Conservation Proposal

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/6/2019 Conservation Proposal

    1/6

    Conservation Proposal: Boiga

    Irregularis

    Alana Alameida, Shraddha Sharma, Puneet

    Sirapanyawuth

  • 8/6/2019 Conservation Proposal

    2/6

    Justification

    The Brown Tree Snake (BTS) is an invasive species that has had a large impact on the ecosystem of Guam. After

    World War II, the species was accidently transported to Guam, most likely as a cargo stowaway, and since then the

    Melanesian snake has been a hassle for the fauna and humans living on Guam. Due to no natural predators and an

    abundance of prey, the BTS population has exploded, and they are the cause of multiple electrical outages,

    envenoming of children, and most particularly the extinction of native birds and lizards.

    Supporting Data

    As seen in Appendix A, the graph shows population densities of several bird species native in Guam per 100km. It is

    easy to note that almost all graphs are declining; the population of these species are decreasing throughout theyears. All of these species have been affected by the BTS. The Guam Rail is a particularly hard hit species that has

    been extinct naturally ever since the 1980s, but they, along with Micronesian Kingfishers, are currently being bred in

    captivity to be released into the wild. Of interesting note are the Yellow Bitterns and the Eurasian Tree Sparrows,

    whose population have not completely declined. These two speciesmove in between different habitats, the Bitterns

    in swampy areas and grasslands, while the Sparrows have survived well in urban areas. These kinds of habitats are

    limited in BTS numbers, thus allowing for the populations to rise due to adaptation. Appendix B is a complete species

    summary table of all species affected by the BTS.

    Not only do the snakes cause natural disturbances, but they cost the Guam governmentan estimated millions of

    dollars each year. Brown Tree Snakes often climb on top of manmade structures, and up power poles supporting

    distribution wires and transmission lines. Contact with these conductors can cause faults and short circuits. In the

    year 1982 alone, snakes caused 84 electrical faults, accounting for 252 hours of power outages on the island.Appendix C shows the frequency of electrical outages due to snakes throughout the years of 1978-1997. By the year

    1996, there were roughly 215 outages or approximately one outage every other day.

    As of March 2009, there are 26,000 snakes per square mile. Guam is 212 square miles large. Thats 5,512,000 snakes

    on the island, and compared to the 177,718 humans living on Guam, thats a ratio ofapproximately 31 snakes to 1

    person. It is clear that the BTS situation on Guam is a dire one, with impacts on the islands ecology and biosphere.

    Humans are also affected in the damages of electric appliances and also fear of snakes attacking children.This

    conservation project aims to remedy these issues on Guam.

    Methodology

    As of this moment, there are no effective large-scale methods of controlling the BTS population.For urban areas and

    transportation lanes: hand, trap and dog-assisted capture are being used to individually root out snakes, as well asphysical barrier placement around electrical equipment and openings in buildings. These barriers, often electric,

    have proven somewhat effective in securing snake-free areas but do little to remove already populated zones.

    Appendix D is a summary table of BTS population control techniques, detailing which ones are in use and which ones

    require more research and development (R&D). As evident in the table, our two proposed solutions (chemical and

    biological control) require R&D which, in other words, is funds.

    Biological controls and bait-attractants have the potential to be cost-efficient and a long-term solution over a wide

    scale, but need more research before they can be implemented. Donald Nichols, a veterinary pathologist for the

    Guam National Zoo, is one of the main contributors to a new solution that may provide the answer to Guams

    problems. While working as a freelancer examining tissue from deceased animals in other zoos, he realized that

    many collections of snakes had suffered from paramyxovirus outbreaks.When infected with this, snakes exhibit flu-

    like symptoms that quickly lead to death. "Wouldnt it be nice," he thought to himself, "if there were aparamyxovirus outbreak on Guam?"

