5
Corrected Log Mean Temperature D Parameters Th1 (K) 400 Th2 (K) 170 Tc1 (K) 110 Tc2 (K) 190 Shell-Side Passe 2 Results Correction Facto 0.94281 LMTD 119.735 Corrected LMTD 112.888 Intermediate Calculations P 0.27586 R 2.875 X 0.19888 http://excelcalculations.blogspot.com

Corrected Lm Td

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Corrected Lm Td

Citation preview

Sheet1Corrected Log Mean Temperature Differencehttp://excelcalculations.blogspot.com

ParametersTh1 (K)400Th2 (K)170Tc1 (K)110Tc2 (K)190Shell-Side Passes2

ResultsCorrection Factor0.9428089966LMTD119.7353400222Corrected LMTD112.8875557859

Intermediate CalculationsP0.275862069R2.875X0.1988814304

Sheet2Corrected Log Mean Temperature Difference for Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchangers

This Excel spreadsheet calculates the corrected LMTD for shell-and-tube heat exchangers with multiple shell-side passes.

True log mean temperature differences are only valid in double-pipe (or tubular) heat exchangers; hence for more complex shell-and-tube arrangements, we have to muliply the LMTD by a factor.

The equations used in the spreadsheet are taken from the work of Bowman et al (1940) and are given below.

Note that R is the temperature change ratio of the hot and cold streams, while P is the temperature change of the cold fluid divided by the maximum temperature difference. F is the LMTD correction factor.

Perrys Chemical Engineers' Handbook states LMTD correction factors lower than 0.8 indicate inefficient heat exchanger design, while the Heat Exchanger Design Handbook advises that the minimum value should be 0.75.

Sheet3