Upload
sinziana-rugina
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/27/2019 Copy of Social Policy Against Poverty
1/13
Social Policy against Poverty. The case of Romania
George Poede
Al I.Cuza University
IASI, ROMANIA
A. Social policy context
New Social Problems
The processes of transformation and transition to the market economy in Central and East
European countries are associated with social problems that had not existed or were not
exacerbated in their communist past. These problems were generated by the economic
recession, restructuring of the economy which eliminated some industrial sectors and a
specific privatization that reduced the number of jobs. The death and morbidity rates
increased dramatically in the area. The impact of unemployment and low-paid work are
major sources of the inequalities in the distribution of incomes. Therefore, there are
multiple risks for the least advantaged generated by the changes in the labor market such
as risk of poverty arising from low income and the risk of exclusion for those affected by
the poor-quality jobs and unemployment. In Central and Eastern Europe, inflation has
eroded the power purchasing of minimum incomes. The most vulnerable groups are the
least qualified, women, minorities (Roma population especially), youth, children, older
people and people with disabilities.
The social problems resulted from a combination of effects of previous inefficient
economies and consequences of current painful restructuring economies to the market
principles. Changes in unemployment and inflation rates are an indicator of the scale of
transition for most of the countries in this area.
Social Care under communism
7/27/2019 Copy of Social Policy Against Poverty
2/13
It is important to show that all the East and Central European countries have had
systems to provide care and offer support for individuals and groups. There were several
components of the social care system: the informal sector of the family, friends and
neighbors which remain the most important source of care and support for those in need;
the voluntary sector; the state sector ( regional and local governments departments and
agencies employing social workers and other group of paid staff) and, on a lesser scale,
the profit sector.
There were some key features of the communist approach to Social Care.
Officially, there was a denial of the existence of problems such as poverty, homelessness,
social exclusion, lack of access to better educational and medical services. Writing about
social care in Communism, Kemecsei states that:
On the basis of socialist ideology, the regime thought that it had no need of a welfare
policy because every action of the socialist state is welfare itself. Therefore they turned a
blind eye to any economic and social problems.1
Another important feature of the communist approach to social care was what
Deacon and others refer to as extreme centrally controlled welfare paternalism of the old
system. The three main sources of social help for those in need were the state, the place of
work, the family. Needs and responses to them were defined by the system and virtually
without taking into consideration the recipients own opinions and preferences. The
typical client was an object and not the self-determined subject. In this perspective,
Martin Potucek refers to the typical communist state which is taking all the functions of
the social policy, including those which in a democratic society are performed by the
family, community or non-state organizations and civil action groups. As a consequence,
the system negatively affected the social support and care by suppressing the social
solidarity with those in need, producing a diminished sense of responsibility for self and
others.2
1Kemecsei, E. The family under the impact of change in Hungary, Social Work in Europe, nr.2, p.32,
1995.
2 Potucek Martin - Current social developments in the Czech and Slovak Republics Journal of European
Social Policy, 3, p. 212, 1993.
2
2
7/27/2019 Copy of Social Policy Against Poverty
3/13
A third characteristic of social care in the former socialist states was the almost
complete outlawing of the non-state organizations. There has been in some countries of
Central and Eastern Europe a quite phenomenal growth in the number of community
associations and not-for-profit social care agencies since 1989 as part of the movement to
develop a social civil society.
The emphasis has been placed on the role of work as a provider of social services.
Large enterprises owned houses, child-care institutions and even hospitals and clinics and
social services were often administered by the enterprise trade union committee.
