22
CORPS OF ENGINEERS CORPS OF ENGINEERS REGULATORY PROGRAM REGULATORY PROGRAM PUBLIC INTEREST REVIEW PUBLIC INTEREST REVIEW (33 CFR Part 320) (33 CFR Part 320) August 12, 2005 August 12, 2005

CORPS OF ENGINEERS REGULATORY PROGRAM PUBLIC INTEREST REVIEW (33 CFR Part 320) August 12, 2005

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: CORPS OF ENGINEERS REGULATORY PROGRAM PUBLIC INTEREST REVIEW (33 CFR Part 320) August 12, 2005

CORPS OF ENGINEERSCORPS OF ENGINEERS

REGULATORY PROGRAMREGULATORY PROGRAM

PUBLIC INTEREST REVIEWPUBLIC INTEREST REVIEW

(33 CFR Part 320)(33 CFR Part 320)

August 12, 2005August 12, 2005

Page 2: CORPS OF ENGINEERS REGULATORY PROGRAM PUBLIC INTEREST REVIEW (33 CFR Part 320) August 12, 2005

Public Interest Evaluation

Public Interest…

the people’s concerns or rights over the (protection and wise use of) waters of the U.S.

Page 3: CORPS OF ENGINEERS REGULATORY PROGRAM PUBLIC INTEREST REVIEW (33 CFR Part 320) August 12, 2005

Factors to Consider

– Cumulative impacts– Conservation– Economics– Aesthetics– General environmental

concerns– Wetlands– Historic properties– Fish and wildlife values– Flood hazards– Floodplain values– Land use– Navigation

– Shore erosion and accretion

– Recreation– Water supply and

conservation– Water quality– Energy needs– Safety– Food and fiber

production– Mineral needs– Private property

ownership– Needs and

welfare of the people

Page 4: CORPS OF ENGINEERS REGULATORY PROGRAM PUBLIC INTEREST REVIEW (33 CFR Part 320) August 12, 2005

Public Interest Evaluation

Historical PerspectiveZabel v. Tabb

430 F. 2D 199(5th Cir. 1970)

• Dec. 31, 1966 - Denial recommendation• Feb. 28, 1967 - Permit Denied• May 10, 1967 - Lawsuit filed• Dec. 18, 1968 -“Public Interest” added to Reg.

Program• Feb. 17, 1969 - District Court ruled against Corps• Jul. 16, 1970 - 5th Circuit court upheld Corps denial

RESULT: PUBLIC INTEREST REVIEW A VALID CORPS PROCEDURE

Page 5: CORPS OF ENGINEERS REGULATORY PROGRAM PUBLIC INTEREST REVIEW (33 CFR Part 320) August 12, 2005

Public Interest EvaluationZabel v. Tabb

TTTHHHEEE 555TTTHHH CCCIIIRRRCCCUUUIIITTT SSSTTTAAATTTEEESSS:::

...nothing in the statutory structure compels the Secretary [of the Army] to close his eyes to all that others see or think they see. The [Corps] was entitled, if not required,to consider ecological factors and,being persuaded by them, to deny that which might have been granted routinely five, ten or fifteen years ago before man's explosive increase made all, including Congress, aware of civilization's potential destruction from breathing its own polluted air and drinking its own infected water and the immeasurable loss from a silent spring-like-disturbance of nature's economy.

Page 6: CORPS OF ENGINEERS REGULATORY PROGRAM PUBLIC INTEREST REVIEW (33 CFR Part 320) August 12, 2005
Page 7: CORPS OF ENGINEERS REGULATORY PROGRAM PUBLIC INTEREST REVIEW (33 CFR Part 320) August 12, 2005

Balancing Test

• Benefits versus detriments

• Public and private need

• Extent and permanence of benefits and detriments

Page 8: CORPS OF ENGINEERS REGULATORY PROGRAM PUBLIC INTEREST REVIEW (33 CFR Part 320) August 12, 2005

Where’s the Corps Regulatory Program…

Must first define Scope of Analysis

Page 9: CORPS OF ENGINEERS REGULATORY PROGRAM PUBLIC INTEREST REVIEW (33 CFR Part 320) August 12, 2005

Scope of Analysis

• Determine the Corps Federal action area (permit area)

• Determine how the Corps will evaluate indirect (secondary) adverse environmental effects as well as cumulative effects

Page 10: CORPS OF ENGINEERS REGULATORY PROGRAM PUBLIC INTEREST REVIEW (33 CFR Part 320) August 12, 2005

Scope of AnalysisPermit Area

• All waters of the United States, as well as any additional area of non-waters where the Corps determines there is adequate federal control and responsibility

• Area of jurisdiction + Areas where impacts are caused by (or “a product of”) the Corps permitted activity

Page 11: CORPS OF ENGINEERS REGULATORY PROGRAM PUBLIC INTEREST REVIEW (33 CFR Part 320) August 12, 2005

Permit Area

Permit Area for a Simple Road Crossing

• No Federal Involvement Other Than Corps Permit

• No Other Impacts in Waters of U.S.

