Upload
beatrice-hubbard
View
216
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Copyright © 2008 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited. 10–1
Part 4: Compensating Human Part 4: Compensating Human ResourcesResources
Part 4: Compensating Human Part 4: Compensating Human ResourcesResources
Chapter 10: Compensation Strategies Chapter 10: Compensation Strategies and Practicesand Practices
Prepared by Linda Eligh, University of Western Ontario
Copyright © 2008 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited. 10–2
Learning ObjectivesLearning ObjectivesLearning ObjectivesLearning Objectives
After you have read this chapter, you should be able to:1. Identify the two general types of compensation and
the components of each.2. Discuss four issues associated with strategic
compensation design.3. Describe the various pieces of legislation that impact
on compensation strategies and practices.4. Describe the two means of valuing jobs using job
evaluation and market pricing.5. Outline the process of building a base pay system.6. Explain two ways individual pay increases are
determined.
Copyright © 2008 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited. 10–3
Nature of CompensationNature of CompensationNature of CompensationNature of Compensation
• Types of Rewards Intrinsic
Intangible, psychological, and social effects of compensation
Extrinsic Tangible, monetary, and non-monetary effects of
compensation
• Types of CompensationDirect compensation
The employer exchanges monetary rewards for work done.
Indirect compensation Employer-provided benefits—like health insurance—that are
provide employees for being a member of the organization.
Copyright © 2008 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited. 10–4
Components of a Compensation System Components of a Compensation System Fig. 10-1Fig. 10-1Components of a Compensation System Components of a Compensation System Fig. 10-1Fig. 10-1
Copyright © 2008 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited. 10–5
Typical Division of HR Typical Division of HR Responsibilities: Compensation Responsibilities: Compensation Fig. 10-2Fig. 10-2
Typical Division of HR Typical Division of HR Responsibilities: Compensation Responsibilities: Compensation Fig. 10-2Fig. 10-2
Copyright © 2008 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited. 10–6
Strategic CompensationStrategic CompensationStrategic CompensationStrategic Compensation
• Objectives of a Strategically Supportive Compensation System:
Legal compliance with all appropriate laws and regulations
Cost effectiveness for the organization
Internal, external, and individual equity for employees
Performance enhancement for the organization
Copyright © 2008 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited. 10–7
Compensation PhilosophiesCompensation PhilosophiesCompensation PhilosophiesCompensation Philosophies
• Entitlement PhilosophyAssumes that individuals who have worked another
year are entitled to pay increases, with little regard for performance differences.
• Pay-for-Performance PhilosophyRequires that compensation changes reflect individual
performance differences.
Copyright © 2008 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited. 10–8
Continuum of Compensation Philosophies Continuum of Compensation Philosophies Fig. 10-3Fig. 10-3Continuum of Compensation Philosophies Continuum of Compensation Philosophies Fig. 10-3Fig. 10-3
Copyright © 2008 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited. 10–9
Compensation Approaches Compensation Approaches Fig. 10-4Fig. 10-4Compensation Approaches Compensation Approaches Fig. 10-4Fig. 10-4
Copyright © 2008 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited. 10–10
HR Metrics for Compensation HR Metrics for Compensation Fig. 10-5Fig. 10-5HR Metrics for Compensation HR Metrics for Compensation Fig. 10-5Fig. 10-5
Copyright © 2008 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited. 10–11
Compensation System Design IssuesCompensation System Design IssuesCompensation System Design IssuesCompensation System Design Issues
ExpatriatesExpatriatesExpatriatesExpatriates
Host-Country Host-Country NationalsNationals
Host-Country Host-Country NationalsNationals
Third-Country Third-Country NationalsNationals
Third-Country Third-Country NationalsNationals
Global Global Compensation Compensation
IssuesIssues
Global Global Compensation Compensation
IssuesIssues
Copyright © 2008 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited. 10–12
Typical Components of Expatriate Compensation Typical Components of Expatriate Compensation Fig. 10-6Fig. 10-6Typical Components of Expatriate Compensation Typical Components of Expatriate Compensation Fig. 10-6Fig. 10-6
Copyright © 2008 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited. 10–13
Global Compensation ApproachesGlobal Compensation ApproachesGlobal Compensation ApproachesGlobal Compensation Approaches
• Balance Sheet Approach Compensation plan that equalizes cost differences between
identical international and home-country assignments.
