Upload
iman
View
71
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Cory Vardaman Project Manager Joe Clark Assistant Manager Lisa Albanese GIS Technician, Web Master Ethan Roberts GIS Analyst, Graphics Design. Warrant Visualization and Mapping : Improved Criminal Information Management Using GIS. Prepared for the New Braunfels Police Department in - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
╬ Cory Vardaman
Project Manager
╬ Joe Clark
Assistant Manager
╬ Lisa Albanese
GIS Technician, Web Master
╬ Ethan Roberts
GIS Analyst, Graphics Design
Warrant Visualization and Mapping:
Improved Criminal Information Management Using GIS
Prepared for the New Braunfels Police Department in
response to the Request for Proposal
Summary
The Problem: Un-served warrants
• Offenders “getting away with it”
• Increased administrative backlog”
• Uncollected revenue
The Answer:
• GIS can manage and visualize information
• Provides a useful tool to enhance law enforcement altogether
Purpose
What will Apache Tracker Geospatial do for the NBPD?
• Design a tool to map active warrants
• Graphically display warrants
• Increase efficiency
Scope: New Braunfels ETJ
Why? …The ETJ is the only area NBPD can serve warrants
Data
Data File type SourceAddress Points Shapefile CNB
Center Line Shapefile CNB
Surface Shapefile CNB
Streams/Water Shapefile CNB
Building Footprints Shapefile CNB
Parcels Shapefile CNB
Police Districts Shapefile CNB
Extra Territorial Jurisdiction
Shapefile CNB
Warrant Table .XLS Table NBPD
Methodology
Phase I: Data Preparation/ File Conversion
Phase II: Basic Warrant Tool Development
Phase III: Advanced Tool Construction
Phase IV: Tool Proofing and Refinement
Phase I: Data Preparation
CRIMES Database
Municipal Court Multiple Warrant Data
Phase I: Data Preparation / File Conversion
Task: Obtain and prepare warrant attributes for geocoding
How: Active Warrant File (AWC) Conversion
Goal: Create reference data
BatchingFor ease of data conversion, a sample of active warrants and its attributes will be extracted from the CRIMES warrants database in a tabular spreadsheet .xls. This data will be used as reference data in the geocoding model.
Click to edit the outline text format Second Outline Level
Third Outline Level
Fourth Outline Level
Fifth Outline Level
Sixth Outline Level
Seventh Outline Level
Eighth Outline Level
Ninth Outline LevelClick to edit Master text styles
Second level
Third level
Fourth level
Fifth level
Phase II: Basic Warrant Tool Development
• Task: Match warrant address field to geographic address.
• How: Geocode
Reference Data + Address layers = Address Locator
Address Locator Style
Primary Layer – Point Address Data
Secondary Layer – Street Data to catch unmatched addresses.
• Goal: Create warrant file (point file) address locator as a resource.
Click to edit the outline text format Second Outline Level
Third Outline Level
Fourth Outline Level
Fifth Outline Level
Sixth Outline Level
Seventh Outline Level
Eighth Outline Level
Ninth Outline LevelClick to edit Master text styles
Second level
Third level
Fourth level
Fifth level
Phase III: Advanced Tool Construction
Task: Geocoded warrant file implemented with additional map layers to create:
• File geodatabase
• Map document
Reference map design
How: The selected map layers and the geocoded warrant file will be inputted into a file geodatabase that can be employed into the NBPD server along with the reference ready map document.
Goal: Complete tool
Click to edit the outline text format Second Outline
Level Third Outline
LevelFourth Outline Level Fifth Outline Level
Sixth Outline Level
Seventh Outline Level
Eighth Outline Level
Ninth Outline LevelClick to edit Master text styles
Second level
Third level
Fourth level
Fifth level
Click to edit the outline text format Second Outline
Level Third Outline
LevelFourth Outline Level Fifth Outline Level
Sixth Outline Level
Seventh Outline Level
Eighth Outline Level
Ninth Outline LevelClick to edit Master text styles
Second level
Third level
Fourth level
Fifth level
Phase IV: Tool Proofing and Refinement
Tasks: Implementation, testing, troubleshootingAdditional project considerations (optional)
How: Test run with at Texas State. Test run at Police Department.
