44
Coral Health and Disease in the Face of Climate Change Kim B. Ritchie Mote Marine Laboratory, Sarasota Florida

Coral Health and Disease in the Face of Climate Change/media/Files/Activity Files/PublicHealth... · Coral Health and Disease in the Face of Climate Change Kim B. Ritchie ... •

  • Upload
    lequynh

  • View
    214

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Coral Health and Disease

in the Face of Climate Change

Kim B. Ritchie

Mote Marine Laboratory, Sarasota Florida

Coral-Symbiodinium-Bacterial Interactions

Coral algal endosymbiont = “Zooxanthellae” =

Symbiodinium spp.

Vibrio shifts

Microbial Shift During Bleaching R

ela

tive %

Before

bleaching

During

bleaching Bleached

During

recovery

Completely

recovered

Ritchie and Smith, 2004

Ritchie (2006) MEPS 322:1-14

Mucus from the elkhorn coral inhibits the growth

of many bacteria

Growth

medium

Growth

medium

+Sterile

Mucus

Control mucus treated

Measure growth inhibition on

mucus-treated plates

Mucus Inhibition Range

• Coral mucus is active against Gram

negative and Gram positive tester strains

• E. coli, Serratia marcescens, Salmonella,

Shigella

• Enterococcus faecalis, Bacillus subtilis,

Staphylococcus aureus

Ritchie (2006) MEPS 322:1-14

Bacillus

MRSA

S. aureus Streptococcus

Pseudomonas

Antibiotic Spectrum Screening

MRSA, MSSA, VRE, Enterococcus facaelis, E.coli O157:H7, S. typhimurium, Bacillus subtilis, Shigella, Serratia marcescens Agrobacterium tumefaciens

Antibiotic producers

• Of 776 tested, roughly 20% of cultured

isolates produce antibacterials against one

or more tester strains

• Potentially a much higher percentage

Ritchie (2006)

Shnit-Orland and Kushmaro (2008)

Impact of Seasonality on Bacterial dynamics

in Acropora palmata

• Mucus from A. palmata has

antibiotic activity that is lost

when temperatures increase

• A. palmata harbors antibiotic-producing bacteria that are lost

or replaced by potentially

pathogenic bacteria as temps

increase

Ritchie (2006) MEPS 322:1-14

• May explain why corals are more susceptible to disease during warming trends

Coral Surface

coral surface

mucus layer

water column

Coral Surface

coral surface

mucus layer

water column

Increased

Sea Surface

Temperature

Increase in

diseases

and bleaching

( ( ) )

( )

(1 )

N P S

PP

S

S

dN NI b A P b S N

dt K N

b A PNdPI P

dt K N

b SNdSS

dt K N

b SNdAA

dt K N

Mao-Jones et al, 2010, PLoS Biology

,P Sb b

: maximum growth rates of pathogen and beneficial bacteria.

K : half-saturation constant for nutrient uptake

: mucus sloughing-off rate

: fraction of nutrient uptake that beneficial bacteria use to make antibiotics.

Impact of seasonality on pathogen dynamics

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Apr

-05

May

-05

Jun-

05

Jul-0

5

Aug

-05

Sep

-05

1/1/

2006

Feb-0

6

Mar

-06

Apr

-06

May

-06

Jun-

06

Jul-0

6

Aug

-06

% V

ibri

os

15

17

19

21

23

25

27

29

31

Sea S

urf

ace T

em

p C

% Vibrios in mucus % Vibrios in water column mean SST

Hysteresis - pathogen adherence to and overgrowth in mucus results in

pathogen persistence even after conditions return to favorable conditions

for healthy state microbiota

Point

• Suggests a lag time in actual coral

recovery after a warming event.

• May explain why corals are more susceptible to disease during, and after, a warming trend

Antibiotic contributions to

coral mucus?

• Coral Host?

• Bacteria?

• Symbiodinium???

Symbiodinium spp.

• endosymbionts of many marine organisms – clams

– anemones

– Jellyfish

– Foraminifera, and others

• Subdivided into “clades” A, B, C, D, E, F, etc… – Appear evolutionarily distinct

– Different host niches

– Functionally diverse

Symbiodinium can be cultured

outside of the coral host

Plus antibiotics

Minus antibiotics

(Or over time)

No growth

Growth

Culturable bacteria associated with

Symbiodinium cultures

B1

Marine Agar GASWA Marine Agar GASWA

C1 D2

F2

A1

E1

Groups based on both

culture and molecular methods

Bacterial Groups Symbiodinium Clades

Roseobacter Clade A1, B1, C1, D1a, D2, E1, F2

Marinobacters A1, B1, C1, D1a, D2, E1, F2 aCFB Group A1, B1, C1, D2, F2

aCytophaga-Flavobacterium-Bacteroides (CFB)

Growth Curve

-200

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

Time elapsed after treatment (hrs)

Perc

en

t ch

an

ge i

n c

ell

den

sit

y

Control

Antibiotic

Roseobacter

Marinobacter

Hours

Cell

Counts

Bacillus

Many Roseobacters produce

antimicrobial compounds

Roseobacters are likely to be

important in coral biology

Are there roles for native bacteria in

coral health?

