Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
CONSUMERS’ PERCEPTION AND CONSUMERS’ ATTITUDE
TOWARDS SAMPOERNA A’MILD AS PIONEER BRAND AND STAR
MILD AS FOLLOWER BRAND IN WEST JAKARTA
Written By:
ABDUL HAFIDH
STUDENT ID : 604081000001
FACULTY OF ECONOMICS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
UIN SYARIF HIDAYATULLAH JAKARTA
2010
CONSUMERS’ PERCEPTION AND CONSUMERS’ ATTITUDE
TOWARDS SAMPOERNA A’MILD AS PIONEER BRAND AND STAR
MILD AS FOLLOWER BRAND IN WEST JAKARTA
Thesis
Submitted to Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences
As Partial Requirement for Acquiring the Bachelor Degree of Economics
Submitted by:
Abdul Hafidh
604081000001
Under Supervision of
INTERNATIONAL CLASS PROGRAM
MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
FACULTY OF ECONOMICS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
UIN SYARIF HIDAYATULLAH
JAKARTA
1431 H / 2010 M
CONSUMERS’ PERCEPTION AND CONSUMERS’ ATTITUDE
TOWARDS SAMPOERNA A’MILD AS PIONEER BRAND AND STAR
MILD AS FOLLOWER BRAND IN WEST JAKARTA
Thesis
Submitted to Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences
As Partial Requirement for Acquiring the Bachelor Degree of Economics
Submitted by:
Abdul Hafidh
604081000001
Under Supervision of
INTERNATIONAL CLASS PROGRAM
MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
FACULTY OF ECONOMICS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
UIN SYARIF HIDAYATULLAH
JAKARTA
1431 H / 2010 M
Today, we administered a comprehensive examination to Abdul Hafidh, ID
604081000001. The title of his thesis is “Consumers’ Perception and
Consumers’ Attitude Towards Sampoerna A’Mild as Pioneer Brand and
Star Mild as Follower Brand in West Jakarta”. After proper examination of
the student, we have decided that he has met all of the requirements for the title of
Bachelor of Economics on the field of Management, State Islamic University
Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
Jakarta, March 3rd, 2010
Comprehensive Examination Team
AUTOBIOGRAPHY
Name : Abdul Hafidh
Birth Place / Day : Jakarta / October 9th 1986
Gender : Male
Address : Jl. Nanas No.1 RT 011/RW 002 Kelurahan Jatipulo Kecamatan
Palmerah Kota Administrasi Jakarta Barat 11430
Religion : Islam
Nationality : Indonesia
Hometown : Bima, West Nusa Tenggara
Hobbies : Reading, playing badminton, playing computer, and watching
cinemas
Formal Education
: 1989 – 1991 1991 – 1998
1998 – 2001 2001 – 2004
TK Aisyiah Jakarta SD Negeri Cideng 10 Cilamaya Jakarta
SLTP Negeri 1 Jakarta SMU Negeri 4 Jakarta
Non-formal
Education
: 1992 – 1998 2002 – 2003
2003 – 2004
2004 – 2005
Islamic Education at Al Azhar Jakarta English Course “Basic Levels” at LB-LIA Jakarta English Course until Intermediate 3 “Intermediate Levels” at LB-LIA Jakarta English Course “English Supporting Program” at Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University of Jakarta
Organizational
Experiences
: 2006 – Current Remaja Muslim Muhammadiyah Tomang
Life Principle
: Study Hard, Work Hard, Play Hard, Pray Harder
ABSTRAKSI
Dewasa ini persaingan dalam pemasaran produk dan jasa didalam negeri menjadi sangat ketat. Perusahaan produsen mengeluarkan dana yang sangat besar untuk membiayai promosi dan mendanai riset dan pengembangan produknya. Semua hal ini dilakukan untuk menambah pangsa pasar menjadi market leader dalam penjualan produksinya. Perusahaan-perusahaan yang merintis atau yang pertama dalam memasarkan suatu jenis produk harus terus berusaha untuk mempertahankan posisinya diatas pesaingnya. Hal ini tidaklah mudah karena, karena pesaing juga berusaha keras untuk merebut posisi sebagai market leader.
Sampoerna A’Mild merupakan salah satu jenis merek perintis. Sampoerna A’Mild merupakan merek pertama untuk jenis produk rokok rendah tar dan nikotin. Beberapa merek pengikut adalah Star Mild, LA Mild, X Mild, dll. Jika kita dapat mengetahui sikap dan tanggapan konsumen serta apakah kedua variabel ini berpengaruh terhadap isu merek perintis dan pengikut, maka kita dapat membantu produsen Sampoerna A’Mild untuk meningkatkan atau mempertahankan posisinya sebagai market leader dan Star Mild untuk meningkatkan daya saingnya di pangsa pasar dengan jenis rokok rendah tar dan nikotin.
Dalam penelitian ini metode yang digunakan adalah multiple regression dan 100 sampel dari kalangan minimal pendidikan SMU se-Jakarta Barat, maka hasil yang didapat adalah bahwa konsumen memiliki persepsi positif dan sikap positif terhadap Sampoerna A’Mild sebagai rokok perintis dan Star Mild sebagai rokok pengikut.
Berdasarkan uraian diatas, sebaiknya Philip Morris & Co., Ltd., Inc. selaku produsen rokok Sampoerna A’Mild tetap mempertahankan posisinya sebagai market leader dengan tetap memberikan promosi yang gencar dan terus memberikan atau menyediakan informasi tentang produknya tersebut dan Bentoel Group selaku produsen rokok Star Mild untuk terus memasarkan produknya melalui televisi, majalah dan koran agar mutu, manfaat dan rasa dari rokok Star Mild dapat diterima konsumen.
Kata kunci: persepsi konsumen, sikap konsumen, merek perintis, merek pengikut
ABSTRACT
Nowadays, the competition in the marketing of product and services in the Indonesia’s domestic market is very tight. The producer's company spent a huge amount of fund to finance the promotion, and Research and Development of its products and services. All of this is done to achieve a greater market share and to be a market leader. The companies that were actually pioneered in the marketing of certain kind of products always trying to position themselves above all of their competitors. This is not an easy task, because their competitors will also try hard to seize the position of market leader.
Sampoerna A'Mild is the pioneer brand of cigarette with low tar and low nicotine. Several follower brands including Star Mild, La Mild, Bentoel Mild, X Mild, etc. If we discovered the consumer’s perception and attitudes towards Sampoerna A'Mild, then we could help the producer of Sampoerna A'Mild to increase or maintain his position in the market, the same thing was also happen for the producer of follower brands.
In this research, the method conducted is multiple regression and 100 samples from people with minimum education of High School in West Jakarta, then the result of the research is that consumer have a positive perception and attitude towards Sampoerna A’Mild as pioneer brand and Star Mild as follower brand.
From above explanation, it would be better for Philip Morris & Co., Ltd., Inc. as producer of Sampoerna A’Mild to maintain the position of market leader by keep promoting and keep provide information about the product, and also for Bentoel Group as producer of Star Mild to do a more intense marketing through television, magazines, and newspapers to deliver their quality, benefit and good taste to the consumers. Keyword: consumers’ perception, consumers’ attitude, pioneer brand, follower brand
PREFACE
Bismillaahirrahmaanirrahiim.
Assalamu’alaikum Warahmatullaahi Wabarakaatuh.
Alhamdulillahirabbil ‘alamin, all praised be to Allah, God of universe, the
Almighty on everything, that the writer have given the strength to complete this
thesis with the title: “Consumers’ Perception and Consumers’ Attitude Towards
Sampoerna A’Mild as Pioneer Brand and Star Mild as Follower Brand in West
Jakarta", all that is because of Allah’s permission. Shalawat as well as greetings it
is hoped will continue to fall to the Prophet Muhammad SAW, Allah’s personal
choice human kind who is uswah for all of us.
In this chance, the writer would like to thank and appreciate the following
parties that have supported, motivated, and help the writer, especially to:
1. My beloved parents, Aji H. Djafar Sidik, S.H. and Umi Hj. Ragoan, for all the
love, pray, tears of happiness and sadness, trust and encouragement so that I
can finish this thesis. I sincerely love you both from my deepest heart.
2. My cool and awesome lil’ bro, Faisal Azhar for his patience and support all
this time.
