3
DUE PROCESS Procedural Due Process A. Publication Requirement Tanada v. Tuvera, 146 SCRA 446 (1986) C. Administrative and Quasi-Judicial Proceedings Ang Tibay v. CIR 69 Phil. 635 Office of the Court Administrator v. Pascual 259 SCRA 604 Government of the United States v. Purganan, GR 148571, Sept. 24, 2002 Government of Hongkong v. Olalia, GR 153675, April 19, 2007 C. Academic Discipline Alcuaz v. PSBA 161 SCRA 7 U.P. v. Ligot-Telan 227 SCRA 342 E. Fixing of Rates and Regulation of Profession Philcomsat v. Alcuaz 180 SCRA 218 G. Termination Proceedings Agabon v. NLRC, G.R. No. 158693, 17 November 2004. Jaka Food Processing v. Pacot, G.R. No. 151378, 28 March 2005. Substantive Due Process United States v. Toribio 15 Phil. 85 Churchill v. Rafferty 32 Phil. 580 People v. Fajardo 104 SCRA 443 Rubi vs. Prov. Board of Mindoro, 39 Phil. 660 (1919) Balacuit v. CFI 163 SCRA 182 Agustin v. Edu 88 SCRA 195 Maranaw Hotel v. NLRC 238 SCRA 190 Ople v. Torres 293 SCRA 141 Estrada v. Sandiganbayan, GR 148560, Nov. 19, 2001 ABAKADA v. Ermita, 469 SCRA 1 GSIS v. Montescarlos, 434 SCRA 441

Consti 2 Syllabus II

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Atty. Pangan

Citation preview

Page 1: Consti 2 Syllabus II

DUE PROCESS

Procedural Due Process

A. Publication Requirement

Tanada v. Tuvera, 146 SCRA 446 (1986)

C. Administrative and Quasi-Judicial Proceedings

Ang Tibay v. CIR 69 Phil. 635Office of the Court Administrator v. Pascual 259 SCRA 604Government of the United States v. Purganan, GR 148571, Sept. 24, 2002Government of Hongkong v. Olalia, GR 153675, April 19, 2007

C. Academic DisciplineAlcuaz v. PSBA 161 SCRA 7U.P. v. Ligot-Telan 227 SCRA 342

E. Fixing of Rates and Regulation of Profession

Philcomsat v. Alcuaz 180 SCRA 218

G. Termination Proceedings

Agabon v. NLRC, G.R. No. 158693, 17 November 2004.Jaka Food Processing v. Pacot, G.R. No. 151378, 28 March 2005.

Substantive Due Process

United States v. Toribio 15 Phil. 85Churchill v. Rafferty 32 Phil. 580People v. Fajardo 104 SCRA 443Rubi vs. Prov. Board of Mindoro, 39 Phil. 660 (1919)Balacuit v. CFI 163 SCRA 182Agustin v. Edu 88 SCRA 195Maranaw Hotel v. NLRC 238 SCRA 190Ople v. Torres 293 SCRA 141Estrada v. Sandiganbayan, GR 148560, Nov. 19, 2001ABAKADA v. Ermita, 469 SCRA 1GSIS v. Montescarlos, 434 SCRA 441Mirasol v. DPWH, 490 SCRA 318Esponcilla v. Bagong Tanyag – 529 SCRA 654BF v. City Mayor – 515 SCRA 1

EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAW

People v. Cayat, 68 Phil. 12

Page 2: Consti 2 Syllabus II

Ichong v. Hernandez, 101 Phil. 1155Villegas v. Hiu Chiong Tsai Pao Ho, 86 SCRA 270Dumlao v. COMELEC, 96 SCRA 392Ormoc Sugar Central v. Ormoc City, L-23794, Feb. 17, 1968Binay v. Domingo, 201 SCRA 508Himagan v. People, 237 SCRA 538Tablarin v. Gutierrez, 152 SCRA 730Lim v. Pacquing, 240 SCRA 649Philippine Judges Association v. Prado, 227 SCRA 703Sison v. Ancheta, 130 SCRA 654Tiu v. CA, 301 SCRA 278Lacson v. Executive Secretary, 301 SCRA 298Soriano v. CA, GR 123936, March 4, 1999Loong v. COMELEC, 305 SCRA 832International School v. Quisumbing, 333 SCRA 13De Guzman v. COMELEC, GR 129118, July 19, 2000Dimaporo v. HRET , GR 158359, Mar. 23, 2004Dimayuga v. OMB 495 SCRA 461Plessy v. Fergusun, 163 US 537Craig v. Boren, 429 US 190Brown v. Secretary of Education, 347 US 483; 349 US 294

III. Arrests, Search and Seizure

Art. III, Secs. 2 and 3(2)

A. When is a search a “search”?

Valmonte v. General de Villa, 178 SCRA 211 and 185 SCRA 665Guazon v. De Villa, 181 SCRA 623

B. Purpose and Importance of the guaranty

Alvero v. Dizon, 76 Phil 637 (1946)

C. To Whom Directed

People vs. Andre Marti, 193 SCRA 57 (1991)

D. Who May Invoke the Right?

Bache and Co. v. Ruiz, 37 SCRA 323 (1971)Stonehill v. Diokno, 20 SCRA 383 (1967)