93

Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27
Page 2: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27
Page 3: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades

Page 1 Public R1-2016-07-27

Executive Summary Project Overview FortisAlberta Inc. (FortisAlberta), in its capacity as the legal owner of distribution facilities (DFO), submitted a system access service request (SASR) to the Alberta Electric System Operator (AESO) to meet the DFO’s distribution system criteria and serve load growth in the towns of Okotoks, Black Diamond, and the surrounding areas. The SASR includes a request for Rate DTS, Demand Transmission Service, contract capacity increases of approximately 31 MW (from 18.8 MW to 49.3 MW), for the system access service provided at the Okotoks 678S substation, and approximately 24 MW (from 31.5 MW to 55.7 MW) for the system access service provided at the High River 65S substation, and a request for transmission development (collectively, the Project). Specifically, the DFO requested upgrades to the existing Okotoks 678S substation and modifications to the existing High River 65S substation. The scheduled in-service date for the Project is May 15, 2017. This report details the system performance studies undertaken to assess the impact of the Project on the Alberta interconnected electric system (AIES).

Existing System Geographically, the Project is located in the AESO planning area of High River (Area 46), which is part of the AESO South Planning Region. The High River area is adjacent to the planning areas of Seebe (Area 44), Calgary (Area 6), Strathmore / Blackie (Area 45), Stavely (Area 49), and Fort Macleod (Area 53). From a transmission system perspective, the High River planning area consists primarily of 138 kV and 69 kV transmission systems. The Foothills 237S substation is a 240/138 kV source substation, which is connected to the Okotoks 678S and High River 65S substations through the 138 kV transmission lines 646L and 434L. The High River planning area also connects to Strathmore / Blackie planning area via the 138 kV transmission lines 850L and 753L. The 240/138 kV Janet 74S substation serves as a main source for the Strathmore / Blackie planning area. Existing constraints in South Planning Region are managed in accordance with the procedures set out in Section 302.1 of the ISO rules, Real Time Transmission Constraint Management. A remedial action scheme (RAS) is used in the Strathmore / Blackie planning area (Area 45) to mitigate constraints associated with thermal criteria violations on the existing 138 kV transmission line 876L.

Study Summary Study area for the Project

The Study Area for the Project is defined as the AESO planning areas of High River (Area 46) and Strathmore / Blackie (Area 45), including the tie lines connecting these planning areas to the rest of the AIES. All transmission facilities within the Study Area were studied and monitored to

Page 4: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades

Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

assess the impact of the Project on the AIES, including any violations of the Reliability Criteria (as defined in Section 2.1.1). Analyses performed for the Project Power flow analysis was performed for the 2017 summer peak (SP) and 2017 winter peak (WP) pre-Project and post-Project scenarios. Voltage stability analysis was performed for the 2017 WP post-Project scenario.

Results of the pre-Project studies

The following is a summary of the pre-Project studies results. Results and applicable mitigation measures for pre-Project contingencies are shown in greater detail in Table E-1 below.

Category A conditions

No Reliability Criteria violations were observed under Category A conditions for any of the pre-Project scenarios.

Category B contingency conditions

The pre-Project power flow analysis identified a number of system performance issues under Category B contingency conditions, including thermal criteria violations and POD bus voltage deviations.

Connection alternatives examined for the Project

This report examined four transmission alternatives to meet the DFO’s request for system access service.

Alternative 1– Upgrade Okotoks 678S substation Alternative 1 involves upgrading the Okotoks 678S substation, and includes adding one 138/25 kV transformer, three 138 kV circuit breakers, and a minimum of four 25 kV circuit breakers.

Alternative 2 – Upgrade Okotoks 678S substation and modify High River 65S substation Alternative 2 involves upgrading the Okotoks 678S substation, and includes adding one 138/25 kV transformer, three 138 kV circuit breakers, and a minimum of two 25 kV circuit breakers.

This alternative also involves modifying the High River 65S substation, including adding two 25 kV circuit breakers.

Alternative 3 – New POD substation in the Okotoks area Alternative 3 involves adding a new POD substation in the Okotoks area, including a 138/25 kV transformer and four 25 kV circuit breakers. The new POD substation would be connected to the existing 138 kV transmission line 727L using an in/out configuration, which includes adding two 138 kV circuits.

Alternative 4 – New POD substation in the Okotoks area and upgrade Black Diamond 392S substation Alternative 4 involves adding a new POD substation in the Okotoks area, including adding a 138/25 kV transformer and two 25 kV circuit breakers. The new POD would be

Page 5: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades

Page 3 Public R1-2016-07-27

connected to the existing Okotoks 678S and Black Diamond 392S substations by adding two 138 kV transmission circuits. Alternative 4 also involves upgrading the existing Black Diamond 392S substation, including replacing the existing 69/25 kV transformer with a 138/25 kV transformer, which also has a higher capacity.

Connection alternatives not selected for further studies

Alternative 1

Alternative 1 is considered technically feasible. However, the DFO has advised that the distribution system developments associated with Alternative 1 result in a less reliable distribution system than Alternative 2. The DFO has advised that Alternative 1 could negatively impact the reliability of the distribution system. Furthermore, compared to Alternative 2, Alternative 1 requires the addition of a greater number of distribution feeders at the Okotoks 678S substation. Thus, Alternative 1 would restrict the possibility of future distribution system developments at the Okotoks 678S substation. The DFO has advised that the expected load growth at the Okotoks 678S substation exceeds the expected load growth at the High River 65S substation, and that it would be preferable to maintain the ability to add additional distribution feeders at the Okotoks 678S substation rather than to serve expected load growth in the Okotoks area from the High River 65S substation, which the DFO has advised would be inefficient. Based on the distribution system reliability and expandability concerns that are associated with Alternative 1, the AESO considers that Alternative 1 is an inferior option to Alternative 2. Alternative 1 was not selected for further study. Alternative 3 and Alternative 4

Alternative 3 and Alternative 4 are considered technically feasible. These alternatives involve increased transmission developments and hence, increased costs compared to Alternative 2. Alternative 3 and Alternative 4 were not selected for further study.

Connection alternatives selected for further studies

Alternative 2 is considered technically feasible and was selected for further study.

Results of the post-Project studies

The following is a brief summary of the post-Project studies results. The post-Project studies results, Project impact on the performance of the AIES, and applicable mitigation measures are summarized in Table E-1, below. Category A conditions No Reliability Criteria violations were observed under Category A conditions for any of the post-Project scenarios.

Category B contingency conditions The post-Project power flow analysis identified a number of system performance issues under Category B contingency conditions, including thermal criteria violations and POD bus voltage deviations.

Project interdependencies No project interdependencies were identified.

Page 6: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades

Page 4 Public R1-2016-07-27

Conclusions and Recommendation Analysis and Conclusions

Table E- 1 provides analysis of, and conclusions about, the impact of the Project for selected contingencies, including mitigation measures for observed Reliability Criteria violations. The contingencies in Table E-1 were selected because, in the post-Project scenarios, either new Reliability Criteria violations were observed or Reliability Criteria violations observed in the pre-Project scenarios were materially worsened.

