17
Consensus sequences, showing conserved sites, may be represented in different ways

Consensus sequences, showing conserved sites, may be represented in different ways

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Consensus sequences, showing conserved sites, may be represented in different ways

Consensus sequences, showing conserved sites, may be represented in different ways

Page 2: Consensus sequences, showing conserved sites, may be represented in different ways

Differences between orthologous sequences suggest phylogenetic relationships

Tree calculated by comparing bacterial GroEL sequences

Page 3: Consensus sequences, showing conserved sites, may be represented in different ways

Figure 5-23

Different proteins have different sequence requirements and evolve at different rates

Page 4: Consensus sequences, showing conserved sites, may be represented in different ways

Figure 5-22

Differences between paralogous sequences predict gene duplication events

Page 5: Consensus sequences, showing conserved sites, may be represented in different ways

The connectivity of functional groups in the protein backbone directs its conformations

NN

NN

O

O

O

O

N

H

H

HR R

R R

NN

H

H

HH O

OR

R

Amide groups love to form H-bonds

R-group direction disfavors certain

conformations due to steric clashes

Page 6: Consensus sequences, showing conserved sites, may be represented in different ways

Pauling & Corey’s studies of oligopeptides revealed structural requirements of proteins

Page 7: Consensus sequences, showing conserved sites, may be represented in different ways

Figure 6-2

Structural studies of peptides revealed a planar amide group with a short C-N bond

Page 8: Consensus sequences, showing conserved sites, may be represented in different ways

Page 127

Resonance explains the double-bond character of the C-N amide bond

Page 9: Consensus sequences, showing conserved sites, may be represented in different ways

Figure 6-3

The protein backbone (main chain) is a connected series of peptide planes

Page 10: Consensus sequences, showing conserved sites, may be represented in different ways

Figure 6-4

Although fixed along the amide bond, the backbone may rotate about the other bonds

Dihedral angle: the angle between two planes

Page 11: Consensus sequences, showing conserved sites, may be represented in different ways

Looking down the C-X bond, the value of or increases as the rear group rotates CW

Page 12: Consensus sequences, showing conserved sites, may be represented in different ways

Some values of and correspond to overlap of atoms (steric clashes)

Ex: Backbone-backbone clash0, 180

Ex: Backbone-side chain clash120, 180

N

O

H

O

R

NH

C

H R

NH

CO

CO

Page 13: Consensus sequences, showing conserved sites, may be represented in different ways

Figure 6-6

The Ramachandran plot depicts favorable, allowed, and disallowed backbone angles

Page 14: Consensus sequences, showing conserved sites, may be represented in different ways

Pauling, Corey, and Herman Branson predicted the major secondary structures

They considered:• Planarity of peptide bond• Measured bond lengths and

angles within the peptide plane

• Allowed and dihedral angles

• Favorable hydrogen-bonding arrangements of backbone groups

Page 15: Consensus sequences, showing conserved sites, may be represented in different ways

The α-helix forms within a continuous strech of the polypeptide chain

5.4 Å rise,3.6 aa/turn 1.5 Å/aa

N-term

C-term

prototypical = -57ψ = -47

Page 16: Consensus sequences, showing conserved sites, may be represented in different ways

The α-helix is a right-handed helix

Page 17: Consensus sequences, showing conserved sites, may be represented in different ways

α-Helices have a dipole moment, due to unbonded and aligned N-H and C=O groups