42
Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies 21-1 21 Pure Competition

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies 21-1 21 Pure Competition

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies 21-1 21 Pure Competition

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies21-1

21PureCompetition

Page 2: Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies 21-1 21 Pure Competition

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies21-2

Chapter Objectives• Names and Main Characteristics of

the Four Basic Market Models• Conditions for Perfect Competition• How Do Purely Competitive Firms

Maximize Profits or Minimize Losses

• How Industry Entry and Exit Create Economic Efficiency

• Differences Between Constant-Cost, Increasing-Cost, and Decreasing-Cost Industries

Page 3: Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies 21-1 21 Pure Competition

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies21-3

Market structure

• In past chapters we have discussed demand, revenue, and production costs: would now like to ask, what amount of output should a firm produce and what price should they charge?

• Answer will depend very much on the structure of the industry the firm operates in.

• We have 4 models of industry structure.

Page 4: Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies 21-1 21 Pure Competition

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies21-4

Four Market Models• Pure Competition

• Pure Monopoly

• Monopolistic Competition

• Oligopoly

Market Structure Continuum

PureCompetition

MonopolisticCompetition Oligopoly

PureMonopoly

Imperfect Competition

Page 5: Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies 21-1 21 Pure Competition

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies21-5

Characteristics of Pure Competition

• Very Large Numbers of sellers and buyers

• Standardized or homogenous Product

• Firm becomes a “Price Taker”• Free Entry and Exit• Some books add in perfect

information also (then called perfect competition)

Graphically…

Page 6: Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies 21-1 21 Pure Competition

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies21-6

The Market and the firm in Perfect Competition

The Market

PSD

Individual firm

P

P=MR

6

Page 7: Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies 21-1 21 Pure Competition

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies21-7

Why does a Perfectly Competitive firm face a horizontal demand curve?

• Because it can sell all it brings to market at the market price, therefore P always equals MR: thus the horizontal price line equals MR to the firm, and is effectively like a demand curve to the firm.

Page 8: Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies 21-1 21 Pure Competition

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies21-8

The firm in Perfect CompetitionThe firm in Perfect Competition

8

P

Q1

P = MR

Page 9: Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies 21-1 21 Pure Competition

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies21-9

Profit maximization in the short run

• Since the firm in pure competition does not control price, the question becomes what output should be produced in order to maximize profits?

• Two approaches:• 1. Total revenue, total cost approach: find the

output at which TR exceeds TC by the greatest possible amount.

• 2. Marginal revenue, marginal cost approach: find the output at which MR equals MC.

• Mostly we will stress the latter appoach.

Page 10: Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies 21-1 21 Pure Competition

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies21-10

Firm’sDemandSchedule(AverageRevenue)

Firm’sRevenue

Data

Pure Competition: TR, TC approach

Pri

ce a

nd

Rev

enu

e

2 4 6 8 10 12

131

262

393

524

655

786

917

1048

$1179

Quantity Demanded (Sold)

D = MR = AR

TR

P QDTR MR

$131131131131131131131131131131131

0123456789

10

$0131262393524655786917

104811791310

$131131131131131131131131131131

]]]]]]]]]]

Page 11: Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies 21-1 21 Pure Competition

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies21-11

Total Revenue-Total Cost Approach

Profit Maximization in the Short Run

(1)Total Product(Output) (Q)

(2)Total FixedCost (TFC)

(3)Total Variable

Cost (TVC)

(4)Total Cost

(TC)

(5)Total Revenue

(TR)

(6)Profit (+)

or Loss (-)

Price = $131

0123456789

10

$100100100100100100100100100100100

$090

170240300370450540650780930

$100190270340400470550640750880

1030

$0131262393524655786917

104811791310

$-100-59-8

+53+124+185+236+277+298+299+280

Now Let’s Graph The Results…Do You See Profit Maximization?

