31
Copernicus services and User Forum Finnish GMES User Forum Helsinki 9.1.2013 Mikko Strahlendorff

Copernicus services and User Forum Finnish GMES User Forum Helsinki 9.1.2013 Mikko Strahlendorff

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Copernicus services and User Forum Finnish GMES User Forum Helsinki 9.1.2013 Mikko Strahlendorff

Copernicus services and User Forum

Finnish GMES User ForumHelsinki 9.1.2013Mikko Strahlendorff

Page 2: Copernicus services and User Forum Finnish GMES User Forum Helsinki 9.1.2013 Mikko Strahlendorff

What is their need?

Oil Spill TrackingFarming Flood

Land Marine Atmosphere Emergency

Policy Makers Public&

USERS

OBSERVATION

Space Infrastructure

In Situ Infrastructure&

Air Quality

Private, Commercial&

Sustainable observation

Surveillance

Security

Arctic change

Examples ofServices Provided

InformationServices

Climate

Overall view

Page 3: Copernicus services and User Forum Finnish GMES User Forum Helsinki 9.1.2013 Mikko Strahlendorff

Services as main goalCore services – EU/public supported

• Provide standardized common (multi-purpose) information for Europe; using economies of scale

• Requested by the EU: link with European information needs

• ‘public good’ data policy: open access and free licensing

Downstream services - Commercial/national• Tailored for specific applications at local, regional,

national levels (public good or private use)

• EU encourages and supports the implementation of these service layer (R&D)

Page 4: Copernicus services and User Forum Finnish GMES User Forum Helsinki 9.1.2013 Mikko Strahlendorff

GMES Services

Horizontal applications

Monitoring of Earth systems

Land

Marine

Atmosphere

Security Emergency Climate Change

Page 5: Copernicus services and User Forum Finnish GMES User Forum Helsinki 9.1.2013 Mikko Strahlendorff

Observational infrastructures

In-situ observation infrastructure: air-, sea- and ground-based systems and instruments

• (e.g. airborne, balloons, floats, ship-borne, measuring stations, seismographs, etc)

Space infrastructure component for GMES: different missions co-ordinated at European level

• Dedicated GMES missions: ESA Sentinels• Contributing missions: EU National, EUMETSAT and third parties

Page 6: Copernicus services and User Forum Finnish GMES User Forum Helsinki 9.1.2013 Mikko Strahlendorff

GMES Space component

• Sentinel 1 – SAR imaging All weather, day/night applications, interferometry; for vessel

detection, oil spills etc. First launch 2013

• Sentinel 2 – Multispectral imaging for land applications, e.g. urban, forest, agriculture, etc. First launch 2013

• Sentinel 3 – Ocean & Land monitoring Wide-swath ocean color, vegetation, sea/land surface

temperature, ocean altimetry First launch 2013

• Sentinel 4 – Geostationary atmospheric Atmospheric composition monitoring, transboundary

pollution First launch 2017 on EUMETSAT MTG-S

• Sentinel 5 – Low-orbit atmospheric Atmospheric composition monitoring Precursor launch 2013, S5 first 2020 on EUM Post-EPS

• JasonCS – Ocean reference altimetry

Page 7: Copernicus services and User Forum Finnish GMES User Forum Helsinki 9.1.2013 Mikko Strahlendorff

User Forum and requirements• GMES should be user driven• How is this working now? User Forum fills the flaw?

• EC runs thematic workshops for each domain• User Forum has 2-3 domains on 1 meetings agenda

Page 8: Copernicus services and User Forum Finnish GMES User Forum Helsinki 9.1.2013 Mikko Strahlendorff

8

Emergency management GIO-EMS in rush mode

• 21 activations in the period April 1, 2012 – now;• 60% of activations, 78% of map products in Europe;• In Europe: 7 forest fires, 2 earthquakes, 3 “other” events;• Activations by AU in HU, IT (2), BG (2), ES (3), SE, PT, RO,

DE, FR; • Outside Europe: primarily floods, triggered by European

AU and ASCU, and WFP, 3 in coordination with Int. Charter “Space and Major Disasters”;

• Close to expected trend for first 8 months.

Page 9: Copernicus services and User Forum Finnish GMES User Forum Helsinki 9.1.2013 Mikko Strahlendorff

EMS Performance parameters• Target for End Users:

• Reference map 6 hours• Delineation and Grading 24 hours

after activation request.• Average timing achieved for products

needing new satellite acquisition:• 3 hours for activation start up• 34 hours for satellite tasking and

acquisition• 8 hours for satellite reception and

validation• 17 hours for delivery of first post-event

product • Average delivery time after activation

request: 2.5 days;• Only few cases meet the End User target,

typically when satellite imagery is in archive, or planned for monitoring extensions.