• Global Market Approach Compensation plan that attempts to be more comprehensive in
providing base pay, incentives, benefits, and relocation expenses regardless of the country to which the employee is assigned.
• Tax Equalization Plan Compensation plan used to protect expatriates from negative tax
consequences.
Copyright © 2008 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited. 10–14
Compensation Quartile Strategies Compensation Quartile Strategies Fig. 10-8Fig. 10-8Compensation Quartile Strategies Compensation Quartile Strategies Fig. 10-8Fig. 10-8
Copyright © 2008 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited. 10–15
Market Competitiveness and Compensation Market Competitiveness and Compensation Market Competitiveness and Compensation Market Competitiveness and Compensation
Lead the Lead the MarketMarket
Lead the Lead the MarketMarket Paying for higher qualified, more productive workers.Paying for higher qualified, more productive workers.Paying for higher qualified, more productive workers.Paying for higher qualified, more productive workers.
Meet the Meet the MarketMarket
Meet the Meet the MarketMarket
Attempting to balance employer costs and the need Attempting to balance employer costs and the need to attract and retain employees.to attract and retain employees.
Attempting to balance employer costs and the need Attempting to balance employer costs and the need to attract and retain employees.to attract and retain employees.
Lag the Lag the MarketMarket
Lag the Lag the MarketMarket
Paying all that the firm can afford. Taking advantage Paying all that the firm can afford. Taking advantage of the abundant supply of potential employees in a of the abundant supply of potential employees in a loose labour market.loose labour market.
Paying all that the firm can afford. Taking advantage Paying all that the firm can afford. Taking advantage of the abundant supply of potential employees in a of the abundant supply of potential employees in a loose labour market.loose labour market.
Lead/Lag Lead/Lag the Marketthe Market
Lead/Lag Lead/Lag the Marketthe Market
Lead market salaries for the first half of the year and Lead market salaries for the first half of the year and lag the market for the remaining six months. lag the market for the remaining six months.
Lead market salaries for the first half of the year and Lead market salaries for the first half of the year and lag the market for the remaining six months. lag the market for the remaining six months.
Mix of Mix of StrategiesStrategies
Mix of Mix of StrategiesStrategies
Adopt different strategies for respective employee Adopt different strategies for respective employee groups. groups.
Adopt different strategies for respective employee Adopt different strategies for respective employee groups. groups.
Copyright © 2008 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited. 10–16
Competency-Based PayCompetency-Based PayCompetency-Based PayCompetency-Based Pay
Maintenance ofCompetencies
Maintenance ofCompetencies
Limitations(How many?)
Limitations(How many?)
PricingCompetencies
PricingCompetencies
TrainingTraining
Competency-Competency-Based Pay Based Pay SystemsSystemsKBP/SBPKBP/SBP
Competency-Competency-Based Pay Based Pay SystemsSystemsKBP/SBPKBP/SBP
Copyright © 2008 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited. 10–17
Individual vs. Team RewardsIndividual vs. Team RewardsIndividual vs. Team RewardsIndividual vs. Team Rewards
Distribute variable rewards at the team levelDistribute variable rewards at the team levelDistribute variable rewards at the team levelDistribute variable rewards at the team level
Make system simple and understandable.Make system simple and understandable.Make system simple and understandable.Make system simple and understandable.
Using Team-Based Reward SystemsUsing Team-Based Reward SystemsUsing Team-Based Reward SystemsUsing Team-Based Reward Systems
Use skill-based pay for the base.Use skill-based pay for the base.Use skill-based pay for the base.Use skill-based pay for the base.
Use variable pay based on business entity performanceUse variable pay based on business entity performanceUse variable pay based on business entity performanceUse variable pay based on business entity performance
Maintain a high degree of employee involvementMaintain a high degree of employee involvementMaintain a high degree of employee involvementMaintain a high degree of employee involvement
Copyright © 2008 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited. 10–18
Perceptions of Pay FairnessPerceptions of Pay FairnessPerceptions of Pay FairnessPerceptions of Pay Fairness
EquityEquityEquityEquity
InternalInternalEquityEquity
InternalInternalEquityEquity
ExternalExternalEquityEquity
ExternalExternalEquityEquity
The perceived fairness between what a person does The perceived fairness between what a person does (inputs) and what the person receives (outcomes).(inputs) and what the person receives (outcomes).
