21
Correlation between Emotional States and Syntactic Speech Characteristics Tatyana Sineokova (Nizhni Novgorod State Linguistic University, Russia) [email protected] Corfu, 2011

Correlation between Emotional States and Syntactic Speech Characteristics Tatyana Sineokova (Nizhni Novgorod State Linguistic University, Russia) [email protected]

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Correlation between Emotional States and Syntactic Speech Characteristics Tatyana Sineokova (Nizhni Novgorod State Linguistic University, Russia) tns@lunn.ru

Correlation between Emotional States and Syntactic

Speech Characteristics

Tatyana Sineokova(Nizhni Novgorod State Linguistic University, Russia)

[email protected]

Corfu, 2011

Page 2: Correlation between Emotional States and Syntactic Speech Characteristics Tatyana Sineokova (Nizhni Novgorod State Linguistic University, Russia) tns@lunn.ru

Studies of emotions speech correlatives show:

- on phonetic/phonological and lexical levels there exists a certain set of language exponents of a particular a particular emotional stateemotional state

- syntactic level in this respect proves to be irrelevant (for example, such different emotions as delight and anger are often manifested through similar syntactic constructions)

Page 3: Correlation between Emotional States and Syntactic Speech Characteristics Tatyana Sineokova (Nizhni Novgorod State Linguistic University, Russia) tns@lunn.ru

Analysis of speech patterns realized in the state of emotional tension shows that syntactic variations depend not on a definite emotion

but on the impact – positive (constructive) or

negative (destructive) – the emotion produces on a person’s activity on the whole, including speech-thought processes.

Page 4: Correlation between Emotional States and Syntactic Speech Characteristics Tatyana Sineokova (Nizhni Novgorod State Linguistic University, Russia) tns@lunn.ru

Studies in biochemistry, physiology, psychology show that emotional states immediately affecting thinking and speaking activities can be classified into three major types:

— dissociation/dissolution/distress exerting negative influence upon thinking and speaking activities;

— eustress exerting positive influence upon the activities;

— boundary adaptation state between the two

which we called searching state.

Page 5: Correlation between Emotional States and Syntactic Speech Characteristics Tatyana Sineokova (Nizhni Novgorod State Linguistic University, Russia) tns@lunn.ru

The three types

• represent steady physiological states,

• are discrete,

• can be reliably identified in the course of laboratory biochemical and physiological tests

Page 6: Correlation between Emotional States and Syntactic Speech Characteristics Tatyana Sineokova (Nizhni Novgorod State Linguistic University, Russia) tns@lunn.ru

• State of eustress consciousness is

relatively under

control

• Searching state boundary zone

• State of dissociation minimum level

of consciousness

Page 7: Correlation between Emotional States and Syntactic Speech Characteristics Tatyana Sineokova (Nizhni Novgorod State Linguistic University, Russia) tns@lunn.ru

The three-term series of emotional states was taken as

the extralinguistic constituent of interactive classification

aiming at establishing significant correlative links between the

psychological state and syntactic speech characteristics and thus

testifying prognostic potential of the classification

Page 8: Correlation between Emotional States and Syntactic Speech Characteristics Tatyana Sineokova (Nizhni Novgorod State Linguistic University, Russia) tns@lunn.ru

The linguistic constituent of the interactive classification was based on

the acknowledgment of the

deformed character of emotional syntax.

Kernel sentence structure realized in neutral speech undergoes changes under the

influence of affective processes.

Page 9: Correlation between Emotional States and Syntactic Speech Characteristics Tatyana Sineokova (Nizhni Novgorod State Linguistic University, Russia) tns@lunn.ru

Structure deviations of the first two levels of the classification testify to the affective

type of speech upon the whole.

It’s the last classification level of primary features which displays correlative links with the three psychological states and displays the prognostic potential of the

classification.

Page 10: Correlation between Emotional States and Syntactic Speech Characteristics Tatyana Sineokova (Nizhni Novgorod State Linguistic University, Russia) tns@lunn.ru

Characteristics of kernel sentence:

• limited number of components including only obligatory syntactic positions;

• obligatory character of basic syntactic positions;

• fixed order of elements within the communicative type of the sentence;

• communicative and syntagmatic independence of the sentence.