3. My beloved brothers and sisters, Kak Diah, Kak Ida, Bang Anwar and Aba
Emo for all support, pray and encouragement.
4. My beloved brothers and sisters, Kak Ani, Kak Sari, Bang Nur, Bang Fatah,
Kak Reni, Kak Eri and Alm. Mas Joko for the support.
5. My nephew Bang Jul, for helping me finding the topic for my thesis.
6. Mr. Prof. Dr. Ahmad Rodhoni, M.M. as my thesis supervisor I who always
encourage me and for helping with his lecture, help, contribution, and time
that he has sacrificed in order for me to complete this thesis.
7. Mr. Dr. Ahmad Dumyati Bashori, BA, MA. as my thesis supervisor II for
helping me with his lecture, help, contribution, and time that he has sacrificed
in order for me to complete this thesis.
8. Mr. Prof. Dr. Abdul Hamid, M.S., as Dean of Faculty of Economic and Social
Sciences State Islamic University of Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.
9. Mr. Arief Mufraini, Lc, M.Si. as the Head of International Program.
10. Special thanks to my awesome friends Fajar, Andal and Sofyan for helping me
during my research. I owe you all.
11. All alumni of 1st batch who always telling me jokes, giving me spirits and
supports all this time.
12. My friends Khalil, Rio, Awan, Isma, Novi and Acyd as we have shared good
times together and everyone in International Program that could not be
mentioned one by one.
13. All the staff in International Program Office for handling the required
documents especially Mr. Sugi and Mrs. Atikah.
14. Monon Clan members, Monon-sama Bono ”bono-zero” , Sofyan “garuda69”,
Andal “vogue”, Savirul “sav-godrics”, Fajar “didi” and Uriq “she-kills”. You
guys rocks.
15. Asus A42J for limitless contribution, my dependent partner, hail on you.
16. My handy 2GB Kingston thumb drive for maximum mobile data transfer.
17. Telkom Speedy for internet connection to let me connect to virtual along with
surfing for International Journals.
18. The legendarily powerful yet efficient Toyota Kijang for making me
conveniently moves from one place to another.
I realized that perfection is own by Allah SWT and human being is just be
able to endeavor. Hopefully this thesis can be useful for the next generations.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
VALIDATION PAPER ................................................................................ i
APPROVAL OF COMPREHENSIVE EXAM PAPER ................................. iii
AUTOBIOGRAPHY .................................................................................... iv
ABSTRACT ................................................................................................. v
PREFACE .................................................................................................... vii
TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................................................................. ix
LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................ xii
LIST OF PICTURES .................................................................................... xv
I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. 1
A. Background Problem ...................................................................... 1
B. Problem Formulation ...................................................................... 5
C. The Purpose and Benefits of Research ............................................ 6
II. LITERATURE REVIEW ...................................................................... 7
A. The Definition of Product ............................................................... 7
B. The Definition of Brand ................................................................. 8
1. Power of Brand in Market ....................................................... 10
2. Branding Decision ................................................................... 11
3. Branding Strategy.................................................................... 13
C. The Definition of Consumer Behavior ............................................ 13
1. Motivation............................................................................... 16
2. Perception ............................................................................... 16
3. Learning .................................................................................. 17
4. Learning Theories ................................................................... 18
5. Applying Learning Theories to Marketing Decisions ............... 20
6. Attitude ................................................................................... 21
7. Decision Making ..................................................................... 22
D. Theoritical Framework ................................................................... 24
E. Hypothesis ..................................................................................... 26
III. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY ........................................................... 27
A. Research Scope .............................................................................. 27
B. Sampling Method ........................................................................... 27
C. Data Collection Method .................................................................. 27
1. Primary Data ........................................................................... 28
2. Secondary Data ....................................................................... 29
D. Data Analysis Method .................................................................... 30
1. Descriptive Analysis ............................................................... 30
2. Analysis Method ..................................................................... 33
3. The Classic Assumption Test Multiple Regression .................. 38
E. Operational Variable ...................................................................... 42
1. Independent Variable .............................................................. 42
2. Dependent Variable ................................................................. 42
IV. FINDING AND RESULT ..................................................................... 46
A. Companies Background .................................................................. 46
1. Philip Morris&Co., Ltd., Inc.................................................... 46
2. Bentoel Group ......................................................................... 47
B. General Illustration of Research Object .......................................... 48
1. Location and Time of the Research ......................................... 48
2. Characteristics of Respondents ................................................ 49
C. Finding and Result ......................................................................... 53
1. Validity Test ........................................................................... 53
2. Reliability Test ........................................................................ 53
3. Descriptive Analysis ............................................................... 54
D. Classical Assumption Test .............................................................. 82
1. Autocorrelation Test ................................................................ 82
2. Multicollinearity...................................................................... 83
3. Heteroskesdastisity .................................................................. 85
4. Normality Data ........................................................................ 86
E. Multiple Linear Regression ............................................................ 87
1. Regression Test and Coefficient Correlation ............................ 87
2. Coefficient Determination ....................................................... 89
3. F Test ...................................................................................... 90
4. t test ........................................................................................ 91
V. CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION ................................................... 94
A. Conclusion ..................................................................................... 94
B. Suggestion ...................................................................................... 95
REFERENCE ............................................................................................... 97
APPENDICE ................................................................................................ 99
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1.1. Table Performance of Sampoerna A’Mild in West Jakarta…….. 4
Table 3.2. Table Performance of Star Mild in West Jakarta………………. 4
Table 3.1. Category High and Low Reliability Instrument………………... 33
Table 3.2. Category High and Low Reliability Instrument Durbin
Watson…………………………………………………………..
39
Table 3.3. Operational Variable Analysis………………………………….. 43
Table 4.1. Table Performance of Philip Morris&Co., Ltd., Inc……………. 47
Table 4.2. Distribution of Questionnaires………………………………….. 49
Table 4.3. Characteristics of Respondents…………………………………. 50
Table 4.4. Tryout Results of Consumers’ Perception and Consumers’
Attitude Towards Sampoerna A’Mild as Pioneer Brand and Star
Mild as Follower Brand…………………………………………
52
Table 4.5. Tryout Results of Consumers’ Perception and Consumers’
Attitude………………………………………………………….
54
Table 4.6. The Importance of Status Between Pioneer Brands and
Follower Brands in Consumers’ Mind…………………………..
55
Table 4.7. The Degree of Favorable Perceptions Between Sampoerna
A’Mild as Pioneer Brands and Follower Brands in Consumer’s
Mind……………………………………………………………..
56
Table 4.8. The Preference of Consumption Between Sampoerna A’Mild
and Star Mild Because of Pioneer and Follower Status…………
58
Table 4.9. The Quality of Sampoerna A’Mild as Pioneer Brands and Star
Mild as Follower Brands in Consumer’s Mind…………………
60
Table 4.10. The Benefit of Sampoerna A’Mild as Pioneer Brands and Star
Mild as Follower Brands in Consumer’s Mind…………………
62
Table 4.11. The Taste of Sampoerna A’Mild as Pioneer Brands and Star
Mild as Follower Brands in Consumer’s Mind…………………
64
Table 4.12. The Advertisement Attraction of Sampoerna A’Mild as Pioneer
Brands and Star Mild as Follower Brands in Consumer’s
Mind……………………………………………………………..
66
Table 4.13. The Packaging Attraction of Sampoerna A’Mild as Pioneer
Brands and Star Mild as Follower Brands in Consumer’s
Mind……………………………………………………………..
68
Table 4.14. The Representation of Simbolization Status of Sampoerna
A’Mild as Pioneer Brands and Star Mild as Follower Brands in
Consumer’s Mind……………………………………………….
70
Table 4.15. The Purchasing Behavior of Sampoerna A’Mild as Pioneer
Brands and Star Mild as Follower Brands Because of Families
or Friends Suggestion…………………………………………...
72
Table 4.16. The Purchasing Behavior of Sampoerna A’Mild as Pioneer
Brands and Star Mild as Follower Brands Because of Attractive
Advertisement…………………………………………………..
74
Table 4.17. The Consumption of Sampoerna A’Mild as Pioneer Brands and
Star Mild as Follower Brands 2 Packs Per Day…………………
76
Table 4.18. The Consumption of Sampoerna A’Mild as Pioneer Brands and
Star Mild as Follower Brands 5 Slops Per Month………………
78
Table 4.19. The Loyalty of Purchasing and Consuming Sampoerna A’Mild
as Pioneer Brands and Star Mild as Follower Brands…………..