The difference between social policies and other public policies ( health and
educational policies mainly ) in this part of Europe consists in the difficulty to identify
clear social policy trends as it was not the case with economic ones. The transition to the
market economy and democratization were seen as the most important objectives of these
transformations. On a contrary, the social issues were not given much attention in the
transition strategies. Gotting noticed that social policy transformation turns out to be a
gradual, protracted process, far less incisive than in a transition from plan to market or
from authoritarian rule to the liberal democracy. Post-communist societies do not
suddenly throw overboard those social security systems that they inherited from the old
regime.3
The institutional and financial capacities of social policies and programs were not
able to solve the problems related to the social exclusion and the deteriorated social
cohesion, given the scale of the social needs and problems that the social policy had to
address. Social exclusion, poverty and social vulnerability became usual in vocabulary of
the social scientists. Social exclusion is associatedwith social stigmatization, isolation,
low self-esteem, the feeling of not belonging and not having been given a chance to be
included in the society. Also, this phenomenon is perceived as a generalized disadvantage
experienced by individuals due to different social handicaps. Social exclusion places the
individuals out of normal forms of social life due to lack of means and limited access or
poor participation in several of the most important areas of human activity like education,
labour, family and informal networks, consumption of goods and services,
3Gotting U. Destruction, adjustment and innovation: social policy transformation in Eastern and CentralEurope, Journal of European Social Policy, nr. 4 pp. 181-200, 1994
3
3
7/27/2019 Copy of Social Policy Against Poverty
4/13
communication, community and general public institutions, political life, leisure and
recreation. Social vulnerability is considered as a condition of exposure to risk of social
exclusion due to low income, low education and dependence on public support. It is felt
as dissatisfaction with main domains of activity or living circumstances and awareness
that they cannot afford a number of basic goods, services and activities accessible to the
rest of population. In this perspective, we agree with Bob Deacon (Bob Deacon - The
New Eastern Europe: Social Policy, Past, Present and Future, London, Sage, 1992) which
identifies two key tasks that the social policies have to accomplish in post-communist
societies, namely facilitating an active civil society and implementing an acceptable
concept ofsocial justice.
Table1.
Development of income poverty during the early transition process in selected CEE
countries
Country Poverty headcount index
(% of the population)
Late 1980s
Poverty headcount index
(% of the population)
1993-1994
Czech Republic
Hungary
Poland
Slovakia
Central Europe average
0.0
1.0
6.0
0.0
1.8
1.0
3.0
19.0
1.0
6.0
Bulgaria
Romania
Eastern Europe average
2.0
6.0
3.0
33.0
39.0
34.5
Estonia
Latvia
Lithuania
Baltic States average
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
40.0
25.0
46.0
37.0
Source: UNDP 1998, statistical appendix
4
4
7/27/2019 Copy of Social Policy Against Poverty
5/13
The social policy response
Many authors are observing that people in post-communist countries expect the
new system to improve in comparison with past social provision which was guaranteed,
universal, but often of poor quality and set at low level. Now, social policy has to face
new welfare problems with severely limited resources available for social protection and
social care. Based on political action, the social policy is considered to be the main way
to redistribute the resources generated by the economic activity in connection with the
aim of decreasing the market dependence of the people. The role of the social policy
should be assess in relation with the position played by the state/public, the market or the
networks and the family/civil society when providing social welfare and by the priority
given by social policy model to poverty prevention or income maintenance. In the
German model (Bismarckian) the objective is income maintenance and this one was
adopted by the most of Central and Eastern Europe countries. The prevention of poverty
as the basic objective of social intervention is emphasized in the Beveridge type of social
policy.
The fight against poverty was always an important political objective in the
modern states but the differences are coming from institutional design, policies, programs
and experiences. Under income-maintenance programs there are three approaches that
provide cash-benefits, (a) employment related, (b) universal, and (c) means-tested
systems. Employment related is a merit-based system compensating the loss of income
due to risks such as sickness and old age and are contribution-based social insurance. The
universal and means tested systems are non-contributory and the eligibility for benefits
in these systems is decided through the measurement of individual or family resources
against a standard based on subsistence needs. Means-testing is concerned with providing
resources to the people who will otherwise fall below the minimum standards of living as
it is defined in a specific country. In Central and Eastern Europe there are some studies
made on social assistance schemes named variously social assistance benefits,
minimum income, subsistence benefits, or social aid. The eligibility for benefit is
5
5
7/27/2019 Copy of Social Policy Against Poverty
6/13
established on a basis of an assessment of means, taking into account established
conventions of family obligations and reciprocity4.
