“Conveyor Belt Control Using Induction Motor For Industrial Application” (final year project)

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Includes: • Implementation of Three Phase Inverter with 180 degree conduction.• Implementation of Pulse Generation (simple, Sine and Space Vector PWM) and V/f control using STM32F3 series.• Smart Conveyor Belt Implementation and Speed Control of Conveyor Belt via Three Phase Induction Motor.

Citation preview

  • Conveyor Belt Control Using Induction

    Motor For Industrial Application

    Submitted by:

    Maham Naeem 2011-EE-61

    Fatima Muhammad 2011-EE-62

    Warda Gul 2011-EE-68

    Sabooha Saadat 2011-EE-185

    Supervised by: Dr. Syed Abdul Rahman Kashif

    Department of Electrical Engineering

    University of Engineering and Technology Lahore

  • Conveyor Belt Control Using Induction

    Motor For Industrial Application

    Submitted to the faculty of the Electrical Engineering Department

    of the University of Engineering and Technology Lahore

    in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of

    Bachelor of Science

    in

    Electrical Engineering.

    Internal Examiner External Examiner

    DirectorUndergraduate Studies

    Department of Electrical Engineering

    University of Engineering and Technology Lahore

    i

  • Declaration

    We declare that the work contained in this thesis is my own, except where explicitly

    stated otherwise. In addition this work has not been submitted to obtain another degree

    or professional qualification.

    Maham Naeem

    2011-EE-61

    Fatima Muhammad

    2011-EE-62

    Warda Gul

    2011-EE-68

    Sabooha Saadat

    2011-EE-185

    ii

  • Acknowledgments

    In the name of Allah, the most Beneficent and the most Merciful! The successful ac-

    complishment of any task does not solely depend on the efforts of students but also on

    the guideline, encouragement and faith shown by teachers. We extend our gratitude to

    Dr. Syed Abdul Rahman Kashif and all the faculty members who gave us their

    undivided attention and support. Last but not least we would also like to thank our

    parents and God Almighty. Without them we would not have been able to complete

    any of this.

