Upload
dr-gary-e-riccio
View
218
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/12/2019 Consilience in Situated Physical Ergonomics
1/28
NASCENT SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, LLCBRINGING SCIENCE TO LIFE
Consilience in Situated Physical Ergonomics
Toward the Future Perfect Progressive Plural Tense
of Work and Life in the Wild
Prepared for Aptima Inc.
and the
U.S. Army Natick Soldier Research & Development Center
Gary E. Riccio, Ph.D.
August 10, 2012
8/12/2019 Consilience in Situated Physical Ergonomics
2/28
Riccio, 10AUG2012 Consilience
1
Programmatic Context for Innovation in Situated Physical Ergonomics
The following text is taken from an Aptima report to the U.S. Army Research,
Development and Engineering Center (Aptima, 2012). It describes the motivation for
Aptimas Cognitive Task Analysis (CTA) that was the context for Dr. Riccios
innovations in situated physical ergonomics. A concise report of those innovations
follows. While the work was directed toward an understanding of Soldier tasks andcapabilities, it is applicable to many other tasks in the workplace and in the activities of
daily living.
Full Spectrum Operations demand that the Army be capable of performing
effectively across a wide variety of missions and in a range of environments (e.g.,Headquarters Department of the Army, 2008; 2002/2008). This necessity implies
that small units and individual Soldiers must also be able to perform a wide range
of tasks building on abilities such as problem solving and initiative (e.g., Riccio,
Diedrich, & Cortes, 2010). Indeed, to be successful, the 21stCentury Soldier must
possess competencies including but not limited to character and accountability;
comprehensive fitness; adaptability and initiative; critical thinking and problem
solving; as well as tactical and technical competence (Department of the Army,2011a). Similarly, drawing on these abilities at the Squad level, Soldiers must
work as a team to effectively conduct a range of tasks, in varied contexts, ranging
from conduct attack to conduct low-level information operations to maintain
situational awareness (Department of the Army, 2011b). The challenge, however,
is that performance depends on multiple factors such as previous training,
equipment, teammates, the environment, and the relative abilities of the
adversary.
Accordingly, the U.S. Army Natick Soldier Research, Development and
Engineering Center (NSRDEC) is investigating the effects of a key factor, load,
on Soldier performance including cognitive, biomechanical, and physiological
influences. Load is an essential issue to understand due to the ever changing toolsthat have accompanied and will continue to accompany modernization of the
battlefield. Almost any introduction of novel equipment impacts Soldier load,
necessitating tradeoffs in mobility, lethality, and survivability. A key challenge
is therefore to understand, anticipate, and facilitate these tradeoffs in order to
optimally impact Soldier and Squad performance
Aptima is working with NSRDEC to develop a framework and associated
measurement library for understanding how effects of load, as measured in the
laboratory, are related to impact on Soldier and Squad behavior. This work is
proceeding through the development of Performance Indicators (PIs), which are
observable behaviors that can be used to assess Soldier and Squad performance.
These PIs are linked to critical Squad tasks, and associated events in the 72 hourscenario, as well as laboratory tasks and measures designed to explore aspects of
cognition and biomechanics that are likely impacted by load. To facilitate
linking of laboratory findings to Soldier and Squad behaviors, the framework
includes a translational layer that provides information regarding context and
Soldier and Squad requirements that impact what must be done, and
consequently, what must be measured. As a result, the framework serves to
enable predictions of how load might affect cognition and biomechanics, and
therefore, how load might impact Soldier and Squad behavior.
8/12/2019 Consilience in Situated Physical Ergonomics
3/28
Riccio, 10AUG2012 Consilience
2
Consilience in Situated Physical Ergonomics:
Toward the Future Perfect Progressive Plural Tense of Work and Life in the Wild
The original intent for the work summarized in this report was to integrate
cognitive sciencewith the physical and biological sciences, most notably the
disciplines associated with biomechanics, in ways that can facilitate transition of
research to the field for tasks associated with Soldiering in the contemporaryoperating environment. Making efficacious connections between such research
and reality requires nothing less than crossing the common boundaries between
mind and body, between an individual and the surroundings, between persons
and things, and between initiative and accountability. The theory and
methodology outlined in this report are being developed to help with thesechallenging dimensions of translation.
There are several noteworthy aspects of the approach we are developing. One is
to create a productive synergy between quantitative and qualitative
methodologies so we can utilize both the laboratory and narrative in
understanding the intimate and generative interrelationships between behavior
and experience. The most exciting implication of this nexus is to bring the studyof behavior out of the razors edge of the present into the full expanse of time
that influences human thinking and experience in ways that transcend physical
causality while remaining grounded in the physics of human action in the world.
Another important aspect of this work is the concept of nesting. This is more like
engineering synthesis than scientific analysis but not so starkly as most work in
modeling. Nesting allows us to put together scientific studies ostensibly of
different kindsto appreciate behavior in more realistic or actual settings of work
and life. At the same time, it can generate new directions for analysis that can be
quite focused without being limited to the conventional boundaries of familiar
scientific disciplines. To facilitate nesting, aperiodic tableis presented for
human movement that can be applied to many situations of work and theactivities of daily living.
The periodic table represents an ontology for human movement with concepts
that map across different epistemologies or ways of thinking about human
movement. While the periodic table is a guide to synthesis, the associated
ontology provides a framework within which to catalogue scientific paradigms
and particular studies. A sample of such a transdisciplinary library is included as
an appendix to this report.
1. Leveraging the Cognitive Task Analysis
Aptimas CognitiveTask Analysis (CTA) led to a large number of useful performanceindicators (PI) that, of necessity, are directly relevant to cognition (Aptima, 2012). The
hallmark of human cognition is the ability to comprehend things beyond the moment and
beyond the situation at hand through such processes as remembering, imagining,
anticipating, inductively inferring, inter-temporally reasoning, computationally reasoning,
comparing, deciding, and intending. Biomechanics and other disciplines pertaining to
human movement, on the other hand, are first and foremost about processes that play out
in the moment and in the situation at hand. Thus, the vast majority of PI do not map to a
compact or homogeneous set of physical or biological processes.
8/12/2019 Consilience in Situated Physical Ergonomics
4/28
Riccio, 10AUG2012 Consilience
3
Our vision for an integration of cognition with the physical and biological
sciences, in the wild, required a turn and an associated methodological
innovation.
Our transdisciplinary challenge leveraged the fact that the PI are more than a large set of
relevant behavioral observables. They are a highly structured set of observables generallywith subject-predicate-object implications. They are the seeds for telling a story. In fact,
many of the PI were elicited from subject matter experts (SME) in the context of telling
about their first-hand experiences as ground Soldiers and the meaning that these
experiences had for them and others. The 72-hour scenario that provided the backdrop for
Aptimas elicitation of PI inexorably led these experience fragments to be woven intostories. Past, present, and future were intertwined in the discussion of experience
fragments and increasingly so as the richness of the stories evolved across multiple
interactions with SMEs. Issues pertaining to fatigue and thermoregulation, for example,
explicitly emerged in the discussion of time periods on the order of days and three-
dimensional spatial scales on the order of kilometers. It also became clear that cause-
effect relationships among past, present, and future were exceedingly important over
much shorter times scales on the order of seconds to minutes and over spatial scales onthe order of meters, that is, on spatiotemporal scales of more extensive relevance to
human movement science.
One of our methodological innovations was to initiate a process, concurrent with the
CTA, of collaboratively reflecting on experience fragments of our SMEs that pertained to
human movement. Typically, the time scale over which this telling and reflection took
place was longer than the experience that was being described. This allowed us, in a
sense, to get inside the head of the Soldier with respect to the experience of human
movement. We refer to this level of discourse as micro-experiences (Riccio, Diedrich,
& Cortez, 2010). On the foundation of the CTA, our discussion of micro-experiences
allowed us to reflect on movement as task directed and organized, that is, as purposeful
and operationally relevant. We self-consciously tried to talk about these experiencefragments in the progressive tenses. This was not the most natural way to tell a story but,
even when used occasionally, it helped us stay in the moment and avoid lapsing into
third-person descriptions. We also tried to talk about micro-experiences in the second-
person voice but that was more difficult. It required a level of shared experience that
mere conversation could not achieve, thus it required another methodological innovation
(see section 2).
The following vignettes are examples of micro-experiences we discussed, although they
are not literal transcriptions. They are not taken from a single conversation but they
capture the gist of a few themes that cut across several conversations. They are a bit
stylized to emphasize the way we believe the methodology should be used.
Vignette example 1
I am looking at a wall that we would have to move over, around, or
through to reach the house where a high value target (HVT) may be
hiding. I consider that my teammate, who is a breacher, may need two
charges or other special breaching tools to get through the door of the
house because often these houses have double doors, a metal outer door
and a wooden inner door. Our decisions about how to approach the
8/12/2019 Consilience in Situated Physical Ergonomics
5/28
Riccio, 10AUG2012 Consilience
4
house, and carrying what, will have been easier if I can get to the house
and check out the situation. I am thinking about the amount of time it
would take to get past the wall in various ways to approach the house in
a timely fashion without being detected. I look over to a relatively new
teammate, he looks back, and we both know what the decision will be
even though we dont have a lot of experience together. We both know
that he will get down on all fours in front of the wall and I will use hisback as a step from which to jump to the top of the wall. I am thinking
about the kit I am carrying, what I am wearing, what I can take over the
wall with me, and how that will affect my movement over the wall.