Table E- 1 Project Impact and Mitigation Measures (Selected Contingencies)

Identified Reliability Criteria Violation Occurrence

Impact Level

of Project

System Conditio

n

Mitigation Measures

(Pre- and Post-Project) Violation Contingency

Thermal criteria violation on the 138 kV transmission line 876L

(Blackie 253S – Gleichen 179S)

691L (Janet 74S – planned Chestermere 419S)

Pre-Project and Post-Project Marginal 2017 SP

Pre: The planned RAS that is associated with Project 1631 (Chestermere RAS). Post: Same as pre-Project

Pre-Project and Post-Project Significant 2017 WP

Pre: Real-time operational practices

Post: Chestermere RAS

Thermal criteria violation on the 138 kV transmission line 691L (Janet 74S – planned Chestermere 419S)

PCES01L (Namaka 428S –

Cavalier power plant)

Pre-Project and Post-Project Significant 2017 SP

Pre: Real-time operational practices Post: Chestermere RAS

Post-Project only Significant 2017 WP

Pre: None required Post: Real-time operational practices

138/13.8 kV transformer at the Cavalier power

plant

Pre-Project and Post-Project Significant 2017 SP

Pre: Real-time operational practices

Post: Chestermere RAS

Post-Project only Significant 2017 WP

Pre: None required

Post: Real-time operational practices

876L (Blackie 253S – Gleichen 179S)

Pre-Project and Post-Project Significant 2017 SP

Pre: Real-time operational practices

Post: Chestermere RAS

434L (Foothills 237S - High

River 65S)

Post-Project only Significant 2017 SP

Pre: None required

Post: Chestermere RAS

434L (Foothills 237S - High

River 65S)

Post-Project only Significant 2017 WP

Pre: None required

Post: Real-time operational practices

Significant 2017 SP Pre: None required

Page 7: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades

Page 5 Public R1-2016-07-27

Identified Reliability Criteria Violation Occurrence

Impact Level

of Project

System Conditio

n

Mitigation Measures

(Pre- and Post-Project) Violation Contingency

646L (Foothills 237S – Okotoks 678S)

Post-Project only

Post: Real-time operational practices

753L (High River 65S –

Blackie 253S)

Post-Project only Significant 2017 SP

Pre: None required

Post: Real-time operational practices

The connection assessment identified a number of pre-Project and post-Project system performance issues. Real-time operational practices and the Chestermere RAS can be used to mitigate all of the identified pre- and post-Project system performance issues. The Project does not impact the effectiveness of existing RASs in the Study Area, nor does the Project create the need for new RASs in the Study Area. Based on the studies results, Alternative 2 is technically viable. The minimum transformation capacity required for the 138/25 kV transformer in Alternative 2 is 28 MVA.

Recommendations

It is recommended to proceed with the Project using Alternative 2 as the preferred option to respond to the DFO’s request for system access service. It is also recommended to use real-time operational practices and the Chestermere RAS to mitigate the identified system performance issues. For Alternative 2, a transformer size of 42 MVA would be recommended based on good electric industry practice and under advisement from the legal owner of transmission facilities regarding its asset management and inventory practices.

Page 8: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades

Page 6 Public R1-2016-07-27

Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................... 1 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 9

1.1. Project ........................................................................................................................................... 9 1.1.1. Project Overview .................................................................................................................... 9 1.1.2. Load Component ................................................................................................................... 9 1.1.3. Generation Component ......................................................................................................... 9

1.2. Study Scope .................................................................................................................................. 9 1.2.1. Study Objectives .................................................................................................................... 9 1.2.2. Study Area ........................................................................................................................... 10 1.2.3. Studies Performed ............................................................................................................... 12

1.3. Report Overview .......................................................................................................................... 12 2. Criteria, System Data, and Study Assumptions ............................................................................. 13

2.1. Criteria, Standards, and Requirements ....................................................................................... 13 2.1.1. Transmission Planning Standards and Reliability Criteria ................................................... 13 2.1.2. AESO Rules and IDs ........................................................................................................... 14

2.2. Study Scenarios .......................................................................................................................... 14 2.3. Load and Generation Assumptions ............................................................................................. 15

2.3.1. Load Assumptions ............................................................................................................... 15 2.3.2. Generation Assumptions ..................................................................................................... 15 2.3.3. Intertie Flow Assumptions ................................................................................................... 16 2.3.4. HVDC Power Order ............................................................................................................. 16

2.4. System Projects ........................................................................................................................... 16 2.5. Customer Connection Projects .................................................................................................... 17 2.6. Facility Ratings and Shunt Elements ........................................................................................... 17 2.7. Voltage Profile Assumptions ....................................................................................................... 19

3. Study Methodology ........................................................................................................................... 21 3.1. Study Objectives .......................................................................................................................... 21 3.2. Connection Studies Carried Out .................................................................................................. 21 3.3. Power Flow Analysis ................................................................................................................... 21

3.3.1. Contingencies Studied ......................................................................................................... 22 3.4. Voltage Stability (PV) Analysis .................................................................................................... 22

3.4.1. Contingencies Studied ......................................................................................................... 22 4. Pre-Project System Assessment ..................................................................................................... 23

4.1. Pre-Project Power Flow Analysis ................................................................................................ 23 4.1.1. Scenario 1 (2017 SP Pre-Project) ....................................................................................... 23 4.1.2. Scenario 2 (2017 WP pre-Project) ....................................................................................... 25

5. Connection Alternatives ................................................................................................................... 26 5.1. Overview ...................................................................................................................................... 26 5.2. Connection Alternatives Identified ............................................................................................... 26

5.2.1. Connection Alternatives Selected for Further Studies ......................................................... 27 5.2.2. Connection Alternatives Not Selected for Further Studies .................................................. 27

6. Technical Analysis of the Connection Alternative ........................................................................ 28 6.1. Power Flow .................................................................................................................................. 28

6.1.1. Scenario 3 (2017 SP post-Project) ...................................................................................... 28 6.1.2. Scenario 4 (2017 WP, post-Project) .................................................................................... 30

6.2. Voltage Stability ........................................................................................................................... 31 6.2.1. Scenario 4 (2017 WP, post-Project) .................................................................................... 31

6.3. Results Summary ........................................................................................................................ 32

Page 9: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades

Page 7 Public R1-2016-07-27

7. Project Interdependencies ............................................................................................................... 34 8. Conclusions and Recommendations .............................................................................................. 35

Page 10: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades

Page 8 Public R1-2016-07-27

Attachments Attachment A: Pre-Project Load Flow Diagrams (Scenario 1 to 2) Attachment B: Post-Project Load Flow Diagrams (Scenario 3 to 4) Attachment C: Post-Project Voltage Stability Diagrams (Scenario 4)

Figures Figure 1-1: Study Area Transmission System in 2017 ................................................................................................. 11

