 24,119 65.2Dade . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,817 3,791 26 182 128 4.8 3.4 163 12 1,387 157 21,803 59.0Dallas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,694 7,259 435 385 308 5.0 4.2 264 –9 2,519 –267 15,145 41.0

Daviess . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,013 3,959 54 181 122 4.5 3.1 183 –1 997 –126 22,062 59.7DeKalb . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,236 5,002 234 279 169 5.3 3.4 209 17 1,141 –351 21,973 59.4Dent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,455 6,838 –383 390 320 6.0 4.7 390 49 3,402 –444 25,059 67.8Douglas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,853 6,112 –259 322 269 5.5 4.4 206 11 2,025 –20 17,711 47.9Dunklin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,067 14,701 –634 1,031 648 7.3 4.4 837 80 8,060 –67 19,653 53.2





County





2004

2006 2000

Netchange,

2000–2006 2006 2000 2006 2000 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004

Amount(dol.)

Percentof

U.S.average

MISSOURI—Con.

Franklin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53,155 51,752 1,403 2,773 1,765 5.2 3.4 2,716 297 33,054 1,233 27,419 74.2Gasconade. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,984 7,891 93 441 259 5.5 3.3 497 62 4,396 –302 22,946 62.1Gentry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,292 3,341 –49 140 100 4.3 3.0 188 –17 1,613 –174 21,128 57.2Greene . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141,445 133,853 7,592 5,213 3,630 3.7 2.7 8,029 376 143,947 6,818 27,202 73.6Grundy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,687 5,214 –527 223 162 4.8 3.1 258 –4 2,485 –1,492 21,645 58.6

Harrison. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,464 4,517 –53 213 134 4.8 3.0 237 –9 2,084 –99 18,855 51.0Henry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,548 11,059 –511 557 385 5.3 3.5 686 49 6,936 –431 26,522 71.7Hickory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,342 3,347 –5 236 192 7.1 5.7 177 23 745 51 17,188 46.5Holt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,650 2,744 –94 109 81 4.1 3.0 132 – 801 –124 24,079 65.1Howard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,525 5,437 88 237 159 4.3 2.9 205 –4 1,749 –72 19,482 52.7

Howell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,346 18,072 1,274 838 668 4.3 3.7 1,098 80 12,966 –473 22,215 60.1Iron . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,844 4,794 50 274 260 5.7 5.4 677 430 2,315 119 21,416 57.9Jackson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 341,598 351,797 –10,199 19,248 11,930 5.6 3.4 18,292 290 354,979 –21,207 36,603 99.0Jasper . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56,019 54,745 1,274 2,366 1,721 4.2 3.1 3,300 221 51,771 –3,502 28,431 76.9Jefferson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117,240 111,902 5,338 5,651 3,403 4.8 3.0 3,898 405 37,762 2,083 25,514 69.0

Johnson. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25,941 24,327 1,614 1,064 775 4.1 3.2 924 82 9,461 –489 25,876 70.0Knox . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,289 2,136 153 92 72 4.0 3.4 127 13 742 85 19,449 52.6Laclede . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,000 16,507 493 822 600 4.8 3.6 873 37 11,690 –405 24,046 65.0Lafayette . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,972 17,748 –776 798 546 4.7 3.1 843 45 7,225 138 20,369 55.1Lawrence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18,882 17,956 926 746 561 4.0 3.1 703 60 7,080 401 24,686 66.8

Lewis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,791 5,740 51 217 178 3.7 3.1 222 –11 2,110 83 18,646 50.4Lincoln. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24,944 20,966 3,978 1,322 660 5.3 3.1 880 120 8,769 1,847 27,938 75.6Linn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,430 6,987 –557 431 347 6.7 5.0 427 90 4,472 –63 23,463 63.5Livingston. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,852 7,311 –459 303 196 4.4 2.7 435 –18 5,009 –193 23,105 62.5McDonald. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,419 10,957 1,462 467 368 3.8 3.4 348 9 5,168 323 22,154 59.9

Macon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,045 8,321 –276 395 339 4.9 4.1 414 38 3,513 –411 21,067 57.0Madison. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,856 5,440 416 322 257 5.5 4.7 270 1 2,699 235 18,675 50.5Maries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,773 4,602 171 219 164 4.6 3.6 163 28 1,288 224 21,152 57.2Marion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,075 14,585 –510 700 552 5.0 3.8 939 132 12,371 215 23,814 64.4Mercer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,799 1,931 –132 79 53 4.4 2.7 83 4 381 –52 22,837 61.8

Miller . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,160 12,457 703 688 530 5.2 4.3 796 224 6,765 936 23,150 62.6Mississippi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,758 6,019 –261 385 309 6.7 5.1 295 8 2,560 –180 19,829 53.6Moniteau . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,593 7,548 45 349 224 4.6 3.0 362 25 3,117 –5 20,897 56.5Monroe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,275 4,764 –489 234 175 5.5 3.7 228 10 2,177 –1 21,453 58.0Montgomery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,170 6,246 –76 339 206 5.5 3.3 316 –25 2,416 –434 22,016 59.6

Morgan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,251 9,300 –49 625 371 6.8 4.0 525 12 3,534 104 17,684 47.8New Madrid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,481 9,192 –711 567 438 6.7 4.8 349 –4 4,136 –2,224 30,508 82.5Newton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28,489 27,930 559 1,267 1,015 4.4 3.6 1,090 88 16,565 492 26,635 72.1Nodaway . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,244 12,030 214 427 278 3.5 2.3 528 22 7,499 527 23,589 63.8Oregon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,253 4,338 –85 213 166 5.0 3.8 226 15 1,686 –9 17,576 47.5

Osage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,552 7,462 90 340 273 4.5 3.7 295 35 2,886 203 23,828 64.5Ozark . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,353 4,329 24 209 179 4.8 4.1 164 –15 986 –20 16,490 44.6Pemiscot . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,925 8,210 –285 546 450 6.9 5.5 404 59 4,654 129 20,306 54.9Perry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,222 10,012 210 365 255 3.6 2.5 498 15 8,186 –242 26,924 72.8Pettis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,994 20,551 –557 1,033 682 5.2 3.3 1,086 41 17,578 –88 25,637 69.4

Phelps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21,849 19,717 2,132 971 666 4.4 3.4 1,193 107 14,668 2,397 23,001 62.2Pike . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,707 8,600 107 464 300 5.3 3.5 424 17 4,507 697 23,319 63.1Platte . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48,157 45,591 2,566 1,878 989 3.9 2.2 2,142 282 38,275 2,509 32,978 89.2Polk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,411 13,261 1,150 626 391 4.3 2.9 665 72 7,517 –155 19,607 53.0Pulaski. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,947 14,880 3,067 898 735 5.0 4.9 781 117 7,363 1,684 20,729 56.1

Putnam . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,493 2,447 46 126 77 5.1 3.1 107 9 626 –31 18,911 51.2Ralls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,399 5,542 –143 269 195 5.0 3.5 177 10 1,779 –700 30,754 83.2Randolph . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,838 12,010 828 642 449 5.0 3.7 674 95 8,930 1,364 24,078 65.1Ray. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,021 12,230 –209 608 422 5.1 3.5 395 –11 3,607 –114 20,602 55.7Reynolds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,476 2,713 –237 173 191 7.0 7.0 172 13 1,571 –24 22,877 61.9

Ripley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,430 5,647 783 379 279 5.9 4.9 271 26 2,693 735 15,686 42.4St. Charles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 188,991 168,690 20,301 7,327 4,017 3.9 2.4 7,313 1,059 117,026 21,492 31,770 85.9St. Clair . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,256 4,351 –95 246 164 5.8 3.8 224 39 1,612 249 17,511 47.4Ste. Genevieve . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,613 9,407 206 452 295 4.7 3.1 402 24 4,913 –371 27,974 75.7St. Francois . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27,597 25,352 2,245 1,654 1,383 6.0 5.5 1,419 136 19,749 3,172 21,464 58.1

St. Louis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 542,763 563,110 –20,347 25,194 15,961 4.6 2.8 29,951 –210 570,526 –16,322 38,848 105.1Saline . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,608 12,512 –904 548 356 4.7 2.8 579 23 7,048 –600 24,256 65.6Schuyler. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,261 2,153 108 119 93 5.3 4.3 114 23 413 27 18,063 48.9Scotland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,412 2,567 –155 104 72 4.3 2.8 163 28 790 –64 18,732 50.7Scott . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,079 20,361 –282 1,088 874 5.4 4.3 1,256 164 15,882 2,251 24,196 65.5

Shannon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,639 3,768 –129 241 200 6.6 5.3 167 28 1,088 –188 17,694 47.9Shelby . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,143 3,618 –475 165 163 5.2 4.5 200 17 1,262 –141 20,340 55.0Stoddard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,461 14,621 840 895 604 5.8 4.1 733 28 9,427 757 21,448 58.0Stone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,878 14,428 1,450 1,053 865 6.6 6.0 690 55 5,070 –223 21,580 58.4Sullivan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,280 3,661 –381 186 108 5.7 3.0 182 65 2,015 –243 23,979 64.9





County





2004

2006 2000

Netchange,

2000–2006 2006 2000 2006 2000 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004

Amount(dol.)

Percentof

U.S.average

MISSOURI—Con.

Taney . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25,424 23,145 2,279 1,743 1,491 6.9 6.4 1,716 –13 19,201 –867 24,569 66.5Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,396 10,519 –123 593 518 5.7 4.9 514 29 4,306 –516 21,394 57.9Vernon. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,845 10,258 –413 449 286 4.6 2.8 621 129 5,420 –424 23,407 63.3Warren . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,620 13,720 1,900 828 429 5.3 3.1 588 32 6,406 439 24,234 65.6Washington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,099 10,041 58 795 562 7.9 5.6 382 63 2,881 –45 19,216 52.0

Wayne . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,557 5,316 241 365 280 6.6 5.3 295 43 1,632 –434 17,934 48.5Webster . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,239 15,311 1,928 717 505 4.2 3.3 700 78 5,288 –54 23,474 63.5Worth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,126 1,179 –53 44 41 3.9 3.5 61 2 240 5 16,213 43.9Wright . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,001 8,205 –204 418 358 5.2 4.4 430 52 3,734 –36 19,782 53.5

Independent City

St. Louis city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158,275 163,640 –5,365 10,847 8,501 6.9 5.2 10,407 769 274,157 10,579 40,372 109.2

MONTANA . . . . . . . . . . . . . 493,842 468,865 24,977 15,680 22,313 3.2 4.8 334,686 32,837 3314,865 318,645 326,288 371.1

Beaverhead . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,946 5,028 –82 140 205 2.8 4.1 373 8 2,277 151 19,973 54.0Big Horn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,059 5,446 –387 314 513 6.2 9.4 223 15 2,047 17 28,736 77.7Blaine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,819 2,978 –159 89 162 3.2 5.4 149 –17 927 –53 26,283 71.1Broadwater . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,261 2,236 25 68 99 3.0 4.4 107 –3 657 –137 23,099 62.5Carbon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,380 4,994 386 150 220 2.8 4.4 395 89 2,058 102 18,950 51.3

Carter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 657 775 –118 21 27 3.2 3.5 32 5 138 12 17,399 47.1Cascade . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38,976 38,331 645 1,222 1,889 3.1 4.9 2,541 –23 28,868 1,110 24,528 66.3Chouteau . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,533 2,805 –272 66 102 2.6 3.6 168 14 816 66 17,266 46.7Custer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,551 5,988 –437 171 267 3.1 4.5 410 19 3,774 –131 23,519 63.6Daniels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 736 974 –238 23 43 3.1 4.4 77 –4 507 –18 25,531 69.1

Dawson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,119 4,767 –648 113 190 2.7 4.0 300 –14 2,872 395 19,223 52.0Deer Lodge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,844 4,246 –402 176 298 4.6 7.0 238 –1 2,179 –155 23,677 64.0Fallon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,731 1,547 184 32 56 1.8 3.6 123 5 795 127 26,127 70.7Fergus. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,662 6,117 –455 219 313 3.9 5.1 424 –24 3,226 167 22,293 60.3Flathead . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43,700 39,331 4,369 1,560 2,064 3.6 5.2 3,774 575 31,219 3,090 26,608 72.0

Gallatin5. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53,930 41,446 12,484 1,073 1,524 2.0 3.7 4,277 866 33,115 5,080 26,423 71.5Garfield . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 636 706 –70 21 29 3.3 4.1 29 4 158 34 14,620 39.5Glacier. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,801 5,720 81 369 465 6.4 8.1 276 –6 2,037 –24 29,782 80.6Golden Valley . . . . . . . . . . . . . 512 547 –35 18 29 3.5 5.3 17 4 61 –2 16,164 43.7Granite . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,255 1,355 –100 52 83 4.1 6.1 82 –6 421 –84 20,290 54.9

Hill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,880 8,008 –128 280 391 3.6 4.9 516 13 4,650 –99 21,041 56.9Jefferson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,665 5,377 288 190 254 3.4 4.7 230 36 1,651 270 27,385 74.1Judith Basin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,047 1,182 –135 33 53 3.2 4.5 58 7 183 26 16,415 44.4Lake . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,310 12,321 –1,011 511 671 4.5 5.4 762 76 5,240 –668 23,215 62.8Lewis and Clark. . . . . . . . . . . . 31,169 31,221 –52 928 1,257 3.0 4.0 2,060 99 22,041 1,059 26,657 72.1

Liberty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 809 962 –153 25 39 3.1 4.1 71 –5 420 –114 21,240 57.5Lincoln. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,585 7,885 –300 484 656 6.4 8.3 606 38 3,799 –82 22,051 59.6McCone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 996 1,103 –107 24 40 2.4 3.6 57 9 347 –9 23,510 63.6Madison. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,322 3,530 792 115 164 2.7 4.6 346 80 1,343 192 24,231 65.5Meagher . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 872 993 –121 37 57 4.2 5.7 69 1 281 –11 19,302 52.2

Mineral . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,971 1,888 83 89 121 4.5 6.4 140 17 947 112 19,328 52.3Missoula . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58,414 54,251 4,163 1,698 2,207 2.9 4.1 4,004 381 46,409 5,092 26,556 71.8Musselshell. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,039 2,095 –56 75 125 3.7 6.0 136 10 699 115 18,009 48.7Park5. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,310 9,045 265 279 460 3.0 5.1 765 26 4,462 18 22,362 60.5Petroleum. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 220 252 –32 9 17 4.1 6.7 12 4 23 8 11,043 29.9

Phillips. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,051 2,323 –272 73 102 3.6 4.4 151 – 807 5 19,473 52.7Pondera. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,692 2,981 –289 101 140 3.8 4.7 179 –16 1,250 –73 23,386 63.3Powder River . . . . . . . . . . . . . 889 1,002 –113 26 37 2.9 3.7 67 –1 242 52 14,562 39.4Powell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,630 2,887 –257 123 167 4.7 5.8 154 6 1,097 –46 20,611 55.8Prairie . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 552 616 –64 20 31 3.6 5.0 31 – 117 –58 23,453 63.4

Ravalli . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18,443 17,094 1,349 716 896 3.9 5.2 1,374 172 8,037 561 22,551 61.0Richland. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,023 4,978 45 126 261 2.5 5.2 411 17 3,260 174 25,448 68.8Roosevelt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,849 4,263 –414 216 299 5.6 7.0 213 –23 1,615 –200 19,985 54.1Rosebud . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,859 4,282 –423 197 252 5.1 5.9 188 –2 2,630 –41 34,818 94.2Sanders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,676 4,405 271 224 300 4.8 6.8 371 24 2,208 311 20,961 56.7

Sheridan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,704 2,017 –313 49 89 2.9 4.4 145 –2 889 10 17,756 48.0Silver Bow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,132 17,186 –54 596 983 3.5 5.7 1,088 –42 12,466 51 27,598 74.7Stillwater . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,394 4,423 –29 114 199 2.6 4.5 251 21 2,900 486 42,370 114.6Sweet Grass. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,801 1,989 812 43 61 1.5 3.1 163 29 701 57 21,174 57.3Teton. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,973 2,978 –5 87 128 2.9 4.3 195 –1 1,053 –24 23,592 63.8

Toole . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,462 2,528 –66 62 102 2.5 4.0 208 –1 1,588 37 23,743 64.2Treasure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 389 458 –69 12 21 3.1 4.6 25 1 92 – 17,457 47.2Valley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,540 3,848 –308 109 167 3.1 4.3 277 20 1,968 195 20,128 54.4Wheatland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 995 1,122 –127 28 52 2.8 4.6 60 2 323 12 16,146 43.7Wibaux . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 502 550 –48 13 23 2.6 4.2 28 4 149 –10 20,477 55.4Yellowstone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78,575 71,492 7,083 2,074 2,917 2.6 4.1 5,166 276 59,966 1,100 29,294 79.2Yellowstone National Park5 . . . . (X) (X) (NA) (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) (NA) (X) (NA) (NA) (NA)





County





2004

2006 2000

Netchange,

2000–2006 2006 2000 2006 2000 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004

Amount(dol.)

Percentof

U.S.average

NEBRASKA. . . . . . . . . . . . . 974,476 949,762 24,714 29,206 26,564 3.0 2.8 350,928 31,305 3774,311 323,235 330,584 382.7

Adams. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,666 17,332 –666 482 439 2.9 2.5 970 4 13,252 –969 25,832 69.9Antelope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,826 3,996 –170 106 107 2.8 2.7 231 –17 1,396 –120 20,777 56.2Arthur . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 265 273 –8 9 6 3.4 2.2 10 –6 22 –41 13,227 35.8Banner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 390 429 –39 9 12 2.3 2.8 4 –2 17 (NA) 24,706 66.8Blaine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 268 321 –53 8 11 3.0 3.4 8 –4 21 –20 10,905 29.5

Boone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,124 3,241 –117 81 77 2.6 2.4 194 –12 1,372 –134 21,278 57.6Box Butte . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,600 6,454 –854 168 251 3.0 3.9 354 –14 3,027 –348 21,604 58.4Boyd . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,170 1,261 –91 36 36 3.1 2.9 78 – 413 –18 16,029 43.4Brown . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,894 1,927 –33 54 61 2.9 3.2 142 –4 813 –69 17,843 48.3Buffalo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27,430 25,034 2,396 614 576 2.2 2.3 1,415 120 20,781 1,053 26,027 70.4

Burt. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,833 4,147 –314 154 149 4.0 3.6 210 –12 1,058 –248 20,528 55.5Butler . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,702 4,722 –20 128 129 2.7 2.7 198 14 1,932 152 23,040 62.3Cass . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,108 13,628 480 451 382 3.2 2.8 523 4 3,718 –281 24,015 65.0Cedar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,970 5,063 –93 111 120 2.2 2.4 308 27 1,625 –145 20,824 56.3Chase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,096 2,126 –30 48 48 2.3 2.3 145 3 1,049 61 23,404 63.3

Cherry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,655 3,539 116 81 89 2.2 2.5 211 –19 1,843 257 17,311 46.8Cheyenne . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,282 5,682 –400 124 129 2.3 2.3 318 9 4,678 369 33,290 90.1Clay . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,167 3,659 –492 95 105 3.0 2.9 190 –10 1,156 –123 23,529 63.6Colfax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,759 5,709 50 133 119 2.3 2.1 258 –9 3,842 91 23,906 64.7Cuming . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,257 5,703 –446 149 124 2.8 2.2 357 –1 3,002 –299 23,754 64.3

Custer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,140 6,219 –79 145 152 2.4 2.4 373 4 2,704 120 22,378 60.5Dakota. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,482 10,916 –434 299 353 2.9 3.2 428 –14 9,543 –1,343 29,653 80.2Dawes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,648 5,086 –438 130 152 2.8 3.0 296 4 2,362 219 16,915 45.8Dawson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,468 12,399 69 388 375 3.1 3.0 688 2 9,836 –214 24,236 65.6Deuel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,054 1,180 –126 29 34 2.8 2.9 71 –10 461 –69 20,631 55.8

Dixon. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,145 3,360 –215 79 87 2.5 2.6 128 2 1,579 875 27,987 75.7Dodge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,717 19,858 –141 670 607 3.4 3.1 1,042 –26 14,822 –467 25,028 67.7Douglas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 267,301 259,962 7,339 9,003 7,890 3.4 3.0 14,427 269 303,032 –2,728 36,306 98.2Dundy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,069 1,213 –144 33 25 3.1 2.1 66 –6 431 –22 21,153 57.2Fillmore . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,334 3,532 –198 89 89 2.7 2.5 221 –6 1,583 –291 23,510 63.6

Franklin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,841 1,822 19 56 47 3.0 2.6 90 –6 527 9 19,712 53.3Frontier . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,792 1,751 41 40 42 2.2 2.4 88 7 555 36 20,432 55.3Furnas. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,469 2,651 –182 74 71 3.0 2.7 185 1 1,215 –100 22,798 61.7Gage. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,803 12,679 124 466 375 3.6 3.0 675 –11 7,781 –407 22,911 62.0Garden . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,021 1,222 –201 30 31 2.9 2.5 57 –4 415 28 18,280 49.4

Garfield . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,051 1,020 31 27 24 2.6 2.4 92 3 512 –43 16,777 45.4Gosper . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,079 1,148 –69 30 30 2.8 2.6 56 5 202 8 18,980 51.3Grant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 411 441 –30 10 10 2.4 2.3 29 7 85 5 16,059 43.4Greeley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,345 1,410 –65 40 40 3.0 2.8 80 –3 408 –13 17,390 47.0Hall . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30,372 29,028 1,344 928 847 3.1 2.9 1,865 41 27,541 –225 26,452 71.6

Hamilton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,433 5,162 271 121 120 2.2 2.3 280 6 2,466 –129 26,348 71.3Harlan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,764 1,931 –167 44 48 2.5 2.5 97 –7 580 –4 17,438 47.2Hayes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 502 589 –87 15 20 3.0 3.4 17 –5 46 –33 27,435 74.2Hitchcock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,489 1,547 –58 51 40 3.4 2.6 63 – 370 63 21,043 56.9Holt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,165 6,289 –124 167 160 2.7 2.5 426 – 3,063 142 20,378 55.1

Hooker. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 463 452 11 14 14 3.0 3.1 32 – 162 –11 17,852 48.3Howard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,717 3,572 145 104 91 2.8 2.5 147 –8 856 40 19,791 53.5Jefferson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,366 4,390 –24 139 135 3.2 3.1 251 8 2,426 –166 23,351 63.2Johnson. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,289 2,516 773 97 153 2.9 6.1 124 –8 1,148 363 22,612 61.2Kearney . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,948 3,761 187 89 78 2.3 2.1 188 1 1,694 136 20,733 56.1

Keith . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,694 4,898 –204 124 131 2.6 2.7 358 –15 2,793 –182 21,980 59.5Keya Paha . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 430 501 –71 13 12 3.0 2.4 20 4 58 22 16,948 45.8Kimball . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,065 2,207 –142 55 52 2.7 2.4 157 –4 1,305 –114 21,027 56.9Knox . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,847 4,834 13 141 177 2.9 3.7 266 –9 1,526 103 16,951 45.9Lancaster . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 156,396 149,092 7,304 4,321 3,550 2.8 2.4 7,563 436 132,717 6,331 30,244 81.8

Lincoln. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21,138 18,480 2,658 584 583 2.8 3.2 1,016 32 11,609 1,468 21,201 57.4Logan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 450 420 30 10 10 2.2 2.4 20 4 66 11 18,576 50.2Loup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 357 337 20 13 8 3.6 2.4 8 –1 21 (NA) 11,667 31.6McPherson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 295 275 20 7 5 2.4 1.8 8 1 14 –1 8,357 22.6Madison. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,890 19,368 522 707 626 3.6 3.2 1,362 42 21,435 2,121 27,116 73.4

Merrick . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,349 4,307 42 149 114 3.4 2.6 242 10 1,589 –338 22,861 61.8Morrill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,802 2,812 –10 72 96 2.6 3.4 114 –8 799 20 20,740 56.1Nance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,038 2,072 –34 56 61 2.7 2.9 99 –8 448 –52 18,482 50.0Nemaha. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,607 3,792 –185 137 149 3.8 3.9 208 4 1,823 72 24,631 66.6Nuckolls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,358 2,589 –231 63 65 2.7 2.5 176 –8 1,222 –42 18,262 49.4

Otoe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,669 8,361 308 273 256 3.1 3.1 445 5 4,946 190 23,571 63.8Pawnee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,623 1,644 –21 49 56 3.0 3.4 74 –6 558 107 20,020 54.2Perkins . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,590 1,653 –63 36 36 2.3 2.2 112 11 794 59 22,569 61.1Phelps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,231 5,392 –161 115 116 2.2 2.2 346 23 3,780 –59 26,054 70.5Pierce . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,168 4,237 –69 115 109 2.8 2.6 213 –10 1,466 –165 20,405 55.2





County





2004

2006 2000

Netchange,

2000–2006 2006 2000 2006 2000 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004

Amount(dol.)

Percentof

U.S.average

NEBRASKA—Con.