The non-contributory means-tested benefits combating poverty reflect the social
history, the economic potential of the Central and East European Countries, the
institutional developments in the Social Policy Strategy. There are general schemes like
Social Assistance benefit to low-income families or life subsistence benefits but also
categorical schemes focused on specific social groups like care allowance, support for
families with children, additional payments for disabled children, invalidity pension,
social pension, personal pension, part-time work assistance, long-term unemployment
assistance, free meals or meals with partial payments, benefits related to education,
heating allowance.
An important question about social policy and welfare developments in former
communist countries is how these developments are to be assessed. Public expectations
are high but the problems to be addressed are immense in this prolonged period of
transition when the government resources are severely reduced.
After reviewing various approaches, Deacon5 lists ten criteria for evaluating the
social policy:
1. Degree of self-activity by the civil society in shaping policy and provision;
2. Relationship between social policy and economic policy;
3. Priority afforded to welfare provision (includes outcome measures);
4. What social group interests are served by the social policy;
5. Agencies of provision (state, market, citizens, family, employer);
6. Forms of control over policy or provision;
7. Relationship of welfare provider and welfare user;
8. Distribution;
9. Implications for the family formation;
10. National basis of the policy.
4 Capucha, L.A. Social Assistance, in Change and Choice in Social Protection. The Experience of Central
and Eastern Europe, (2 vols.), Phare, Consensus II programme, Bruxelles: European Commission, 1999.5 Bob Deacon - The New Eastern Europe : Social Policy Past, Present and Future in Comparative Context,
in Deacon B.,et al.,ed.- The New Eastern Europe: Social Policy, Present, and Future, Sage, London, 1992.
6
6
7/27/2019 Copy of Social Policy Against Poverty
7/13
B. National context
Economic situation
The process of transition to a market economy produced in Romania a lot of changes
connected with a general reduction of the GNP, a sharp decline in industrial
production production, a global rise of prices, currently devaluation, depreciation of
certain services such as health, reduction of social spending, an increase in
unemployment. All these factors affected the quality of life of the majority of the
population and the poverty became the most important concern of the government,
parliament and political parties, civil society, pressure groups.
Table 2
Evolution of different incomes in real terms compared to 1989
Source: Database of the Institute for Quality of Life quoted by Catalin Zamfir Poverty and
Social Exclusion in Romania, HDSE Report on Romania, Council of Europe, 1997.
.
The share of food and beverages in the structure of the consumption expenditure
represents a strong indicator of poverty. In the employed families, food and beverages
consumption represented 60% of the total consumption expenditures in 1994.
Romanians are confronted with new situations as the lack of monetary resources, low
professional skills, a reduced rate of school attendance in primary and secondary,
sharp decrease in the birth rate, high morbidity rate and others. Romania can be
explained by the insufficient attention given to the development of social care
services, the weakening of social ties and human solidarity as a consequence of
growing individualism.