    iii

  • Contents

    Acknowledgments iii

    List of Figures vi

    List of Tables viii

    Abbreviations ix

    Abstract x

    1 Introduction 1

    1.1 Problem Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

    1.1.1 Research Problem Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

    1.1.1.1 Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

    1.2 Estimate Funding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

    1.3 Research and Experimental Period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

    1.3.1 Project Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

    1.4 Remedy for afore mentioned problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

    1.4.1 Why V/F control has been implemented? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

    1.4.2 Why has STM series been used? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

    1.4.3 Conveyor Belt Usage with STM32 F3 series . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

    2 Inverters 5

    2.1 Inverter Output . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

    2.2 Types of Inverter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

    2.2.1 Three Phase Inverter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

    2.2.1.1 180 Degree Conduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

    2.2.1.2 Gating Sequence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

    2.2.1.3 PWM Generation: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

    3 V/F Control 10

    3.1 Scalar Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

    3.2 Vector Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

    3.3 Understanding V/F control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11

    3.3.1 Open Loop Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

    3.4 Control Implementation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

    3.4.1 For Voltage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

    3.4.2 For Frequency . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

    iv

  • Contents v

    4 Hardware Implementation 16

    4.1 Power Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16

    4.2 Inverter Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17

    4.2.1 Optocouplers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18

    4.2.2 Gate Driver Circuit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18

    4.2.3 Three Phase Inverter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19

    4.3 Induction motor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20

    4.4 Conveyor Belt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20

    5 Simulation and Hardware Results 23

    6 Conclusion and Recommendations for Further Work 26

    6.1 Accomplished Objective . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26

    6.2 Application . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26

    6.3 Recommendations for Further Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27

    6.3.1 Current Sensing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27

    6.3.2 Voltage Sensing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27

    6.3.3 Object Detection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27

    6.3.4 Speed Measurement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28

    6.3.5 Implementation of Closed Loop Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28

    References 29

  • List of Figures

    1.1 Project Management[6] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

    2.1 Voltage Fed Inverter[5] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

    2.2 Line to neutral voltage waveform for phase a[5] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

    2.3 Line to neutral voltage waveform for phase b[5] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

    2.4 Line to neutral voltage waveform for phase c[5] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

    2.5 Line to line voltage waveform for all phases[5] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

    2.6 Code showing Channel 1 (Reference Pulse) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

    2.7 Code showing 120 delay . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

    2.8 120 delay . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9

    2.9 Code showing 240 delay . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9

    2.10 240 delay . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9

    3.1 Torque Speed Characteristic Curve[2] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11

    3.2 Voltage Frequency Curve[7] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

    3.3 Multiplied reference pulse . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

    3.4 Multiplied 120 delayed pulse . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

    3.5 Multiplied 240 delayed pulse . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

    3.6 With Maximum Duty Cycle Of 4 KHZ Pulse . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

    3.7 With Minimum Duty Cycle Of 4 KHZ Pulse . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

    3.8 Variable Frequency . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

    3.9 Variable Frequency . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

    3.10 Graph Between Voltage and Frequency . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15

    4.1 Project Setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16

    4.2 AC source . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16

    4.3 Bridge Rectifier And Capacitor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17

    4.4 Complete Power Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17

    4.5 Inverter Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18

    4.6 Optocoupler[4] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18

    4.7 Gate Driver[1] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19

    4.8 Connection Diagram[1] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19

    4.9 Gate Driver Circuit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20

    4.10 Pin Configuration of IRF450[3] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20

    4.11 inverter pcb . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21

    4.12 Induction Motor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21

    4.13 Conveyor Belt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22

    5.1 Simulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23

    vi

  • List of Figures vii

    5.2 Line to neutral Voltage Waveform(Simulation) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24

    5.3 Line to neutral Voltage Waveform . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24

    5.4 Line to Line Voltage Waveform . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25

  • List of Tables

    3.1 Voltage and Frequency . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15

    4.1 Motor Specifications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20

    viii

  • Abbreviations

    PWM Pulse Width Modulation

    MOSFETS Metal Oxide Semiconsuctor Field Effect Transisitor

    ix

  • Abstract

    Experimentation and implementation, is the essence of learning in the field of engineering

    that is highlighted by the final year project. The economic growth of a country depends

    on a flourishing industry and betterment in its work certainly gives a boost to the

    previously normal outcome. Speed control of induction motors is a major concern of

    todays industry, and while different techniques are being employed for it; in this project

    v/f control has been utilized. The control is executed using the STM32F3. Usage of

    STM32F3 controller for such applications has not yet been dealt with at this level,

    which is why our study becomes important and more elaborate. The gating sequences

    for inverter switches have been tested with simple PWM pulses with varying duty cycles.

    The chapters coming forth give a detailed explanation on the working of three phase

    inverters, V/F control, induction motors and the conveyor belt control. Amongst the

    last chapters we show the underlying software and hardware work, with their results.

    Where the actual concern is implementation of speed control to conveyor belts; that are

    widely used in industry, speed control may be applied for several other functions too.

  • Chapter 1

    Introduction

    1.1 Problem Statement

    Controlling speed of induction motors has always been a major concern for the industry.

    With the coming years, improvement in this control is a necessity.

    1.1.1 Research Problem Statement

    The purpose of this project is to control speed of three phase induction motors making

    it simpler and easier by employing the V/F technique. Industrial processes require some

    defined speed ranges of induction motors for accomplishments of various tasks. This

    control has been tested and implemented using the STM32F3203VC controller. STM

    series provide a much efficient and quicker on/off control for the inverter operation,

    which in turns caters for a smoother operation of motor.