Tables Table 2.1-1: Post-Contingency Voltage Deviation Guidelines ...................................................................................... 14 Table 2.2-1: Summary of Study Scenario Assumptions ............................................................................................... 14 Table 2.3-1: Forecast Area Load (2016 LTO at South Planning Region Peak) ............................................................ 15 Table 2.3-2: Local Generation (MW) in the Study Cases ............................................................................................. 15 Table 2.3-3: Intertie Flow Assumptions ........................................................................................................................ 16 Table 2.4-1: Summary of System Projects Included in the Study Cases ..................................................................... 17 Table 2.5-1: Summary of Customer Connection Projects in Study Area ...................................................................... 17 Table 2.6-1: Summary of Key Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area (MVA based on voltage class) ............... 18 Table 2.6-2: Summary of Transformer Ratings in the Study Area ................................................................................ 18 Table 2.6-3: Summary of Shunt Elements in the Study Area ....................................................................................... 19 Table 2.7-1: Operating Voltages at Key Nodes in the Study Area and Vicinity ............................................................ 19 Table 3.2-1: Summary of Studies Performed ............................................................................................................... 21 Table 4.1-1: Summary of system performance before and after applying mitigation measures (thermal loading) – Scenario 1 (Category B contingency conditions).......................................................................................................... 24 Table 4.1-2: Summary of system performance before applying mitigation measures (POD bus voltage deviations) – Scenario 1 (Category B contingency conditions).......................................................................................................... 24 Table 4.1-3: Summary of system performance before and after applying mitigation measures (thermal loading) – Scenario 2 (Category B contingency conditions).......................................................................................................... 25 Table 6.1-1: Summary of system performance before and after applying mitigation measures (thermal loading) – Scenario 3 (Category B contingency conditions).......................................................................................................... 29 Table 6.1-2: Summary of system performance before applying mitigation measures (POD bus voltage deviations) – Scenario 3 (Category B contingency conditions)* ........................................................................................................ 30 Table 6.1-3: Summary of system performance before and after applying mitigation measures (thermal loading) – Scenario 4 (Category B contingency conditions).......................................................................................................... 31 Table 6.2-1: Voltage stability analysis results – Scenario 4 (Minimum transfer = 14.135 MW) .................................... 32 Table 6.3-1: Project impact and mitigation measures .................................................................................................. 32

Page 11: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades

Page 9 Public R1-2016-07-27

1. Introduction This report presents the results of the engineering studies conducted to assess the impact of the Project (as defined below) on the Alberta Interconnected Electrical System (AIES).

1.1. Project

1.1.1. Project Overview

FortisAlberta Inc. (FortisAlberta), in its capacity as the legal owner of distribution facilities (DFO), submitted a system access service request (SASR) to the Alberta Electric System Operator (AESO) to meet the DFO’s distribution system criteria and serve load growth in the towns of Okotoks, Black Diamond, and the surrounding area. The SASR includes a request for Rate DTS, Demand Transmission Service, contract capacity increases of approximately 31 MW (from 18.8 MW to 49.3 MW) at the Okotoks 678S substation, and approximately 24 MW (from 31.5 MW to 55.7 MW) at the High River 65S substation, and a request for transmission development (collectively, the Project). Specifically, the DFO requested upgrades to the existing Okotoks 678S substation and modifications to the existing High River 65S substation. The scheduled in-service date for the Project is May 15, 2017.

1.1.2. Load Component

• The existing Rate DTS contract capacity at the Okotoks 678S substation is 18.8 MW. • The existing Rate DTS contract capacity at the High River 65S substation is 31.5 MW. • The requested load addition at Okotoks 678S substation is 30.5 MW by May 2017. • The requested load addition at High River 65S substation is 24.2 MW by May 2017. • The load will be studied assuming a 0.9 power factor (PF) lagging. • Load type: farm, residential, commercial and industrial loads • Currently there is no plan for future expansion beyond the requested developments

associated with the DFO’s SASR.

1.1.3. Generation Component

• There is no generation component associated with the Project.

1.2. Study Scope

1.2.1. Study Objectives

The objectives of the study are as follows: 1. Assess the impact of the Project on the performance of the AIES.

Page 12: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades

Page 10 Public R1-2016-07-27

2. Identify any violations of the relevant criteria, standards, or requirements of the AESO, both pre-and post-Project.

3. Recommend mitigation measures, if required, to enable the reliable connection of the Project to the AIES.

1.2.2. Study Area

1.2.2.1. Study Area Description

Geographically, the Project is located in the AESO planning area of High River (Area 46), which is part of the AESO South Planning Region. The High River area is adjacent to the planning areas of Seebe (Area 44), Calgary (Area 6), Strathmore / Blackie (Area 45), Stavely (Area 49), and Fort Macleod (Area 53). From a transmission system perspective, the High River planning area consists primarily of 138 kV and 69 kV transmission systems. The Foothills 237S substation is a 240/138 kV source substation, which is connected to the Okotoks 678S and High River 65S substations through the 138 kV transmission lines 646L and 434L. The High River planning area also connects to Strathmore / Blackie planning area via the 138 kV transmission lines 850L and 753L. The 240/138 kV Janet 74S substation serves as a main source for the Strathmore / Blackie planning area. Figure 1-1 shows a schematic representation of the expected transmission system in the Study Area in 2017. The Study Area for the Project is defined as the AESO planning areas of High River (Area 46) and Strathmore / Blackie (Area 45), including the tie lines connecting these planning areas to the rest of the AIES. All transmission facilities within the Study Area were studied and monitored for violations of the Reliability Criteria (as defined in Section 2.1.1).

Page 13: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades

Page 11 Public R1-2016-07-27

Figure 1-1: Study Area Transmission System in 2017

1.2.2.2. Existing Constraints

Existing constraints in the South Planning Region are managed in accordance with the procedures set out in Section 302.1 of the ISO rules, Real Time Transmission Constraint Management (TCM Rule). A remedial action scheme (RAS) is used in the Strathmore / Blackie planning area (Area 45) to mitigate constraints associated with thermal criteria violations on the existing 138 kV transmission line 876L.

Page 14: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades

Page 12 Public R1-2016-07-27

1.2.2.3. AESO Long-Term Transmission Plans (LTP)

The AESO 2015 Long-term Plan (2015 LTP)1 includes the following system developments in the Study Area in the near term (to 2020):2

• Upgrade protection on 138 kV Strathmore–Namaka–Gleichen line

1.2.3. Studies Performed

The following analyses were performed for the pre-Project scenarios: • Power flow analysis (Category A conditions and Category B contingencies)

The following studies were performed for the post-Project scenarios: • Power flow analysis (Category A conditions and Category B contingencies)• Voltage stability analysis (Category A conditions and Category B contingencies)

1.3. Report Overview

The Executive Summary provides a high-level summary of the report and its conclusions. Section 1 provides an introduction of the Project. Section 2 describes the criteria, system data, and study assumptions used in this study. Section 3 presents the methodology used for this study. Section 4 discusses the pre-Project assessment of the system. Section 5 presents the connection alternatives examined. Section 6 provides a technical analysis of the post-Project system assessment for the alternatives that were selected for further study. Section 7 discusses project interdependencies, if any. Section 8 presents the conclusions and recommendations of this report.

1 The 2015 LTP document is available on the AESO website. 2 The 2015 LTP identifies the transmission developments in the Strathmore-Blackie-High River sub-region on page 36.

Page 15: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades

Page 13 Public R1-2016-07-27

2. Criteria, System Data, and Study Assumptions

2.1. Criteria, Standards, and Requirements

2.1.1. Transmission Planning Standards and Reliability Criteria

The Transmission Planning (TPL) Standards, which are included in the Alberta Reliability Standards, and the AESO’s Transmission Planning Criteria – Basis and Assumptions 3 (collectively, the Reliability Criteria) were applied to evaluate system performance under Category A system conditions (i.e., all elements in-service) and following Category B contingencies (i.e., single element outage), prior to and following the studied alternatives. Below is a summary of Category A and Category B system conditions. Category A, often referred to as the N-0 condition, represents a normal system with no contingencies and all facilities in service. Under this condition, the system must be able to supply all firm load and firm transfers to other areas. All equipment must operate within its applicable rating, voltages must be within their applicable range, and the system must be stable with no cascading outages. Category B events, often referred to as an N-1 or N-G-1 with the most critical generator out of service, result in the loss of any single specified system element under specified fault conditions with normal clearing. These elements are a generator, a transmission circuit, a transformer, or a single pole of a DC transmission line. The acceptable impact on the system is the same as Category A. Planned or controlled interruptions of electric supply to radial customers or some local network customers, connected to or supplied by the faulted element or by the affected area, may occur in certain areas without impacting the overall reliability of the interconnected transmission systems. To prepare for the next contingency, system adjustments are permitted, including curtailments of contracted firm (non-recallable reserved) transmission service electric power transfers. The Alberta Reliability Standards include the Transmission Planning (TPL) standards that specify the desired system performance under different contingency categories with respect to the Applicable Ratings. The transmission system performance under various system conditions is defined in Appendix 1 of the TPL standards. For the purpose of applying the TPL standards to this study, the Applicable Ratings shall mean:

• Seasonal continuous thermal rating of the line’s loading limits. • Highest specified loading limits for transformers.