Vignette example 2
I remember a day when I was getting ready to do my daily PT. I
remember myself remembering how important it was that I was
physically fit for a rush to an objective that followed a long march. Then
I remember being surprised by a thought that seemed at first to have
nothing to do with PT. I remember myself remembering how difficult it
was for me to cut on the uneven terrain with some new kit I was carryingwith me. I felt clumsy and almost slipped and stumbled because of the
unfamiliar way the kit moved on my body when I made abrupt
movements or changes in direction. I remember that on that day of PT,
as a result of reflection on my experience with the new kit, that I should
try doing PT with my kit so I might become more familiar with it.
Subsequently, this has become my practice. PT has become about
learning to move with my kit, to have it feel like it is part of me, and not
just about physical fitness. I no loner think solely about speed, distance,
or repetitions when doing PT. I think about Soldiering. PT has become
training, training has become an objective, a Soldiers task, not just time
spent usefully preparing nor just waiting to do a Soldiers tasks. My kit
feels like it is part of me yet I have not lost my knowledge of what I cando slick. Strangely I notice, for example, that I am less likely to bend
over and check what is under a table when I am carrying a full load. I
wonder what this means. I wonder what it would have meant if I didnt
notice this.
The first vignette represents the most important theme in our discussions, that of flow
and transition in tactical thinking and action (thinking in action). These are deep
concepts that could not be more practical. At a high level, they refer to a kind of
momentum of individual and small unit actions that can survive the unpredictability of
the operating environment, from moment to moment, whether hostile or not. These
concepts are as much about biomechanics (e.g., physical constraints on action and
multiple physical solutions to a problem at hand) as about cognition (e.g, outwardorientation, adaptability) if not the practical overlap between these domains. The second
vignette illustrates a related area of overlap between cognition and biomechanics, ones
understanding of ones own capabilities. Whether implicit or explicit, and whether
veridical or not, this self-knowledge is critical to decisions made in the moment that can
have immediate life and death consequences. Of necessity, knowledge of ones own
capabilities and those of others also is invaluable in planning, and the consequences are
important even though they are delayed.
8/12/2019 Consilience in Situated Physical Ergonomics
6/28
Riccio, 10AUG2012 Consilience
5
More generally, the details that emerged from these discussions resulted in a growing list
of human movement tasks that could be described in ways that would be recognizable
and understandable both to Soldiers and scientists (see section 3). They also enabled
another innovation, Quick Look events, that allowed us to share experiences more
directly than through words alone (see section 2, Figure 1).
Figure 1. Broader task analysis for biomechanics (see sections 2-3).
2 Collaborative Experience in Quick Look Events
Our collaborative reflection on micro-experiences both required and enabled a deeper
level of shared experience. The vignettes around which this reflection centered were in
many ways as detailed and connected as a script for a play or at least as the framework
for an improvisational play. We thus were able to create situations, much like rock drills
in the Army, in which we all could participate and share experiences on which we would
be able to reflect collaboratively. We were able do so concurrent with the experiences
and subsequent to them. We refer to these improvisational, shared experiences as Quick
Look events. Unique and essential attributes of Quick Looks are highlighted below:
Situated collaborative problem solving in which dialogue is grounded in aspects
of a situation that are collectively observable and verifiable and thus lessobfuscated by differences in jargon and unspecified assumptions. Shared
experience in a rich setting of relevant observables provides a plethora of
boundary objects that facilitate communication and connections among
disparate communities of practice (e.g., in the sense of Wenger, 1998). This is as
important in bridging the gap between different scientific disciplines as it is
between Soldiers and scientists (cf., Trochim, Marcus, Msse, et al., 2008).
8/12/2019 Consilience in Situated Physical Ergonomics
7/28
Riccio, 10AUG2012 Consilience
6
While not necessary, outdoor settings are preferred for Quick Looks. The reason
for an outdoor setting often is confounded with the need for full immersion in an
environment that allows for mobility, multiple vantage points, and
omnidirectional perception (e.g., land navigation, aiming at multiple distances,
controlling inhabited or uninhabited vehicles, locating friend or foe), and in many
cases to provide realism that is difficult to simulate or represent (e.g., non-
Hookean dynamics of sand, mud, snow).
Shared situation awareness (SA) is the fundamental determinant of value, andthis is not limited to outdoor demonstrations even if it is considerably easier to
achieve outdoors for many tasks. Shared situation awareness, as opposed to
identical situation awareness, is useful to the extent that relatively small
differences in vantage point blend first-person and third-person perspectives.
This, in turn, fosters insightful collaborative reflection (e.g., Hamaoui, 2011).
Implicit in the value of shared SA is the opportunity for concurrent reciprocalinfluence among participations. The coupling between shared SA and reciprocal
influence gives participants "inescapable accountability" for the influence they
have on each other. They share their engagement with the world. They co-exist.
Sharing the experience of such connections, and the meaning it implies, enables a
deeper understanding of team dynamics. Quick Looks enable communication
from the second-person standpoint that otherwise is difficult without
contemporaneous shared experience (Riccio, Diedrich, & Cortez, 2010).
A value added, that generally is quite considerable, is that outdoor experiences
lend themselves to large-scale attendance and optional participation. Outdoor
demonstrations can allow attendees to move rather easily between passive
observation and active participation. Accordingly, they can be designed to foster
initiative, improvisation, and serendipity (Riccio, Diedrich, & Cortez, 2010).
We conducted two Quick Looks during the period of performance. One was at a site formilitary operations in urban terrain (MOUT) in an undisclosed location (Figure 2). The
other was on hiking trails at Mount Monadnock, NH (Figure 3). At the MOUT site, we
focused on the task of enter and clear a room and setting up a traffic control point
spread over a two-day period. At Mount Monadnock, over approximately eight hours, we
focused on land navigation during the approach phase of search and attack.
Our principal operational SME approached the Quick Looks as rehearsals such as rock
drills. In his approach to rehearsals, he periodically breaks the squad into teams to
generate discussion about their roles and responsibilities, to allow for initiative, and
sharing the meaning of the task and how it is approached. Normally, in these breakout
discussions during the rock drills, teams discuss operational issues and context. Our
adaptation is that we allow the scientists to use this as an opportunity to introduce theirrespective scientific perspectives on the activities and task at hand. When the operational
SME is not with a particular team introducing operational context, the team can take the
discussion in whatever direction they like.
8/12/2019 Consilience in Situated Physical Ergonomics
8/28
Riccio, 10AUG2012 Consilience
7
Figure 2. Collaborative experience in Enter and Clear a Room for Quick Look #1.
Figure 3. Collaborative experience in land navigation during Quick Look #2.
8/12/2019 Consilience in Situated Physical Ergonomics
9/28
Riccio, 10AUG2012 Consilience
8
In addition to collaborative reflection and extemporaneous discussion, the Quick Looks
included walk-throughs of events that normally occur very quickly (e.g., breach, clearing
a room) in addition to conducting the event at normal speed. Typical (moving) vantage
points of various members of a team were captured using video cameras. Video and still
photographs also were taken from third-person perspectives.
An important element of the Quick Looks was to appreciate 4d terrain. Four
dimensional (4d) terrain considers apertures (e.g., windows, doors, partial enclosures),
passageways (e.g., paths, hallways), obstacles (e.g., furniture, clutter, vegetation,
outcroppings), and barriers (e.g., walls, fortifications) as constraints on traversability that
alter the manner and speed with which a space can be traversed. 4d terrain brings timeinto the three cardinal dimensions of space but as an outcome rather than as a causal
variable. The layout of a building interior, for example, has a significant impact on
entering and clearing a room. In mountainous terrain, even with contour maps and
satellite imagery, it may be difficult or impossible to appreciate what one can see from a
particular place on the map.
In wooded terrain, it is difficult to appreciate what one can see through the clutter evenwith photographs from particular vantage points with the relevant seasonal foliage.
Inside the 4d terrain, motion parallax (e.g., head movements) and the three-dimensional
spatial vision it enhances helps overcome the intentional or natural camouflage of color,
size, and shape of optical texture in the surroundings. In all environments, the constraints
of natural surfaces and clutter on locomotion are difficult or impossible to appreciate
without actually experiencing them. Rehearsals in complex terrain foster thinking that is
more topological than geometric, and that is more dynamical than kinematic. These are
just a few examples of the operationally relevant considerations that we were able to
address in considerable scientific and operational detail as a result of our shared
experience in Quick Looks.
Situated collaborative problem solving in Quick Looks had a direct andpowerful influence on our literature review, recommendations, and weighting
of promising directions in the scientific support for design, evaluation, and
planning of Soldier load.
