NAL PROPOSAL No 36

Correspondent R A Carrigan Jr Experimental Facilities National Accelerator Lab PO Box 500 Batavia Ill

FTSCommercial 312-231-6600 Ext 457

A Proposal To Study Small Angle p-p Scattering

At Very High Energies

D Gross H Jostlein A Melissinos L Purser

University of Rochester

R A Carrigan Jr J Sculli R Yamada T Yamanouchi National Accelerator Laboratory

R L Cool Rockefeller University

June 15 1970

A IJ HOPOSAL TC) STUDY SJvlALJL ANGLE p--p SCATlEHING

AT VEHY IHGII ENEIlGIES

June 15 1970

D Gross I-I Jostlein f ]Vlclissinos~ K University of Hochester

Purser

R A Carrigan Jr J Scul1i R Yanlada 1 National Accelerator Laboratory

Yamanouchi

R L Rockefelle r

Cool Univers ity

ABST

--1Sp-p SC3~te

a thin ~o Ll 3nc~ a

28-3 _ -leltS -3r~e ()(138(i

[lee

c) tne

te lJe is 2tlf)

dlta zJer the entire erle re

Est ene ach~eed by N--L 12

Toted beaLl intnsities of 1011 to 10 proLons

e J is re~3 unde

June 1971

R A Car

--

L

Ve jJ to rJ(

If 1~

cl is eel on the nl eaSUY2n1ent of

an 1J otons a in

f injcron 01 le-s) can also be us(d r~ i CLtshy ~

C ~

1 is

fo ~lt~

CL

r-r--- bull ~

J

jhe rr- ~Yl ur he

1 j t T to 1L the c1c()1 di

a cLiol1 of ejJ(= rcrneDtS V~J] coYel 111

O OJ lt t lt O~ 1

the Ion 0 t

b)

coulornb

the

bu~ - ( (o~~ u G 1 _ v

---

shy

-4shy

Inodel if only a single t ectory is exchanged the slope is expected to

increase as In s In Fig 1 VO sIlo the latest results fronl the Serpukhov

)middot11- 1expcrunenL Vinen seern to support t 1e Hegge model

A knovvledge of this slope at NAL energies is of great interest since

many theoretical rnodels predict an aSYlYlptotic lirnit rather than continued

Shrinkage Furthernlore if ve extrapolate linearly to the ene region

of 200 500 OeV the existing data suggest a slope higher than 13 (GcV c)-

This va1ue would 1 than the slope for pp diffraction measured at

12 GcVc and r middotv-hich the diffraction patte rn is known to (anti _

shrink) Thus if the diffraction for pp and are to haTle a COlnnlon

lhnit as E -gt OJ either the rate of change of the pp slope must decrease at

t or DO slone Inust J ~ J its behavior and begin toshrink

thereIore rtant s nlay occur in the

ene

) in tIle context of the Re model the s

s is g re reduced excep EoI those

Eo -3

0 IGe - c) 0 zero and )

c) in the valueis

corl [La be is

~el(nv 30 GeV On gerleral theore~jcal grounds s --shy

~e-P p w etc should not conribJteI

a unique deternlination of the slopegt 80 Oe

ClO

rne 2-8 re the of the nuclear scatte to an acc~lrscy

ene ie~ a de

ta_iled e vyill re +

2

e is obtained frorn rrletS~l r2nents of the Lnterference

itude is P real) and the nuclear

A IJ HOPOSAL TC) STUDY SJvlALJL ANGLE p--p SCATlEHING

AT VEHY IHGII ENEIlGIES

June 15 1970

D Gross I-I Jostlein f ]Vlclissinos~ K University of Hochester

Purser

R A Carrigan Jr J Scul1i R Yanlada 1 National Accelerator Laboratory

Yamanouchi

R L Rockefelle r

Cool Univers ity

ABST

--1Sp-p SC3~te

a thin ~o Ll 3nc~ a

28-3 _ -leltS -3r~e ()(138(i

[lee

c) tne

te lJe is 2tlf)

dlta zJer the entire erle re

Est ene ach~eed by N--L 12

Toted beaLl intnsities of 1011 to 10 proLons

e J is re~3 unde

June 1971

R A Car

--

L

Ve jJ to rJ(

If 1~

cl is eel on the nl eaSUY2n1ent of

an 1J otons a in

f injcron 01 le-s) can also be us(d r~ i CLtshy ~

C ~

1 is

fo ~lt~

CL

r-r--- bull ~

J

jhe rr- ~Yl ur he

1 j t T to 1L the c1c()1 di

a cLiol1 of ejJ(= rcrneDtS V~J] coYel 111

O OJ lt t lt O~ 1

the Ion 0 t

b)

coulornb

the

bu~ - ( (o~~ u G 1 _ v

---

shy

-4shy

Inodel if only a single t ectory is exchanged the slope is expected to

increase as In s In Fig 1 VO sIlo the latest results fronl the Serpukhov

)middot11- 1expcrunenL Vinen seern to support t 1e Hegge model

A knovvledge of this slope at NAL energies is of great interest since

many theoretical rnodels predict an aSYlYlptotic lirnit rather than continued

Shrinkage Furthernlore if ve extrapolate linearly to the ene region

of 200 500 OeV the existing data suggest a slope higher than 13 (GcV c)-

This va1ue would 1 than the slope for pp diffraction measured at

12 GcVc and r middotv-hich the diffraction patte rn is known to (anti _

shrink) Thus if the diffraction for pp and are to haTle a COlnnlon

lhnit as E -gt OJ either the rate of change of the pp slope must decrease at

t or DO slone Inust J ~ J its behavior and begin toshrink

thereIore rtant s nlay occur in the

ene

) in tIle context of the Re model the s

s is g re reduced excep EoI those

Eo -3

0 IGe - c) 0 zero and )

c) in the valueis

corl [La be is

~el(nv 30 GeV On gerleral theore~jcal grounds s --shy

~e-P p w etc should not conribJteI

a unique deternlination of the slopegt 80 Oe

ClO

rne 2-8 re the of the nuclear scatte to an acc~lrscy

ene ie~ a de

ta_iled e vyill re +

2

e is obtained frorn rrletS~l r2nents of the Lnterference

itude is P real) and the nuclear

--

L

Ve jJ to rJ(

If 1~

cl is eel on the nl eaSUY2n1ent of

an 1J otons a in

f injcron 01 le-s) can also be us(d r~ i CLtshy ~

C ~

1 is

fo ~lt~

CL

r-r--- bull ~

J

jhe rr- ~Yl ur he

1 j t T to 1L the c1c()1 di

a cLiol1 of ejJ(= rcrneDtS V~J] coYel 111

O OJ lt t lt O~ 1

the Ion 0 t

b)