Page 11: Correlation between Emotional States and Syntactic Speech Characteristics Tatyana Sineokova (Nizhni Novgorod State Linguistic University, Russia) tns@lunn.ru

Deviations from kernel sentence structure can be presented as a three-level

hierarchical classification including

the highest level of transformations

the second level of modifications

the third level of primary features

Page 12: Correlation between Emotional States and Syntactic Speech Characteristics Tatyana Sineokova (Nizhni Novgorod State Linguistic University, Russia) tns@lunn.ru

Structure of linguistic constituent of the interactive classification

I. Level of transformations dichotomous division of non-neutral structures: explicative forms implicative forms

II. Level of modifications eight deformations of explicative and

implicative constructions: repetition materially excessive elements inversion transposition breaks of potential syntactic units decipher constructions ellipsis isolated structuresIII. Level of primary features forty primary features singled out within the eight deformations

Page 13: Correlation between Emotional States and Syntactic Speech Characteristics Tatyana Sineokova (Nizhni Novgorod State Linguistic University, Russia) tns@lunn.ru

Structure deviations of the first two levels of the classification testify to the affective type of speech upon the whole.

It’s the last classification level of primary features which displays correlative links with the three psychological states and displays the prognostic potential of the classification.

Page 14: Correlation between Emotional States and Syntactic Speech Characteristics Tatyana Sineokova (Nizhni Novgorod State Linguistic University, Russia) tns@lunn.ru

The informative value of the classification can be estimated on the basis of Boltzmann entropy of choice before and after application of the algorithm of prognosis.

When testing a sample of 1000 utterances, initial entropy of 1.6 bits (which corresponds to the choice of one of three equally probable psychological states) was reduced to 0.89 bits.

Thus, the results indicate approximately two-fold reduction of the original sample entropy. As uncertainty estimated for entropy uses a logarithmic scale, prognostic potential of the developed classification can be regarded as good enough. Such rare psychological states as the state of dissociation and the searching state are identified in 82% and 70% cases respectively.

Page 15: Correlation between Emotional States and Syntactic Speech Characteristics Tatyana Sineokova (Nizhni Novgorod State Linguistic University, Russia) tns@lunn.ru

Research program. Fragment 1.

Page 16: Correlation between Emotional States and Syntactic Speech Characteristics Tatyana Sineokova (Nizhni Novgorod State Linguistic University, Russia) tns@lunn.ru

Research program. Fragment 2.

Page 17: Correlation between Emotional States and Syntactic Speech Characteristics Tatyana Sineokova (Nizhni Novgorod State Linguistic University, Russia) tns@lunn.ru

Research program. Fragment 3.

Page 18: Correlation between Emotional States and Syntactic Speech Characteristics Tatyana Sineokova (Nizhni Novgorod State Linguistic University, Russia) tns@lunn.ru

Some regularities in the use of structural forms in different states were established: diversity, complexity, frequency, dominance and compatibility of features.

Presumably, these regularities should be included in the algorithms of identifying signs of emotional speech deviations to distinguish it from other forms of speech deviations and to highlight specific emotional forms.

Page 19: Correlation between Emotional States and Syntactic Speech Characteristics Tatyana Sineokova (Nizhni Novgorod State Linguistic University, Russia) tns@lunn.ru

Complexity (number of structural features) of the utterance

realized in different states, %

ComplexityComplexity DissociationDissociation Searching stateSearching state EustressEustress

11 39,4 16,3 37,8

22 44,5 47,7 42,7

33 14,5 24,4 15,0

44 1,6 11,2 4,0

55 0 0,7 0,5

Page 20: Correlation between Emotional States and Syntactic Speech Characteristics Tatyana Sineokova (Nizhni Novgorod State Linguistic University, Russia) tns@lunn.ru

All these estimates are "lower estimates" demonstrating the possibility of emotional state

prognosis based on the analysis of structural features of the utterance.

As the development of optimal prediction algorithm was not included in the objectives of

the work, more complex algorithms can

significantly improve the outcome prediction.

Page 21: Correlation between Emotional States and Syntactic Speech Characteristics Tatyana Sineokova (Nizhni Novgorod State Linguistic University, Russia) tns@lunn.ru

THAHK YOU!

Contacts:Tatyana Sineokova ([email protected])