• Permit Area Limited to Directly-Affected Waters of U.S., and Uplands in

Immediate Vicinity Affecting/Affected by Regulated Activity

(e.g., Adjacent Road Alignments, Clearing for

Staging Area, Equipment Access, etc.)

Page 12: CORPS OF ENGINEERS REGULATORY PROGRAM PUBLIC INTEREST REVIEW (33 CFR Part 320) August 12, 2005

5 mi.

Permit Area for Multiple Road Crossings

NWR

• Substantial Federal Control (Corps permit + NWR Land)• Substantial Impacts (Waters of U.S., Endangered Species,

Cultural Resources)• Large Permit Area

Permit Area

Page 13: CORPS OF ENGINEERS REGULATORY PROGRAM PUBLIC INTEREST REVIEW (33 CFR Part 320) August 12, 2005

Public Interest Factors

• In Dec. 1968, there were 7 public interest factors – navigation, fish and wildlife, conservation, pollution,

aesthetics, ecology, general public interest

• In Nov. 1986 (current regs) - 22 public interest factors

• Not limited to just these public interest factors - must consider all relevant factors

Page 14: CORPS OF ENGINEERS REGULATORY PROGRAM PUBLIC INTEREST REVIEW (33 CFR Part 320) August 12, 2005

Public Interest Evaluation

What criteria must be considered on every application ?

• Public and private need

• Alternatives when unresolved conflict exists

• Extent and permanence of benefits and detriments on public and private uses

Source: 33 CFR 320.4(a)(2)(i)-(iii)

Page 15: CORPS OF ENGINEERS REGULATORY PROGRAM PUBLIC INTEREST REVIEW (33 CFR Part 320) August 12, 2005

Factors to Consider

– Cumulative impacts– Conservation– Economics– Aesthetics– General environmental

concerns– Wetlands– Historic properties– Fish and wildlife values– Flood hazards– Floodplain values– Land use– Navigation

– Shore erosion and accretion

– Recreation– Water supply and

conservation– Water quality– Energy needs– Safety– Food and fiber

production– Mineral needs– Private property

ownership– Needs and

welfare of the people

Page 16: CORPS OF ENGINEERS REGULATORY PROGRAM PUBLIC INTEREST REVIEW (33 CFR Part 320) August 12, 2005

Factor Importance

• Weighted according to relevance• Some factors more important

than others– Wetlands - Part 320.4 (b)(4)– Water Quality – Part 320.4(d)– Property Ownership – Part 320.4(g)– Mitigation - Part 320.4(r)

Page 17: CORPS OF ENGINEERS REGULATORY PROGRAM PUBLIC INTEREST REVIEW (33 CFR Part 320) August 12, 2005

Factor: Wetlands

• Regs assume most wetlands are valuable, and unnecessary destruction contrary to public interest

• Permit granted in important wetlands only if benefits outweigh damages (320.4(b)(4))

• Must apply 404(b)(1) Guidelines to discharges in wetlands

• Unique and scarce wetlands to region or local area considered important wetlands (320.4(b)(2)(viii))

• Must consider cumulative impacts

Page 18: CORPS OF ENGINEERS REGULATORY PROGRAM PUBLIC INTEREST REVIEW (33 CFR Part 320) August 12, 2005

Factor: Water Quality

• State 401 certification or waiver required for 404 discharges

• 401 denial is grounds for denial without prejudice

• Point source AND non-point source pollution considered

• 401 certification conditions will become special conditions to Corps permit

Page 19: CORPS OF ENGINEERS REGULATORY PROGRAM PUBLIC INTEREST REVIEW (33 CFR Part 320) August 12, 2005

Factor: Property Ownership

• Protection of property will usually receive favorable consideration

• Consider ALTERNATIVES if protection will affect other public interest factors

• Interference with navigation is grounds for permit denial

• Consider alternatives if it interferes with authorized Federal project (RGL 84-17).

Page 20: CORPS OF ENGINEERS REGULATORY PROGRAM PUBLIC INTEREST REVIEW (33 CFR Part 320) August 12, 2005

Factor: Mitigation

• Mitigation is an important aspect of the review and balancing process on many permit applications

• Consideration of mitigation will occur throughout the permit application process

• Includes avoiding, minimizing, rectifying, reducing, or compensating for resource losses

• Mitigation may be required as a result of the public interest review process

Page 21: CORPS OF ENGINEERS REGULATORY PROGRAM PUBLIC INTEREST REVIEW (33 CFR Part 320) August 12, 2005

Decision

• A permit will be issued unless the project is contrary to the public interest

• Compliance with 404(b)(1)/NEPA• Resolution of NHPA/ESA/State issues• Decision

– Permit issued as proposed– Permit issued with special conditions– Permit denied

Page 22: CORPS OF ENGINEERS REGULATORY PROGRAM PUBLIC INTEREST REVIEW (33 CFR Part 320) August 12, 2005

Questions?

James M. TownsendChief, Regulatory Branch

Louisville DistrictP.O. Box 59

Louisville, KY 40201-0059502-315-6675