coulornb

the

bu~ - ( (o~~ u G 1 _ v

---

shy

-4shy

Inodel if only a single t ectory is exchanged the slope is expected to

increase as In s In Fig 1 VO sIlo the latest results fronl the Serpukhov

)middot11- 1expcrunenL Vinen seern to support t 1e Hegge model

A knovvledge of this slope at NAL energies is of great interest since

many theoretical rnodels predict an aSYlYlptotic lirnit rather than continued

Shrinkage Furthernlore if ve extrapolate linearly to the ene region

of 200 500 OeV the existing data suggest a slope higher than 13 (GcV c)-

This va1ue would 1 than the slope for pp diffraction measured at

12 GcVc and r middotv-hich the diffraction patte rn is known to (anti _

shrink) Thus if the diffraction for pp and are to haTle a COlnnlon

lhnit as E -gt OJ either the rate of change of the pp slope must decrease at

t or DO slone Inust J ~ J its behavior and begin toshrink

thereIore rtant s nlay occur in the

ene

) in tIle context of the Re model the s

s is g re reduced excep EoI those

Eo -3

0 IGe - c) 0 zero and )

c) in the valueis

corl [La be is

~el(nv 30 GeV On gerleral theore~jcal grounds s --shy

~e-P p w etc should not conribJteI

a unique deternlination of the slopegt 80 Oe

ClO

rne 2-8 re the of the nuclear scatte to an acc~lrscy

ene ie~ a de

ta_iled e vyill re +

2

e is obtained frorn rrletS~l r2nents of the Lnterference

itude is P real) and the nuclear

jhe rr- ~Yl ur he

1 j t T to 1L the c1c()1 di

a cLiol1 of ejJ(= rcrneDtS V~J] coYel 111

O OJ lt t lt O~ 1

the Ion 0 t

b)

coulornb

the

bu~ - ( (o~~ u G 1 _ v

---

shy

-4shy

Inodel if only a single t ectory is exchanged the slope is expected to

increase as In s In Fig 1 VO sIlo the latest results fronl the Serpukhov

)middot11- 1expcrunenL Vinen seern to support t 1e Hegge model

A knovvledge of this slope at NAL energies is of great interest since

many theoretical rnodels predict an aSYlYlptotic lirnit rather than continued

Shrinkage Furthernlore if ve extrapolate linearly to the ene region

of 200 500 OeV the existing data suggest a slope higher than 13 (GcV c)-

This va1ue would 1 than the slope for pp diffraction measured at

12 GcVc and r middotv-hich the diffraction patte rn is known to (anti _

shrink) Thus if the diffraction for pp and are to haTle a COlnnlon

lhnit as E -gt OJ either the rate of change of the pp slope must decrease at

t or DO slone Inust J ~ J its behavior and begin toshrink

thereIore rtant s nlay occur in the

ene

) in tIle context of the Re model the s

s is g re reduced excep EoI those

Eo -3

0 IGe - c) 0 zero and )

c) in the valueis

corl [La be is

~el(nv 30 GeV On gerleral theore~jcal grounds s --shy

~e-P p w etc should not conribJteI

a unique deternlination of the slopegt 80 Oe

ClO

rne 2-8 re the of the nuclear scatte to an acc~lrscy

ene ie~ a de

ta_iled e vyill re +

2

e is obtained frorn rrletS~l r2nents of the Lnterference

itude is P real) and the nuclear

-4shy

Inodel if only a single t ectory is exchanged the slope is expected to

increase as In s In Fig 1 VO sIlo the latest results fronl the Serpukhov

)middot11- 1expcrunenL Vinen seern to support t 1e Hegge model

A knovvledge of this slope at NAL energies is of great interest since

many theoretical rnodels predict an aSYlYlptotic lirnit rather than continued

Shrinkage Furthernlore if ve extrapolate linearly to the ene region

of 200 500 OeV the existing data suggest a slope higher than 13 (GcV c)-

This va1ue would 1 than the slope for pp diffraction measured at

12 GcVc and r middotv-hich the diffraction patte rn is known to (anti _

shrink) Thus if the diffraction for pp and are to haTle a COlnnlon

lhnit as E -gt OJ either the rate of change of the pp slope must decrease at

t or DO slone Inust J ~ J its behavior and begin toshrink

thereIore rtant s nlay occur in the

ene

) in tIle context of the Re model the s

s is g re reduced excep EoI those

Eo -3

0 IGe - c) 0 zero and )

c) in the valueis

corl [La be is

~el(nv 30 GeV On gerleral theore~jcal grounds s --shy

~e-P p w etc should not conribJteI

a unique deternlination of the slopegt 80 Oe

ClO

rne 2-8 re the of the nuclear scatte to an acc~lrscy

ene ie~ a de

ta_iled e vyill re +

2

e is obtained frorn rrletS~l r2nents of the Lnterference

itude is P real) and the nuclear

Due to final strlc interactions there is

a c hift in thE cU TC~ functions and this introduces a correla-

r of the coulornb nuclca rand

intc 1[e rCiJce [ID conLrj at 200 GcV c The ratio of rea1 to imagshy

2

]n

inj ry nL1 clear

-02

c If the existing iahles or a

to 20C Ge c a 1 i 11 one obtains Q O 02 ~rhich is

nea r 12

01 sh()uld be bct~~een 001 and 002 in

Go QUI 0 eS2olisi

--

52 ec state

t

2 2 In

x 2p

the lt rg in cjdcnt cncshy

18

q cohe reD cc even for

es could be used

proton into states of r

to supply 8n acklenduID dis

ens sibi1itic1 in ll1orc detail ill the near future

4

r e-=pe~irC1ent is in p resj Bt Se

hoy _-~ lLnit d to 70 Gc ]he C

s catte is

21i e l~middot~middot

lt 50 1VI2

p

Len 2

-7

r resolution red to ohbtin a recoil lllElSS resolution

L~rrl is In 6rn

9 (1 ) l Po

To resolve the ellstic peak one pion prodclction 6111

rnust be 1f In the worst case at 500 BeY c and tli

=- 01 )A an resolution of about 1 Dlrad vvouJd be required

is rnuch srClaller than this v2b_le

to obtain a In2SS resolution DIn is

CT = -----~- -----~ (2)

I D t l 0

t

-- ) -)

107)

n o

oThe eDC

t11c

UTon c- of jZ) bJe I

s One

In c

and ill OlnerE Ll In

thLD the claslic rccte

e1L 10(r enc zJl Th2 S

re301ved

at all en os

2

10

=

2 2 In

x 2p

the lt rg in cjdcnt cncshy

18

q cohe reD cc even for

es could be used

proton into states of r

to supply 8n acklenduID dis

ens sibi1itic1 in ll1orc detail ill the near future

4

r e-=pe~irC1ent is in p resj Bt Se

hoy _-~ lLnit d to 70 Gc ]he C

s catte is

21i e l~middot~middot

lt 50 1VI2

p

Len 2

-7

r resolution red to ohbtin a recoil lllElSS resolution

L~rrl is In 6rn

9 (1 ) l Po

To resolve the ellstic peak one pion prodclction 6111

rnust be 1f In the worst case at 500 BeY c and tli

=- 01 )A an resolution of about 1 Dlrad vvouJd be required

is rnuch srClaller than this v2b_le

to obtain a In2SS resolution DIn is

CT = -----~- -----~ (2)

I D t l 0

t

-- ) -)

107)

n o

oThe eDC

t11c

UTon c- of jZ) bJe I

s One

In c

and ill OlnerE Ll In

thLD the claslic rccte

e1L 10(r enc zJl Th2 S

re301ved

at all en os

2

10

=

-7

r resolution red to ohbtin a recoil lllElSS resolution

L~rrl is In 6rn

9 (1 ) l Po

To resolve the ellstic peak one pion prodclction 6111

rnust be 1f In the worst case at 500 BeY c and tli

=- 01 )A an resolution of about 1 Dlrad vvouJd be required

is rnuch srClaller than this v2b_le

to obtain a In2SS resolution DIn is

CT = -----~- -----~ (2)

