56
Committed To Improvement Technologies Champion Evaluation of Corrosion Evaluation of Corrosion Inhibitors Inhibitors Champion Technologies Houston, TX

Corrosion Inhibitor Evaluation

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

corrosion

Citation preview

  • Evaluation of Corrosion Inhibitors

    Champion Technologies

    Houston, TX

  • Introduction

    Oilfield CorrosionParameters Affecting CorrosionCorrosion InhibitionInhibitor Evaluation
  • Parameters Affecting Corrosion

    PressureTemperatureDissolved GasesBrine CompositionFlow VelocityOil/Water Ratios
  • Corrosion Inhibition

    MechanismClassification

    Anodic / Cathodic / Mixed

    Organic / Inorganic

    Film Forming

  • Treating Methods

    Wells

    Periodic Batch

    Continuous

  • Treating Methods

    Pipelines

    Periodic Batch

    Continuous

  • Inhibitor Evaluation

    Laboratory TechniquesField Trial
  • Laboratory Techniques

    Wheel TestRotating Cylinder Electrode TestFlow Loop TestRotating Coupons Autoclave TestJet Impingement Test Apparatus
  • Wheel Test Procedures

    Constant Concentration TestFilm Persistency TestPartition Wheel Test
  • 146.bin
  • 147.bin
  • Constant Concentration Test

    Simulates Continuous InjectionEvaluation Chemical EffectivenessUsed For More Corrosive Situation
  • Film Persistency Test

    Simulates Batch ApplicationsEvaluates Inhibitor Film PersistencyUsed For Less Corrosive Situations
  • Partition Test

    Simulates Continuous InjectionEvaluates Partitioning CapabilitiesUsed For Wet Gas PipelinesUsed For Low Velocity Pipelines
  • Constant Concentration Wheel Test Procedure

    Chemical Dispensed in Fluids

    Coupon Inserted

    Wheel Oven at Temperature

    Wheel Rotation Started

    Test Fluids Sparged

    Test Vessels Assembled

  • Coupon Cleaning Procedure

    Rinse With XyleneClean With Inhibited HClRinse With WaterScrub With Steel Wool PadRinse With IPADry & Weigh
  • Calculations

    Weight Loss, W =

    Blank Wt. Loss - Inhibited Wt. Loss

    % Protection =

    (Weight Loss * 100) / Blank Wt. Loss

    Corrosion Rate (mpy) =

    W = weight loss (mg)

    D = Density (g/cm3)

    A = Area (inch2)

    T = Exposure time (hours)

    534 * w

    D * A * T

  • Constant Concentration Wheel Test Result

    CO2/CH4 : 0.8/16.7 MPa (116 / 2422 psi), 110C

    10% Kerosene, 90% Brine

  • Film Persistency Test Procedure

    Film Coupon

    Rinse Coupon

    Start Test

    Retrieve Coupon

  • Film Persistency Wheel Test

    CO2/CH4 : 0.8/9.0 MPa (116 / 1305 psi), 160C

    5% Kerosene, 95% Brine

  • Partition Wheel Test

    Dispense Inhibitor In Fluids

    Leave Undisturbed

    Siphon Water

    Start Test

    Retrieve Coupon

  • Wheel Test Advantages

    Simple TestHigh TemperaturesHigh PressuresSweet/Sour TestScreening of Inhibitor PossibleLow Pressure

    15 psia

    180F (82 C)

    30 rpm

    High Pressure

    20,000 psia

    400F (204 C)

    30 rpm

  • Wheel Test Disadvantages

    No Velocity EffectsWeight Loss OnlyTime Dependency of Performance
  • Flow Hydrodynamics - Pipe Flow

    Pipe Flow:

    wall shear stress value for an isothermal

    parallel pipe flow is given by

    where

    =

    density of fluid (Kg/m3)

    f =

    friction factor

    v =

    fluid flow velocity (m/s)

    2

    2

    1

    v

    f

    r

    t

    =

    F comes from Moody Diagrams.

  • RCE Measurement Techniques

    Weight Loss Linear Polarization Resistance (LPR)EISECN
  • RCE Test Apparatus

    Rotating Cylinder

    Electrode

    Heater

    Thermocouple

    Working Electrode

    Reference Electrode

    Auxiliary Electrode

    Gas Purge

    Tube

    RCE Motor

  • RCE Test Procedures

    Constant Concentration TestPartition TestFilm Persistency TestBubble Test
  • Bubble Test

    Simulates Continuous InjectionLow Flow SituationsEvaluates Inhibitor Ability To Migrate To The Water Phase
  • Constant Concentration RCE Test

    Set Up ApparatusFill Fluids In Desired RatioBegin Rotation & Set TemperatureMeasure Blank Corrosion RatesInject ChemicalMeasure Inhibited Corrosion Rates
  • Constant Concentration RCE Test

    CO2 Sparge, 72 C, 5000 RPM

    10% Kerosene, 90% Brine

    20 PPM

  • RCE Partitioning and Film Persistency Tests

    Similar To Wheel Test ProcedureContinuous Monitoring Using LPR
  • RCE Partition Test