    1.1.1.1 Objectives

    Speed of control of conveyor belt via three phase induction motor

    Implementation of v/f control and pulse generation by STM32F3 series

    Smart conveyor belt implementation

    1.2 Estimate Funding

    STM32 F3 microcontroller= 1800(PKR)

    PCB (Three)= 8800(PKR)

    Isolated transformers = 700(PKR)

    Bridge rectifiers = 150(PKR)

    Driver IC (IR2103) = 700(PKR)

    Opto-couplers = 700(PKR)

    1

  • Chapter 1. Introduction 2

    MOSFETS (IFR450) = 1000(PKR)

    Fuses (2 Amperes) = 100(PKR)

    Induction motor = 3500 (PKR)

    Conveyor belt = 6000(PKR)

    Display setups = 6000(PKR)

    Others = 7000(PKR)

    Total (approximated) = 38000(PKR)

    1.3 Research and Experimental Period

    Step 1: The idea was first proposed in the 6th semester. We focused on the currentindustrial needs and understood the importance of speed control and workings for

    induction motors. (1-2 months)

    Step 2: The next important task was to understand the implementation and work-ing of all components and features of the project, for instance studying; three phase

    inverters, induction motors, techniques to control the speed and conveyor belt de-

    sign. (3-4 months)

    Step 3: STM32 F3 controller features; their usage and efficient implementation.(3-4 months)

    Step 4: A full fledge working model/ PCB of three phase inverter. (2-3 months)

    Step 5: Induction motor interfacing with the three phase inverter and its speedcontrol using the v/f technique (1-2 months)

    Step 6: Design and implementation of conveyor belt. Controlling the belt withthe induction motor fixed on the side of the structure. (2 months)

    1.3.1 Project Management

    The concept of project management is essential for the successful completion of the target

    set. The infrastructure of the whole project must be laid down and every big step must

    be broken down to small ones. It is by the iterative development and accomplishment of

    small tasks for a bigger and better impact on the overall outcome. The following figure

    explains this concept.

  • Chapter 1. Introduction 3

    Figure 1.1: Project Management[6]

    1.4 Remedy for afore mentioned problems

    1.4.1 Why V/F control has been implemented?

    V/f control has many advantages over other speed control techniques the highlight of it

    being easier and cheaper to implement. Industries require simpler and easy to imple-

    ment methods for control that gives satisfactory performance too. V/f covers all these

    aspects. Not only this, it also gives wider stable operating region, low starting currents

    to begin with and better transient and steady state performances too. Understanding

    its significance, made working on it even more important.

    1.4.2 Why has STM series been used?

    Usage of STM series for the purpose of speed control is not yet a widely used concept.

    The STM series provides a much more efficient and reliable operation for the generation

    of different PWM techniques and interfacing, enhancing control over the control belt

    and setting a more stable functionality for the working of three phase inverters. Their

    study and implementation for speed control in industry will prove to be a hallmark.

    1.4.3 Conveyor Belt Usage with STM32 F3 series

    Conveyor belts are chiefly meant for the purpose of conveying or carrying/transporting

    objects from one place to another. The belts act as a medium of transportation, residing

    on two or more pulleys for accomplishing its purpose. The pulleys are named as the

    powered and empowered pulleys also known as drive pulleys and idler pulley respectively.

    Industrial applications vary widely, and so does the conveyor belt type. It maybe used

  • Chapter 1. Introduction 4

    either for simple transporting boxes within store rooms of a factory or even handling

    bulk material movement (longer conveyor belts are used for this purpose). In our project

    the conveyor belt is driven with the help of two pulleys, where the drive is provided by

    the induction motor which is in turn controlled by the inverter.

  • Chapter 2

    Inverters

    The conversion of dc input to required magnitude and frequency of ac output is called

    inversion. Inverters are solid state devices that can be given dc input in the form of

    current or voltage; to be converted to respective ac output. Based on inputs; there are

    different type of inverters namely voltage fed inverters, current fed-inverters, resonant

    pulse inverters etc. The type of inverter widely used in the industry is the voltage

    fed inverter, which has been implemented in the project for conveyor belt control. In

    this type, the dc voltage being fed is kept constant, while output depends on the gating

    sequence of the switches used. Output current is dependent on the value of load.