3 Behavioral-Experiental Ontology: A Periodic Table for Human Movement
Collaborative reflection on micro-experiences and sharing those experiences in Quick
Look events have been invaluable methods of collaboration within our diverse team and
with diverse stakeholders for R&D pertaining to Soldier load. They were not sufficient,
however, for a sustained scientific investigation in which systematic traceable progress
can be made. We needed a shared conceptual framework within which a diversity of
stakeholders could communicate effectively about expectations and outcomes of thetransdisciplinary program of research (Flyvberg, 2001; Msse, Moser, Stokols, et al.,
2008; Stokols, Fuqua, Gress, et al., 2003).
The science of transdisciplinary science emphasizes the important of concept maps and
logic models that aid communication among communities of practice with different
jargon and assumptions. They are a source of indicators (or near-term outcomes) with
respect to which progress in a systematic integrated program of research can be traced
over time (Quinlan, Kane, & Trochim, 2008, Trochim, Marcus, Msse, et al., 2008). The
8/12/2019 Consilience in Situated Physical Ergonomics
10/28
Riccio, 10AUG2012 Consilience
9
development of concept maps typically begins with talking points, considerations, and
points of converging interest that can be communicated in a language that is
understandable by people from different disciplines. There can be hundreds of items in
such a shared ontology. Various psychometric methods then can be used to organize the
items into a map that one can use to understand the relationship of ones own community
of practice to another community of practice (e.g., different scientific disciplines).
Concept maps help one become a more informed consumer of information from anothercommunity or discipline.
The best concept maps promote discovery and innovation, that is, emergent
properties in the integration of different disciplines rather than mere
comparisons and analogies (Rosenfield, 1992).
Collaborative reflection and Quick Look events led to a list of human movement
concepts described in ways that would be recognizable and understandable both to
Soldiers and scientists from a variety of disciplines. For the most part, the concepts were
described in the language of everyday experience (Figure 4). In particular, the concepts
refer to observable behavior that is sufficiently familiar experientially to be associated
with common words or phrases. There were some exceptions where the concept could notbe expressed in any compact way in nonscientific and nonmilitary jargon (e.g.,
oculomotor dynamics, defilade posture). Such exceptions are less problematic due to the
structure of the concept map (i.e., our ontology for human movement) in which less
familiar terms generally are nested within broader categories that are more familiar.
A taxonomic numbering scheme is used for the ontology (i.j.k-l.m.n) for several reason:
(a) to facilitate navigation through any associated visualization or tabulation, (b) to reveal
gaps and shortfalls in the scientific community with respect to the needs of NSRDEC and
its stakeholders, (c) to facilitate mappings to the Performance Indicators, and (d) for
future use in computer programs. The characteristics of the numbering scheme are
described below.
The first set of three numbers (i.j.k) reflects a part of the map that can be organized as a
tree structure solely for the purpose of navigation. There currently are 63 behavioral-
experiential concepts classified by 21 "core processes" (i.j) and 5 high-level blocks (i) of
categories. Core processes (i.j) are a level of task specificity at which particular scientists
or particular laboratories tend to specialize. Figure 4 depicts the ontology as a periodic
table of behavioral-experiential elements that can be combined in various ways to
describe and assess more complex behavior. In this sense, while the concepts can be
visualized as a tree structure, their use is not limited to the assumptions of a strict tree
structure. Complex behavior involves concurrent and sequential nesting of elements in
this periodic table. Behavior within blocks 1 and 3 (and between these blocks) typically
are nested sequentially, and they can be assessed as such. Behavior in blocks 2, 4, and 5
typically is concurrently nested with behavior in Blocks 1 or 3, and they can be assessedas such.
While nesting has esoteric (epistemological and ontological) significance in the
scientific community, it is a practical exigency for science that is relevant to
Soldiers. It is a reason for science that is relevant to Soldiers.
8/12/2019 Consilience in Situated Physical Ergonomics
11/28
Riccio, 10AUG2012 Consilience
10
Figure 4. Experiential-behavioral categories (i.j.k) organized into blocks (i).Numbers to the left of each category are ratings on a seven-point scale (1=highest).Higher ratings indicate operational relevance together with opportunity for scientificprogress.
Numbers after the dash (l.m.n) denote particular lab tasks classified hierarchically into
groups (Figure 5). Group lis a level of classification for lab paradigms that generalizes
across many core processes (i.j.k). This group generally refers to constraints on action
that, collectively, provide a roadmap for continual development in a science of load
planning. Group mis a basic level of classification for which different paradigms or
laboratory tasks address a common construct. Group nis the level of classification that
corresponds to a particular laboratory task (e.g., particular citations). There is a dash
between i.j.k and l.m.nbecause, in principle, the latter generally can be applied to any of
the categories of the former (although in the present work, this elaboration has been
worked out only for running and walking). This relatively mundane nuance of the
numbering scheme can be a source of considerable transdisciplinary innovation in
operationally-relevant human movement science.
The two-part ontology (e.g., represented in Figure 5) juxtaposes a practical framework of
concepts expressed in everyday language with a more esoteric framework that reveals
linkages to powerful scientific paradigms. Group l, for example, generally refers to
8/12/2019 Consilience in Situated Physical Ergonomics
12/28
Riccio, 10AUG2012 Consilience
11
organismic constraints (l=1, 2), environmental constraints (l=3), and task constraints (l=4,
5). The delineation of these classes of constraints on action has been a powerful source of
transdisciplinary integration in academe (Newell, 1986) and in federally-funded R&D
(Riccio, 1993/1997). Karl Newells leadership in the academic amalgam of Kinesiology
is noteworthy in this regard. He has explicated the challenges and some solutions for
transdisciplinary integration in kinesiology given that there are over one hundred
different combinations of disciplines across the various academic departments that arerepresented by or at least associated with this community of practice and scholarship (see
e.g., Newell, 2007). The relevant disciplines include physics, biology, psychology,
sociology, and the humanities. The value of any organizing framework for such an
amalgam is that it helps reveal and promulgate reciprocal impact and innovation between
different disciplines. This is the intent of our behavioral-experiential ontology and theassociated periodic table.
In an academic department of kinesiology, the term biomechanics typically has a fairly
narrow connotation to distinguish scholars with more of an interest in physics from those
who bring other powerful constructs to the study of human movement. At NSRDEC,
there is no need for such internal differentiation. Of necessity, a more integrated
organization is required to transition science to the organizations that need guidance inequipping Soldiers for enhanced mobility, lethality, and survivability. The number and
variety of scholars associated with the term biomechanics at NSRDEC is closer to the
breadth of a department of kinesiology at a major university than to a narrower
connotation limited to the physics of human movement. In the context of the present
project, the desired integration with cognitive science underscores the connection with
the history and sociology of kinesiology as a discipline of disciplines. We thus have been
using the term biomechanics in a very broad sense in our work for NSRDEC.
Our broad view of the science relevant to biomechanics has had very practical and
comprehensive implications for our work. For example, the scientific disciplines
represented in the ontology are numerous, and the organizational affiliations of authors
on the associated citations in the biomechanics library explicitly reveal this breadth(section 4, Appendix). They include but are not limited to mechanical engineering (e.g.,
boundary conditions for systems that support conveyance and transportation), electrical
and computer engineering (e.g., robotics), aerospace engineering (e.g., adaptive control
systems), industrial engineering (e.g., occupational biomechanics and ergonomics,
manual control), bioengineering (e.g., physiological control systems, prosthetics,
orthotics), human movement science (e.g., biomechanics of posture and locomotion,
motor control, motor behavior, exercise and sport physiology, exercise and sport
psychology, exercise and sport sociology), psychology (e.g., perception and
psychophysics, psychophysiology, learning and development), health science (e.g.,
physical therapy, occupational therapy), neurology (e.g., neuropathology, neurometrics),
biology (e.g., comparative biomechanics, anatomy, physiology).
The ontology (e.g., as represented in part in Figure 5) shows how paradigmatic concepts
from one discipline can be applied to another. The particular citations in the
biomechanics library (Appendix) make these connections concrete but, in most cases, the
connections might be overlooked without the ontology. The ontology thus helps outsiders
become informed consumers of knowledge from an unfamiliar discipline of scholarship.
Moreover, it helps insiders look at their own discipline through a different lens. In both
ways, this approach to transdisciplinary integration fosters innovation (Riccio,
1993/1997).
8/12/2019 Consilience in Situated Physical Ergonomics
13/28
Riccio, 10AUG2012 Consilience
12
Figure 5. Behavioral-experiential categories (i.j.k) differentiated intogroups (l.m). Numbers to the left of each category are ratings on a seven-point scale (1=highest). Higher ratings indicate operational relevancetogether with opportunity for scientific progress.