I D t l 0

t

-- ) -)

107)

n o

oThe eDC

t11c

UTon c- of jZ) bJe I

s One

In c

and ill OlnerE Ll In

thLD the claslic rccte

e1L 10(r enc zJl Th2 S

re301ved

at all en os

2

10

=

n o

oThe eDC

t11c

UTon c- of jZ) bJe I

s One

In c

and ill OlnerE Ll In

thLD the claslic rccte

e1L 10(r enc zJl Th2 S

re301ved

at all en os

2

10

=

vvith rectclnglllar geornctry are rd 80 able Since the proton enter

the senf~iU e region pc to tbe drift direction it is not difficult

to obtain detecto rs hich p ent as ruuch as 2 CITl range to the incident

proton Sl1fficieni to covmiddote1 the entitc energy region envisioned in this

experinlcnt Jhese cletectors can be operated warm and

resolution is 1nor8 than for our purposes SOlne of

surface barrier detectors suffice in the lOltv a

ene rgy region (85 lt eR

9001-lt - sec Taole 1) and the rnore drifted silicon detectors will

be requj red only in the 1ast 2 - 3 ene bins ~rhe choice of detectors is

C rand llcL and dnal COll

ratiol1 vill deoend on the results of e cxperinlents Figures 78 and

7b s

COIU-EllSl - 5 of Table T Slrnnlcrt the location cerltyal t value Lt

ac ~netic energy of the recoil )rotoTJ

o dete rs~

ce 11

the in r8tiorl

ropriate duty C)FcJe C81 be

out of the bearl region

of the LLlclear 3catt r-

of 2 ve

and a relatIve e2se In aD30

lute depletion and radiation

s

-10shy

The hyd jet ta on the other hand has densiLi(~s of the order ~ 6

of 3 x 1U hyd rnolccules CHI ~~ and has a trricknes~ of 5 nun but is

free frcnn the carbon background Tbe jet is neces fo the interfer

cnce iC)rl nlCcl~~ll and will be ed for approxirn 250 msec

elu each T1CchirJ cycle 6

A hyd jcc 112 sed on the vork of Nikitin is being d and ltvill

be consttuc~cd by Hochester The iniUal pressure is 10 res and

the jet iE forraeci in a L8va] after nit en

it r5 thert a liqllid lleliuIll col

It is but a1so the e poundectlve

~r ith the j e 1 The 1at t e r is ell e

)1 the jetatron oscillaicil13 thus 2 diTect rCleasshy

u is reel e to

01shy jet

SO L2 (1

0 -1

L

(3)f

2 - bt e (4)

) 01 16 IT ~j

1 J shy

p 11t(~i(1 o

El 1)10

b ) of H o

s tt-rnsfe to the

tT

For fill 0) o stU cc r on

-) ~

1_0

-1 shy

] ) - 210 10 - OS CUti

of

05 x 10 x 208 1 (()( c

Fo 1 oJ

rnnnn 0 ~ ~- 111 S L1 e

to 1]111 cni S f10Hld no intcJshy

fc

Ve L1S conld b( left in cc

Y en~ s

IV TCTS

In ~ to

llS

pro

1

011e of tIl rof

T can he ph~ced in 8n

IDe

C2n Ishy

-15 shy

th c The riate

iTlfoTlllation exist c1nd

nat ana] E3hOlld be straightforvard

sine red

3 J

1C111en18 are rop Hlet the

F 1) r the ren 0 r e J 2 - 3 a c1 d i t ionaJ s taU

v-in the grol~p

1870 and

vre aCE C(~middot

prOC2C

( r t ~~ 1 J~l

- _ _---- shy

6 V (~V x

it f f i I 1(middot 1 ~ () )01 in (~cV Eve1t81 0 esI

I) ) +

I(iii (I I ( ( I V () 1 t~ V [ 50 200 300

_-- - -- ------------shy-------------~---------

i lpn o )l lIh II 215

(01)middot11 u UU(i J gt )

1 ~ ) 1 fnI L I P (HI fO)U~ J 10 40 A JV

~ ( ) it) U (J( l i II ~

r- U (jiU I bull i il 1 ~

r

I l (J J ~ OI)O ~~ ] U~ 20 gO 200 330 i-

co

~~ ~~ o () ~ I OUOlg I 1 ~~ i~

i) ) ) O () l ~) Ooo~ J 1middot1 B

1 ) O 1 (l~ 00024 f) -J Ij H

O 1~~o o oo~n d J not 35 1L10 350 500

-------_-----------__---__ ___--- -___---- _-_

detector w h

- middot~t UO C~l~ V Li tiou rate h)drogen j2tjmiddotoxiniatetv

lt)

N cl t~ i j 0 n At t 2 x 10-)coHuulh at I III c l~ar C lOSH S (tee upproximately equal

II I) i UIHe HI Hue to CCHlnLer ((~ntef (11i f))

-17

5~__~l Phys Letters 30B 274 (1969)

3 190 (lDf)8)

Rev Letters 1 857 (1967)

L Stodo] Hev 144 1145 (1966)

G Bell tUrd et a1 Nucl ~ 79 609 (1966)

5 S c- ee lor e S II Be2-nlan and S D DreJ1 Phys Rev 133

791 (196 ) also )- N and J I-los en l nive of Rocheste r

Jet

0 I ~u

0middot j i~

L

~ ] TIle p P cIii ion

of crt

N (13

L

Fj fhc C~)

ener

) bull oj

gtlcEl ie

_ 0)

OJ

- -

()

C)

=middotmiddot0 (] _

gt

t

-~ L~J

LU

r c

fIIth

rmiddot f~

11 shy1

gt

0

C

rJ I~

CL -w

1

-~

-r- ~~

-I_J

- ii

-

-- C~

fJ

w)

o

i_

j

rshyr L~i

2 () G FJrotons

- -- (N lJ cIQ0 r~- Co U i 0 rii b )

middot (r 1 2-- f In j2 Ie)

o

0

()

~v

g

tt) 0

c

t)

~-

utJ

FE

shygt

0

()

c

C) ~~

C)

o~

0 C1

(J

~~

0

E

C

CJ 1~

J

41 C

l

(D

1

)

~

0 (lJ

(1 c C

C ~

o C

c) C~

t[)

- gt

c

-shy ~~ -1-shy

C)

~

iI

0 (J

I

__ 0 -shy

o

( 1 C~ ~

H

j~)

~

o

C)

61

l

f

CJ-

i

1

I I 1

L

1

1 J

I j

i

f i-i1 I

i ~

1 1

~

i l

J L I I

JII I

= -~~-~ bull-~~~~~) ~ u-)

nlnC

j~ I

Fig 6

E1 r ti I It 2 tq~ pound~ Jj ( J C S fro rn - fn

Channel Nurnber

c)L)

~) i

I

-1 -~

~ ]

)