Platte . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,502 17,558 –56 478 485 2.7 2.8 999 6 14,275 –1,434 26,652 72.1Polk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,023 3,051 –28 81 66 2.7 2.2 138 –9 1,043 105 21,994 59.5Red Willow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,992 6,215 –223 161 158 2.7 2.5 429 –10 3,971 –307 20,500 55.5Richardson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,351 4,746 –395 167 234 3.8 4.9 266 –26 1,949 –307 19,130 51.7Rock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 945 1,017 –72 23 27 2.4 2.7 61 1 270 –91 19,974 54.0

Saline . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,170 7,670 500 221 195 2.7 2.5 297 –16 6,094 545 27,438 74.2Sarpy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73,716 66,308 7,408 2,081 1,526 2.8 2.3 2,672 376 37,109 9,576 31,119 84.2Saunders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,219 11,125 94 330 316 2.9 2.8 464 8 3,235 –76 24,656 66.7Scotts Bluff . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,078 18,862 216 626 748 3.3 4.0 1,219 4 13,799 508 24,856 67.2Seward . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,297 9,241 56 244 219 2.6 2.4 443 21 5,351 –462 23,442 63.4

Sheridan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,191 3,306 –115 80 93 2.5 2.8 191 –6 1,216 42 16,609 44.9Sherman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,894 1,790 104 53 48 2.8 2.7 80 – 487 54 16,099 43.5Sioux. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 742 806 –64 21 15 2.8 1.9 14 –2 42 15 14,405 39.0Stanton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,677 3,551 126 109 91 3.0 2.6 99 15 481 –45 19,218 52.0Thayer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,848 3,173 –325 74 76 2.6 2.4 216 1 1,899 120 23,294 63.0

Thomas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 396 419 –23 12 21 3.0 5.0 32 –7 221 48 25,154 68.0Thurston . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,998 2,853 145 188 197 6.3 6.9 117 –11 1,261 –252 26,011 70.4Valley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,552 2,437 115 64 63 2.5 2.6 169 –2 1,315 161 19,474 52.7Washington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,281 10,938 343 309 267 2.7 2.4 530 50 6,240 362 31,136 84.2

Wayne . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,558 5,733 –175 134 147 2.4 2.6 249 5 2,913 –977 21,713 58.7Webster . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,993 1,970 23 51 51 2.6 2.6 99 2 708 114 18,403 49.8Wheeler . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 462 502 –40 11 12 2.4 2.4 19 – 148 62 9,818 26.6York . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,469 7,880 589 204 191 2.4 2.4 510 8 6,787 170 24,229 65.5

NEVADA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,295,085 1,062,845 232,240 54,217 47,624 4.2 4.5 355,853 37,675 31,022,011 3119,236 334,098 392.2

Churchill. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,930 11,985 945 556 748 4.3 6.2 495 11 5,585 106 27,820 75.3Clark . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 924,959 727,521 197,438 38,261 33,588 4.1 4.6 36,181 6,550 739,434 100,279 33,884 91.7Douglas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22,442 21,712 730 1,083 893 4.8 4.1 1,538 195 19,031 1,435 28,257 76.4Elko . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24,867 24,209 658 880 952 3.5 3.9 990 –23 16,354 –134 36,773 99.5Esmeralda . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 473 511 –38 20 44 4.2 8.6 15 5 109 4 36,046 97.5

Eureka. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 715 793 –78 28 26 3.9 3.3 29 –11 515 –1,876 56,192 152.0Humboldt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,110 7,794 316 306 383 3.8 4.9 356 –39 5,150 –472 34,640 93.7Lander . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,858 2,850 8 112 165 3.9 5.8 82 –8 834 –400 35,263 95.4Lincoln. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,618 1,655 –37 74 82 4.6 5.0 86 2 586 81 19,384 52.4Lyon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21,350 17,920 3,430 1,294 1,044 6.1 5.8 628 113 8,966 2,536 28,009 75.8

Mineral . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,066 2,354 –288 147 195 7.1 8.3 73 –15 1,260 16 29,836 80.7Nye. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,255 14,062 3,193 979 958 5.7 6.8 678 107 7,014 1,017 28,210 76.3Pershing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,440 2,553 –113 126 113 5.2 4.4 85 –8 1,253 –25 34,508 93.3Storey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,374 1,995 379 104 64 4.4 3.2 79 1 335 –129 18,525 50.1Washoe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 218,296 194,691 23,605 8,739 7,222 4.0 3.7 11,799 662 180,525 11,182 35,074 94.9White Pine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,491 3,769 722 171 158 3.8 4.2 199 –18 1,781 –14 29,771 80.5

Independent City

Carson City . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27,842 26,472 1,370 1,337 989 4.8 3.7 2,416 66 25,252 467 32,321 87.4

NEW HAMPSHIRE . . . . . . . . 736,780 694,254 42,526 25,268 18,713 3.4 2.7 338,843 31,429 3551,001 34,601 336,307 398.2

Belknap . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32,808 31,236 1,572 1,084 774 3.3 2.5 1,946 62 21,517 –660 31,298 84.7Carroll . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25,393 23,856 1,537 826 646 3.3 2.7 1,976 121 21,152 1,796 22,840 61.8Cheshire . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42,820 40,275 2,545 1,383 1,069 3.2 2.7 2,004 27 30,734 1,796 31,135 84.2Coos . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,766 17,299 –533 711 642 4.2 3.7 989 – 10,900 (NA) 26,145 70.7Grafton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47,796 45,266 2,530 1,375 1,081 2.9 2.4 3,046 148 47,015 –1,974 34,687 93.8

Hillsborough . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 228,202 214,534 13,668 8,092 5,546 3.5 2.6 11,090 186 173,710 –3,238 41,001 110.9Merrimack . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79,995 75,473 4,522 2,492 1,819 3.1 2.4 4,243 189 56,829 1,094 33,667 91.1Rockingham . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 172,950 162,039 10,911 6,527 4,889 3.8 3.0 9,780 435 129,151 3,809 38,892 105.2Strafford. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67,657 62,384 5,273 2,118 1,695 3.1 2.7 2,605 142 37,964 2,548 34,886 94.4Sullivan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22,396 21,892 504 661 550 3.0 2.5 1,081 37 11,549 –1,128 31,229 84.5

NEW JERSEY . . . . . . . . . . . 4,518,035 4,287,783 230,252 209,014 157,473 4.6 3.7 3240,539 36,980 33,609,640 361,211 344,392 3120.1

Atlantic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139,723 129,004 10,719 7,983 6,005 5.7 4.7 6,703 326 129,347 8,789 31,939 86.4Bergen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 477,018 469,215 7,803 18,445 14,768 3.9 3.1 33,486 311 470,179 1,004 47,729 129.1Burlington. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 245,661 221,419 24,242 10,013 6,868 4.1 3.1 10,733 415 181,100 7,210 37,960 102.7Camden. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 271,638 254,319 17,319 13,973 9,855 5.1 3.9 12,596 15 182,252 –1,631 36,880 99.8Cape May . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58,937 55,518 3,419 4,006 3,531 6.8 6.4 4,192 172 26,062 117 33,205 89.8

Cumberland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70,637 65,553 5,084 4,862 3,799 6.9 5.8 3,173 147 47,831 2,007 32,067 86.7Essex . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 370,603 366,064 4,539 21,395 16,455 5.8 4.5 20,268 511 317,283 –9,663 46,195 125.0Gloucester . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 153,038 134,863 18,175 7,165 4,875 4.7 3.6 5,946 302 85,784 8,008 33,701 91.2Hudson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 294,070 297,756 –3,686 16,117 14,341 5.5 4.8 13,511 247 219,803 1,944 47,965 129.8Hunterdon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73,056 67,949 5,107 2,417 1,586 3.3 2.3 4,169 267 44,623 2,064 48,958 132.4

Mercer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 201,847 180,191 21,656 8,384 5,878 4.2 3.3 9,983 334 185,383 11,266 46,390 125.5Middlesex. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 427,703 401,163 26,540 18,460 13,331 4.3 3.3 21,252 654 389,516 –551 46,338 125.3Monmouth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 332,931 318,121 14,810 13,618 10,182 4.1 3.2 19,543 867 226,748 11,452 39,183 106.0Morris . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 274,019 261,278 12,741 9,117 6,923 3.3 2.6 17,656 95 295,818 –6,489 56,974 154.1Ocean . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 257,236 232,059 25,177 12,763 8,579 5.0 3.7 12,164 1,182 123,524 11,652 30,980 83.8





County





2004

2006 2000

Netchange,

2000–2006 2006 2000 2006 2000 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004

Amount(dol.)

Percentof

U.S.average

NEW JERSEY—Con.

Passaic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 240,340 236,288 4,052 13,384 10,800 5.6 4.6 12,469 582 169,347 –666 38,150 103.2Salem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32,137 31,550 587 1,591 1,216 5.0 3.9 1,320 23 19,414 393 41,961 113.5Somerset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 179,911 165,513 14,398 6,224 4,258 3.5 2.6 9,896 115 174,859 –891 58,717 158.8Sussex . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85,256 79,538 5,718 3,490 2,346 4.1 2.9 3,716 173 33,603 3,079 30,221 81.7Union . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 271,831 264,749 7,082 13,164 10,260 4.8 3.9 14,725 –34 233,838 492 44,666 120.8Warren . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60,445 55,675 4,770 2,444 1,619 4.0 2.9 2,861 139 31,199 7 41,180 111.4

NEW MEXICO . . . . . . . . . . . 935,350 852,293 83,057 39,727 42,269 4.2 5.0 344,205 31,423 3580,576 331,224 328,957 378.3

Bernalillo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 313,412 289,826 23,586 12,233 11,649 3.9 4.0 15,918 248 252,666 2,392 31,618 85.5Catron . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,523 1,460 63 82 98 5.4 6.7 62 –4 279 23 17,763 48.1Chaves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26,960 25,826 1,134 1,220 1,448 4.5 5.6 1,477 –31 15,534 360 22,546 61.0Cibola . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,730 9,967 1,763 565 683 4.8 6.9 366 24 6,809 796 24,361 65.9Colfax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,620 7,000 –380 299 351 4.5 5.0 528 27 4,242 68 20,658 55.9

Curry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21,111 18,723 2,388 752 875 3.6 4.7 1,068 9 13,252 2,282 21,181 57.3De Baca. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 896 969 –73 37 46 4.1 4.7 59 –2 325 –55 19,572 52.9Dona Ana. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86,216 76,425 9,791 4,092 4,695 4.7 6.1 3,422 211 42,580 5,530 23,710 64.1Eddy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25,367 23,273 2,094 928 1,322 3.7 5.7 1,164 –61 16,665 1,107 30,967 83.8Grant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,455 12,870 –415 551 749 4.4 5.8 705 25 7,366 –363 26,589 71.9

Guadalupe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,889 1,797 92 102 131 5.4 7.3 98 –8 1,097 82 19,210 52.0Harding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 383 420 –37 17 18 4.4 4.3 16 –1 41 –2 18,317 49.5Hidalgo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,768 2,649 119 94 181 3.4 6.8 111 2 945 89 18,578 50.3Lea . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26,803 22,646 4,157 865 1,191 3.2 5.3 1,409 13 16,285 2,301 27,264 73.8Lincoln. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,605 9,668 937 427 410 4.0 4.2 762 55 5,382 872 20,857 56.4

Los Alamos . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,329 10,512 817 282 323 2.5 3.1 440 10 6,261 –81 36,638 99.1Luna . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,960 10,820 2,140 1,369 1,679 10.6 15.5 421 13 4,807 1,331 19,287 52.2McKinley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26,897 24,595 2,302 1,509 1,621 5.6 6.6 1,030 –26 16,304 1,409 23,198 62.8Mora . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,034 1,971 63 178 208 8.8 10.6 64 9 428 70 20,523 55.5Otero. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26,334 24,383 1,951 1,155 1,300 4.4 5.3 1,047 22 11,961 –520 20,877 56.5

Quay . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,101 4,468 –367 193 221 4.7 4.9 260 –29 1,949 –231 19,212 52.0Rio Arriba. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21,934 19,217 2,717 1,064 1,167 4.9 6.1 692 40 7,223 681 22,900 61.9Roosevelt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,424 8,026 1,398 305 355 3.2 4.4 352 5 3,689 1,067 20,494 55.4Sandoval . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51,400 43,281 8,119 2,253 1,842 4.4 4.3 1,404 183 21,953 2,205 37,164 100.5San Juan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55,944 49,687 6,257 2,438 2,860 4.4 5.8 2,657 170 36,221 1,881 30,664 82.9

San Miguel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,524 12,600 924 661 733 4.9 5.8 494 –13 6,193 1,247 36,408 98.5Santa Fe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76,977 70,763 6,214 2,710 2,568 3.5 3.6 5,034 365 47,761 3,066 29,869 80.8Sierra . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,524 5,275 249 253 234 4.6 4.4 249 –28 2,194 149 17,283 46.8Socorro . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,401 7,976 1,425 355 403 3.8 5.1 270 –2 2,756 205 25,415 68.7

Taos . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,606 15,384 2,222 976 1,048 5.5 6.8 1,219 79 8,855 367 20,903 56.5Torrance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,768 7,585 183 338 380 4.4 5.0 235 12 2,180 334 20,311 54.9Union . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,053 2,073 –20 62 77 3.0 3.7 113 –8 857 70 19,516 52.8Valencia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31,407 30,166 1,241 1,364 1,407 4.3 4.7 899 48 11,192 2,234 19,644 53.1

NEW YORK. . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,498,563 9,166,972 331,591 425,830 415,531 4.5 4.5 3511,440 319,367 37,433,686 380,477 347,521 3128.5

Albany . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 160,451 155,109 5,342 6,075 5,162 3.8 3.3 9,226 350 171,625 3,116 36,209 97.9Allegany. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23,650 22,800 850 1,247 1,108 5.3 4.9 842 –11 12,522 833 21,359 57.8Bronx . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 506,221 486,596 19,625 32,863 34,793 6.5 7.2 15,431 1,336 213,672 7,300 36,440 98.6Broome . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97,293 98,223 –930 4,462 3,540 4.6 3.6 4,273 –26 79,338 –3,665 29,277 79.2Cattaraugus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42,098 41,195 903 2,143 1,853 5.1 4.5 1,859 –1 24,069 –348 26,009 70.4

Cayuga . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42,195 40,432 1,763 1,987 1,570 4.7 3.9 1,618 79 18,745 283 27,946 75.6Chautauqua . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66,898 68,217 –1,319 3,001 2,715 4.5 4.0 3,118 –5 44,626 –2,725 26,169 70.8Chemung . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40,837 42,711 –1,874 1,985 1,834 4.9 4.3 1,920 3 32,766 –2,389 29,354 79.4Chenango . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24,704 24,413 291 1,193 972 4.8 4.0 988 –18 12,009 –356 28,645 77.5Clinton. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40,176 38,609 1,567 2,119 1,815 5.3 4.7 1,903 53 26,566 3,016 28,001 75.7

Columbia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32,284 31,627 657 1,200 1,068 3.7 3.4 1,748 89 16,358 600 29,238 79.1Cortland. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23,842 24,187 –345 1,233 1,055 5.2 4.4 1,100 57 15,917 –198 24,043 65.0Delaware . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23,642 22,186 1,456 1,018 908 4.3 4.1 1,212 82 13,073 689 29,164 78.9Dutchess . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 148,416 139,432 8,984 5,551 4,486 3.7 3.2 7,496 735 98,683 7,635 38,316 103.6Erie . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 472,200 467,713 4,487 23,072 19,508 4.9 4.2 22,834 492 410,777 –1,721 31,666 85.7

Essex . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18,782 18,535 247 1,044 879 5.6 4.7 1,189 –7 10,004 64 27,147 73.4Franklin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22,743 22,072 671 1,247 1,282 5.5 5.8 1,104 14 10,803 309 23,491 63.5Fulton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27,223 26,435 788 1,449 1,216 5.3 4.6 1,174 91 16,589 3,264 25,969 70.2Genesee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33,308 32,694 614 1,514 1,285 4.5 3.9 1,370 31 16,704 –160 27,197 73.6Greene . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24,120 22,439 1,681 1,137 1,017 4.7 4.5 1,169 35 10,707 975 23,378 63.2

Hamilton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,105 2,866 239 169 156 5.4 5.4 201 –10 787 53 25,485 68.9Herkimer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31,665 31,617 48 1,575 1,336 5.0 4.2 1,180 –3 12,986 –897 25,452 68.9Jefferson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48,764 45,267 3,497 2,658 2,670 5.5 5.9 2,357 51 26,699 315 26,902 72.8Kings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,069,722 1,042,605 27,117 56,296 66,485 5.3 6.4 42,329 4,174 465,242 33,450 32,684 88.4Lewis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,210 12,717 493 684 654 5.2 5.1 514 –41 4,408 –381 26,836 72.6

Livingston. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32,856 32,938 –82 1,561 1,335 4.8 4.1 1,328 89 12,995 455 25,212 68.2Madison. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36,119 35,077 1,042 1,675 1,346 4.6 3.8 1,473 96 17,680 –2,368 26,743 72.3Monroe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 376,027 376,868 –841 16,127 13,309 4.3 3.5 17,013 174 354,988 –7,785 36,514 98.8Montgomery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25,000 23,662 1,338 1,382 1,108 5.5 4.7 1,096 –37 14,788 –1,534 27,492 74.4Nassau . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 696,597 677,947 18,650 25,837 22,486 3.7 3.3 48,068 867 568,108 5,758 40,811 110.4





County





2004

2006 2000

Netchange,

2000–2006 2006 2000 2006 2000 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004

Amount(dol.)

Percentof

U.S.average

NEW YORK—Con.

New York . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 903,771 855,263 48,508 38,360 43,413 4.2 5.1 104,728 –3,053 1,988,296 –92,579 80,013 216.4Niagara . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111,811 109,900 1,911 5,980 5,124 5.3 4.7 4,517 23 61,979 –3,174 29,641 80.2Oneida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110,990 110,667 323 4,748 4,254 4.3 3.8 5,037 71 91,010 3,218 28,498 77.1Onondaga . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 234,384 230,882 3,502 9,940 8,112 4.2 3.5 12,051 449 223,649 –5,066 33,629 91.0Ontario . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56,831 54,551 2,280 2,464 1,929 4.3 3.5 2,768 212 41,577 2,044 29,347 79.4

Orange . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 179,483 162,436 17,047 7,451 5,492 4.2 3.4 8,868 792 103,420 9,459 30,893 83.6Orleans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,984 20,295 –311 1,114 945 5.6 4.7 694 10 7,461 93 23,836 64.5Oswego . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60,245 58,778 1,467 3,421 2,803 5.7 4.8 2,065 42 25,011 354 30,409 82.3Otsego . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32,267 29,750 2,517 1,398 1,249 4.3 4.2 1,401 54 18,594 977 28,626 77.4Putnam . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56,546 52,437 4,109 1,953 1,516 3.5 2.9 2,911 287 21,591 2,494 35,807 96.9

Queens . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,090,666 1,064,279 26,387 47,823 56,560 4.4 5.3 40,305 3,996 478,584 2,914 35,988 97.4Rensselaer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84,392 80,998 3,394 3,380 2,923 4.0 3.6 2,918 188 43,302 1,348 31,615 85.5Richmond. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 231,593 217,176 14,417 10,198 11,059 4.4 5.1 7,984 521 87,414 2,741 32,201 87.1Rockland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152,457 145,323 7,134 5,608 4,752 3.7 3.3 9,068 476 103,241 2,721 36,651 99.1St. Lawrence . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49,747 49,397 350 2,821 2,794 5.7 5.7 2,119 –37 28,174 –66 27,390 74.1

Saratoga . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120,805 110,908 9,897 4,192 3,662 3.5 3.3 4,673 536 60,697 6,904 30,990 83.8Schenectady. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75,941 72,745 3,196 3,049 2,519 4.0 3.5 3,048 86 50,696 1,098 34,782 94.1Schoharie. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,987 15,226 761 800 647 5.0 4.2 594 21 5,820 130 25,975 70.3Schuyler. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,968 9,405 563 498 418 5.0 4.4 333 –13 3,171 73 23,939 64.8Seneca . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,423 15,909 1,514 777 677 4.5 4.3 683 25 7,883 170 27,531 74.5

Steuben . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44,945 48,074 –3,129 2,319 1,950 5.2 4.1 1,853 81 27,550 –5,222 36,437 98.6Suffolk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 785,622 735,894 49,728 30,527 25,175 3.9 3.4 46,933 3,468 560,912 38,112 39,070 105.7Sullivan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35,352 33,174 2,178 1,726 1,439 4.9 4.3 2,072 167 18,618 –40 26,805 72.5Tioga. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26,532 26,530 2 1,122 905 4.2 3.4 769 –31 12,397 4,052 41,058 111.1Tompkins . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55,144 50,951 4,193 1,860 1,689 3.4 3.3 2,188 63 46,910 5,110 27,031 73.1

Ulster . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92,748 88,709 4,039 3,803 3,154 4.1 3.6 4,796 438 50,302 4,573 26,738 72.3Warren . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35,834 33,258 2,576 1,612 1,380 4.5 4.1 2,369 50 32,942 –2,190 29,456 79.7Washington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32,363 30,077 2,286 1,319 1,114 4.1 3.7 1,096 22 10,034 –82 28,653 77.5Wayne . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48,908 48,940 –32 2,241 1,860 4.6 3.8 1,825 152 21,323 248 29,232 79.1Westchester . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 486,643 465,289 21,354 18,227 15,659 3.7 3.4 32,068 1,298 391,438 –1,301 50,284 136.0Wyoming . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21,990 20,457 1,533 1,054 963 4.8 4.7 825 22 9,444 558 27,124 73.4Yates. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,045 12,108 937 540 444 4.1 3.7 531 32 5,353 –56 22,086 59.7

NORTH CAROLINA . . . . . . . 4,464,875 4,123,812 341,063 214,256 154,577 4.8 3.7 3213,057 39,154 33,365,633 3–19,859 332,556 388.1

Alamance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69,955 69,342 613 3,866 2,197 5.5 3.2 3,286 –62 57,848 –2,130 29,124 78.8Alexander. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18,499 19,370 –871 902 535 4.9 2.8 575 –2 7,642 –1,103 23,979 64.9Alleghany . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,999 5,636 –637 252 340 5.0 6.0 295 11 2,750 –564 21,876 59.2Anson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,119 11,010 109 817 582 7.3 5.3 451 –8 5,299 –920 26,567 71.9Ashe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,858 12,492 366 736 641 5.7 5.1 575 39 6,061 43 22,982 62.2

Avery. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,005 7,937 68 402 320 5.0 4.0 580 28 5,619 –531 20,251 54.8Beaufort . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,468 20,675 –207 1,204 1,258 5.9 6.1 1,170 6 13,636 –1,839 27,103 73.3Bertie . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,814 8,376 438 584 594 6.6 7.1 383 –2 5,420 32 19,474 52.7Bladen. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,390 14,670 720 991 902 6.4 6.1 525 6 10,362 –1,076 23,308 63.0Brunswick. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45,420 35,447 9,973 2,064 1,614 4.5 4.6 2,096 413 20,079 2,403 28,604 77.4

Buncombe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118,930 107,642 11,288 4,525 3,390 3.8 3.1 6,770 389 97,927 –1,098 28,195 76.3Burke . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42,036 46,257 –4,221 2,434 1,643 5.8 3.6 1,561 –6 26,240 –7,403 27,187 73.5Cabarrus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80,899 71,950 8,949 3,354 2,189 4.1 3.0 3,642 467 53,319 498 31,686 85.7Caldwell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40,227 42,404 –2,177 3,031 1,240 7.5 2.9 1,512 –56 25,452 –5,626 25,870 70.0Camden. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,528 3,314 1,214 195 99 4.3 3.0 126 21 608 33 22,808 61.7

Carteret . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33,409 29,593 3,816 1,385 1,232 4.1 4.2 2,010 89 18,303 580 22,544 61.0Caswell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,803 10,879 –76 778 409 7.2 3.8 249 20 1,690 –60 19,989 54.1Catawba . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77,785 80,222 –2,437 4,210 2,222 5.4 2.8 4,424 9 85,707 –8,955 29,645 80.2Chatham . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32,233 26,810 5,423 1,260 742 3.9 2.8 973 38 12,179 –957 26,571 71.9Cherokee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,617 11,466 –849 574 742 5.4 6.5 655 43 7,035 –2,493 22,322 60.4

Chowan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,082 6,484 598 357 258 5.0 4.0 384 32 4,558 269 23,088 62.5Clay . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,696 4,032 664 184 165 3.9 4.1 251 24 1,516 39 22,189 60.0Cleveland. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48,052 48,968 –916 3,089 2,432 6.4 5.0 2,154 –21 31,489 –1,805 28,338 76.7Columbus. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23,842 23,509 333 1,353 1,819 5.7 7.7 1,169 –42 14,142 –138 25,065 67.8Craven. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41,865 38,558 3,307 1,844 1,612 4.4 4.2 2,238 63 29,667 1,046 28,677 77.6

Cumberland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130,734 119,209 11,525 7,201 5,339 5.5 4.5 5,470 165 88,406 –722 25,979 70.3Currituck . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,408 9,213 3,195 429 255 3.5 2.8 607 156 4,505 1,368 24,159 65.4Dare . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22,689 18,771 3,918 1,030 813 4.5 4.3 2,020 324 15,031 2,488 26,137 70.7Davidson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80,049 79,558 491 4,740 2,601 5.9 3.3 2,834 135 40,999 –3,095 26,172 70.8Davie. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,494 18,424 2,070 865 778 4.2 4.2 750 58 8,353 –490 25,224 68.2

Duplin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23,560 23,408 152 1,234 1,017 5.2 4.3 890 –62 12,203 294 22,133 59.9Durham . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135,753 122,130 13,623 5,338 3,619 3.9 3.0 6,090 139 159,008 –4,162 48,917 132.3Edgecombe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24,750 25,057 –307 1,996 1,470 8.1 5.9 953 –1 19,938 2,757 30,452 82.4Forsyth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 173,132 161,676 11,456 7,517 5,213 4.3 3.2 8,614 121 170,822 –3,677 36,791 99.5Franklin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27,373 24,405 2,968 1,135 796 4.1 3.3 850 94 8,803 653 30,852 83.5





County





2004

2006 2000

Netchange,

2000–2006 2006 2000 2006 2000 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004

Amount(dol.)