    CO2 Sparge, 72 C, 3000 RPM

    10% Kerosene, 90% Brine

  • RCE Film Persistency Test

    CO2 Sparge, 72 C, 3000 RPM

    5% Kerosene, 95% Brine

  • RCE Bubble Test Procedure

    Fill Brine and Bubble CO2Immerse ElectrodesAdd Hydrocarbon LiquidMeasure Blank Corrosion RatesInject InhibitorMeasure Inhibited Corrosion Rates
  • RCE Bubble Test

    CO2 Sparge, 72 C

    10% Kerosene, 90% Brine

    Inject Inhibitor

  • Advantages of RCE Tests

    Easy To Set UpRelatively Lower CostWeight Loss & LPR CapabilitiesVarious Situations SimulatedScreening Of Chemicals PossibleVelocity Effects Tested
  • Disadvantages Of RCEs

    Limited Temperature RangeLimited Pressure RangeNot Suited For High Shear ApplicationsTemperature

    180F (82 C)

    Pressure

    15 psia

    Velocity

    0-4 ft/sec (1.3 m/s @ 2000 rpm)

    0-2 Pa Shear Stress

  • Flow Loop Tests

    Constant ConcentrationWeight LossLPR Electrochemical Noise
  • Flow Loop Test Apparatus

    .

    .

    RE

    WE

    CE

    Electrochemical

    Cell

    Pump

    Mass Flow

    Meter

    Heating

    Element

    Autoclave

    Brine

    Tank

    Hydrocarbon

    Tank

    N

    2

    /CO

    2

    N

    2

    /CO

    2

    N

    2

    CO

    2

    Thermowell

  • Electrochemical Corrosion Cell

    Coupon 1

    Coupon 2

    Coupon 3

  • Flow Loop Test Procedure

    Sparge FluidsFill System In Desired RatioHeat To TemperatureStart Blank Corrosion TestInject ChemicalObserve Effect On Corrosion Rates
  • Flow Loop Test Result

    5

    10

    15

    20

    CO2/N2 : 0.3/6.7 MPa (44 / 972 psi), 72 C, 7 m/s

    100 ppm

    JRN-259

  • Flow Loop Advantages

    High PressuresHigh TemperaturesWeight Loss, LPR & ECN CapabilitiesHigh VelocitiesSweet Or Sour TestsTemperature

    212F (100 C) max.

    Pressure

    2000 psia (14 MPa)

    Velocity

    20 ft/s (6 m/s)

    300 Pa Shear Stress

  • Flow Loop Disadvantages

    Costly EquipmentLabor IntensiveScreening Of Chemicals Undesirable
  • Rotating Coupon Autoclave Test

    Constant ConcentrationPartition
  • RCA Test Apparatus

    .

    .

    Motor

    Gas In

    Thermowell

    Teflon End Cap

    Teflon End Cap

    Rotating Cylinder Coupons (4)

    Drain Port

    Heating

    Element

    Rupture

    Disk

    Gas Out

    Magnetic Stirring

    Attachment

  • RCA & Flow Loop Test Results

    567

    584

    21

    22

    15

    19

    13

    18

    14

    21

    40

    48

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    Corrosion Rate (mpy)

    Blank

    A

    B

    C

    D

    E

    Corrosion Inhibitor

    1 st Data Series: RCA w/ 25 ppm inhibitor

    2nd Data Series: FL w/ 75 ppm inhibitor

  • Advantages Of Autoclave

    High PressuresHigh TemperaturesHigh Shear ValuesSweet Or Sour TestsTemperature

    450F (212 C) max.

    Pressure

    5000 psia (34 MPa)

    Velocity

    0-54 ft/sec (16.5 m/s)

    0-232 Pa Shear Stress

  • Disadvantages Of Autoclave

    Relatively Costly EquipmentWeight Loss Measurements OnlyScreening Of Chemicals Undesirable
  • Selection Of Corrosion Inhibitor

    Pour PointCompatibilityFoaming TendencyEnvironmental Concerns
  • Conclusions

    Diagnose ProblemState Of The Art Corrosion Testing

    Wheel Test

    RCE Test

    Flow Loop Test

    Autoclave Test

    Jet Impingement Electrode-990 Pa

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    350

    400

    02356891112181921222425

    TIME (HR)

    CORROSION RATE (mils/yr)

    R67, 10%

    R67, 25%

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    013456891011131415

    TIME (HR)

    CORROSION RATE (mils/yr)

    RN-247 400 PPM

    RN-247 600 PPM

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    012345679101213151618

    TIME (HR)

    CORROSION RATE (mils/yr)

    AN2-29

    RN-246

    RU-223

    RN-234

    RU-205

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    0235689

    11121415

    TIME (HR)

    CORROSION RATE (mils/yr)

    RN-247 400 PPM

    RN-247 600 PPM

    0

    200

    400

    600

    800

    1000

    1200

    1400

    Time (HR)

    Corrosion Rate (mils/yr)

    LPR Corrosion

    Wt. Loss

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    0123456791012131516

    TIME (HRS)

    CORROSION RATE (mils/yr)

    RN-234

    RU-223

    AN2-29

    RU-205

    RN-246

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    % Protection

    RN-178RN-206

    Chemical Evaluated

    78

    80

    82

    84

    86

    88

    90

    92

    % Protection

    R-68R-2302R-2394

    Chemical Evaluated