-10shy

The hyd jet ta on the other hand has densiLi(~s of the order ~ 6

of 3 x 1U hyd rnolccules CHI ~~ and has a trricknes~ of 5 nun but is

free frcnn the carbon background Tbe jet is neces fo the interfer

cnce iC)rl nlCcl~~ll and will be ed for approxirn 250 msec

elu each T1CchirJ cycle 6

A hyd jcc 112 sed on the vork of Nikitin is being d and ltvill

be consttuc~cd by Hochester The iniUal pressure is 10 res and

the jet iE forraeci in a L8va] after nit en

it r5 thert a liqllid lleliuIll col

It is but a1so the e poundectlve

~r ith the j e 1 The 1at t e r is ell e

)1 the jetatron oscillaicil13 thus 2 diTect rCleasshy

u is reel e to

01shy jet

SO L2 (1

0 -1

L

(3)f

2 - bt e (4)

) 01 16 IT ~j

1 J shy

p 11t(~i(1 o

El 1)10

b ) of H o

s tt-rnsfe to the

tT

For fill 0) o stU cc r on

-) ~

1_0

-1 shy

] ) - 210 10 - OS CUti

of

05 x 10 x 208 1 (()( c

Fo 1 oJ

rnnnn 0 ~ ~- 111 S L1 e

to 1]111 cni S f10Hld no intcJshy

fc

Ve L1S conld b( left in cc

Y en~ s

IV TCTS

In ~ to

llS

pro

1

011e of tIl rof

T can he ph~ced in 8n

IDe

C2n Ishy

-15 shy

th c The riate

iTlfoTlllation exist c1nd

nat ana] E3hOlld be straightforvard

sine red

3 J

1C111en18 are rop Hlet the

F 1) r the ren 0 r e J 2 - 3 a c1 d i t ionaJ s taU

v-in the grol~p

1870 and

vre aCE C(~middot

prOC2C

( r t ~~ 1 J~l

- _ _---- shy

6 V (~V x

it f f i I 1(middot 1 ~ () )01 in (~cV Eve1t81 0 esI

I) ) +

I(iii (I I ( ( I V () 1 t~ V [ 50 200 300

_-- - -- ------------shy-------------~---------

i lpn o )l lIh II 215

(01)middot11 u UU(i J gt )

1 ~ ) 1 fnI L I P (HI fO)U~ J 10 40 A JV

~ ( ) it) U (J( l i II ~

r- U (jiU I bull i il 1 ~

r

I l (J J ~ OI)O ~~ ] U~ 20 gO 200 330 i-

co

~~ ~~ o () ~ I OUOlg I 1 ~~ i~

i) ) ) O () l ~) Ooo~ J 1middot1 B

1 ) O 1 (l~ 00024 f) -J Ij H

O 1~~o o oo~n d J not 35 1L10 350 500

-------_-----------__---__ ___--- -___---- _-_

detector w h

- middot~t UO C~l~ V Li tiou rate h)drogen j2tjmiddotoxiniatetv

lt)

N cl t~ i j 0 n At t 2 x 10-)coHuulh at I III c l~ar C lOSH S (tee upproximately equal

II I) i UIHe HI Hue to CCHlnLer ((~ntef (11i f))

-17

5~__~l Phys Letters 30B 274 (1969)

3 190 (lDf)8)

Rev Letters 1 857 (1967)

L Stodo] Hev 144 1145 (1966)

G Bell tUrd et a1 Nucl ~ 79 609 (1966)

5 S c- ee lor e S II Be2-nlan and S D DreJ1 Phys Rev 133

791 (196 ) also )- N and J I-los en l nive of Rocheste r

Jet

0 I ~u

0middot j i~

L

~ ] TIle p P cIii ion

of crt

N (13

L

Fj fhc C~)

ener

) bull oj

gtlcEl ie

_ 0)

OJ

- -

()

C)

=middotmiddot0 (] _

gt

t

-~ L~J

LU

r c

fIIth

rmiddot f~

11 shy1

gt

0

C

rJ I~

CL -w

1

-~

-r- ~~

-I_J

- ii

-

-- C~

fJ

w)

o

i_

j

rshyr L~i

2 () G FJrotons

- -- (N lJ cIQ0 r~- Co U i 0 rii b )

middot (r 1 2-- f In j2 Ie)

o

0

()

~v

g

tt) 0

c

t)

~-

utJ

FE

shygt

0

()

c

C) ~~

C)

o~

0 C1

(J

~~

0

E

C

CJ 1~

J

41 C

l

(D

1

)

~

0 (lJ

(1 c C

C ~

o C

c) C~

t[)

- gt

c

-shy ~~ -1-shy

C)

~

iI

0 (J

I

__ 0 -shy

o

( 1 C~ ~

H

j~)

~

o

C)

61

l

f

CJ-

i

1

I I 1

L

1

1 J

I j

i

f i-i1 I

i ~

1 1

~

i l

J L I I

JII I

= -~~-~ bull-~~~~~) ~ u-)

nlnC

j~ I

Fig 6

E1 r ti I It 2 tq~ pound~ Jj ( J C S fro rn - fn

Channel Nurnber

c)L)

~) i

I

-1 -~

~ ]

)

1 J shy

p 11t(~i(1 o

El 1)10

b ) of H o

s tt-rnsfe to the

tT

For fill 0) o stU cc r on

-) ~

1_0

-1 shy

] ) - 210 10 - OS CUti

of

05 x 10 x 208 1 (()( c

Fo 1 oJ

rnnnn 0 ~ ~- 111 S L1 e

to 1]111 cni S f10Hld no intcJshy

fc

Ve L1S conld b( left in cc

Y en~ s

IV TCTS

In ~ to

llS

pro

1

011e of tIl rof

T can he ph~ced in 8n

IDe

C2n Ishy

-15 shy

th c The riate

iTlfoTlllation exist c1nd

nat ana] E3hOlld be straightforvard

sine red

3 J

1C111en18 are rop Hlet the

F 1) r the ren 0 r e J 2 - 3 a c1 d i t ionaJ s taU

v-in the grol~p

1870 and

vre aCE C(~middot

prOC2C

( r t ~~ 1 J~l

- _ _---- shy

6 V (~V x

it f f i I 1(middot 1 ~ () )01 in (~cV Eve1t81 0 esI

I) ) +

I(iii (I I ( ( I V () 1 t~ V [ 50 200 300

_-- - -- ------------shy-------------~---------

i lpn o )l lIh II 215

(01)middot11 u UU(i J gt )

1 ~ ) 1 fnI L I P (HI fO)U~ J 10 40 A JV

~ ( ) it) U (J( l i II ~

r- U (jiU I bull i il 1 ~

r

I l (J J ~ OI)O ~~ ] U~ 20 gO 200 330 i-

co

~~ ~~ o () ~ I OUOlg I 1 ~~ i~

i) ) ) O () l ~) Ooo~ J 1middot1 B

1 ) O 1 (l~ 00024 f) -J Ij H

O 1~~o o oo~n d J not 35 1L10 350 500

-------_-----------__---__ ___--- -___---- _-_

detector w h

- middot~t UO C~l~ V Li tiou rate h)drogen j2tjmiddotoxiniatetv

lt)

N cl t~ i j 0 n At t 2 x 10-)coHuulh at I III c l~ar C lOSH S (tee upproximately equal

II I) i UIHe HI Hue to CCHlnLer ((~ntef (11i f))

-17

5~__~l Phys Letters 30B 274 (1969)

3 190 (lDf)8)