Warrant model will be installed within the NBPD server through Mike Parma, GIS Coordinator for New Braunfels. He requests the geoprocessing tool output in geodatabase format configurable to their ESRI servers.
Goal: Satisfactory results in testing and troubleshooting.
Additional Tools
Analysis Purposes
• Dispatchers and Administrative support expressed interest in using the model for analysis purposes such as mapping hot spots or high density locations.
If time permits, the group has the option to work on additional tools:
Querying
Hot Spot Management
• Officers expressed interest in the ability to query warrant data to optimize their search based on criteria they feel is important. Mr. Parmer indicated web mapping applications, such as querying, is task he may have to build into the model in the future.
Implications
Supporting the New Braunfels Police Department in
effectively serving outstanding warrants by:
• providing a tool that dispatchers will use to produce maps
• providing officers a graphic visualization of outstanding warrants
• offering other important updated data including…
1. the number of warrant(s)
2. fine amount
3. age of warrant(s)
4. and any other information contained in the CRIMES warrant records
Timeline
Phase I: Data Preparation/Collection
• .XML warrant file extraction and cleaning
• CRIMES Dispatch system “batching”
• Testing of converted files
• Data collection
Phase II: Basic Warrant Development Tool
• Address locator referencing (standardized address)
• Warrant file geocoding
• Additional refinement
Phase III: Advanced Tool Construction
• Geocoded warrant file implementation
• Creation of file geodatabase and map document
• Model streamlining
• Reference map design
Phase IV: Tool Proofing and Refinement
Model enhancement with data recycling
Warrant model installed and tested on NBPD
server
Troubleshooting
Additional project considerations
Mon Tue Wed Thur Fri Sat Sun
27 28 29 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31 1
Mon Tue Wed Thur Fri Sat Sun
30 31 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22Proposal Presentation
23 24 25 26
27 28 29 1 2 3 4
Mon Tue Wed Thur Fri Sat Sun
26 27 28 29 30 31 1
2 Progress
Report
3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 27 27 28 29
30
1 2 3 4 5 6
Mon Tue Wed Thur Fri Sat Sun
30 1 2 3 4Final Report
5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31 1 2 3
February
March
April
May
1
2
4
56
7
89
10
11
3
Timeline
Phase I: Data Preparation/Collection
• .XML warrant file extraction and cleaning
• CRIMES Dispatch system “batching”
• Testing of converted files
• Data collection
Phase II: Basic Warrant Development Tool
• Address locator referencing (standardized address)
• Warrant file geocoding
• Additional refinement
Phase III: Advanced Tool Construction
• Geocoded warrant file implementation
• Creation of file geodatabase and map document
• Model streamlining
• Reference map design
Phase IV: Tool Proofing and Refinement
Model enhancement with data recycling
Warrant model installed and tested on NBPD
server
Troubleshooting
Additional project considerations
Mon Tue Wed Thur Fri Sat Sun
27 28 29 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31 1
Mon Tue Wed Thur Fri Sat Sun
30 31 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22Proposal Presentation
23 24 25 26
27 28 29 1 2 3 4
Mon Tue Wed Thur Fri Sat Sun
26 27 28 29 30 31 1
2 Progress
Report
3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 27 27 28 29
30
1 2 3 4 5 6
Mon Tue Wed Thur Fri Sat Sun
30 1 2 3 4Final Report
5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31 1 2 3
February
March
April
May
1
2
4
56
7
89
10
11
3
Timeline
Phase I: Data Preperation/Collection
• .XML warrant file extraction and cleaning
• CRIMES Dispatch system “batching”
• Testing of converted files
• Data collection
Phase II: Basic Warrant Development Tool
• Address locator referencing (standardized address)
• Warrant file geocoding
• Additional refinement
Phase III: Advanced Tool Construction
• Geocoded warrant file implementation
• Creation of file geodatabase and map document
• Model streamlining
• Reference map design
Phase IV: Tool Proofing and Refinement
Model enhancement with data recycling
