17
Accreditation of informal and non-formal learning Gráinne Conole, Project Evaluator 10 th November 2014 National Think Tank Sydney National Teaching Fellow 2012 Ascilite fellow 2012 EDEN fellow 2013

Conole thinktank

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Conole thinktank

Accreditation of informal and non-formal learning

Gráinne Conole, Project Evaluator10th November 2014National Think Tank

Sydney

National Teaching

Fellow 2012 Ascilite fellow 2012EDEN fellow 2013

Page 2: Conole thinktank

• External evaluator• Focus on:– Vision– Process– Outputs – Impact– Dissemination

Page 3: Conole thinktank

Outline

• Issues• Projects– The OPAL initiative– POERUP – VMPass– OpenEd

• Mapping informal and formal learning

Page 4: Conole thinktank

• Emergence of OER and MOOCs challenging formal education

• New business models emerging• How to accredit informal and non-formal

learning

Page 5: Conole thinktank

The OPAL metromap

http://www.oer-quality.org/

Evaluation shows lack of uptake by teachers and learnersShift from development to community building and articulation of OER practice

Page 6: Conole thinktank

POERUP Achievements

• Inventory of more than 500 OER initiatives worldwide

• 33 country reports - most being updated

• 7 case studies including Wikiwijs, ALISON (Ireland), OER U (global) and FutureLearn (UK mostly)

• 3 EU-level policy documents for universities, VET and schools

• 8 policy documents for UK (x3), Ireland, France, Netherlands, Poland – and Canada

KA3 ICT

Page 7: Conole thinktank

Themes for policy recommendations• Communication and awareness raising• Funding• Copyright / licensing • Reducing regulatory barriers• Quality • Teacher training and continuous professional development• Certification and accreditation• Infrastructure • Further research

7

Page 8: Conole thinktank

Many learners wish to have formal, transferable recognition of their knowledge & skillsChallenges:•New players (private sector, non-profit) in unbundled learning provision•Open learning recognition is a recent topic, lack of guidelines for interested actors

Page 9: Conole thinktank

Many learners wish to have formal, transferable recognition of their knowledge & skills!Potential•Recognition would –create a link between traditional and open and flexible learning–Create trust in OER, MOOCs, OCW, Virtual Mobility

•Assessment and recognition might become a business model for OER, MOOCs, OCW…

Page 10: Conole thinktank

Information from OER provider (HEI) Information from

learner

Information from assessing/certifying

institution

Learning Passport for accreditation

Page 11: Conole thinktank

•Applied Quality Procedures•Estimated Hours of Workload•Learning Outcomes described (Knowledge, Skills, Competences)•Learning activities required by the learner•Certification options

Information from OER provider (HEI) Information from

learner

Information from assessing/certifying

institution

Page 12: Conole thinktank

•General personal information•Period in which study occurred•Information about the learning activities + evidence source (e.g. PORTFOLIO)

Information from OER provider (HEI) Information from

learner

Information from assessing/certifying

institution

Page 13: Conole thinktank

•Assessment Components (form)•Which LO were verified?•Quality Control Procedures for Assessment

•Equivalence of certification within institution•Position of certification within qualification framework•Grading scheme (pass/fail, numerical)

Information from OER provider (HEI) Information from

learner

Information from assessing/certifying

institution

Page 14: Conole thinktank
Page 15: Conole thinktank

Accrediting open learning

Page 16: Conole thinktank

Formal

Informal

Individual Social

Blended courses

DL+ social media

Trad. campus courses

DL courses

OER

xMOOCs

OER + Social media

cMOOCs

APELePortforliosOERuBadges

Formal/informal landscape

Page 17: Conole thinktank

http://www.slideshare.net/GrainneConoleEmail: [email protected]

Blog: http://e4innovation.comTwitter: @gconole