80
Table 4.20. Durbin Watson………………………………………………….. 82
Table 4.21. Autocorrelation Test Model Summaryb………………………… 82
Table 4.22. Multicollinearity Test Coefficientsa…………………………….. 84
Table 4.23. Result of Multiple Regression Coefficientsa……………………. 87
Table 4.24. Coefficient Determination (R2) Model Summaryb……………... 89
Table 4.25. F Test ANOVAb………………………………………………… 90
Table 4.26. Test Results of t-test……………………………………………. 91
LIST OF PICTURES
Picture 2.1 The Influence of Consumer Background Characteristics and
Behavioral Process Towards Consumer Purchase
Activities………………………………………………………
23
Graphic 4.1 Heteroskesdastisity Scatterplot……………………………….. 85
Graphic 4.2 Normality P-Plot of Regression Standardized Residual……… 86
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
A. Background Problem
Nowadays, the competition in the marketing of product and services in
the Indonesia’s domestic market is very tight. The producer's company spent
a huge amount of fund to finance the promotion, and Research and
Development of its products and services. All of this is done to achieve a
greater market share and to be a market leader. The companies that were
actually pioneered in the marketing of certain kind of products always trying
to position themselves above all of their competitors. This is not an easy task,
because their competitors will also try hard to seize the position of market
leader. Moreover, there are some of the competitors that actually successful in
seizing the position of market leader from pioneer company and maintaining
it so the position can’t be taken by another companies including the pioneer
company. When some kind of products marketed for the first time, the brand
that was use on the products will always embedded in the consumer’s mind
for a long time, This is become the advantage for the pioneer company
(Alpert, 1995:34).
The use of brand on a product has a very important meaning for the
company that use the brand and for the consumers that bought the product as
well. In mid-centuries, the goods that were sold in the market didn’t use any
kind of brand, label and/or name of the suppliers (Kotler, 2006:256). For the
suppliers that supply goods with good qualities, this could cause a loss to
them, because their good-quality products can’t be differentiated with another
low-quality product from other suppliers. Nowadays, the use of brand has
become a significant factor in the market. Brand not only signifies a name,
but it also characterized the special characteristic of a newly marketed
product.
There are various brands that compete in a market and their power to
compete in a market is vary as well. They include pioneer brands and
follower brands.
According to Alpert (Alpert, 1995:38), pioneer brand is the very first
brand of a new type of product which comes to market while the follower
brand is all brand of the same type of product that enter the market after the
pioneer brand.
According to Alpert (Alpert, 1995:36), the relationship between status of
pioneer and follower brand with perception is because the pioneer brand is
the subject’s first experience with the product, it frames a subject’s
perceptions of the product category and becomes the category prototype.
While the relations between the relationship between status of pioneer
and follower brand with consumers’ attitude is the consumers find themselves
to have a positive attitude toward pioneer brands in general, which partially
explained by the favorable perception of pioneer brands.
The cigarettes industry in Indonesia is intensely developed. This can be
seen by the development of market share this past period. There has been four
big cigarettes company in domestic market and some of small cigarettes
company and also there are some cigarettes companies from foreign
investors.
Four big cigarettes companies including: Gudang Garam, Sampoerna,
Djarum and Bentoel, and from the foreign-investors cigarettes companies
including Marlboro, Kansas, Dunhill, etc. Another cigarettes domestic
companies including Minak Djinggo, Gentong etc.
Sampoerna A'Mild is the pioneer brand of cigarette with low tar and low
nicotine. Several follower brands including Star Mild, La Mild, Bentoel Mild,
X Mild, etc.
Before it was acquired by PT. Philip Morris Indonesia, PT. HM.
Sampoerna firstly built in the form of family business with its product Dji
Sam Soe. In 1992, the increase in the PT. HM. Sampoerna’s market share
occurred, it is because HM. Sampoerna developed the low-tar and low-
nicotine cigarette product known by the brand Sampoerna A’Mild. And
because of the significant increases of PT. HM. Sampoerna Tbk cigarettes
market share, than in Mei 2005 PT. Philip Morris Indonesia decided to
acquire the majority of PT. HM. Sampoerna Tbk shares with the price of Rp.
10.600 per share.
In West Jakarta market, over past 5 years from year 2005 – 2009, the
performance of Sampoerna A’Mild as the pioneer brand of low tar and low
nicotine cigarette keep increasing and keep maintaining its position as market
leader, while the performance of Star Mild as the follower brand is also
increasing but it couldn’t seize the position of market leader from Sampoerna
A’Mild. The data is explained as follows.
Table 1.1.
Table Performance of Sampoerna A’Mild
In West Jakarta
Year 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005
Net Revenues (Rp.
Bill)
1,117.44 1,025.52 997.43 873.96 785.17
Operating Income
(Rp. Bill)
180.72 163.28 154.86 151.37 145.34
Cigarette Volume
(Units in Mill)
1,730.25 1,522.34 1,443.27 1,407.53 1,378.27
Source: Indonesia Stock Exchange
Table 1.2.
Table Performance of Star Mild
In West Jakarta
Year 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005
Net Revenues (Rp.
Bill)
976.49 931.08 823.14 711.43 672.51
Operating Income
(Rp. Bill)
165.22 143.16 129.85 118.74 103.45
Cigarette Volume
(Units in Mill)
1,533.45 1,349.78 1,254.05 1,137.52 1,045.90
Source: Indonesia Stock Exchange
Based on the data performance above, both brands have an increased in
performance during 2005-2009. However, Sampoerna A’Mild as the pioneer
brand can keep maintains its position above Star Mild.
If we discovered the consumer’s perception and attitudes towards
Sampoerna A'Mild, then we could help the producer of Sampoerna A'Mild to
increase or maintain his position in the market, the same thing was also
happen for the producer of follower brands.
Then, based on this background problem, the writer will write this thesis
with a title:
“CONSUMERS’ PERCEPTION AND CONSUMERS’ ATTITUDE
TOWARDS SAMPOERNA A’MILD AS PIONEER BRAND AND STAR
MILD AS FOLLOWER BRAND IN WEST JAKARTA”
B. Problem Formulation
Based on the thesis title that the writer has stated above, the problem that
becomes main concern in this thesis is how the consumers’ perception and
consumers’ attitude towards Sampoerna A’Mild as pioneer brand and Star
Mild as follower brand?
C. The Purpose and Benefits of Research
1. The Purpose of Research
The purpose of research that the writer wants to achieve is to analyze the
consumers’ perception and consumers’ attitude towards Sampoerna
A’Mild as pioneer brand and Star Mild as follower brand.
2. The Benefits of Research
a. To apply the sciences that the writer obtained during study at State
Islamic University of Syarif Hidayatullah and as a form of
contribution to the society based on the writers major of study in the
university.
b. To become an input and consideration for other parties in the form of
final result and information from this research. Especially for the
company that produce pioneer brand product so they can see and
discover the results of this research. For the follower brand, they can
use this research as different approach to attract the consumers.
CHAPTER II
LITERATURE REVIEW
D. The Definition of Product
According to Philip Kotler (Kotler, 2006:344), a product is anything that
can be offered to a market to satisfy a want or need, it can be in the form of
physical goods, services, experiences, events, persons, places, properties,
organizations, informations, and ideas”.
According to Bennet (Bennet, 2001:26), a product is anything an
organization or individual offer exchange that may satisfy customer’s or
consumer’s needs or the marketer own need and he also stated that also stated
product may be a tangible good, an intangible benefit in the form of service,
or even an idea, it may even be person ‘packaged’ for the public.
The Core Product according to Bennet (Bennet, 2001:285) is the basic
good or serviced purchased, aside from its packaging and accompanying
service while core benefit is the need that product fulfills or the problems its
solve. The attributes that supported the core product includes:
1. The package, which includes wrapper, picture, and label that put was
embedded on the product. Its main function is to protect the product.
Besides that, it is also beneficial to promote the product, to give
information, and to attract the consumers.
2. The Product Servicing, which is the maintenance of the product so that it
can work well and the beneficial factors of the product don’t diminish.
3. Warranties, which is the guarantee from the sellers that the product they
sell will meet the consumers’ needs, or if the products failed to meet the
consumers’ needs than the sellers will give compensation to the
purchasers.
