Upload
phamdung
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1. Company
3. Contact Person for ILS (First, Last Name)
5. What process streams does your laboratory have a capability to analyze? Please check all that apply
• Oil sands ore body (core samples, mine)
• Mature Fine Tailings (MFT)
• Fluid Fine Tailings (FFT)
• Thin Fine Tailings (TFT)
• Composite Tailings (CT)
• Froth
• Other (please specify below)
Method Summary on the next page presents the five different steps of the proposed fines measurement standard method for the Inter Laboratory Study (ILS). Each step of 1 to 5 indicates 1 of 2 procedures that can be used to accomplish the task specified for a given step.
One of these procedures, or both, if company prefers and if sample size allows, may be used in the ILS. A specific ASTM D422 option is not provided, however, a similar method is described where #325 sieve can be used but with different dispersion methodology.
Please note that "Comments or Questions" textboxs further in this Survry related to each step and referenced to the corresponding section of the Method do not have any limitations on number of characters and lines to be entered. "Comments/Questions" maybe scrolled down if multiple lines of text are entered.
Please return the completed Survey to [email protected]
4. Contact e-mail for ILS
COSIA Pre Inter-Laboratory Study Survey Please return the completed Survey to [email protected]
Phone # (Contact Person for Inter-Laboratory Study (ILS))
2.
COSIA Fines Measurement Working Group: 2014 Lab Survey Page 1 of 6
Method Summary( numbers refer to numbered sectons in
the Method description)
10.1-A: DEAN & STARK EXTRACTION
10.1-B: COLD SOLVENT WASH
10.2-A: DISAGGREGATION BY HAMMER MILL
10.2-B DISAGGREGATION WITH MORTAR AND PESTLE
10.3-A: STATIC RIFFLE DIVIDER
10.3-B ROTARY DIVIDER OR SPIN RIFFLER
10.4-A DISPERSION BY BOILING WITH SHMP
10.4-B SONICATION WITH IMMERSION PROBE
10.5-A LASER DIFFRACTION 10.5-B SIEVE
10.1 SAMPLE CLEANING
10.2 SAMPLE DISAGGERGATION
10.3 SUB SAMPLING
10.4 SAMPLE DISPERSION
10.5 SAMPLE MEASUREMENT
COSIA Fines Measurement Working Group: 2014 Lab Survey Page 2 of 6
Step 1. SAMPLE CLEANING
Refer to Sample Cleaning section 10.1 of the Method:
6. What procedure(s) will your laboratory choose for sample cleaning?
Dean Stark Cold Wash
7. Does your laboratory need to engage 3rd party for Sample Cleaning?
Yes No
8. Please provide feedback or any questions regarding Cleaning step of the Method:
Step 2. SAMPLE DISAGGREGATION
Refer to Sample Disaggregation section 10.2 of the Method:
9. What method(s) will your laboratory choose for sample disaggregation?
Hammer Mill Mortar&Pestle
10. If Hammer Mill is chosen, please provide technical characteristics:
Motor power, W
Rotating speeds, rpm
No Fitted with screen/sieve Yes
Sieve size, mm
Hammer-grinding stator (not blade-grinding stator) Yes No
Hammer-rotor (not blade-grinding rotor) Yes No
Hopper volume, mL
Refer to Hammer Mill specifications 10.2-A-1 for guidance on technical characteristics
11. Please provide feedback or any questions regarding Disaggregation step of the Method
COSIA Fines Measurement Working Group: 2014 Lab Survey Page 3 of 6
Step 3. SUB SAMPLING
Refer to Sub-Sampling section 10.3 of the Method:
11. What metod(s) is chosen for subsampling?
Static Riffle Spin Riffle
12. If Static Riffle is chosen, does it meet the specifications ? Yes No
13. If no, please provide details of the difference
14. If Spin Riffle is chosen: a. What is the vibrational amplitude?
b. How many fractions does itmake?
15. Please provide feedback or any questions regarding Subsampling step of the Method
Step 4. DISPERSION
Refer to Dispersion section 10.4 of the Method:
16. What procedure(s) will be chosen for dispersion?
Boiling Sonication
17. If Sonication is chosen, does it meet equipment specifications? Yes No
18. If no, please provide the details of the difference
c. What is the max load intothe main hopper?
d. What is the rotationalspeed?
COSIA Fines Measurement Working Group: 2014 Lab Survey Page 4 of 6
19. Please provide feedback or any questions regarding Dispersion step of the Method
Step 5. MEASUREMENT
Refer to Measurement section 10.5 of the Method for the description
20. What procedure(s) is chosen for sample measurement?
Laser Wet Sieve
Diffraction
21. Please provide feedback or any questions regarding Measurement step of the Method
22. Please provide any other comments or questions regarding the Method
23. For ILS planning, please specify which path (numbered #1- 16 on the next page) your lab will follow for each of
the sample types selected. There is no limitation on the number of options to be selected.
COSIA Fines Measurement Working Group: 2014 Lab Survey Page 5 of 6
24. Please indicate if your lab agrees to participate in ILS for the proposed Standard Method
Yes No
25. If “No” indicated in question 24 above, please provide below what would need to be modified to allow your laboratory toparticipate
a. Method (details)
b. Logistical/commercial/administrative
path # Disaggregation Subsampling Dispersion Measurement
path selected for
oil sand sample
path selected for MFT
1 Hammer mill static riffle Boiling Laser diffraction
2 Hammer mill spin riffle Boiling Laser diffraction
3 Hammer mill static riffle Boiling Wet Sieve
4 Hammer mill spin riffle Boiling Wet Sieve
5 Mortar & pestle static riffle Boiling Laser diffraction
6 Mortar & pestle spin riffle Boiling Laser diffraction
7 Mortar & pestle static riffle Boiling Wet Sieve
8 Mortar & pestle spin riffle Boiling Wet Sieve
9 Hammer mill static riffle Sonication Laser diffraction
10 Hammer mill spin riffle Sonication Laser diffraction
11 Hammer mill static riffle Sonication Wet Sieve
12 Hammer mill spin riffle Sonication Wet Sieve
13 Mortar & pestle static riffle Sonication Laser diffraction
14 Mortar & pestle spin riffle Sonication Laser diffraction
15 Mortar & pestle static riffle Sonication Wet Sieve
16 Mortar & pestle spin riffle Sonication Wet Sieve
COSIA Fines Measurement Working Group: 2014 Lab Survey Page 6 of 6