Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Control Theory:Feedback and the Pole-Shifting Theorem
Joseph Downs
September 3, 2013
Introduction (+ examples)What is Control Theory?Examples
State-SpaceWhat is a State?Notation
(State) FeedbackFeedback Mechanisms
LTI SystemsLinearity and StationarityHow to Apply the PST
The Pole-Shifting TheoremStatement of the Pole-Shifting TheoremConsequences of the Pole-Shifting Theorem
Conclusion
What is Control Theory?
I steer physical quantities to desired values
I mathematical description of engineering process
I application of dynamical systems theory
I introduce a control, u
What is Control Theory?
I steer physical quantities to desired values
I mathematical description of engineering process
I application of dynamical systems theory
I introduce a control, u
What is Control Theory?
I steer physical quantities to desired values
I mathematical description of engineering process
I application of dynamical systems theory
I introduce a control, u
What is Control Theory?
I steer physical quantities to desired values
I mathematical description of engineering process
I application of dynamical systems theory
I introduce a control, u
Examples
I cruise control
I precision amplification (lasers + circuits)
I biological motor control systems
Examples
I cruise control
I precision amplification (lasers + circuits)
I biological motor control systems
Examples
I cruise control
I precision amplification (lasers + circuits)
I biological motor control systems
The Handstand Problem: Setup
I Iα =∑τi
I mL2θ = mgL sin θ − u
I θ = g sin θL − u
mL2
The Handstand Problem: Setup
I Iα =∑τi
I mL2θ = mgL sin θ − u
I θ = g sin θL − u
mL2
The Handstand Problem: Setup
I Iα =∑τi
I mL2θ = mgL sin θ − u
I θ = g sin θL − u
mL2
What is a State?
I contains ”sufficient information”
I describes system past
I useful for deterministic systems
I state variable, x
I allows us to write x = φ(t, x , u)
What is a State?
I contains ”sufficient information”
I describes system past
I useful for deterministic systems
I state variable, x
I allows us to write x = φ(t, x , u)
What is a State?
I contains ”sufficient information”
I describes system past
I useful for deterministic systems
I state variable, x
I allows us to write x = φ(t, x , u)
What is a State?
I contains ”sufficient information”
I describes system past
I useful for deterministic systems
I state variable, x
I allows us to write x = φ(t, x , u)
What is a State?
I contains ”sufficient information”
I describes system past
I useful for deterministic systems
I state variable, x
I allows us to write x = φ(t, x , u)
Notation
I convenient to ”vectorize”
I x1 = f1(x1, x2, ..., xn)x2 = f2(x1, x2, ..., xn)...xn = fn(x1, x2, ..., xn)
I →I x = f(x)
Notation
I convenient to ”vectorize”
I x1 = f1(x1, x2, ..., xn)x2 = f2(x1, x2, ..., xn)...xn = fn(x1, x2, ..., xn)
I →I x = f(x)
Notation
I convenient to ”vectorize”
I x1 = f1(x1, x2, ..., xn)x2 = f2(x1, x2, ..., xn)...xn = fn(x1, x2, ..., xn)
I →
I x = f(x)
Notation
I convenient to ”vectorize”