1994 1995 1996
Average real wage 62.1 62.9 77
Minimum real wage 33.4 33.8 35.7
State pension 58.1 64.3 28.6Child allowance 25.0 28.6 28.6
7
7
7/27/2019 Copy of Social Policy Against Poverty
8/13
As a consequence, poverty became a major issue in media and political
institutions. The analysis of the present social context of Romania shows that after
1990 the lack of a coherent system of social services contributed to the deepening of
poverty. The social services tended to develop only as an answer to social crisis
situations. Two major crises persons with handicap and abandoned children-
imposed a rapid institutional development. The social intervention was characterized
by the priority given to the absorption of social consequences of those social crises
than to the correct treatment of multiple causes of the growing number of social
problems. As a result, the financial and institutional actions focused more on
institutions for abandoned children and people with handicap than on families and
communities and the social services were established more at the national and county
level. They were not able to prevent the child abandon, neglecting and abuse, school
abandon, juvenile delinquency and drug consumption or to ensure support for the
families. Professor Catalin Zamfir has established a list with the mechanisms and
factors that produced the explosion of poverty and social exclusion in Romania in
the last ten years:
The economic crisis produced the decrease of wages in value and number; the
real medium wage in 2000 was 60% from its value in 1989;
The polarization of wages; according to the National Institute for Statisticsbetween 0ctober 1997-1999 the wages of about 25% of the employees
represented less than 50% of the medium wage;
The diminishing number of wage labor to 55,7% in 2000 in comparison with
1989; Part of the income based on wage labor has been replaced by social
benefits;
Income uncertainty of those who are self-employed; The majority of self-
employed is working in agricultural sector which is producing low income;
Low value of social benefits: child allowance diminished very much, three
times less than its value in 1989 when it represented 10% from the medium
wage. In 2000, child allowance is only 3, 2% from the medium wage. The
value of the pension is 10% less than the medium wage. The group of retired
people is very large and vulnerable to changes occurred in prices of public
8
8
7/27/2019 Copy of Social Policy Against Poverty
9/13
utilities or food. In October 2001 the rate between wage earner and retired
people was 1:1, 44.
Getting into Agenda
Members of the Parliament, different political parties and the civil society began
to express with different approaches their attitudes toward poverty in the political
system. Beginning with 1992 poverty is a part of the systemic agenda. The most
vulnerable are the families with many children, families affected by the
unemployment, young people leaving the secondary school or the social institutions,
elderly.
The international factors represented by the World Bank, International Monetary
Fund, UNDP played an important role in including the poverty issues in the systemic
agenda and mainly in institutional agenda. They put pressure on Romanian
government to adopt anti-poverty measures in order to get the support of the
population for the economic reforms which, everywhere in Central and Eastern
Europe, produced a lot of harm to communities.
The formulation of the policy proposal
Backed in Parliament by a political coalition, Romanian government introduced in
1995 a project of law whose aim was to ensure the material support for the poor, one
year before the local, general and presidential elections. The project was approved in
the parliamentary commissions of Adunarea Deputatilor and Senate without much
concern for the economic and administrative feasibility. The project received the
consent of the political forces represented in Parliament and was quickly adopted
regardless the budget analysis process needed for such a public policy. As criteria for
the access to monetary aid, the project established a certain level of revenue. There
were no preliminary studies, nor a clear definition of groups living in poverty, no
administrative independent unit to implement the policy, no coordinating structures at
local and at national level or forms of evaluation.
9
9
7/27/2019 Copy of Social Policy Against Poverty
10/13
Fearing a strong negative reaction from voters, not a single political force
formulated fundamental critics to this project of law.
In August 1995, the law was promulgated by the President of Romania.
Policy implementation
In the process of policy implementation, the government decided to use the Social
Offices from the City Halls with poor training in the field of social work and low
professional skills instead of creating a new institution responsible for the
implementation of the newly adopted law. The public servants were supposed only to fill
applications with general information, mainly economic and less to define the target
groups emphasizing on demographic, biological, psychological, social, economic,
cultural and political characteristics, on numerical size of relevant groups projected in
time, on short and long range effects on target and non-target segments of the society.
Soon, the offices were blocked by a large number of people fulfilling the criteria adopted
- a certain level of revenue of the each of the family member.
By the end of the year, the first financial obstacles appeared. The huge numbers of
applicants received the allocations latter than previously set up. It was obviously that the
law was underfinanced and could no longer offer the allocations.
Here is a list of potential causes for the explanation of the failure of Social Aid Law:
1. Absence of the situational analysis prior to the formulation of the Law.
2. The lack of definition of the group entitled to the benefits.
3. An incorrect budgetary process.
4. Lack of skilled personnel able to implement the law.
5. Formulation and adoption of the law only in political institutions without a large
debate of the project among the specialists.
