7
1 Construction and analysis of dynamic transcription factor regulatory networks in the progression of glioma Yongsheng Li 1,2 , Tingting Shao 1,2 , Chunjie Jiang 1,2 , Jing Bai 1 , Zishan Wang 1 , Jinwen Zhang 1 , Lili Zhang 1 , Zheng Zhao 1 , Juan Xu 1, *, Xia Li 1, *

Construction and analysis of dynamic transcription … wild atory netw type and t orks by co he second nsidering I venny for DH IDH 7 Table S1. The proportion of TF-TF regulations

  • Upload
    duongtu

  • View
    219

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Construction and analysis of dynamic transcription … wild atory netw type and t orks by co he second nsidering I venny for DH IDH 7 Table S1. The proportion of TF-TF regulations

1  

Construction and analysis of dynamic transcription factor regulatory

networks in the progression of glioma

Yongsheng Li1,2, Tingting Shao1,2, Chunjie Jiang1,2, Jing Bai1, Zishan

Wang1, Jinwen Zhang1, Lili Zhang1, Zheng Zhao1, Juan Xu1,*, Xia Li1,*

Page 2: Construction and analysis of dynamic transcription … wild atory netw type and t orks by co he second nsidering I venny for DH IDH 7 Table S1. The proportion of TF-TF regulations

2  

 

 Figure S1. The distribution of correlation coefficient of TF-TF pairs were significantly distinct in three subtypes. A, CGGA dataset. B, TCGA dataset. C, REMBRANDT dataset. D, the KS test for the distribution of the corelation coefficient among TFs in three grades.

Page 3: Construction and analysis of dynamic transcription … wild atory netw type and t orks by co he second nsidering I venny for DH IDH 7 Table S1. The proportion of TF-TF regulations

3  

Figure S2. The transcription regulatory networks in three grades. A, grade II. B, grade III. C, grade IV.

Page 4: Construction and analysis of dynamic transcription … wild atory netw type and t orks by co he second nsidering I venny for DH IDH 7 Table S1. The proportion of TF-TF regulations

 

Figuspec

Figuin g

ure S3. Thcific

ure S4. Cyglioma.

he venny p

ytoscape de

plot shows

erived netw

that most

work showi

TF-TF in

ing all edge

nteractions

es that are

are uniqugr

grade-spe

ue to rade.

 

cific

Page 5: Construction and analysis of dynamic transcription … wild atory netw type and t orks by co he second nsidering I venny for DH IDH 7 Table S1. The proportion of TF-TF regulations

 

Figuregubetw

Figu

Figu(A) dataCGGusin

ure S5. Thulators anween distan

ure S6. The

ure S7. NetKaplan-Me

aset. (B) KGA test dang the TCGA

he venny plnd low-levent grades are

e overlap o

twork moteier surviva

Kaplan-Meieataset. (C) KA dataset.

lots show tel regulatoe lower than

of FFLs in t

tifs are assoal plots werer survival Kaplan-Mei

he overlapors in thren that of adj

three grade

ociated witre generated

plots wereier survival

p of masteree grades acent grade

es of glioma

th the survid for this me generatedl plots were

r regulatorsof glioma.

es.

 

a.

ival of gradmotif using td for this me generated

s, intermed. The over

de IV patiethe CGGA tmotif usingd for this m

diate rlaps

ents. train

g the motif

Page 6: Construction and analysis of dynamic transcription … wild atory netw type and t orks by co he second nsidering I venny for DH IDH 7 Table S1. The proportion of TF-TF regulations

 

Figumutmut

ure S8. Thetation statetation type.

e overlap oes. The firs

of grade spest venny for

ecific regulr IDH wild

latory netwd type and t

works by cothe second

 

onsidering Ivenny for

IDH IDH

Page 7: Construction and analysis of dynamic transcription … wild atory netw type and t orks by co he second nsidering I venny for DH IDH 7 Table S1. The proportion of TF-TF regulations

7  

Table S1. The proportion of TF-TF regulations obtained by using IDH wild and mutated samples. Grade IDH wild IDH mutated Union II 25.60% 70.92% 79.78% III 50.43% 29.63% 69.19% IV 96.39% 5.68% 96.83%

Table S2. The clinical information of the CGGA samples (Table S2.xls). Table S3. Clinicopathologic characteristics of patients with GBM in the TCGA cohort (n = 158). Number of patients

Characteristics Training set

N=79

Test set

N=79

P

Sex 0.11a

Female 49 53

Male 30 26

Age 0.64 b

Mean+SD 59.29+13.17 60.26+13.43

Range 21-85 30-89

IDH1 mutation 0.36 a

Mutated 5 3

Wild 74 76

Survival (day) 0.18b

Mean+SD 385.92+326.16 322.60+268.60

Range 6-1642 5-1448

State 0.99 a

Living 26 26

Death 53 53

Abbreviations: IDH1, isocitrate dehydrogenase 1; SD, standard deviation. a P values were determined using Fisher’s exact test. b P values were determined using student t test.