    Figure 2.1: Voltage Fed Inverter[5]

    2.1 Inverter Output

    Output voltage of Inverter can be changed by two methods

    1. Keeping the dc input voltage constant; while varying the gain of the inverter that

    employs the technique of pulse width modulation for its gating sequence.

    2. Keeping the gain of the inverter constant, varying the input dc voltage of the

    inverter.

    5

  • Chapter 2. Inverters 6

    2.2 Types of Inverter

    1. Single Phase Inverter

    2. Three Phase Inverter

    2.2.1 Three Phase Inverter

    Three phase inverters can be made by either using three single phase inverters together,

    that is, the whole inverter shall have twelve switching devices. But the exceeding number

    of components and their control not only reduces efficiency but also makes it a tedious

    task. We can in turn use the configuration shown below, which employs only six switches

    fulfilling the same task. 3-phase inverters are frequently used for high-power applications.

    They are also used for supplying 3-phase load particularly in AC motor drives. These

    inverters can be operated in different modes such as 60 degree conduction, 120 degree

    conduction and 180 degree conduction. We shall describe 180 degree conduction further

    on.

    2.2.1.1 180 Degree Conduction

    Three phase inverter consists of six MOSFETs and six diodes. The diodes are parallel

    to the switches and prevent the opposite flow of current. The three phase inverter

    employs six MOSFETs as the switching devices. The on off control of these MOSFETs

    via gate pulses determines the output voltage waveform. The switching control decides

    how long one switch remains on or conducts. In 180 degree conduction every MOSFET

    conducts for 180 degrees, or the gate pulse applied keeps the MOSFET in ON state for

    180 degrees. At any given time only three of them remain ON while the rest are off.

    Two switches of the same phase are never turned on simultaneously otherwise the DC

    input provided would be short circuited.

    2.2.1.2 Gating Sequence

    Three PWM pulses generated from the micro-controller were applied to the opto-couplers

    (they help in providing the electrical isolation and save the microcontroller from damage

    in case a fault occurs) which in turn were fed to the gate drivers. The pulses applied

    were 120 degrees out of phase with one another, which the gate drivers (IR2103) then

    change to six pulses that is, the original pulses with their complements or 180 degree

    shifted pulses.

  • Chapter 2. Inverters 7

    Line to neutral and line to line voltages are shown below

    Figure 2.2: Line to neutral voltage waveform for phase a[5]

    Figure 2.3: Line to neutral voltage waveform for phase b[5]

    Figure 2.4: Line to neutral voltage waveform for phase c[5]

  • Chapter 2. Inverters 8

    Figure 2.5: Line to line voltage waveform for all phases[5]

    2.2.1.3 PWM Generation:

    Three pulses are generated with 120 and 240 degree delays with respect to the first pulse.

    The inverted pulses are generated by the gate driver IC (IR2103).

    Figure 2.6: Code showing Channel 1 (Reference Pulse)

    The pulse with 120 delay is shown in figure below:

    Figure 2.7: Code showing 120 delay

    The pulse with 240 delay is shown in figure below:

  • Chapter 2. Inverters 9

    Figure 2.8: 120 delay

    Figure 2.9: Code showing 240 delay

    Figure 2.10: 240 delay

  • Chapter 3

    V/F Control

    Induction motor controls are of two types

    Scalar Control

    Vector Control

    3.1 Scalar Control

    Scalar Control is an easily implemented control, in which only the magnitude and phase

    of the variable quantities or parameters are to be set. For instance, in case of induction

    motors we may control the parameter of flux via voltage or frequency to control the

    torque. Even though these parameters affect each other too, that is, voltage by frequency

    and torque by flux, we neglect it. This control is not as fast as or efficient as vector

    control its simple and economical factors which make its use widespread.

    3.2 Vector Control

    Vector control is although a more complicated approach, but it is still a more precise and

    faster control. What happens in this case is that each of the stator current, in the three

    phases of motor, parameter is broken down or decoupled into two vectors; one vector

    that controls magnetic flux and the other which is responsible for torque and then each

    of this vector parameter is controlled separately.