Rev Letters 1 857 (1967)

L Stodo] Hev 144 1145 (1966)

G Bell tUrd et a1 Nucl ~ 79 609 (1966)

5 S c- ee lor e S II Be2-nlan and S D DreJ1 Phys Rev 133

791 (196 ) also )- N and J I-los en l nive of Rocheste r

Jet

0 I ~u

0middot j i~

L

~ ] TIle p P cIii ion

of crt

N (13

L

Fj fhc C~)

ener

) bull oj

gtlcEl ie

_ 0)

OJ

- -

()

C)

=middotmiddot0 (] _

gt

t

-~ L~J

LU

r c

fIIth

rmiddot f~

11 shy1

gt

0

C

rJ I~

CL -w

1

-~

-r- ~~

-I_J

- ii

-

-- C~

fJ

w)

o

i_

j

rshyr L~i

2 () G FJrotons

- -- (N lJ cIQ0 r~- Co U i 0 rii b )

middot (r 1 2-- f In j2 Ie)

o

0

()

~v

g

tt) 0

c

t)

~-

utJ

FE

shygt

0

()

c

C) ~~

C)

o~

0 C1

(J

~~

0

E

C

CJ 1~

J

41 C

l

(D

1

)

~

0 (lJ

(1 c C

C ~

o C

c) C~

t[)

- gt

c

-shy ~~ -1-shy

C)

~

iI

0 (J

I

__ 0 -shy

o

( 1 C~ ~

H

j~)

~

o

C)

61

l

f

CJ-

i

1

I I 1

L

1

1 J

I j

i

f i-i1 I

i ~

1 1

~

i l

J L I I

JII I

= -~~-~ bull-~~~~~) ~ u-)

nlnC

j~ I

Fig 6

E1 r ti I It 2 tq~ pound~ Jj ( J C S fro rn - fn

Channel Nurnber

c)L)

~) i

I

-1 -~

~ ]

)

-1 shy

] ) - 210 10 - OS CUti

of

05 x 10 x 208 1 (()( c

Fo 1 oJ

rnnnn 0 ~ ~- 111 S L1 e

to 1]111 cni S f10Hld no intcJshy

fc

Ve L1S conld b( left in cc

Y en~ s

IV TCTS

In ~ to

llS

pro

1

011e of tIl rof

T can he ph~ced in 8n

IDe

C2n Ishy

-15 shy

th c The riate

iTlfoTlllation exist c1nd

nat ana] E3hOlld be straightforvard

sine red

3 J

1C111en18 are rop Hlet the

F 1) r the ren 0 r e J 2 - 3 a c1 d i t ionaJ s taU

v-in the grol~p

1870 and

vre aCE C(~middot

prOC2C

( r t ~~ 1 J~l

- _ _---- shy

6 V (~V x

it f f i I 1(middot 1 ~ () )01 in (~cV Eve1t81 0 esI

I) ) +

I(iii (I I ( ( I V () 1 t~ V [ 50 200 300

_-- - -- ------------shy-------------~---------

i lpn o )l lIh II 215

(01)middot11 u UU(i J gt )

1 ~ ) 1 fnI L I P (HI fO)U~ J 10 40 A JV

~ ( ) it) U (J( l i II ~

r- U (jiU I bull i il 1 ~

r

I l (J J ~ OI)O ~~ ] U~ 20 gO 200 330 i-

co

~~ ~~ o () ~ I OUOlg I 1 ~~ i~

i) ) ) O () l ~) Ooo~ J 1middot1 B

1 ) O 1 (l~ 00024 f) -J Ij H

O 1~~o o oo~n d J not 35 1L10 350 500

-------_-----------__---__ ___--- -___---- _-_

detector w h

- middot~t UO C~l~ V Li tiou rate h)drogen j2tjmiddotoxiniatetv

lt)

N cl t~ i j 0 n At t 2 x 10-)coHuulh at I III c l~ar C lOSH S (tee upproximately equal

II I) i UIHe HI Hue to CCHlnLer ((~ntef (11i f))

-17

5~__~l Phys Letters 30B 274 (1969)

3 190 (lDf)8)

Rev Letters 1 857 (1967)

L Stodo] Hev 144 1145 (1966)

G Bell tUrd et a1 Nucl ~ 79 609 (1966)

5 S c- ee lor e S II Be2-nlan and S D DreJ1 Phys Rev 133

791 (196 ) also )- N and J I-los en l nive of Rocheste r

Jet

0 I ~u

0middot j i~

L

~ ] TIle p P cIii ion

of crt

N (13

L

Fj fhc C~)

ener

) bull oj

gtlcEl ie

_ 0)

OJ

- -

()

C)

=middotmiddot0 (] _

gt

t

-~ L~J

LU

r c

fIIth

rmiddot f~

11 shy1

gt

0

C

rJ I~

CL -w

1

-~

-r- ~~

-I_J

- ii

-

-- C~

fJ

w)

o

i_

j

rshyr L~i

2 () G FJrotons

- -- (N lJ cIQ0 r~- Co U i 0 rii b )

middot (r 1 2-- f In j2 Ie)

o

0

()

~v

g

tt) 0

c

t)

~-

utJ

FE

shygt

0

()

c

C) ~~

C)

o~

0 C1

(J

~~

0

E

C

CJ 1~

J

41 C

l

(D

1

)

~

0 (lJ

(1 c C

C ~

o C

c) C~

t[)

- gt

c

-shy ~~ -1-shy

C)

~

iI

0 (J

I

__ 0 -shy

o

( 1 C~ ~

H

j~)

~

o

C)

61

l

f

CJ-

i

1

I I 1

L

1

1 J

I j

i

f i-i1 I

i ~

1 1

~

i l

J L I I

JII I

= -~~-~ bull-~~~~~) ~ u-)

nlnC

j~ I

Fig 6

E1 r ti I It 2 tq~ pound~ Jj ( J C S fro rn - fn

Channel Nurnber

c)L)

~) i

I

-1 -~

~ ]

)

to 1]111 cni S f10Hld no intcJshy

fc

Ve L1S conld b( left in cc

Y en~ s

IV TCTS

In ~ to

llS

pro

1

011e of tIl rof

T can he ph~ced in 8n

IDe

C2n Ishy

-15 shy

th c The riate

iTlfoTlllation exist c1nd

nat ana] E3hOlld be straightforvard

sine red

3 J

1C111en18 are rop Hlet the

F 1) r the ren 0 r e J 2 - 3 a c1 d i t ionaJ s taU

v-in the grol~p

1870 and

vre aCE C(~middot

prOC2C

( r t ~~ 1 J~l

- _ _---- shy

6 V (~V x

it f f i I 1(middot 1 ~ () )01 in (~cV Eve1t81 0 esI

I) ) +

I(iii (I I ( ( I V () 1 t~ V [ 50 200 300

_-- - -- ------------shy-------------~---------

i lpn o )l lIh II 215

(01)middot11 u UU(i J gt )