Teplitski and Ritchie, 2009

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Teplitski and Ritchie, TREE 2010

Antimicrobial functions on

coral surfaces

Experiments show that signals regulating microbiota are

produced in situ

Inhibit swarming and biofilm formation in a coral

pathogen, Serratia marscecens

Coral and Symbiodinium associated bacteria can inhibit

swarming and biofilm formation in coral pathogens

Alagely, Krediet, Ritchie, Teplitski. ISME J. 2011

reverse-phase C18 Si

or HP20SS resin

Biocontrol with native coral bacteria

Alagely, Krediet, Ritchie, Teplitski. ISME J. in press

Control

PDL

100

PDL100

Marino

PDL100

Roseo Marino Roseo

Model polyp

Aiptasia

pallida

What about bacteria in early life stages of

corals?

Broadcast

Spawners

Brooders

External

fertilization

Internal

fertilization

Planula larvae

(from Ritson-Williams et al. 2009)

Most corals acquire bacteria during early

life stages

• Most corals do not acquire bact until

post-settlement stages

(Sharp et al., 2010)

• Roseobacter clade bacteria are

consistently present in early life

stages of many corals (Apprill et al, 2009;

Ceh et al., 2010; Littman et al., 2011; Sharp et

al., 2011) (Sharp, et al., 2010)

At Least Two Groups of Bacteria Are

Consistently Associated P. astreoides Larvae

(Sharp et al., 2011)

Coral-associated Roseobacter clade (RCA) Coral-associated Marinobacter sp.

Two groups of bacteria present across all sampled larvae

4 years of sampling

3 locations across the Caribbean

full coverage of early development (from newly released until post-settlement)

SUGGESTS BACTERIA ARE TRANSMITTED VERTICALLY (parentally)

IN BROODING CORALS

Microbial biofilms are necessary for larval settlement

(Sharp and Ritchie, 2012)

Scoring Settlement of P. astreoides

• Swimming planula

• Swimming but metamorphosed

• Attached, settled, and

metamorphosed

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

30.00

35.00

40.00

45.00

SW Control MB Control Roseivivax Marinobacter Pseudoalteromonas

Me

an

Pe

rce

nt

Se

ttle

me

nt

Specific bacteria encourage coral

Porites astreoides larval settlement

n = 10

20 larvae per dish

Bars: SE

Bacteria mediate larval settlement in

several coral species

All Symbiodinium-associated Roseobacters

tested produce Gene Transfer Agents

All Symbiodinium-associated

alpha-proteobacteria tested

produce Gene Transfer Agents

(McDaniel et al, in review)

Gene Transfer Agents (GTAs)

•Resemble bacteriaphage

•Package random pieces of host genome

•First described in 1974 in

Rhodobacter capsulata

•Present in many alpha-

proteobacteria

Gene Transfer Agents (GTAs)

Found in genomes of many marine

Alpha-Proteobacteria

Host

Specificity

Factor (?)

oxid

ore

ducta

se

, FA

D-b

indin

g p

rote

in

Puta

tive

la

rge

te

rmin

ase

port

al pro

tein

, H

K97 f

am

ily p

rote

in

CO

G1196 C

hro

mosom

e s

egre

gation A

TP

ases

phage p

rohead p

rote

ase,

HK

97 f

am

ily p

rote

in

majo

r capsid

pro

tein

, H

K97 f

am

ily p

rote

in

head

-tail

adapto

r, p

uta

tive

majo

r ta

il pro

tein

, T

P901

-1 f

am

ily p

rote

in

puta

tive p

hage t

ail

min

or

pro

tein

CO

G0

79

1 C

ell

wa

ll-associa

ted h

ydro

lases (

invasio

n-a

ssocia

ted p

rote

ins)

serine O

-acety

ltra

nsfe

rase

2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000

Gene transfer via

GTAs is

100 million times

higher in the reef

environment

(McDaniel et al, Science, 2010)

Attached or Swimming Settled

Roseobacters and Gene Transfer Agents

greatly increase coral larvae settlement

Conclusions

• There are a number of bacteria associated with corals that produce antibiotics

• Many coral bacteria can inhibit coral pathogens (QS)

• Roseobacters and Marinobacters are likely important in coral biology, increase growth rates in Symbiodinium and increase coral larvae survival and settlement

• Roseobacters associated with corals and Symbiodinium produce Gene Transfer Agents that are capable of transferring genes to a variety of bacterial types

Questions

• What is the nature of these partnerships and what are the services provided?

• Are these associations stable?

• Are genes transferred

to corals or zoox?

Acknowledgements

• Koty Sharp, Ocean Genome Legacy

• Max Teplitski, UF

• Cory Krediet, UF

• John Paul, USF

• Lauren McDaniel, USF

• Valerie Paul, Smithsonian

• Chris Voolstra, KAUST