    Speed Control of Motors can be done by different methods such as follows:

    Varying parameters of stator such as

    1. Voltage

    2. Current

    3. Frequency

    V/f Control

    10

  • Chapter 3. V/F Control 11

    Slip Control

    Changing Poles

    Varying rotor resistance

    Vector Control

    Amongst these controls V/f control is the most commonly used control. This is because

    not only it is easier to implement, it also gives a good speed range for which an induction

    motor can work.

    3.3 Understanding V/F control

    In case of V/f control our major concern is, as the name indicates, keeping the ratio

    a constant. Why that is necessary, is explained as follows: Stator voltage is directly

    proportional to both supply frequency and the flux in the air gap. It can be given by

    the following equation:

    If we ignore the resistance of the stator, the same could be considered for the voltage that

    appears at its terminals. If the voltage is kept constant while decreasing frequency the

    air gap flux would increase. This increase is unwanted and is the reason for iron losses

    and decrease in the motor efficiency, which is why whenever the frequency is changed,

    so is the voltage so that the ratio and in turn the flux remains a constant. With this

    approach maximum torque of the induction machine remains a constant for different

    speed ranges. This can be viewed through the following graph.

    Figure 3.1: Torque Speed Characteristic Curve[2]

    Another graph that follows can help better in the understanding of this concept: The

    v/f control graph can be divided into three portions.

  • Chapter 3. V/F Control 12

    Figure 3.2: Voltage Frequency Curve[7]

    When the induction machine just starts the voltage is not zero but the frequency is,

    so the voltage is kept at such a value that, there is a certain drop across the stator

    resistance. The value of voltage is increased gradually up to cut off frequency for a

    linear relation to establish between the two parameters. From cut off frequency to rated

    frequency both the parameters increase at the same rate (within the maximum limits

    of the machine), keeping the flux value constant and in turn the torque that would be

    independent in such a way.

    After the rated value of voltage of the machine is achieved increasing frequency any

    further would only cause a disturbance in the ratio maintained and the flux would

    decrease. Increasing voltage will damage the insulation of the stator windings and

    therefore it is preferred to remain within the linear region.

    3.3.1 Open Loop Control

    The V/f control used here in the project is an open loop control, which is why even if

    the output speed is a little varied from the theoretically calculated, it would not affect

    the overall outcome as such. Feedback or closed loop control is needed for places where

    high accuracy is required.

    3.4 Control Implementation

    3.4.1 For Voltage

    Step 1: In order to vary the output voltage we generated 4KHZ PWM pulse.

    Step 2: 4 KHz PWM pulse is multiplied with the reference pulse, of 50 Hz fre-quency.

    Step 3: 4 KHz PWM pulse is multiplied with the 120 delayed pulse, of 50 Hzfrequency.

    Step 4: 4 KHz PWM pulse is multiplied with the 240 delayed pulse, of 50 Hzfrequency.

  • Chapter 3. V/F Control 13

    Figure 3.3: Multiplied reference pulse

    Figure 3.4: Multiplied 120 delayed pulse

    Figure 3.5: Multiplied 240 delayed pulse

    Step 5:The duty cycle of the 4 KHz PWM pulse is varied to change the outputvoltage. The duty cycle is changed by a variable resistor, which is fed to ADC of

    the microcontroller.

    Figure 3.6: With Maximum Duty Cycle Of 4 KHZ Pulse

  • Chapter 3. V/F Control 14

    Figure 3.7: With Minimum Duty Cycle Of 4 KHZ Pulse

    3.4.2 For Frequency

    Voltage is changed by a variable resistor and correspondingly frequency is calculated so

    that flux of the motor remains constant.

    Figure 3.8: Variable Frequency

    Figure 3.9: Variable Frequency

  • Chapter 3. V/F Control 15

    Proceeding step by step, we first derive a relation between output voltage and voltage

    across the variable resistor.

    Vo = K*Va

    where Vo = output voltage

    Va = Voltage across variable resistor

    and K is the constant of proportionality.