4. Brand Image, is the whole concept of the product perceived by the
consumers, it includes various individual perception that together can
create aura that identified and signified the product. The factors that
influence consumers’ view towards the product is the quality of the
wrapper, reputation price, and affectivity of the product.
According to Bennet (2001:289), the benefit of the product not only
come from the core product, but also the packages, product servicing,
warranties and brand. All of this are also contribute on improvement of the
consumers’ perception towards the product. These advantages must be
concerned as the factors that can’t be separated within the consumers’ mind.
E. The Definition of Brand
According to Kotler (Kotler, 2006:256), definition of brand is a name,
term, sign, symbol, or design, or a combination of them, intended to identify
the goods or services of one seller or group of sellers and to differentiate them
from those of competitors. From this definition we can see that brand not only
in the form of a name, but it can also in the form of term, sign, symbol,
design, or a combination of them that it can add dimensions that differentiate
it in some way from other products or services designed to satisfy the same
need. According to Kotler (2006:257), brand has six levels of meanings,
which are:
1) Attribute
Brand is identical with the certain attributes. The world’s strongest
brands share 10 attributes (Kotler, 2006:257), which are:
a) The brand excels at delivering the benefits consumers truly desire.
b) The brand stays relevant.
c) The pricing strategy is based on consumer perceptions of value.
d) The brand is properly positioned.
e) The brand is consistent.
f) The brand portfolio and hierarchy makes sense.
g) The brand makes use of any coordinates a full repertoire1 of
marketing activities to build equity.
h) The brand’s managers understand what the brand means to
consumers.
i) The brand is given proper, sustained report.
j) The company monitors sources of brand equity.
2) Benefit
Brand not only the series of attributes. The consumers doesn’t purchase
the attributes, they purchase the benefit. Attributes needed to be
developed into functional and/or emotional benefit.
1. repertoire (French), means the entire range of skills used in particular field
3) Value
Brand also signifies value. The producer of Mercedes stated that their
product is high performance, safe, high prestige, etc. The brand marketer
has to identify which groups of buyer will purchase those values.
4) Culture
Brand also represents certain cultures. The Mercedes represent Germany
culture, which are: organize, efficient, and high quality.
5) Identity
Brand also represents certain identities. If brand representing a person,
animal, or an object, what would be occurred in our mind? Mercedes
represent logical leader (person), king of lion who likes to order other
animals (animal). Sometimes brand represent the identity of popular
celebrity.
6) The User
Brand can be defined as a kind of consumer that purchase or use that
product. In which it refer to the people that appreciate the values, culture,
and identity of that brand.
1. Power of Brand in Market
The power of brand is within a market (Kotler, 2006:273). There are
five levels of brand power within a market, which are:
a. The brand that is known by the consumer, is a brand that mostly
known by a large number of purchaser within a market.
b. The brand with high level of awareness, is measured by the
acknowledgement memory of the brand.
c. The brand with high acceptance level, is measured by the consumer
who will not refuse to buy the product.
d. The brand with high preference level, is the brand that was chosen
above another brand.
e. The brand with high loyalty level, which is shown by the willingness
of the consumers to find that brand in other places, if they can’t find
the brand in the regular store or market.
Powerful brand is the brand that has high brand equity that was
shown with the higher brand loyalty, awareness of the name, the quality
that is believed in, powerful brand relation and other assets such as,
patents and distribution channel (Kotler, 2006:274).
2. Branding Decision
Nowadays, branding is such a strong force that hardly anything goes
unbranded. When a company decides to brand its products or services, it
must then choose which brand names to use. Four general strategies are
often used (Kotler, 2006:279):
a. Individual names. A major advantage of an individual-names
strategy is that the company does not tie its reputation to the
products. If the product fails or appears to have low quality, the
company’s name or image is not hurt.
b. Blanket family names. A blanket family name also has advantages.
Development cost is less because there is no need for “name”
research or heavy advertising expenditures to create brand-name
recognition. Furthermore, sales of the new product are likely to be
strong if the manufacturer’s name is good.
c. Separate family names for all products. If a company produces quite
different products, it is not desirable to use one blanket family name.
d. Corporate name combined with individual product names. The
company name legitimizes, and the individual name individualizes
the new product.
Furthermore, according to Kotler (Kotler, 2006:281), the qualities
that the brand wants to represent are:
a. It has to represent the criteria that define the benefit of the product.
For example: Frozz, A’Mild, etc.
b. It has to represent the quality definition of the product, like behavior
or color. For example are: Attack, etc.
c. It is important not to have bad meanings or definition of certain
country or language.
3. Branding Strategy
According to Kotler (Kotler, 2006:278), definition of Branding
Strategy is the number of and nature of common and distinctive brand
elements applied to the different products sold by the company. In other
words, devising a branding strategy involves deciding the nature of new
and existing brand elements to be applied to new and existing products.
The decision as to how to brand new products is especially critical.
When a company introduces a new product, it has three main choices
(Kotler, 2006:278):
a. It can develop new brand elements for the new product.
b. It can apply some of its existing brand elements.
c. It can use a combination of new and existing brand elements.
d. When a company uses an established brand to introduce a new
product, it is called Brand Extension, the brand extension can also be
called a sub-brand. An existing brand that gives birth to a brand
extension is referred to the parent brand. If the parent brand is
already associated with multiple products through brand extensions,
then it may also be called a family brand.
F. The Definition of Consumer Behavior
According to Wells (Wells, 2000:5), definition of Consumer Behavior is
the study of individuals and the activities that take place to satisfy their
realized needs. That satisfaction comes from the processes used in selecting,
securing, and using products or services when the benefits received from
those processes meet or exceed consumers’ expectations. In other words,
when an individual realizes that he has a need, the psychological process
starts the consumer decision process. Through this process, the individual sets
out to find ways to fulfill the need he has identified. That process includes the
individual’s thoughts, feelings, and behavior. When the process is complete,
the consumer is faced with the task of analyzing and digesting all the
information, which determines the actions he will take to fulfill the need.
Furthermore, Wells (Wells, 2000:5) also stated that the consumer’s
background characteristics that covered in the consumer behavior are as
follows:
1. Culture, which is the characteristic of certain society that can be
differentiate from other societies.
2. Value, which is the very basic beliefs that the society’s hold about how
the way they think, behave, and feel.
3. Demographic characteristics, which is the physical attributes, social
geography and economy of the consumer that has become part of their
daily activities.
4. Personality, lifestyles, and psychography is the characteristics that
represent the psychology characteristics that influence the individual’s
behavior.
5. Reference groups, which are the people or institutions whose opinions
are valued and to whom a person looks for guidance in his/her own
behavior, values, and conduct, such as family, friends, or celebrities.
The consumer decision-making process consists of five steps (Wells,
2000:8), which are:
1. A consumer becomes aware of a need. This need is triggered either
internally or externally.
2. After the need is identified, the consumer goes through a process to
search for solutions that will fulfill that need. This search involves
identifying criteria that’s important to the consumer. Then the consumer
begins to search for a location where he/she can find the solution.
3. The consumer evaluates the alternatives or options. She takes the
information she collected in Step 2 and processes that information in
order to evaluate her options and arrive at a decision.
4. The consumer makes the purchase based on the information processed in
Step 3. In this step, the consumer determines where to purchase and how
to purchase as well as when she should purchase.
5. The consumer evaluates the purchase. This step focuses on the
psychological response of the buyer regarding the purchase. It’s in this
phase that buyer’s remorse often pops up.
According to Wells (Wells, 2000:45), the process of consumer behavior
is occur from motivation, perception, learning, attitude formation, and
decision making.
1. Motivation
According to Wells (Wells, 2000:227) Motivation is the process by
which an individual recognize a need and takes action to satisfy it. There
are three factors that influence the consumer purposes (Wells, 2000:230),
which are:
a. Background Characteristics, is the background that every human
have in differentiating the brand that will fulfill their needs
b. Available Options, is the choices or options that are available.
c. Marketers and Public Policy, is the factor that can influence
consumer in choosing the consumer purposes.
2. Perception
According to Kurtz (Kurtz, 2008:160) Perception is the meaning that
a person attributes to incoming stimuli gathered through the five senses,
which are, sight, hearing, touch, taste, and smell. Certainly a buyer’s
behavior is influenced by his or her perceptions of a good or a service.