• For Category A conditions: Voltage range under normal operating condition should follow the AESO Information Document ID #2010-007RS, which relates to Section 304.4 of the ISO rules, Maintaining Network Voltage. For the busses not listed in ID #2010-007RS, Table 2-1 in the Transmission Planning Criteria – Basis and Assumptions applies.

• For Category B conditions: The extreme voltage range values per Table 2-1 in the Transmission Planning Criteria – Basis and Assumptions.

3 Filed under a separate cover

Page 16: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades

Page 14 Public R1-2016-07-27

• Desired post-contingency voltage change limits for three defined post event timeframes as provided in Table 2.1-1, below.

Table 2.1-1: Post-Contingency Voltage Deviation Guidelines

Parameter and reference point

Time Period Post Transient (up to 30 sec)

Post Auto Control (30 sec to 5 min)

Post Manual Control (Steady

State) Voltage deviation from steady state at

POD low voltage bus. ±10% ±7% ±5%

2.1.2. AESO Rules and IDs

The AESO ID #2010-007RS will be applied to establish pre-contingency voltage profiles in the Study Area. The TCM Rule will be followed in setting up the study scenarios and assessment of the impact of the Project. In addition, due regard will be given to the AESO’s Connection Study Requirements and the AESO’s Generation and Load Interconnection Standard.

2.2. Study Scenarios

The scheduled ISD for the Project is May 15, 2017. Hence, the study was conducted using the 2017 summer peak (SP) and 2017 winter peak (WP) scenarios. Table 2.2-1 provides a list of the study scenarios. Scenario 1 and Scenario 2 are the pre-Project 2017 SP and 2017 WP scenarios. Scenario 3 and Scenario 4 are the post-Project 2017 SP and 2017 WP scenarios, respectively, with the requested Rate DTS contract capacity increase of 30.5 MW at the Okotoks 678S substation and 24.2 MW at the High River 65S substation. A 0.9 PF lagging was used for the new Project load.

Table 2.2-1: Summary of Study Scenario Assumptions

Scenario No.

Year/Season Load

Project Load (MW) Okotoks 678S High River 65S

Pre-Project System 1 2017 SP 18.8 31.5

2 2017 WP 18.8 31.5

Post-Project System

3 2017 SP 49.3 55.7

4 2017 WP 49.3 55.7

Page 17: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades

Page 15 Public R1-2016-07-27

2.3. Load and Generation Assumptions

2.3.1. Load Assumptions

The load forecast used for this connection study is shown in Table 2.3-1 and is based on the AESO 2016 Long-term Outlook (2016 LTO). In this study the active power to reactive power ratio in the base case scenarios was maintained when modifying the planning area loads.

Table 2.3-1: Forecast Area Load (2016 LTO at South Planning Region Peak)

Region Name and Season Forecast Peak Load (MW)

2017

South Planning Region

Summer peak 1,487

Winter peak 1,489

AIL w/o Losses Summer peak 10,940

Winter peak 11,899

Note: The South Planning Region in the 2016 LTO consists of the following AESO planning areas: 4, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 52, 53, 54, and 55.

2.3.2. Generation Assumptions

The generation conditions for this connection study are described in Table 2.3-2. The study identified the Carseland Generator Unit “2”, connected to the Carseland 525S substation, as the critical generator, and will be turned off to represent the N-G study condition for all analyses. The distributed generation Mazeppa power plant will be switched off in order to assess the impact of the Project, which includes the requested Rate DTS contract capacity at the High River 65S substation.

Table 2.3-2: Local Generation (MW) in the Study Cases

Plant Name Bus Name/ID Bus Number

PlanningArea

Pmax (MW)

2017 SP Generation Net to Grid

(MW)

2017 WP Generation Net to Grid

(MW)

Cavalier

CAVAL_A ‘1’ 13.800 ‘G1’ 3247 45 64.1

28.3 33.7 CAVAL_B ‘2’ 13.800 ‘G2’

4247 45 64.1

CAVAL_B ‘3’ 13.800 ‘G3’

4247 45 26.5

Carseland

CARSELA1 ‘1’ 13.800 ‘G4’

4251 45 64.1 15.2 22.2

CARSELA1 ‘2’ 13.800 ‘1’

3251 45 64.1 OFF OFF

BowArk Energy Queenstown 200S13.8 ‘G1’ 4758 45 49 0 0

Page 18: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades

Page 16 Public R1-2016-07-27

Plant Name Bus Name/ID Bus Number

PlanningArea

Pmax (MW)

2017 SP Generation Net to Grid

(MW)

2017 WP Generation Net to Grid

(MW)

Power Plant (Project #1336) 200S13.8 ‘G2’ 4758 45 49

2.3.3. Intertie Flow Assumptions

Intertie assumptions are included for the B.C., MATL, and Saskatchewan interties. Details on the intertie flow assumptions can be found in Table 2.3-3.

Table 2.3-3: Intertie Flow Assumptions

Year/Season Load

Intertie Flow (MW)

Import (+) from /Export

(-) to BC

Import (+) from /Export (-) to

Saskatchewan

Import (+) from /Export (-) to

MATL

Pre-Project System

2017 SP 530 150 300

2017 WP 530 150 300

Post-Project System

2017 SP 530 150 300

2017 WP 530 150 300

2.3.4. HVDC Power Order

The flows in the Study Area are not influenced by the AIES HVDC facilities. As a result, HVDC assumptions are kept consistent with that in the AESO planning base cases and not adjusted for this study.

2.4. System Projects

Table 2.4-1 lists the system transmission projects in or near the Study Area that were modeled in the study scenarios.

Page 19: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades

Page 17 Public R1-2016-07-27

Table 2.4-1: Summary of System Projects Included in the Study Cases

Project Project

No. Description ISD

Southern Alberta

Transmission Reinforcement

(SATR)4

787-11 Blackie Region 138 kV Upgrade In service

2.5. Customer Connection Projects

Customer connection projects within the Study Area that have passed through Gate 2 of the AESO Connection Process as of July 2016 were modelled in the study scenarios based on their respective positions in the AESO Connection Queue. Table 2.5-1 summarizes the customer connection project assumptions that were used in the study. It should be noted that the information in this table is subject to change as projects progress.