4 Biomechanics Library
To date, 103 categories of behavior have been identified as relevant to our discussions
and collaborative reflection about micro-experiences (Appendix). All these categories
were rated (weighted) by the investigator responsible for the biomechanics analysis
described above. Ratings were based on operational relevance and opportunity forscientific impact. Each category was rated on a seven-point scale in which the highest
rating reflected a high degree of relevance and opportunity. Relevance was based on
discussions pertaining to the operational tasks, 72-hour scenario, and development of
performance indicators as a whole (i.e., as opposed to specific PI). Soldier load
influenced the ratings of relevance given that it was a central theme throughout the CTA
and the concurrent discussions of micro-experiences. Opportunity was based on the
feasibility of research that would advance theory or evidence beyond the current body of
relevant scientific literature. The lowest rating reflected low relevance and opportunity. It
8/12/2019 Consilience in Situated Physical Ergonomics
14/28
Riccio, 10AUG2012 Consilience
13
should be noted, however, that this designation of lowest is relative. By their very
inclusion in the ontology, all categories of behavior are noteworthy because they emerged
in our reflection on Soldiers micro-experiences.
A middle rating indicated high on one dimension and low on the other. Thus, a middle
rating could indicate relevant research where there is little opportunity either because of a
barrier to conducting the research or because a substantial body of relevant scientificliterature already exists. Alternatively, a middle rating could reflect an opportunity for
novel research that isnt especially relevant. Brief narrative summaries (descriptions)
are provided for the relevance and opportunity of all 103 categories in the library.
Two or three citations to the relevant scientific literature are provided for over 60 of the103 categories of behavior. All the categories rated 1 and 2, and almost all of the
categories rated 3, have citations associated with them. Some of the lower rated
categories also have citations associated with them; typically this is the case for
categories that potentially could have much greater relevance and opportunity if
combined in innovative ways with other categories. To date, citations are provided only
for complete documents that are publicly available on the web (generally linked through
Google Scholar). Citations are intended to stimulate innovation and to be somewhatrepresentative but not comprehensive. They are biased toward recent, replicable, peer-
reviewed research but with some important exceptions. Citations are provided for early or
classic works in which key assumptions are most likely to be explained or justified. They
also are provided for peer-reviewed research that potentially is more valuable to
NSRDEC than to the broader academic community. Citations occasionally are provided
for research having had minimal peer review if it has compelling relevance to NSRDEC.
Figure 6. Library of measures used in relevant scientific domains.
8/12/2019 Consilience in Situated Physical Ergonomics
15/28
Riccio, 10AUG2012 Consilience
14
Behavioral-experiential categories from the biomechanics analysis were mapped into
performance indicators (PI) even though these PI were the result of a cognitivetask
analysis (Figure 6). Because of the epistemological differences between cognitive science
and biomechanics highlighted in section 1, a large number of the 103 categories in the
biomechanics analysis are relevant to specific PI, and vice versa. At the same time, it is
not the case that everything is related to everything. The structure of the ontology for
biomechanics enabled us to identify a basic or middle level (i.j) that differentiatedusefully among different PI. For consistency with the cognitive mapping to PI, we refer
to this basic level as core processes. The links in the library enable one to go from PI to
behavioral-experiential categories in the biomechanics analysis or in the other direction.
The mapping is at a higher level of abstraction, of necessity, than for the cognitive tasks.
This higher level of abstraction has a qualitatively different kind of value.
Consider, for example, the PI develop a plan and the sub-PI determine route within
the context of the squad critical task of conduct reconnaissance for the planning phase
of search and attack within the 72-hour scenario. All the core processes within the
biomechanics group of move over, through, and around (i.e., 1.1 locomotion, 1.2
fording, 1.3 climbing, 1.4 jumping) potentially are relevant to this PI, and there are a
large number of laboratory tasks in biomechanics that are relevant to the PI and theassociated core processes for biomechanics. Yet, when one looks at one of the
behavioral-experiential categories (i.e., category of lab tasks), there is considerable utility
even for analyses that are not limited to biomechanics.
It would not be practical to pursue comprehensively a level of detail below the current set
of PI. Selecting a subset of PI for more detailed task analysis is the only alternative. The
behavioral-experiential detail provided by the biomechanical analysis is a good basis
from which to prioritize and do a more selective analysis because this detail includes
science that we know to be feasible and relevant. If, for example, one looks at the
particular category of lab task 1.1.1-3 of running through challenging terrain, there
can be highly detailed and productive collaboration between Soldiers and scientists that is
relevant to the squad critical task of conduct reconnaissance. The problem of conductreconnaissance becomes nonarbitrarily more specific because the additional specificity in
further analysis of the operational situation can be driven by knowledge of science that
can be brought to bear on the problems that subsequently would be identified in this more
specific discussion. This is what the library reveals to us. It is actionable and insightful
precisely because the mapping to PI is at a higher level of abstraction. It points the way to
more detailed analysis even on the operational side of the problem and in scientific
disciplines outside those addressed by the library.
The mere existence of the behavioral-experiential categories is a powerful
weighting and prioritization for further analysis. The explicit weightings of
these categories simply add to this value. The chance of an analytical dead end
thus is considerably reduced.
Consider the grounded dialogue that would be stimulated by subcategory 1.1.1-3-5
spatial constrained. What would one need to have reconnaissance about if running
through challenging terrain is an issue? What are the conditions under which that would
be likely to happen? Is there limited visibility because of wooded terrain and bends in the
road? Is the terrain sloped such that there are vantage points above the route of travel that
would reduce survivability? What can Soldiers see from the vantage point of their
intended route given wooded and mountainous terrain? Should Soldiers split into two
8/12/2019 Consilience in Situated Physical Ergonomics
16/28
Riccio, 10AUG2012 Consilience
15
teams for more refined reconnaissance with near-term implications? Can autonomous
robots (e.g., SUGV, SUAV) effectively provide an alternative for such beyond-line-of-
sight reconnaissance? How closely packed are trees off the route, how thick is the
underbrush, and to what extent and with what difficulty is it traversable? How quickly
can Soldiers doff kit and what effect would this have on their mobility? How would
doffed kit influence the lethality of Soldiers? What is the impact on tactical
marksmanship if Soldiers need to jump or otherwise move abruptly to another locationand vantage point where a shoot/no-shoot decision will have to be made? All these topics
emerged in situated collaborative problem solving during our Quick Look on Mount
Monadnock. More importantly, the biomechanics library shows the productive scientific
directions one can take to address the implications of the questions above.
A different set of productive questions arises when considering different elements of the
biomechanics library such as the subcategories 1.1.1-3.2 compliant surfaces and 1.1.1-
3.3 slippery surfaces. What are the factors that influence these properties of the support
surface such as the relative amounts of sand, clay, rock, and moisture? To what extent
can multispectral sensing (e.g., sensor package on a robotic asset) provide reconnaissance
about the composition of the terrain? To what extent do the relative amounts of sand, clay,
rock, and moisture influence the stability, efficiency, and energy expenditure of running,and to what extent is this different for walking (as addressed in subcategories under 1.1.2-
3)? To what extent does this complement a load planning tool that provides information
on energy expenditure as a function of distance and changes in elevation over different
routes as well as branching points depending on the likelihood that a particular segment
of a route has been washed out or flooded? To what extent can this information be
integrated in decisions based on use of a load planning tool or integrated into such
decision aids for route planning? These are exceedingly relevant questions with potential
impact on capability development based on science that the library tells us is available.
Thus there would be a relatively high return on an investment in further analysis of the
route planning PI based on mapping to the behavioral-experiential categories in the
biomechanics library.
The mapping between PI and biomechanics at a high level of abstraction (i.e.,
basic level of core processes) leads to scientific detail that can be exploited in
more refined analysis of operational tasks that has a higher payoff than
otherwise would be possible.
5 Toward a Transdisciplinary Science of Soldier and Squad-Level Capabilities
There are a number of features to the library that are generative. The library goes beyond
description of the relevance of science to operations and vice versa to suggest priorities
and potential directions for innovation in both science and operations. The mapping of
core and secondary processes to performance indicators, for example, came to have some
interesting attributes. Typically there are multiple processes associated with a particularPI. As indicated above, this will be useful in directing further scientific discussion and
investigation of the squad-critical tasks and the 72-hour scenario. It provides a path to the
development of measures, based on the PI, which can provide actionable feedback to
guide continuous development of individual and squad-level capabilities.
In the context of measure development, the multiplicity of processes of relevance to
particular PI also introduces the concept of nesting. This nesting is generative insofar as it
suggests ways to integrate ostensibly incommensurate experimental paradigms to achieve
8/12/2019 Consilience in Situated Physical Ergonomics
17/28
Riccio, 10AUG2012 Consilience
16
a balance of internal and external validity that is appropriate for evidence-based
development of Soldier systems. As an element of our framework for transdisciplinary
science, nesting is a raison dtre for research in Army Research, Development, and
Engineering Centers that is not likely to be done in the broader scientific community yet
that leverages that broader national resource.
Nesting helps bridge the gap between the broader scientific community and theresearch that only Army RDECs are likely to conduct.
Consider, for example, research into tactical marksmanship that is addressed in the
category of biomechanics lab task 3.4.2 aiming as opposed to competition
marksmanship or typical marksmanship training in the Army. One of the citations in thiscategory (Palmer, Riccio, & van Emmerik, 2012) is a laboratory experiment in which
landing (jumping from a height of 24 inches) was combined with postural stability
(maintenance of bipedal stance) and dynamic visual acuity (maintenance of gaze on a
point of regard). The study built on a solid foundation in various independent lines of
research. While the research was motivated by the needs of NSRDEC, it is not the kind of
research that typically would be conducted in academe.