According to Frank H.Alpert and Michael A.Kamins (Alpert and
Kamins, 1995:39), a person’s perception of an object results from the
interaction of five types of factors:
a. The quality of the object.
b. The benefit or usefulness of the object.
c. The five-senses perceived of the object.
d. The promotion attraction of the object.
e. The representation of consumers’ status.
3. Learning
The definition of Learning according to Hawkins (Hawkins,
2002:317) is any change in the content or organization of long-term
memory. This definition doesn’t explain about the cause of the change
and whether this change is fix or not.
The definition of Learning according to Wells (Wells, 2000:28) is
the process by which individuals organize knowledge so that it causes a
permanent change in behavior.
The definition of Learning according to Kurtz (Kurtz, 2008:163) is
the knowledge or skill that is acquired at a result of experience, which
changes consumer behavior. The learning process includes the
component of drive, which is any strong stimulus that impels action.
Fear, pride, desire for money, thirst, pain avoidance, and rivalry are
examples of drives. Learning also relies on a cue, which is any object in
the environment that determines the nature of the consumer’s response to
a drive. Example of cue is a newspaper advertisement for a new
Indonesian Restaurant (a cue for a hungry person).
4. Learning Theories
There are three main categories or philosophical frameworks under
which learning theories fall: behaviorism, cognitivism, and
constructivism (Wells, 2000:28).
a. Behavior Learning Theories
Behaviorism characterize by the investigators that underlying
the assumptions about the process of learning. In essence, three basic
assumptions are held to be true. First, learning is manifested by a
change in behavior. Second, the environment shapes behavior. And
third, the principles of contiguity (how close in time, two events
must be for a bond to be formed) and reinforcement (any means of
increasing the likelihood that an event will be repeated) are central to
explaining the learning process. For behaviorism, learning is the
acquisition of new behavior through conditioning. There are two
types of possible conditioning:
1) Classical conditioning, where the behavior becomes a reflex
response to stimulus.
2) Operant conditioning, where there is reinforcement of the
behavior by a reward or a punishment. Within this framework,
behaviorists are particularly interested in measurable changes in
behavior.
b. Cognitive Learning Theories
Cognitive theories look beyond behavior to explain brain-based
learning. Cognitivists consider how human memory works to
promote learning. For example, the physiological processes of
sorting and encoding information and events into short term memory
and long term memory are important to educators working under the
cognitive theory.
Two key assumptions underlie this cognitive approach:
1) The memory system is an active organized processor of
information, and
2) Prior knowledge plays an important role in learning.
c. Constructive Learning Theories
Constructivism views learning as a process in which the learner
actively constructs or builds new ideas or concepts based upon
current and past knowledge or experience. In other words, "learning
involves constructing one's own knowledge from one's own
experiences." Constructivist learning, therefore, is a very personal
endeavor, whereby internalized concepts, rules, and general
principles may consequently be applied in a practical real-world
context. Aspects of constructivism can be found in self-directed
learning, transformational learning, experiential learning, situated
cognition, and reflective practice.
5. Applying Learning Theories to Marketing Decisions
According to Kurtz (Kurtz, 2008:164), learning theory has some
important implications for marketing strategists, particularly those
involved with consumer packaged goods. Marketers must find a way to
develop a desired outcome such as repeat purchase behavior gradually
over time. Shaping is the process of applying a series of rewards and
reinforcements to permit more complex behavior to evolve.
Both promotional strategy and the product itself play a role in the
shaping process. Some strategies that usually used to influence the
consumer are reward, reception, stimulus generalization and
discrimination, experience, and signs and symbols.
For example, when marketers want to motivate consumers to
become regular buyers of certain merchandise, their first step in getting
consumers to try the product might be to offer a free-sample package that
includes a substantial discount coupon for the next purchase. This
example uses a cue as a shaping procedure.
The second step is to entice the consumer to buy the item with little
financial risk. The discount coupon enclosed with the free sample
prompts this action. Suppose the package that the consumer purchase has
still another, smaller discount coupon enclosed. The satisfactory product
performance and the second coupon provide reinforcement.
The third step is to motivate the person to buy the item again at a
moderate cost. A discount coupon accomplishes this objective, but this
time the purchased package includes no additional coupon. The only
reinforcement comes from satisfactory product performance.
The final step comes when the consumer decides whether to buy the
item at its true price without a discount coupon, Satisfaction with the
product performance provides the only continuing reinforcement.
Therefore, repeat purchase behavior is literally shaped by effective
application of learning theory within a marketing strategy context.
6. Attitude
Perception of incoming stimuli is greatly affected by attitudes. In
fact, a consumer’s decision to purchase an item is strongly based on
his/her attitudes about the product, store, or salesperson.
According to Kurts (Kurtz, 2008:162), attitudes are a person’s
enduring favorable or unfavorable evaluations, emotions, or action
tendencies toward some object or idea. Because favorable attitudes likely
affect brand preferences, marketers are interested in determining the
consumer attitudes toward their offerings.
According to Frank H. Alpert and Michael A. Kamins (Alpert and
Kamins, 1995:40), an attitude has three multiattribute components, which
are:
a. Actual purchase behavior.
b. Consumers’ consumption.
c. Loyalty of product.
7. Decision Making
According to Wells (Wells, 2000:343), the decision making can be
defined as the behavioral process that an individual use to choose certain
product or service that they want to consume.
Consumer Background Characteristics and Behavioral Process that
has already explained above can influence the Consumer Purchasing
Activities. According to Wells (Wells, 2000:37), the consumer purchase
activities can be categorized into seven steps, which are:
a. Need recognition, is happen when consumer know and/or recognize
his/her needs.
b. Search for alternatives, is happen when consumer consider several
available choices that can fulfill his/her needs.
c. Evaluation of alternatives, is happen when consumer consider those
available choices and decide which one is best to fulfill his/her
needs.
d. Purchase and use of products, is happen when consumer make a
decision to purchase certain product and consume it.
e. Evaluation of consumption experience, is happen when consumer
evaluate his/her experience when he/she consume the product, in
which whether the product can fulfill his/her needs or not.
f. Feedback, is the information responsive feedback that the consumer
give about the product that he/she consume to his/her families,
friends, and/or the society environment.
g. End of consumption process, is happen when the consumer stop to
purchase and consume certain product.
Picture 2.1
The Influence of Consumer Background Characteristics and Behavioral Process
Towards Consumer Purchase Activities
Behavioral Process
Consumer Background
Characteristics
Demographic
Personality
Psycography
Lifestyle
Culture
Values
Reference
Group
Consumer Purchase Activities
Need Recognition
Search for
Alternatives
Evaluation for Alternatives
Purchase and
Use of Products
Evaluation of Consumption Experience
Feedback
End of
Consumption Process
(Wells, 2000:45)
M O T I V A T I O N
P E R C E P T I O N
A F T O T R I M T A U T D I E O N
D M E A C K I I
S N I G
O N
D. Theoretical Framework
According to Alpert (Alpert, 1995:38), the pioneer brand define as the
very first brand of a new type of product which comes to market while the
follower brand is all brand of the same type of product that enter the market
after the pioneer brand.
According to Alpert (Alpert, 1995:36), the relationship between status of
pioneer and follower brand with perception is because the pioneer brand is
the subject’s first experience with the product, it frames a subject’s
perceptions of the product category and becomes the category prototype.
While the relations between the relationship between status of pioneer
and follower brand with consumers’ attitude is the consumers find themselves
to have a positive attitude toward pioneer brands in general, which partially
explained by the favorable perception of pioneer brands.
Behavioral Process
Perception (X1) Attitude (X2)
Perception and Attitude towards Pioneer and
Follower Brands
Multiple Linear Regressions
Conclusions and Implications
E. Hypotheses
The hypotheses of this research are:
1.
2.
H01:
HA1:
H02:
HA2:
Consumers’ perception has a positive relations and positive influence
towards Sampoerna A’Mild as pioneer brand and Star Mild as
follower brand matter.
Consumers’ perception doesn’t have any relations and influence
towards Sampoerna A’Mild as pioneer brand and Star Mild as
follower brand matter.
Consumers’ attitude has a positive relations and positive influence
towards Sampoerna A’Mild as pioneer brand and Star Mild as
follower brand matter.
Consumers’ attitude doesn’t have any relations and influence towards
Sampoerna A’Mild as pioneer brand and Star Mild as follower brand
matter.