• Major bottleneck is still the satellite latency

Duration of activation phases

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Tota

l dur

ation

(in

hour

s)

Map production and delivery

Satellite reception and validation

Satellite tasking & acquisition

Request Handling

Page 10: Copernicus services and User Forum Finnish GMES User Forum Helsinki 9.1.2013 Mikko Strahlendorff

GMES land monitoring service: Pan-European Component

- Providing land cover and land cover change information at Pan European scale (CORINE)- Production of 5 thematic high resolution layers- Dissemination + archiving + cataloguing

Follow up of FP 7 GEOLAND – Euroland

Sub-Delegated tasks to the EEA

GMES WP 2011 – 2012 – 2013 / Budget 22 Mi Euro

H. Dufourmont, EEA

Land service

Page 11: Copernicus services and User Forum Finnish GMES User Forum Helsinki 9.1.2013 Mikko Strahlendorff

H. Dufourmont, EEA

Contract type : Framework contract for HRLs production + MS Grants for validation and CLC 2012

Date : November 2011

6 LOTS divided per geographic regions and thematic layers

Contractors : Metria (Se), Geo Ville (Au), VTT (Fi), GAF AG (De), SIRS (Fr), Planetek (It), Planatek (Gr), Indra (Sp), Eurosense (Be), Rapid Eye (De)

Land service

Page 12: Copernicus services and User Forum Finnish GMES User Forum Helsinki 9.1.2013 Mikko Strahlendorff

Implementation of GIO land services Pan EU Component on track except for:

• Work going on regarding the participation of Candidate & potential Candidate Countries.

• Minor delay in production of High Resolution Layers, following the necessity of an additional streamlining phase and the problems with availability of input imagery.

Mitigation measures:

•Major mitigation measures had to be taken in the framework of the ESA GMES DWH•Coordination and flexibility amongst stakeholders is of key importance to keep the planning

H. Dufourmont, EEA

Land service

Page 13: Copernicus services and User Forum Finnish GMES User Forum Helsinki 9.1.2013 Mikko Strahlendorff

GMES land monitoring service: Global Land Component

- Providing Biophysical Parameters (13) on near real time, on a ten-daily frequency and with a world coverage- Quality Control and User feedback analysis- Dissemination + archiving + cataloguing

Follow up of FP 7 GEOLAND – BioparCross-Delegated tasks to the EU DG JRCWP 2012 – 2013 / Budget 4 MEuro

Contractors: VITO (Be), HYGEOS (Fr), Meteo France (Fr), ZAMG (Au), IPMA (Pt), EOLAB (Sp), INRA (Fr), Tu Wien (Au), UCL (Be), Univ. Leicester (Uk), Univ. Lisbon (Pt)

E. Bartholome, DG JRC

LAI VGT

Land service

Page 14: Copernicus services and User Forum Finnish GMES User Forum Helsinki 9.1.2013 Mikko Strahlendorff

GMES regulation:

… air quality, atmospheric chemistry and composition

… essential element for climate change monitoring and the future provision of ECVs …

… on a regular basis and at regional and global levels…

NRT analysis and forecast, reanalysis of past years

•Air Quality for Europe• O3, NO, NO2, CO, SO2, PM10, PM2.5

•Global Atmospheric composition• Greenhouse gases, reactive gases,• aerosol, stratospheric O3

•Climate Forcing• CO2, CH4, monitoring and reanalysis of fluxes

•Solar Energy, UV• Ozone records, ultraviolet radiation

Objective

Atmosphere service

Page 15: Copernicus services and User Forum Finnish GMES User Forum Helsinki 9.1.2013 Mikko Strahlendorff

Outside GIO as FP7 research project MACC-II

•FP7-SPACE-2011: Prototype operational continuity of GMES services in the Atmosphere area

•36 participants from 13 different countries

•27,7 M€ total cost (19 M€ EC contribution)

•From November 2011 to July 2014

•Coordinator: ECMWF (international organization)

www.gmes-atmosphere.eu

Current implementation of pilot service

Atmosphere service

Page 16: Copernicus services and User Forum Finnish GMES User Forum Helsinki 9.1.2013 Mikko Strahlendorff

Event outcome

ENV/EEA Assess feasibility [ETC/ACM]: to use MACC data for concentration maps (population exposure)

ENV/MACC-II Assess feasibility: early delivery of re-analysis based on un-validated data (AQ in-situ)