Warrant model installed and tested on NBPD
server
Troubleshooting
Additional project considerations
Mon Tue Wed Thur Fri Sat Sun
27 28 29 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31 1
Mon Tue Wed Thur Fri Sat Sun
30 31 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22Proposal Presentation
23 24 25 26
27 28 29 1 2 3 4
Mon Tue Wed Thur Fri Sat Sun
26 27 28 29 30 31 1
2 Progress
Report
3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 27 27 28 29
30
1 2 3 4 5 6
Mon Tue Wed Thur Fri Sat Sun
30 1 2 3 4Final Report
5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31 1 2 3
February
March
April
May
1
2
4
56
7
89
10
11
3
Timeline
Phase I: Data Preperation/Collection
• .XML warrant file extraction and cleaning
• CRIMES Dispatch system “batching”
• Testing of converted files
• Data collection
Phase II: Basic Warrant Development Tool
• Address locator referencing (standardized address)
• Warrant file geocoding
• Additional refinement
Phase III: Advanced Tool Construction
• Geocoded warrant file implementation
• Creation of file geodatabase and map document
• Model streamlining
• Reference map design
Phase IV: Tool Proofing and Refinement
Model enhancement with data recycling
Warrant model installed and tested on NBPD
server
Troubleshooting
Additional project considerations
Mon Tue Wed Thur Fri Sat Sun
27 28 29 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31 1
Mon Tue Wed Thur Fri Sat Sun
30 31 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22Proposal Presentation
23 24 25 26
27 28 29 1 2 3 4
Mon Tue Wed Thur Fri Sat Sun
26 27 28 29 30 31 1
2 Progress
Report
3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 27 27 28 29
30
1 2 3 4 5 6
Mon Tue Wed Thur Fri Sat Sun
30 1 2 3 4Final Report
5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31 1 2 3
February
March
April
May
1
2
4
56
7
89
10
11
3
Timeline
Phase I: Data Preperation/Collection
• .XML warrant file extraction and cleaning
• CRIMES Dispatch system “batching”
• Testing of converted files
• Data collection
Phase II: Basic Warrant Development Tool
• Address locator referencing (standardized address)
• Warrant file geocoding
• Additional refinement
Phase III: Advanced Tool Construction
• Geocoded warrant file implementation
• Creation of file geodatabase and map document
• Model streamlining
• Reference map design
Phase IV: Tool Proofing and Refinement
Model enhancement with data recycling
Warrant model installed and tested on NBPD
server
Troubleshooting
Additional project considerations
Mon Tue Wed Thur Fri Sat Sun
27 28 29 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31 1
Mon Tue Wed Thur Fri Sat Sun
30 31 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22Proposal Presentation
23 24 25 26
27 28 29 1 2 3 4
Mon Tue Wed Thur Fri Sat Sun
26 27 28 29 30 31 1
2 Progress
Report
3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 27 27 28 29
30
1 2 3 4 5 6
Mon Tue Wed Thur Fri Sat Sun
30 1 2 3 4Final Report
5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31 1 2 3
February
March
April
May
1
2
4
56
7
89
10
11
3
Project Budget: Development
Development
Depreciation
Supplies/Maintenance
Licensing/Software
Travel Expenses
400 Total Hours11 Weeks
$9,400
60%
Project Budget: Licensing/Software
Development
Depreciation
Supplies/Maintenance
Licensing/Software
Travel Expenses
$5208
34%
Industry Leading ESRI ArcGIS PackageUtilized by experienced individualsProduces a quality product targeted for other licensees
Project Budget: Subsidiary Expenses
Development
Depreciation
Supplies/Maintenance
Licensing/Software
Travel Expenses
$4403%
$270.832%
$1201%
Total: $15,439.16
Final Deliverables► Warrant Tool and Geodatabase*
► Final Report (Hard Copy)
► Display Poster
► Electronic Data Copy (CD Format)
• Additional Shapefiles
• Metadata
• Final Report
• Power Point Presentation
• Manuals
• Readme File
Note: All electronic deliverables will undergo format compatibility
Conclusions
• Will be a user friendly tool that can be easily updated
• Assist with “in the field time management”
• Enhance planning operations
• Help provide a foundation for further GIS integration
Questions…
Point of Contact: Ethan Roberts…………..…[email protected]