CHAPTER III
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
A. Research Scope
In this research, research is done by collecting primary data using
questionnaires and secondary data coming from literature bibliography and
internet. This secondary data applied as input for questionnaire material can
be confirmed as relevant questionnaire in order to know the consumers’
perception and consumers’ attitude towards the pioneer brand and follower
brand issue within the cigarettes market in West Jakarta.
B. Sampling Method
Considering the limitations of time, the writer used the judgement
sampling technique, that is the electing of sample of research randomly that
this information was received by using certain consideration in West Jakarta
that was chosen by the writer. The number of samples is 100 peoples, because
quite represent the number of populations and the level of the error in the
questionnaire is lower (Dr. Sugiyono:2005).
C. Data Collection Method
The writer in used several methods that were taken from the location of
the research. According to Prof.Dr. Suaharsimi Arikunto (2000:134)
“Technique data processing was methods that could be used by the researcher
to gather the data.” According to Sugiyono (2005:139) when considering the
source of the data, then the data collection could be divided into primary and
secondary source. The primary source was the data that directly gave the data
to the collector of the data, and the source secondary was the source that
indirectly gave the data to the collector of the data, like through the other
person or the document. Whereas for the type of the data that is use in this
research in collecting the data is by using the primary data and the secondary
data:
1. Primary Data
The primary data is the research data that was received directly from
the original source (did not go through the intermediary’s media). The
primary data is specially gathered by the researcher to answer the
research question with the survey method using questionnaire (Rahmat
Kriyantono, 2008:95).
The primary data collection is carried out through the sending
questionnaire to the respondent, by means of visiting directly the
respondent from the research location.
Questionnaire contained the questions that were drafted in such a
way, and were aimed at the respondents to give the answer that regarding
the perception and attitude toward Sampoerna A’Mild as pioneer brand
and Star Mild as follower brand in cigarettes industry within West
Jakarta market. Contact method that will be undertaken is by direct
interview with the respondents involved. The samples that will be
interviewed are 100 peoples with education minimum High School
(SMU). The amount of sample taken is 100 peoples because in order to
make this research to be an accurate research. According to Sekaran
(Sekaran, 2003:266), the minimum sample to be used in correlative
research is 30 subjects. The basic of sampling taken is that in order to
make an accurate and right result, than the respondents have to have
minimum adequate educational level.
Therefore, the sampling method that undertaken in this research is
purposive technique, which means by choosing sample from certain
population because they have adequate qualities to be put in the research.
The research will be conducted in West Jakarta area. Samples are
purposive, which means the sample is taken in purpose (non-random)
because the characteristics of the sample are known Sekaran (Sekaran,
2003:266). The sample that will be taken is the sample with minimum
educational level of High School (SMU). The reason is because in this
research, the sample has to understand what is the meaning and what
question will be ask in the questionnaire clearly so that it can minimize
the error in the research conducted.
2. Secondary data
Secondary data will be taken by searching the information in the
library and internet, the researcher performed literature study or library
research to ensure that no important variable that has in the past been
found repeatedly to have had an impact on the problem is ignored.
Literature study is the documentation of a comprehensive review of the
published and unpublished work from secondary sourced of data in the
areas of specific interest to the researcher. Various activities which
researcher does in process of this literature study in the first place is read,
studies and comprehends a number of journals, books, documents, and
material and references which required by the research. This Literature
study also is done by the way of browsing some internet sites related to
this research.
D. Data Analysis Method
1. Descriptive Analysis
The writer gives questionnaire to the respondent to answer those
questions. The question being used is closed-ended question, where
answer allotted in the form of likert scale for every question. Respondent
only choose one of answer which has been provided.
Questionnaire analysis is done by giving value from every answer to
question of questionnaire based on likert scale method, according to
Rosady Ruslan (2008:62):
Strongly agree : value weight 5
Agree : value weight 4
Not sure (neither agree nor disagree) : value weight 3
Disagree : value weight 2
Strongly disagree : value weight 1
Then result of the questionnaire is compiled into form of table which
will be tabulated and the result is presented into form of table is
comprising frequency and percentage respondent opinion.
To examine validity and reliability of the each and every item of the
questionnaires, therefore the writer need to do a test on validity and
reliability first in order to get the good research result try out and must be
done towards several respondents first.
a. Validity Test
The validity test was the testing that used to measure legal or
valid or not from some questionnaire. Some questionnaire was said
valid if the question in questionnaire was able to reveal something
that will be measured by that questionnaire (Ghozali, 2006)
The validity test was carried out with compared r counted (the
table of Corrected Item-Total Correlation) with r the table (the
Product Moment table with the significance 5%) to degree of
freedom (df) = n- 2, in this case n was the number sample the
research totaling n the respondent that had r counted for the value
df=n-2, and some questionnaires was said valid if r counted > r the
table (Ghozali, 2006).
b. Reliability Test
The reliability test was the testing that was carried out to
measure some questionnaire that was the indicator of the variable or
construct. Some questionnaire was said reliable or competent if the
answer is consistent or stable from time to time, and a variable was
said reliable if giving the Cronbach Alpha value > 0.60
(Ghozali,2006).
To test construct reliability in this research will be using
technique cronbach's alpha test.
r = K { 1- ∑σb }
(K-1) σt
Where:
r = Reliability
K = Number of questionnaire
σb = Item variance
σt = Total variance
A certain instrument can be called rely (reliable), if has
coefficient above 0,6 (Yarnest, 2004:68). In Sugiyono (2005), the
score of reliability is differentiating on each of every variable to
interpret low or high of the reliability instrument, as directive is base
on certainty as follows:
Table 3.1
Category High and Low Reliability Instrument
Interval Coefficient Level of Reliability
and Star Mild as follower brand (Y). A multiple regression model was
said linear if filling the condition linearity, like normality the data (both
in a manner the individual and the model) and free from the classic
assumption statistic.
The double linear formula
Explanation
Ŷ = The subject in variable dependent that predictable
a = Price Y if X = 0 (Price constant)
b = The direction figure or the regression coefficient that showed the
increase figure or the decline dependent variable that is based in
independent variable. When b (+) then rise, and when b (-) then
it is going down.
X1 = Consumers’ perception
X2 = Consumers’ attitude
ei = Error term or disturbance
a. The Testing of the Hypothesis from Correlation
The hypothetical test that is used in this research is by using the
analysis of the correlation that is to know how the relations of the
consumers’ perception, consumers’ attitude and Sampoerna A’Mild
Ŷ = a + b1X1 + b2X2 + ei
as pioneer brand and Star Mild as follower brand, that was
formulated as follows:
r = n∑XY - ∑X. ∑Y
√n ∑X2 – (∑X)2 . (n∑Y2) – (∑Y)2
Explanation:
r = Correlation coefficient
n = The number of respondents
X = consumers’ perception and consumers’ attitude
Y = Sampoerna A’Mild as pioneer brand and Star Mild as
follower brand
The rise or the decline from the value x and y is determined by
the existence of linear relations between two variable that did not
affect each other both directly or indirectly, in fact relations could
happen was very weak or did not have linear relations.
By being known that:
r = 0 meant relations x and y did not have the correlation, available
relations really weak.
r = 1 or approached 1, meaning available relations very strong
(strong perfect)
r = Positive, meaning the appreciation x will be followed by the rise
y, and on the other hand the decline thought x will be followed
by the decline y
r = Negative, meaning the appreciation x will be followed by the
decline thought y, and on the other hand the decline thought x
will be followed by the appreciation y.
b. F Test and t Test
To carry out the testing of the hypothesis, then the several
provisions that must be paid attention to is formulating the
hypothesis of zero (Ho), we also must accompany with the
hypothesis alternative (Ha), like as follows:
Ho: ßi = 0 Is not gotten by the influence that was significant
between variable X and variable X with variable Y.
Ha: ßi ≠ 0 Gotten by the influence that was significant between
variable X and variable X with variable Y.
The simultaneous test with this F test aimed at knowing the
influence together variable independent against variable dependent.
With the formula:
F Test = ß / k
(1-R2) / (n-k-1)
If F test > F table, then H0 was refused and Ha was accepted.
Meaning that variable independent simultaneously had the influence that
was significant against variable dependent.