Percentof

U.S.average

NORTH CAROLINA—Con.

Gaston . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100,564 99,985 579 5,491 5,515 5.5 5.5 4,043 –158 61,467 –9,301 28,368 76.7Gates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,001 4,651 350 199 160 4.0 3.4 139 5 992 9 21,661 58.6Graham . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,173 3,812 361 267 253 6.4 6.6 179 –3 1,848 50 25,540 69.1Granville . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24,395 22,502 1,893 1,284 995 5.3 4.4 811 26 14,480 592 30,014 81.2Greene . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,301 8,601 700 506 402 5.4 4.7 232 25 1,827 –195 19,666 53.2

Guilford . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 246,850 232,961 13,889 11,589 7,659 4.7 3.3 13,829 168 254,754 –11,335 34,445 93.2Halifax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24,100 22,914 1,186 1,586 1,392 6.6 6.1 1,155 23 14,595 –713 23,508 63.6Harnett . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46,958 42,271 4,687 2,321 1,613 4.9 3.8 1,557 85 19,360 –1,434 23,124 62.6Haywood . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28,062 25,868 2,194 1,141 1,013 4.1 3.9 1,460 58 15,629 584 24,329 65.8Henderson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47,792 42,194 5,598 1,739 1,277 3.6 3.0 2,522 317 32,914 2,919 29,042 78.6

Hertford . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,820 9,509 311 551 496 5.6 5.2 550 –10 7,926 165 24,560 66.4Hoke . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18,857 14,478 4,379 1,048 833 5.6 5.8 331 48 5,477 751 19,651 53.2Hyde . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,667 2,867 –200 147 165 5.5 5.8 162 –17 775 –269 23,796 64.4Iredell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76,887 65,911 10,976 3,376 2,318 4.4 3.5 3,757 436 56,888 7,366 29,492 79.8Jackson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21,573 17,197 4,376 798 680 3.7 4.0 999 98 9,214 914 25,213 68.2

Johnston . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74,735 64,032 10,703 2,948 1,865 3.9 2.9 2,878 317 33,467 3,831 26,395 71.4Jones . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,056 4,668 388 223 213 4.4 4.6 146 –15 1,279 78 23,141 62.6Lee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26,376 24,612 1,764 1,435 990 5.4 4.0 1,403 21 24,066 –1,289 30,634 82.9Lenoir . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27,576 27,746 –170 1,573 1,466 5.7 5.3 1,484 –31 23,898 –3,313 25,836 69.9Lincoln. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37,967 34,773 3,194 1,915 1,315 5.0 3.8 1,496 135 18,764 –1,812 26,060 70.5

McDowell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21,101 21,414 –313 1,311 927 6.2 4.3 766 –20 14,681 –733 24,858 67.2Macon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,243 14,114 2,129 727 552 4.5 3.9 1,192 113 9,908 1,043 25,000 67.6Madison. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,049 9,373 676 424 352 4.2 3.8 324 9 3,008 –159 21,842 59.1Martin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,949 11,802 147 672 822 5.6 7.0 526 –12 5,927 184 22,434 60.7Mecklenburg . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 447,144 395,586 51,558 20,019 11,697 4.5 3.0 25,600 1,355 497,949 –745 42,802 115.8

Mitchell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,612 7,768 –156 483 352 6.3 4.5 390 11 4,801 –270 24,527 66.3Montgomery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,318 12,753 –435 832 503 6.8 3.9 541 –14 8,837 –937 26,304 71.2Moore . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36,440 34,607 1,833 1,761 1,261 4.8 3.6 2,164 40 26,729 4 27,401 74.1Nash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45,100 43,498 1,602 2,506 2,006 5.6 4.6 2,239 –67 36,574 –4,201 28,156 76.2New Hanover . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103,840 87,641 16,199 3,818 3,222 3.7 3.7 6,504 494 83,170 5,731 29,846 80.7

Northampton. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,079 8,694 385 527 475 5.8 5.5 321 –4 4,032 932 22,606 61.2Onslow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58,957 53,185 5,772 2,726 2,327 4.6 4.4 2,587 –15 30,976 1,799 20,266 54.8Orange . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67,975 64,791 3,184 2,273 1,638 3.3 2.5 3,067 179 39,810 3,785 31,748 85.9Pamlico . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,859 5,420 439 266 221 4.5 4.1 225 –6 1,832 19 22,000 59.5Pasquotank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,854 15,421 2,433 897 587 5.0 3.8 940 12 11,285 754 24,784 67.0

Pender . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23,210 19,444 3,766 978 804 4.2 4.1 841 144 6,721 1,148 22,019 59.6Perquimans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,336 4,774 562 279 188 5.2 3.9 191 6 1,508 167 19,759 53.5Person. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,612 18,151 1,461 1,212 795 6.2 4.4 789 42 10,365 –422 28,292 76.5Pitt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76,671 69,869 6,802 4,043 2,938 5.3 4.2 3,342 123 54,048 1,001 26,826 72.6Polk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,455 8,494 961 336 310 3.6 3.6 463 13 3,688 –88 23,995 64.9

Randolph . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76,846 72,291 4,555 3,577 2,484 4.7 3.4 2,728 –50 44,577 –2,546 27,267 73.8Richmond. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,266 20,888 –622 1,555 1,122 7.7 5.4 955 –32 14,072 201 20,303 54.9Robeson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54,231 53,606 625 3,377 3,626 6.2 6.8 1,942 –48 31,709 –1,753 23,753 64.3Rockingham . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46,747 46,129 618 2,789 2,232 6.0 4.8 1,818 33 25,811 –3,063 27,072 73.2Rowan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69,799 65,487 4,312 3,518 2,957 5.0 4.5 2,588 106 42,783 –4,819 29,778 80.6

Rutherford . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29,804 30,987 –1,183 2,352 1,819 7.9 5.9 1,374 78 18,432 –3,135 24,897 67.3Sampson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31,450 28,831 2,619 1,447 1,022 4.6 3.5 1,062 –12 13,566 440 24,924 67.4Scotland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,939 15,725 –786 1,338 1,010 9.0 6.4 682 –44 13,608 –3,380 25,304 68.4Stanly . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30,314 29,826 488 1,561 1,164 5.1 3.9 1,404 2 17,259 –1,801 25,377 68.6Stokes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24,584 23,922 662 1,067 841 4.3 3.5 644 36 5,461 –113 23,577 63.8

Surry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35,139 36,968 –1,829 1,828 1,509 5.2 4.1 1,804 –38 32,070 –2,789 27,618 74.7Swain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,165 6,197 968 412 554 5.8 8.9 423 20 5,669 126 23,995 64.9Transylvania . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,597 13,391 –794 544 437 4.3 3.3 785 27 7,665 –1,929 23,617 63.9Tyrrell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,107 1,882 225 125 139 5.9 7.4 70 –9 353 6 20,031 54.2Union . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86,298 67,195 19,103 3,450 1,884 4.0 2.8 3,545 639 42,982 3,777 30,059 81.3

Vance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18,934 20,240 –1,306 1,433 1,387 7.6 6.9 919 –15 13,252 –1,456 24,826 67.2Wake. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 426,125 366,028 60,097 15,507 8,875 3.6 2.4 22,316 1,856 347,541 14,797 36,480 98.7Warren . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,903 8,130 –227 512 494 6.5 6.1 246 –19 2,355 104 20,663 55.9Washington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,130 5,963 167 415 322 6.8 5.4 267 – 3,632 –39 34,654 93.7Watauga . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23,898 23,232 666 911 678 3.8 2.9 1,598 – 15,610 –321 23,460 63.5

Wayne . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52,314 50,900 1,414 2,513 2,043 4.8 4.0 2,303 –37 39,874 2,157 25,223 68.2Wilkes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31,367 33,989 –2,622 1,739 1,220 5.5 3.6 1,324 –12 22,182 –978 35,369 95.7Wilson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40,129 37,197 2,932 2,877 2,089 7.2 5.6 1,821 7 33,472 –1,363 30,791 83.3Yadkin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,750 19,064 686 853 684 4.3 3.6 639 –28 7,781 –885 23,523 63.6Yancey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,055 8,508 –453 453 314 5.6 3.7 344 –2 3,306 –453 22,912 62.0

NORTH DAKOTA . . . . . . . . . 357,960 345,881 12,079 11,601 10,101 3.2 2.9 320,822 3683 3265,663 310,485 327,531 374.5

Adams. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,299 1,327 –28 39 34 3.0 2.6 94 –18 686 –69 22,891 61.9Barnes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,878 6,081 –203 216 188 3.7 3.1 398 34 4,351 401 19,907 53.9Benson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,712 2,640 72 163 155 6.0 5.9 111 2 1,187 52 22,314 60.4Billings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 510 492 18 13 13 2.5 2.6 27 –2 148 –38 30,081 81.4Bottineau . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,408 3,514 –106 129 130 3.8 3.7 262 –3 1,680 30 20,429 55.3





County





2004

2006 2000

Netchange,

2000–2006 2006 2000 2006 2000 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004

Amount(dol.)

Percentof

U.S.average

NORTH DAKOTA—Con.

Bowman. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,760 1,818 –58 40 36 2.3 2.0 152 –14 936 –88 20,684 56.0Burke . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,014 1,062 –48 27 30 2.7 2.8 89 5 320 28 23,325 63.1Burleigh . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45,219 40,517 4,702 1,194 943 2.6 2.3 2,437 113 36,096 1,009 29,838 80.7Cass . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83,463 76,118 7,345 2,134 1,620 2.6 2.1 4,527 354 79,593 6,263 30,879 83.5Cavalier . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,118 2,377 –259 73 76 3.4 3.2 173 –10 1,194 –82 23,432 63.4

Dickey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,006 3,091 –85 83 62 2.8 2.0 212 8 1,838 130 20,157 54.5Divide . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 948 1,075 –127 36 29 3.8 2.7 90 6 539 – 17,616 47.7Dunn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,727 1,780 –53 57 55 3.3 3.1 77 –4 577 –125 18,629 50.4Eddy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,309 1,376 –67 68 56 5.2 4.1 78 –3 547 –7 22,724 61.5Emmons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,818 2,097 –279 90 84 5.0 4.0 136 –6 866 –348 20,734 56.1

Foster . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,705 1,976 –271 58 54 3.4 2.7 151 –5 1,385 –213 24,359 65.9Golden Valley . . . . . . . . . . . . . 842 919 –77 28 27 3.3 2.9 75 5 505 50 17,550 47.5Grand Forks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38,194 36,299 1,895 1,163 1,022 3.0 2.8 1,781 42 28,558 903 27,320 73.9Grant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,233 1,375 –142 46 40 3.7 2.9 71 –11 452 –24 18,781 50.8Griggs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,302 1,382 –80 42 32 3.2 2.3 100 –11 810 –107 20,804 56.3

Hettinger . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,175 1,269 –94 41 37 3.5 2.9 111 12 416 7 20,639 55.8Kidder . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,259 1,315 –56 60 58 4.8 4.4 69 8 443 63 18,354 49.7LaMoure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,267 2,308 –41 72 62 3.2 2.7 146 6 978 96 21,343 57.7Logan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 953 1,053 –100 30 27 3.1 2.6 77 11 360 –69 18,531 50.1McHenry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,775 2,840 –65 140 137 5.0 4.8 136 3 655 –2 23,073 62.4

McIntosh . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,473 1,573 –100 43 41 2.9 2.6 130 7 1,001 28 19,004 51.4McKenzie . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,789 2,704 85 89 83 3.2 3.1 158 –6 1,026 –110 24,444 66.1McLean . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,605 4,600 5 210 211 4.6 4.6 246 7 1,843 –49 32,591 88.2Mercer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,780 4,539 241 181 194 3.8 4.3 227 –27 3,678 160 42,448 114.8Morton. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,816 13,995 821 483 417 3.3 3.0 703 55 7,809 783 29,930 81.0

Mountrail . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,875 3,047 –172 176 139 6.1 4.6 198 4 1,401 –235 21,394 57.9Nelson. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,672 1,837 –165 72 67 4.3 3.6 137 – 753 –42 18,732 50.7Oliver . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,074 1,137 –63 44 46 4.1 4.0 42 8 405 9 55,551 150.3Pembina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,075 4,731 –656 253 242 6.2 5.1 320 –13 2,988 32 23,580 63.8Pierce . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,879 2,213 –334 85 72 4.5 3.3 160 10 1,548 –22 21,225 57.4

Ramsey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,866 6,244 –378 242 204 4.1 3.3 427 9 4,572 236 20,532 55.5Ransom . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,157 3,127 30 125 70 4.0 2.2 213 8 1,513 18 22,778 61.6Renville . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,305 1,318 –13 41 33 3.1 2.5 97 –4 527 –22 24,751 67.0Richland. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,991 9,468 –477 317 255 3.5 2.7 519 –31 6,838 –200 26,284 71.1Rolette. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,065 5,281 –216 470 499 9.3 9.4 210 –3 2,661 –298 22,280 60.3

Sargent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,509 2,372 137 95 55 3.8 2.3 138 9 1,956 –133 37,859 102.4Sheridan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 700 799 –99 38 41 5.4 5.1 50 2 167 –23 23,575 63.8Sioux. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,325 1,276 49 92 72 6.9 5.6 26 –5 932 73 24,988 67.6Slope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 517 430 87 12 11 2.3 2.6 10 –2 57 18 30,439 82.3Stark . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,567 12,436 1,131 356 348 2.6 2.8 892 39 9,417 944 24,646 66.7

Steele . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,112 1,186 –74 29 23 2.6 1.9 66 –11 337 –70 30,045 81.3Stutsman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,811 11,956 –145 360 296 3.0 2.5 673 17 8,606 –913 22,913 62.0Towner. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,189 1,453 –264 63 40 5.3 2.8 97 3 753 –13 17,928 48.5Traill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,197 4,307 –110 155 120 3.7 2.8 314 7 2,458 27 23,107 62.5

Walsh . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,779 6,516 –737 272 229 4.7 3.5 438 –1 3,645 –426 22,857 61.8Ward . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28,274 28,244 30 901 897 3.2 3.2 1,632 6 24,222 2,415 22,785 61.6Wells . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,189 2,371 –182 103 91 4.7 3.8 207 4 1,365 –35 19,540 52.9Williams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,479 10,628 1,851 256 303 2.1 2.9 828 29 6,806 –26 25,610 69.3

OHIO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,933,957 5,807,036 126,921 324,901 233,882 5.5 4.0 3271,733 31,224 34,762,205 3–239,775 334,135 392.3

Adams. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,238 12,553 685 1,005 888 7.6 7.1 434 –2 4,522 59 23,505 63.6Allen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52,555 51,592 963 3,207 2,248 6.1 4.4 2,765 –74 50,687 –1,152 29,309 79.3Ashland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27,110 27,106 4 1,499 1,067 5.5 3.9 1,092 34 17,026 –1,246 28,568 77.3Ashtabula. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50,235 50,529 –294 3,339 2,425 6.6 4.8 2,238 –17 28,283 –2,315 26,104 70.6Athens. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30,515 27,782 2,733 1,801 1,475 5.9 5.3 1,166 –18 13,110 –468 21,310 57.6

Auglaize. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26,937 25,155 1,782 1,137 838 4.2 3.3 1,026 –12 18,268 362 29,698 80.3Belmont . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32,494 31,019 1,475 1,915 1,874 5.9 6.0 1,635 8 20,091 620 22,758 61.6Brown . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22,326 20,648 1,678 1,515 1,055 6.8 5.1 578 –19 5,765 –869 25,932 70.1Butler . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 189,698 173,564 16,134 10,675 6,204 5.6 3.6 6,892 587 121,556 7,134 34,297 92.8Carroll . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,035 14,169 –134 851 612 6.1 4.3 473 –11 4,910 –230 23,483 63.5

Champaign. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,746 20,538 208 1,057 732 5.1 3.6 707 3 10,106 522 28,160 76.2Clark . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70,432 72,367 –1,935 3,968 3,106 5.6 4.3 2,629 –81 44,858 –6,213 27,841 75.3Clermont . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105,638 95,756 9,882 5,359 3,482 5.1 3.6 3,606 329 51,629 3,523 31,880 86.2Clinton. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24,218 21,917 2,301 1,155 778 4.8 3.5 807 1 21,967 –1,779 34,045 92.1Columbiana . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53,454 54,322 –868 3,458 2,593 6.5 4.8 2,364 17 28,182 –1,517 25,306 68.5

Coshocton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,658 18,229 –571 1,227 781 6.9 4.3 725 –20 12,377 –1,249 28,326 76.6Crawford . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22,787 23,501 –714 1,472 1,001 6.5 4.3 956 –9 14,652 –1,954 28,263 76.5Cuyahoga . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 663,367 693,725 –30,358 36,702 28,168 5.5 4.1 37,192 –1,014 689,876 –89,033 39,199 106.0Darke . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27,842 27,886 –44 1,586 1,094 5.7 3.9 1,256 –5 16,047 –636 27,371 74.0Defiance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,677 21,252 –575 1,154 787 5.6 3.7 881 12 15,185 –1,730 35,753 96.7





County





2004

2006 2000

Netchange,

2000–2006 2006 2000 2006 2000 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004

Amount(dol.)

Percentof

U.S.average

OHIO—Con.

Delaware . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84,846 62,802 22,044 3,334 1,685 3.9 2.7 3,359 840 57,759 14,885 38,656 104.6Erie . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42,663 42,152 511 2,518 1,773 5.9 4.2 2,013 –28 30,655 –2,409 30,726 83.1Fairfield . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74,172 65,660 8,512 3,571 2,168 4.8 3.3 2,632 91 30,739 –373 25,429 68.8Fayette . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,261 14,946 1,315 807 580 5.0 3.9 681 11 10,549 947 26,732 72.3Franklin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 609,718 594,317 15,401 28,649 18,659 4.7 3.1 28,564 597 597,428 –29,413 37,256 100.8

Fulton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23,387 22,691 696 1,389 908 5.9 4.0 1,106 8 18,608 –1,810 32,755 88.6Gallia. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,750 13,340 1,410 902 920 6.1 6.9 634 –15 9,572 –308 29,823 80.7Geauga . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51,002 49,120 1,882 2,258 1,532 4.4 3.1 2,733 118 28,869 –302 32,158 87.0Greene . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77,420 76,334 1,086 3,959 2,822 5.1 3.7 2,990 103 46,916 1,754 29,569 80.0Guernsey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,011 18,690 1,321 1,292 1,177 6.5 6.3 958 9 13,205 432 26,582 71.9

Hamilton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 423,493 428,880 –5,387 21,309 15,805 5.0 3.7 23,581 –1,315 493,265 –63,298 38,345 103.7Hancock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41,259 39,000 2,259 1,817 1,289 4.4 3.3 1,838 63 38,680 –1,835 34,739 94.0Hardin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,931 15,745 186 891 646 5.6 4.1 518 2 7,666 –953 23,983 64.9Harrison. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,433 7,184 249 446 367 6.0 5.1 299 –29 3,060 –28 29,592 80.0Henry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,173 15,268 905 976 650 6.0 4.3 623 1 9,181 –508 30,640 82.9

Highland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21,527 19,582 1,945 1,201 849 5.6 4.3 758 17 10,031 –468 26,759 72.4Hocking . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,987 13,161 826 872 819 6.2 6.2 543 –18 5,829 –186 21,770 58.9Holmes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,433 17,765 1,668 740 508 3.8 2.9 1,049 63 14,843 1,305 26,180 70.8Huron . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30,011 30,708 –697 2,226 1,668 7.4 5.4 1,234 –9 20,642 –2,385 31,472 85.1Jackson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,928 14,470 1,458 1,194 843 7.5 5.8 660 –1 11,022 742 24,986 67.6

Jefferson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31,402 31,719 –317 2,196 1,802 7.0 5.7 1,507 –56 24,445 2,119 24,750 67.0Knox . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30,453 27,432 3,021 1,544 1,125 5.1 4.1 1,148 39 18,953 1,721 30,601 82.8Lake . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131,393 129,228 2,165 6,276 4,402 4.8 3.4 6,547 167 91,178 –6,025 32,815 88.8Lawrence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29,024 26,145 2,879 1,534 1,920 5.3 7.3 859 –60 9,912 –364 21,580 58.4Licking. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82,710 77,542 5,168 4,227 2,860 5.1 3.7 3,008 144 49,222 585 28,606 77.4

Logan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25,065 24,167 898 1,168 864 4.7 3.6 950 –18 18,213 –1,482 34,525 93.4Lorain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154,436 148,879 5,557 8,910 6,172 5.8 4.1 6,036 213 89,869 –8,929 32,342 87.5Lucas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 226,172 227,291 –1,119 14,289 10,265 6.3 4.5 10,898 –217 212,853 –7,866 33,176 89.7Madison. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,089 19,368 721 1,049 665 5.2 3.4 793 68 11,871 605 29,743 80.5Mahoning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119,561 120,236 –675 7,738 6,066 6.5 5.0 6,339 –102 90,470 –9,305 27,616 74.7

Marion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32,435 31,788 647 1,754 1,323 5.4 4.2 1,331 –38 24,217 –208 28,893 78.2Medina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93,142 84,936 8,206 4,436 2,758 4.8 3.2 4,020 93 51,711 –1,542 31,137 84.2Meigs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,095 9,831 –736 772 707 8.5 7.2 339 –12 2,485 –154 19,342 52.3Mercer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24,110 21,724 2,386 906 868 3.8 4.0 1,013 39 14,256 1,762 25,970 70.3Miami . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55,059 53,949 1,110 3,001 1,892 5.5 3.5 2,258 30 36,361 –2,147 29,810 80.6

Monroe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,105 6,338 –1,233 575 445 11.3 7.0 286 7 3,607 –54 36,256 98.1Montgomery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 272,811 279,629 –6,818 16,452 11,151 6.0 4.0 12,832 –431 265,330 –24,268 35,145 95.1Morgan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,778 6,602 –824 524 437 9.1 6.6 197 –6 1,646 –597 22,414 60.6Morrow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,967 16,461 1,506 1,020 624 5.7 3.8 425 16 4,652 –457 24,307 65.8Muskingum. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39,092 42,088 –2,996 2,802 2,177 7.2 5.2 2,016 10 34,969 28 27,549 74.5

Noble . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,883 5,653 230 422 361 7.2 6.4 190 –15 2,036 –516 26,975 73.0Ottawa. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21,944 21,402 542 1,532 1,084 7.0 5.1 1,121 –36 11,220 –1,011 33,517 90.7Paulding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,660 10,497 163 520 400 4.9 3.8 323 –20 3,986 –139 25,313 68.5Perry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,593 16,145 448 1,222 853 7.4 5.3 510 12 4,672 –571 24,001 64.9Pickaway . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24,206 23,905 301 1,400 969 5.8 4.1 827 13 12,257 131 30,652 82.9

Pike . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,768 11,433 –665 951 784 8.8 6.9 468 –14 8,809 –1,823 31,940 86.4Portage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90,464 84,756 5,708 4,656 3,290 5.1 3.9 3,215 107 43,563 –3,209 30,548 82.6Preble . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21,933 21,918 15 1,318 839 6.0 3.8 727 6 9,112 –256 30,056 81.3Putnam . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,817 18,297 –480 846 596 4.7 3.3 734 11 9,210 –1,070 24,775 67.0Richland. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62,535 63,263 –728 3,807 3,189 6.1 5.0 3,013 –5 50,569 –1,218 29,713 80.4

Ross . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34,741 33,523 1,218 2,169 1,696 6.2 5.1 1,347 –16 20,817 –1,267 30,182 81.6Sandusky . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33,427 32,810 617 1,919 1,358 5.7 4.1 1,484 27 24,616 –721 29,006 78.5Scioto . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31,314 32,035 –721 2,384 2,316 7.6 7.2 1,457 –7 18,712 548 24,290 65.7Seneca . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31,431 30,949 482 1,662 1,321 5.3 4.3 1,352 9 20,191 –1,229 27,947 75.6Shelby . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28,181 25,560 2,621 1,199 985 4.3 3.9 1,068 11 25,488 –519 39,264 106.2

Stark . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 188,942 192,885 –3,943 10,998 7,933 5.8 4.1 9,391 –89 152,356 –12,130 30,258 81.9Summit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 294,232 280,304 13,928 15,613 11,613 5.3 4.1 14,535 94 253,928 –1,459 34,795 94.1Trumbull. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105,288 107,499 –2,211 6,669 5,321 6.3 4.9 4,694 –36 78,771 –9,164 33,377 90.3Tuscarawas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47,992 46,452 1,540 2,439 1,922 5.1 4.1 2,398 50 33,300 411 26,203 70.9Union . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24,853 22,220 2,633 1,132 677 4.6 3.0 909 108 22,657 1,107 49,878 134.9

Van Wert . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,643 15,788 –145 757 652 4.8 4.1 598 –24 10,276 –1,187 27,770 75.1Vinton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,713 5,442 271 451 374 7.9 6.9 159 –4 1,733 59 26,691 72.2Warren . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105,550 83,289 22,261 5,196 2,747 4.9 3.3 3,470 532 61,818 2,773 35,593 96.3Washington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32,996 31,319 1,677 1,740 1,704 5.3 5.4 1,558 –16 21,985 –1,270 28,109 76.0

Wayne . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59,994 58,933 1,061 2,789 1,963 4.6 3.3 2,622 31 41,944 –1,923 29,059 78.6Williams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,674 21,272 –1,598 1,182 744 6.0 3.5 903 –23 15,830 –1,815 29,747 80.5Wood . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68,447 66,341 2,106 3,590 2,318 5.2 3.5 2,796 162 48,928 820 32,691 88.4Wyandot . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,475 12,379 96 733 483 5.9 3.9 584 25 9,609 387 28,571 77.3





County





2004

2006 2000

Netchange,

2000–2006 2006 2000 2006 2000 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004

Amount(dol.)

