2
7/28/2019 Contested Citation http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/contested-citation 1/2 Mrs. Robyn Redden 217 N. Connell Street Wilmington, Delaware Republic [near 19805] CITY OF WILMINGTON P.O. Box 15404 Wilmington, Delaware 19805-5404 October 4, 2012 AFFIDAVIT OF FACT NON-NEGOTIABLE NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE AND DEMAND FOR FULL DISCLOSURE AND REFUSAL FOR CAUSE WITHOUT DISHONOR - U.C.C. 3-501 Reference: Citation WMX3821550 COMES NOW, the alleged accused Robyn Redden, a „Natural Person‟ and NOT a 14 th  Amendment citizen not a „Nom de Guerre‟ construct, whose substantive rights have been abridged , being In Full Life, under Oath, appearing specially and not generally do state the following. Enclosed please find your (firmly attached) Citation: WMX3821550 City Of Wilmington Automated Traffic Enforcement Division. Commerce operates in truth; demand for truth is made of all parties for full disclosure this date October 4, 2012. I, Robyn Redden, am in receipt of your papers in which you allege to be a citation # WMX3821550 dated 04/20/12 regarding my non-commercial road  machine. I, Robyn Redden, accept your paper. These paper items are "Refused For Cause Without Dishonor" and timely returned to you, pursuant to UCC 3-501, for the following reasons, including but not exclusive to wit: 1) The name "REDDEN ROBYN RASHELLE Q” is not the correct spellin g of my name and therefore is a misnomer not recognized by myself. 2) Your letter asks for voluntary compliance from me. "I Refuse." I will not be held in a state of involuntary servitude/peonage/slavery, as I am neither a Federal nor Statutorily defined "person." 

Contested Citation

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Contested Citation

7/28/2019 Contested Citation

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/contested-citation 1/2

Mrs. Robyn Redden

217 N. Connell Street

Wilmington, Delaware Republic [near 19805]

CITY OF WILMINGTON

P.O. Box 15404

Wilmington, Delaware 19805-5404

October 4, 2012

AFFIDAVIT OF FACT

NON-NEGOTIABLE NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE AND DEMAND FOR 

FULL DISCLOSURE AND REFUSAL FOR CAUSE

WITHOUT DISHONOR - U.C.C. 3-501

Reference: Citation WMX3821550

COMES NOW, the alleged accused Robyn Redden, a „Natural Person‟ and NOT a 14th 

Amendment citizen not a „Nom de Guerre‟ construct, whose substantive rights

have been abridged , being In Full Life, under Oath, appearing specially and

not generally do state the following.

Enclosed please find your (firmly attached) Citation: WMX3821550 City Of

Wilmington Automated Traffic Enforcement Division. Commerce operates in truth; demand for truth is made of all parties for full

disclosure this date October 4, 2012.

I, Robyn Redden, am in receipt of your papers in which you allege to be a

citation # WMX3821550 dated 04/20/12 regarding my non-commercial road 

 machine.

I, Robyn Redden, accept your paper.

These paper items are "Refused For Cause Without Dishonor" and timely

returned to you, pursuant to UCC 3-501, for the following reasons, includingbut not exclusive to wit: 1) The name "REDDEN ROBYN RASHELLE Q” is not the correct spelling of my name

and therefore is a misnomer not recognized by myself. 2) Your letter asks for voluntary compliance from me. "I Refuse." I will not

be held in a state of involuntary servitude/peonage/slavery, as I am neither

a Federal nor Statutorily defined "person." 

Page 2: Contested Citation

7/28/2019 Contested Citation

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/contested-citation 2/2

3) Neither REDDEN ROBYN RASHELLE Q (straw man) nor Mrs. Robyn Redden (Living

Being) has any knowledge of a contract with the City of Wilmington or The

City of Wilmington Red Light Camera Safety Program, or your organization,

knowingly signed by myself. No one can be held liable for any contract that

does not bear his signature. 4) No affidavit of injury accompanies your paper items; and REDDEN ROBYNRASHELLE Q (straw man) and Mrs. Robyn Redden (Living Being) DENY that such an

injured party exists.

5) A lack of „Corpus Delicti‟ – there is no injured party.

6) The absence of a sworn Affidavit, Oath or Affirmation accompanying said

citation.

7) The use of the term “traffic” in relation to an alleged offense is a

deception and misrepresentation of the truth. [Refer to: Northern Pacific

R.R. Co. vs. Schoenfeldt, 213 P. 26.

8) In this case, the word “traffic ” is used in conjunction with theunnecessary AUTO Transportation Service, or in other words, “vehicles for 

hire.” The word “traffic ” is another word which is to be strictly construed

to the conducting of business.

9) “Traffic – Commerce, trade, sale or exchange of merchandise, bills, money,

or the like. The passing of goods and commodities from one person to another

for an equivalent in goods or money…” 

10) The use of terms in your presentment such as motor vehicle or vehicle is

deceptive and is only applicable to those who conduct commerce via there

commercial vehicle.

The term ‘motor vehicle’ is different and broader than the word ‘automobile.’

City of Dayton vs. DeBrosse, 23 NE. 2d 647, 650; 62 Ohio App.232

Further, I, Robyn Redden (Living Being) have not waived and will not waive

subject matter or persona jurisdiction. I Robyn Redden, has and will always demand all of her God-given Nature

supported unalienable rights and liberties, waiving none at any time for any

reason, including but not limited to her unalienable right to time and the

right to "be let alone."  Without Prejudice, UCC 1-207.

Respectfully, 

Robyn Redden

sui juris, sui generis