Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Constitutional Convention • Shays’ Rebellion illustrates that the national government is unable
to handle a crisis-the Articles of Confederation need serious revision
PHILADELPHIA 1787
• 55 delegates from 12 states meet to revise the Articles of Confederation’ – Wealthy, white males
– Average age is 42, 2/3 lawyers, 1/3 owned slaves
– Had political experience, from cities.
• No John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, Sam Adams, John Hancock, or Patrick Henry!
• Father of the Constitution – James Madison of Virginia
– Spoke over 200 times
The discussions revolved around several key issues, the most critical of which were:
• How should states be represented in congress?
• How many executives (presidents) should we have?
• Should slavery be abolished?
• How directly democratic will we be?
1787 CONVENTION MAJOR ISSUES
ISSUE VIRGINIA PLAN NEW JERSEY PLAN
SOURCE OF LEGISLATIVE POWER
Popular election/Based upon
state population
Reps selected by states
One rep per state
LEGISLATIVE STRUCTURE
Bicameral Unicameral
EXECUTIVE
Elected and removed by congress
More than one person; removable by majority
JUDICIARY
Life Tenure/Able to veto in Council of
Revision
No power over states
STATE LAWS
Legislature can override
Government can compel obedience to federal law
RATIFICATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL
AMENDMENTS
By the people
By the states
Constitutional Compromise
The Great Compromise (Connecticut Compromise)
• Divided congress into two houses (bicameral legislature)
• House of Reps based on state population (Big States Happy)
• Senate has two representatives per state (Small States Happy)
• One executive, popularly elected
Slavery Slavery
• The Declaration of Independence begins to change people’s attitudes towards slavery-many want it abolished.
• South Carolina and Georgia threaten to leave the Union.
Madison comes up with a solution
– 3/5 Compromise
• 3/5 of slaves were counted, for representation purposes
• Congress could outlaw the slave trade after 1808
Anti-Federalists
Opposed ratifying the new Constitution
MAJOR CONCERNS
1. Federal government would be distant from the people and slowly strip power from the states.
2. Federal government had far too broad taxation power
3. No Bill of Rights existed to restrain government power
4. SCOTUS would overrule the state courts
5. POTUS would come to command a large, standing army
Sam Adams Patrick Henry George Mason
Federalists
Supported ratifying the Constitution:
1. It corrected the failings of the A of C.
2. Without a strong, central government uniting the states, the country would break apart.
3. Believed no bill of rights was necessary-enough
structural check & balances existed to prevent tyranny.
Washington Madison Hamilton