View
215
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Coronal Loop Oscillations Seen in Unprecedented Detail by
SDO/AIA
Rebecca White and Erwin Verwichte
University of Warwick, Centre for Fusion, Space and Astrophysics, Coventry, CV4 7AL
BUKS 2011
28th June 2011
Introduction
• Coronal loop oscillations are interpreted as the fast kink mode.
• Observations of coronal loop oscillations since 1998, majority with TRACE e.g.
- Nakariakov et al 1999
- Aschwanden et al 1999
- Verwichte et al 2004, 2010
- Van Doorsselaere et al 2007
• Launch of SDO in 2010 carrying the Atmospheric Imaging Assembly (AIA) instrument.
- 7 EUV band passes (94Å - 335 Å)
- Continuous full disk images
- Spatial resolution 1.5″, time cadence ~ 12s
Motivation:
• Study multiple loops in the same event.
• Combine AIA/SDO data with EUVI/STEREO data to obtain the 3D
loop geometry.
• The short time cadence of AIA may allow shorter period oscillations to
be observed.
• Application of seismology techniques to the fast kink mode:
- Used to probe local properties of the coronal plasma
such as the magnetic field.
Introduction
• 3 events studied in the 171Å bandpass • Oscillations triggered by a flare/CME event.
• 11 loops studied• 3D information using STEREO obtained for 6 loops
Observations
M1.0 GOES flare C4.9 GOES flare
Time Series Analysis
• Cuts made perpendicular to the loops.
• Loop features enhanced by applying a 2D wavelet transform.
• Gaussian plus background profile fitted to the flux at each time to attempt to automatically locate the loop position.
• Damped cosine function fitted to the resulting time series after background subtraction:
Intensity Oscillations• Intensity obtained from the cuts using
the time series points.
• Reliably observed for 6 loops.
• Possible explanation of intensity variations:
– Variations of line of sight column depth. Verwichte et al. (2009)
– Vertically polarised mode. Wang and Solanki (2004)
– Non linear coupling of the kink mode to a slow magnetoacoustic mode. Terradas and Ofman (2004)
– Linear coupling of the kink mode to a slow magnetoacoustic mode. Terradas et al. (2011)
2 3 4 5
Intensity Oscillations
Intensity amplitude increases with displacement amplitude for this loop.
→ Consistent with l.o.s variations.
2 3
54
ResultsEvent 1 (13 June 2010):
Intensity oscillations:
• Periods between 3.55 minutes and 3.75 minutes for displacement time series.
• Periods of 3.58 minutes and 4.12 minutes for intensity oscillations.
ResultsEvent 2 (02 August 2010):
Intensity oscillations:
• Periods of 8.67 minutes and 9.93 minutes for displacement time series.
• Periods of 9.17 minutes and 10.2 minutes for intensity oscillations.
ResultsEvent 3 (03 November 2010):
• Period scales with loop length and possibly footpoint distance from the event.
• Periods of less than 2 minutes found for loops 4 and 5.
Intensity oscillations:
DEM Analysis
• Differential emission measure distribution analysis
technique. Aschwanden, (2011)
• First estimate of the average magnetic field strength
made by estimating the density contrast in the 171Å
bandpass:
B = 16.72 ± 3.34 G
Conclusions and Future Work
• Performed the analysis of 11 coronal loop oscillations, determining periods,
damping times and phases.
- 3D geometry obtained for 6 loops using EUVI/STEREO.
- DEM analysis to be applied to suitable loops.
• Oscillations with periods of less than 2 minutes observed.
• Intensity oscillations reliably observed in 6 of the loops.
- Most likely due to line of sight effect but other possibilities cannot
be ruled out.
• Seismology techniques are to be applied to the kink mode e.g Goossens et
al 2008, Nakariakov and Ofman 2001.