With an eye toward the needs of NSRDEC, Palmers work reveals that exceedingly
practical issues can be addressed with scientific rigor and in an academic laboratory with
the influence of NSRDEC. Practical questions go beyond how much shock is transmitted
to various parts of the body as perturbations (i.e., unintended motion and altered
mobility) and for how long after landing. They address whether the amplitude,
distribution, and duration of perturbations has consequences for tasks that must be
performed by a Soldier, such as aiming a rifle and making a shoot/no-shoot decision.
Time scales and error have meaning in such this kind of research; they are not arbitrary.
Inability to think and act in a specific time frame with a specific level of performance has
lethal consequences (for oneself or someone else). The mobility involved in postural
transitions and support of perception and nested action systems has consequences for
lethality and survivability. They are thoroughly intertwined as any experienced Soldierknows. Moreover, the nesting of tasks in Palmers work provided new insight into the
consequences of Soldier load. In particular, asymmetry of load emerged as the most
important factor influencing performance even in elite shooters. More generally, the
reason for trandisciplinary research is to facilitate transition of science to technical,
operational, or programmatic solutions and this often has simultaneous implications for
materiel development and training (McDonald, Riccio, & Newman, 1999).
Nesting of tasks enables one to transform expedient measures of performance in one
domain or another and combine them in ways that reveal tangible outcomes. For example,
a frequency spectrum of vibration transmitted from foot to the head, combined with a
frequency spectrum of compensatory capabilities of the head-neck system or the
oculomotor system, combined with contrast reduction as a function of the frequencyspectrum of retinal slip, combined visual detection time as a function of contrast
reduction, combined the time it takes to decide to shoot or not shoot provides indications
about operational effectiveness that are concrete if not binary (life or death) but also may
have strategic implications. This is an example of what it means to analyze the Soldier as
a system (cf., Riccio, McDonald, & Bloomberg, 1999).
8/12/2019 Consilience in Situated Physical Ergonomics
18/28
Riccio, 10AUG2012 Consilience
17
Often the esoteric units of measurement utilized in analyzing components of a
system either cancel out or combine in some way that is much simpler than the
component parts. This is common in engineering and often the point of it.
In the biomechanics section of the library as in the cognitive science section, core and
secondary processes differentiate behavioral-experiential categories that are more
relevant or more directly relevant to a particular PI from those that are less so. Secondaryprocesses are not unimportant or irrelevant; they are just less so than core processes. A
behavioral-experiential category (e.g., 4.3 affordances/effectivities) that is a secondary
process for one PI (e.g., develop a plan for search and attack) can be a core process for
another PI (e.g., dynamic replanning of load in establishing a traffic control point).
In the biomechanics library, it generally is the case the core and secondary processes are
nested either concurrently or sequentially. This fact is utilized in the section of the library
on biomechanical measures to draw attention to highly relevant transdisciplinary
connections. To simplify this implication in this section of the library, the rows always
specify only one core process and one associated secondary process. Typically this
association is explicitly addressed in the research that is cited in the same row. There are
many more opportunities for transdisciplinary research into the nesting of differentbehavioral-experiential categories in every row of the library. These opportunities for
paradigmatic innovation are highlighted in the cross-references column for each
behavioral-experiential category and to some extent in the descriptions for each
category. Future innovations that realize this potential would be accommodated in the
library as additional rows with classification in terms of i.j.k-l.m.n. Similarly the library
can accommodate additional rows for particular laboratory tasks that are extant and
represented in the citations already in the library (e.g., at the level of i.j.k-l.m). In either
case, tasks at the level of ncould be given a name (e.g., the Palmer task for tactical
marksmanship). Tasks (rows) at higher levels in the biomechanics library dont require a
name because they generally are not tasks created for scientific purposes and unique to
science. They are common tasks that Soldiers and others perform on the job or in daily
life, thus, the common words for those tasks or activities are used.
The library has been designed for extensibility so it can both stimulate and accommodate
future innovation in science for Soldiers. In the biomechanics library, we explored use of
several additional columns to suggest modifications of existing research and to do so in
some systematic way that could be applied iteratively to any task (row) in the library. The
thinking behind these exploratory columns and the extensibility they promote is
highlighted below:
"Workload/Effort/Endurance" refers to cognitive and physiological limits onperformance in complex or time-consuming tasks
"Stability" refers to the ability to maintain or persist in some set of states or
configurations "Equilibrium" refers to a preferred set of states or configurations (i.e., an
objective)
"Flow" refers to something that persists over changes in other aspects of a
situation
"Transition" refers to essential (purposeful) change as opposed to incidental
change (e.g., perturbations)
8/12/2019 Consilience in Situated Physical Ergonomics
19/28
Riccio, 10AUG2012 Consilience
18
Nesting refers to transformation in an ontological category (i.e., nesting
changes the fundamental unit of analysis)
Epistemological refers to transformation in an epistemological category with
invariance in ontological category (e.g., use of kinetics measures instead ofkinematics measures)
Scale refers to transformation of scale with invariance in the epistemologicalcategory (e.g., time scale or spatial scale)
Parameterization refers to transformation in the structure of the parameter set
used for measurement with invariance in the epistemological category (e.g., 3d
instead of 2d, depth instead of breadth)
Team refers to task changes that can address team behavior or processes
instead of or in addition to the behavior of individuals
Transdisciplinary implications refers to the relevance and potential impact of
research at NSRDEC on other Army laboratories and disciplines
Materiel implications and constraints refers to the relevance and potentialimpact of research at NSRDEC on Army acquisitions programs of record
Nonmateriel implications and constraints refers to the relevance and potential
impact of research at NSRDEC on Army training and education
As an example of how these dimensions of extensibility can be utilized, entries in all
these columns are provided for the following behavioral-experiential categories:
1.1.1-1.2 Elastic storage (Running)
1.1.1-2.3 Cutting (Running)
1.1.1-3.5 Spatially constrained (Running)
3.4.2 Aiming
4.4.2 Kinematics-constrained reasoning
5.2.3 Use of Sensory Accessories
We believe these dimensions of extensibility will provide useful guidance in discoveringopportunities for paradigmatic innovation in the juxtaposition of cognitive and
biomechanics laboratory tasks because of their parallel mapping to PI (Figure 6). This
parallel mapping should be viewed from the perspective of integration and reciprocal
influence (i.e., transdisciplinary science) as opposed to analogy or coincidence of interest
(Rosenfield, 1992; Stokols et al., 2003). For example, the periodic table of behavioral-
experiential elements can be a source of guidance for general experimental conditions
that reveal or promote transition. It also can be a source of independent variables or
covariates in experiments in the social and cognitive sciences. The relevance of
laboratory research in the social and cognitive sciences thus can become more salient and,
in any case, better defined with respect to this periodic table of elements that are
observable either behaviorally, experientially, or both.
Finally, an initial conclusion from our work is that embodied cognitioncan be a fruitful
area of transdisciplinary research at NSRDEC (e.g., Anderson, 2003; Wilson, 2002).
Embodied cognition is in a separate block of the behavioral-experimental periodic table
(4. Nested Perception or Cognition). It should be noted that this and other behavioral-
experiential elements in this block often are designated as secondary processes in the
library and only rarely as core processes. This is because, in principle, embodied
cognition can be coupled with every other element in the periodic table. It reflects the
simple fact that Soldiers are thinking beings, and they always have been even before the
8/12/2019 Consilience in Situated Physical Ergonomics
20/28
Riccio, 10AUG2012 Consilience
19
21stcentury Soldier competencies became a high priority. What Soldiers know or believe
about themselves and their teammates influences what they do and what they plan to do.
As indicated above (section 1), self-knowledge is critical to decisions made in the
moment that can have immediate life and death consequences. Knowledge of ones own
capabilities and those of others is invaluable in planning, and the consequences are
important even though they are delayed.
In particular, there seem to be many useful connections between the research in embodied
cognition and the design and use of a load-planning tool (LPT). We believe they can
inform each other. The data and models utilized in an LPT are a small subset of the
constraints on locomotion, not to mention human movement in general, that are
addressed in the research cited in the biomechanics library. The lists of PI for Squad-critical tasks and the 72-hour scenario indicate the relevance of the biomechanics
research and what Soldiers would do with such information about constraints on action.
The cognitive library essentially indicates the cognitive processes that Soldiers can bring
to bear on the acquisition and use of information about constraints on action in the
context of particular PI. A deeper understanding of these transdisciplinary connections
could lead to a leap ahead in the sophistication of an LPT and its use. Even if some
connections were not exploited in an LPT, they almost certainly would have relevance totraining.
The transdisciplinary library, and the mapping between Squad-level tasks and
scientific paradigms, represents knowledge that highly experienced Soldiers
should have when they have mastered their craft. Formative measures that
help assess and improve this knowledge should be a priority. In other words,
training and education must be integrated and developed with capabilities
provided by technology.