Table 2.5-1: Summary of Customer Connection Projects in Study Area

Planning Area

Queue Position*

Planned In-Service

Date Project Name Project

# Gen (MW)

Load (MW)

Modelled in the study cases

45 25 Q2 2017 BowArk Energy Queenstown Power Plant 1336 80 0.5 Yes

45 74 Q3 2017 Fortis Chestermere New POD 1631 0 43.7 Yes

46 86 Q2 2017 Fortis Okotoks 678S-High River 65S Upgrades 1670 0 54.8 Yes

* Per the AESO Connection Queue posted in July 2016. The projects in the study area, if any that have queue positions after Project 1670 are not listed in this table and were not modelled in the study cases.

2.6. Facility Ratings and Shunt Elements

The legal owner of transmission facilities (TFO) provided the seasonal continuous thermal ratings and the short-term emergency ratings for key the transmission lines in the Study Area, as shown in Table 2.6-1.

4 The Southern Alberta Transmission Reinforcement NID was originally approved by the Alberta Utilities Commission in Decision 2009-126 on September 8, 2009, and issued NID Approval No. U2009-340 on September 17, 2009.

Page 20: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades

Page 18 Public R1-2016-07-27

Table 2.6-1: Summary of Key Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area (MVA based on voltage class)

Line ID Line Description Voltage Class (kV)

Nominal Rating (MVA)

Short-term Rating (MVA)

Summer Winter Summer Winter

13L/158L High River 65S – Black Diamond 392S 69 16 20 18 22

812L Black Diamond 392S – JCT 812AL 138 85 90 94 99

812L JCT 812AL – High River 65S 138 48 48 72 72

727L High River 65S – Mag Tap 138 119 143 131 161

727L Mag Tap – Okotoks 678S 138 119 146 131 161

727AL Magcan 142S – 727L Tap 138 121 148 133 163

434L Foothills 237S – High River 65S 138 279 287 307 373

646L Foothills 237S – Okotoks 678S 138 230 285 253 314

850L Okotoks 678S – Carseland 525S 138 89 109 98 120

851L Carseland 525S – Blackie 253S 138 85 90 94 99

753L Blackie 253S – High River 65S 138 121 143 133 143

733L Strathmore 151S – Namaka 428S 138 120 143 132 163

733L Namaka 428S – Gleichen 179S 138 120 148 132 163

876L Blackie 253S – Gleichen 179S 138 85 90 94 99

691L* Janet 74S – Chestermere 419S 138 85 90 93.5 99

Note:* indicates future new/re-configured transmission lines

The TFO also provided the facility ratings for the existing transformers in the Study Area, as shown in Table 2.6-2.

Table 2.6-2: Summary of Transformer Ratings in the Study Area

Substation Name and Number Transformer ID Transformer Voltages (kV) MVA Rating

Foothills 237S 237ST1 240/138 400

237ST2 240/138 400

Janet 74S 74ST1 240/138 400

74ST2 240/138 400

High River 65S

65ST1 138/69/4.16 18.8

65ST2 138/25 42

65ST3 138/25 42

Page 21: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades

Page 19 Public R1-2016-07-27

Substation Name and Number Transformer ID Transformer Voltages (kV) MVA Rating

Okotoks 678S 678ST1 138/25 28.1

678ST2 138/25 42

Black Diamond 392S 392ST2 69/25 25

392ST3 138/25 25

The details of shunt elements in the Study Area are given in Table 2.6-3. No reactors are present in the Study Area.

Table 2.6-3: Summary of Shunt Elements in the Study Area

Substation Name and Number

Voltage Class (kV)

Capacitors

Number of Switched

Shunt Blocks

Total at Nomina

l Voltage (MVAr)

Status in Study

(on or off) 2017 SP

2017WP

Magcan 142S 138 1 x 24.46 MVAr 24.46 on on

Blackie 253S 138 1 x 24.46 MVAr 24.46 off off

Hussar 431S 138 1 x 9.17 MVAr 9.17 on on

Strathmore 151S 138 1 x 24.35 MVAr 24.35 on on

2.7. Voltage Profile Assumptions

The AESO ID #2010-007RS is used to establish normal system (i.e. pre-contingency) voltage profiles for key area busses prior to commencing any studies. Table 2-1 of the Transmission Planning Criteria – Basis and Assumptions applies for all the busses not included in the ID #2010-007RS. These voltages will be used to set the voltage profile for the study base cases prior to power flow analysis. A list of operating voltages for the key busses in the Study Area and its vicinity are listed in Table 2.7-1.

Table 2.7-1: Operating Voltages at Key Nodes in the Study Area and Vicinity

Substation Name and Number Area

Nominal Voltage

(kV)

Minimum Operating Limit (kV)

Desired Range (kV)

Maximum Operating Limit (kV)

Janet 74S 6 240 246 248 254 264

138 138 138 142 142

Langdon 102S 6 500 510 510 535 540

Page 22: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades

Page 20 Public R1-2016-07-27

Substation Name and Number Area

Nominal Voltage

(kV)

Minimum Operating Limit (kV)

Desired Range (kV)

Maximum Operating Limit (kV)

240 250 251 255 258

Page 23: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades

Page 21 Public R1-2016-07-27

3. Study Methodology The analyses performed in this connection assessment were completed using PTI PSS/E version 33.

3.1. Study Objectives

The objectives of the study are the following: • Assess the impact of the Project on the performance of the AIES. • Identify any violations of the relevant criteria, standards or requirements of the AESO, both

pre- and post- Project. • Recommend mitigation measures, if required, to enable the reliable connection of the

Project to the AIES.

3.2. Connection Studies Carried Out

The following analyses were performed for the pre-Project scenarios: • Power flow analysis (Category A conditions and Category B contingencies)

The following studies were performed for the post-Project scenarios: • Power flow analysis (Category A conditions and Category B contingencies) • Voltage stability analysis (Category A conditions and Category B contingencies)

Table 3.2-1 summarizes the studies that were carried out for this connection assessment.

Table 3.2-1: Summary of Studies Performed Scenario(s) Studied Studies

Performed System Conditions Studied Pre-Project Post-Project

1, 2 3, 4 Power flow Category A and Category B

- 4 Voltage stability Category A and Category B

3.3. Power Flow Analysis

Pre-Project and post-Project power flow analysis was conducted to identify thermal and voltage criteria violations as per the Reliability Criteria, and to identify any deviations from the desired limits in Table 2.1-1. The purpose of the power flow analysis is to quantify any incremental violations in the Study Area after the Project is connected. Transformer taps and switched shunt reactive compensation devices such as shunt capacitors and reactors will be locked and continuous shunt devices will be enabled when performing Category B load flow analysis. Point-of-delivery (POD) low voltage bus deviations were assessed by first locking all tap changers and area capacitors to identify any post-transient voltage deviations above 10%. Second, tap

Page 24: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades

Page 22 Public R1-2016-07-27

changers were allowed to move while capacitors remained locked to determine if any voltage deviations above 7% were found in the area. Third, all taps and capacitor controls were allowed to adjust, and voltage deviations above 5% were reported for both the pre-Project and post-Project scenarios

3.3.1. Contingencies Studied

The study included all Category B contingencies (69 kV facilities and above) within the Study Area, including the tie lines connecting the Study Area to the surrounding planning areas. For the power flow analysis, all transmission facilities in the Study Area were monitored for voltage criteria violations and thermal criteria violations under Category A conditions and under Category B contingency conditions.