    Kf = Vo/F-rated =220/50= 4.4

    And Kf =Vo/f =K*Va /f

    f = (K*Va)/4.4

    We calculated the value of K by hit and trial so that the ratio output voltage and fre-

    quency comes out to be constant, K= 20

    The graph is obtained from the following readings

    Frequency Voltage

    50 73

    45 66

    40 58

    35 51

    30 40

    Table 3.1: Voltage and Frequency

    The graph between frequency and voltage shows that the ratio remains constant.

    Figure 3.10: Graph Between Voltage and Frequency

  • Chapter 4

    Hardware Implementation

    The entire project set up is shown in the figure below. Each of its part is explained as

    follows:

    Figure 4.1: Project Setup

    4.1 Power Module

    The power module consists of a 220V AC source, which is rectified by a three phase

    bridge rectifier; the pulsating DC is then smoothed out by a capacitor and fed as an

    input DC source to the inverter. The complete power module is shown in Figure 4.4

    Figure 4.2: AC source

    16

  • Chapter 4. Hardware Implementation 17

    Figure 4.3: Bridge Rectifier And Capacitor

    Figure 4.4: Complete Power Module

    4.2 Inverter Module

    The three phase inverter is made of several different components working in a well

    defined sequence. The pulses generated by the microcontroller can not be directly fed

    into the MOSFETs. This is because the pulses generated have a very small magnitude

    of voltage which is not sufficient to switch ON these devices. Also the microcontroller

    needs to be protected in case of short-circuiting or any other fault that occurs in the

    circuit. The components described below are in the sequence of usage in this module.

  • Chapter 4. Hardware Implementation 18

    Figure 4.5: Inverter Module

    4.2.1 Optocouplers

    The pulses are fed to optocouplers instead. The ones used here are TLP250. These

    provide electrical isolation to the microcontroller. We have used six of them. The pin

    configuration of the isolator has been shown.

    Figure 4.6: Optocoupler[4]

    4.2.2 Gate Driver Circuit

    The isolators send the signal to gate drivers IR2103. These are responsible for not only

    inversion of the three pulses being fed but also add a dead band of about 520 nanoseconds

    in them. This helps greatly as the pulses of two MOSFETs in the same phase, while

  • Chapter 4. Hardware Implementation 19

    switching do not overlap and create a short circuit. These signals, that is, inverted and

    no inverted pulses are fed to the MOSFETs. The connections, pin configuration and

    description of the IC are given below:

    Figure 4.7: Gate Driver[1]

    HIN: Logic input for high side gate driver output(HO), in phase LIN: Logic input for

    low side gate driver output (LO), out of phase VB: High side floating supply HO: High

    side gate drive output Vs: High side floating supply return Vcc: Low side and logic fixed

    supply LO: Low side gate drive output COM: Low side return

    Figure 4.8: Connection Diagram[1]

    At pins HIN and LIN we give the non-inverted pulses generated by microcontroller via

    optocoupler. From pins HO and LO we receive the inverted and non-inverted output

    ready to be given to the power MOSFETs. Three of them were used to cater for the six

    power MOSFETs utilized.

    4.2.3 Three Phase Inverter

    Six power MOSFETs, IRF450, have been used to implement the three phase inverter

    configuration. Each phase consists of two ICs, with complementing pulses.

    These power MOSFETs have a large voltage rating approximately 500 V and a maximum

    current rating of 14 Amperes, which allows us to vary DC input voltage for a wider range

    The PCB of the module is shown in the figure below:

    The fuses at the end of the three phases are to save the motor from burning due to short

    circuiting or overcurrent.

  • Chapter 4. Hardware Implementation 20

    Figure 4.9: Gate Driver Circuit

    Figure 4.10: Pin Configuration of IRF450[3]

    4.3 Induction motor

    The inverter output is used to drive the three phase induction motor. The motor is

    connected to the inverter, as the motor is driven the conveyor belt attached to it moves

    as well. The motor specifications are given in table.

