27
Contract Security Guard Services Presented to the Board of County Commissioners March 8, 2011

Contract Security Guard Services Presented to the Board of County Commissioners March 8, 2011

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Contract Security Guard Services Presented to the Board of County Commissioners March 8, 2011

Contract Security Guard Services

Presented to the Board of County Commissioners

March 8, 2011

Page 2: Contract Security Guard Services Presented to the Board of County Commissioners March 8, 2011

Security Guard Services

OutlineHistorical perspectiveCurrent contract reviewState ContractNegotiations with G4SRecommendations

Page 3: Contract Security Guard Services Presented to the Board of County Commissioners March 8, 2011

Security Guard Services

OutlineHistorical perspectiveCurrent contract reviewState ContractNegotiations with G4SRecommendations

Page 4: Contract Security Guard Services Presented to the Board of County Commissioners March 8, 2011

Security Guard Services

Guard Services since 1985 Services instituted following

Courthouse shootings Original services for Courthouse

sites only Contract has grown with County

needs

Page 5: Contract Security Guard Services Presented to the Board of County Commissioners March 8, 2011

Security Guard Services

Prior Contract ProvidersWells Fargo - 1985 / 1990Securex - 1990 / 1994Argenbright - 1994 / 2002G4S Secure Solutions USA* –

2002 / Present

* Formerly Wackenhut

Page 6: Contract Security Guard Services Presented to the Board of County Commissioners March 8, 2011

Security Guard Services

Reasons for changeLack of consistency/reliabilityLow wagesHigh turnover rateSerious management issues Unsettling to Courthouse

occupants

Page 7: Contract Security Guard Services Presented to the Board of County Commissioners March 8, 2011

Security Guard Services

Major Contract Revision in 2002 Require minimum guard pay levels

Improve retention and quality of guard

Enhance Training for screening Improve security at Courthouses & other

sites in response to 9/11

Improve Supervisory requirements

Page 8: Contract Security Guard Services Presented to the Board of County Commissioners March 8, 2011

Security Guard Services

Public/Private Joint Effort at Courthouses Contractor provides

building security and performs scanning role

Sheriff’s Office oversees Court security measures

Page 9: Contract Security Guard Services Presented to the Board of County Commissioners March 8, 2011

Security Guard Services

OutlineHistorical perspectiveCurrent contract reviewState ContractNegotiations with G4SRecommendations

Page 10: Contract Security Guard Services Presented to the Board of County Commissioners March 8, 2011

Security Guard Services

Contract with G4S In 2002 G4S was selected through RFP In 2007 G4S was again selected through

an RFP 3-Year contract started March 1, 2007 2 One Year Renewals Began Year 5 on March 1, 2011 Negotiations for final year began in Dec. 2010

Contract expires February 28, 2012 Current Annual Usage: $5.5 Million

Page 11: Contract Security Guard Services Presented to the Board of County Commissioners March 8, 2011

Security Guard Services

FY 2011 Reduction in Manning Hours/Costs - $956,000 Annually

Courts – 5,096 Hours/$117,309 County Admin – 10,634 Hours/$184,500 Utilities – 17,472 Hours/$254,916 Public Works – 12,922 Hours/$188,532 Fire Rescue – 8,736 Hours/$127,458 Other – 5,772 Hours/$84,324

Page 12: Contract Security Guard Services Presented to the Board of County Commissioners March 8, 2011

Security Guard Services

Courthouses 41%

Corrections/Juvenile Assessment 32 %

Utilities

14%

Offices

13%

Page 13: Contract Security Guard Services Presented to the Board of County Commissioners March 8, 2011

Security Guard Services

Courthouses - 41% Orange County

Courthouse Juvenile Justice Center Winter Park Civil Court Apopka/Ocoee Civil Court

Page 14: Contract Security Guard Services Presented to the Board of County Commissioners March 8, 2011

Security Guard Services

Corrections & Juvenile Assessment - 32%

Corrections Administration

Booking and Release Center

Perimeter Posts

Video Visitation

Juvenile Assessment Center

Page 15: Contract Security Guard Services Presented to the Board of County Commissioners March 8, 2011

Security Guard Services

Utilities Sites - 14% Administration Landfill Presidents Drive Water Reclamation Regional Water

Supply

Page 16: Contract Security Guard Services Presented to the Board of County Commissioners March 8, 2011

Security Guard Services

Offices - 13% Administration Center

IOC I

Regional History Center

Barnett Park

Medical Clinic

Page 17: Contract Security Guard Services Presented to the Board of County Commissioners March 8, 2011

Security Guard Services

TopicsHistorical perspectiveCurrent contract reviewState ContractNegotiations with G4SRecommendations

Page 18: Contract Security Guard Services Presented to the Board of County Commissioners March 8, 2011

Security Guard Services

State Contract for Security Guard Services Basic Security Services

Minimal qualifications contained in RFP

Three Vendors AllegianceAllied BartonG4S Secure Solutions USA

Page 19: Contract Security Guard Services Presented to the Board of County Commissioners March 8, 2011

Security Guard Services

State Contract Concerns Minimal Specifications

Inconsistent or unidentified guard levels

between vendors

No training requirements No site specific training identified No screening training

No Minimum pay levels set Necessary to improve retention and consistent

performance

Page 20: Contract Security Guard Services Presented to the Board of County Commissioners March 8, 2011

Security Guard Services

Use of the State Contract

Specifications do not support County

Operational requirements State does not manage Courthouses Contract does not address screening

requirements

Page 21: Contract Security Guard Services Presented to the Board of County Commissioners March 8, 2011

Security Guard Services

TopicsHistorical perspectiveCurrent contract reviewState ContractNegotiations with G4SRecommendations

Page 22: Contract Security Guard Services Presented to the Board of County Commissioners March 8, 2011

Security Guard Services

Negotiate reduction in Hourly rates with G4S For last year of contract Use State Contract Pricing as basis

Different requirements

Negotiated an Estimated Savings of

$496,276 for last year of contract

Page 23: Contract Security Guard Services Presented to the Board of County Commissioners March 8, 2011

Security Guard Services

Anticipated Usage

Net Savings

Current Contract

$5,528,296 $0.00

State Contract (G4S)

$4,902,783 $625,513

Proposed Rate Reduction

$5,032,020 $496,276

Page 24: Contract Security Guard Services Presented to the Board of County Commissioners March 8, 2011

Security Guard Services

OutlineHistorical perspectiveCurrent contract reviewState ContractNegotiations with G4SRecommendations

Page 25: Contract Security Guard Services Presented to the Board of County Commissioners March 8, 2011

Security Guard Services

Recommendations for RFP Refinements

Security Guard Services divided into 4 Lots #1 – Courthouses & Admin Center #2 – Corrections & Juvenile Assessment Center #3 – Utilities #4 – Other Buildings

Allows for award to multiple vendors Tailors guard requirements to building

requirements Maximize potential savings while maintaining

the appropriate level of security

Page 26: Contract Security Guard Services Presented to the Board of County Commissioners March 8, 2011

Security Guard Services

Recommendations

Accept negotiated hourly rates with G4S

Modify Requirement in the RFP Issue RFP in October 2011 Select firm in December 2011 Transition in February 2012

Page 27: Contract Security Guard Services Presented to the Board of County Commissioners March 8, 2011

Contract Security Guard Services

Presented to the Board of County Commissioners

March 8, 2011