EEA/MACC-II Information on OGC-compatible service interfaces

MACC-II/national user

Information meeting with AEA for DEFRA (UK)

MS input to User Uptake

Re-analysis of 2011 pollution events

REA/ENTR/projects meeting Air Quality service chain (e.g. MACC-PASODOBLE-obsAIRve)

MACC-II/DWD Clarification of UV radiation service scope

Follow-up

… from GMES User Forum consultation

Atmosphere service

Page 17: Copernicus services and User Forum Finnish GMES User Forum Helsinki 9.1.2013 Mikko Strahlendorff

Global system ECMWF Integrated Forecasting System

(IFS), coupled to global chemical transport model (CTM)

assimilates weather in situ dataand ~50 satellite sources, and compositiondata from ~10 satellite sources

extensive use of in situ composition datafor validation

Regional system Ensemble of seven nationally developed CTMs, European domain driven by data from Global system assimilates in-situ air-quality data and satellite data

Main building blocksAtmosphere service

Page 18: Copernicus services and User Forum Finnish GMES User Forum Helsinki 9.1.2013 Mikko Strahlendorff

Objective:

To provide information on the state of physical ocean and marine ecosystems for the global ocean and the European regional areas.

Monitoring and forecast plus reanalysis of past years on

•Currents

•Temperature

•Salinity

•Sea ice

•Sea level

•Surface winds

•Biogeochemistry

Marine environmental service

Page 19: Copernicus services and User Forum Finnish GMES User Forum Helsinki 9.1.2013 Mikko Strahlendorff

Current implementation of a pilot service

Implementation:

Outside GIO as FP7 research project MyOcean-2

• FP7-SPACE-2011: Prototype Operational Continuity for the GMES Ocean Monitoring and Forecasting Service

• 59 participants from 28 different countries• 41,2 M€ total cost (28 M€ EC contribution)• From April 2012 to September 2014• Coordinator: Mercator Océanhttp://www.myocean.eu.org

Page 20: Copernicus services and User Forum Finnish GMES User Forum Helsinki 9.1.2013 Mikko Strahlendorff

Event outcome

DG MARE consul-tation, June 2012

Green paper on “Marine Knowledge 2020” from seabed mapping to oceanographic forecasting

EEA / DG ENV consultation on MSFD needs

Use and evolution of GMES marine service for Marine strategy framework Directive needs (Good Environmental State – GES)

EuroGOOS / national authorities event, Oct. 2012

Nicosia declaration for the future European Ocean Monitoring Service; enabling economies of scale and avoiding duplication between the European and national levels

MyOcean-2 catalogue

New release of MyOcean-2 catalogue (version 2.2) published

MyOcean-2 Science Days, Nov. 2012

Scientific conference on data, modelling, data assimilation, validation, user requirements and downstream applications

Follow up

… from GMES User Forum consultation

Marine environmental service

Page 21: Copernicus services and User Forum Finnish GMES User Forum Helsinki 9.1.2013 Mikko Strahlendorff

Main building blocks• Thematic Assembly Centres• Marine Forecasting Centres

• Preparing the opera-tional service starting September 2014

• Negotiations on governance model for marine service

Marine environmental service

Page 22: Copernicus services and User Forum Finnish GMES User Forum Helsinki 9.1.2013 Mikko Strahlendorff

EU Regulation (911/2010) specifies that “access to information for climate change monitoring in support of mitigation and adaptation policies” shall be included in the GMES service component.

A Climate Change service must meet the Global Climate Observing System goals:

Monitor the climate system Detect and attribute climate change Assess impacts of, and support adaptation to,

climate variability & change

Climate change service

Page 23: Copernicus services and User Forum Finnish GMES User Forum Helsinki 9.1.2013 Mikko Strahlendorff

consultation process: expert group (2010-2011), ‘Helsinki GMES climate’ conference (Jul 2011), GMES user forum (Nov 2011).

6th FP7 space call (closed since 21 Nov. 2012)

re-analysis (global and EU regional)quality assurance for ECVsclimate indicator toolboxAttribution productsdata access

EC funding: 26 M€

Climate change service

Page 24: Copernicus services and User Forum Finnish GMES User Forum Helsinki 9.1.2013 Mikko Strahlendorff

FP7 work programme 2010

MACC-II (Nov 2011-July 2014)

MyOCEAN-II (April 2012 – September 2014)

GeoLAND-2 (September 2008 – December 2012)

MONARCH-A (March 2010 – February 2013)

CARBONES (April 2010 – March 2013)

EURO4M (April 2010 – March 2014)

ERA-CLIM (January 2011 – December 2013)

FP7 work programme 2011

CORE-CLIMAX (30 months)

CHARMe (24 months)

Climate change building blocks

Page 25: Copernicus services and User Forum Finnish GMES User Forum Helsinki 9.1.2013 Mikko Strahlendorff

from European commission e.g.,FP7 Space call

MS & other customersSelected information

for customer DGs

from other bodies e.g., ESA, Eumetsat, EEA, WMO..

