Upload
tranphuc
View
215
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
02.05.2017
1
Hessische Lehrkräfteakademie
Sanja Wagner, SSA Darmstadt,
Member of TEA-Circle, BAG
and IATEFL Testing-Evaluation-Assessment-SIG
Content Based Teaching and Learning:
Possibilities of Assessment
Hessische Lehrkräfteakademie
The content
2
� CLIL methodology and framework ( Do Coyle et al.)
� Planing tools and areas of assessment
� Learning goals and learning activities in CLIL
� Criterion referenced testing & assessment
� Balance between self- and external assessment
� Reliability vs. validity
ASSESSMENT TOOLS
� Valid (calibrated) criteria for assessing language competences
» Cambridge
» Revised CEFR scales 2016 –> importance for CLIL
� Rubrics – qualitative criterion referenced assessment grids for content
and text production (examples)
02.05.2017
2
Hessische Lehrkräfteakademie
S. Wagner, Schwalbach 2017 3
challengingauthentic
Content based teaching and learning
� Setting up a framework for a task or project
� Pupils work on their own tasks according to their
agreement within their group
� Collaborative learning
� Pupils use the texts/internet sites independently
� Experiential learning
� Language awareness
� Teacher coaches, helps
� Presentation, evaluation
� Reflexion on the learning process and teamwork
meaningful
Hessische Lehrkräfteakademie
CLIL Framework:
Do Coyle, Philip Hood and David Marsh: CLIL
Based on their experience of CLIL in secondary schools, primary schools and English language schools
across Europe. CUP 20104
02.05.2017
3
Hessische Lehrkräfteakademie
Using language to learn
whilst learning to use language
https://www.slideshare.net/jfarre35/whats-clil?next_slideshow=1 5
Hessische Lehrkräfteakademie
The greatest challenge for CLIL teachers is to develop
materials and tasks which are linguistically accessible and at
the same time cognitively demanding.
6
02.05.2017
4
Hessische Lehrkräfteakademie
Do Coyle: Planing tools for teachers
KEY ISSUES
� Take a content text and analyse it for the language of learning –
how do you prioritise language needs? What tasks will you
design to learn and remember the new language? (Stage 1)
� Now add the language for learning- consider classroom language
and tasks associated with the text eg if you want the students to
discuss issues or engage in group work, how can they do
this well in a different language?
� Try to apply Bloom’s Taxonomy to the tasks. Which skills are
appropriate to develop given the context and the content?
What about cultural awareness?
� Reflect on how differently you might have used the text in either a
language lesson or a mother tongue subject lesson.
7
D. Coyle 2005
Hessische Lehrkräfteakademie
S. Wagner, Schwalbach 2017 8
How to organize larger projects
Selfassessment
Learner
Autonomy
Transparency
� What are we going to
work on?
� What kind of
presentation ?
� set up a rough plan
� appoint tasks
� keep your log book
�monitor the process
� develop formats for
selfassessment
and monitoring
Decide on criteria for (self)-
assessment step by step
� language competence
� teamwork
� visuals
Attainment targets
02.05.2017
5
Hessische Lehrkräfteakademie
S. Wagner, Schwalbach 2017 9
Learning goals
� Gain knowledge by listening to and reading multiple texts about a nonfiction topic
� Infer information from the texts using a graphic organizer or mind-mapping
� Apply the information from their reading and graphic organizers to the creation of a script
� Work collaboratively both to design visuals and write the script for the talk or do hands-on experiments through scientific enquiry
Based on Cognitive Academic Language Proficiency (CALP)
(the context-reduced language of the academic classroom)
Hessische Lehrkräfteakademie
S. Wagner, Schwalbach 2017 10
Pupils‘ objectives
� Develop reading fluency by using different techniques: skimming, scanning, cloze reading
� Students use spoken, written, and visual language to accomplish their task
� Present a topic using adequate expression, volume, body language, fluency, and accuracy of delivery
02.05.2017
6
Hessische Lehrkräfteakademie
S. Wagner, Schwalbach 2017 11
Learning activities in CLIL classes
� Working collaboratively throughout the project allows students to acquire new information, increase their knowledge and develop literacy and language skills, while also promoting other essential skills such as problem solving and learning to work in teams.
� Students apply a wide range of strategies to comprehend, interpret, evaluate, and appreciate texts. They draw on their prior experience, knowledge of the world, their knowledge of word meaning and of other texts, their word identification strategies, and their understanding of textual features .