The perceived fairness between what a person does The perceived fairness between what a person does (inputs) and what the person receives (outcomes).(inputs) and what the person receives (outcomes).
Employee compensation viewed as equitable in relation to the Employee compensation viewed as equitable in relation to the compensation of employees performing similar jobs in other compensation of employees performing similar jobs in other organizations.organizations.
Employee compensation viewed as equitable in relation to the Employee compensation viewed as equitable in relation to the compensation of employees performing similar jobs in other compensation of employees performing similar jobs in other organizations.organizations.
Employees receive compensation in relation to the knowledge, Employees receive compensation in relation to the knowledge, skills, and abilities they use in their jobs as well as their skills, and abilities they use in their jobs as well as their responsibilities and accomplishments.responsibilities and accomplishments.
Employees receive compensation in relation to the knowledge, Employees receive compensation in relation to the knowledge, skills, and abilities they use in their jobs as well as their skills, and abilities they use in their jobs as well as their responsibilities and accomplishments.responsibilities and accomplishments.
Procedural JusticeProcedural JusticeProcedural JusticeProcedural Justice Perceived fairness of the process and proceduresPerceived fairness of the process and proceduresused to make decisions about employees.used to make decisions about employees.
Perceived fairness of the process and proceduresPerceived fairness of the process and proceduresused to make decisions about employees.used to make decisions about employees.
Distributive JusticeDistributive JusticeDistributive JusticeDistributive Justice Perceived fairness in the distribution of outcomes.Perceived fairness in the distribution of outcomes.Perceived fairness in the distribution of outcomes.Perceived fairness in the distribution of outcomes.
Pay Openness/Pay Openness/SecrecySecrecy
Pay Openness/Pay Openness/SecrecySecrecy
The degree of openness or secrecy that an organization The degree of openness or secrecy that an organization allows regarding its pay system.allows regarding its pay system.
The degree of openness or secrecy that an organization The degree of openness or secrecy that an organization allows regarding its pay system.allows regarding its pay system.
Copyright © 2008 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited. 10–19
Equity Considerations in Compensation Equity Considerations in Compensation Fig. 10-10Fig. 10-10Equity Considerations in Compensation Equity Considerations in Compensation Fig. 10-10Fig. 10-10
Copyright © 2008 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited. 10–20
Employment Standards Acts(ESA)Employment Standards Acts(ESA)Employment Standards Acts(ESA)Employment Standards Acts(ESA)
Provisions of the Act Provisions of the Act Provisions of the Act Provisions of the Act
Minimum wage requirement sets wage floorMinimum wage requirement sets wage floorMinimum wage requirement sets wage floorMinimum wage requirement sets wage floor
Requires overtime payments for “non-exempt” employeesRequires overtime payments for “non-exempt” employeesRequires overtime payments for “non-exempt” employeesRequires overtime payments for “non-exempt” employees
Child labour is prohibitedChild labour is prohibitedChild labour is prohibitedChild labour is prohibited
Establishes hours of workEstablishes hours of workEstablishes hours of workEstablishes hours of work
Regulates definition of “Independent Contractors”Regulates definition of “Independent Contractors”Regulates definition of “Independent Contractors”Regulates definition of “Independent Contractors”
Copyright © 2008 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited. 10–21
Independent Contractor RegulationsIndependent Contractor RegulationsIndependent Contractor RegulationsIndependent Contractor Regulations
• Four Factor Test:Control Test:
Considers how much say an employer has over the individuals’ completion of work.
Integration test Is concerned with how integral the assignment is to normal
running of the business.
Economic Reality Test Looks at the risk of profit or loss to the individual.
Specified Result Test Determines how much control the individual has over
completion of the task.