3.4. Voltage Stability (PV) Analysis

The objective of the voltage stability analysis is to determine the ability of the network to maintain voltage stability at all the busses in the system under normal and abnormal system conditions. The power-voltage (PV) curve is a representation of voltage change as a result of increased power transfer between two systems. The reported incremental transfers will be to the collapse point. As per the AESO requirements, no assessment based upon other criteria such as minimum voltage will be made at the PV minimum transfer. Voltage stability analysis was performed for one post-Project scenario. For load connection projects, the load level modelled in post-Project scenarios is the same or higher than in pre-Project scenarios. Therefore, voltage stability analysis for pre-Project scenarios would only be performed if the post-Project scenarios show voltage stability criteria violations. Voltage stability (PV) analysis will be performed according to the Western Electricity Coordinating Council (WECC) Voltage Stability Assessment Methodology. WECC voltage stability criteria state, for load areas, post-transient voltage stability is required for the area modeled at a minimum of 105% of the reference load level for system normal conditions (Category A) and for single contingencies (Category B). For this standard, the reference load level is the maximum established planned load. Typically, voltage stability analysis is carried out assuming the worst case scenarios in terms of loading. The analysis was performed by increasing load in the Study Area and by increasing generation in the Wabamun planning area (Area 40).

3.4.1. Contingencies Studied

Voltage stability analysis was performed for Category A conditions and all Category B contingencies (69 kV facilities and above) in the Study Area.

Page 25: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades

Page 23 Public R1-2016-07-27

4. Pre-Project System Assessment

4.1. Pre-Project Power Flow Analysis

This section provides the analysis of the pre-Project power flow studies and includes the studies results and the mitigation measures for observed Reliability Criteria violations, if any. The pre-Project power flow diagrams are provided in Attachment A.

4.1.1. Scenario 1 (2017 SP Pre-Project)

Category A conditions

No Reliability Criteria violations were observed under Category A conditions.

Category B contingency conditions

Thermal criteria violations and POD bus voltage deviations beyond the desired limits provided in Table 2.1-1 were observed under Category B contingency conditions.

The thermal criteria violations and the applicable mitigation measures, which are also described below, are shown in Table 4.1-1.

• Loading above the short-term emergency rating of the 138 kV transmission line 876L (between the Blackie 253S and Gleichen 179S substations) was observed following the loss of the 138 kV transmission line 691L (between the Janet 74S and planned Chestermere 419S substations). This thermal criteria violation can be mitigated by the planned RAS that is associated with Project 1631 (the Chestermere RAS).5

• Loading below the short-term emergency rating of the 138 kV transmission line 691L was observed following a number of Category B contingencies, as follows:

o Loss of the 138 kV transmission line PCES01L (between the Namaka 428S substation and the Cavalier power plant);

o Loss of a 138/13.8 kV transformer at the Cavalier power plant; or o Loss of the 138 kV transmission line 876L.

These thermal criteria violations can be managed by using real-time operational practices.

5 Project 1631 is also referred to as the Fortis Chestermere New POD project, which currently has a scheduled ISD of Q3 2017. The transmission developments associated with Project 1631 include the addition of a planned new 138/25 kV POD substation, to be designated the Chestermere 419S substation. The Chestermere RAS that is planned as part of the scope of Project 1631 would trip load at the planned Chestermere 419S substation under the following conditions: (a) when a thermal criteria violation is detected on the 138 kV transmission line 691L; or (b) when a voltage range criteria violation is detected at the planned Chestermere 419S substation; or (c) following the loss of the 138 kV transmission line 691L under specific pre-contingency loading conditions. The specifics of the Chestermere RAS are outside the scope of the Project, and would be included in a separate application for Project 1631 to be filed with the Alberta Utilities Commission.

Page 26: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades

Page 24 Public R1-2016-07-27

Table 4.1-1: Summary of system performance before and after applying mitigation measures (thermal loading6) – Scenario 1 (Category B contingency conditions)

Contingency Limiting Branch

Seasonal Continuous

Thermal Rating (MVA)

Short-term Emergency

Rating (MVA)

Details of Constraints Mitigation

Load flow

(MVA) %

Loading Mitigation Measure

Performance After

Applying Mitigation Measure

% Loading 691L

(Janet 74S – planned

Chestermere 419S)

876L (Blackie 253S – Gleichen 179S)

85 93.5 102.5 120 Chestermere RAS 69

PCES01L (Namaka 428S – Cavalier power

plant)

691L (Janet 74S –

planned Chestermere 419S)

85 93.5 90.2 106 Real-time

operational practices

<100%

138/13.8 kV transformer at

Cavalier power plant

691L (Janet 74S –

planned Chestermere 419S)

85 93.5 90.0 106 Real-time

operational practices

<100%

876L (Blackie 253S – Gleichen 179S)

691L (Janet 74S –

planned Chestermere 419S)

85 93.5 91.4 107 Real-time

operational practices

<100%

The POD bus voltage deviations beyond the desired limits, which are also described below, are shown in Table 4.1-2.

• POD bus voltage deviations at the planned Chestermere 419S substation were observed following the loss of the 138 kV transmission line 691L. Mitigation measures are not developed to address POD bus voltage deviations that exceed the desired limits in Table 2.1-1.7 However, this system performance issue can be mitigated by the Chestermere RAS, which would be activated under the same system conditions that are associated with the thermal criteria violation observed on the 138 kV transmission line 876L following the loss of the 138 kV transmission line 691L. In other words, these observed POD bus voltage deviations can be mitigated as a byproduct of the Chestermere RAS.

Table 4.1-2: Summary of system performance before applying mitigation measures (POD bus voltage deviations) – Scenario 1 (Category B contingency conditions)

Contingency Substation Name and Number

Bus No.

Nominal kV

Initial Voltage

(kV)

Voltage Deviations for POD Busses Only

Post Transient

(kV) %

Change Post Auto (kV)

% Change

Post Manual

(kV) %

Change

691L (Janet 74S – planned Chestermere 419S)

(planned) Chestermere

419S 3949 25 25.4 22.8 10.1 -- -- -- --

6 Throughout the report, all line flows associated with the power flow analysis are reported as percentage loading relative to normal line rating as shown in Table 2.6-1. 7 The AESO’s desired post-contingency voltage deviations for low voltage busses represent guidelines rather than criteria. A POD bus voltage deviation that exceeds the desired limits shown in Table 2.1-1 does not represent a Reliability Criteria violation.

Page 27: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades

Page 25 Public R1-2016-07-27

4949 25 25.4 22.8 10.1 -- -- -- --

4.1.2. Scenario 2 (2017 WP pre-Project)

Category A conditions

No Reliability Criteria violations were observed under Category A conditions.

Category B contingency conditions

A thermal criteria violation was observed under Category B contingency conditions. The thermal criteria violation and the applicable mitigation measure are described below and shown in Table 4.1-3:

• Loading below the short-term emergency rating of the existing 138 kV transmission line 876L was observed following the loss of the 138 kV transmission line 691L. This thermal criteria violation can be mitigated by using real-time operational practices.

Table 4.1-3: Summary of system performance before and after applying mitigation measures (thermal loading) – Scenario 2 (Category B contingency conditions)

Contingency Limiting Branch

Seasonal Continuous

Thermal Rating (MVA)

Short-term Emergency

Rating (MVA)

Details of Constraints Mitigation

Load flow

(MVA) %

Loading Mitigation Approach

Post Mitigation

Performance% Loading

691L (Janet 74S –

planned Chestermere 419S)

876L (Blackie 253S – Gleichen 179S)

90 99 96.1 107

Real-time operational practices

<100%

Page 28: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades

Page 26 Public R1-2016-07-27

5. Connection Alternatives

5.1. Overview Four transmission alternatives were examined to meet the DFO’s request for system access service, as detailed in Section 5.2.

