Upload
camilla-hess
View
25
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Construction Defects. Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar September 24, 2002 Panelist: Carolyn Yau, ACAS. Overview. Background Actuarial Issues Methodologies Current Issues. Background. Montrose Decision Continuous trigger theory applied to pollution case - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Construction Defects
Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar
September 24, 2002
Panelist:
Carolyn Yau, ACAS
2
Overview
Background Actuarial Issues Methodologies Current Issues
3
Background
Montrose Decision Continuous trigger theory applied to pollution case
Stonewall Insurance Company vs. City of Palos Verdes Estates Carriers respond to claims on prorata basis
Frequency rises Severity falls
Insureds coverage is generally maximized Reinsurers less exposed Indemnity apportioned based on time on risk Expense apportioned based on number of carriers
4
Example: $3 Million Claim
Pre Montrose
0
500000
1000000
1500000
2000000
2500000
3000000
19
90
19
91
19
92
19
93
19
94
Primary Coverage Reinsurance Coverage
Post Montrose
0
500000
1000000
1500000
2000000
2500000
3000000
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
Primary Coverage Reinsurance Coverage
5
Actuarial Issues
Uncertain determination of accident date Varies by company and frequently within a company
Uncertain determination of future development pattern
Appears to be lengthening Influx of claim activity along recent accident year diagonals
Uncertain determination of tail factor selection One assumption to use is no more development after 13 years for
California Not sure if it will hold
6
Methodology: Obtain Program Knowledge
What is exposure mix (general contractor, designer/builders, subcontractors)
Is exposure residential or commercial construction Which states have construction defect exposure Is exposure information available What is the definition of a construction defect claim How is accident date determined What reinsurance agreements are in place
7
Methodology: Data Organization
California vs. Non California (or other specific states)
General Contractors vs. Subcontractors Accident year vs. report year data Separate ALAE
8
Methodology: Analysis
Accident Year Methods Report Year Methods Exposure Based Methods
9
Methodology: Accident Year Analysis
Traditional Loss Development Method is not appropriate
Montrose Adjustment Method Aids in selection of development factors and tail selection
Transactional Count / Incremental Paid Loss Method
Count times Severity Approach Key is estimating the ultimate reported counts
10
Methodology: Report Year Analysis
Estimate Development on Known Claims and Pure IBNR separately
Pure IBNR Count times Severity Approach Estimate reporting pattern of the remaining
claimsFitted DistributionEmpirical Distribution
11
Methodology: Exposure Analysis
Ideal method if data is available Develop list of policy holders
Compare policy holders with list of claimants to determine remaining exposure
Determine future reported claims by extrapolation or market share analysis
Earned GL premium for contractors is also useful
12
Issues in Construction DefectsOne Year Ago
Frequencies 1994 – 1999 rising 2000 flat
Severities 1994 – 1999 stable 2000 flat to declining
ALAE to loss ratios Rising over time Recommend monitoring separately from loss as still evolving
13
Issues in Construction DefectsToday
Mold Claims (Texas) Schools and public buildings Statute of limitations is shorter
Additional Insured ALAE (Southern California) Presley Homes, Inc. v. American States Insurance Company (2001) As general contractors reach their polity limits or go bankrupt, they
are looking for coverage under the subcontractor policies where they are listed as an “additional insured”
Sharing of defense costs among insurers
14
Issues in Construction Defects
Other States Areas of rapid increase in population
Baby boomers retiring – NV, FL, TX, AZ, CO Seen increase in activity but legal landscape is different Statute of limitations shorter Minimal use of continuous trigger theory Claim frequency is rising