    KSV (king snake virus) and EEGV (Elpahe guttatavirus)arebothpromisingstrainsthatinfectsnakesandlaydormant

    forjustlongenoughtobespreadaroundbeforeitkillsitshost.Anotherdevelopmentistheuseofacetaminophen, a

    chemicalpresentinTylenol,whichwhenadministeredtobrowntreesnakeswillalsokillthem.Thedrugisputinto

    frozen,deadmicewhicharethenair-droppedandconnectedtospecificdeviceswhichcatchontrees justsothat

    brown treesnakescan reachandeat them,butotheranimalscannot.Forboth techniques, themainproblem in

    developmentisgettingthemtothesnakeswithoutharmingotherwildlife.Theyareinroughstagesofdevelopment,

    andifwereceivethefundingtocontinuetheseprojectswewillbedevisingmethodsofimplementingthemwithout

    causingundesiredeffects.Then,theBTSpopulationcouldfinallybedealtwith.

  • 8/6/2019 Conservation Proposal

    3/6

    Impact

    Iftheproposedsolutions,namelybiologicalcontrolsandbait-attractants,succeedindecreasingtheBTSpopulation,

    thepeopleandecosystemofGuamwillbehighlybenefited.Theproposed solutionsdonot include the localsof

    Guam as the public has already been educated about BTS and how to keep them out of their homes etc. The

    government of Guam highly encourages the locals to kill BTS upon sight. Though the project of involving locals

    requires expansionandR&D (see tableabove),we recognize thatother solutions, suchasbiologicalcontrol,are

    moreeffective.Therefore,itwouldbemostbeneficialtofundthosesolutions.

    As aforementioned, brown tree snakes in Guam are responsible fornumerous outages.Funding the proposed

    solutionswillresultinadecreaseintheBTSpopulation,andhencethenumberofoutagesaswell.Notonlydothese

    outagesserveasahugeinterferenceinpeopleslivesonGuam,italsocausesthegovernmenttolosevastamounts

    ofmoneyeachyear.IftheBTSpopulationwerecontrolled,thismoneycouldbeusedtobetterinfrastructureorto

    improvetheislandshealthcare,whichasaconsequence,wouldimprovethelivesofthoselivinginGuam.

    AlongwiththepositiveimpactsonthelocalpopulationofGuam,thewildlifeinGuamwouldalsobenefitifthefunds

    arecollectedtoresearchtheaforementionedproposedsolutions.Therailpopulationcouldberevivedandseveral

    otherendangeredspecieswouldno longerbeontheirwaytoextinction.Guamswildlifewouldfinallyhavesome

    sortoforder,orratherbalancetoit.

    Outcomes

    Tomonitor thesolutions thatwerepreviouslymentioned, therewouldneed tobeanestablishmentofscheduled

    checksofwhetherornotthepopulationofbrowntreesnakestobecontrolledtoalevelthatwillallowasustainable

    environment for the endangered animals that inhabit in the forests of Guam. A diverse amount of

    population/repopulationcontrolmethodsmustbeestablishedbecausemustbeusedtocontrolthepopulation.The

    determinationofwhen thisprojecthasmet itsgoalwillbewhen thepopulationofendangeredbirdsandnative

    Guam species start to increasewhichwouldmean that theexistenceofBTS inGuam isno longera threat to its

    biodiversity.AsetamountofbaitattractantneedstobecontrolledbytheamountofBTSinthearea,sothatthebait

    attractantsdonotpollute theenvironmentwith toxicchemicals.Also,somethingneeds tobedone tomakesure

    thatotheranimalsdonotingestthemiceasitwillleadtotheirdeath,andcouldaffecttheentirespeciesnegatively.

    The zoologists must ensure that money will not continue to flow into establishing the population control if the

    effortsarenotreturninginpositiveresults,becausethatwouldmeanthatmoneywillcontinuetobespentwithout

    anyresult.Thereshouldbeatimelimitofwhenthisprojectneedstobeeasedouttocontroltheamountoffunds

    thatareputintoit,orelsetoomuchmoneybeingspentonthiseffortcanresultinextranationalcostandincreasedtaxes.

    WehopethatwewillreceivefundsforthisprojectandfinallytheproblemsinGuamrelatingtoBTScanbesolved.