Percentof

U.S.average

OKLAHOMA . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,719,628 1,661,045 58,583 68,751 51,523 4.0 3.1 387,440 32,346 31,195,043 3–6,563 329,788 380.6

Adair . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,314 9,219 1,095 454 332 4.4 3.6 229 14 2,811 –591 30,161 81.6Alfalfa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,242 2,616 –374 97 78 4.3 3.0 144 –10 802 –137 19,313 52.2Atoka . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,584 5,194 390 275 189 4.9 3.6 234 2 1,974 –13 19,851 53.7Beaver. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,890 2,943 –53 80 71 2.8 2.4 171 –2 867 –172 25,231 68.3Beckham . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,165 8,643 1,522 275 277 2.7 3.2 655 10 6,486 665 22,538 61.0

Blaine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,764 4,804 –40 202 137 4.2 2.9 286 –12 2,382 –360 22,795 61.7Bryan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,834 16,773 3,061 707 500 3.6 3.0 682 103 13,027 3,250 24,828 67.2Caddo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,570 12,162 –592 650 459 5.6 3.8 507 –23 4,287 10 24,022 65.0Canadian . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51,536 46,621 4,915 1,736 1,112 3.4 2.4 1,890 188 18,877 –161 24,718 66.9Carter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24,094 20,924 3,170 916 795 3.8 3.8 1,410 56 17,780 1,374 30,545 82.6

Cherokee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,894 18,847 2,047 888 606 4.3 3.2 719 50 7,486 107 22,364 60.5Choctaw. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,536 6,075 461 333 293 5.1 4.8 263 2 3,258 202 17,198 46.5Cimarron . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,251 1,602 –351 43 36 3.4 2.2 90 –4 434 –65 16,597 44.9Cleveland. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118,983 111,444 7,539 4,048 2,591 3.4 2.3 4,778 508 56,086 8,421 24,880 67.3Coal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,303 2,496 –193 139 108 6.0 4.3 67 3 611 –292 18,697 50.6

Comanche . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45,594 43,323 2,271 1,918 1,587 4.2 3.7 2,175 –24 29,819 2,226 25,223 68.2Cotton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,285 2,867 418 109 93 3.3 3.2 83 –13 852 358 20,379 55.1Craig . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,675 6,933 –258 285 250 4.3 3.6 354 –25 4,625 –1,101 25,484 68.9Creek . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32,258 31,973 285 1,324 1,042 4.1 3.3 1,295 20 15,491 –342 25,730 69.6Custer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,303 13,261 42 410 332 3.1 2.5 847 10 8,360 –35 24,540 66.4

Delaware . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,163 15,997 1,166 772 586 4.5 3.7 640 11 6,007 137 20,665 55.9Dewey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,345 2,276 69 75 62 3.2 2.7 127 –14 775 30 28,698 77.6Ellis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,161 2,111 50 61 57 2.8 2.7 117 –1 689 28 24,887 67.3Garfield . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28,650 28,113 537 893 797 3.1 2.8 1,651 13 20,793 1,656 28,443 76.9Garvin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,308 12,501 807 489 436 3.7 3.5 644 36 6,639 89 26,170 70.8

Grady . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23,746 22,002 1,744 1,137 649 4.8 2.9 939 11 10,737 60 22,879 61.9Grant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,328 2,569 –241 89 64 3.8 2.5 117 –21 728 –90 29,948 81.0Greer. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,029 2,269 –240 102 91 5.0 4.0 98 –15 894 54 16,110 43.6Harmon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,415 1,436 –21 52 40 3.7 2.8 76 – 479 62 18,656 50.5Harper . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,784 1,916 –132 56 41 3.1 2.1 108 –10 603 33 21,041 56.9

Haskell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,289 5,103 186 230 227 4.3 4.4 225 21 2,259 86 20,974 56.7Hughes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,958 5,559 –601 310 291 6.3 5.2 232 –14 1,936 38 17,979 48.6Jackson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,258 11,909 349 422 362 3.4 3.0 571 17 7,690 181 23,087 62.5Jefferson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,310 2,837 –527 105 103 4.5 3.6 121 –4 706 –163 16,972 45.9Johnston . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,851 4,535 316 211 165 4.3 3.6 160 4 2,123 –205 24,405 66.0

Kay . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21,456 22,042 –586 1,062 956 4.9 4.3 1,229 –27 16,140 –2,293 29,732 80.4Kingfisher . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,846 7,179 667 220 160 2.8 2.2 452 33 4,574 249 28,356 76.7Kiowa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,841 4,600 –759 185 130 4.8 2.8 215 –18 2,058 –107 18,872 51.0Latimer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,991 4,434 –443 206 212 5.2 4.8 164 3 1,643 –201 25,470 68.9Le Flore . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21,855 20,741 1,114 1,111 893 5.1 4.3 734 11 7,685 –178 21,167 57.3

Lincoln. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,802 14,893 –91 597 442 4.0 3.0 535 29 4,588 –436 22,221 60.1Logan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18,278 17,008 1,270 664 432 3.6 2.5 607 80 5,924 1,052 18,425 49.8Love . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,851 4,216 635 169 152 3.5 3.6 142 –1 1,195 –233 23,125 62.6McClain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,796 13,850 946 536 357 3.6 2.6 680 107 5,561 509 21,591 58.4McCurtain. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,700 14,852 –1,152 856 715 6.2 4.8 580 –4 8,274 –307 23,120 62.5

McIntosh . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,122 7,935 187 426 366 5.2 4.6 402 4 3,254 124 18,952 51.3Major. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,761 4,004 –243 109 95 2.9 2.4 219 6 1,701 –17 21,856 59.1Marshall . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,160 5,720 440 260 215 4.2 3.8 288 24 3,753 283 23,520 63.6Mayes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,033 18,011 –978 735 605 4.3 3.4 753 15 8,656 –1,351 26,438 71.5Murray. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,528 6,021 1,507 233 213 3.1 3.5 271 4 2,606 159 21,540 58.3

Muskogee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28,682 28,959 –277 1,496 1,131 5.2 3.9 1,573 –3 23,588 –1,448 26,756 72.4Noble . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,537 5,741 –204 200 134 3.6 2.3 206 –13 3,254 –309 30,659 82.9Nowata . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,693 4,867 –174 220 169 4.7 3.5 169 –2 1,551 243 20,181 54.6Okfuskee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,398 4,539 –141 248 178 5.6 3.9 167 –1 1,700 –108 21,739 58.8Oklahoma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 334,826 326,774 8,052 13,825 9,502 4.1 2.9 21,591 362 335,703 –9,156 31,823 86.1

Okmulgee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,018 17,116 –98 910 771 5.3 4.5 729 62 7,005 467 23,641 64.0Osage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21,076 20,844 232 853 668 4.0 3.2 508 –24 3,318 –915 19,950 54.0Ottawa. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,212 15,611 601 762 717 4.7 4.6 670 –44 7,285 –141 22,662 61.3Pawnee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,897 7,929 –32 319 297 4.0 3.7 287 –23 2,279 –432 21,704 58.7Payne . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34,256 36,207 –1,951 1,246 905 3.6 2.5 1,679 106 20,516 754 22,928 62.0

Pittsburg . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,999 17,705 3,294 869 799 4.1 4.5 899 10 10,005 194 22,014 59.5Pontotoc . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,609 16,710 2,899 718 554 3.7 3.3 914 13 11,641 –640 22,317 60.4Pottawatomie . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31,078 30,208 870 1,418 974 4.6 3.2 1,323 –7 17,142 –1,703 22,747 61.5Pushmataha . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,353 4,658 695 236 203 4.4 4.4 186 –5 1,945 206 17,122 46.3Roger Mills . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,741 1,831 –90 48 45 2.8 2.5 86 11 620 137 19,563 52.9

Rogers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40,585 36,138 4,447 1,461 978 3.6 2.7 1,418 111 18,594 3,020 29,288 79.2Seminole . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,109 10,430 –321 585 452 5.8 4.3 467 –58 4,968 –1,221 22,855 61.8Sequoyah. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18,500 17,206 1,294 1,003 751 5.4 4.4 597 –6 6,834 146 18,668 50.5Stephens . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,525 19,306 1,219 725 653 3.5 3.4 1,025 –16 12,091 –762 24,366 65.9Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,963 10,606 –1,643 302 280 3.4 2.6 472 –73 6,057 –1,214 28,102 76.0





County





2004

2006 2000

Netchange,

2000–2006 2006 2000 2006 2000 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004

Amount(dol.)

Percentof

U.S.average

OKLAHOMA—Con.

Tillman. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,438 3,803 –365 152 124 4.4 3.3 155 –11 1,447 –70 22,297 60.3Tulsa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 298,911 296,841 2,070 11,123 8,419 3.7 2.8 18,816 533 304,046 –20,819 35,201 95.2Wagoner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32,557 29,477 3,080 1,169 765 3.6 2.6 822 56 6,498 –1,085 23,478 63.5Washington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25,159 22,860 2,299 882 712 3.5 3.1 1,234 38 15,613 –1,520 35,044 94.8Washita . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,663 5,561 102 189 149 3.3 2.7 233 –6 1,560 18 19,533 52.8Woods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,160 4,570 –410 237 116 5.7 2.5 272 –6 2,278 2 19,959 54.0Woodward . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,996 9,193 1,803 298 278 2.7 3.0 740 79 7,045 889 24,395 66.0

OREGON . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,898,847 1,810,150 88,697 102,682 93,196 5.4 5.1 3105,449 34,804 31,355,542 3100 334,191 392.5

Baker . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,203 7,354 –151 473 511 6.6 6.9 548 –3 3,890 –20 24,045 65.0Benton. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42,759 41,180 1,579 2,020 1,618 4.7 3.9 1,992 65 28,090 832 33,092 89.5Clackamas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 196,681 187,388 9,293 9,464 7,691 4.8 4.1 10,333 708 125,202 9,493 36,285 98.2Clatsop . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,533 17,993 1,540 982 894 5.0 5.0 1,436 72 11,877 495 23,154 62.6Columbia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23,778 22,443 1,335 1,374 1,248 5.8 5.6 914 68 8,893 –143 32,853 88.9

Coos . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28,831 27,351 1,480 1,986 1,996 6.9 7.3 1,749 8 19,435 1,243 25,713 69.6Crook . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,618 8,649 969 577 627 6.0 7.2 485 56 4,892 –147 32,158 87.0Curry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,631 8,688 943 670 596 7.0 6.9 785 96 5,685 797 23,510 63.6Deschutes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79,505 61,406 18,099 3,683 3,305 4.6 5.4 5,498 1,008 50,488 7,602 28,964 78.3Douglas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47,712 45,191 2,521 3,609 3,330 7.6 7.4 2,823 126 32,427 2,170 28,006 75.8

Gilliam . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,002 1,149 –147 50 51 5.0 4.4 67 4 618 –25 27,018 73.1Grant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,573 3,939 –366 300 369 8.4 9.4 280 –7 1,645 71 25,073 67.8Harney. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,366 3,789 –423 275 322 8.2 8.5 187 –6 1,539 –252 24,972 67.6Hood River . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,712 11,623 1,089 705 759 5.5 6.5 846 65 8,381 702 22,205 60.1Jackson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100,965 91,561 9,404 5,822 5,069 5.8 5.5 6,009 645 67,754 5,500 28,622 77.4

Jefferson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,206 9,550 –344 527 481 5.7 5.0 362 86 4,176 –60 28,189 76.3Josephine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35,209 31,334 3,875 2,367 2,159 6.7 6.9 2,122 241 19,941 1,646 25,929 70.1Klamath . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30,583 29,385 1,198 2,073 2,178 6.8 7.4 1,680 94 16,632 –661 30,098 81.4Lake . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,673 3,389 284 280 279 7.6 8.2 207 4 1,292 –12 24,216 65.5Lane . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 178,082 170,410 7,672 9,850 9,184 5.5 5.4 9,789 99 118,928 –597 30,196 81.7

Lincoln. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22,141 21,006 1,135 1,357 1,344 6.1 6.4 1,591 –90 13,757 84 24,039 65.0Linn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52,938 51,847 1,091 3,518 3,393 6.6 6.5 2,544 –18 33,054 –826 30,806 83.3Malheur . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,687 13,290 –603 827 999 6.5 7.5 743 –15 8,328 –543 23,970 64.8Marion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 151,392 144,000 7,392 8,659 7,980 5.7 5.5 7,675 225 94,543 –72 28,753 77.8Morrow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,478 5,435 43 370 420 6.8 7.7 175 22 1,943 283 30,035 81.2

Multnomah . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 371,888 378,889 –7,001 19,256 17,928 5.2 4.7 23,551 –21 377,679 –27,163 37,726 102.1Polk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36,493 33,040 3,453 1,845 1,587 5.1 4.8 1,247 104 12,967 174 24,583 66.5Sherman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 884 1,042 –158 55 58 6.2 5.6 45 –2 342 54 13,918 37.6Tillamook . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,508 11,544 964 706 592 5.6 5.1 709 21 6,392 –25 25,437 68.8Umatilla . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36,279 35,689 590 2,485 2,197 6.8 6.2 1,600 13 21,347 1,385 26,160 70.8

Union . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,034 12,204 –170 725 663 6.0 5.4 763 43 7,170 128 26,517 71.7Wallowa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,627 3,595 32 246 262 6.8 7.3 356 25 1,572 –21 23,522 63.6Wasco . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,275 12,535 740 737 766 5.6 6.1 697 –30 6,210 –1,408 25,325 68.5Washington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 277,520 257,841 19,679 12,404 10,103 4.5 3.9 13,303 855 208,519 –5,913 44,066 119.2Wheeler . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 631 728 –97 43 51 6.8 7.0 35 –1 134 9 16,224 43.9Yamhill. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45,457 43,691 1,766 2,366 2,185 5.2 5.0 2,175 136 25,049 955 29,045 78.6

PENNSYLVANIA. . . . . . . . . . 6,306,050 6,085,833 220,217 296,192 254,931 4.7 4.2 3301,557 36,816 35,107,044 319,807 335,595 396.3

Adams. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55,280 49,432 5,848 1,861 1,583 3.4 3.2 1,908 34 27,983 –428 26,339 71.2Allegheny . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 631,994 635,816 –3,822 29,044 25,827 4.6 4.1 34,784 –67 679,552 –11,675 37,606 101.7Armstrong . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33,014 33,138 –124 1,794 1,891 5.4 5.7 1,430 –60 15,360 –1,306 24,734 66.9Beaver. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89,605 88,835 770 4,395 3,818 4.9 4.3 3,550 73 49,026 –558 28,639 77.5Bedford . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23,072 24,603 –1,531 1,341 1,362 5.8 5.5 1,094 –12 14,206 –609 24,583 66.5

Berks. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 201,584 194,612 6,972 9,021 7,679 4.5 3.9 8,488 333 144,424 –4,439 33,722 91.2Blair . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64,616 62,363 2,253 2,998 2,912 4.6 4.7 3,318 29 49,870 –1,981 27,455 74.3Bradford. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30,705 30,234 471 1,440 1,096 4.7 3.6 1,344 8 18,490 –388 28,444 76.9Bucks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 345,674 329,104 16,570 13,799 11,310 4.0 3.4 18,828 1,030 258,373 10,801 34,679 93.8Butler . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95,465 89,074 6,391 4,264 3,649 4.5 4.1 4,514 260 64,741 1,384 30,042 81.3

Cambria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67,954 66,623 1,331 3,753 4,066 5.5 6.1 3,519 –29 49,596 –1,818 25,855 69.9Cameron . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,594 2,783 –189 167 183 6.4 6.6 148 6 1,922 –173 24,467 66.2Carbon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30,836 28,993 1,843 1,812 1,498 5.9 5.2 1,157 19 12,644 –1,782 24,357 65.9Centre . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73,094 68,466 4,628 2,819 2,425 3.9 3.5 3,233 106 44,569 –2,185 27,230 73.7Chester . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 259,490 235,821 23,669 8,972 7,225 3.5 3.1 13,383 1,206 213,332 23,180 47,856 129.5

Clarion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,460 19,354 1,106 1,055 989 5.2 5.1 1,016 –22 11,614 –1,046 24,522 66.3Clearfield . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40,886 39,368 1,518 2,284 2,219 5.6 5.6 1,959 52 25,368 –1,264 25,278 68.4Clinton. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18,891 18,201 690 1,079 944 5.7 5.2 758 17 9,662 –824 24,558 66.4Columbia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34,506 31,954 2,552 1,948 1,681 5.6 5.3 1,523 6 23,814 –1,072 29,123 78.8Crawford . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42,633 42,747 –114 2,259 2,103 5.3 4.9 2,210 51 26,679 –2,042 25,876 70.0

Cumberland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121,795 113,803 7,992 4,212 3,613 3.5 3.2 5,639 69 113,422 –1,998 33,656 91.0Dauphin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136,296 131,303 4,993 5,559 4,654 4.1 3.5 6,861 281 153,390 17,273 34,863 94.3Delaware . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 282,764 277,065 5,699 12,479 10,476 4.4 3.8 13,278 –28 217,136 58 41,504 112.3Elk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,611 18,190 –579 848 885 4.8 4.9 974 –27 13,886 –1,291 29,793 80.6Erie . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140,889 140,289 600 7,318 6,380 5.2 4.5 6,759 –204 117,531 –4,869 28,266 76.5





County





2004

2006 2000

Netchange,

2000–2006 2006 2000 2006 2000 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004

Amount(dol.)

Percentof

U.S.average

PENNSYLVANIA—Con.

Fayette . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65,585 64,532 1,053 4,287 3,675 6.5 5.7 2,816 27 36,453 2,423 23,615 63.9Forest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,530 2,012 518 171 143 6.8 7.1 128 –17 1,228 82 25,180 68.1Franklin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78,727 67,502 11,225 2,532 2,535 3.2 3.8 2,940 129 45,549 3,314 28,021 75.8Fulton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,299 7,258 1,041 355 281 4.3 3.9 301 12 4,179 –1,455 38,244 103.5Greene . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,459 16,686 773 1,030 988 5.9 5.9 699 17 8,947 574 28,720 77.7

Huntingdon. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22,147 20,810 1,337 1,184 1,271 5.3 6.1 843 11 9,694 –395 23,915 64.7Indiana . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45,626 40,976 4,650 2,402 2,392 5.3 5.8 2,010 6 28,026 2,564 27,606 74.7Jefferson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22,737 21,486 1,251 1,140 1,137 5.0 5.3 1,170 –20 13,706 39 25,351 68.6Juniata . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,653 11,485 1,168 551 484 4.4 4.2 495 2 5,915 60 24,901 67.4Lackawanna . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106,211 103,625 2,586 5,352 4,651 5.0 4.5 5,440 18 95,887 2,504 27,926 75.5

Lancaster . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 267,346 250,562 16,784 9,632 7,103 3.6 2.8 11,811 371 219,344 4,764 32,242 87.2Lawrence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43,751 44,624 –873 2,402 2,190 5.5 4.9 2,126 –7 28,812 –1,417 27,145 73.4Lebanon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71,278 64,137 7,141 2,472 2,033 3.5 3.2 2,595 27 42,237 4,607 29,009 78.5Lehigh . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 173,908 162,455 11,453 8,097 5,954 4.7 3.7 8,308 129 157,244 –4,185 39,001 105.5Luzerne . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158,721 155,431 3,290 8,778 7,982 5.5 5.1 7,711 50 125,682 –1,646 28,686 77.6

Lycoming . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59,002 59,250 –248 3,182 2,573 5.4 4.3 2,810 –69 46,158 –3,289 27,547 74.5McKean . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21,826 21,858 –32 1,170 1,048 5.4 4.8 1,116 –21 14,581 –725 26,931 72.9Mercer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55,218 56,611 –1,393 3,053 2,810 5.5 5.0 3,033 81 45,865 –541 26,534 71.8Mifflin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22,564 22,163 401 1,164 951 5.2 4.3 990 64 14,297 –566 26,814 72.5Monroe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80,003 69,262 10,741 4,153 2,929 5.2 4.2 3,589 307 43,621 2,923 28,961 78.3

Montgomery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 427,798 408,793 19,005 15,777 13,002 3.7 3.2 26,164 364 496,707 –507 46,796 126.6Montour . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,081 8,597 484 377 301 4.2 3.5 398 37 11,880 75 45,858 124.1Northampton. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150,370 138,159 12,211 6,993 5,222 4.7 3.8 6,125 451 88,062 7,703 32,851 88.9Northumberland. . . . . . . . . . . . 47,187 45,403 1,784 2,557 2,049 5.4 4.5 1,742 –57 22,615 –2,082 27,875 75.4Perry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24,507 23,299 1,208 971 873 4.0 3.7 817 68 6,369 469 21,673 58.6

Philadelphia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 623,622 635,138 –11,516 39,584 35,532 6.3 5.6 26,524 742 578,955 –27,554 40,801 110.4Pike . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26,269 21,183 5,086 1,566 808 6.0 3.8 838 119 6,660 1,215 22,792 61.7Potter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,313 8,489 –176 498 382 6.0 4.5 411 –37 5,292 –802 28,383 76.8Schuylkill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71,480 69,929 1,551 4,005 4,090 5.6 5.8 3,095 –39 41,261 –2,415 28,192 76.3Snyder. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,028 19,016 1,012 848 694 4.2 3.6 867 45 14,674 1,033 25,524 69.0

Somerset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39,022 38,044 978 2,194 2,004 5.6 5.3 1,878 –38 22,858 782 24,000 64.9Sullivan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,027 2,976 51 165 142 5.5 4.8 192 18 1,446 150 21,133 57.2Susquehanna . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21,330 20,359 971 1,015 801 4.8 3.9 859 59 6,421 –21 21,658 58.6Tioga. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,277 19,993 284 1,116 888 5.5 4.4 856 1 10,078 –401 24,317 65.8Union . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,858 17,290 568 943 678 5.3 3.9 852 6 16,441 1,553 27,241 73.7

Venango . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26,772 26,777 –5 1,427 1,366 5.3 5.1 1,270 –37 16,445 –1,446 26,923 72.8Warren . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21,087 22,126 –1,039 1,086 831 5.2 3.8 942 –28 13,823 –2,046 29,394 79.5Washington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102,836 98,371 4,465 5,188 4,533 5.0 4.6 5,018 113 75,309 1,039 33,131 89.6Wayne . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25,271 22,629 2,642 1,067 1,025 4.2 4.5 1,571 151 14,040 880 24,673 66.7Westmoreland . . . . . . . . . . . . . 185,702 181,603 4,099 9,507 8,453 5.1 4.7 9,064 48 125,836 –2,583 29,985 81.1Wyoming . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,437 13,806 631 763 662 5.3 4.8 646 15 8,473 279 32,695 88.4York . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 222,476 208,958 13,518 8,916 6,999 4.0 3.3 8,547 349 157,906 4,815 32,616 88.2

RHODE ISLAND. . . . . . . . . . 577,338 543,404 33,934 29,720 22,646 5.1 4.2 330,011 31,477 3434,706 319,538 334,564 393.5

Bristol . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28,870 26,840 2,030 1,303 987 4.5 3.7 1,273 142 13,814 (NA) 26,843 72.6Kent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98,398 92,827 5,571 4,769 3,655 4.8 3.9 5,188 265 75,465 3,768 32,671 88.4Newport . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45,546 44,980 566 2,138 1,690 4.7 3.8 2,823 121 30,357 1,812 32,916 89.0Providence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 329,951 309,668 20,283 18,324 13,980 5.6 4.5 16,760 479 272,471 8,850 35,798 96.8Washington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74,571 69,092 5,479 3,185 2,336 4.3 3.4 3,889 393 42,174 6,297 33,331 90.2

SOUTH CAROLINA . . . . . . . 2,126,439 1,972,850 153,589 138,061 70,821 6.5 3.6 3101,165 34,019 31,560,573 3–40,959 329,897 380.9

Abbeville . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,322 12,470 –148 1,085 456 8.8 3.7 351 11 5,531 –1,148 26,442 71.5Aiken. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75,715 69,233 6,482 4,906 2,588 6.5 3.7 2,709 89 51,509 –923 37,630 101.8Allendale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,523 3,707 –184 405 188 11.5 5.1 152 –5 1,979 –348 27,942 75.6Anderson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85,482 83,705 1,777 5,829 2,551 6.8 3.0 3,819 94 56,775 –2,223 26,659 72.1Bamberg . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,666 6,491 175 658 325 9.9 5.0 285 –18 3,427 –339 23,980 64.9

Barnwell. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,341 10,226 –885 952 501 10.2 4.9 394 3 6,230 –149 38,396 103.9Beaufort . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60,707 51,115 9,592 3,040 1,576 5.0 3.1 4,709 422 50,746 3,575 28,730 77.7Berkeley. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74,571 65,801 8,770 4,200 2,100 5.6 3.2 2,214 409 33,084 6,495 32,228 87.2Calhoun . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,358 7,096 262 517 263 7.0 3.7 206 4 2,467 379 26,214 70.9Charleston . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 172,913 153,058 19,855 8,735 4,902 5.1 3.2 11,242 756 167,036 –2,757 29,602 80.1

Cherokee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25,196 25,539 –343 1,967 1,054 7.8 4.1 1,021 –13 18,665 –1,875 26,662 72.1Chester . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,369 16,314 55 1,685 819 10.3 5.0 565 –2 9,214 –873 29,175 78.9Chesterfield . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18,667 19,256 –589 1,812 874 9.7 4.5 755 17 12,270 –1,250 27,333 73.9Clarendon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,012 13,040 –28 1,223 691 9.4 5.3 501 –27 6,625 –257 23,640 63.9Colleton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,602 15,941 661 1,128 596 6.8 3.7 816 – 9,251 535 22,556 61.0

Darlington. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31,471 31,495 –24 2,432 1,507 7.7 4.8 1,246 –30 19,551 –2,016 30,914 83.6Dillon. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,368 13,637 –269 1,273 908 9.5 6.7 507 –34 8,340 –89 20,250 54.8Dorchester . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58,809 47,263 11,546 3,050 1,407 5.2 3.0 1,986 207 22,493 –624 23,841 64.5Edgefield . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,378 10,373 1,005 878 370 7.7 3.6 308 –32 4,563 –427 25,172 68.1Fairfield . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,912 11,062 850 1,053 539 8.8 4.9 329 6 4,720 –2,147 35,745 96.7





County





2004

2006 2000

Netchange,

2000–2006 2006 2000 2006 2000 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004

Amount(dol.)