Page 12: Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies 21-1 21 Pure Competition

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies21-12

Total Revenue-Total Cost Approach

Profit Maximization in the Short Run

10 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1213 14

10 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1213 14

$180017001600150014001300120011001000

900800700600500400300200100

$500400300200100

To

tal

Re

ven

ue

and

To

tal

Co

stT

ota

l E

con

om

icP

rofi

t

Quantity Demanded (Sold)

Quantity Demanded (Sold)

Total Revenue, (TR)

Break-Even Point(Normal Profit)

Break-Even Point(Normal Profit)

MaximumEconomic

Profit$299

Total EconomicProfit

$299

P=$131

Total Cost,(TC)

W 21.1

G 21.1

Page 13: Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies 21-1 21 Pure Competition

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies21-13

Profit Maximization in the Short Run: MR = MC approach

• Firm should produce an output where MR=MC. Why?

• (Note also that this rule can be used for all market structures.)

Page 14: Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies 21-1 21 Pure Competition

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies21-14

MC

The firm in Perfect CompetitionThe firm in Perfect Competition

14

P

Q1

P = MR

Page 15: Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies 21-1 21 Pure Competition

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies21-15

Profit Maximization in the Short Run: MR = MC approach

• If the firm produced less than Q1, then MR would exceed MC: could increase profit by expanding ouput.

• If the firm more than than Q1, then MC would exceed MR: could increase profit by contracting ouput.

• The combination of these leads to the MR=MC rule.• Is the firm actually making a profit, a loss, or breaking

even? Need to add the ATC curve to the graph in order to show this.

Page 16: Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies 21-1 21 Pure Competition

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies21-16

ATC

MC

Positive profits in Perfect CompetitionPositive profits in Perfect Competition

16

P

Q1

P = MR

P > ATC

Profit

Page 17: Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies 21-1 21 Pure Competition

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies21-17

ATC

MC

Losses in Perfect CompetitionLosses in Perfect Competition

17

P

Q1

P = MR

P < ATC

Losses

Page 18: Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies 21-1 21 Pure Competition

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies21-18

ATC

MC

Zero Profits in Perfect CompetitionZero Profits in Perfect Competition

18

P

Q1

P = MR

P = ATC

Page 19: Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies 21-1 21 Pure Competition

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies21-19

Marginal Revenue-Marginal Cost ApproachMR = MC Rule

Profit Maximization in the Short Run

(1)Total

Product(Output)

(2)Average

FixedCost(AFC)

(3)AverageVariable

Cost(AVC)

(4)Average

TotalCost(ATC)

(6)MarginalRevenue

(MR)

(7)Profit (+)

or Loss (-)

0123456789

10

$100.0050.0033.3325.0020.0016.6714.2912.5011.1110.00

$90.0085.0080.0075.0074.0075.0077.1481.2586.6793.00

$190.00135.00113.33100.00

94.0091.6791.4393.7597.78

103.00

$131131131131131131131131131131

$-100-59-8

+53+124+185+236+277+298+299+280

No Surprise - Now Let’s Graph It…Do You See Profit Maximization Now?

(5)Marginal

Cost(MC)

$90807060708090

110130150

Page 20: Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies 21-1 21 Pure Competition

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies21-20

Co

st a

nd

Rev

enu

e$200

150

100

50

01 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Output

Economic Profit

Marginal Revenue-Marginal Cost ApproachMR = MC Rule

Profit Maximization in the Short Run

MR = P

MCMR = MC

AVC

ATC

P=$131

A=$97.78

W 21.2

Page 21: Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies 21-1 21 Pure Competition

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies21-21

Lower the Price to $81 andObserve the Results!

Co

st a

nd

Rev

enu

e$200

150

100

50

01 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Output

Loss

Marginal Revenue-Marginal Cost ApproachMR = MC Rule

Profit Maximization in the Short Run

MR = P

MC

AVCATC

Loss Minimizing Case

P=$81

A=$91.67

V = $75

Page 22: Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies 21-1 21 Pure Competition

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies21-22

Lower the Price Further to $71 and Observe the Results!