Hessische Lehrkräfteakademie
CLIL Framework
12
02.05.2017
7
Hessische Lehrkräfteakademie
Collaborative learning
� What shall I / we do / read?
� How shall I / we do it?
� Why do I / we do it this way?
� What am I good at?
� What am I not good at?
� What is my next target/ goal?
� How well do I collaborate in
the team?
13S. Wagner, Schwalbach 2017
• Bullet points for
content
• Presentation/visuals/
media
• Activities outside the
classroom
• Selfassessment grids
with space for
teachers‘s comment
• rubrics
Hessische Lehrkräfteakademie
Criterion-referenced testing
What is the benefit of CRT?
� to see how well students have learned the knowledge and skills which they are expected to have mastered.
� All skills productive as well as receptive must be included (however not all at one time)
� This information may be used as one piece of information to determine how well the student is learning the desired curriculum and how well the teacher is teaching that curriculum.
14S. Wagner, Schwalbach 2017
02.05.2017
8
Hessische Lehrkräfteakademie
Balance between self-assessment
and external assessment� Using self-assessment (referring to CEFR) the pupils get aware of
skills they need and they learn the criteria for their performance step
by step.
� Formative testing in FL/CLIL classes must use the same criteria and
formats of tasks so that the result can be a
� confirmation of the self-assessment
� controll and corrective
15S. Wagner, Schwalbach 2017
Thus the test provides a transparent and valid basis for
grading the student achievements.
Hessische Lehrkräfteakademie
Reliability
If somebody else evaluates the performance/test, will he get
the same result? ( interrater reliability)
If the same person evaluates the test at different times, is
the result the same? (intrarater reliability)
� Written/Spoken tasks with bullet points
to control content
� Explicit criteria for assessment of speaking/
writing at different levels
� Reading skills (closed – open formats)
16S. Wagner, Schwalbach 2017
02.05.2017
9
Hessische Lehrkräfteakademie
Validity
Are we testing what we want to test?
» Content
» Organizing ideas
» Receptive skills
» Team work/ collaboration
» Language production
− Successfull communication
−Correctnes/accuracy
− pronunciation
17S. Wagner, Schwalbach 2017
Face
validity
Hessische Lehrkräfteakademie
The content
18
� CLIL methodology and framework ( Do Coyle et al.)
� Planing tools and areas of assessment
� Learning goals and learning activities in CLIL
� Criterion referenced testing & assessment
� Balance between self- and external assessment
� Reliability vs. validity
ASSESSMENT TOOLS
� Valid (calibrated) criteria for assessing language competences
» Cambridge
» Revised CEFR scales 2016 –> importance for CLIL
� Rubrics – qualitative criterion referenced assessment grids for content
and text production (examples)
02.05.2017
10
Hessische Lehrkräfteakademie
S. Wagner, Schwalbach 2017 19
Hessische Lehrkräfteakademie
Brain North
The aim of the CEFR is to provide a mental framework that enables
people to say where they were, not a specification telling them where
they ought to be. Right at the very beginning of the CEFR, the authors
emphasise that
� The key to success is for users to appreciate that a common
framework is a descriptive metasystem that is intended as a reference
point, not as a tool to be implemented without further elaboration
and adaptation to local circumstances.
©B.North, The CEFR Common Reference Levels: validated reference
points and local strategies ; 2007
20S. Wagner, Schwalbach 2017
02.05.2017
11
Hessische Lehrkräfteakademie
S. Wagner, Schwalbach 2017 21
CEFR Assessment Tools:
HOLISTIC
ANALYTIC
CHECKLISTS.
Hessische Lehrkräfteakademie
S. Wagner, Schwalbach 2017 22
02.05.2017
12
Hessische Lehrkräfteakademie
S. Wagner, Schwalbach 2017 23
Hessische Lehrkräfteakademie
Revision of CEFR Scales 2016
24
02.05.2017
14
Hessische Lehrkräfteakademie
Reception
27
Hessische Lehrkräfteakademie
Co
mm
un
ica
tive
La
ng
ua
ge
co
mp
ete
nc
es
28
02.05.2017
15
Hessische Lehrkräfteakademie
Interaction
29
Hessische Lehrkräfteakademie
Interaction
30
02.05.2017
16
Hessische Lehrkräfteakademie
Rubrics: qualitative criterion based grids
31
Hessische Lehrkräfteakademie
Rubistar.4teachers.org
32
02.05.2017
17
Hessische Lehrkräfteakademie
Example of a template: Class debate
33
Hessische Lehrkräfteakademie
http://www.rcampus.com/
34