Percentof

U.S.average

SOUTH CAROLINA—Con.

Florence. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63,153 60,326 2,827 4,610 2,430 7.3 4.0 3,270 9 56,364 14 28,367 76.7Georgetown . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28,758 25,864 2,894 2,144 1,373 7.5 5.3 1,969 175 21,403 476 26,188 70.8Greenville. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 216,797 203,590 13,207 11,729 5,294 5.4 2.6 11,744 119 220,568 –21,295 33,687 91.1Greenwood. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31,864 32,603 –739 2,568 1,370 8.1 4.2 1,534 –60 27,171 –2,168 28,950 78.3Hampton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,888 8,321 –433 586 352 7.4 4.2 437 –6 4,240 –500 27,317 73.9

Horry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 129,708 105,607 24,101 7,057 3,733 5.4 3.5 7,940 753 90,033 3,743 24,593 66.5Jasper . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,940 9,199 741 503 324 5.1 3.5 475 40 4,480 1,018 25,107 67.9Kershaw. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30,108 27,113 2,995 1,903 996 6.3 3.7 1,222 36 15,643 421 25,732 69.6Lancaster . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30,951 30,112 839 2,807 1,085 9.1 3.6 1,156 –20 14,713 –2,480 28,337 76.7Laurens . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34,412 33,920 492 2,372 1,096 6.9 3.2 890 –25 13,976 –3,175 26,660 72.1

Lee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,509 8,275 234 822 460 9.7 5.6 233 –13 2,414 –297 20,388 55.2Lexington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132,510 118,390 14,120 6,177 3,137 4.7 2.6 5,405 437 75,764 7,694 27,987 75.7McCormick . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,630 3,742 –112 402 233 11.1 6.2 125 –7 1,125 29 21,889 59.2Marion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,536 15,470 –1,934 1,648 1,421 12.2 9.2 655 – 8,356 –2,147 23,462 63.5Marlboro . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,842 12,265 577 1,422 818 11.1 6.7 405 –18 6,468 115 25,305 68.5

Newberry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,870 17,295 575 1,178 717 6.6 4.1 750 19 11,229 –209 26,672 72.2Oconee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30,918 32,353 –1,435 2,792 1,116 9.0 3.4 1,552 59 20,054 –2,224 30,558 82.7Orangeburg . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40,358 40,709 –351 3,821 2,327 9.5 5.7 1,886 –52 27,095 –1,531 26,256 71.0Pickens . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59,016 57,617 1,399 3,679 1,721 6.2 3.0 2,228 44 31,005 –778 23,599 63.8Richland. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 177,782 161,769 16,013 10,325 5,196 5.8 3.2 9,268 77 174,849 –765 31,881 86.2

Saluda. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,607 9,389 218 598 336 6.2 3.6 224 –21 2,039 –2,156 19,795 53.5Spartanburg . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135,367 129,773 5,594 9,041 4,554 6.7 3.5 6,552 269 116,612 –5,340 34,135 92.3Sumter. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46,248 44,794 1,454 3,667 1,877 7.9 4.2 1,950 86 33,194 –3,826 26,217 70.9Union . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,584 14,137 –1,553 1,369 713 10.9 5.0 481 –58 6,553 –1,022 24,208 65.5Williamsburg . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,745 15,124 621 1,565 1,126 9.9 7.4 495 –43 6,533 –991 23,275 63.0York . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100,962 88,274 12,688 6,452 2,801 6.4 3.2 4,077 266 59,762 4,075 31,958 86.5

SOUTH DAKOTA . . . . . . . . . 430,992 408,685 22,307 13,892 11,007 3.2 2.7 324,787 31,004 3308,010 31,306 327,380 374.1

Aurora . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,337 1,581 –244 48 37 3.6 2.3 97 – 511 61 15,924 43.1Beadle. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,129 9,127 2 280 239 3.1 2.6 579 –18 5,723 –596 22,865 61.9Bennett . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,426 1,342 84 73 52 5.1 3.9 71 5 650 63 18,200 49.2Bon Homme . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,236 3,332 –96 133 92 4.1 2.8 191 –22 1,550 –166 20,790 56.2Brookings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18,796 17,566 1,230 474 397 2.5 2.3 809 71 11,790 57 33,880 91.6

Brown . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,864 20,506 358 564 503 2.7 2.5 1,289 –55 16,141 –559 25,949 70.2Brule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,895 2,727 168 83 70 2.9 2.6 220 1 1,749 –77 19,646 53.1Buffalo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 540 511 29 80 52 14.8 10.2 8 – 115 61 20,617 55.8Butte . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,258 4,784 474 150 141 2.9 2.9 298 19 1,811 –150 21,712 58.7Campbell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 871 927 –56 28 53 3.2 5.7 55 2 297 –16 18,168 49.1

Charles Mix . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,072 4,012 60 152 117 3.7 2.9 282 –5 2,578 35 19,659 53.2Clark . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,838 2,133 –295 76 82 4.1 3.8 113 –5 518 –174 19,736 53.4Clay . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,504 7,363 141 227 173 3.0 2.3 301 –1 2,816 –200 16,276 44.0Codington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,048 15,535 513 488 410 3.0 2.6 1,065 81 12,872 –101 24,831 67.2Corson. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,375 1,381 –6 89 84 6.5 6.1 50 4 190 –90 16,947 45.8

Custer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,739 4,167 572 148 132 3.1 3.2 242 21 1,016 –17 25,336 68.5Davison . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,917 10,358 559 334 251 3.1 2.4 755 12 10,535 –155 24,885 67.3Day. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,919 3,046 –127 154 131 5.3 4.3 203 –3 1,586 151 18,423 49.8Deuel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,666 2,515 151 100 83 3.8 3.3 136 – 1,254 340 29,223 79.1Dewey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,597 2,267 330 262 223 10.1 9.8 91 –10 720 –646 23,296 63.0

Douglas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,731 1,739 –8 49 39 2.8 2.2 117 –4 746 –158 20,672 55.9Edmunds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,101 2,141 –40 61 53 2.9 2.5 128 12 638 –83 23,141 62.6Fall River . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,759 3,533 226 137 141 3.6 4.0 234 26 2,183 –189 38,093 103.0Faulk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,173 1,283 –110 37 33 3.2 2.6 76 2 325 –7 19,160 51.8Grant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,196 4,152 44 154 136 3.7 3.3 278 17 3,050 82 25,847 69.9

Gregory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,408 2,435 –27 86 76 3.6 3.1 193 5 1,065 10 16,775 45.4Haakon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,182 1,264 –82 33 23 2.8 1.8 81 –9 577 –67 21,844 59.1Hamlin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,956 2,790 166 97 76 3.3 2.7 155 6 966 146 23,970 64.8Hand . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,921 2,043 –122 54 43 2.8 2.1 143 12 944 2 21,600 58.4Hanson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,992 1,594 398 59 36 3.0 2.3 55 2 183 –74 18,765 50.8

Harding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 771 765 6 23 22 3.0 2.9 33 –2 202 23 19,515 52.8Hughes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,109 9,619 490 266 205 2.6 2.1 676 41 6,356 124 23,140 62.6Hutchinson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,808 3,984 –176 135 104 3.5 2.6 242 –8 1,955 –340 20,415 55.2Hyde . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 768 853 –85 29 23 3.8 2.7 43 –2 567 14 21,437 58.0Jackson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,249 1,154 95 74 53 5.9 4.6 54 –1 263 –15 16,418 44.4

Jerauld . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,352 1,232 120 41 30 3.0 2.4 78 8 1,082 606 21,789 58.9Jones . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 711 757 –46 18 17 2.5 2.2 49 –7 274 –25 24,033 65.0Kingsbury. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,985 3,038 –53 101 80 3.4 2.6 198 –6 1,522 153 22,314 60.4Lake . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,700 6,551 149 212 170 3.2 2.6 359 7 3,650 6 23,561 63.7Lawrence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,877 11,548 1,329 377 350 2.9 3.0 899 79 8,919 386 22,078 59.7

Lincoln. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,523 14,502 5,021 494 268 2.5 1.8 786 180 7,387 2,180 31,222 84.5Lyman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,989 1,926 63 93 85 4.7 4.4 84 15 674 84 17,369 47.0McCook . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,999 2,985 14 94 71 3.1 2.4 183 5 1,134 –139 21,489 58.1McPherson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,191 1,327 –136 52 38 4.4 2.9 88 –5 359 –110 17,504 47.4Marshall . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,109 2,223 –114 95 85 4.5 3.8 145 1 1,158 –217 22,383 60.5





County





2004

2006 2000

Netchange,

2000–2006 2006 2000 2006 2000 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004

Amount(dol.)

Percentof

U.S.average

SOUTH DAKOTA—Con.

Meade . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,698 12,269 429 418 319 3.3 2.6 593 74 5,214 562 26,250 71.0Mellette . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 906 853 53 44 35 4.9 4.1 27 –3 184 23 14,402 39.0Miner. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,181 1,491 –310 47 41 4.0 2.7 68 –5 487 –324 21,193 57.3Minnehaha . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94,654 88,973 5,681 2,678 1,907 2.8 2.1 5,383 247 104,223 5,488 30,271 81.9Moody . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,987 3,720 267 169 149 4.2 4.0 134 –41 1,422 –92 26,504 71.7

Pennington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52,373 48,840 3,533 1,599 1,230 3.1 2.5 3,431 218 43,249 1,078 26,829 72.6Perkins . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,709 1,787 –78 54 47 3.2 2.6 121 –11 835 –174 19,193 51.9Potter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,339 1,459 –120 43 41 3.2 2.8 116 –18 779 –100 19,669 53.2Roberts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,803 4,612 191 217 189 4.5 4.1 251 – 2,179 240 18,709 50.6Sanborn. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,517 1,482 35 46 38 3.0 2.6 67 8 543 –185 19,245 52.1

Shannon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,789 2,841 948 337 268 8.9 9.4 71 17 2,001 545 23,771 64.3Spink. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,451 3,525 –74 116 115 3.4 3.3 168 –13 1,164 –139 20,637 55.8Stanley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,931 1,848 83 48 37 2.5 2.0 101 13 706 –118 26,622 72.0Sully . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,005 910 95 25 22 2.5 2.4 59 3 367 116 18,793 50.8Todd . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,391 2,955 436 201 147 5.9 5.0 51 –13 1,179 81 25,261 68.3

Tripp . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,051 3,302 –251 102 93 3.3 2.8 223 – 1,715 –50 19,929 53.9Turner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,556 4,785 –229 142 117 3.1 2.4 260 –14 1,530 –110 21,007 56.8Union . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,529 7,296 233 267 195 3.5 2.7 420 20 7,449 –5,513 45,275 122.5Walworth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,695 2,888 –193 114 102 4.2 3.5 231 –9 1,809 –158 20,695 56.0Yankton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,982 11,482 500 361 275 3.0 2.4 710 21 9,852 –224 25,221 68.2Ziebach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 867 753 114 56 63 6.5 8.4 19 2 160 –24 24,138 65.3

TENNESSEE . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,990,152 2,871,539 118,613 154,622 115,041 5.2 4.0 3131,691 3815 32,347,335 3–42,987 332,770 388.6

Anderson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35,527 34,058 1,469 1,670 1,445 4.7 4.2 1,650 –70 39,280 –284 42,756 115.7Bedford . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22,114 19,755 2,359 1,144 921 5.2 4.7 745 –7 13,145 –447 28,113 76.0Benton. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,923 7,385 –462 495 557 7.2 7.5 337 –2 3,268 –259 19,595 53.0Bledsoe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,798 5,144 –346 313 212 6.5 4.1 125 –11 760 –590 19,876 53.8Blount . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60,841 54,348 6,493 2,630 1,962 4.3 3.6 2,323 149 39,863 1,443 32,195 87.1

Bradley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47,652 45,671 1,981 2,380 1,655 5.0 3.6 1,912 41 37,663 –2,465 29,544 79.9Campbell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,737 16,188 549 1,024 996 6.1 6.2 612 –35 6,931 –823 24,120 65.2Cannon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,604 6,409 195 330 232 5.0 3.6 163 –5 1,469 117 22,619 61.2Carroll . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,906 14,349 –443 881 1,145 6.3 8.0 510 –21 6,668 –695 24,442 66.1Carter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29,290 27,844 1,446 1,473 1,360 5.0 4.9 737 –6 9,719 –272 22,068 59.7

Cheatham . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,930 19,660 1,270 842 555 4.0 2.8 532 8 6,039 –671 28,128 76.1Chester . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,684 7,679 5 416 319 5.4 4.2 261 17 3,004 –394 20,470 55.4Claiborne . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,293 12,693 600 721 646 5.4 5.1 454 –15 7,963 –160 23,596 63.8Clay . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,624 3,729 –105 395 248 10.9 6.7 121 3 1,292 –77 24,978 67.6Cocke . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,205 15,700 505 1,177 1,024 7.3 6.5 497 –14 6,391 –475 24,283 65.7

Coffee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25,478 23,702 1,776 1,392 964 5.5 4.1 1,229 36 21,260 –272 29,213 79.0Crockett . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,525 6,878 –353 448 329 6.9 4.8 269 –14 2,749 –415 26,008 70.4Cumberland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22,839 20,535 2,304 1,417 1,037 6.2 5.0 1,008 39 13,351 1,080 24,214 65.5Davidson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 312,344 311,521 823 12,999 10,014 4.2 3.2 18,235 –365 385,790 –12,757 36,618 99.1Decatur . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,538 5,719 –181 362 311 6.5 5.4 238 –19 3,009 –345 27,050 73.2

DeKalb . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,152 8,661 1,491 552 416 5.4 4.8 314 6 6,256 1,120 27,351 74.0Dickson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23,447 22,293 1,154 1,075 816 4.6 3.7 891 5 13,501 97 26,868 72.7Dyer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,489 18,145 –656 1,010 952 5.8 5.2 889 –62 14,508 –602 27,898 75.5Fayette . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,410 14,089 2,321 1,040 647 6.3 4.6 424 –22 4,800 588 28,298 76.5Fentress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,569 6,916 653 499 523 6.6 7.6 277 –9 3,053 –55 23,157 62.6

Franklin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,087 18,866 1,221 1,145 748 5.7 4.0 710 37 10,367 2,159 28,127 76.1Gibson. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21,066 23,404 –2,338 1,617 1,272 7.7 5.4 1,082 3 13,366 –3,062 26,266 71.1Giles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,471 15,009 –1,538 958 667 7.1 4.4 551 –23 7,622 –2,017 26,564 71.9Grainger. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,356 9,760 596 604 450 5.8 4.6 237 –9 2,199 –711 22,695 61.4Greene . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32,822 31,868 954 2,557 1,893 7.8 5.9 1,185 –13 22,674 –363 26,902 72.8

Grundy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,866 5,706 160 472 288 8.0 5.0 201 13 1,685 178 18,846 51.0Hamblen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30,324 29,758 566 1,731 1,212 5.7 4.1 1,397 –7 29,405 –2,982 29,732 80.4Hamilton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161,562 160,657 905 7,171 5,403 4.4 3.4 8,785 –61 172,616 –2,154 31,539 85.3Hancock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,470 2,672 –202 174 139 7.0 5.2 56 –8 494 –127 17,854 48.3Hardeman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,376 11,118 258 819 582 7.2 5.2 391 –31 6,125 –428 24,664 66.7

Hardin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,691 11,728 –37 720 640 6.2 5.5 511 –10 6,015 –397 26,152 70.7Hawkins. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26,030 24,690 1,340 1,503 1,058 5.8 4.3 586 –44 11,154 –941 27,337 73.9Haywood . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,588 9,349 239 736 534 7.7 5.7 342 –39 5,046 507 24,093 65.2Henderson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,488 12,931 –443 820 654 6.6 5.1 504 –25 8,428 361 24,059 65.1Henry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,095 14,880 –785 1,009 742 7.2 5.0 734 –13 9,088 –1,184 26,082 70.6

Hickman. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,415 9,866 549 555 412 5.3 4.2 305 –2 2,473 135 21,283 57.6Houston . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,820 3,706 114 287 222 7.5 6.0 118 8 984 –107 21,908 59.3Humphreys. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,981 8,957 24 568 457 6.3 5.1 346 26 4,468 –207 31,348 84.8Jackson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,178 5,106 72 345 327 6.7 6.4 112 3 1,688 85 20,992 56.8Jefferson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24,207 22,593 1,614 1,368 987 5.7 4.4 669 20 10,637 1 25,244 68.3

Johnson. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,238 6,976 262 482 475 6.7 6.8 241 –4 2,686 28 24,692 66.8Knox . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 220,537 202,414 18,123 8,622 6,381 3.9 3.2 11,166 –8 198,854 11,656 31,477 85.1Lake . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,677 2,568 109 187 163 7.0 6.3 92 –2 636 –46 20,426 55.3Lauderdale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,902 11,293 –1,391 796 591 8.0 5.2 338 –51 5,607 –1,049 25,348 68.6Lawrence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,899 19,150 –2,251 1,909 1,816 11.3 9.5 755 –45 10,920 –931 23,435 63.4





County





2004

2006 2000

Netchange,

2000–2006 2006 2000 2006 2000 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004

Amount(dol.)

Percentof

U.S.average

TENNESSEE—Con.

Lewis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,244 5,311 –67 375 297 7.2 5.6 192 –23 1,840 –199 20,460 55.3Lincoln. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,047 15,892 1,155 716 577 4.2 3.6 625 –12 6,542 –740 25,364 68.6Loudon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22,351 19,614 2,737 987 711 4.4 3.6 826 83 11,256 894 27,229 73.7McMinn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24,822 23,724 1,098 1,396 1,091 5.6 4.6 909 –30 14,707 –2,482 31,938 86.4McNairy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,240 11,825 415 745 534 6.1 4.5 459 6 6,612 –2,597 24,168 65.4

Macon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,976 10,267 709 741 392 6.8 3.8 333 25 3,493 –582 23,776 64.3Madison. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47,520 47,028 492 2,560 1,769 5.4 3.8 2,586 –35 51,977 –1,276 30,710 83.1Marion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,098 13,144 –46 750 601 5.7 4.6 442 8 5,341 –54 24,801 67.1Marshall . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,649 14,063 –1,414 795 513 6.3 3.6 501 2 8,582 –2,928 25,458 68.9Maury . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36,422 37,051 –629 1,971 1,342 5.4 3.6 1,570 70 28,886 –1,126 37,988 102.8

Meigs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,841 4,909 –68 331 258 6.8 5.3 95 1 1,367 –69 26,949 72.9Monroe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,408 17,528 1,880 1,110 962 5.7 5.5 710 53 11,382 –656 27,085 73.3Montgomery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67,439 59,818 7,621 3,231 2,298 4.8 3.8 2,349 106 35,815 2,304 25,405 68.7Moore . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,125 2,934 191 147 93 4.7 3.2 51 –7 798 53 35,754 96.7Morgan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,406 8,067 339 553 421 6.6 5.2 159 –9 1,610 –250 25,704 69.5

Obion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,622 16,392 –770 877 717 5.6 4.4 724 –29 13,303 –1,685 31,468 85.1Overton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,036 9,682 354 665 529 6.6 5.5 280 –21 3,475 –102 24,156 65.3Perry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,350 3,514 –164 219 187 6.5 5.3 107 –6 1,763 –1,022 31,775 86.0Pickett . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,868 2,286 –418 159 119 8.5 5.2 97 19 764 –314 23,681 64.1Polk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,432 7,540 –108 414 344 5.6 4.6 253 –7 1,762 –272 23,077 62.4

Putnam . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34,818 32,015 2,803 1,980 1,433 5.7 4.5 1,715 –1 27,317 –912 25,114 67.9Rhea . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,403 13,420 –17 824 641 6.1 4.8 518 31 9,111 578 26,429 71.5Roane . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26,627 24,900 1,727 1,431 1,086 5.4 4.4 728 16 9,625 1,236 23,077 62.4Robertson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32,535 29,796 2,739 1,441 1,076 4.4 3.6 923 –41 13,735 –163 26,360 71.3Rutherford . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122,092 103,339 18,753 4,921 3,225 4.0 3.1 3,905 455 76,992 5,298 36,033 97.5

Scott . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,620 8,696 –76 585 464 6.8 5.3 353 7 5,340 –690 27,263 73.7Sequatchie . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,921 5,369 552 271 211 4.6 3.9 192 24 2,378 –22 23,513 63.6Sevier . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47,011 39,837 7,174 2,536 2,009 5.4 5.0 2,678 155 30,723 3,084 22,299 60.3Shelby . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 440,771 442,438 –1,667 25,150 17,437 5.7 3.9 20,787 –556 441,324 –35,975 37,597 101.7Smith. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,361 8,969 392 533 395 5.7 4.4 303 –3 4,705 –220 26,698 72.2

Stewart . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,105 5,544 561 474 274 7.8 4.9 167 21 1,840 675 28,370 76.7Sullivan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73,221 73,338 –117 3,328 2,772 4.5 3.8 3,553 –90 62,132 –2,254 34,072 92.2Sumner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77,837 70,941 6,896 3,228 2,336 4.1 3.3 2,839 294 39,260 4,183 29,220 79.0Tipton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27,074 25,307 1,767 1,516 955 5.6 3.8 740 4 8,959 –750 25,727 69.6Trousdale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,786 3,577 209 227 125 6.0 3.5 116 –4 1,005 –228 20,144 54.5

Unicoi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,362 8,351 11 518 581 6.2 7.0 272 13 4,245 512 32,675 88.4Union . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,948 8,128 820 429 319 4.8 3.9 197 8 1,793 –268 21,807 59.0Van Buren . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,472 2,679 –207 198 127 8.0 4.7 44 –6 740 85 32,188 87.1Warren . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18,031 19,571 –1,540 1,626 821 9.0 4.2 764 –12 12,094 –1,745 30,463 82.4Washington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59,070 55,363 3,707 2,675 2,248 4.5 4.1 2,803 55 49,915 –1,734 27,170 73.5

Wayne . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,539 6,757 –218 682 567 10.4 8.4 239 –8 2,784 –105 21,232 57.4Weakley. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,742 16,934 –1,192 1,063 859 6.8 5.1 604 –43 8,262 –1,671 21,764 58.9White. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,747 11,017 –270 971 517 9.0 4.7 399 –7 6,076 –753 26,696 72.2Williamson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83,899 70,444 13,455 2,943 1,795 3.5 2.5 4,956 594 78,154 8,242 40,891 110.6Wilson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56,210 50,132 6,078 2,494 1,617 4.4 3.2 2,303 260 33,162 6,581 31,967 86.5

TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,487,496 10,347,847 1,139,649 565,823 451,845 4.9 4.4 3491,092 319,583 38,118,483 392,045 336,161 397.8

Anderson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,596 19,580 1,016 1,225 1,200 5.9 6.1 937 –13 11,824 1,289 25,882 70.0Andrews. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,022 5,612 1,410 245 276 3.5 4.9 283 2 2,890 81 29,121 78.8Angelina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40,735 37,872 2,863 1,914 1,815 4.7 4.8 1,816 11 29,489 –482 26,173 70.8Aransas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,178 9,713 1,465 537 578 4.8 6.0 490 13 3,619 27 21,017 56.9Archer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,416 4,855 561 187 154 3.5 3.2 147 –4 867 152 28,534 77.2

Armstrong . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,154 1,086 68 41 34 3.6 3.1 37 5 308 (NA) 25,016 67.7Atascosa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,693 17,190 2,503 917 710 4.7 4.1 605 60 5,994 78 22,391 60.6Austin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,355 11,989 1,366 566 478 4.2 4.0 585 37 7,006 1,207 28,952 78.3Bailey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,154 3,184 –30 165 145 5.2 4.6 167 –10 1,502 53 20,469 55.4Bandera. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,048 8,685 1,363 427 317 4.2 3.6 383 62 1,829 168 20,330 55.0

Bastrop . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35,021 29,667 5,354 1,603 1,032 4.6 3.5 895 105 8,385 1,141 23,195 62.7Baylor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,921 1,839 82 82 81 4.3 4.4 137 2 1,220 –81 14,609 39.5Bee. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,580 11,304 276 746 677 6.4 6.0 447 –2 4,075 –317 23,616 63.9Bell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116,223 101,226 14,997 5,911 4,325 5.1 4.3 4,352 279 79,363 4,086 28,608 77.4Bexar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 741,154 660,867 80,287 34,792 26,902 4.7 4.1 30,690 891 582,905 11,005 31,776 86.0

Blanco . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,680 4,459 221 186 137 4.0 3.1 229 6 1,688 –502 29,911 80.9Borden . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 421 421 – 18 27 4.3 6.4 2 –1 610 (NA) (NA) (NA)Bosque . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,270 8,030 240 415 322 5.0 4.0 314 –1 2,717 76 24,974 67.6Bowie . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43,101 40,379 2,722 2,336 1,990 5.4 4.9 2,137 6 31,365 –782 26,272 71.1Brazoria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138,590 119,857 18,733 6,817 5,998 4.9 5.0 4,141 304 64,800 3,924 34,428 93.1

Brazos. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88,190 78,537 9,653 3,563 2,961 4.0 3.8 3,463 247 51,298 3,923 25,042 67.7Brewster . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,626 4,545 1,081 191 175 3.4 3.9 313 25 2,406 225 18,736 50.7Briscoe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 694 907 –213 35 32 5.0 3.5 36 –17 131 –76 18,092 48.9Brooks. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,069 2,880 189 194 194 6.3 6.7 144 6 1,766 502 13,994 37.9Brown . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,407 17,615 1,792 877 774 4.5 4.4 892 –6 12,398 304 25,071 67.8





County





2004

2006 2000

Netchange,

2000–2006 2006 2000 2006 2000 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004

Amount(dol.)