1 ~ ) 1 fnI L I P (HI fO)U~ J 10 40 A JV

~ ( ) it) U (J( l i II ~

r- U (jiU I bull i il 1 ~

r

I l (J J ~ OI)O ~~ ] U~ 20 gO 200 330 i-

co

~~ ~~ o () ~ I OUOlg I 1 ~~ i~

i) ) ) O () l ~) Ooo~ J 1middot1 B

1 ) O 1 (l~ 00024 f) -J Ij H

O 1~~o o oo~n d J not 35 1L10 350 500

-------_-----------__---__ ___--- -___---- _-_

detector w h

- middot~t UO C~l~ V Li tiou rate h)drogen j2tjmiddotoxiniatetv

lt)

N cl t~ i j 0 n At t 2 x 10-)coHuulh at I III c l~ar C lOSH S (tee upproximately equal

II I) i UIHe HI Hue to CCHlnLer ((~ntef (11i f))

-17

5~__~l Phys Letters 30B 274 (1969)

3 190 (lDf)8)

Rev Letters 1 857 (1967)

L Stodo] Hev 144 1145 (1966)

G Bell tUrd et a1 Nucl ~ 79 609 (1966)

5 S c- ee lor e S II Be2-nlan and S D DreJ1 Phys Rev 133

791 (196 ) also )- N and J I-los en l nive of Rocheste r

Jet

0 I ~u

0middot j i~

L

~ ] TIle p P cIii ion

of crt

N (13

L

Fj fhc C~)

ener

) bull oj

gtlcEl ie

_ 0)

OJ

- -

()

C)

=middotmiddot0 (] _

gt

t

-~ L~J

LU

r c

fIIth

rmiddot f~

11 shy1

gt

0

C

rJ I~

CL -w

1

-~

-r- ~~

-I_J

- ii

-

-- C~

fJ

w)

o

i_

j

rshyr L~i

2 () G FJrotons

- -- (N lJ cIQ0 r~- Co U i 0 rii b )

middot (r 1 2-- f In j2 Ie)

o

0

()

~v

g

tt) 0

c

t)

~-

utJ

FE

shygt

0

()

c

C) ~~

C)

o~

0 C1

(J

~~

0

E

C

CJ 1~

J

41 C

l

(D

1

)

~

0 (lJ

(1 c C

C ~

o C

c) C~

t[)

- gt

c

-shy ~~ -1-shy

C)

~

iI

0 (J

I

__ 0 -shy

o

( 1 C~ ~

H

j~)

~

o

C)

61

l

f

CJ-

i

1

I I 1

L

1

1 J

I j

i

f i-i1 I

i ~

1 1

~

i l

J L I I

JII I

= -~~-~ bull-~~~~~) ~ u-)

nlnC

j~ I

Fig 6

E1 r ti I It 2 tq~ pound~ Jj ( J C S fro rn - fn

Channel Nurnber

c)L)

~) i

I

-1 -~

~ ]

)

011e of tIl rof

T can he ph~ced in 8n

IDe

C2n Ishy

-15 shy

th c The riate

iTlfoTlllation exist c1nd

nat ana] E3hOlld be straightforvard

sine red

3 J

1C111en18 are rop Hlet the

F 1) r the ren 0 r e J 2 - 3 a c1 d i t ionaJ s taU

v-in the grol~p

1870 and

vre aCE C(~middot

prOC2C

( r t ~~ 1 J~l

- _ _---- shy

6 V (~V x

it f f i I 1(middot 1 ~ () )01 in (~cV Eve1t81 0 esI

I) ) +

I(iii (I I ( ( I V () 1 t~ V [ 50 200 300

_-- - -- ------------shy-------------~---------

i lpn o )l lIh II 215

(01)middot11 u UU(i J gt )

1 ~ ) 1 fnI L I P (HI fO)U~ J 10 40 A JV

~ ( ) it) U (J( l i II ~

r- U (jiU I bull i il 1 ~

r

I l (J J ~ OI)O ~~ ] U~ 20 gO 200 330 i-

co

~~ ~~ o () ~ I OUOlg I 1 ~~ i~

i) ) ) O () l ~) Ooo~ J 1middot1 B

1 ) O 1 (l~ 00024 f) -J Ij H

O 1~~o o oo~n d J not 35 1L10 350 500

-------_-----------__---__ ___--- -___---- _-_

detector w h

- middot~t UO C~l~ V Li tiou rate h)drogen j2tjmiddotoxiniatetv

lt)

N cl t~ i j 0 n At t 2 x 10-)coHuulh at I III c l~ar C lOSH S (tee upproximately equal

II I) i UIHe HI Hue to CCHlnLer ((~ntef (11i f))

-17

5~__~l Phys Letters 30B 274 (1969)

3 190 (lDf)8)

Rev Letters 1 857 (1967)

L Stodo] Hev 144 1145 (1966)

G Bell tUrd et a1 Nucl ~ 79 609 (1966)

5 S c- ee lor e S II Be2-nlan and S D DreJ1 Phys Rev 133

791 (196 ) also )- N and J I-los en l nive of Rocheste r

Jet

0 I ~u

0middot j i~

L

~ ] TIle p P cIii ion

of crt

N (13

L

Fj fhc C~)

ener

) bull oj

gtlcEl ie

_ 0)

OJ

- -

()

C)

=middotmiddot0 (] _

gt

t

-~ L~J

LU

r c

fIIth

rmiddot f~

11 shy1

gt

0

C

rJ I~

CL -w

1

-~

-r- ~~

-I_J

- ii

-

-- C~

fJ

w)

o

i_

j

rshyr L~i

2 () G FJrotons

- -- (N lJ cIQ0 r~- Co U i 0 rii b )

middot (r 1 2-- f In j2 Ie)

o

0

()

~v

g

tt) 0

c

t)

~-

utJ

FE

shygt

0

()

c

C) ~~

C)

o~

0 C1

(J

~~

0

E

C

CJ 1~

J

41 C

l

(D

1

)

~

0 (lJ

(1 c C

C ~

o C

c) C~

t[)

- gt

c

-shy ~~ -1-shy

C)

~

iI

0 (J

I

__ 0 -shy

o

( 1 C~ ~

H

j~)

~

o

C)

61

l

f

CJ-

i

1

I I 1

L

1

1 J

I j

i

f i-i1 I

i ~

1 1

~

i l

J L I I

JII I

= -~~-~ bull-~~~~~) ~ u-)

nlnC

j~ I

Fig 6

E1 r ti I It 2 tq~ pound~ Jj ( J C S fro rn - fn

Channel Nurnber

c)L)

~) i

I

-1 -~

~ ]

)

-15 shy

th c The riate

iTlfoTlllation exist c1nd

nat ana] E3hOlld be straightforvard

sine red

3 J

1C111en18 are rop Hlet the

F 1) r the ren 0 r e J 2 - 3 a c1 d i t ionaJ s taU

v-in the grol~p

1870 and

vre aCE C(~middot

prOC2C

( r t ~~ 1 J~l

- _ _---- shy

6 V (~V x

it f f i I 1(middot 1 ~ () )01 in (~cV Eve1t81 0 esI

I) ) +

I(iii (I I ( ( I V () 1 t~ V [ 50 200 300

_-- - -- ------------shy-------------~---------

i lpn o )l lIh II 215

(01)middot11 u UU(i J gt )