I x1 = f1(x1, x2, ..., xn)x2 = f2(x1, x2, ..., xn)...xn = fn(x1, x2, ..., xn)
I →I x = f(x)
The Handstand Problem: Notation
I x1 = θ
I x2 = θ
I x :=
(x1x2
)=
(x2
g sin x1L − u
mL2
)=: f(x,u)
The Handstand Problem: Notation
I x1 = θ
I x2 = θ
I x :=
(x1x2
)=
(x2
g sin x1L − u
mL2
)=: f(x,u)
The Handstand Problem: Notation
I x1 = θ
I x2 = θ
I x :=
(x1x2
)=
(x2
g sin x1L − u
mL2
)=: f(x,u)
Feedback Mechanisms
I plug calculated values in as control
I u = ψ(t, x)
I achieved by measuring physical quantities
I state vs. output feedback
Feedback Mechanisms
I plug calculated values in as control
I u = ψ(t, x)
I achieved by measuring physical quantities
I state vs. output feedback
Feedback Mechanisms
I plug calculated values in as control
I u = ψ(t, x)
I achieved by measuring physical quantities
I state vs. output feedback
Feedback Mechanisms
I plug calculated values in as control
I u = ψ(t, x)
I achieved by measuring physical quantities
I state vs. output feedback
Linearity and Time-Invariance
I linear: x = A(t)x + B(t)u
I time-invariant: x = φ(t, x,u) = f (x,u)
I much simpler mathematically
Linearity and Time-Invariance
I linear: x = A(t)x + B(t)u
I time-invariant: x = φ(t, x,u) = f (x,u)
I much simpler mathematically
Linearity and Time-Invariance
I linear: x = A(t)x + B(t)u
I time-invariant: x = φ(t, x,u) = f (x,u)
I much simpler mathematically
How to Apply the Pole-Shifting Theorem
I assume time-invariance: ∂φ(t,:,:)∂t � 1
I linearize about an equilibrium point (x = 0)
I A =
(∂f1∂x1
∂f1∂x2
∂f2∂x1
∂f2∂x2
)
I B =
(∂f1∂u∂f2∂u
)
How to Apply the Pole-Shifting Theorem
I assume time-invariance: ∂φ(t,:,:)∂t � 1
I linearize about an equilibrium point (x = 0)
I A =
(∂f1∂x1
∂f1∂x2
∂f2∂x1
∂f2∂x2
)
I B =
(∂f1∂u∂f2∂u
)
How to Apply the Pole-Shifting Theorem
I assume time-invariance: ∂φ(t,:,:)∂t � 1
I linearize about an equilibrium point (x = 0)
I A =
(∂f1∂x1
∂f1∂x2
∂f2∂x1
∂f2∂x2
)
I B =
(∂f1∂u∂f2∂u
)
How to Apply the Pole-Shifting Theorem
I assume time-invariance: ∂φ(t,:,:)∂t � 1
I linearize about an equilibrium point (x = 0)
I A =
(∂f1∂x1
∂f1∂x2
∂f2∂x1
∂f2∂x2
)
I B =
(∂f1∂u∂f2∂u
)
The Handstand Problem: Theorem Preparation
I x ≈ Ax + Bu
I A =
(0 1gL 0
)I B =
(0− 1
mL2
)I AB =
(− 1
mL2
0
)
The Handstand Problem: Theorem Preparation
I x ≈ Ax + Bu
I A =
(0 1gL 0
)
I B =
(0− 1
mL2
)I AB =
(− 1
mL2
0
)
The Handstand Problem: Theorem Preparation
I x ≈ Ax + Bu
I A =
(0 1gL 0
)I B =
(0− 1
mL2
)
I AB =
(− 1
mL2
0
)
The Handstand Problem: Theorem Preparation
I x ≈ Ax + Bu
I A =
(0 1gL 0
)I B =
(0− 1
mL2
)I AB =
(− 1
mL2
0
)
Pole-Shifting Theorem Statement
I A(n × n) and B(n ×m) are s.t.rank
([ B AB ... An−1B ]
)= n
I →I ∃F (m × n) s.t. eigenvalues of A + BF are arbitrary
Pole-Shifting Theorem Statement
I A(n × n) and B(n ×m) are s.t.rank
([ B AB ... An−1B ]
)= n
I →
I ∃F (m × n) s.t. eigenvalues of A + BF are arbitrary
Pole-Shifting Theorem Statement
I A(n × n) and B(n ×m) are s.t.rank
([ B AB ... An−1B ]
)= n
I →I ∃F (m × n) s.t. eigenvalues of A + BF are arbitrary
Pole-Shifting Theorem Consequences
I we can make a feedback law!