Copyright © 2008 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited. 10–22
Legislation on Equal Pay and Pay EquityLegislation on Equal Pay and Pay EquityLegislation on Equal Pay and Pay EquityLegislation on Equal Pay and Pay Equity
• Pay Equity Legislation – Enacted in Canada in 1987 to address the historical
wage gap between men and womenGoverned by the Canadian Human Rights Act and the
Equal Wages Guideline
• Three important but different ideas to consider:Equal Pay for Equal WorkEqual Pay for Work of Equal ValuePay Equity Laws
Copyright © 2008 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited. 10–23
Development of a Base Pay SystemDevelopment of a Base Pay SystemDevelopment of a Base Pay SystemDevelopment of a Base Pay System
• Job EvaluationFormal, systematic means to identify the relative
worth of jobs within an organization. Evaluating every job in the organization on:
Skills, Effort, Responsibility and Working Conditions
• Job Evaluation Committees – Committees whose task is to conduct job evaluations
as may be required and/or to determine compensable factors. Most often chaired by key compensation officials from human resources. Membership should be a diverse as possible to ensure widespread input.
Copyright © 2008 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited. 10–24
Compensation Compensation Administration Administration
Process Process Fig. 10-13Fig. 10-13
Compensation Compensation Administration Administration
Process Process Fig. 10-13Fig. 10-13
Copyright © 2008 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited. 10–25
Job EvaluationJob EvaluationJob EvaluationJob Evaluation
FactorFactorComparisonComparison
FactorFactorComparisonComparison
RankingRankingRankingRanking ClassificationClassificationClassificationClassification
PointPointMethodMethod
PointPointMethodMethod
Job Job Evaluation Evaluation MethodsMethods
Job Job Evaluation Evaluation MethodsMethods
Copyright © 2008 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited. 10–26
Paired-Comparison Paired-Comparison Job Ranking Table Job Ranking Table Fig. 10-14Fig. 10-14
Paired-Comparison Paired-Comparison Job Ranking Table Job Ranking Table Fig. 10-14Fig. 10-14
Copyright © 2008 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited. 10–27
Compensable Factor Weights, Points and Degrees Compensable Factor Weights, Points and Degrees Fig. 10-15Fig. 10-15
Compensable Factor Weights, Points and Degrees Compensable Factor Weights, Points and Degrees Fig. 10-15Fig. 10-15
Copyright © 2008 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited. 10–28
Example of Defined Degrees of Subfactor: Example of Defined Degrees of Subfactor: Responsibility for Financial Resources Responsibility for Financial Resources Fig. 10-16Fig. 10-16
Example of Defined Degrees of Subfactor: Example of Defined Degrees of Subfactor: Responsibility for Financial Resources Responsibility for Financial Resources Fig. 10-16Fig. 10-16
Copyright © 2008 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited. 10–29
Valuing Jobs Using Market PricingValuing Jobs Using Market PricingValuing Jobs Using Market PricingValuing Jobs Using Market Pricing
• Market PricingUse of pay survey data to identify the relative value of
jobs based on what other employers pay for similar jobs.
• Advantages of Market PricingTies organizational pay levels to what is actually
occurring in the market, without being distorted by “internal” job evaluation.
Communicates to employees that the compensation system is “market linked,” rather than distorted by internal issues.
Copyright © 2008 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited. 10–30
Valuing Jobs Using Market Pricing (cont’d)Valuing Jobs Using Market Pricing (cont’d)Valuing Jobs Using Market Pricing (cont’d)Valuing Jobs Using Market Pricing (cont’d)
• Disadvantages of Market Pricing It relies on market survey data that is limited or may
have been gathered in methodologically sound ways.
The responsibilities of a specific job in a company may be somewhat different from those of the “matching” job identified in the survey.
The market data’s scope (range of sources) is another concern.
Tying pay levels to market data can lead to wide fluctuations based on market conditions.
Copyright © 2008 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited. 10–31
Pay SurveysPay SurveysPay SurveysPay Surveys
• Pay SurveyCollection of data on compensation rates for workers
performing similar jobs in other organizations.
• Benchmark JobsJobs found in many organizations and performed by
several individuals who have similar duties that are relatively stable and require similar KSAs.
• Internet-Based Pay SurveysPay survey questionnaires are distributed
electronically rather than as printed copies.
Copyright © 2008 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited. 10–32
Using Pay SurveysUsing Pay SurveysUsing Pay SurveysUsing Pay Surveys
MethodologyMethodologyMethodologyMethodology
ParticipantsParticipantsParticipantsParticipants Broad-basedBroad-basedBroad-basedBroad-based
TimelinessTimelinessTimelinessTimelinessSurvey Data Survey Data RelevanceRelevance
Survey Data Survey Data RelevanceRelevanceJob MatchesJob MatchesJob MatchesJob Matches
Copyright © 2008 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited. 10–33
Pay StructuresPay StructuresPay StructuresPay Structures
• Job FamilyA group of jobs having common organizational
characteristics.
