Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Construction Production 2.0
Pat Geary
Chief Operating Officer
Story Construction Co.
Agenda
• Introduction
• The “Why” and Vision of Construction Production 2.0 (CP2.0)
• What is CP2.0?
• Planning & Scheduling Realities In Construction
• CP2.0 Project Culture
• Daily Crew Production Flow & System Requirements
• Closing
2
Story Construction Co.
• Ames, Iowa based Commercial & Industrial Contractor
serving all of Iowa with revenue of $75 - $80M per year.
• Employs nearly 150 people and self-performs concrete,
precast &steel erection, rough & finish carpentry and process
pipe & equipment.
• Markets served include: Office, Warehouse, Lab, K-12
Schools, Higher Education, Church, Senior Living,
Renewable Fuels, Meat Processing and Water & Wastewater
Treatment.
Story Construction Co.
• In July of 2013, we decided to significantly modify the
methods we used to plan and schedule our projects and
Construction Production 2.0 (CP2.0) was the system we
choose to employ to accomplish that goal.
• CP2.0 is grounded in many lean principals to include some
similarities to Lean Last Planner, however, CP2.0 expands on
lean to include focus on the project culture and team member
growth and development.
• The company wide transition to CP2.0 took 18 months and
now all projects, no matter type, size, location, delivery
method, etc. use CP2.0 as the planning and schedule
system.
• Video No. 1
CP2.0 “Why” Production Vision
“What”Every Crew on every
Story project
continuously
executes its
assigned work
flawlessly to meet its
daily production
target without
incident or defect.
• Video No. 2
CP2.0 is…
• Story’s answer to the following:
– Retiring boomers
– Shrinking labor supply
– Continued decline in productivity
– Accelerating the growth and development of our staff
• A Journey, not a happening
• Continuous Improvement…Embrace the Variances
• Compliance to Commitment… Creating Strong Teams in
Supportive Cultures
CP2.0 – System Principles
• The components were designed to promote teamwork.
• The experience for all participants should be the same on all
Story projects.
• The process should:
– Incrementally increase level of detail of planning and
understanding of the work
– Filter bad information and poor planning from getting to the
workface.
• All the participants to have fun while predictably and reliably
getting the work done.
CP2.0 is not…
• A magic bullet
• A happening or instantaneous change
• Effortless
• Creating more work for project teams
CP2.0 is a framework for success that will yield the results
based on the effort invested.
Principals impacting Industry Production
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 20 40 60 80 100
Series1
Perc
ent
of
Pro
duct
Com
ple
te
Percent of Scheduled Time to Complete
Student
Syndrome
Parkinson’s Law
Murphey’s Law
Multi-Tasking
Industry Scheduling/Planning Reality
• Work at the crew level is hostage to the manner in which
work is supplied by the upstream Pre-Construction & Project
Management activities.
• Project Schedules are based on Early Start of activities to
protect against highly variable supply of production inputs
and production rates – the effect is, our industry is very good
at starting activities and not very good at completing
activities.
Industry Scheduling/Planning Reality
• Research conducted by the Lean Construction Institute
(www.leanconstruction.org), specifically by the founders
Glenn Ballard and Greg Howell, “found that in conventionally
managed construction, a realization rate of 50 – 60% is
typically found for weekly tasks”, as published in “The
underlying theory of project management is obsolete” (2002).
• The research found that only 50 – 60 percent of the tasks
planned to be completed this week were actually completed
this week. Prior to CP2.0, Story was most likely not any
better.
Principals of CP2.0
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 20 40 60 80 100
Series1
Perc
ent
of
Pro
duct
Com
ple
te
Percent of Scheduled Time to Complete
New Pace/Goals &
Planned Completion Date
SetCollaboratively Planned Daily
Production Goals, Rate, Pace
Buffer
As Late As
Possible and
Reliable
Story’s Scheduling/Planning Reality
• Work of the upstream Pre-Construction & Project Management activities will be done as dictated by the flow of work at the crew level.
• Project Schedules will be based on Late Finish of activities .
• We will plan & execute the work on our projects to achieve consistent, predictable daily crew production flow.
• Since Jan. of 2014, Story Projects using CP2.0 have completed 78.74% (75,907 of 96,401) of their daily crew production goals when planned as planned.
Projects that “feel right” have these
traitsAbout 2 ½ years after starting our work with CP2.0 we discovered the projects with the highest PPC “felt right”, so we spent time defining “felt right”.
Development Behavior Culture
Educate Accountable Respect
Coach Selflessness Trust
Evaluate ConfidentCollaboration
Experiential Learning thru Anticipatory Teamwork
guided experimentation Enthusiastic “The way we do it”
Incremental Conformance Engaged
What we learned is the right culture drives great results when given the proper process to execute.
Conduct Experimentsto get there
Grasp the Current
Condition
Establish your Next
TargetCondition
Get the Direction orChallenge
1
2
3
4
The Four Basic Steps of the Improvement Kata
www.katatogrow.com
A Kata is a routine you practice, so it’s
pattern becomes an automatic habit that
gives you new skills.
Kata
• The “Improvement Kata” is a scientific routine for achieving
tough goals.
