6
Liberty of abode and of travel Art III, Sec. 6 Marcos v. Manglapus, 177 SCRA 668 Villavicencio v. Lukban, 39 SCRA 778 Arroyo v. De Lima, GR No. 199034, November 15, 2011 (including Carpio’s dissent) Information and access to official records Art III, Sec. 7. Chavez v. PCGG, GR 130716 December 9, 1988 Neri v. Senate, GR 180643, March 25, 2008-09-23 and MR Antolin v. Domondon, GR No. July 5, 2010 Right to Form Associations Art. III, Sec. 8. Alliance of Government Workers v. Ministry of Labor, 124 SCRA 1 People v. Ferrer, 48 SCRA 382 Contract Clause Art. III, Sec. 10 Rutter vs. Esteban, 93 Phil. 68 (1953) Ortigas & Co. v. CA, G.R. No. 126102, December 4, 2000 Caleon vs. Agus Development Corp., 207 SCRA 748 (1992) Custodial Investigation Art. III, Sec. 12 R.A. No. 7438 Miranda vs. Arizona , 384 US , 436 (1966) Custodial Investigation People v. Lugod, G.R. 136253, February 21, 2001 People v. Del Rosario G.R. 127755, April 14, 1999

Consti 2 Second Half

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

dasdadsasad

Citation preview

Liberty of abode and of travel

Art III, Sec. 6

Marcos v. Manglapus, 177 SCRA 668Villavicencio v. Lukban, 39 SCRA 778Arroyo v. De Lima, GR No. 199034, November 15, 2011 (including Carpios dissent)

Information and access to official records

Art III, Sec. 7.

Chavez v. PCGG, GR 130716 December 9, 1988 Neri v. Senate, GR 180643, March 25, 2008-09-23 and MRAntolin v. Domondon, GR No. July 5, 2010

Right to Form Associations

Art. III, Sec. 8.

Alliance of Government Workers v. Ministry of Labor, 124 SCRA 1People v. Ferrer, 48 SCRA 382

Contract Clause

Art. III, Sec. 10

Rutter vs. Esteban, 93 Phil. 68 (1953)Ortigas & Co. v. CA, G.R. No. 126102, December 4, 2000Caleon vs. Agus Development Corp., 207 SCRA 748 (1992)

Custodial Investigation

Art. III, Sec. 12R.A. No. 7438

Miranda vs. Arizona , 384 US , 436 (1966)

Custodial Investigation

People v. Lugod, G.R. 136253, February 21, 2001 People v. Del Rosario G.R. 127755, April 14, 1999Police Lineup

Gamboa vs.Cruz, 162 SCRA 642 (1988) People v. Escordial, G.R. 138934, January 16, 2002

Competent & Independent Counsel

People vs. Bandula, 232 SCRA 566 (1994) People v. Bagnate, G.R. No. 133685-86 May 20, 2004

Counsel of ChoicePeople vs. Gallardo, G.R. No. 113684, Jan. 25, 2000People vs. Barasina, 229 SCRA 450 (1994)

Counsels presence required in entire proceedings

People v. Morial, G.R. 129295, August 15, 2001

Confession to NewsmenPeople v. Andan. 269 SCRA 95 (1997)People vs. Guillermo, GR. No. 147786, January 20, 2004

Other Confessions

People v. Mayo, G.R. No. 170470, September 26, 2006 People v. Gil, GR No. 172468, October 15, 2008

Re-enactmentPeople v. Luvendino, 211 SCRA 36 (1992)

Right to Bail

Art. III, Sec. 13

Bail Defined

Rule 114, Section 1, ROC

Kinds of BailRule 114, Sections 10, 11, 14 & 15

Paderanga v. CA, Aug. 28, 1995Govt. of the United States v. Purganan, Sept. 24, 2002Maguddatu v. CA, Feb. 23, 2000Pantillo v. Canoy, AM No. RTJ-11-2262, February 9, 2011

Rights of the Accused

Art. III, Sec. 14

a.Presumption of Innocence

Proof beyond reasonable doubt

People vs. Dramayo, 42 SCRA 59 (1971)

Applicability to Juridical Persons

Feeder Intl Line vs. CA CR 94262 May 31, 1991

b.Right to be heard personally or by counsel

Importance of Counsel

People vs. Holgado, 85 Phil. 752 (1950)

Improvident Plea of guilt

People vs. Baluyot, 75 SCRA 148 (1977)

Right to Lawyer of Choice

Libuit v. People, G.R. No. 154363, September 13, 2005

Deprivation of Right to be Heard

Moslares v. CA, 291 SCRA 440 (1998)

c.Right to be informed of nature and cause of accusation

Lack of Arraignment

People v. Dy, G.R. 115236, January 29, 2002

Sufficiency of the Information

People v. Cachapero, G.R. No. 153008, May 20, 2004

d.Right to speedy, impartial and public trial

Speedy trial

Dacanay vs. People, 240 SCRA 490 (1995)Public trial

Garcia vs. Domingo, 52 SCRA 143 (1970)

Impartial trial

Soriano vs Angeles, G.R. No. 109920. August 31, 2000

e.Right to confront witnesses

U.S. v. Javier, 37 Phil. 449 (1918)

f.Right to secure attendance of witnesses

People vs. De Luna, 174 SCRA 204 (1989)

g.Right to be present during trial

Trial in absentiaRule 115, Sec. 1 (c)People vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 140285, September 27, 2006

When presence of the accused is a duty:

Arraignment and pleaRule 116, Sec. 1 (b)

During trial for identification

Aquino vs. Military Commission No. 63 SCRA 546 (1975)People vs. Salas, 143 SCRA 163 (1986)

Promulgation of sentenceRule 120, Sec. 6Exception: Light offenses Right to Speedy Disposition of Cases

Art. III, Sec. 16

Duterte v. Sandiganbayan, 289 SCRA 721 (1998)Tatad vs. Sandiganbayan ; 159 SCRA 70 (1988)

Privilege against Self-Incrimination

Art. III, Sec. 17

Compulsory testimonial incrimination

United States vs. Tan Teh, 23 Phil. 145 (1912)Villaflor vs. Summers, 41 Phil. 62 (1920)People vs. Tranca, 235 SCRA 455 (1994)Pascual vs. Board of Medical Examiners, 28 SCRA 344 (1969)

Involuntary servitude

Art. III, Sec. 18Aclaracion vs. Gatmaitan, 64 SCRA 131 (1979)

Imprisonment for debt

Art. III, Sec. 20

Lozano v. Martinez, 146 SCRA 323People v. Nitafan, 207 SCRA 726

Double Jeopardy

Art. III, Sec. 21

People v. Quijada, July 24, 1996People v. Pineda, Feb. 11, 1993People v. Relova, 148 SCRA 292People v. Vergara, 221 SCRA 560Cuison v. CA, April 15, 1998Manantan v. CA, 350 SCRA 387

Ex post facto laws and bills of attainder

Art III, Sec. 22Kay Villegas Kami, 35 SCRA 429 (1970) People vs. Ferrer, 48 SCRA 382 (1972)Wright vs. CA, 235 SCRA 341 (1994)