    Phase 3

    Frequency 50Hz

    Voltage 220V

    Current 2A

    Power 10W

    rpm 1450

    Table 4.1: Motor Specifications

    4.4 Conveyor Belt

    The conveyor belt designed has a length of about 3 feet and width of 4.7 inches. The

    entire structure is made of aluminum and supported on a wooden sheet by two aluminum

    cases. The pulleys and bearings were designed in accordance to the conveyor size. There

    are two pulleys, one controlled by the motor and the other is the idler that moves by

  • Chapter 4. Hardware Implementation 21

    Figure 4.11: inverter pcb

    Figure 4.12: Induction Motor

    the movement of belt. The belt itself is made of flex sheet of about 80 inches in size and

    3.5 inches width that is wrapped around the structure uniformly

  • Chapter 4. Hardware Implementation 22

    Figure 4.13: Conveyor Belt

  • Chapter 5

    Simulation and Hardware Results

    Prior to hardware implementation we simulated the three phase inverter onto Proteus

    8.0. The circuit simulation is as follows:

    Figure 5.1: Simulation

    In the circuit shown above: Pulses marked one, two and three show the input to the

    upper three MOSFETs marked Q1, Q2 and Q3. Also a dc input of twenty volts has

    been given to their collectors that are common. Even though IRF230 is used as power

    MOSFET, when actually implemented we employed IRF450 to cater for higher values

    of voltage and current. The three pulses are shifted at 120 degrees from one another,

    inverted by NOT gate and given to the lower three MOSFETs marked Q4, Q5 and Q6.

    In such a way each phase has two MOSFETs, one driven by non-inverted input and the

    other by the inverted pulse. No two MOSFETs of the same phase are ON at a certain

    time otherwise it short circuits the dc input voltage, which is undesirable. The three

    phases A, B and C have been given to a resistive load at the end and output waveform

    is seen by the oscilloscope which is as follows:

    23

  • Chapter 5. Simulation and Hardware Results 24

    Figure 5.2: Line to neutral Voltage Waveform(Simulation)

    The hardware results in comparison to these were as follows

    Figure 5.3: Line to neutral Voltage Waveform

  • Chapter 5. Simulation and Hardware Results 25

    Figure 5.4: Line to Line Voltage Waveform

  • Chapter 6

    Conclusion and

    Recommendations for Further

    Work

    6.1 Accomplished Objective

    The major objective this project was to control speed of a conveyor belt using an in-

    duction motor. This goal was successfully met by implementation of this control using

    the STM series, that is, STM32F1 and STM32F3 controller. The pulses generated were

    through the microcontroller, 120 degrees displaced from each other, and then comple-

    mented. The six pulses, three inverted and three non-inverted were achieved by the gate

    drivers used IR2103. These were utilized, to drive the six MOSFET configuration of the

    three phase inverter. By controlling the duty cycle of these pulses, that is the originally

    generated 50 Hz frequency pulses multiplied with 4 KHz PWM, consequently giving a 50

    Hz pulses with varying duty cycle. This variation was controlled by a variable resistor.

    The output of inverter was fed to induction motor. This drove the conveyor belt and

    varied its speed as desired. This was the successful implementation of V/f control; an

    easy, simple and economical technique which gives a wider range of speed too.

    6.2 Application

    Conveyor belt control has multiple applications. Industrial processes such as moving

    around goods, collection, packaging etc. all involve controlling the speed of conveyor

    belts for the overall smooth functioning of manufacturing or supplying a final product.

    Conveyor belts are also used for

    Security purposes in airports.

    A good example in case of health and fitness is the usage of the belt in treadmills

    Washing machines26

  • Chapter 6. Conclusion and Recommendations for Further Work 27

    Smaller cranes

    Robot Arm of Injection Machine (clamp)

    Elevator

    Grinding Machine

    Drilling Machine

    Wood Machine

    Webbing Loom

    Air Conditioner for Large Buildings

    Water Supply System for Large Buildings

    Collection and separation of solid wastes. For instance, the speed of conveyor beltcould be slowed down so that glass maybe be picked out carefully by manual labor.