6. An inadequate definition of poverty and of the threshold used.
7. The Law focused exclusively on the monetary services without attention to
counseling, identification of personal causes for the situation of poverty.
8. A simple strategy without combinations on the regional local level in order to identify
10
10
7/27/2019 Copy of Social Policy Against Poverty
11/13
these resources
After one year, the law passed under the authority of local administration which was
declared responsible for the financial means to ensure the law provisions.
The majority of the local administration units suffer from lack of resources due to
the difficult process of taxation. New criteria were set up narrowing, in a large measure,
the number of those entitled to obtain the social aid. In the new context, some groups
were excluded.
The evolution of the aproved requests for social aid
655.178
322.255
168.473
145.473
161.177
176.159
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
Source: Ministry of Labor and Social Solidarity, Report on Social Assistance Activity,Bucharest, 2001
We can assume that the process of implementation had so many financial,
institutional and administrative obstacles that the law became non-operational. The
budgeting process was totally wrong and the law cannot longer fulfill the objectives and
the values supposed to be protected. The Social Aid Law is a typical expression of the
government failure to implement, evaluate and help the beneficiaries as they have been
defined. No report has been published on the Laws implementation and evaluation.
The poverty is even greater now.
Last developments
The failure of the strategy to combat poverty made the entire Romanian society
very sensitive to this problem. The Government, local authorities, academic community
became aware not only of the consequences of this social problem but also of a necessity
11
11
7/27/2019 Copy of Social Policy Against Poverty
12/13
to formulate a coherent long and medium anti-poverty plan. The establishing of Anti-
Poverty Strategies for member and accession EU countries was one of the objectives of
The European Conference in Nice (2000) with four global components for action: overall
access to resources, rights, goods and services, exclusion risk prevention, support for the
most vulnerable individuals and groups, mobilization of all relevant institutions.
These four components were included in the Romanian strategy alongside with
the objectives generated by the specific country transition situation for the next ten years:
Eliminating extreme poverty:
Eliminating the situations of severe social exclusion and the promotion of
social inclusion;
Poverty reduction of economically active persons and retired;
Cohesion and social development promotion;
Decent life conditions for children and their access to development
opportunities;
The new Romanian strategy has also a system of monitoring and evaluation, an
important element that was lacking in the previous institutional approaches to poverty. In
the framework of the new National Anti-Poverty and Social Inclusion Promotion Plan the
adoption of Guaranteed Minimum Income (Law nr. 416 from 18th of July 2001)
represents already an important element of the first objective eliminating the extreme
poverty due to his role in prevention of extreme material deprivation.
Bibliography
1. Catalin Zamfir ( coordinator ) Poverty Situation in Romania, The Research Institute
12
12
7/27/2019 Copy of Social Policy Against Poverty
13/13
for Quality of Life / PNUD Romania, Bucharest, June 2001.
2. Esping_Andersen, GThe Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Oxford, Oxford
University Press, 1990.
3. Przeworski, A. Democracy and the market: political and economic reforms in
Eastern Europe and Latin America, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1991.
4. Deacon, B. (editor) - The New Eastern Europe: Social Policy, Past, Present and Future,
London, Sage, 1992.
5. Staffan Marklund Social Policy and Poverty in Post-Totalitarian Europe, in
Scandinavian Journal of Social Welfare, Vol. 2, Number 3, July 1993.
6. Capucha, L.A. Social Assistance, in Change and Choice in Social Protection. The
Experience of Central and Eastern Europe, (2 vols.), Phare, Consensus II programme,
Bruxelles: European Commission, 1999.
7. Braithwaite, J. Grootaert, C. and Milanovici, B Poverty and Social Assistance in
Transition Economies, New York, St. Martins Press, 1999.
13
13