References
Anderson, M.L. (2003). Field Review Embodied Cognition: A field guide.ArtificialIntelligence, 149, 91130.
Aptima (2012, July). Report to the U.S. Army Natick Soldier Research, Development and
Engineering Center. Woburn, MA: Aptima, Inc.
Flyvberg, B. (2001).Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it
can
succeed again. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.
Hamaoui, J. (2011, January). Colab: A model for accelerated solutions. Paper presented
at the NHHPC Workshop on Collaborative Innovation: Strategies and Best Practices.
Houston, TX: NASA Human Health and Performance Center.http://www.nasa.gov/offices/NHHPC/media/201101-NHHPC-Workshop-Hamaoui.html
Msse, L. C., Moser, R. P., Stokols, D., Taylor, B. K., Marcus, S. E., Morgan, G. D., Hall,
K.L., Croyle, R.T., Trochim, W. (2008). Measuring Collaboration and Transdisciplinary
Integration in Team Science.American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35(2,
Supplement 1), S151-S160.
8/12/2019 Consilience in Situated Physical Ergonomics
21/28
Riccio, 10AUG2012 Consilience
20
McDonald, P.V., Riccio, G.E., & Newman, D. (1999). Understanding skill in EVA mass
handling: Part IV: An integrated methodology for evaluating space suit mobility and
stability.NASA Technical Paper 3684. Lyndon B.Johnson Space Center, Houston TX.
Newell, K. (2007). Kinesiology: challenges of multiple agendas. Quest, 59, 5-24.
Palmer, C.J., Riccio, G.E., & van Emmerik, R.E.A. (2012). Orienting under load:Intrinsic dynamics and postural affordances for visual perception.Ecological Psychology,
24(2), 95-121.
Quinlan, K. M., Kane, M., & Trochim, W. M. K. (2008). Evaluation of large research
initiatives: Outcomes, challenges, and methodological considerations. In C. L. S. Coryn& M. Scriven (Eds.),Reforming the evaluation of research: New directions for
evaluation, 118, 6172.
Riccio, G. (1993/1997).Multimodal perception and multicriterion control of nested
systems: Self motion in real and virtual environments. (UIUC-BIHPP-93-02).
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign: Beckman Institute for Advanced Science &
Technology (Part I reprinted in Riccio & McDonald, 1997, NASA Technical Paper series3703).
Riccio, G., Diedrich, F., & Cortes, M. (Eds.).An Initiative in Outcomes-Based Training
and Education: Implications for an Integrated Approach to Values-Based Requirements
(Chapter 3). Fort Meade, MD: U.S. Army Asymmetric Warfare Group.
Riccio, G., & McDonald, P. & Bloomberg, J. (1999).Multimodal perception and
multicriterion control of nested systems: III. A functional visual assessment test for
human health maintenance and countermeasures, NASA/TP-1999-3703c, Johnson Space
Center, Houston, TX.
Rosenfield, P. L. (1992). The potential of transdisciplinary research for sustaining andextending linkages between the health and social sciences. Social Science and Medicine,
35, 13431357.
Stokols, D., Fuqua, J., Gress, J., Harvey, R., Phillips, K., Baezconde-Garbanati, L., et al.
(2003). Evaluating transdisciplinary science.Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 5, S-1,
S21S39.
Trochim. W., Marcus, S.E., Msse, L.C., Moser, R.P., Weld, P. (2008). The evaluation of
large research initiatives: A participatory integrative mixed-methods approach,American
Journal of Evaluation, 29, 1, 8-28.
Wenger, Etienne (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,
9(4), 625-636.
8/12/2019 Consilience in Situated Physical Ergonomics
22/28
Core BiomechanicalProcesses
Secondary BiomechanicalProcesses
Specific Component ofConstruct Measured
Detailed Description (Lab Task and Materials)Citation (Containing Task Explanation)
1. Move over, through, around
1.1 Locomotion
1.1-1 Movement in General Individual MovementTechniques and SpecificMilitary Maneuvers
Operationally, the section in HQDA (2008) on "Individual Movement Techniques"is most relevant to identification of critical biomechanical issues. With rapiddevelopments in instrumentation, obstacle courses are potentially a viable,reliable, and replicable test bed for "research in the wild."
Technically, if we are to take "Soldier as a System" seriously and specifically interms of a dynamical system, it behooves us to consider and adapt the broadestrange of mature transdisciplinary research on human perception and control ofdynamical systems (e.g., Riccio, 1993/1997). The implications of such researchfor systems design and training will be a rich source of innovation that canaccommodate quantitative and qualitative verification and validation ofassessment methods as well as materiel and nonmateriel capabilities [e.g.,1.1.1-2 Natural Variations].
HQDA (2008). Movement. In: FM 3-21.75: The Warrior Ethos and Soldier Combat Skills (Chapter 7). Washington DC:HQDA.
Frykman, P.N., Harman, E.A., & Pandorf, C.E. (2000). Correlates of obstacle course performance among female soldiers
carrying two different loads. DTIC ADP010994. Natick, MA: U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine.
LaFiandra, M., Lynch, S., Frykman, P., Everett Harman, E., Ramos, H., & Mello, R. (2003). A comparison of twocommercial off the shelf backpacks to the Modular Lightweight Load Carrying Equipment (MOLLE) in biomechanics,metabolic cost and performance. T03-15. Natick, MA: U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine.
Riccio, G. (1993/1997). Multimodal perception and multicriterion control of nested systems: Self motion in real andvirtual environments. (UIUC-BIHPP-93-02). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign: Beckman Institute forAdvanced Science & Technology (reprinted in Riccio & McDonald, 1997, NASA Technical Paper series 3703).
1.1-2 Support SurfaceDynamics
4.3.1 PerceiveObjects/Surroundings
Rheology and Terramechanics Perception and control of movement cannot be understood, in principle, withoutconsidering interaction between the moving system and the substrate on whichit moves. Classic references are:* Scott Blair, G.W. (1944). A survey of general and applied rheology. New York:Pitman.* Bekker, M.G. (1956). Theory of land locomotion: The mechanics of vehiclemobility. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.* Muro, T., & O'Brien, J. (1984). Terramechanics: Land locomotion mechanics.Lisse, NL: Swets & Zeitlinger.* Nigg, B.M. (1986). Biomechanics of running shoes. Champaign, IL: HumanKinetics.
Stoffregen, T.A., & Riccio, G.E. (1988). An ecological theory of orientation and the vestibular system. PsychologicalReview, 95(1), 3-14.
Ding, Y., Gravis, N., Li, C., Maladen, R.D., Mazouchova, N., Sharpe, S.S., Umbahnowar, P.B., & Goldman, D.I. (2012).Comparative studies reveal principles of movement on and within granular media. In: S. Childress, Hosoi, A., Schults,W.W., & Wang, Z. (Eds.) !Natural Locomotion in Fluids and on Surfaces: Swimming, Flying, and Sliding"(Volume 155 ofthe IMA Volumes in Mathematics and its Applications). Springer.
1.1.1 Running
1.1.1-1 General Properties 1.1.2 Walking Running typically is assessed in the laboratory using constant velocity treadmilllocomotion. Overground locomotion requires different kinds of instrumentationand analyses, and these methodological capabilities are undergoing rapidscientific and technical innovation. "Fighting load" is more relevant than"approach load" [1.1-1 Movement in General] to assessment of "running" inSoldiers, although approach loads may lead to utilization of elastic-kineticenergy exchanges characteristic of running at lower speeds and without a flightphase [1.1.1-1.2 Elastic Storage].
1.1.1-1.1 Transmissibility 2.4.1 Self-Generated ReactiveForce
Energy exchange Shock absorption is an important aspect of whole-body dynamics (e.g.,musculoskeletal system and soft tissue) for a variety of reasons including injuryand fatigue, energy exchange, and stability of the platform for the visual
system (i.e., the head).
Vorbitsky, O., Mizrahi, J., Voloshin, A., Treiger, J., & Eli lsakov, E. (1998). Shock Transmission and Fatiguein Human Running. Journal of Applied Biomechanics, 14, 300-311.
Challis, J.H. & Pain, M.T.G. (2008). Soft tissue motion influences skeletal loads during impacts. Exercise and SportSciences Reviews, 36, 71-75
1.1.1-1.2 Elastic storage 2.4.1 Self-Generated ReactiveForce
Energy exchange The best distinction between walking and running is elastic vs. gravitationalpotential energy exchanges with kinetic energy of (generally forward) motion.Comparative biomechanics reveals that a flight phase is an incidental feature ofgaits utilizing elastic energy storage. Together with computer modeling,comparative biomechanics shows that altered morphology and body dynamicscan lead to a wider variety of stable gait patterns than just walking andrunning.
Cavagna, G.A., & Kaneko (1977). Mechanical work and energy in level walking and running. Journal of Physiology, 268,467-481.
Biknevicius, A. R., & Reilly, S.M. (2006). Correlation of symmetrical gaits and whole body mechanics: Debunking mythsin locomotor biodynamics. Journal of Experimental Zoology, 305A, 923-934.