1 ~ ) 1 fnI L I P (HI fO)U~ J 10 40 A JV

~ ( ) it) U (J( l i II ~

r- U (jiU I bull i il 1 ~

r

I l (J J ~ OI)O ~~ ] U~ 20 gO 200 330 i-

co

~~ ~~ o () ~ I OUOlg I 1 ~~ i~

i) ) ) O () l ~) Ooo~ J 1middot1 B

1 ) O 1 (l~ 00024 f) -J Ij H

O 1~~o o oo~n d J not 35 1L10 350 500

-------_-----------__---__ ___--- -___---- _-_

detector w h

- middot~t UO C~l~ V Li tiou rate h)drogen j2tjmiddotoxiniatetv

lt)

N cl t~ i j 0 n At t 2 x 10-)coHuulh at I III c l~ar C lOSH S (tee upproximately equal

II I) i UIHe HI Hue to CCHlnLer ((~ntef (11i f))

-17

5~__~l Phys Letters 30B 274 (1969)

3 190 (lDf)8)

Rev Letters 1 857 (1967)

L Stodo] Hev 144 1145 (1966)

G Bell tUrd et a1 Nucl ~ 79 609 (1966)

5 S c- ee lor e S II Be2-nlan and S D DreJ1 Phys Rev 133

791 (196 ) also )- N and J I-los en l nive of Rocheste r

Jet

0 I ~u

0middot j i~

L

~ ] TIle p P cIii ion

of crt

N (13

L

Fj fhc C~)

ener

) bull oj

gtlcEl ie

_ 0)

OJ

- -

()

C)

=middotmiddot0 (] _

gt

t

-~ L~J

LU

r c

fIIth

rmiddot f~

11 shy1

gt

0

C

rJ I~

CL -w

1

-~

-r- ~~

-I_J

- ii

-

-- C~

fJ

w)

o

i_

j

rshyr L~i

2 () G FJrotons

- -- (N lJ cIQ0 r~- Co U i 0 rii b )

middot (r 1 2-- f In j2 Ie)

o

0

()

~v

g

tt) 0

c

t)

~-

utJ

FE

shygt

0

()

c

C) ~~

C)

o~

0 C1

(J

~~

0

E

C

CJ 1~

J

41 C

l

(D

1

)

~

0 (lJ

(1 c C

C ~

o C

c) C~

t[)

- gt

c

-shy ~~ -1-shy

C)

~

iI

0 (J

I

__ 0 -shy

o

( 1 C~ ~

H

j~)

~

o

C)

61

l

f

CJ-

i

1

I I 1

L

1

1 J

I j

i

f i-i1 I

i ~

1 1

~

i l

J L I I

JII I

= -~~-~ bull-~~~~~) ~ u-)

nlnC

j~ I

Fig 6

E1 r ti I It 2 tq~ pound~ Jj ( J C S fro rn - fn

Channel Nurnber

c)L)

~) i

I

-1 -~

~ ]

)

( r t ~~ 1 J~l

- _ _---- shy

6 V (~V x

it f f i I 1(middot 1 ~ () )01 in (~cV Eve1t81 0 esI

I) ) +

I(iii (I I ( ( I V () 1 t~ V [ 50 200 300

_-- - -- ------------shy-------------~---------

i lpn o )l lIh II 215

(01)middot11 u UU(i J gt )

1 ~ ) 1 fnI L I P (HI fO)U~ J 10 40 A JV

~ ( ) it) U (J( l i II ~

r- U (jiU I bull i il 1 ~

r

I l (J J ~ OI)O ~~ ] U~ 20 gO 200 330 i-

co

~~ ~~ o () ~ I OUOlg I 1 ~~ i~

i) ) ) O () l ~) Ooo~ J 1middot1 B

1 ) O 1 (l~ 00024 f) -J Ij H

O 1~~o o oo~n d J not 35 1L10 350 500

-------_-----------__---__ ___--- -___---- _-_

detector w h

- middot~t UO C~l~ V Li tiou rate h)drogen j2tjmiddotoxiniatetv

lt)

N cl t~ i j 0 n At t 2 x 10-)coHuulh at I III c l~ar C lOSH S (tee upproximately equal

II I) i UIHe HI Hue to CCHlnLer ((~ntef (11i f))

-17

5~__~l Phys Letters 30B 274 (1969)

3 190 (lDf)8)

Rev Letters 1 857 (1967)

L Stodo] Hev 144 1145 (1966)

G Bell tUrd et a1 Nucl ~ 79 609 (1966)

5 S c- ee lor e S II Be2-nlan and S D DreJ1 Phys Rev 133

791 (196 ) also )- N and J I-los en l nive of Rocheste r

Jet

0 I ~u

0middot j i~

L

~ ] TIle p P cIii ion

of crt

N (13

L

Fj fhc C~)

ener

) bull oj

gtlcEl ie

_ 0)

OJ

- -

()

C)

=middotmiddot0 (] _

gt

t

-~ L~J

LU

r c

fIIth

rmiddot f~

11 shy1

gt

0

C

rJ I~

CL -w

1

-~

-r- ~~

-I_J

- ii

-

-- C~

fJ

w)

o

i_

j

rshyr L~i

2 () G FJrotons

- -- (N lJ cIQ0 r~- Co U i 0 rii b )

middot (r 1 2-- f In j2 Ie)

o

0

()

~v

g

tt) 0

c

t)

~-

utJ

FE

shygt

0

()

c

C) ~~

C)

o~

0 C1

(J

~~

0

E

C

CJ 1~

J

41 C

l

(D

1

)

~

0 (lJ

(1 c C

C ~

o C

c) C~

t[)

- gt

c

-shy ~~ -1-shy

C)

~

iI

0 (J

I

__ 0 -shy

o

( 1 C~ ~

H

j~)

~

o

C)

61

l

f

CJ-

i

1

I I 1

L

1

1 J

I j

i

f i-i1 I

i ~

1 1

~

i l

J L I I

JII I

= -~~-~ bull-~~~~~) ~ u-)

nlnC

j~ I

Fig 6

E1 r ti I It 2 tq~ pound~ Jj ( J C S fro rn - fn

Channel Nurnber

c)L)

~) i

I

-1 -~

~ ]

)

-17

5~__~l Phys Letters 30B 274 (1969)

3 190 (lDf)8)

Rev Letters 1 857 (1967)

L Stodo] Hev 144 1145 (1966)

G Bell tUrd et a1 Nucl ~ 79 609 (1966)

5 S c- ee lor e S II Be2-nlan and S D DreJ1 Phys Rev 133

791 (196 ) also )- N and J I-los en l nive of Rocheste r

Jet

0 I ~u

0middot j i~

L

~ ] TIle p P cIii ion

of crt

N (13

L

Fj fhc C~)

ener

) bull oj

gtlcEl ie

_ 0)

OJ

- -

()

C)

=middotmiddot0 (] _

gt

t

-~ L~J

LU

r c

fIIth

rmiddot f~

11 shy1

gt

0

C

rJ I~

CL -w

1

-~

-r- ~~

-I_J

- ii

-

-- C~

fJ

w)

o

i_

j

rshyr L~i

2 () G FJrotons

- -- (N lJ cIQ0 r~- Co U i 0 rii b )

middot (r 1 2-- f In j2 Ie)

o

0

()

~v

g

tt) 0

c

t)

~-

utJ

FE

shygt

0

()

c

C) ~~

C)

o~

0 C1

(J

~~

0

E

C

CJ 1~

J

41 C

l

(D

1

)

~

0 (lJ

(1 c C

C ~

o C

c) C~

t[)