5.2. Connection Alternatives Identified

Below is a description of the developments associated with the transmission alternatives that were examined for the Project.8

Alternative 1– Upgrade Okotoks 678S substation Alternative 1 involves upgrading the existing Okotoks 678S substation, including adding a 138/25 kV transformer and a minimum of four 25 kV circuit breakers to accommodate the addition of four 25 kV distribution feeders. In order to meet the DFO’s reliability requirements, Alternative 1 also involves adding three 138 kV circuit breakers at the Okotoks 678S substation (two for the two existing transformers and one for the planned third transformer). The DFO has advised that two of the four 25 kV feeders at the Okotoks 678S substation would provide back-up support for the Black Diamond 392S substation. The two feeders would be configured as a 23 km 25 kV double-circuit (D/C) line as opposed to a combination of 25 kV D/C and single-circuit (S/C) lines, as contemplated by Alternative 2. Alternative 2 – Upgrade Okotoks 678S substation and modify High River 65S substation Alternative 2 involves upgrading the existing Okotoks 678S substation, including adding a 138/25 kV transformer and a minimum of two 25 kV circuit breakers to accommodate the addition of two 25 kV distribution feeders. In order to meet the DFO’s reliability requirements, Alternative 2 also involves adding three 138 kV circuit breakers at the Okotoks 678S substation (two for the two existing transformers and one for the planned third transformer).

Alternative 2 also involves modifying the existing High River 65S substation, including adding two 25 kV circuit breakers to accommodate the addition of two 25 kV distribution feeders. The DFO has advised that the two feeders at the High River 65S substation would provide back-up support for the Black Diamond 392S substation, and would be configured as a combination of 25 kV D/C line, approximately 11 km in length, and two 25 kV S/C lines, each approximately 20 km in length.

Alternative 3 – New POD substation in the Okotoks area Alternative 3 involves adding a new POD substation in the Okotoks area, including a 138/25 kV transformer and four 25 kV circuit breakers to accommodate the addition of four 25 kV distribution

8 These alternatives reflect more up to date engineering design than the alternatives identified in the FortisAlberta Need for Development for the Okotoks-Black Diamond Area report, which is filed under a separate cover.

Page 29: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades

Page 27 Public R1-2016-07-27

feeders. The new POD substation would be connected to the existing 138 kV transmission line 727L using an in/out configuration, which includes adding two 138 kV circuits.

Alternative 4 – New POD substation in the Okotoks area and upgrade Black Diamond 392S substation

Alternative 4 involves adding a new POD substation in the Okotoks area, including adding a 138/25 kV transformer and two 25 kV circuit breakers to accommodate the addition of two 25 kV distribution feeders. The new POD would be connected to the existing Okotoks 678S and Black Diamond 392S substations by adding two 138 kV transmission circuits. Alternative 4 also involves upgrading the existing Black Diamond 392S substation, including replacing the existing 69/25 kV 15/20/25 MVA transformer with a 138/25 kV transformer, which also has a higher capacity.

5.2.1. Connection Alternatives Selected for Further Studies

Alternative 2 is considered technically feasible and was selected for further study.

5.2.2. Connection Alternatives Not Selected for Further Studies

Alternative 1

Alternative 1 is considered technically feasible. However, the DFO has advised that the distribution system developments associated with Alternative 1 result in a less reliable distribution system than Alternative 2. The DFO has advised that Alternative 1 could negatively impact the reliability of the distribution system because the use of D/C 25 kV line is less reliable from a distribution system perspective than the use of S/C 25 kV lines. Furthermore, compared to Alternative 2, Alternative 1 requires the addition of a greater number of distribution feeders at the Okotoks 678S substation. Thus, Alternative 1 would restrict the possibility of future distribution system developments at the Okotoks 678S substation. The DFO has advised that the expected load growth at the Okotoks 678S substation exceeds the expected load growth at the High River 65S substation, and that it would be preferable to maintain the ability to add additional distribution feeders at the Okotoks 678S substation rather than to serve expected load growth in the Okotoks area from the High River 65S substation, which the DFO has advised would be inefficient. Based on the distribution system reliability and expandability concerns that are associated with Alternative 1, the AESO considers that Alternative 1 is an inferior option to Alternative 2. Alternative 1 was not selected for further study.

Alternative 3 and Alternative 4

Alternative 3 and Alternative 4 are considered technically feasible. These alternatives involve increased transmission developments and hence, increased costs compared to Alternative 2. Alternative 3 and Alternative 4 were not selected for further study.

Page 30: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades

Page 28 Public R1-2016-07-27

6. Technical Analysis of the Connection Alternative This section provides the analysis of the post-Project power flow and voltage stability studies and includes the studies results and the mitigation measures for observed Reliability Criteria violations, if any.

6.1. Power Flow

The post-Project power flow diagrams are provided in Attachment B.

6.1.1. Scenario 3 (2017 SP post-Project)

Category A conditions No Reliability Criteria violations were observed under Category A conditions. Category B contingency conditions A number of thermal criteria violations and POD bus voltage deviations beyond the desired limits were observed under Category B contingency conditions. The thermal criteria violations and the applicable mitigation measures, which are also described below, are shown in Table 6.1-1. A number of these system performance issues were identified in the pre-Project Scenario 1.

• Loading above the short-term emergency rating of the 138 kV transmission 876L was observed following the loss of the 138 kV transmission line 691L. The magnitude of this violation was greater than the thermal criteria violation that was observed in the pre-Project Scenario 1. Similar to the pre-Project Scenario 1, this thermal criteria violation can be mitigated by the Chestermere RAS.

• Loading above the short-term emergency rating of the 138 kV transmission line 691L was observed following a number of Category B contingencies, as follows:

o Loss of the 138 kV transmission line PCES01L. The magnitude of this violation was greater than the thermal criteria violation that was observed in the pre-Project Scenario 1.

o Loss of a 138/13.8 kV transformer at the Cavalier power plant. The magnitude of this violation was greater than the thermal criteria violation that was observed in the pre-Project Scenario 1.

o Loss of the 138 kV transmission line 876L. The magnitude of this violation was greater than the thermal criteria violation that was observed in the pre-Project Scenario 1.

o Loss of the 138 kV transmission line 434L (between the Foothills 237S and High River 65S substations). This violation was not observed in the pre-Project Scenario 1.

These thermal criteria violations can be managed by using the Chestermere RAS.

• Loading below the short-term emergency rating of the 138 kV transmission line 691L was observed following a number of Category B contingencies, as follows:

Page 31: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades

Page 29 Public R1-2016-07-27

o Loss of the 138 kV transmission line 646L (between the Foothills 237S and Okotoks 678S substations). This violation was not observed in the pre-Project Scenario 1.

o Loss of the 138 kV transmission line 753L (between the High River 65S and Blackie 253S substations). This violation was not observed in the pre-Project Scenario 1.