Co

st a

nd

Rev

enu

e$200

150

100

50

01 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Output

Marginal Revenue-Marginal Cost ApproachMR = MC Rule

Profit Maximization in the Short Run

MR = P

MC

AVC

ATC

Short-Run Shut Down Case

P=$71Short-Run

Shut Down PointP < Minimum AVC

$71 < $74

V = $74

Page 23: Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies 21-1 21 Pure Competition

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies21-23

Marginal Cost and Short-Run Supply

Continuing the Same Numeric Example…

Supply Schedule of a Competitive Firm

PriceQuantitySupplied

Maximum Profit (+)or Minimum Loss (-)

$151131111

91817161

10987600

$+480+299+138

-3-64

-100-100

The Schedule Shows the Quantity a FirmWill Produce at a Variety of Prices and Results

Page 24: Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies 21-1 21 Pure Competition

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies21-24

Marginal Cost and Short-Run Supply

Generalizing the MR=MC Relationship and its Use

P1

0

Co

st a

nd

Rev

enu

es (

Do

llars

)

Quantity Supplied

MR1

P2 MR2

P3 MR3

P4 MR4

P5 MR5

MC

AVC

ATC

Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5

This Price is Below AVCNo output should Be Produced

ab

c

d

e

Page 25: Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies 21-1 21 Pure Competition

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies21-25

Marginal Cost and Short-Run Supply

Generalizing the MR=MC Relationship and its Use

P1

0

Co

st a

nd

Rev

enu

es (

Do

llars

)

Quantity Supplied

MR1

P2 MR2

P3 MR3

P4 MR4

P5 MR5

MC

AVC

ATC

Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5

This Price is Below AVCNo output should Be Produced

ab

c

d

e

MC Above AVC Becomesthe Short-Run Supply Curve S

Examine the MC for the Competitive Firm

Break-even(Normal Profit) Point

Shut-Down Point (If P is Below)

Page 26: Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies 21-1 21 Pure Competition

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies21-26

Why is a firm’s MC curve above its AVC curve its Supply Curve?

• Because it always produces where

MR = MC, except when price is below AVC

Page 27: Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies 21-1 21 Pure Competition

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies21-27

Why don’t we include the MC curve below its AVC curve as a part of its

Supply Curve?

• Because below the AVC the firm will close down

Page 28: Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies 21-1 21 Pure Competition

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies21-28

What is the Market’s Supply Curve?

• It is the aggregation or sum of the short run MC curves of the firm’s in the market

Page 29: Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies 21-1 21 Pure Competition

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies21-29

Single Firm Industryp P

p P0 0

Changes in Supply

EconomicProfit

d

ATC

AVC

s = MC

$111 $111

D

S = ∑ MC’s

8 8000

Competitive Firm Must Take the Price that isEstablished By Industry Supply and Demand

W 21.3

Page 30: Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies 21-1 21 Pure Competition

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies21-30

Profit Maximization in the Long Run

• Assumptions–Entry and Exit Only–Identical Costs–Constant-Cost Industry

• Goal of the Analysis• Long-Run Equilibrium

–Entry Eliminates Profits–Exit Eliminates Losses

Page 31: Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies 21-1 21 Pure Competition

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies21-31

The Long Run adjustments in Perfect Competition

The Market Individual firm 31

PSD P

P=MR

MC

ATC

D1

S1

P

P1

Q Q1

Page 32: Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies 21-1 21 Pure Competition

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies21-32

Explanation of long run adjustments

Start at price P, typical firm making zero profits

Suppose demand increases to D1

Price rises to P1 Typical firm making positive profits What happens in the long run? Assuming perfect information and free

entry, new firms enter the market Supply shifts right until profits eliminated Price comes down—but how far depends

on whether costs are affected

Page 33: Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies 21-1 21 Pure Competition

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies21-33

Long Run, continued

Constant cost industry: no change in costs as new firms enter the market, price returns to P, original price

