47
Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006

Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006. The Relevance of EHR Standards and of EHR Quality labelling for SMEs Alain Maskens

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006. The Relevance of EHR Standards and of EHR Quality labelling for SMEs Alain Maskens

Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006

Page 2: Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006. The Relevance of EHR Standards and of EHR Quality labelling for SMEs Alain Maskens

Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006

Page 3: Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006. The Relevance of EHR Standards and of EHR Quality labelling for SMEs Alain Maskens

Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006

The Relevance of

EHR Standards and of EHR Quality labelling

for SME’s

Alain Maskens

Page 4: Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006. The Relevance of EHR Standards and of EHR Quality labelling for SMEs Alain Maskens

Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006

HEALTHHEALTH one TM

Clinical Management, for life

The Relevance of

EHR Standards and of EHR Quality labelling

for SME’s

Alain Maskens

Page 5: Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006. The Relevance of EHR Standards and of EHR Quality labelling for SMEs Alain Maskens

Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006

Contents

• Certification requirements: examples– Generic requirements– Specific requirements

• Certification << >> Standards• Advantages for SMEs• Issues for SMEs• What should SMEs do?

Page 6: Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006. The Relevance of EHR Standards and of EHR Quality labelling for SMEs Alain Maskens

Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006

U.S.A.: certification criteria: excerpt

Page 7: Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006. The Relevance of EHR Standards and of EHR Quality labelling for SMEs Alain Maskens

Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006

5. “The system shall record the identity of the user finalizing each note and the date and time of finalization.

…7. The system shall provide the ability to addend

and/or correct notes that have been finalized.8. The system shall record and display the identity

of the user who addended or corrected a note, as well as other attributes of the addenda or correction, such as the date and time of the change.”

U.S.A.: certification criteria: excerpt

Page 8: Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006. The Relevance of EHR Standards and of EHR Quality labelling for SMEs Alain Maskens

Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006

Belgium: certification criteria: excerpt

Page 9: Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006. The Relevance of EHR Standards and of EHR Quality labelling for SMEs Alain Maskens

Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006

- « Le système doit pouvoir reconstituer l'historique des versions successives d'une donnée, gérées selon les règles suivantes :

- Chaque version de donnée est associée à un auteur et un moment (date, heure) d'enregistrement.

- Chaque modification d'une donnée (à l'exception des notes personnelles du médecin) en génère une nouvelle version. Dans ce cas, la suppression d'une donnée doit être considérée comme une modification et ne peut entraîner la perte physique de cette donnée.”

Belgium: certification criteria: excerpt

Page 10: Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006. The Relevance of EHR Standards and of EHR Quality labelling for SMEs Alain Maskens

Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006

CEN TC251prEN13606-1

Page 11: Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006. The Relevance of EHR Standards and of EHR Quality labelling for SMEs Alain Maskens

Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006

CEN TC251EN13606

Page 12: Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006. The Relevance of EHR Standards and of EHR Quality labelling for SMEs Alain Maskens

Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006

pr EN 13606 – 1: Requirements basis for this

EHR communication standard

“Many investigations of user and enterprise requirements for the EHR have taken place over this period, which have sought to span the information needs of diverse specialties across primary, secondary and tertiary care, between professions and across countries. These requirements have been distilled and analysed by expert groups, mainly within Europe, in order to identify the basic information that must be accommodated within an EHR information architecture”

Page 13: Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006. The Relevance of EHR Standards and of EHR Quality labelling for SMEs Alain Maskens

Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006

“This work includes the GEHR, EHCR-SupA, Synapses, I4C and Nora projects and work by SPRI. These key requirements publications are listed in the bibliography in Annex F. These requirements have recently been consolidated on the international stage within an ISO Technical Specification, ISO TS 18308”.

pr EN 13606 – 1: Requirements basis for this

EHR communication standard

Page 14: Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006. The Relevance of EHR Standards and of EHR Quality labelling for SMEs Alain Maskens

Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006

The GEHR (Good European Electronic Healthcare Record) Architecture

Page 15: Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006. The Relevance of EHR Standards and of EHR Quality labelling for SMEs Alain Maskens

Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006

GEHR: requirements for clinical comprehensiveness

« Author Responsibility• It is widely recognised that every entry in the

record must be attributed to an author. What is displayed in the record should be a true account of events as recorded by the author. If changes need to be made, it must be possible to step through and account for those changes individually within a rigorous audit trail. »

Page 16: Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006. The Relevance of EHR Standards and of EHR Quality labelling for SMEs Alain Maskens

Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006

« Recording a Transaction• A new Transaction will incorporate the

identifier of the responsible clinician, the date/time of the Transaction, and the type of the Transaction. If an amendment has occurred, then the amendment version, the identifier of the amending clinician and the date/time of the amendment will also be documented. »

GEHR: functional specifications

Page 17: Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006. The Relevance of EHR Standards and of EHR Quality labelling for SMEs Alain Maskens

Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006

Specific requirements

Page 18: Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006. The Relevance of EHR Standards and of EHR Quality labelling for SMEs Alain Maskens

Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006

Specific requirements

CCHIT : The system shall associate standard codes withdiscrete data elements in a note. Examples include but are not limited to SNOMED-CT, ICD-9CM, DSM-IV, CPT-4, MEDCIN, and LOINC. This would allow symptoms to be associated with SNOMED terms, labs with LOINC codes, etc.

Page 19: Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006. The Relevance of EHR Standards and of EHR Quality labelling for SMEs Alain Maskens

Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006

Specific requirements

CCHIT : The system shall associate standard codes withdiscrete data elements in a note. Examples include but are not limited to SNOMED-CT, ICD-9CM, DSM-IV, CPT-4, MEDCIN, and LOINC. This would allow symptoms to be associated with SNOMED terms, labs with LOINC codes, etc.

Belgium: Les codes associés au contenu sont issus soit de la classification CISP-2 et/ou ICD-10 (voir les critères 54 et 55), soit d'un système de codification de référence ou propriétaire. En cas de codage propriétaire, le logiciel offre en plus une correspondance vers la classification CISP-2 et/ou ICD-10.

Page 20: Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006. The Relevance of EHR Standards and of EHR Quality labelling for SMEs Alain Maskens

Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006

GEHR: requirements for clinical comprehensiveness

“There are many classification systems used in medicine, and a shared healthcare record must allow use of any one or all of these systems. They are usually designed for a specific purpose and may be used in specific or general settings”.

Page 21: Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006. The Relevance of EHR Standards and of EHR Quality labelling for SMEs Alain Maskens

Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006

Page 22: Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006. The Relevance of EHR Standards and of EHR Quality labelling for SMEs Alain Maskens

Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006

Quality labelling (certification) and standards

Page 23: Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006. The Relevance of EHR Standards and of EHR Quality labelling for SMEs Alain Maskens

Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006

Quality labelling (certification) and standards

certification

Page 24: Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006. The Relevance of EHR Standards and of EHR Quality labelling for SMEs Alain Maskens

Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006

Quality labelling (certification) and standards

certification

User requirements•generic•specific

Page 25: Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006. The Relevance of EHR Standards and of EHR Quality labelling for SMEs Alain Maskens

Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006

Quality labelling (certification) and standards

certification

User requirements•generic•specific

Standards

Page 26: Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006. The Relevance of EHR Standards and of EHR Quality labelling for SMEs Alain Maskens

Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006

Quality labelling (certification) and standards

certification

User requirements•generic•specific

Standards

Page 27: Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006. The Relevance of EHR Standards and of EHR Quality labelling for SMEs Alain Maskens

Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006

Quality labelling (certification) and standards

certification

User requirements•generic•specific

Standards

Research and development

Page 28: Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006. The Relevance of EHR Standards and of EHR Quality labelling for SMEs Alain Maskens

Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006

Quality labelling (certification) and standards

certification

User requirements•generic•specific

Standards

Research and development

Page 29: Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006. The Relevance of EHR Standards and of EHR Quality labelling for SMEs Alain Maskens

Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006

Advantages: Certification and standards

Page 30: Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006. The Relevance of EHR Standards and of EHR Quality labelling for SMEs Alain Maskens

Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006

Advantages: Certification and standards

• Offer a rigorous analysis of market requirements

Page 31: Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006. The Relevance of EHR Standards and of EHR Quality labelling for SMEs Alain Maskens

Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006

Advantages: Certification and standards

• Offer a rigorous analysis of market requirements• Offer the results of extensive, multidisciplinary

R&D work (architectures, specifications)

Page 32: Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006. The Relevance of EHR Standards and of EHR Quality labelling for SMEs Alain Maskens

Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006

Advantages: Certification and standards

• Offer a rigorous analysis of market requirements• Offer the results of extensive, multidisciplinary

R&D work (architectures, specifications)• Offer protection against the imposition of « de

facto standards » by big industrial players

Page 33: Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006. The Relevance of EHR Standards and of EHR Quality labelling for SMEs Alain Maskens

Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006

Advantages: Certification and standards

• Offer a rigorous analysis of market requirements• Offer the results of extensive, multidisciplinary

R&D work (architectures, specifications)• Offer protection against the imposition of « de

facto standards » by big industrial players• Offer the same level of visibility for small and

large players

Page 34: Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006. The Relevance of EHR Standards and of EHR Quality labelling for SMEs Alain Maskens

Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006

Difficulties

Page 35: Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006. The Relevance of EHR Standards and of EHR Quality labelling for SMEs Alain Maskens

Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006

Difficulties

• Discrepancy between market demand / maturity and standards sophistication

Page 36: Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006. The Relevance of EHR Standards and of EHR Quality labelling for SMEs Alain Maskens

Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006

Difficulties

• Discrepancy between market demand / maturity and standards sophistication

• Instability of the standards

Page 37: Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006. The Relevance of EHR Standards and of EHR Quality labelling for SMEs Alain Maskens

Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006

Difficulties

• Discrepancy between market demand / maturity and standards sophistication

• Instability of the standards• Multiplicity of the standards

Page 38: Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006. The Relevance of EHR Standards and of EHR Quality labelling for SMEs Alain Maskens

Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006

Difficulties

• Discrepancy between market demand / maturity and standards sophistication

• Instability of the standards• Multiplicity of the standards• Ongoing cohorts of customers..

Page 39: Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006. The Relevance of EHR Standards and of EHR Quality labelling for SMEs Alain Maskens

Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006

Main issue:

• Ongoing cohorts of existing customers..

Page 40: Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006. The Relevance of EHR Standards and of EHR Quality labelling for SMEs Alain Maskens

Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006

SME strategy

• Take advantage of requirements analysis provided by GEHR and complementary projects – Comprehensiveness– Communication capacity– Portability and independence

• Take advantage of GEHR generic architecture concepts

Page 41: Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006. The Relevance of EHR Standards and of EHR Quality labelling for SMEs Alain Maskens

Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006

SME strategy

– Comprehensiveness and expandability of the data architecture – the constraints must be at a higher level

– Terminology independence – Standards compatibility / standards independence – Internal inter-operability

HEALTH one Global:

Page 42: Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006. The Relevance of EHR Standards and of EHR Quality labelling for SMEs Alain Maskens

Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006

South Africa

The AIDS team, AngloPlatinum healthcare services,

South Africa

Page 43: Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006. The Relevance of EHR Standards and of EHR Quality labelling for SMEs Alain Maskens

Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006

USA

The Madrona Clinic, Whashington State, USA

Page 44: Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006. The Relevance of EHR Standards and of EHR Quality labelling for SMEs Alain Maskens

Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006

Europe

Clinique Sainte-AnneSaint-Remy, Brussels

Page 45: Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006. The Relevance of EHR Standards and of EHR Quality labelling for SMEs Alain Maskens

Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006

Shanghai

Page 46: Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006. The Relevance of EHR Standards and of EHR Quality labelling for SMEs Alain Maskens

Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006

Page 47: Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006. The Relevance of EHR Standards and of EHR Quality labelling for SMEs Alain Maskens

Copyright HEALTHone Global – October 2006