Percentof

U.S.average

TEXAS—Con.

Burleson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,773 7,708 1,065 358 314 4.1 4.1 293 14 2,314 23 22,149 59.9Burnet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21,638 17,126 4,512 890 586 4.1 3.4 930 20 8,144 1,072 25,235 68.3Caldwell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,620 15,075 1,545 808 629 4.9 4.2 489 –5 4,519 293 21,734 58.8Calhoun . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,557 9,326 231 473 436 4.9 4.7 404 –7 6,882 –1,173 43,351 117.3Callahan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,169 6,195 974 287 238 4.0 3.8 201 3 1,145 147 21,668 58.6

Cameron . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144,709 126,967 17,742 9,594 8,888 6.6 7.0 6,168 372 90,929 4,432 20,497 55.4Camp . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,556 5,202 354 285 266 5.1 5.1 247 –9 4,333 1,274 28,977 78.4Carson. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,587 3,345 242 128 109 3.6 3.3 112 –15 3,884 3,046 58,618 158.6Cass . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,172 13,493 –321 795 781 6.0 5.8 574 3 5,345 104 19,834 53.7Castro . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,202 3,981 –779 159 146 5.0 3.7 185 –17 1,070 –372 24,689 66.8

Chambers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,475 13,083 1,392 737 564 5.1 4.3 408 32 4,456 –1,920 35,216 95.3Cherokee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,637 20,864 –227 1,118 955 5.4 4.6 764 –58 11,830 –1,239 22,475 60.8Childress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,004 2,973 31 174 138 5.8 4.6 163 –5 1,444 212 20,289 54.9Clay . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,638 5,938 700 256 210 3.9 3.5 139 11 1,103 98 23,586 63.8Cochran. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,441 1,585 –144 92 92 6.4 5.8 64 –3 435 6 25,384 68.7

Coke . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,369 1,655 –286 78 67 5.7 4.0 65 –12 555 –109 26,580 71.9Coleman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,232 4,200 32 187 194 4.4 4.6 205 –6 1,473 29 18,944 51.2Collin. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 381,670 299,234 82,436 16,300 8,562 4.3 2.9 14,297 3,216 228,523 45,199 43,034 116.4Collingsworth . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,599 1,526 73 70 54 4.4 3.5 71 – 595 145 20,030 54.2Colorado . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,804 9,890 914 476 363 4.4 3.7 533 –22 5,009 –533 25,124 68.0

Comal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50,703 40,308 10,395 2,098 1,420 4.1 3.5 2,352 302 30,386 5,407 27,629 74.7Comanche . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,430 6,657 –227 296 251 4.6 3.8 299 –11 2,508 –209 21,391 57.9Concho . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,341 1,433 –92 77 81 5.7 5.7 54 –4 591 19 26,198 70.9Cooke . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,966 18,609 2,357 814 670 3.9 3.6 839 –7 11,027 –863 25,039 67.7Coryell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25,895 23,925 1,970 1,682 1,304 6.5 5.5 703 –22 8,372 817 20,620 55.8

Cottle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 791 946 –155 43 39 5.4 4.1 42 –5 219 –89 16,406 44.4Crane . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,739 1,609 130 79 87 4.5 5.4 72 –13 825 –118 31,982 86.5Crockett . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,056 2,039 17 74 77 3.6 3.8 122 –1 782 –186 23,824 64.4Crosby. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,992 2,974 18 163 137 5.4 4.6 115 –12 969 45 26,305 71.2Culberson. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,683 1,489 194 54 85 3.2 5.7 59 –3 526 –61 17,110 46.3

Dallam. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,995 3,277 –282 105 110 3.5 3.4 240 10 1,852 103 22,768 61.6Dallas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,184,476 1,184,898 –422 60,317 46,625 5.1 3.9 62,601 –1,206 1,314,123 –163,993 44,686 120.9Dawson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,091 5,831 –740 347 306 6.8 5.2 316 –38 2,366 –181 21,587 58.4Deaf Smith . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,273 8,224 49 362 396 4.4 4.8 419 –28 3,932 –474 25,649 69.4Delta . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,505 2,564 –59 128 132 5.1 5.1 65 –7 576 105 12,063 32.6

Denton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 326,387 267,029 59,358 13,821 7,613 4.2 2.9 9,388 1,366 132,913 22,298 31,938 86.4DeWitt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,617 8,951 666 427 374 4.4 4.2 411 46 4,152 464 22,724 61.5Dickens . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,216 1,132 84 54 58 4.4 5.1 48 –6 348 –33 25,618 69.3Dimmit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,843 3,853 –10 300 335 7.8 8.7 167 –15 1,459 18 21,508 58.2Donley. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,837 1,861 –24 89 74 4.8 4.0 85 –9 381 –23 16,525 44.7

Duval. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,511 5,001 510 298 351 5.4 7.0 136 –15 1,262 151 26,052 70.5Eastland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,640 8,555 85 420 396 4.9 4.6 485 26 4,795 –184 23,675 64.0Ector . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66,467 56,487 9,980 2,583 3,058 3.9 5.4 3,129 118 42,590 3,965 29,832 80.7Edwards. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 960 952 8 43 41 4.5 4.3 43 6 190 47 18,253 49.4Ellis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68,919 60,047 8,872 3,460 2,172 5.0 3.6 2,238 190 30,654 2,172 30,292 81.9

El Paso . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 295,141 274,826 20,315 19,911 18,716 6.7 6.8 12,556 246 199,563 –318 24,863 67.3Erath . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,777 16,545 1,232 727 598 4.1 3.6 831 –2 10,877 1,298 22,159 59.9Falls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,178 7,173 5 455 381 6.3 5.3 261 –16 1,947 –534 20,049 54.2Fannin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,710 13,899 –189 833 661 6.1 4.8 503 12 4,937 –827 27,037 73.1Fayette . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,102 11,387 715 458 370 3.8 3.2 746 9 6,353 224 24,380 66.0

Fisher . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,963 2,148 –185 83 79 4.2 3.7 75 –12 779 81 22,751 61.5Floyd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,154 3,466 –312 193 164 6.1 4.7 182 –2 1,192 –87 19,348 52.3Foard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 675 790 –115 30 28 4.4 3.5 33 –7 193 –136 14,767 39.9Fort Bend. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 244,666 185,224 59,442 11,532 6,670 4.7 3.6 7,105 1,097 90,649 12,001 36,512 98.8Franklin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,451 4,417 1,034 234 182 4.3 4.1 168 –21 5,544 –147 13,102 35.4

Freestone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,469 7,874 2,595 415 395 4.0 5.0 358 15 3,432 267 29,683 80.3Frio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,503 6,156 347 366 379 5.6 6.2 250 –18 2,164 35 20,446 55.3Gaines. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,135 6,231 –96 287 270 4.7 4.3 307 –6 2,507 122 24,043 65.0Galveston. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143,120 127,783 15,337 7,193 6,318 5.0 4.9 4,940 139 69,101 –57 29,070 78.6Garza . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,550 2,116 434 106 92 4.2 4.3 121 2 1,011 –11 23,948 64.8

Gillespie. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,920 10,481 2,439 432 381 3.3 3.6 898 87 6,885 652 23,988 64.9Glasscock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 581 726 –145 27 22 4.6 3.0 15 –5 86 –46 28,977 78.4Goliad . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,480 3,326 154 143 126 4.1 3.8 115 3 853 141 27,783 75.2Gonzales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,847 9,082 765 411 308 4.2 3.4 400 5 4,329 327 24,508 66.3Gray . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,991 9,955 1,036 437 492 4.0 4.9 652 –22 5,884 –307 28,780 77.9

Grayson. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57,451 56,210 1,241 2,810 2,240 4.9 4.0 2,645 65 36,644 –2,875 29,284 79.2Gregg . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61,958 55,089 6,869 2,852 2,979 4.6 5.4 3,955 87 62,031 4,557 29,324 79.3Grimes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,622 9,939 683 578 531 5.4 5.3 357 12 4,153 –913 31,474 85.1Guadalupe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53,759 45,260 8,499 2,353 1,545 4.4 3.4 1,627 268 23,903 4,785 27,180 73.5Hale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,693 16,909 –216 891 759 5.3 4.5 800 –24 11,792 47 24,339 65.8





County





2004

2006 2000

Netchange,

2000–2006 2006 2000 2006 2000 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004

Amount(dol.)

Percentof

U.S.average

TEXAS—Con.

Hall . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,504 1,712 –208 92 88 6.1 5.1 85 –6 453 –326 17,166 46.4Hamilton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,065 4,031 34 172 143 4.2 3.5 213 –1 1,760 –62 23,786 64.3Hansford . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,395 2,818 –423 90 82 3.8 2.9 160 –19 1,025 –117 25,764 69.7Hardeman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,396 2,445 –49 99 86 4.1 3.5 91 –11 855 46 23,823 64.4Hardin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25,294 23,149 2,145 1,371 1,290 5.4 5.6 742 5 8,672 –141 24,560 66.4

Harris . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,895,870 1,722,146 173,724 95,192 75,183 5.0 4.4 86,566 1,774 1,644,612 3,574 43,477 117.6Harrison. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31,651 29,331 2,320 1,648 1,452 5.2 5.0 1,115 –72 16,054 212 24,788 67.1Hartley. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,216 2,424 –208 92 77 4.2 3.2 67 –17 790 18 19,290 52.2Haskell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,070 2,888 182 122 117 4.0 4.1 141 –6 785 –132 18,468 50.0Hays . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69,865 56,579 13,286 2,926 1,852 4.2 3.3 2,574 388 29,840 5,800 25,533 69.1

Hemphill. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,291 1,837 454 65 52 2.8 2.8 144 4 984 57 27,369 74.0Henderson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34,964 32,766 2,198 1,836 1,342 5.3 4.1 1,241 49 13,062 32 22,431 60.7Hidalgo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 269,586 210,954 58,632 19,837 19,412 7.4 9.2 9,338 1,018 140,725 25,870 21,757 58.9Hill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,357 15,182 175 865 676 5.6 4.5 680 –13 6,874 –530 20,961 56.7Hockley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,402 10,886 516 493 441 4.3 4.1 475 –14 5,247 173 24,677 66.8

Hood . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23,105 20,242 2,863 1,146 781 5.0 3.9 1,025 84 8,784 529 23,430 63.4Hopkins . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,780 16,341 1,439 754 649 4.2 4.0 730 –4 9,746 697 23,594 63.8Houston . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,328 9,044 –716 514 455 6.2 5.0 363 –45 3,652 294 25,243 68.3Howard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,738 13,566 172 692 690 5.0 5.1 715 –38 9,434 –505 27,076 73.2Hudspeth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,362 1,315 47 101 60 7.4 4.6 42 3 201 –20 27,975 75.7

Hunt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40,036 38,815 1,221 2,060 1,665 5.1 4.3 1,351 61 24,623 4,123 33,025 89.3Hutchinson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,817 10,987 –170 502 522 4.6 4.8 499 –17 6,258 –296 34,932 94.5Irion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 980 941 39 35 30 3.6 3.2 46 4 249 –5 36,622 99.1Jack . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,345 3,782 563 188 158 4.3 4.2 181 5 1,817 469 26,026 70.4Jackson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,573 6,788 –215 307 247 4.7 3.6 260 –21 3,893 –343 27,186 73.5

Jasper . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,781 15,315 466 1,014 1,096 6.4 7.2 672 –35 8,964 203 25,300 68.4Jeff Davis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,202 1,160 42 49 43 4.1 3.7 56 2 401 –31 18,928 51.2Jefferson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114,074 112,578 1,496 7,050 7,328 6.2 6.5 5,816 –93 101,800 1,398 32,849 88.9Jim Hogg . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,721 2,177 544 121 130 4.4 6.0 95 –11 979 185 17,053 46.1Jim Wells . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,567 16,642 3,925 985 993 4.8 6.0 787 –12 10,846 1,157 25,700 69.5

Johnson. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74,278 66,317 7,961 3,424 2,533 4.6 3.8 2,304 128 28,088 1,521 25,111 67.9Jones . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,080 7,664 416 441 392 5.5 5.1 320 2 2,698 –451 22,303 60.3Karnes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,452 5,367 85 339 286 6.2 5.3 253 –19 2,098 86 22,321 60.4Kaufman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44,633 37,543 7,090 2,244 1,540 5.0 4.1 1,566 103 18,273 –2,041 27,894 75.5Kendall . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,869 12,073 2,796 586 405 3.9 3.4 906 180 7,732 1,533 28,758 77.8

Kenedy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 252 206 46 7 7 2.8 3.4 6 3 19 (NA) 20,947 56.7Kent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 394 442 –48 18 16 4.6 3.6 14 –5 7175 (NA) (NA) (NA)Kerr. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22,893 19,176 3,717 942 682 4.1 3.6 1,400 73 14,905 589 27,072 73.2Kimble . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,246 2,249 –3 89 75 4.0 3.3 144 5 1,359 206 22,278 60.3King . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 160 211 –51 8 7 5.0 3.3 1 – 610 (NA) (NA) (NA)

Kinney . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,311 1,203 108 79 87 6.0 7.2 39 7 225 14 19,520 52.8Kleberg . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,445 13,864 2,581 767 704 4.7 5.1 571 21 6,245 891 22,700 61.4Knox . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,789 1,851 –62 76 83 4.2 4.5 124 1 853 140 21,232 57.4Lamar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23,889 22,997 892 1,312 1,117 5.5 4.9 1,223 40 17,376 595 25,517 69.0Lamb. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,165 6,896 269 342 335 4.8 4.9 296 –18 2,653 –254 27,499 74.4

Lampasas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,082 8,623 1,459 421 335 4.2 3.9 391 20 4,634 1,062 16,913 45.8La Salle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,730 2,198 532 144 156 5.3 7.1 85 –1 912 95 29,781 80.6Lavaca . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,430 9,566 864 388 282 3.7 2.9 459 –43 6,231 –356 20,050 54.2Lee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,887 8,205 682 362 286 4.1 3.5 408 16 3,726 201 27,296 73.8Leon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,825 7,004 821 395 349 5.0 5.0 342 22 3,843 209 35,415 95.8

Liberty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32,345 30,195 2,150 1,817 1,800 5.6 6.0 1,049 9 11,445 –223 23,022 62.3Limestone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,386 9,545 841 501 445 4.8 4.7 396 –3 4,751 299 23,041 62.3Lipscomb . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,702 1,480 222 60 49 3.5 3.3 105 7 610 186 26,095 70.6Live Oak . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,036 4,836 200 241 215 4.8 4.4 246 44 1,790 130 43,078 116.5Llano. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,291 7,326 965 394 283 4.8 3.9 461 15 3,164 –291 24,302 65.7

Loving . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 49 –12 4 4 10.8 8.2 1 – 610 (NA) (NA) (NA)Lubbock. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140,349 127,818 12,531 5,596 4,572 4.0 3.6 6,634 135 99,448 5,931 25,988 70.3Lynn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,783 2,985 –202 158 121 5.7 4.1 97 –10 660 –123 27,379 74.1McCulloch . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,758 3,680 78 172 190 4.6 5.2 220 –2 1,801 –357 21,166 57.3McLennan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113,340 103,603 9,737 5,484 4,279 4.8 4.1 4,946 106 88,313 –2,350 27,233 73.7

McMullen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 336 397 –61 20 15 6.0 3.8 14 – 58 –5 28,845 78.0Madison. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,003 4,836 167 267 234 5.3 4.8 204 –3 1,741 –134 21,733 58.8Marion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,056 4,635 421 275 290 5.4 6.3 180 –8 1,183 34 22,086 59.7Martin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,144 2,130 14 92 84 4.3 3.9 90 1 656 99 23,591 63.8Mason . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,465 2,013 452 76 55 3.1 2.7 136 16 683 148 16,914 45.8

Matagorda . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,079 17,268 –1,189 1,160 1,149 7.2 6.7 786 8 7,441 –446 32,647 88.3Maverick . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,747 16,484 3,263 2,563 2,484 13.0 15.1 804 –33 8,013 148 19,301 52.2Medina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,172 17,929 2,243 926 713 4.6 4.0 608 34 5,252 345 20,666 55.9Menard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,069 1,166 –97 46 40 4.3 3.4 47 – 247 –42 15,887 43.0Midland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70,525 58,115 12,410 2,384 2,441 3.4 4.2 4,026 –12 49,858 3,858 32,841 88.8





County





2004

2006 2000

Netchange,

2000–2006 2006 2000 2006 2000 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004

Amount(dol.)

Percentof

U.S.average

TEXAS—Con.

Milam . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,129 11,565 564 578 424 4.8 3.7 433 1 4,930 –546 31,939 86.4Mills . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,472 2,451 21 103 82 4.2 3.3 127 – 967 107 20,456 55.3Mitchell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,373 3,423 –50 208 188 6.2 5.5 135 –7 1,088 –175 23,079 62.4Montague. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,129 9,207 922 421 427 4.2 4.6 452 20 3,213 –82 22,786 61.6Montgomery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197,136 152,424 44,712 8,577 5,625 4.4 3.7 7,236 1,435 98,965 13,425 38,094 103.0

Moore . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,510 9,676 834 364 319 3.5 3.3 413 –25 6,939 30 30,818 83.4Morris . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,249 5,929 320 342 373 5.5 6.3 230 –38 4,082 14 34,330 92.9Motley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 637 701 –64 27 23 4.2 3.3 42 –6 203 25 18,493 50.0Nacogdoches . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31,298 29,023 2,275 1,499 1,268 4.8 4.4 1,250 –67 18,212 404 23,342 63.1Navarro . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21,478 21,053 425 1,196 1,038 5.6 4.9 897 –36 13,777 256 23,316 63.1

Newton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,738 6,094 –356 423 484 7.4 7.9 139 –12 1,159 –465 18,142 49.1Nolan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,666 7,321 345 341 349 4.4 4.8 369 –13 4,372 –349 24,917 67.4Nueces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159,964 147,724 12,240 7,895 7,792 4.9 5.3 7,972 99 116,907 116 29,678 80.3Ochiltree . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,164 4,762 402 159 148 3.1 3.1 312 5 2,622 130 27,552 74.5Oldham . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,037 1,151 –114 43 37 4.1 3.2 38 –9 345 –215 19,446 52.6

Orange . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41,517 40,581 936 2,478 2,812 6.0 6.9 1,398 –63 18,559 –1,373 30,223 81.8Palo Pinto . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,837 13,309 1,528 634 542 4.3 4.1 622 4 6,364 –427 24,495 66.3Panola. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,202 10,371 1,831 538 577 4.4 5.6 467 14 5,063 –432 27,434 74.2Parker . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52,279 46,237 6,042 2,409 1,668 4.6 3.6 1,840 287 17,586 1,928 23,922 64.7Parmer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,376 4,484 –108 176 150 4.0 3.3 197 –9 3,395 –42 25,117 67.9

Pecos . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,694 6,985 –291 324 356 4.8 5.1 298 –16 3,192 223 22,775 61.6Polk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,049 15,837 1,212 1,063 911 6.2 5.8 676 –19 7,432 128 23,704 64.1Potter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58,171 52,876 5,295 2,505 2,842 4.3 5.4 3,567 –65 62,194 205 28,219 76.3Presidio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,275 3,182 93 349 529 10.7 16.6 120 – 605 –29 16,258 44.0Rains. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,212 4,348 864 254 166 4.9 3.8 145 6 1,069 165 17,679 47.8

Randall . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67,368 60,171 7,197 2,251 1,507 3.3 2.5 2,084 93 22,197 763 25,981 70.3Reagan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,337 1,622 715 58 57 2.5 3.5 99 5 687 –111 30,655 82.9Real . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,301 1,384 –83 67 59 5.1 4.3 63 –5 372 –55 18,672 50.5Red River. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,346 6,762 –416 356 321 5.6 4.7 211 –13 1,990 –600 20,613 55.8Reeves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,149 5,033 –884 267 444 6.4 8.8 189 –25 2,286 –599 18,902 51.1

Refugio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,827 3,682 145 182 154 4.8 4.2 150 –6 1,279 122 24,499 66.3Roberts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 561 511 50 18 12 3.2 2.3 11 –2 860 (NA) (NA) (NA)Robertson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,693 6,955 738 374 328 4.9 4.7 238 13 2,070 –33 29,717 80.4Rockwall . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33,691 24,260 9,431 1,514 737 4.5 3.0 1,299 258 13,886 2,952 27,765 75.1Runnels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,465 5,266 –801 248 242 5.6 4.6 263 – 3,066 174 22,359 60.5

Rusk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23,205 21,026 2,179 1,100 1,033 4.7 4.9 723 –59 9,014 –503 29,360 79.4Sabine. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,474 3,754 –280 307 309 8.8 8.2 143 –18 1,792 186 20,748 56.1San Augustine. . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,591 3,733 –142 234 190 6.5 5.1 134 –6 1,198 –16 20,987 56.8San Jacinto . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,578 9,380 1,198 600 446 5.7 4.8 164 19 1,105 62 18,310 49.5San Patricio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29,933 27,416 2,517 1,664 1,620 5.6 5.9 1,031 19 12,441 119 25,892 70.0

San Saba. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,559 2,795 –236 132 113 5.2 4.0 158 –8 1,055 –254 16,771 45.4Schleicher . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,376 1,503 –127 54 55 3.9 3.7 61 –9 622 21 25,561 69.1Scurry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,216 7,212 4 347 344 4.8 4.8 389 –21 4,189 –118 27,931 75.6Shackelford . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,007 1,640 367 63 55 3.1 3.4 110 5 694 152 25,048 67.8Shelby . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,151 11,323 828 607 581 5.0 5.1 452 –68 5,749 –43 23,423 63.4

Sherman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,317 1,622 –305 55 43 4.2 2.7 59 –13 278 –332 27,183 73.5Smith. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97,622 86,196 11,426 4,576 3,767 4.7 4.4 5,165 304 80,762 6,864 31,905 86.3Somervell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,770 3,452 318 184 140 4.9 4.1 183 33 3,057 –48 43,053 116.5Starr . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21,758 17,725 4,033 2,539 2,983 11.7 16.8 440 43 6,668 1,704 15,018 40.6Stephens . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,466 4,361 105 187 184 4.2 4.2 267 –1 1,888 –342 24,339 65.8

Sterling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 851 726 125 28 23 3.3 3.2 33 2 220 57 23,086 62.5Stonewall . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 896 818 78 30 34 3.3 4.2 48 –8 327 –56 25,581 69.2Sutton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,852 2,151 701 79 83 2.8 3.9 142 –3 1,264 219 28,732 77.7Swisher . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,542 3,873 –331 164 153 4.6 4.0 152 –25 1,244 71 20,183 54.6Tarrant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 868,728 792,811 75,917 41,261 28,602 4.7 3.6 35,314 1,946 639,842 –1,085 36,973 100.0

Taylor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66,832 61,244 5,588 2,661 2,487 4.0 4.1 3,363 –138 51,584 2,427 23,855 64.5Terrell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 381 512 –131 23 20 6.0 3.9 19 –2 86 (NA) 23,605 63.9Terry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,669 5,593 76 301 272 5.3 4.9 246 6 1,978 –122 23,846 64.5Throckmorton . . . . . . . . . . . . . 941 972 –31 35 32 3.7 3.3 56 – 289 –52 18,758 50.7Titus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,674 12,734 1,940 635 558 4.3 4.4 689 13 12,994 851 24,247 65.6

Tom Green . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53,011 50,598 2,413 2,241 1,971 4.2 3.9 2,569 –23 36,517 1,745 26,517 71.7Travis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 522,790 490,786 32,004 21,150 15,110 4.0 3.1 25,048 1,500 416,610 –29,479 40,329 109.1Trinity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,788 5,738 50 347 295 6.0 5.1 204 –9 1,747 38 19,355 52.4Tyler . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,300 7,902 398 538 525 6.5 6.6 262 –31 2,300 –1,681 19,062 51.6Upshur. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,204 16,468 2,736 894 800 4.7 4.9 453 24 4,139 189 22,106 59.8

Upton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,618 1,506 112 61 72 3.8 4.8 65 –1 588 –153 29,930 81.0Uvalde. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,762 11,358 404 697 646 5.9 5.7 577 –8 6,388 198 21,854 59.1Val Verde . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,205 17,307 2,898 1,241 1,091 6.1 6.3 814 9 10,688 1,740 19,539 52.9Van Zandt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25,690 22,519 3,171 1,183 871 4.6 3.9 787 44 8,680 1,744 22,315 60.4Victoria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45,103 43,026 2,077 1,859 1,600 4.1 3.7 2,225 18 29,440 –55 27,748 75.1





County





2004

2006 2000

Netchange,

2000–2006 2006 2000 2006 2000 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004

Amount(dol.)