    An innovative usage of conveyor belts is in the restaurant business. The idea is simple.

    Food is placed onto conveyor belts that move around the entire service lounge. Speed

    can be controlled manually and orders are placed accordingly. Customers can self-pick

    what they ordered for as it approaches towards them on the belt.

    6.3 Recommendations for Further Work

    With the limited time span allotted for a final year project, there are many areas which

    could always be improved or worked more thoroughly on. A few recommendations for

    further work are as follows

    6.3.1 Current Sensing

    As the load on the conveyor belt varies, the current drawn also varies and so does the

    speed of the belt. Work can be done in order to sense and measure the value of current

    and change the conveyor belt control parameters accordingly.

    6.3.2 Voltage Sensing

    Value of output voltage can be sensed by using potential divider rule and then displaying

    it on the LCD. The implementation would include configuring ADC (Analog to Digital

    Converter) in the STM microcontroller.

    6.3.3 Object Detection

    Another possibility could be the detection of objects placed on conveyor belt such that

    the belt moves only when an object is placed onto it and when it reaches the required

    destination the belt stops automatically.

  • Chapter 6. Conclusion and Recommendations for Further Work 28

    6.3.4 Speed Measurement

    Induction motor speed varies according to the load on it. The same holds true for the

    load onto conveyor belt. What can be done is different speed ranges can be set and

    defined for the maximum and minimum amount of load that can be put with respect to

    the DC input voltage applied.

    6.3.5 Implementation of Closed Loop Control

    Speed may not increase or decrease according to the theoretical calculations which is why

    a feedback or closed loop control would be more suitable in case of some applications.

    A reference speed can be set and others can be measured and corrected to its respect.

  • References

    [1] http://pdf1.alldatasheet.com/datasheet-pdf/view/84682/IRF/IR2103.html.

    [2] http://ethesis.nitrkl.ac.in/5016/1/109EE0039.pdf.

    [3] http://www.jameco.com/Jameco/Products/ProdDS/670135-DS01.pdf.

    [4] http://pdf1.alldatasheet.com/datasheet-pdf/view/32418/TOSHIBA/TLP250.

    html.

    [5] books.google.com.pk/books/about/Power_Electronics.html?id=

    -WqvjxMXClAC&redir_esc=y.

    [6] http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/PmHome.

    [7] http://www.ti.com/lit/an/sprabq8/sprabq8.pdf.

    29

    AcknowledgmentsList of FiguresList of TablesAbbreviationsAbstract1 Introduction1.1 Problem Statement1.1.1 Research Problem Statement1.1.1.1 Objectives

    1.2 Estimate Funding1.3 Research and Experimental Period1.3.1 Project Management

    1.4 Remedy for afore mentioned problems1.4.1 Why V/F control has been implemented?1.4.2 Why has STM series been used?1.4.3 Conveyor Belt Usage with STM32 F3 series

    2 Inverters2.1 Inverter Output2.2 Types of Inverter2.2.1 Three Phase Inverter2.2.1.1 180 Degree Conduction2.2.1.2 Gating Sequence2.2.1.3 PWM Generation:

    3 V/F Control3.1 Scalar Control3.2 Vector Control3.3 Understanding V/F control3.3.1 Open Loop Control

    3.4 Control Implementation3.4.1 For Voltage3.4.2 For Frequency

    4 Hardware Implementation4.1 Power Module4.2 Inverter Module4.2.1 Optocouplers4.2.2 Gate Driver Circuit4.2.3 Three Phase Inverter

    4.3 Induction motor4.4 Conveyor Belt

    5 Simulation and Hardware Results6 Conclusion and Recommendations for Further Work 6.1 Accomplished Objective6.2 Application6.3 Recommendations for Further Work6.3.1 Current Sensing6.3.2 Voltage Sensing6.3.3 Object Detection6.3.4 Speed Measurement6.3.5 Implementation of Closed Loop Control

    References