Contract Ingredients

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/28/2019 Contract Ingredients

    1/2

    No. 1 Brunswick Place Southampton SO15 2AN

    Tel: 023 8023 5979 Fax: 023 8063 2849

    Email: [email protected]

    Contract Ingredients

    26 June 2006

    Contract Ingredients

    For a legally binding contract to exist, four key elements must be satisfied:

    (1) Offer; (2) Acceptance; (3) Intention to create legal restrictions; and (4) Consideration.

    You will be surprised at how businesses deal with one another and fail to have valid contracts

    that govern the legal relationship between them!

    A case in point is that of Co-operative Group Ltd v International Computers Ltd [2003), where

    the

    Technology and Construction Court held that Co-op's claim for breach of contract failed

    because no

    contract existed!

    The background to the case is as follows: Co-op took over a grocery business which used ICUs

    software to operate its customer loyalty scheme. As part of the takeover, the existing contract

    with ICL for the software transferred to Co-op. Co-op and ICL then entered into negotiation for

    ICL to develop further software so that the loyalty scheme could be rolled-out into all of Co-op's

    stores.

    At the same time ICL began negotiating with ICL new terms so as to enter into a new contract

    to

    replace the existing contract. The newly developed software was not successful. Co-op broughtproceedings for breach of contract claiming that, even though negotiations had not been

    completed,

    agreement had been reached between it and ICL so as to give rise to a new contract. ICL

    counterclaimed for increased fees under the existing agreement which ICL claimed was

    amended to

    cover its further work.

    The Court held that no new contract had been concluded.

    Case WatchCopyrightEmploymentCommercialInformation TechnologyConsumer LawLitigationMedia LawPatents / DesignsTrade MarksSubscribe to Feeds

    > Pensions - what should an employerdo?> FIFA v Ferrero - Waiting for theFinal Whistle> Disconnection not unlawful> Tapping and Taping a phone call> Domain Names - How Much ShouldI Pay?> A town named sue> A Brief Overview of RegisteredDesigns> Disciplinary action: a quick guide foremployers

    No matter where you are in the

    world, if you are a lawyer or a

    business looking for commercial / IP

    advice - Click here to instruct us

    now.

    Page1of1Contract Ingredients - Commercial Law Articles and News - Lawdit Reading Room

    11/19/2009http://www.lawdit.co.uk/reading_room/room/view_article.asp?name=../articles/Contract...

  • 7/28/2019 Contract Ingredients

    2/2

    It was clear that negotiations between ICL and Co-op for a new contract had not resolved

    issues

    they regarded as fundamental, principally the issue of liquidated damages. Since certain

    fundamental issues were not agreed by the parties, applying settled principles of law, no

    contract

    had come into existence. Co-op conceded that, on the facts, it was not possible to identify an

    offer and an acceptance of that offer but argued that during the course of negotiations, various

    matters which were essential for the conclusion of a binding contract were agreed in principle.

    Co-op argued this meant that, even though other matters - such as liquidated damages - were

    not

    agreed, a contract had come into existence by conduct or implication at some point as a result

    of

    these ongoing negotiations.

    The Court agreed that a contract could theoretically come into existence by conduct or

    implication, but this was unusual. The Court also agreed that it might be possible to find that at

    different times particular matters had been agreed which when aggregated gave rise to a

    binding

    contract. However, it was not for Court to determine what matters were important enough, once

    agreed, to give rise to a binding contract. This was for the parties themselves to determine. In

    this case, both parties clearly regarded the issues of liquidated damages as fundamental and,

    without agreement on this point, no contract was concluded.

    The Court did not agree that the existing contract had been varied to cover the additional work

    carried by ICL. However, under the terms of the existing contract, Co-op was liable to pay ICL

    increased if the existing contract did not run its ful l course (which it had not done). The Court

    held that ICL was entitled to such increased sums (over 1 m).

    The lesson to learn from this is that whilst commercial negotiations take place between parties,

    legal advice should be sought to iron out and agree fundamental issues of the basics of

    contracts

    so as to ensure that a valid, legally binding agreement is concluded and that it exists.

    Izaz Ali

    Home |About

    Us|

    The

    Team|Contact

    Us|

    Legal

    Notices| Sitemap

    Lawdit Solicitors is the trading name of Lawdit Solicitors Ltd.

    Lawdit Solicitors is regulated by the Law Society of England & Wales

    "Commercial lawyers that provide a no -nonsense creative legal service for creative people"

    bookmark and share

    Page2of2Contract Ingredients - Commercial Law Articles and News - Lawdit Reading Room

    11/19/2009http://www.lawdit.co.uk/reading room/room/view article.asp?name=../articles/Contract...