Increasing cost industry: all firms experience rising costs as new firms enter the market, final price will be higher than original price P

Decreasing cost industry: all firms experience lower costs as new firms enter the market, final price will be lower than original price

Page 34: Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies 21-1 21 Pure Competition

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies21-34

Single Firm Industryp P

p P0 0100 90,00080,000 100,000

Supply Readjustment

ATC

MR

MC

$60

50

40

D1

S1

An Increase in Demand Temporarily Raises PriceHigher Prices Draw in New CompetitorsIncreased Supply Returns Price to Equilibrium

D2

$60

50

40

S2

Page 35: Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies 21-1 21 Pure Competition

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies21-35

Single Firm Industryp P

p P0 0100 90,00080,000 100,000

Supply Readjustment

ATC

MR

MC

$60

50

40

D3

S3

A Decrease in Demand Temporarily Lowers PriceLower Prices Drive Away Some CompetitorsDecreased Supply Returns Price to Equilibrium

D1

$60

50

40

S1

Page 36: Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies 21-1 21 Pure Competition

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies21-36

P

0 Q

Long-Run Supply CurveConstant-Cost Industry

90,000 100,000 110,000Q3 Q1 Q2

$50

P1

P2

P3

SZ1 Z2Z3

D3 D1 D2

Page 37: Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies 21-1 21 Pure Competition

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies21-37

P

0 Q

Long-Run Supply CurveIncreasing-Cost Industry

90,000 100,000 110,000Q3 Q1 Q2

$50P1

S

Y1

Y2

Y3

D3

D1

D2

$40

$55P2

P3

How Would a Decreasing-Cost Industry Look?

Page 38: Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies 21-1 21 Pure Competition

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies21-38

Pure Competition and Efficiency

• Productive EfficiencyP = Minimum ATC

• Allocative EfficiencyP = MC

• Maximum Consumer and Producer Surplus

• Dynamic Adjustments• “Invisible Hand” Revisited

O 21.1

Page 39: Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies 21-1 21 Pure Competition

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies21-39

Single Firm MarketP

rice

Pri

ce

Quantity Quantity

0 0

Long-Run EquilibriumCompetitive Firm and Market

P MR

D

S

QeQf

ATC

Productive Efficiency: Price = Minimum ATCAllocative Efficiency: Price = MCPure Competition Has Both in

Its Long-Run Equilibrium

MCP=MC=MinimumATC (Normal Profit)

P

Page 40: Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies 21-1 21 Pure Competition

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies21-40

Efficiency Gains From Entry:

• Competitive Model Predicts Lower Price and Greater Output With Increased Efficiency When New Producers Enter Market

• Example is Patented Drugs lose their patent protection

• Patents Enable Greater Profits in Support of R&D and Accelerated Cost Recovery

• After Patent Period Generics Enter Market• Profits Decrease and Quantities Increase• Combined Consumer and Producer

Surpluses Increase

Last

Word

The Case of Generic Drugs

Page 41: Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies 21-1 21 Pure Competition

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies21-41

Pri

ce

Quantity

Efficiency Gains From Entry:Last

Word

The Case of Generic Drugs

P1

P2

D

S

Q1 Q2

f

a

d

cb

• As Price Decreases to f,

• Consumer Surplus abcIncreases to adf

• Producer and ConsumerSurplus is MaximizedTogether as Shown bythe Gray Triangle

Initial Patent Price

Results: Greater Quantity at Lower Pricesas Predicted by the Competitive Model

New Producers Enter Market

Page 42: Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies 21-1 21 Pure Competition

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies21-42

Key Terms• pure competition• pure monopoly• monopolistic com

petition• oligopoly• imperfect

competition• price taker• average revenue• total revenue• marginal revenue• break-even point• MR=MC• short-run supply

curve

• long-run supply curve

• constant-cost industry

• increasing-cost industry

• decreasing-cost industry

• productive efficiency

• allocative efficiency

• consumer surplus• producer surplus