Srinivasan, M. & Andy Ruina, A. (2006). Computer optimization of a minimal biped model discovers walking andrunning. Nature, 439(5), 72-75.
1.1.1-1.3 PulmonaryVentilation
5.1.2 Coordinated Breathing Coordination Coordination between the overlapping musculoskeletal systems involved inrespiration and locomotion is a skill, however mundane, that can improve withtargeted training especially in unusual conditions. This is an everyday skill thattakes on relatively greater importance when expansion of the thoracic cavity isconstrained.
McDermott, W.J., Van Emmerik, R.E.A. Hamill, J. (2003). Running training and adaptive strategies of locomotor-respiratory coordination. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 89, 435-444.
Bernasconi, P. & Kohl, J. (1993). Analysis of co-ordination between breathing and exercise rhythms in man. Journal ofPhysiology, 471, 693-706.
1. 1.1- 1. 4 Sp rin t/R us h 2. 4.1 En er gy Ab sor pti on S peed In hig h-s pe ed tr avel un der load , a key co nsi der ati on is th e fo rces on th emusculoskeletal system upon footfall. Physical fitness enables higher-speedlocomotion (rush). It is an empirical question whether fitness, and what kind,leads to more effective (coordinated) energy absorption and transfer.
Blount, E.M., Tolk, A., & Ringleb, S.I. (2010, April). Physical Fitness for Tactical Success. Paper presented at the VMASCStudent Capstone Conference; Virginia Modeling, Analysis and Simulation Center, Old Dominion University, Suffolk, VA.
Chumanov, E.S., Heiderscheit, B.C., & Thelen, D.G. (2011). Hamstring musculotendon dynamics during stance andswing phases of high speed running. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 43(3), 525532.
1 .1 .1 -1 .5 Endura nc e 1 .1 .2 -1 .5 Endura nc e Ene rgy e xc ha nge Injury bi om ec ha ni cs is an im po rt an t s ourc e o f i nf orma ti on pe rt ai ni ng toendurance. Comparative biomechanics also can be insightful to the extent thatexcessive weight and bulk essentially turns the human into a different speciesbiomechanically.
Hoskins, W. (2012). Low back pain and injury in athletes. In: Y. Sakai (Ed.), Low back pain pathogenesis and treatment(pp. 41-68). Rijeka, Croatia: InTech.
Bramble, D.M. & Lieberman, D.E (2004). Endurance running and the evolution of Homo. Nature, 432(18), 345-352.
1.1.1-1.6 Spatiotemporalrange
4.3.1 Perceive Surroundings Traversability Research on orienteering, obstacle courses, and combined athletic events are agood source for guidance on how to conceptualize and measure this capability.
Mullins, N. (2012). Obstacle course challenges: History, popularity, performance demands, effective training, andcourse design. Journal of Exercise Physiology, 15(2), 100-128.
Alonso, J.-M., Edouard, P., Fischetto, G., Adams, B., Depiesse, F., & Mountjoy, M. (2012). Determination of future
prevention strategies in elite track and field: analysis of Daegu 2011 IAAF Championships injuries and illnessessurveillance. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 46, 505514.
1.1.1-2 Natural Variations 1.1-2 Support SurfaceDynamics
Consider developing a methodology analogous to the Cooper-Harper ratingscale that is used to assess the "handling qualities" of vehicles. Assess handlingqualities for a particular behavioral-experiential category ("biomechanicalprocess) at least at the three-number level [e.g., 1.1.1 running vice 1.1.2walking] under a small set of well-specified conditions and maneuvers that canbe characterized and verified quantitatively [e.g., 1.1-1 Movement in General].This would allow for specification of a performance envelope for eachbiomechanical process.
Cooper, G.E., & Harper, R.P. (1969). The use of pilot rating in the evaluation of aircraft handling qualities. AGARD-NATOReport 567. Neuilly-sur-Seine Cedex, France: Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development.
Research and Technology Organisation North Atlantic Treaty Organization (2002). Collaboration for land, air, sea, andspace vehicles: Developing the common ground in vehicle dynamics, system identification, control, and handlingqualities. France: Research and Technology Organization North Atlantic Treaty Organisation.
1. 1.1- 2. 1 Acc eler ati on 1. 1.2 Wal kin g A ccel era tio n Th e mo st imp or ta nt co nsid er ati on s for ch an ges in sp eed ar e ga it tr an sit io nsbetween running and walking because they are intimately linked to energyexpenditure, stability, and effectivities (e.g., terrain that can be traversed withone gait pattern or another).
Segers, V, Lenoir, M., Aerts P., De Clercq, D. (2007). Influence of M. tibialis anterior fatigue on the walk-to-run and run-to-walk transition in non-steady state locomotion, Gait Posture, 25(4), 639-647.
Sasaki, K. & Neptune, R.R. (2006). Muscle mechanical work and elastic energy utilization during walking and runningnear the preferred gait transition speed. Gait & Posture, 23, 383390.
1 .1 .1 -2 .2 Brak ing (s to pp ing) 2 .2 .1 Upr ight S ta nc e B ra ki ng B eyond the cr it ic al i ss ue s pe rt ai ni ng t o rheo lo gi ca l c ha ra ct er is ti cs o f the fo ot -ground interface, that also are common in turning, the most important issues inbraking pertain to perception and control of time to contact with an object ormilestone in the surroundings and establishing stable postural control for thenext activity in the sequence.
Lee, D.N. (1980). The optical flow field: The foundation of vision. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society ofLondon B, 290 (1038), 169-178.
Fajen, B.R. (2005). Calibration, information, and control strategies for braking to avoid a collision. Journal ofExperimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(3), 480501.
1.1.1-2.3 Cutting 2.2.2 Leaning Cutting Because of technological limitations of the laboratory, historically, almost allstudies of human locomotion have involved motion in a straight line. Changes indirection are ubiquitous, however, in natural environments and the activities ofdaily living as well as in occupational and recreational activities. Changes indirection reveal the sophisticated control required to coordinate balance withpropulsion, the critical importance of foot morphology and shoe design, and therequirement to consider support-surface characteristics in an externally validanalysis of locomotion.
Kuntze, G., Sellers, W.I, & Mansfield, N.J. (2009). Bilateral ground reaction forces and joint moments for lateralsidestepping and crossover stepping tasks. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 8, 1-8.
Wannop, J.W., Worobets, J.T. and Stefanyshyn, D.J. (2010) Footwear traction and lower extremity joint loading.American Journal of Sport Medicine, Vol. 38(6), 1221-1228.
Riccio, G. (1993/1997). Multimodal perception and multicriterion control of nested systems: Self motion in real andvirtual environments. (UIUC-BIHPP-93-02). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign: Beckman Institute forAdvanced Science & Technology (reprinted in Riccio & McDonald, 1997, NASA Technical Paper series 3703).
1.1.1-3 Challenging Terrain
1.1.1-3.1 Inclined/Declinedsurfaces
4 .1 .2 Feet (Hapt ics) Traversabil ity Uphil l locomot ion i s qua li ta tive ly di fferent f rom locomot ion on level groundbecause a significant percentage of gravitational potential energy (e.g., in loadcarried) is not returned for immediate use as translational kinetic energy.Gravitational potential cannot be utilized extensively during downhill locomotionbecause of limits on eccentric muscle loading, elastic energy storage, andviscoelastic dissipation of energy.
Gottschall, J.S., & Kram, R. (2005).Ground reaction forces during downhill and uphill running. Journal of Biomechanics,38, 445452.
Mizrahi, J., Verbitsky, O., & Isakov, E. (2001). Fatigue-induced changes in decline running. Clinical Biomechanics, 16,207-212.
1 .1 .1-3 .2 Compliant surfaces 4 .1 .2 Feet (Haptics) Traversabil ity Consider the body-surface system as a fundamenta l uni t o f ana lysis. Analyzebody and surface in commensurable terms enabling relational constructs suchas impedance matching.
Ferris, D.P., Louie, M., & Farley, C.T. (1998). Running in the real world: adjusting leg stiffness for different surfaces.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 265, 989-994.
McMahon, T.A. & Greene, P.R. (1979). The influence of track compliance on running. Journal of Biomechanics, 12, pp.893-904.
1 .1 .1-3 .3 Sl ippery surfaces 4 .1 .2 Feet (Haptics) Traversabil ity The phys ical sc iences associated wi th so il mechanics (e.g. rheo logy, t ribo logy)are a valuable partner in the study of locomotion outside the laboratory.Robotics also can provide a valuable test bed for modeling and analysis ofconstraints and characteristics of locomotion on surfaces outside the laboratory.
Guisasola, I., James, L., Llewellyn, C., Bartlett, M., Stiles, V., & Dixon S. (2009). Human-surface interactions: anintegrated study. International Turfgrass Society Research Journal, 11, 1097-1106.