  • 8/6/2019 Conservation Proposal

    4/6

    App

    ndix

    A)

    B)Birds: Native

    Common Name Scientific Name Status on Guam

    Wedge-tailed shearwater Puffinus pacificus extirpated *

    White-tailed tropicbird Phaethon lepturus rare

    Yellow bittern Ixobrychus sinensis common in suitable habitats

    Pacific reef-heron Egretta sacra uncommon

    Mallard Anas platyrhynchos extirpated *

    Micronesian megapode Megapodius laperouse extirpated *

    Guam rail Rallus owstoniextirpated (currently reintroduced in awildlife enclosure)

    White-browed rail Poliolimnas cinereus extirpated *

    Common moorhen Gallinula chloropus rare

    Brown noody Anous stolidus rare

    White tern Gygis alba rare

    White-throated ground-dove Gallicolumba xanthonura extirpated

  • 8/6/2019 Conservation Proposal

    5/6

    Bi

    : I

    t

    S

    i

    tifi

    Stt

    Bl

    k f

    li

    Francolinus francolinus

    Bl

    t

    q

    il Coturni

    chinensis

    R

    j

    l

    f

    l Gallus

    allus

    R

    k

    Columba livia

    P!

    ili" "

    i

    t

    tl

    Streptopeliabitorquata

    Bl

    k

    Dicrurusmacrocercus

    E

    i

    t

    "

    Passermontanus

    !

    t

    t

    iki

    Lonchuramalacca

    Liz

    :

    ti

    S

    i

    tifi

    Stt

    S

    k

    #

    ki

    k Cryptoblepharuspoecilopleurus

    $

    ti

    " t

    %l

    t

    1969&

    Bl

    t

    il

    ki

    k Emoiacaeruleocauda

    %i

    f

    t

    &

    Az

    t

    il

    ki

    k Emoiacyanura

    $

    ti

    " t

    Sl

    i

    '

    ki

    k Emoiaslevini

    $

    ti

    " t

    %l

    t

    1945&

    '

    t

    !

    ki

    k Lipinianoctua

    '

    til

    ti

    k

    Gehyramutilata

    I

    l

    k

    Gehyraoceanica

    %

    l

    t

    1989&

    '

    i

    k Lepidodactylus lugubris

    R

    k

    k

    Nactuspelagicus

    '

    i

    i

    k Perochirusateles

    $

    ti

    " t

    %l

    t

    1978&

    Liz

    : I

    t

    S

    i

    tifi

    Stt

    l

    Anoliscarolinensis

    i

    ki

    k Carlia fusca

    H

    k Hemidactylus frenatus

    '

    it

    liz

    Varanus indicus

    '

    l

    S

    i

    tifi

    Stt

    P

    ifi

    !

    t

    ! t

    il

    t Embollonurasemicaudata

    $

    ti

    " t

    %l

    t

    1972&

    '

    i

    f

    it

    t Pteropusmariannus

    Littl

    i

    f

    it

    t Pteropus tokudae

    $

    ti

    " t

    %l

    t

    1968&

    (

    "

    t

    "

    i

    t!

    t

    ff

    t

    #f

    t

    lt

    t

    t!

    BTS

    Mariana fruit) 0 1 2

    3

    Ptilinopusroseicapilla4 5

    tirpat4

    6

    I7land

    7

    8

    iftl4

    t Aerodramus vanikorensis rare

    Mi9ronesian kingfisher Halcyoncinnamomina extirpated

    Mariana9row Corvuskubaryi rare

    @

    ightingalereed-warbler Acrocephalus luscinia extirpatedA

    uam flB

    9at

    9her Myiagra freycineti extirpated

    Rufous fantailC

    hipidurarufifrons extirpated

    Mi9

    ronesianstarling Aplonisopaca rareD

    ardinal honeyeater Myzomelacardinalis extirpated

    Bridledwhite-eye Zosteropsconspicillatus extirpated

  • 8/6/2019 Conservation Proposal

    6/6

    C)

    D)