If F test < F table Then Ho was received and Ha was refused, meaning
that variable independent simultaneously did not have the influence that
was significant against variable dependent.
Whereas to know their respective influence size variable independent
individually (partial) against variable dependent then was carried out with
the T Test with the formula:
t test = b – Se
Sb
Sb = Se
√∑Y2 – [∑X]2
n
Se = √∑Y2 - a∑Y - b∑XY
(n-2)
Whereas:
a = Constants
b = Coefficient correlation
n = the amount of sample
Sb = the standard error of correlation coefficient
Se = the standard error of the estimation
If t test > t table, then Ho was refused and Ha was accepted,
meaning that variable independent partially had the influence that
was significant against variable dependent.
If t test < t table, then Ho was received and Ha was refused,
meaning that variable independent partially did not have the
influence that was significant against variable dependent.
This analysis also gave information about the determination
coefficient (R2) that is to know the big capacity variable independent
explained variable independent explained variable dependent by
seeing R Square and Adjusted R Square that have been matched with
the number variable independent that was used in the research. The
R Square value (R2) was said good if above 0.5 because of the R
Square value revolved between 0 to 1.
3. The Classic Assumption test Multiple Regression
The linear regression model multiplied could be acknowledged as the
good model if this model filled the assumption normality the data and
freest from the classic assumption statistic, good that autocorrelation,
multicollinearity and heteroskesdastisity.
a. Autocorrelation
Autocorrelation is relations that happened between the members
from a set of observation that was compiled in the series of time that
regarding restrained time that could be interpreted that, correlation
relations from each one variable time now is the same his situation in
the period that will come. One of the testing that was used to know
autocorrelation was with the Durbin Watson Test. The Durbin
Watson Test formula is as follows:
d = ∑( e n – e n-1) ∑ e2 n
Hypothesis:
Ho : there is no correlation
Ha : there is autocorrelation positive/negative
Criteria the testing:
Ho accepted if the Dw value around the figure -2
b. Multicollinearity
The test multicollinearity was needed to know was not variable
independent that had the resemblance with variable independent
other in one model. The resemblance between variable independent
in a model will cause the occurrence of the correlation that was very
strong between variable independent with variable independent that
was other. Moreover, the detection against multicollinearity also
aimed at avoiding the habit in the process of the taking of the
conclusion concerning the influence of the partial test respectively
variable independent against variable dependent.
The detection multicollinearity to a model could be seen from
several matters:
1) If the result Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) not more than 10
and the Tolerance value not less than 0.1, then the model could
be it was said freest from multicollinearity VIF = 1 / Tolerance,
if VIF = 10 then Tolerance = 1/10 = 0.1. It was increasingly
high that VIF then increasingly low Tolerance.
2) If the value of the correlation coefficient between each one
variable independent less than 0.70, then the model could be
stated free from the classic assumption multicollinearity.
3) If thought coefficient the determinant (R-Square) on 0.60 but
was not variable independent that was influential against
variable dependent, then the model was affected
multicollinearity.
c. Heteroskesdastisity
Heterokedastisity tested the occurrence of the difference
variance residual a period of observation to the period of other
observation, or the picture of relations between the value that was
predicted and Studentized Delete Residual this value. The regression
model that had the equality variance residual a period of observation
with the period of other observation, or the existence of relations
befween the value that was predicted and Studentized Delete
Residual this value so as to be able to be said this model
homokedastisity.
Heterokedastisity showed that the variation variable not be the
same for all observation. In heterokedastisity the mistake that was
systematic in accordance with the size of one or more variable.
To know there is or there is not heterokedastisity, the writer had
several methods, which are:
1) See the plot graph between the value of the prediction variable
dependent (ZPRED) and residual him (SRESID). The detection
there was or not heterokedastisity could be carried out with
looking there was or not the certain pattern to the graph
scatterplot between SRESID and ZPRED where the Y fuse was
Y was predicted and the X fuse was residual (Y the prediction of
- Y actually).
2) Analysis basis, if having the certain pattern like the plots that
formed the pattern that was arranged (waved, widened,
afterwards narrowed), then indicated heterokedastisity. If not
having the clear pattern in a manner the plots spread above and
under the point origin to the Y fuse, then did not happen
Heterokedastisity
E. Operational Variable
Variable in this research consist of:
1. Independent Variable
Variable this often was mentioned as variable the stimulus, predictor,
and antecedent. In Indonesian often was mentioned as free variable.
Independent variable was variable that influenced or that to because of
his change or the emergence dependent variable (was tied). In this
research that consider as independent variable independent Consumers’
Perception (X1) and Consumers’ Attitude (X2).
2. Dependent Variable
This variable was mentioned as variable output, criteria, consistent.
In this research, the dependent variable is Sampoerna A’Mild as pioneer
brand and Star Mild as follower brand (Y).
Table 3.2
Operational Variable Analysis
No Variable Sub variable Indicator Scale
1 Consumers’
Perception (X1)
Sources:
“Principles of
Contemporary
Marketing” book
by David L. Krutz
pg. 160-161; and
“An Empirical
Investigation of
Consumer
Memory, Attitude,
and Perceptions
Toward Pioneer
and Follower
Brands” Journal
by Frank H. Alpert
and Michael A.
Kamins
Quality
The quality of
consumer’s product
Ordinal
Usefulness
The usefulness of
consumer’s product
Ordinal
Taste
The taste of consumer’s
product
Ordinal
Advertisement
Attraction
The familiarity degree
of product in
consumer’s mind
Ordinal
Package
The degree of
packaging attraction in
consumer’s mind
Ordinal
Symbolization
Status
The degree of
symbolization status
Ordinal
2 Consumers’
Attitude (X2)
Sources:
“Principles of
Contemporary
Marketing” book
by David L. Krutz
pg. 162-163; and
“An Empirical
Investigation of
Consumer
Memory, Attitude,
and Perceptions
Toward Pioneer
and Follower
Brands” Journal
by Frank H. Alpert
and Michael A.
Kamins
Purchasing
behavior
1. The suggestion
reason from other
consumers
2. The excitement of
advertisement
Ordinal
Consumption
of the
Product
1. The numbers of
consuming the
product in a day
2. The numbers of
consuming the
product in a month
Ordinal
Consumer’s
Loyalty
The loyalty of
consuming the product
Ordinal
No Variable Sub variable Indicator Scale
3 The Status of
Pioneer and
Follower between
Brands
Source:
“An Empirical
Investigation of
Consumer
Memory, Attitude,
and Perceptions
Toward Pioneer
and Follower
Brands” Journal
by Frank H. Alpert
and Michael A.
Kamins
Importance The importance of
status between pioneers
and follower brands in
consumer’s mind
Ordinal
Favorable
Perceptions
The degree of favorable
perceptions towards the
product
Ordinal
Consumer’s
Preference
The preference of
consuming the product
between pioneer and
follower brands
Ordinal
CHAPTER IV
FINDING AND RESULT
F. Companies Background
3. Philip Morris & Co., Ltd., Inc.
The Philip Morris&Co.,Ltd. Inc. was firstly build in 1847 as a single
shop on London’s Bond Street, selling tobacco and ready-made
cigarettes. During Mr. Morris’s death, the business was taken over by his
wife Margaret and his brother Leopold and in 1881 the Company went
public, Leopold Morris joining Joseph Grunebaum to establish Philip
Morris & Company and Grunebaum, Ltd. This partnership was dissolved
in 1885 and the Company became known as Philip Morris & Co., Ltd.
In 1919 was a crucial year for the Company. It saw the introduction
of the Philip Morris coronet logo, the acquisition of the Philip Morris
Company in the U.S. by a new firm owned by American stockholders,
and its incorporation in Virginia under the name of Philip Morris & Co.,
Ltd., Inc. By the end of the next decade, the Company had begun to
manufacture cigarettes in its factory in Richmond, Virginia; in 1924,
what was to become its most famous brand, Marlboro, was introduced.
By the mid-1950s the Company had become a part of American
culture, and soon after it launched Philip Morris International to
manufacture and market its products around the world.
In 2005, Philip Morris & Co., Ltd., Inc. acquires PT. HM Sampoerna
Tbk in Indonesia with the price of Rp. 10,600,- per share and after the
acquisition takes place, the company gain a rapid growth performance
during 2005-2009, as follows:
Table 4.1.
Table Performance of Philip Morris & Co., Ltd., Inc.