Qian, F., Zhang, T., Li, C., et al. (2012, July). Walking and running on yielding and fluidizing ground. Paper presented at2012 Robotics: Systems and Science. University of Sydney, Sydney NSW Australia. Retrieved fromhttp://www.roboticsproceedings.org/rss08/index.html
Appendix. Biomechanics Library
A-1
8/12/2019 Consilience in Situated Physical Ergonomics
23/28
1.1 .1-3 .4 Uneven surfaces 4 .1 .2 Feet (Haptics) Traversabil ity For la rge discont inui ties that require s tr id ing, there may be ins ights f rom theextensive body of research on end-point control although there are importantnuances in the requirements for controlling the direction of the thrust vectorupon contact. For small discontinuities, stability of the ankle joint will berelatively important and haptic sensitivity will be important on correspondinglyshorter time scales.
Daley, M.A., & Usherwood, J.R. (2010). Two explanations for the compliant running paradox: reduced work of bouncingviscera and increased stability in uneven terrain. Biological Letters, 6, 418-421.
van der Krogt, M.A., de Graaf, W.W., Farley, C.T., Moritz, C.T., Casius, L.J.R., & and Maarten F. Bobbert, M.F. (2009).Robust passive dynamics of the musculoskeletal system compensate for unexpected surface changes during humanhopping. Journal of Applied Physiology, 107, 801808.
. . . . . .1.1.1-3.5 Spatiallyconstrained
1.1.1-4.2 Torso perturbations Traversability "Four dimensional" (4d) terrain considers apertures (e.g., windows, doors,partial enclosures), passageways (e.g., paths, hallways), obstacles (e.g.,furniture, clutter, vegetation, outcroppings), and barriers (e.g., walls,fortifications) as constraints on traversability that alter the manner and speedwith which a space can be traversed. 4d terrain brings time into the threecardinal dimensions of space but as an outcome rather than as a causal variable(e.g., as is typically the case in physics). The layout of a building interior, forexample, has a significant impact on entering and clearing a room. There is adearth of research in this area but a growing body of related research on semi-autonomous robots, teleoperation, games, as well as human navigation andspatial perception.
Roy, T.C., Springer, B.A., McNulty, V., Butler, N.L. (2010). Physical fitness. Military Medicine, 175(8), 14-96.
Maguire, E.A., Neil Burgess, N., James G. Donnett, J.G., Frackowiak, R.S.J., Frith, C.D., OKeefe, J. (1998). Knowingwhere and getting there: A human navigation network. Science, 280, 921-924.
Takayama, L., Marder-Eppstein, E., Harri s, H., & Beer, J. M. (2011). Assisted driving of a mobile remote presencesystem: System design and controlled user evaluation. Proceedings of International Conference on Robotics andAutomation. 1883-1889.
1.1.1-4 DisturbanceRegulation
4. 3.2 Pe rceiv e Self S tab il ity An ex ten siv e b od y of wo rk on hu ma n con tr ol of ph ysi cal sy stems can pr ov ide asource of innovation and insight in the study of human control of pedallocomotion. The relatively rapidly increasing body of literature on nonlinear
control should be considered as well as work in linear and quasi-linear control.
Ghigliazza, R.M., Altendorfer, R., Holmes, P., Koditschek, D. (2005). A Simply Stabilized Running Model. SIAM Review,47(3), 519549.
Riccio, G. (1993/1997). Multimodal perception and multicriterion control of nested systems: Self motion in real andvirtual environments. (UIUC-BIHPP-93-02). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign: Beckman Institute forAdvanced Science & Technology (reprinted in Riccio & McDonald, 1997, NASA Technical Paper series 3703).
1.1.1-4.1 Leg/footperturbations
2 .2 .1 Up ri gh t S ta nc e S ta bi li ty Pe rt urba ti ons c an be rel at ivel y s us ta ined change s i n dynam ic s s uc h a s runni ngthrough thick brush or water, or with exoskeletons or other loads on the legs.Perturbations also can be momentary disturbances such as a tripping hazard.
Haudum, A., Birklbauer, J., Krll, J., & Mller, E. (2012). Constraint-led changes in internal variability in running. Journalof Sports Science and Medicine, 11, 8-15.
Seay, J.F., Haddad, J.M., van Emmerik, R.E.A.,& Hamill, J, (2006). Coordination Variability Around the Walk to RunTransition During Human Locomotion. Motor Control, 10, 178196.
1 .1 .1-4 .2 Torso perturbat ions 2 .2 .1 Upright Stance Stabi li ty Perturbat ions can be relat ively susta ined changes in dynamics such as runningthrough thick brush, or with exoskeletons, or other loads on the torso or limbs.Perturbations also can be momentary disturbances such as a shift in load orasymmetrical load that creates cross-coupling forces due to the moment-of-inertia tensor and potentially destabilizing coriolis motions at the head, althoughresearch is needed in this area.
Pontzer, H., Holloway, J.H., Raichlen, D.A., & Lieberman, D.E. (2009). Control and function of arm swing in humanwalking and running. The Journal of Experimental Biology 212, 523-534.
Willems, P.A., Cavagna, G.A., & Heglund, N.C. (1995). External, internal, and total work in human locomotion. TheJournal of Experimental Biology, 198, 379393.
1.1.1-4.3 Opticalperturbations
2 .2 .1 Up ri gh t S ta nc e S ta bi li ty Opt ic al in fo rm at io n ( e. g., fl ow fi el ds ) p la y a n i mpor ta nt ro le in the c ontrol oflocomotion but it is not sufficient. Intermodal invariants are required todisambiguate different causes of motion and to coordinate the multiple degreesof freedom involved in the control of human movement (multi-input/multi-output or MIMO control). Proprioceptive systems are utilized along with visualand vestibular systems to pick up information in intermodal invariants.
Riccio, G. (1993/1997). Multimodal perception and multicriterion control of nested systems: Self motion in real andvirtual environments. (UIUC-BIHPP-93-02). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign: Beckman Institute forAdvanced Science & Technology (reprinted in Riccio & McDonald, 1997, NASA Technical Paper series 3703).
Warren, W.H. (1998). Perception of heading is a brain in the neck. Nature: Neuroscience, 1(8), 647-649.
1.1.1-5 Target Following 4.3.1 PerceiveObjects/Surroundings
Trac ki ng A n e xt ensi ve body of wo rk on huma n c ontrol of phys ic al syst em s c an prov ide asource of innovation and insight in the study of human control of pedallocomotion. There is a principled and utilitarian distinction between targetfollowing and disturbance regulation in this literature.
Baron, S. (1979). A brief overview of the theory and application of the optimal control model of the human operator.Unpublished manuscript. Cambridge, MA: Bolt, Beranek, & Newman.
Jex, H.R., Magdaleno, R.E., Jewell. W.F., Junker, A., & McMillan, G. (1981). Effects of target tracking motion simulatordrive-logic filters. AFAMRL-TR-80-134. WPAFB, OH: Air Force Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory.
1.1.1-5.1 Target acquisition 5.4.1 Approach Target acquisition/interception Trajectories of interception assume or otherwise are constrained by thedynamics of locomotor systems which include the support surface dynamics andlayout as well as the body and any carried load.
Warren, W.H., & Fajen, B.R. (2007). Behavioral dynamics of intercepting a moving target. Experimental Brain Research,180, 303319.
Shaffer, D.M., & Gregory, T.B. (2009). How football flayers determine where to run to tackle other players: A
mathematical and psychological description and analysis. The Open Sports Sciences Journal, 2, 29-36.
1.1.1-5.2 Unit cohesion 5.4.3 Maintain Distance Relative object motion Interpersonal coordination dynamics is a relative new area of research.Research on team sports is useful source of innovation for studying unitcohesion especially through a dynamical systems approach in which there is thepromise of commensurability in modeling the constraints of load and its effectson human movement.
Passos, P., Arajo, D., Keith Davids, K., Gouveia, L., Serpa, S. (2006). Interpersonal dynamics in sport: The role ofartificial neural networks and 3-D analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 38(4), 683-691.
Davids, K., Button, C., Arajo, D., Renshaw, I., & Hristovski, R. (2006). Movement Models from Sports ProvideRepresentative Task Constraints for Studying Adaptive Behavior in Human Movement Systems. Adaptive Behavior,14(1), 7395.
1.1.1-5.3 Dynamic visualacuity
4.1.2 Eye movements Dynamic visual acuity Perturbations to the head during locomotion present a challenge to the visualsystem. Imperfect compensation for such perturbations by the oculomotor andhead-neck system lead to blur of the retinal image that in many ways is likeblur due to optical imperfections in the lens of the eye. Dynamic visual acuitythus can be assessed with optometric methods analogous to those used inconventional eye examinations. Modifications to such methods can be designedto address uniquely biomechanical patterns of blur such as asymmetry.
Riccio, G., & McDonald, P. & Bloomberg, J. (1999). Multimodal Perception and Multicriterion Control of Nested Systems:III. A Functional Visual Assessment Test for Human Health Maintenance and Countermeasures, NASA/TP-1999-3703c,Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX.
Joseph L. Demer, J. & Firooz Amjadi, F. (1993). Dynamic visual acuity of normal subjects during vertical optotype andhead motion. Investiga