Percentof

U.S.average

TEXAS—Con.

Walker . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26,348 25,095 1,253 1,444 1,195 5.5 4.8 882 34 10,524 –180 20,452 55.3Waller . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,520 15,298 1,222 857 685 5.2 4.5 960 439 11,970 4,615 30,221 81.8Ward . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,771 4,442 329 228 277 4.8 6.2 249 12 2,129 48 27,734 75.0Washington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,177 15,038 1,139 697 543 4.3 3.6 813 33 11,796 1,003 24,324 65.8Webb . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89,117 70,847 18,270 4,840 4,367 5.4 6.2 4,495 415 61,975 8,759 21,571 58.4

Wharton. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,790 20,141 649 1,015 859 4.9 4.3 962 7 12,372 1,198 23,312 63.1Wheeler . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,708 2,696 12 96 102 3.5 3.8 161 –12 1,381 206 15,624 42.3Wichita . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63,847 60,830 3,017 2,852 2,820 4.5 4.6 3,279 –53 47,934 983 26,042 70.4Wilbarger . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,954 7,205 749 284 265 3.6 3.7 326 1 3,820 127 23,782 64.3Willacy. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,704 7,276 428 711 724 9.2 10.0 217 12 2,174 264 21,017 56.9

Williamson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 187,111 144,848 42,263 7,889 4,033 4.2 2.8 5,812 1,008 88,161 19,342 47,383 128.2Wilson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18,368 15,485 2,883 815 565 4.4 3.6 464 73 3,704 586 20,072 54.3Winkler . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,221 2,926 295 132 167 4.1 5.7 138 –17 1,079 83 26,338 71.2Wise . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28,434 25,273 3,161 1,248 880 4.4 3.5 1,014 118 11,298 375 30,072 81.3Wood . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18,110 16,212 1,898 928 796 5.1 4.9 834 60 7,493 1,354 21,971 59.4

Yoakum . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,462 3,309 153 148 176 4.3 5.3 172 –10 1,783 72 36,084 97.6Young . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,768 8,808 960 383 430 3.9 4.9 576 –17 5,027 –136 26,311 71.2Zapata. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,967 3,972 995 310 318 6.2 8.0 144 –4 1,622 281 21,883 59.2Zavala . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,793 3,707 86 449 463 11.8 12.5 105 –6 1,539 –465 15,796 42.7

UTAH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,311,073 1,136,036 175,037 38,272 38,121 2.9 3.4 362,834 37,455 3935,126 318,037 330,587 382.7

Beaver. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,095 2,688 407 93 93 3.0 3.5 156 19 1,393 110 16,724 45.2Box Elder . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22,825 19,978 2,847 721 740 3.2 3.7 888 85 16,069 –370 34,112 92.3Cache . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58,027 47,977 10,050 1,357 1,338 2.3 2.8 2,725 368 34,449 3,246 24,387 66.0Carbon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,863 9,227 636 342 519 3.5 5.6 551 38 6,660 307 29,867 80.8Daggett . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 515 460 55 24 18 4.7 3.9 23 2 97 –38 24,443 66.1

Davis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138,773 119,528 19,245 3,990 3,731 2.9 3.1 5,517 911 68,122 6,131 28,013 75.8Duchesne. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,270 6,095 2,175 239 301 2.9 4.9 456 78 3,739 775 26,887 72.7Emery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,251 4,703 548 183 226 3.5 4.8 171 –13 2,696 –43 38,620 104.5Garfield . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,668 2,469 199 132 168 4.9 6.8 160 11 1,028 –42 26,980 73.0Grand . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,065 4,619 446 240 303 4.7 6.6 403 23 2,901 64 22,286 60.3

Iron . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,753 16,809 3,944 583 547 2.8 3.3 1,060 224 10,929 948 21,294 57.6Juab . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,052 3,731 321 145 132 3.6 3.5 167 19 1,788 40 23,911 64.7Kane . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,399 3,011 388 119 115 3.5 3.8 224 37 1,649 221 20,070 54.3Millard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,179 5,162 1,017 182 178 2.9 3.4 255 18 2,605 67 31,709 85.8Morgan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,895 3,400 495 116 117 3.0 3.4 202 53 1,358 297 28,043 75.9

Piute . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 877 623 254 27 28 3.1 4.5 29 6 152 59 17,829 48.2Rich . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,377 1,039 338 31 31 2.3 3.0 68 12 226 –96 23,133 62.6Salt Lake . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 532,283 483,816 48,467 15,223 15,309 2.9 3.2 27,611 1,676 462,008 –18,867 34,320 92.8San Juan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,864 4,699 165 294 375 6.0 8.0 261 23 1,899 138 21,764 58.9Sanpete . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,652 9,630 1,022 393 424 3.7 4.4 419 50 4,149 369 18,110 49.0

Sevier . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,357 8,293 1,064 297 322 3.2 3.9 507 26 5,580 402 25,469 68.9Summit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22,068 18,165 3,903 618 632 2.8 3.5 1,767 277 19,660 4,218 22,809 61.7Tooele . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25,888 20,156 5,732 833 742 3.2 3.7 606 140 7,860 1,379 29,400 79.5Uintah . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,911 11,339 4,572 390 481 2.5 4.2 885 154 7,139 939 28,089 76.0Utah . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 212,422 180,176 32,246 5,924 5,297 2.8 2.9 8,797 1,670 138,492 –3,865 27,572 74.6

Wasatch. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,942 7,739 2,203 305 271 3.1 3.5 562 99 3,817 549 26,098 70.6Washington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61,128 39,148 21,980 1,759 1,377 2.9 3.5 3,380 869 33,878 7,239 24,868 67.3Wayne . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,381 1,310 71 59 60 4.3 4.6 82 8 614 153 23,010 62.2Weber . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110,296 100,047 10,249 3,652 4,246 3.3 4.2 4,732 454 65,717 –4,601 27,806 75.2

VERMONT . . . . . . . . . . . . . 361,044 335,798 25,246 13,018 9,056 3.6 2.7 322,133 3569 3256,132 32,591 331,049 384.0

Addison . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22,500 19,833 2,667 714 503 3.2 2.5 1,160 70 11,836 588 30,427 82.3Bennington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,884 19,936 948 746 567 3.6 2.8 1,538 –52 16,841 –153 30,729 83.1Caledonia. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,176 15,490 1,686 687 503 4.0 3.2 951 –27 9,571 16 27,339 74.0Chittenden . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89,396 85,239 4,157 2,845 1,873 3.2 2.2 5,461 153 83,635 –158 36,032 97.5Essex . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,332 3,266 66 137 127 4.1 3.9 144 12 1,113 –205 26,288 71.1

Franklin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26,633 24,533 2,100 1,086 703 4.1 2.9 1,104 –18 11,508 –135 29,113 78.8Grand Isle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,355 3,786 569 224 143 5.1 3.8 191 7 603 (NA) 26,491 71.7Lamoille . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,231 13,362 1,869 624 413 4.1 3.1 1,022 69 9,874 375 23,578 63.8Orange . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,745 15,546 1,199 552 368 3.3 2.4 840 72 6,994 733 27,656 74.8Orleans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,603 12,945 1,658 774 552 5.3 4.3 873 28 7,746 463 24,467 66.2

Rutland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36,638 33,601 3,037 1,410 1,021 3.8 3.0 2,360 65 25,968 –1,444 29,222 79.0Washington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34,806 32,850 1,956 1,309 862 3.8 2.6 2,329 85 25,729 518 30,155 81.6Windham . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25,415 24,392 1,023 926 661 3.6 2.7 1,871 34 22,374 –71 29,182 78.9Windsor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33,333 31,008 2,325 986 749 3.0 2.4 2,252 35 22,068 2,308 27,181 73.5

VIRGINIA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,998,569 3,584,037 414,532 119,581 81,513 3.0 2.3 3188,989 313,407 33,054,816 3151,268 337,610 3101.7

Accomack . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18,946 18,014 932 778 532 4.1 3.0 854 48 10,047 1,368 23,041 62.3Albemarle. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49,761 43,304 6,457 1,189 742 2.4 1.7 2,069 323 25,386 2,513 35,049 94.8Alleghany9 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,368 7,684 –316 352 231 4.8 3.0 258 109 3,513 1,006 23,376 63.2Amelia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,495 5,831 664 191 116 2.9 2.0 302 48 2,066 324 22,716 61.4Amherst . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,732 15,320 412 493 324 3.1 2.1 625 27 7,127 –92 26,213 70.9





County





2004

2006 2000

Netchange,

2000–2006 2006 2000 2006 2000 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004

Amount(dol.)

Percentof

U.S.average

VIRGINIA—Con.

Appomattox . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,995 6,727 268 250 166 3.6 2.5 253 –25 2,620 –519 22,093 59.8Arlington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127,546 118,618 8,928 2,461 1,849 1.9 1.6 5,574 347 121,926 7,186 53,972 146.0Augusta . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37,001 34,388 2,613 951 664 2.6 1.9 1,137 1 17,432 112 31,238 84.5Bath . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,935 2,721 214 93 72 3.2 2.6 152 12 1,682 931 29,037 78.5Bedford . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35,011 31,926 3,085 1,001 612 2.9 1.9 1,391 449 11,283 2,663 29,432 79.6

Bland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,211 2,914 297 114 151 3.6 5.2 91 –7 993 –165 30,000 81.2Botetourt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,546 16,374 1,172 443 290 2.5 1.8 724 140 7,203 855 29,495 79.8Brunswick. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,898 6,808 90 299 237 4.3 3.5 316 11 3,771 235 20,787 56.2Buchanan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,393 8,680 –287 406 505 4.8 5.8 506 –79 5,875 –634 33,505 90.6Buckingham . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,840 6,107 733 221 194 3.2 3.2 225 4 1,881 –47 22,557 61.0

Campbell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27,446 26,350 1,096 866 608 3.2 2.3 1,081 113 13,265 –783 28,169 76.2Caroline . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,230 10,933 2,297 443 237 3.3 2.2 394 30 3,662 687 25,762 69.7Carroll . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,058 14,727 –669 710 593 5.1 4.0 451 –5 5,004 75 20,930 56.6Charles City . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,863 3,593 270 149 88 3.9 2.4 190 61 2,153 706 25,243 68.3Charlotte . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,265 5,485 –220 343 172 6.5 3.1 261 18 2,657 6 21,630 58.5

Chesterfield . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163,190 141,459 21,731 4,432 2,521 2.7 1.8 6,197 700 95,883 13,961 32,762 88.6Clarke . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,019 6,866 1,153 192 108 2.4 1.6 363 62 3,553 276 31,420 85.0Craig . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,576 2,488 88 86 60 3.3 2.4 67 8 335 –8 22,540 61.0Culpeper . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,156 16,828 3,328 608 320 3.0 1.9 957 145 11,153 1,008 32,912 89.0Cumberland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,573 4,212 361 151 94 3.3 2.2 138 6 859 63 21,236 57.4

Dickenson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,664 5,330 334 285 307 5.0 5.8 258 –27 2,367 351 28,413 76.9Dinwiddie . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,879 11,965 914 399 249 3.1 2.1 367 117 5,072 215 31,743 85.9Essex . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,436 5,120 316 207 136 3.8 2.7 330 –3 3,373 –377 22,018 59.6Fairfax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 587,520 547,422 40,098 12,652 8,877 2.2 1.6 27,213 1,633 526,836 17,695 55,003 148.8Fauquier . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36,663 30,037 6,626 871 462 2.4 1.5 1,781 266 16,731 3,198 32,376 87.6

Floyd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,041 6,934 107 224 256 3.2 3.7 266 19 1,661 55 22,013 59.5Fluvanna . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,387 10,166 3,221 311 200 2.3 2.0 387 62 2,898 787 25,784 69.7Franklin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26,117 24,227 1,890 813 719 3.1 3.0 1,112 158 11,787 575 25,666 69.4Frederick . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40,544 32,723 7,821 1,039 662 2.6 2.0 1,319 134 20,853 2,036 31,001 83.9Giles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,406 7,750 656 310 326 3.7 4.2 317 –10 3,737 –882 31,477 85.1

Gloucester . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,189 17,489 2,700 528 336 2.6 1.9 902 94 7,032 747 21,812 59.0Goochland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,627 8,863 1,764 256 154 2.4 1.7 534 104 5,201 1,889 35,543 96.1Grayson. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,323 8,043 –720 386 409 5.3 5.1 180 –5 1,369 –75 19,909 53.9Greene . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,114 8,350 1,764 229 153 2.3 1.8 310 50 1,973 212 24,348 65.9Greensville . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,196 3,988 208 166 134 4.0 3.4 108 –9 1,992 72 29,198 79.0

Halifax10. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,874 16,101 –227 900 799 5.7 5.0 792 28 10,661 –848 25,086 67.9Hanover . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55,026 47,202 7,824 1,353 776 2.5 1.6 2,958 281 37,891 3,698 30,683 83.0Henrico . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 160,768 144,690 16,078 4,499 2,613 2.8 1.8 7,498 286 143,916 –4,490 39,977 108.1Henry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25,337 28,678 –3,341 1,180 1,389 4.7 4.8 910 27 12,466 –2,089 25,223 68.2Highland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,161 1,164 –3 35 33 3.0 2.8 93 –8 403 –14 18,705 50.6

Isle of Wight . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,685 14,819 2,866 543 320 3.1 2.2 584 55 9,834 259 28,467 77.0James City . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29,348 23,153 6,195 775 453 2.6 2.0 1,262 226 17,196 4,847 27,539 74.5King and Queen . . . . . . . . . . . 3,350 3,142 208 110 80 3.3 2.5 126 23 830 261 24,329 65.8King George . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,583 8,356 1,227 297 161 3.1 1.9 424 47 4,370 212 38,708 104.7King William . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,109 6,987 1,122 217 131 2.7 1.9 347 37 3,903 720 39,317 106.4

Lancaster . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,171 4,815 356 221 276 4.3 5.7 526 30 4,190 470 27,440 74.2Lee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,227 8,774 453 393 367 4.3 4.2 345 –12 2,973 –512 23,383 63.3Loudoun . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152,430 99,476 52,954 3,216 1,404 2.1 1.4 6,093 1,584 98,902 30,867 48,488 131.2Louisa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,514 12,810 2,704 473 304 3.0 2.4 533 41 4,563 375 36,156 97.8Lunenburg . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,598 5,341 257 231 184 4.1 3.4 201 12 2,200 411 22,374 60.5

Madison. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,274 6,520 754 187 115 2.6 1.8 299 24 2,371 31 22,380 60.5Mathews . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,485 4,233 252 116 92 2.6 2.2 230 15 1,214 2 19,748 53.4Mecklenburg . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,208 14,159 –951 666 473 5.0 3.3 878 37 11,578 –442 21,693 58.7Middlesex. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,043 4,517 526 155 94 3.1 2.1 390 26 2,382 23 21,480 58.1Montgomery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43,812 40,573 3,239 1,327 1,019 3.0 2.5 1,903 110 26,626 2,469 27,014 73.1

Nelson. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,786 6,991 795 212 162 2.7 2.3 418 32 3,208 629 23,429 63.4New Kent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,037 7,256 1,781 246 132 2.7 1.8 282 18 1,938 –267 25,385 68.7Northampton. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,946 5,568 378 255 147 4.3 2.6 361 39 3,331 –90 26,437 71.5Northumberland. . . . . . . . . . . . 5,991 5,404 587 247 242 4.1 4.5 380 43 2,521 390 26,346 71.3Nottoway . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,445 6,135 310 244 179 3.8 2.9 356 4 3,832 –143 22,074 59.7

Orange . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,082 12,661 2,421 435 259 2.9 2.0 692 78 7,688 587 29,976 81.1Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,356 11,712 –356 512 304 4.5 2.6 482 17 5,330 –424 22,111 59.8Patrick . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,864 9,450 –586 400 310 4.5 3.3 327 17 3,561 –881 22,063 59.7Pittsylvania . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31,086 31,761 –675 1,674 1,045 5.4 3.3 906 –32 10,189 –1,573 23,049 62.3Powhatan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,916 11,183 2,733 354 202 2.5 1.8 571 106 3,561 –1,609 28,996 78.4

Prince Edward. . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,791 8,084 707 413 270 4.7 3.3 567 30 7,010 –872 21,770 58.9Prince George. . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,427 13,144 2,283 496 335 3.2 2.5 389 33 6,978 2,578 33,741 91.3Prince William . . . . . . . . . . . . . 196,161 152,695 43,466 4,606 2,686 2.3 1.8 5,994 1,611 80,264 18,305 29,366 79.4Pulaski. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18,253 17,288 965 695 777 3.8 4.5 662 –3 11,205 –2,097 28,246 76.4Rappahannock . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,349 3,731 618 100 69 2.3 1.8 187 –30 1,027 –406 28,463 77.0





County





2004

2006 2000

Netchange,

2000–2006 2006 2000 2006 2000 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004

Amount(dol.)

Percentof

U.S.average

VIRGINIA—Con.

Richmond. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,474 3,404 70 149 146 4.3 4.3 226 3 1,840 29 24,267 65.6Roanoke . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48,130 45,736 2,394 1,239 792 2.6 1.7 2,102 672 33,536 10,095 32,719 88.5Rockbridge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,308 10,610 698 304 228 2.7 2.1 311 10 4,123 –349 23,671 64.0Rockingham . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42,332 35,907 6,425 989 604 2.3 1.7 1,253 103 22,146 –1,022 27,233 73.7Russell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,796 11,789 7 681 606 5.8 5.1 518 –49 6,818 449 27,556 74.5

Scott . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,059 9,710 349 478 370 4.8 3.8 331 3 3,408 158 24,798 67.1Shenandoah . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,112 18,401 1,711 577 327 2.9 1.8 931 36 12,563 –203 26,289 71.1Smyth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,740 15,764 –24 697 680 4.4 4.3 620 –68 10,827 –1,234 27,286 73.8Southampton . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,598 7,443 155 271 204 3.6 2.7 257 –18 3,491 –765 41,837 113.2Spotsylvania . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64,038 48,232 15,806 1,520 819 2.4 1.7 1,897 556 25,395 7,237 27,002 73.0

Stafford . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63,703 48,134 15,569 1,525 809 2.4 1.7 1,859 414 23,224 5,346 29,660 80.2Surry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,672 3,375 297 123 97 3.3 2.9 80 –4 1,421 11 66,160 179.0Sussex . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,484 4,504 –20 196 165 4.4 3.7 194 –2 2,325 –605 24,825 67.2Tazewell. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,760 18,877 883 781 959 4.0 5.1 1,219 8 14,454 1,312 23,276 63.0Warren . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,257 16,483 2,774 528 332 2.7 2.0 816 56 8,658 603 26,555 71.8

Washington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26,702 24,989 1,713 1,071 889 4.0 3.6 1,185 21 14,587 104 26,885 72.7Westmoreland . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,142 7,637 505 318 269 3.9 3.5 376 –6 2,353 –45 20,592 55.7Wise . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,269 16,051 1,218 766 673 4.4 4.2 912 –8 10,533 1,071 26,966 72.9Wythe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,077 14,074 1,003 598 606 4.0 4.3 711 –11 9,085 –246 24,140 65.3York . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31,175 26,697 4,478 817 517 2.6 1.9 1,349 167 15,080 1,135 24,447 66.1

Independent Cities

Alexandria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87,612 80,458 7,154 1,895 1,422 2.2 1.8 4,743 102 83,715 2,202 45,752 123.8Bedford . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,605 2,592 13 96 64 3.7 2.5 339 –146 4,867 –1,098 24,598 66.5Bristol . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,943 7,468 475 373 237 4.7 3.2 698 6 14,710 –844 26,644 72.1Buena Vista . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,413 3,207 206 114 73 3.3 2.3 134 9 2,423 326 26,849 72.6Charlottesville . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,722 19,260 1,462 645 566 3.1 2.9 2,433 140 37,569 –3,904 32,896 89.0

Chesapeake . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113,965 97,374 16,591 3,644 2,213 3.2 2.3 5,051 552 88,344 11,894 28,815 77.9Clifton Forge9 . . . . . . . . . . . . . (X) (X) (NA) (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) (NA) (X) (NA) (NA) (NA)Colonial Heights . . . . . . . . . . . 9,266 8,565 701 289 192 3.1 2.2 676 21 9,630 –555 23,416 63.3Covington. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,834 2,882 –48 196 113 6.9 3.9 283 6 4,398 –344 37,244 100.7Danville . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,306 21,255 –949 1,729 926 8.5 4.4 1,551 56 26,613 –601 26,185 70.8

Emporia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,622 2,352 270 136 73 5.2 3.1 255 –13 4,642 125 22,174 60.0Fairfax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,227 12,432 795 314 167 2.4 1.3 2,375 207 36,087 1,863 42,707 115.5Falls Church . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,634 6,119 515 185 98 2.8 1.6 903 36 17,005 1,624 42,615 115.3Franklin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,765 3,548 217 175 112 4.6 3.2 302 61 3,785 638 22,729 61.5Fredericksburg . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,585 10,262 1,323 450 235 3.9 2.3 1,650 –19 24,394 604 29,597 80.1

Galax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,082 3,285 –203 181 114 5.9 3.5 366 41 6,716 –1,301 22,533 61.0Hampton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67,785 63,944 3,841 2,450 1,719 3.6 2.7 2,506 55 45,056 –3,679 28,305 76.6Harrisonburg. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21,976 19,539 2,437 637 444 2.9 2.3 1,722 177 30,068 5,007 25,563 69.1Hopewell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,483 9,813 670 473 278 4.5 2.8 464 –13 6,952 –1,156 35,537 96.1Lexington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,327 2,230 97 107 79 4.6 3.5 458 12 4,972 323 24,260 65.6

Lynchburg . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32,085 30,601 1,484 1,144 740 3.6 2.4 2,379 –160 53,321 –4,218 32,993 89.2Manassas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21,228 19,160 2,068 531 320 2.5 1.7 1,529 –420 20,841 –3,482 42,541 115.1Manassas Park . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,752 5,756 996 153 80 2.3 1.4 290 128 3,413 892 39,491 106.8Martinsville . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,850 6,698 –848 419 523 7.2 7.8 732 –25 13,400 –2,657 24,850 67.2Newport News. . . . . . . . . . . . . 87,490 82,380 5,110 3,048 2,135 3.5 2.6 3,802 108 86,220 1,343 33,529 90.7

Norfolk. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97,533 92,428 5,105 4,045 3,015 4.1 3.3 5,760 301 127,492 10,569 35,707 96.6Norton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,525 1,479 46 78 61 5.1 4.1 272 –25 4,860 –189 32,256 87.3Petersburg . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,221 13,832 389 853 470 6.0 3.4 786 –93 12,456 –1,590 30,699 83.0Poquoson. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,278 5,797 481 146 106 2.3 1.8 203 26 1,539 126 20,391 55.2Portsmouth. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45,435 42,693 2,742 1,975 1,446 4.3 3.4 1,791 112 28,777 3,139 28,499 77.1

Radford . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,323 7,423 –100 272 238 3.7 3.2 363 7 6,305 –808 32,761 88.6Richmond. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97,794 94,849 2,945 4,354 2,498 4.5 2.6 7,772 263 159,105 –3,281 42,829 115.9Roanoke . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46,585 46,423 162 1,685 1,133 3.6 2.4 3,450 –723 63,590 –11,745 31,646 85.6Salem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,149 12,897 252 384 247 2.9 1.9 985 25 21,749 –871 34,052 92.1South Boston10 . . . . . . . . . . . . (X) (X) (NA) (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) (NA) (X) (NA) (NA) (NA)

Staunton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,484 11,574 –90 341 247 3.0 2.1 987 87 12,237 833 23,227 62.8Suffolk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38,524 29,149 9,375 1,336 728 3.5 2.5 1,239 84 19,451 3,142 29,888 80.8Virginia Beach. . . . . . . . . . . . . 224,325 204,662 19,663 6,424 4,529 2.9 2.2 10,789 532 155,957 10,746 28,115 76.1Waynesboro . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,002 9,095 907 310 234 3.1 2.6 708 91 9,740 –619 27,707 75.0Williamsburg . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,816 4,577 239 280 198 5.8 4.3 745 –53 17,202 63 24,403 66.0Winchester . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,545 12,835 1,710 409 284 2.8 2.2 1,341 96 24,699 1,091 33,485 90.6

WASHINGTON. . . . . . . . . . . 3,326,524 3,050,021 276,503 166,174 151,344 5.0 5.0 3171,529 37,511 32,268,913 31,428 339,735 3107.5

Adams. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,040 8,039 1 519 605 6.5 7.5 384 –14 3,917 100 27,944 75.6Asotin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,373 9,657 716 498 487 4.8 5.0 437 –6 4,033 –99 27,384 74.1Benton. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84,079 76,077 8,002 4,818 3,753 5.7 4.9 3,617 318 54,917 4,380 38,578 104.4Chelan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39,784 36,485 3,299 2,055 2,357 5.2 6.5 2,363 78 24,393 173 30,110 81.5Clallam . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29,644 25,823 3,821 1,757 1,773 5.9 6.9 2,216 148 16,753 1,526 26,471 71.6





County





2004

2006 2000

Netchange,

2000–2006 2006 2000 2006 2000 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004

Amount(dol.)