Harmonization/Coordination & QA platform

Climate Indicator Data Store

Customization platform

Sectorial Information System

Ou

treach

pla

tform

Eva

luat

ion

pla

tform

Climate-ADAPT platform

Climate change service

Page 26: Copernicus services and User Forum Finnish GMES User Forum Helsinki 9.1.2013 Mikko Strahlendorff

27

Preparatory Workshop GMES Security – Jun 2012

• To inform Member States on GMES Security Activities and to seek advise on the way ahead

• Framing document distributed prior to the meeting• Series of presentations in 3 sessions (available in CIRCA):

• Border Surveillance• Support to External Action• Maritime Surveillance

• Detailed discussion in the Working-Groups (BS and SEA)• About 55 participants / Debate • Conclusions presented to the User Forum Oct 2012

SECURITY APPLICATIONS

Page 27: Copernicus services and User Forum Finnish GMES User Forum Helsinki 9.1.2013 Mikko Strahlendorff

28

• GMES support to EUROSUR (BS)

GMES BS WG: COM (ENTR, HOME, JRC), Frontex, EUSC, EMSA, EDA, ESA, MS Experts

Concept for EUROSUR, V1.0 of 3.12.2009

Concept of Operations for EUROSUR (CONOPS), V2.3 of 29.6.2011

FP7 call 2012 : LOBOS and SAGRES starting Jan 2013

Main stakeholders: FRONTEX, EMSA, EUSC (with Industry)

• GMES Support to EU External Actions (SEA)

GMES SEA WG: SGC, RELEX, DEVCO, ECHO, ENER, JRC, ESA, EDA, EUSC, MS Experts Since 2011: EEAS

2010: Identification of User Scenarios

2011: Involvement of EEAS (via CMPD)

2012: (late/early 2013) WG recommendations

2013 (Jan): kick-off of 2 FP7 follow-on projects: G-NEXT and G-SEXTANT

2014 (mid): Detailed operational specifications

Security applications

Page 28: Copernicus services and User Forum Finnish GMES User Forum Helsinki 9.1.2013 Mikko Strahlendorff

29

• Maritime Surveillance

• Mapping of Maritime Surveillance Activities:• FP7: FP7 : DOLHIN, NEREIDS, SIMITISYS, PTMAR• ESA: MARISS; • EDA: MARSUR; • EMSA: Operations and R&D• Coordination by Maritime Projects Coordination Board (PCB)

• What else could be done in the area of Maritime Surveillance?• (e.g. anti-piracy/smuggling, fisheries control, monitoring illegal waste dumping)

• Holistic approach needed to improve cost/benefit ratio• Governance issues at stake

• different geometries across Member States• fragmentation of user communities;

• Europe is still working on an integrated Maritime Strategy• Identification of requirements through CISE; • EDA to revitalise• Identification of requirements for the Defence (UK)

Security applications

Page 29: Copernicus services and User Forum Finnish GMES User Forum Helsinki 9.1.2013 Mikko Strahlendorff

30

GMOSAIC

DOLPHIN

NEREIDS

SIMTISYSCall 2011 BRIDGES

SAGRES

LOBOS

G-NEXT

G-SEXTANT

2013 2014 201520122009 2010 2011

Call 2010

Call 2012

2014 2015

Call 2007

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013FP7 GMES SECURITY projects

OPERATIONS

FP7 GMES Security Projects timeline

Page 30: Copernicus services and User Forum Finnish GMES User Forum Helsinki 9.1.2013 Mikko Strahlendorff

31

Possible implementation/coordination

Services Operators Means

Atmosphere ECMWF Delegation agreement

Marine EEA Delegation agreement

Land EEA Delegation agreement

Climate ECMWF Delegation agreement

Security FRONTEX Delegation agreement

Emergency ECHO/JRC Administrative Arrangement

Page 31: Copernicus services and User Forum Finnish GMES User Forum Helsinki 9.1.2013 Mikko Strahlendorff

Next steps on Copernicus

• Decision on the budget (in/out MFF + amount)

• If out MFF, intergovern. agreement

• New Regulation proposed by EC

• Debates + adoption by EP and Council (co-decision)

• Delegation Agreements to be concluded (and procurement)

• Start of the operations

32