Year
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
Net Revenues ($Mill)
62,080
63,640
55,243
48,260
45,288
Operating Income ($Mill)
10,040
10,248
8,894
8,368
7,735
Cigarette Volume (Units in
Billions)
864
869
848
831
804
Source: http://www.pmi.com
4. Bentoel Group
The history of Bentoel Group began when Ong Hok Liong
established cigarettes home-factory named “Strootjes Fabriek Ong Hok
Liong” in 1930. The home-factory based then change its name to N.V
Pertjetakan Hien An in 1951. Four years later will be known as PT
Perusahaan Rokok Tjap Bentoel.
During 1970s-1980s, Bentoel had rapid growth performance and
became one of the key player in cigarettes industry in Indonesia. In June
17, 2009, BAT International in which centered in London acquired
Bentoel and merge the BAT Indonesia and Bentoel Group as one entity
in Indonesia and in January 1, 2010, Bentoel Group finally licensed as
the member of British American Tobacco International.
G. General Illustration of Research Object
1. Location and Time of the Research
Considering the limitations of time, the writer used the judgement
sampling technique, that is the electing of sample of research randomly
that this information was received by using certain consideration in West
Jakarta that was chosen by the writer. The number of samples is 100
peoples, because quite represent the number of populations and the level
of the error in the questionnaire is lower (Dr. Sugiyono:2005).
The distribution of questionnaires are scattered within 8 Sub-districts
in West Jakarta. The following is the distribution of questionnaires:
Table 4.2.
Distribution of Questionnaires
Cengkareng 13 questionnaires
Grogol Petamburan 13 questionnaires
Taman Sari 13 questionnaires
Tambora 13 questionnaires
Kebon Jeruk 12 questionnaires
Kali Deres 12 questionnaires
Palmerah 12 questionnaires
Kembangan 12 questionnaires
2. Characteristics of Respondents
Questionnaires that have already distributed are 100 questionnaires
to all 100 respondents. All 100 questionnaires given have all been
returned and responded appropriately.
As shown in the table 4.3. below stated the characteristics of
respondents from Gender, Age, Occupation, Income per month, and the
cigarettes that they usually consume between Sampoerna A’Mild and
Star Mild.
Table 4.3.
Characteristics of the Respondents
No. Information Total
1
Gender
Male 80
Female 20
2
Age
17 – 24 years old 20
25 – 35 years old 39
36 – 50 years old 21
51 years old – above 20
3
Occupation
Highschool and University Student 20
Entrepreneur 18
Office Employee 24
Government Employee 37
Other 1
4
Income per Month
Less than Rp. 1,000,000.- 20
Rp. 1,000,000 - Rp. 4,000,000.- 59
More than Rp. 4,000,000.- 21
5
Consumption of Cigarettes
Sampoerna A’ Mild 81
Star Mild 19
Source : Primary Data
As shown on the Table 4.3. above, firstly, from the gender
classification consist of 80 males and 20 females. Secondly, from age
classification consist of 20 respondents in between 17 – 24 years old, 39
respondents in between 25 - 35 years old, 21 respondents in between 36 –
50 years old, and 20 respondent that are more than 51 years old. Thirdly,
from occupation classification consist of 20 respondents are Highschool
and University students, 18 respondents are Entrepreneurs, 24
respondents are Office Employees, 37 respondents are Government
Employees, and only 1 respondent that is uncategorized. Fourthly, from
the respondents income per month’s classification consist of 20
respondents that have income less than Rp. 1,000,000.-, 59 respondents
that have income between Rp. 1,000,000 – Rp. 4,000,000.-, and 21
respondents that have income more than Rp. 4,000,000.-. And lastly,
from the respondents’ choice of cigarettes consumption consist of 81
respondents choose to consume Sampoerna A’ Mild and 19 respondents
choose to consume Star Mild. All these interpretations will give us an
introductional picture about the consumers’ perception and consumers’
attitude towards Sampoerna A’Mild as pioneer brand and Star Mild as
follower brand.
Table 4.4.
Tryout Results of Consumers’ Perceptions and Consumers’ Attitude Towards
Sampoerna A’mild As Pioneer Brand And Star Mild As Follower Brand
In West Jakarta
Variable Question Corrected Item-Total Correlation
Pearson Correlation
Cronbach α if Item Deleted
Desc.
Consumer Perception
(X1)
1 0.597 0.351 0.920 Valid 2 0.467 0.351 0.921 Valid 3 0.584 0.351 0.920 Valid 4 0.456 0.351 0.922 Valid 5 0.419 0.351 0.922 Valid 6 0.478 0.351 0.921 Valid 7 0.740 0.351 0.918 Valid 8 0.393 0.351 0.923 Valid 9 0.383 0.351 0.923 Valid
10 0.647 0.351 0.919 Valid 11 0.535 0.351 0.920 Valid 12 0.523 0.351 0.921 Valid
Consumer Attitude
(X2)
1 0.597 0.351 0.920 Valid 2 0.467 0.351 0.921 Valid 3 0.584 0.351 0.920 Valid 4 0.456 0.351 0.922 Valid 5 0.419 0.351 0.922 Valid 6 0.478 0.351 0.921 Valid 7 0.740 0.351 0.918 Valid 8 0.393 0.351 0.923 Valid 9 0.383 0.351 0.923 Valid
10 0.647 0.351 0.919 Valid
Sampoerna A’Mild as
Pioneer Brand and
Star Mild as Follower Brand (Y)
1 0.740 0.351 0.918 Valid 2 0.647 0.351 0.919 Valid 3 0.740 0.351 0.918 Valid 4 0.585 0.351 0.920 Valid 5 0.688 0.351 0.918 Valid
H. Finding and Result
From the table 4.4. shows that all of questions are valid and reliable. This
is provided by there are no negative correlations on the score of the questions.
The pretests have been distributed to 30 respondents. So the questions are
qualified and could be used in the research conducted.
1. Validity Test
Validity test is aimed to measure a questionnaire in order to obtain
the right and accurate questions. The questionnaire is valid while could
be responses to measure (Ghozali, 2006). Requirement of validity is, if
the r counted > r table.
2. Reliability Test
Reliability test is aimed to know the consistency of questionnaire.
From the table 4.5. the score for Cronbach’s Alpha is 0.923. Certain
instruments could be said as reliable if gain coefficient above 0.60,
therefore can be summarize the alpha result from all questionnaires is
very high. This shows that the whole items of questionnaires could be use
for further research and if the same question is distributed, the answer to
it will not be far differed with the previous answers.
Table 4.5.
Tryout Results of Consumers’ Perceptions And Consumers’ Attitude
Cronbach’s Alpha Cronbach’s Alpha
Based on Standard Items N of Items
0.923 0.929 27
Source: Primary Data
3. Descriptive Analysis
The data that is ready for processing will be continued by using
SPSS 16.0 version. The question at second section is using nominal scale
and the other question is measure by likert scale that use 1-5
measurement number, where 1 is representing “strongly disagree” and 5
is representing “strongly agree”.
a. Sampoerna A’Mild as Pioneer Brand and Star Mild as Follower
Brand Variable
Table 4.6.
The Importance of Status Between Pioneer Brands and Follower
Brands in Consumers’ Mind
Evaluation Frequency Percentage
Strongly Agree 40 40%
Agree 37 37%
Neutral 10 10%
Disagree 7 7%
Strongly Disagree 6 6%
Total 100 100%
The table 4.6. shown the importance of status between pioneer
brands and follower brands in consumers’ mind within West Jakarta
market and the results indicate that most of consumers in West
Jakarta have a strong agreement that the status of Pioneer Brands and
Follower Brands of Sampoerna A’Mild and Star Mild is really
important. It represents in the table 4.6. above that 40% of total
respondents have strongly agree opinion, 37% of total respondents
have agree opinion, 10% of total respondents have neutral opinion,
7% of total respondents have disagree opinion, and 6% of total
respondents have strongly disagree opinion.
Table 4.7.
The Degree of Favorable Perceptions Between Sampoerna A’Mild as
Pioneer Brands and Follower Brands in Consumer’s Mind
Positive image of Sampoerna A’Mild as pioneer brands perceived
in consumer’s mind
Evaluation Frequency Percentage
Strongly Agree 47 47%
Agree 30 30%
Neutral 13 13%
Disagree 6 6%
Strongly Disagree 4 4%