Percentof

U.S.average

WASHINGTON—Con.

Clark . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 205,800 179,371 26,429 12,020 8,523 5.8 4.8 8,936 900 102,357 4,438 34,566 93.5Columbia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,508 1,778 –270 133 141 8.8 7.9 136 7 875 –145 26,187 70.8Cowlitz. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42,965 43,153 –188 2,816 2,735 6.6 6.3 2,309 –26 31,284 –1,230 34,245 92.6Douglas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,198 18,051 2,147 1,010 1,099 5.0 6.1 592 52 5,049 855 25,457 68.9Ferry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,918 2,972 –54 276 280 9.5 9.4 144 –5 714 –343 27,941 75.6

Franklin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28,992 22,949 6,043 2,096 1,644 7.2 7.2 1,215 90 15,203 1,257 27,985 75.7Garfield . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,053 1,035 18 58 48 5.5 4.6 54 –1 371 5 24,383 66.0Grant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38,821 35,587 3,234 2,579 2,754 6.6 7.7 1,729 47 16,557 151 27,278 73.8Grays Harbor . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31,083 29,227 1,856 2,203 2,134 7.1 7.3 1,913 –3 18,329 377 30,059 81.3Island . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32,521 28,974 3,547 1,677 1,445 5.2 5.0 1,761 150 11,769 616 25,290 68.4

Jefferson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,577 11,663 1,914 688 628 5.1 5.4 1,095 66 8,436 1,722 24,957 67.5King . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,044,342 984,531 59,811 43,702 39,864 4.2 4.0 60,825 1,014 984,046 –48,840 49,309 133.4Kitsap . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122,472 105,983 16,489 5,836 5,332 4.8 5.0 5,750 510 54,895 5,006 28,342 76.7Kittitas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,606 17,253 2,353 1,032 945 5.3 5.5 1,097 71 9,601 1,881 21,647 58.6Klickitat . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,505 9,274 231 677 698 7.1 7.5 537 –2 3,109 –524 28,940 78.3

Lewis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31,192 29,745 1,447 2,182 2,175 7.0 7.3 1,955 19 19,692 474 30,074 81.4Lincoln. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,682 4,612 70 270 218 5.8 4.7 287 –13 1,697 –132 25,265 68.3Mason . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24,537 20,942 3,595 1,449 1,330 5.9 6.4 1,055 42 9,757 958 27,803 75.2Okanogan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,803 20,526 277 1,385 1,682 6.7 8.2 1,118 57 7,313 –1,379 23,384 63.3Pacific . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,141 8,573 568 605 604 6.6 7.0 642 –22 4,268 –103 21,250 57.5

Pend Oreille . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,124 4,604 520 381 350 7.4 7.6 252 33 1,888 332 32,656 88.3Pierce . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 373,629 339,966 33,663 19,302 16,970 5.2 5.0 16,460 910 215,580 7,361 34,237 92.6San Juan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,186 7,493 693 321 297 3.9 4.0 961 96 4,047 274 28,888 78.1Skagit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56,528 51,918 4,610 2,950 3,009 5.2 5.8 3,442 185 36,865 1,208 31,095 84.1Skamania. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,109 4,808 301 362 293 7.1 6.1 182 18 1,291 65 26,705 72.2

Snohomish . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 357,485 322,902 34,583 16,519 14,552 4.6 4.5 16,346 1,031 206,608 1,895 36,990 100.1Spokane . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 227,834 211,201 16,633 11,493 10,922 5.0 5.2 12,156 467 170,031 1,758 31,725 85.8Stevens . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18,144 17,498 646 1,296 1,267 7.1 7.2 964 122 7,496 412 27,149 73.4Thurston . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124,016 108,262 15,754 5,754 4,941 4.6 4.6 5,511 461 59,987 7,018 29,665 80.2Wahkiakum. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,636 1,655 –19 107 110 6.5 6.6 86 –11 555 5 25,923 70.1

Walla Walla . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28,806 27,147 1,659 1,580 1,542 5.5 5.7 1,327 77 17,259 408 26,982 73.0Whatcom . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103,263 88,022 15,241 4,711 4,514 4.6 5.1 5,950 564 64,824 5,187 29,598 80.1Whitman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,404 19,271 1,133 831 716 4.1 3.7 857 –1 7,411 282 26,639 72.1Yakima . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118,733 113,000 5,733 8,229 8,612 6.9 7.6 4,707 –52 60,350 86 28,353 76.7

WEST VIRGINIA . . . . . . . . . 806,996 808,861 –1,865 39,862 44,212 4.9 5.5 340,837 3–210 3568,619 310,448 327,449 374.3

Barbour . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,768 6,662 106 387 525 5.7 7.9 248 –8 2,270 –229 21,211 57.4Berkeley. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44,516 39,607 4,909 1,878 1,427 4.2 3.6 1,625 182 22,512 2,708 29,625 80.1Boone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,472 9,809 –337 451 664 4.8 6.8 358 –36 6,243 720 40,249 108.9Braxton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,957 5,850 107 331 428 5.6 7.3 315 –6 3,101 16 21,895 59.2Brooke. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,014 11,801 –787 819 535 7.4 4.5 435 –12 12,586 5,059 32,680 88.4

Cabell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44,765 44,794 –29 2,043 2,137 4.6 4.8 2,721 –71 46,499 1,434 27,081 73.3Calhoun . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,743 2,932 –189 200 301 7.3 10.3 127 –8 956 –121 22,950 62.1Clay . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,512 3,643 –131 242 308 6.9 8.5 133 –3 1,312 91 31,923 86.4Doddridge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,905 2,909 –4 153 169 5.3 5.8 73 –4 543 –41 19,425 52.5Fayette . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18,110 18,498 –388 1,027 1,312 5.7 7.1 920 –33 8,822 –1,023 24,943 67.5

Gilmer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,136 2,785 351 147 202 4.7 7.3 125 –1 1,034 77 19,390 52.5Grant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,065 5,472 –407 308 290 6.1 5.3 265 –24 2,698 –562 31,838 86.1Greenbrier . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,716 15,118 598 970 983 6.2 6.5 1,019 2 10,792 717 23,596 63.8Hampshire . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,860 9,349 511 389 304 3.9 3.3 342 9 2,991 219 20,138 54.5Hancock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,604 15,687 –1,083 1,120 705 7.7 4.5 701 27 10,104 –4,067 21,507 58.2

Hardy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,271 6,684 587 285 255 3.9 3.8 270 10 6,190 1,039 19,688 53.3Harrison. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30,789 31,333 –544 1,453 1,790 4.7 5.7 1,892 25 26,881 1,898 27,242 73.7Jackson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,842 12,731 –889 622 751 5.3 5.9 555 13 7,096 –73 29,704 80.4Jefferson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24,904 23,360 1,544 834 796 3.3 3.4 919 113 11,296 563 23,951 64.8Kanawha . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91,830 97,302 –5,472 4,040 4,802 4.4 4.9 5,850 –141 94,877 –1,845 30,037 81.3

Lewis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,386 7,462 –76 383 433 5.2 5.8 406 – 4,989 658 22,069 59.7Lincoln. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,950 8,135 –185 487 595 6.1 7.3 259 27 2,056 275 22,696 61.4Logan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,985 13,737 –752 632 1,034 4.9 7.5 762 –52 9,424 104 28,210 76.3McDowell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,952 7,089 –137 543 729 7.8 10.3 328 –78 2,986 –753 24,856 67.2Marion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26,293 25,992 301 1,162 1,490 4.4 5.7 1,299 12 16,831 –42 26,571 71.9

Marshall . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,068 15,884 –816 866 900 5.7 5.7 528 –26 7,557 832 30,445 82.4Mason . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,539 10,577 –38 736 851 7.0 8.0 345 1 4,569 –519 30,658 82.9Mercer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23,987 25,643 –1,656 1,208 1,285 5.0 5.0 1,386 –71 18,880 –1,684 24,898 67.4Mineral . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,381 12,981 400 668 703 5.0 5.4 478 –2 5,571 571 24,702 66.8Mingo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,595 9,088 –493 475 718 5.5 7.9 549 –72 5,859 –941 30,684 83.0

Monongalia. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46,020 41,267 4,753 1,573 1,808 3.4 4.4 2,074 79 34,091 3,968 28,119 76.1Monroe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,962 5,849 113 327 306 5.5 5.2 223 30 1,332 189 22,868 61.9Morgan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,166 7,286 –120 336 284 4.7 3.9 278 30 2,467 62 23,495 63.6Nicholas. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,697 11,071 –374 572 753 5.3 6.8 634 – 6,778 –349 25,543 69.1Ohio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21,000 22,449 –1,449 1,015 991 4.8 4.4 1,529 –56 28,026 1,023 24,987 67.6





County





2004

2006 2000

Netchange,

2000–2006 2006 2000 2006 2000 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004

Amount(dol.)

Percentof

U.S.average

WEST VIRGINIA—Con.

Pendleton. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,859 3,964 –105 165 310 4.3 7.8 177 15 1,257 –398 20,549 55.6Pleasants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,213 3,325 –112 180 192 5.6 5.8 137 1 1,850 39 37,958 102.7Pocahontas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,827 4,034 –207 297 268 7.8 6.6 279 26 3,600 396 18,985 51.4Preston . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,879 13,400 1,479 676 751 4.5 5.6 606 –19 4,841 –620 21,548 58.3Putnam . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26,821 26,210 611 1,116 1,255 4.2 4.8 1,138 46 15,789 2,857 31,614 85.5

Raleigh . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32,937 32,716 221 1,496 2,005 4.5 6.1 1,920 –68 25,518 543 27,008 73.1Randolph . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,176 12,837 339 671 771 5.1 6.0 765 –5 9,575 367 22,379 60.5Ritchie . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,768 4,610 158 240 288 5.0 6.2 221 11 2,763 307 28,355 76.7Roane . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,529 6,205 –676 347 557 6.3 9.0 273 –29 2,482 –373 22,237 60.2Summers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,753 4,803 –50 303 331 6.4 6.9 203 7 1,577 33 20,301 54.9

Taylor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,016 6,973 43 369 379 5.3 5.4 215 1 2,018 –59 22,236 60.2Tucker . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,077 3,328 –251 191 209 6.2 6.3 203 1 2,270 –142 19,570 52.9Tyler . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,677 3,840 –163 264 227 7.2 5.9 147 – 1,570 –311 36,953 100.0Upshur. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,817 10,379 438 517 619 4.8 6.0 554 17 6,953 362 23,317 63.1Wayne . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,889 17,681 208 966 924 5.4 5.2 599 –29 7,142 –777 31,031 83.9

Webster . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,447 3,259 188 199 237 5.8 7.3 181 –13 2,056 305 26,173 70.8Wetzel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,366 7,113 –747 525 566 8.2 8.0 409 –26 4,843 –487 32,627 88.3Wirt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,508 2,562 –54 154 179 6.1 7.0 70 –4 392 86 16,161 43.7Wood . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41,329 42,178 –849 2,040 1,918 4.9 4.5 2,282 –39 35,799 –1,397 27,000 73.0Wyoming . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,349 8,614 –265 467 667 5.6 7.7 392 –11 3,961 –163 25,398 68.7

WISCONSIN . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,062,932 2,996,091 66,841 144,777 101,207 4.7 3.4 3144,116 33,701 32,435,143 320,309 334,016 392.0

Adams. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,926 8,904 1,022 660 372 6.6 4.2 325 43 2,511 201 27,304 73.9Ashland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,401 8,932 469 563 468 6.0 5.2 601 34 7,148 –190 26,171 70.8Barron . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25,499 25,037 462 1,412 966 5.5 3.9 1,316 30 16,619 –316 27,072 73.2Bayfield . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,345 7,738 607 530 404 6.4 5.2 461 26 2,262 –39 20,974 56.7Brown . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137,348 131,661 5,687 6,220 3,728 4.5 2.8 6,610 315 136,265 4,389 35,010 94.7

Buffalo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,810 7,894 916 341 282 3.9 3.6 366 1 4,452 619 35,874 97.0Burnett . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,544 7,810 734 496 293 5.8 3.8 455 13 3,526 78 25,567 69.2Calumet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25,411 24,197 1,214 1,037 650 4.1 2.7 818 49 14,220 1,798 31,009 83.9Chippewa. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33,652 30,084 3,568 1,735 1,253 5.2 4.2 1,458 222 18,195 591 29,646 80.2Clark . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18,082 17,586 496 968 739 5.4 4.2 805 5 8,710 80 24,867 67.3

Columbia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31,995 29,944 2,051 1,489 1,074 4.7 3.6 1,569 127 20,516 2,289 26,417 71.5Crawford . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,938 9,166 772 476 327 4.8 3.6 436 42 6,256 –479 24,905 67.4Dane . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 289,005 266,527 22,478 9,378 6,206 3.2 2.3 13,025 645 247,136 25,682 36,235 98.0Dodge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47,070 47,656 –586 2,353 1,495 5.0 3.1 1,880 46 28,470 –869 32,211 87.1Door . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,727 16,510 217 901 637 5.4 3.9 1,326 42 10,519 –662 27,037 73.1

Douglas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23,053 22,831 222 1,155 969 5.0 4.2 1,119 10 14,119 105 24,983 67.6Dunn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24,209 22,574 1,635 1,091 765 4.5 3.4 900 –81 13,007 –381 27,016 73.1Eau Claire . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55,505 53,384 2,121 2,205 1,691 4.0 3.2 2,610 –76 46,952 1,024 28,462 77.0Florence. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,584 2,628 –44 173 106 6.7 4.0 115 12 687 33 20,001 54.1Fond du Lac . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56,629 55,962 667 2,669 1,669 4.7 3.0 2,517 1 43,859 –1,247 29,663 80.2

Forest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,036 4,657 379 334 260 6.6 5.6 345 43 2,359 –20 26,004 70.3Grant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27,496 27,557 –61 1,223 898 4.4 3.3 1,274 10 13,657 –266 23,385 63.3Green . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,349 20,122 227 887 625 4.4 3.1 962 20 11,969 –1,122 28,344 76.7Green Lake . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,482 10,768 –286 578 415 5.5 3.9 560 –61 6,181 –667 29,331 79.3Iowa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,436 13,702 734 623 388 4.3 2.8 612 17 9,185 –1,198 31,691 85.7

Iron . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,215 3,277 –62 264 219 8.2 6.7 235 10 2,007 –50 20,759 56.2Jackson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,007 9,842 165 550 445 5.5 4.5 440 38 5,588 478 30,816 83.4Jefferson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43,159 43,413 –254 1,948 1,225 4.5 2.8 1,985 48 32,250 –1,114 28,204 76.3Juneau . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,695 12,855 840 779 627 5.7 4.9 608 –34 6,738 –1,321 26,526 71.8Kenosha . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83,021 81,196 1,825 4,469 3,268 5.4 4.0 3,190 53 50,957 1,661 30,099 81.4

Kewaunee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,936 11,656 280 529 310 4.4 2.7 483 –9 5,189 –363 29,569 80.0La Crosse . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62,778 61,599 1,179 2,407 1,953 3.8 3.2 3,007 72 58,118 1,101 30,926 83.7Lafayette . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,158 9,215 –57 378 267 4.1 2.9 357 10 2,368 –437 22,851 61.8Langlade . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,827 10,830 –3 655 487 6.0 4.5 624 22 6,849 139 25,111 67.9Lincoln. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,931 16,205 –274 886 661 5.6 4.1 818 40 9,568 75 28,770 77.8

Manitowoc . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45,519 47,177 –1,658 2,252 1,503 4.9 3.2 1,888 –55 30,549 –3,840 30,509 82.5Marathon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75,581 72,349 3,232 3,215 2,354 4.3 3.3 3,363 –74 63,645 8 31,298 84.7Marinette . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22,083 22,555 –472 1,424 969 6.4 4.3 1,209 105 17,759 565 29,497 79.8Marquette. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,939 7,557 382 469 402 5.9 5.3 378 30 3,460 146 26,476 71.6Menominee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,681 1,645 36 186 143 11.1 8.7 20 –75 825 –826 20,942 56.6

Milwaukee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 456,542 478,428 –21,886 25,966 20,338 5.7 4.3 21,156 –159 466,863 –13,709 38,583 104.4Monroe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24,248 21,719 2,529 1,025 790 4.2 3.6 934 63 13,592 –37 27,558 74.5Oconto . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,544 19,496 1,048 1,252 685 6.1 3.5 829 –22 7,199 –1,508 23,760 64.3Oneida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,199 19,802 397 1,177 956 5.8 4.8 1,421 –163 15,685 –694 28,256 76.4Outagamie . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96,174 93,575 2,599 4,440 2,708 4.6 2.9 4,939 226 93,532 –3,458 34,278 92.7

Ozaukee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48,212 47,698 514 1,745 1,181 3.6 2.5 2,815 –67 37,651 293 36,453 98.6Pepin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,131 3,931 200 195 135 4.7 3.4 218 17 1,600 –193 28,656 77.5Pierce . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23,809 22,914 895 994 584 4.2 2.5 858 62 7,418 583 25,627 69.3Polk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24,178 22,800 1,378 1,392 750 5.8 3.3 1,211 149 12,664 919 26,845 72.6Portage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41,167 38,840 2,327 1,847 1,342 4.5 3.5 1,633 –3 27,199 400 31,577 85.4





County





2004

2006 2000

Netchange,

2000–2006 2006 2000 2006 2000 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004 2004

Netchange,

2000–2004

Amount(dol.)

Percentof

U.S.average

WISCONSIN—Con.

Price . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,690 8,403 287 484 416 5.6 5.0 478 10 5,565 –199 26,061 70.5Racine. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98,961 99,866 –905 5,634 3,891 5.7 3.9 4,271 123 71,826 –1,601 35,640 96.4Richland. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,112 9,650 462 467 326 4.6 3.4 417 57 4,924 220 25,224 68.2Rock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84,195 82,916 1,279 4,248 3,436 5.0 4.1 3,518 158 60,258 –495 33,964 91.9Rusk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,915 7,936 –21 526 404 6.6 5.1 333 –2 4,539 157 26,239 71.0

St. Croix. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45,658 38,057 7,601 2,254 911 4.9 2.4 2,009 326 25,887 3,697 36,061 97.5Sauk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34,983 33,333 1,650 1,569 977 4.5 2.9 1,754 73 29,969 3,994 28,483 77.1Sawyer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,388 8,459 929 602 439 6.4 5.2 682 34 4,509 –508 26,671 72.1Shawano . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22,704 22,127 577 1,146 783 5.0 3.5 975 58 10,668 238 24,845 67.2Sheboygan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65,113 64,605 508 2,594 1,595 4.0 2.5 2,750 146 54,075 –3,153 33,302 90.1

Taylor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,041 11,020 21 554 406 5.0 3.7 494 22 7,995 279 26,769 72.4Trempealeau. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,505 15,477 1,028 699 601 4.2 3.9 686 13 12,181 2,405 32,875 88.9Vernon. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,560 14,407 153 695 523 4.8 3.6 641 5 6,056 –228 23,428 63.4Vilas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,928 10,998 930 715 533 6.0 4.8 959 166 6,165 1,775 22,290 60.3Walworth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56,138 54,199 1,939 2,415 1,580 4.3 2.9 2,658 73 36,369 870 27,822 75.3

Washburn. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,080 8,029 51 533 400 6.6 5.0 643 65 5,891 733 23,478 63.5Washington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72,883 70,096 2,787 3,052 1,939 4.2 2.8 3,317 213 49,904 2,563 31,562 85.4Waukesha . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 214,447 211,346 3,101 8,202 5,667 3.8 2.7 12,746 177 219,724 –5,567 39,067 105.7Waupaca . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28,382 27,906 476 1,427 912 5.0 3.3 1,378 15 18,031 652 27,818 75.3Waushara. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,134 11,836 1,298 726 483 5.5 4.1 535 13 4,477 64 20,535 55.5Winnebago . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92,491 89,989 2,502 4,147 2,452 4.5 2.7 3,723 5 87,555 5,759 38,581 104.4Wood . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40,360 41,040 –680 2,149 1,557 5.3 3.8 1,919 10 38,533 –881 34,619 93.6

WYOMING . . . . . . . . . . . . . 284,690 266,882 17,808 9,073 10,197 3.2 3.8 319,330 31,210 3187,360 312,746 330,404 382.2

Albany . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18,985 18,300 685 505 612 2.7 3.3 1,063 47 10,170 599 23,383 63.3Big Horn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,397 5,317 80 225 267 4.2 5.0 293 –4 2,454 –176 28,050 75.9Campbell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24,807 19,908 4,899 533 609 2.1 3.1 1,320 135 17,318 2,206 41,768 113.0Carbon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,899 8,094 –195 270 337 3.4 4.2 552 –11 4,600 –383 27,346 74.0Converse . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,955 6,582 373 237 258 3.4 3.9 426 52 3,436 771 32,139 86.9

Crook . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,382 3,173 209 96 116 2.8 3.7 209 26 1,337 –18 27,144 73.4Fremont . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,846 17,665 181 769 916 4.3 5.2 1,317 22 9,989 –193 24,605 66.6Goshen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,913 6,249 –336 231 227 3.9 3.6 378 –5 2,934 –58 21,753 58.8Hot Springs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,345 2,643 –298 85 96 3.6 3.6 197 –6 1,592 72 22,138 59.9Johnson. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,866 3,575 291 120 133 3.1 3.7 355 27 1,976 317 24,588 66.5

Laramie . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42,100 40,237 1,863 1,636 1,505 3.9 3.7 2,474 186 29,309 2,408 28,008 75.8Lincoln. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,017 7,357 660 287 285 3.6 3.9 546 67 4,351 430 29,470 79.7Natrona . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40,620 36,536 4,084 1,208 1,426 3.0 3.9 2,769 144 30,020 2,463 30,965 83.8Niobrara. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,136 1,236 –100 38 45 3.3 3.6 87 –6 359 –143 18,061 48.9Park . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,362 14,378 –16 511 579 3.6 4.0 1,267 98 9,378 335 27,889 75.4

Platte . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,011 4,355 –344 178 176 4.4 4.0 276 7 2,148 –10 28,454 77.0Sheridan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,540 14,755 785 494 587 3.2 4.0 1,153 67 9,455 860 25,731 69.6Sublette . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,682 3,560 2,122 100 105 1.8 2.9 401 76 1,960 635 31,670 85.7Sweetwater. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23,198 20,716 2,482 587 819 2.5 4.0 1,185 105 14,109 91 36,623 99.1

Teton. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,204 14,183 21 366 343 2.6 2.4 1,745 73 14,330 –47 27,958 75.6Uinta . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,048 10,461 587 335 419 3.0 4.0 611 58 6,660 615 28,868 78.1Washakie . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,264 4,306 –42 156 198 3.7 4.6 362 –18 3,400 230 24,086 65.2Weston . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,114 3,299 –185 108 140 3.5 4.2 225 17 1,601 41 22,598 61.1

– Represents zero. NA Not available. X Not applicable.

1Civilian unemployed as percent of total civilian labor force.2For pay period including March 12 of the year shown.3Includes data not distributed by county.4Colorado state total includes Broomfield city.5Yellowstone National Park County became incorporated with Gallatin and Park Counties, MT; effective November 7, 1997.60 to 19 employees. Figure in table represents midpoint of range.7100 to 249 employees. Figure in table represents midpoint of range.820 to 99 employees. Figure in table represents midpoint of range.9Clifton Forge independent city became incorporated with Alleghany County, VA; effective July 1, 2001.10South Boston independent city became incorporated with Halifax County, VA; effective June 30, 1995.

Survey, Census, or Data Collection Method: Civilian labor force—Based on the Current Population Survey (CPS), the Current Employment Statistics (CES) survey, and the unemploymentinsurance (UI) system; for more information, see Appendix B, Limitations of the Data and Methodology, and also <http://www.bls.gov/lau/laumthd.htm>. Private nonfarm businesses—For dataextracted from the Census Bureau’s County Business Patterns, see Internet site <http://www.census.gov/epcd/cbp/view/cbpmethodology.htm>.

Sources: Civilian labor force—U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Local Area Unemployment Statistics, Annual Averages, accessed April 17, 2007 (related Internet site <http://www.bls.gov/lau>).Private nonfarm businesses—U.S. Census Bureau, County Business Patterns, accessed July 12, 2006 (related Internet site <http://www.census.gov/epcd/cbp/view/cbpview.html>).


Documents

Counties — Labor Force and Private Business Establishments ...€¦ · Table B-10. Counties — Labor Force and Private Business Establishments and Employment [Includes United States,