• The daily pattern consists of:
– Plan
– Do
– Check
– Reflect
• YouTube Video: “Rother – Improvement Kata Mind Set”
Daily Crew Production Flow
• Two critical objectives every day for each and
every crew on the project:
1. A high quality crew work assignment and
production goal that is understood and
committed to by the crew.
2. A high quality work area in which the work can
be completed without interruption or
disruption.
• What is Quality?
– Conformance to a set of requirements.
– Is this a quality meeting?
Meeting Requirements
Be on time
Be prepared
Turn-off phones & radios
One person speaks at a time
No Side Conversations
Table small group topics for
discussion until after this
meeting
Be honest
Be brief, get to the point
SHOULD Filter
• Screens work being pulled from Phased Pull Production
Schedule onto the Look Ahead Production Schedule.
• Result: Only the work that meets the requirements of
SHOULD filter passes to the left.
• Only work that SHOULD happen passes.
• Not work that is simply able to pass.
MakeCertain! Tasks
• Support task or activity:
– Associated with work activities scheduled to
complete over the next 2 weeks.
– Examples:
• Prerequisite work/activities, inspections, survey
• Special site preparations
• Supply of the six elements
– Manpower | Materials | Tools | Information | Environment |
Equipment
– They must be complete before work CAN be accomplished.
• Projects with the highest number of MakeCertain! Tasks
consistently produce higher PPC results.
CAN Filter
• Screens work being pulled from One-week Look Ahead
Production Schedule onto Next Week’s Production Plan.
• Only the work that meets the requirements of the CAN Filter
passes to the left.
• Simply put, only work that CAN be done – when planned, as
planned – passes the CAN Filter.
• Not work that we hope will happen.
This Week’s Work• Post-It Note
Requirements
– All notes must be filled
out completely.
– Quality of notes directly
impacts level of
predictability and
reliability of each day’s
work.
• Video No. 3
Basic Meetings• Project Expectations Meeting (typically 90 minutes)
– Discuss expectations of the project participants.
– Commit to the collaborative project approach.
• Weekly Information Meetings (1 hour or less)– Review status of information with A/E, Owner & major Subcontractors.
• Weekly Production Team Meeting (1 hour or less for Foreman)– Review future project schedule (2-6 weeks out).
– Each foreman present next week’s work to the group.
– Confirm next week’s scheduled work meets CAN Filter requirements.
• Daily End of Shift Meeting (15 minutes or less for Foreman) – Report status of today’s planned work.
– Discuss tomorrow’s work plan.
• Daily Toolbox & Tailgate Meetings (15 minutes or less for crews)– Meetings to start and finish to work of the crew each day.
Planned Percent Complete (PPC)
1 Weather
2 Pre-requisite work incomplete
3 Congestion or crew conflicts
4 Manpower (- for shortage + for extra)
5 Equipment or tool failure
6 Lack of materials
7 Lack of information
8 Wrong information or plan bust
9 Change of priority
10 Completed task early
(and NOT because of another reason above)
Totals 75907 96401 78.74% 2679 2380 541 3337 60 217 1270 512 1980 4683 2603 Varanice Totals
2.8% 2.5% 0.6% 3.5% 0.1% 0.2% 1.3% 0.5% 2.1% 4.9% 2.7% Percent of All Activities
13.1% 11.6% 2.6% 16.3% 0.3% 1.1% 6.2% 2.5% 9.7% 22.9% 12.7% Percent of Variance
CompletedScheduled Percent 1 2 3 4- 4+ 5 6 7 8 9 10 Notes
2014 6837 9307 73.46% 400 236 109 303 8 28 170 47 206 605 337
4.3% 2.5% 1.2% 3.3% 0.1% 0.3% 1.8% 0.5% 2.2% 6.5% 3.6% Percent of Total
2015 17327 22602 76.66% 681 710 122 746 25 56 314 105 551 1148 714
3.0% 3.1% 0.5% 3.3% 0.1% 0.2% 1.4% 0.5% 2.4% 5.1% 3.2% Percent of Total
2016 18092 23007 78.64% 588 731 152 950 3 40 324 176 417 1094 416
2.6% 3.2% 0.7% 4.1% 0.0% 0.2% 1.4% 0.8% 1.8% 4.8% 1.8% Percent of Total
2017 19553 23705 82.48% 394 363 112 661 17 39 302 122 383 1058 635
1.7% 1.5% 0.5% 2.8% 0.1% 0.2% 1.3% 0.5% 1.6% 4.5% 2.7% Percent of Total
2018 14098 17780 79.29% 616 340 46 677 7 54 160 62 423 778 501
3.5% 1.9% 0.3% 3.8% 0.0% 0.3% 0.9% 0.3% 2.4% 4.4% 2.8% Percent of Total
Activities Variances
Variance Reasons
ALL PROJECTS - BY YEAR
CP2.0 PPC REPORTING
Closing
• We are changing Story and the industry.
– Retiring boomers
– Accelerating growth and development
• We have not invented a new type of planning but
simply have changed the culture we create and how
& when we discuss the work.
• Our effort will determine our future.
• Embrace the variance (it has always been there).
• Work to make our projects and people better each
day.
Questions?