• Common Pay StructuresHourly and salariedOffice, plant, technical, professional, managerialClerical, information technology, professional,
supervisory, management, and executive
• Pay GradesGroupings of individual jobs having approximately the
same job worth.
Copyright © 2008 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited. 10–34
Establishing Establishing Pay Structures Pay Structures
Fig. 10-18Fig. 10-18
Establishing Establishing Pay Structures Pay Structures
Fig. 10-18Fig. 10-18
Copyright © 2008 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited. 10–35
Pay Structures (cont’d)Pay Structures (cont’d)Pay Structures (cont’d)Pay Structures (cont’d)
• Market BandingGrouping jobs into pay grades based on similar
market survey amounts.
• Market LineGraph line that shows the relationship between job
value as determined by job evaluation points and job value as determined by pay survey rates.
Shows the distribution of pay for the surveyed jobs, allowing a linear trend line to be developed by the least-squares regression method.
Copyright © 2008 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited. 10–36
Market-Banded Pay Grades for Local Bank Market-Banded Pay Grades for Local Bank Fig. 10-19Fig. 10-19Market-Banded Pay Grades for Local Bank Market-Banded Pay Grades for Local Bank Fig. 10-19Fig. 10-19
*Computed by averaging the pay survey summary data for the jobs in each pay grade.
Copyright © 2008 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited. 10–37
Pay RangesPay RangesPay RangesPay Ranges
• BroadbandingThe practice of using fewer pay grades having
broader pay ranges that in traditional systems.Benefits
Encourages horizontal movement of employees
Is consistent with trend towards flatter organizations
Creates a more flexible organization
Encourages competency development
Emphasizes career development
Copyright © 2008 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited. 10–38
Example of Pay Example of Pay Grades and Pay Grades and Pay Ranges Ranges Fig. 10-20Fig. 10-20
Example of Pay Example of Pay Grades and Pay Grades and Pay Ranges Ranges Fig. 10-20Fig. 10-20
Copyright © 2008 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited. 10–39
Individual PayIndividual PayIndividual PayIndividual Pay
• Rates Out of Range Red-Circled Employees
An incumbent (current jobholder) who is paid above the range set for the job.
Green-Circled Employees An incumbent who is paid below the range set for the job.
• Pay CompressionA situation in which pay differences among individuals
with different levels of experience and performance in the organization becomes small.
Copyright © 2008 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited. 10–40
Determining Pay IncreasesDetermining Pay IncreasesDetermining Pay IncreasesDetermining Pay Increases
• Performance and Merit Increases• Merit Pay
Merit pay programs reward employees with permanent incrses to base pay according to differences in performance.
• Just noticeable difference (JND)The minimum pay increase that employees will see as
making a substantial change in compensation. Sometimes referred to as just-meaningful pay.
Copyright © 2008 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited. 10–41
Pay Adjustment MatrixPay Adjustment MatrixPay Adjustment MatrixPay Adjustment Matrix
• Compa-ratioThe pay level divided by the midpoint of the pay
range.
ratio)-(Compa 110100(midpoint) 15.00
pay)(current $16.50 Employee R
ratio)-(Compa 87 100(midpoint) 15.00
pay)(current $13.05 Employee J
Copyright © 2008 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited. 10–42
Pay Adjustment Matrix Pay Adjustment Matrix Fig. 10-21Fig. 10-21Pay Adjustment Matrix Pay Adjustment Matrix Fig. 10-21Fig. 10-21
Copyright © 2008 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited. 10–43
Determining Pay Increases (cont’d)Determining Pay Increases (cont’d)Determining Pay Increases (cont’d)Determining Pay Increases (cont’d)
• Seniority Time spent in an organization or on a particular job that is used
to determine eligibility for organizational rewards and benefits.
• Cost-of-Living Adjustments (COLA) A percentage increase in wages to maintain real wages in a
period of economic inflation.
Adjustments are tied to changes in an economic measure (e.g., the Consumer Price Index).
• Lump-Sum Increases (LSI) A one-time payment of all or part of a yearly pay increase that
does not increase base wages.