I u = Fx
I x = (A + BF )x
I control system reduces to a dynamical system!
Pole-Shifting Theorem Consequences
I we can make a feedback law!
I u = Fx
I x = (A + BF )x
I control system reduces to a dynamical system!
Pole-Shifting Theorem Consequences
I we can make a feedback law!
I u = Fx
I x = (A + BF )x
I control system reduces to a dynamical system!
Pole-Shifting Theorem Consequences
I we can make a feedback law!
I u = Fx
I x = (A + BF )x
I control system reduces to a dynamical system!
The Handstand Problem: Theorem Application
I F =(f1 f2
)
I A + BF =
(0 1
gL −
f1mL2
− f2mL2
)I χA+BF = λ2 + λ f2
mL2+ ( f1
mL2− g
L ) = 0
I λ = − f22mL2
± 12
√f2
2
m2L4− 4 f1
mL2+ 4g
L
I
(f2 > 0)&(f1 >f2
2
4mL2+ mgL)
→
Re(λ±) < 0
The Handstand Problem: Theorem Application
I F =(f1 f2
)I A + BF =
(0 1
gL −
f1mL2
− f2mL2
)
I χA+BF = λ2 + λ f2mL2
+ ( f1mL2− g
L ) = 0
I λ = − f22mL2
± 12
√f2
2
m2L4− 4 f1
mL2+ 4g
L
I
(f2 > 0)&(f1 >f2
2
4mL2+ mgL)
→
Re(λ±) < 0
The Handstand Problem: Theorem Application
I F =(f1 f2
)I A + BF =
(0 1
gL −
f1mL2
− f2mL2
)I χA+BF = λ2 + λ f2
mL2+ ( f1
mL2− g
L ) = 0
I λ = − f22mL2
± 12
√f2
2
m2L4− 4 f1
mL2+ 4g
L
I
(f2 > 0)&(f1 >f2
2
4mL2+ mgL)
→
Re(λ±) < 0
The Handstand Problem: Theorem Application
I F =(f1 f2
)I A + BF =
(0 1
gL −
f1mL2
− f2mL2
)I χA+BF = λ2 + λ f2
mL2+ ( f1
mL2− g
L ) = 0
I λ = − f22mL2
± 12
√f2
2
m2L4− 4 f1
mL2+ 4g
L
I
(f2 > 0)&(f1 >f2
2
4mL2+ mgL)
→
Re(λ±) < 0
The Handstand Problem: Theorem Application
I F =(f1 f2
)I A + BF =
(0 1
gL −
f1mL2
− f2mL2
)I χA+BF = λ2 + λ f2
mL2+ ( f1
mL2− g
L ) = 0
I λ = − f22mL2
± 12
√f2
2
m2L4− 4 f1
mL2+ 4g
L
I
(f2 > 0)&(f1 >f2
2
4mL2+ mgL)
→
Re(λ±) < 0
Conclusion
I control theory provides framework
I linearization simplifies problem
I simple rank condition permits use of feedback
I further topics: PID control, feedback linearization, robotics,etc.
I Thanks for your time!
Conclusion
I control theory provides framework
I linearization simplifies problem
I simple rank condition permits use of feedback
I further topics: PID control, feedback linearization, robotics,etc.
I Thanks for your time!
Conclusion
I control theory provides framework
I linearization simplifies problem
I simple rank condition permits use of feedback
I further topics: PID control, feedback linearization, robotics,etc.
I Thanks for your time!
Conclusion
I control theory provides framework
I linearization simplifies problem
I simple rank condition permits use of feedback
I further topics: PID control, feedback linearization, robotics,etc.
I Thanks for your time!
Conclusion
I control theory provides framework
I linearization simplifies problem
I simple rank condition permits use of feedback
I further topics: PID control, feedback linearization, robotics,etc.
I Thanks for your time!