- gt

c

-shy ~~ -1-shy

C)

~

iI

0 (J

I

__ 0 -shy

o

( 1 C~ ~

H

j~)

~

o

C)

61

l

f

CJ-

i

1

I I 1

L

1

1 J

I j

i

f i-i1 I

i ~

1 1

~

i l

J L I I

JII I

= -~~-~ bull-~~~~~) ~ u-)

nlnC

j~ I

Fig 6

E1 r ti I It 2 tq~ pound~ Jj ( J C S fro rn - fn

Channel Nurnber

c)L)

~) i

I

-1 -~

~ ]

)

0middot j i~

L

~ ] TIle p P cIii ion

of crt

N (13

L

Fj fhc C~)

ener

) bull oj

gtlcEl ie

_ 0)

OJ

- -

()

C)

=middotmiddot0 (] _

gt

t

-~ L~J

LU

r c

fIIth

rmiddot f~

11 shy1

gt

0

C

rJ I~

CL -w

1

-~

-r- ~~

-I_J

- ii

-

-- C~

fJ

w)

o

i_

j

rshyr L~i

2 () G FJrotons

- -- (N lJ cIQ0 r~- Co U i 0 rii b )

middot (r 1 2-- f In j2 Ie)

o

0

()

~v

g

tt) 0

c

t)

~-

utJ

FE

shygt

0

()

c

C) ~~

C)

o~

0 C1

(J

~~

0

E

C

CJ 1~

J

41 C

l

(D

1

)

~

0 (lJ

(1 c C

C ~

o C

c) C~

t[)

- gt

c

-shy ~~ -1-shy

C)

~

iI

0 (J

I

__ 0 -shy

o

( 1 C~ ~

H

j~)

~

o

C)

61

l

f

CJ-

i

1

I I 1

L

1

1 J

I j

i

f i-i1 I

i ~

1 1

~

i l

J L I I

JII I

= -~~-~ bull-~~~~~) ~ u-)

nlnC

j~ I

Fig 6

E1 r ti I It 2 tq~ pound~ Jj ( J C S fro rn - fn

Channel Nurnber

c)L)

~) i

I

-1 -~

~ ]

)

()

C)

=middotmiddot0 (] _

gt

t

-~ L~J

LU

r c

fIIth

rmiddot f~

11 shy1

gt

0

C

rJ I~

CL -w

1

-~

-r- ~~

-I_J

- ii

-

-- C~

fJ

w)

o

i_

j

rshyr L~i

2 () G FJrotons

- -- (N lJ cIQ0 r~- Co U i 0 rii b )

middot (r 1 2-- f In j2 Ie)

o

0

()

~v

g

tt) 0

c

t)

~-

utJ

FE

shygt

0

()

c

C) ~~

C)

o~

0 C1

(J

~~

0

E

C

CJ 1~

J

41 C

l

(D

1

)

~

0 (lJ

(1 c C

C ~

o C

c) C~

t[)

- gt

c

-shy ~~ -1-shy

C)

~

iI

0 (J

I

__ 0 -shy

o

( 1 C~ ~

H

j~)

~

o

C)

61

l

f

CJ-

i

1

I I 1

L

1

1 J

I j

i

f i-i1 I

i ~

1 1

~

i l

J L I I

JII I

= -~~-~ bull-~~~~~) ~ u-)

nlnC

j~ I

Fig 6

E1 r ti I It 2 tq~ pound~ Jj ( J C S fro rn - fn

Channel Nurnber

c)L)

~) i

I

-1 -~

~ ]

)

o

i_

j

rshyr L~i

2 () G FJrotons

- -- (N lJ cIQ0 r~- Co U i 0 rii b )

middot (r 1 2-- f In j2 Ie)

o

0

()

~v

g

tt) 0

c

t)

~-

utJ

FE

shygt

0

()

c

C) ~~

C)

o~

0 C1

(J

~~

0

E

C

CJ 1~

J

41 C

l

(D

1

)

~

0 (lJ

(1 c C

C ~

o C

c) C~

t[)

- gt

c

-shy ~~ -1-shy

C)

~

iI

0 (J

I

__ 0 -shy

o

( 1 C~ ~

H

j~)

~

o

C)

61

l

f

CJ-

i

1

I I 1

L

1

1 J

I j

i

f i-i1 I

i ~

1 1

~

i l

J L I I

JII I

= -~~-~ bull-~~~~~) ~ u-)

nlnC

j~ I

Fig 6

E1 r ti I It 2 tq~ pound~ Jj ( J C S fro rn - fn

Channel Nurnber

c)L)

~) i

I

-1 -~

~ ]

)

o

0

()

~v

g

tt) 0

c

t)

~-

utJ

FE

shygt

0

()

c

C) ~~

C)

o~

0 C1

(J

~~

0

E

C

CJ 1~

J

41 C

l

(D

1

)

~

0 (lJ

(1 c C

C ~

o C

c) C~

t[)

- gt

c

-shy ~~ -1-shy

C)

~

iI

0 (J

I

__ 0 -shy

o

( 1 C~ ~

H

j~)

~

o

C)

61

l

f

CJ-

i

1

I I 1

L

1

1 J

I j

i

f i-i1 I

i ~

1 1

~

i l

J L I I

JII I

= -~~-~ bull-~~~~~) ~ u-)

nlnC

j~ I

Fig 6

E1 r ti I It 2 tq~ pound~ Jj ( J C S fro rn - fn

Channel Nurnber

c)L)

~) i

I

-1 -~

~ ]

)

__ 0 -shy

o

( 1 C~ ~

H

j~)

~

o

C)

61

l

f

CJ-

i

1

I I 1

L

1

1 J

I j

i

f i-i1 I

i ~

1 1

~

i l

J L I I

JII I

= -~~-~ bull-~~~~~) ~ u-)

nlnC

j~ I

Fig 6

E1 r ti I It 2 tq~ pound~ Jj ( J C S fro rn - fn

Channel Nurnber

c)L)

~) i

I

-1 -~

~ ]

)

( 1 C~ ~

H

j~)

~

o

C)

61

l

f

CJ-

i

1

I I 1

L

1

1 J

I j

i

f i-i1 I

i ~

1 1

~

i l

J L I I

JII I

= -~~-~ bull-~~~~~) ~ u-)

nlnC

j~ I

Fig 6

E1 r ti I It 2 tq~ pound~ Jj ( J C S fro rn - fn

Channel Nurnber

c)L)

~) i

I

-1 -~

~ ]

)

i

1

I I 1

L

1

1 J

I j

i

f i-i1 I

i ~

1 1

~

i l

J L I I

JII I

= -~~-~ bull-~~~~~) ~ u-)

nlnC

j~ I

Fig 6

E1 r ti I It 2 tq~ pound~ Jj ( J C S fro rn - fn

Channel Nurnber

c)L)

~) i

I

-1 -~

~ ]

)

Fig 6

E1 r ti I It 2 tq~ pound~ Jj ( J C S fro rn - fn

Channel Nurnber

c)L)

~) i

I

-1 -~

~ ]

)

E1 r ti I It 2 tq~ pound~ Jj ( J C S fro rn - fn

Channel Nurnber

c)L)

~) i

I

-1 -~

~ ]

)

~) i

I

-1 -~

~ ]

)