These thermal criteria violations can be managed by using real-time operational practices. Table 6.1-1: Summary of system performance before and after applying mitigation measures

(thermal loading) – Scenario 3 (Category B contingency conditions)

Contingency Limiting Branch

Seasonal Continuous

Thermal Rating (MVA)

Short-term Emergency

Rating (MVA)

Details of Constraints Mitigation

Load flow (MVA)

(Pre- / Post-Project)

% Loading(Pre- / Post-

Project)

Mitigation Measure

(Pre- / Post-Project)

Performance After

Applying Mitigation Measure

% Loading (Pre- / Post-

Project) 691L

(Janet 74S – planned

Chestermere 419S)

876L (Blackie 253S

– Gleichen 179S)

85 93.5 102.5 / 103.8

120 / 122

Chestermere RAS /

Chestermere RAS

69 / 73

434L (Foothills 237S - High River 65S

691L (Janet 74S –

planned Chestermere

419S)

85 93.5 NA / 98.4

NA / 116

NA / Chestermere

RAS

NA / 84

PCES01L (Namaka 428S

– Cavalier power plant)

691L (Janet 74S –

planned Chestermere

419S)

85 93.5 90.2 / 96.0

106 / 113

Real-time operational practices /

Chestermere RAS

<100% / 66

138/13.8 kV transformer at Cavalier power

plant

691L (Janet 74S –

planned Chestermere

419S)

85 93.5 90.2 / 95.9

106 / 113

Real-time operational practices /

Chestermere RAS

<100% / 66

876L (Blackie 253S – Gleichen 179S)

691L (Janet 74S –

planned Chestermere

419S)

85 93.5 91.4 / 94.6

107 / 111

Real-time operational practices /

Chestermere RAS

<100% / 80

646L (Foothills 237S

– Okotoks 678S)

691L (Janet 74S –

planned Chestermere

419S)

85 93.5 NA / 86.0

NA / 101

NA / Real-time

operational practices

NA / <100%

753L (High River 65S – Blackie 253S)

691L (Janet 74S –

planned Chestermere

419S)

85 93.5 NA / 85.5

NA / 101

NA / Real-time

operational practices

NA / <100%

The POD bus voltage deviations beyond the desired limits, which are also described below, are shown in Table 6.1-2.

Page 32: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades

Page 30 Public R1-2016-07-27

• POD bus voltage deviation at the planned Chestermere 419S substation was observed following the loss of the 138 kV transmission line 691L. As stated under Scenario 1, mitigation measures are not developed to address POD bus voltage deviations that exceed the desired values in Table 2.1-1. However, this system performance issue can be mitigated by the Chestermere RAS, which would be activated under the same system conditions that are associated with the thermal criteria violation observed on the 138 kV transmission line 876L following the loss of the 138 kV transmission line 691L. In other words, these observed POD bus voltage deviations can be mitigated as a byproduct of the Chestermere RAS.

Table 6.1-2: Summary of system performance before applying mitigation measures (POD bus voltage deviations) – Scenario 3 (Category B contingency conditions)*

Contingency Substation Name and Number

Bus No.

Nominal kV

Initial Voltage

(kV) (Pre- / Post-

Project)

Voltage Deviations for POD Busses Only

Post Transient

(kV) (Pre- / Post-

Project)

% Change (Pre- / Post-

Project)

Post Auto (kV)

% Change

Post Manual

(kV) %

Change

691L (Janet 74S –

planned Chestermere

419S)

(planned) Chestermere

419S

3949 25 25.4 / 25.16

22.8 / 22.02

10.1 / 12.5 -- -- -- --

4949 25 25.4 / 25.16

22.8 / 22.02

10.1 / 12.5 -- -- -- --

Note: This table does not summarize the system performance after applying mitigation measures. The effect of the Chestermere RAS would be to trip the load at the planned Chestermere 419S substation, after which no POD bus voltage deviation would be observed.

6.1.2. Scenario 4 (2017 WP, post-Project)

Category A conditions No Reliability Criteria violations were observed under Category A conditions. Category B contingency conditions A number of thermal criteria violations were observed under Category B contingency conditions. The thermal criteria violations and the applicable mitigation measures, which are also described below, are shown in Table 6.1-3. One of these system performance issues was identified in the pre-Project Scenario 2.

• Loading above the short-term emergency rating of the 138 kV transmission 876L was observed following the loss of the 138 kV transmission line 691L. The magnitude of this violation was greater than the thermal criteria violation that was observed in the pre-Project Scenario 2. This thermal criteria violation can be mitigated by the Chestermere RAS.

• Loading below the short-term emergency rating of the 138 kV transmission line 691L was observed following a number of Category B contingencies, as follows:

Page 33: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades

Page 31 Public R1-2016-07-27

o Loss of the 138 kV transmission line PCES01L. This violation was not observed in the pre-Project Scenario 2.

o Loss of a 138/13.8 kV transformer at the Cavalier power plant. This violation was not observed in the pre-Project Scenario 2.

o Loss of the 138 kV transmission line 434L. This violation was not observed in the pre-Project Scenario 2.

These thermal criteria violations can be managed by using real-time operational practices. Table 6.1-3: Summary of system performance before and after applying mitigation measures

(thermal loading) – Scenario 4 (Category B contingency conditions)

Contingency Limiting Branch

Seasonal Continuous

Thermal Rating (MVA)

Short-term Emergency

Rating (MVA)

Details of Constraints Mitigation

Load flow (MVA) (Pre- / Post-

Project)

% Loading (Pre- / Post-

Project)

Mitigation Measure

(Pre- / Post-Project)

Performance After

Applying Mitigation Measure

% Loading (Pre- / Post-

Project) 691L

(Janet 74S – planned

Chestermere 419S)

876L (Blackie 253S –

Gleichen 179S

90 99 96.1 / 99.9

107 / 111

Real-time operational practices /

Chestermere RAS

<100% / 64

434L (Foothills 237S - High River 65S)

691L (Janet 74S –

planned Chestermer

e 419S)

90 99 NA / 94.2

NA / 105

NA / Real-time

operational practices

NA / <100%

PCES01L (Namaka 428S – Cavalier Power

Plant

691L (Janet 74S –

planned Chestermer

e 419S)

90 99 NA / 92.5

NA / 103

NA / Real-time

operational practices

NA / <100%

138/13.8 kV transformer at Cavalier power

plant

691L (Janet 74S –

planned Chestermer

e 419S)

90 99 NA / 92.4

NA / 103

NA / Real-time

operational practices

NA / <100%

6.2. Voltage Stability

Voltage stability analysis was conducted using Scenario 4 to investigate the system active power margins after the Project under Category A conditions and under Category B contingency conditions. The voltage stability diagrams are provided in Attachment C.

6.2.1. Scenario 4 (2017 WP, post-Project)

For Scenario 4, the reference load level in the Study Area is 282.7 MW. The minimum incremental load transfer for the Category B contingencies is 5.0% of the reference load, or 14.135 MW, to meet the voltage stability criteria (282.7 MW x 0.05 = 14.135 MW). Table 6.2-1 summarizes the voltage stability results for Category A and for the five worst contingencies under Category B system conditions. The voltage stability margin was met for all conditions.

Page 34: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades

Page 32 Public R1-2016-07-27

Table 6.2-1: Voltage stability analysis results – Scenario 4 (Minimum transfer = 14.135 MW)

Contingency From To Maximum

incremental transfer (MW)

Meets 105% transfer criteria?

N-G-0 System normal 170 Yes

691L Janet 74S Chestermere 419S 40 Yes

434L High River 65S Foothills 237S 70 Yes

646L Foothills 237S Okotoks 678S 130 Yes

733L Namaka 428S Gleichen 179S 140 Yes

876L Gleichen 179S Blackie 253S 150 Yes

6.3. Results Summary

The Reliability Criteria violations observed during the connection assessment studies are summarized in Table 6.3-1.

Table 6.3-1: Project impact and mitigation measures

Identified Reliability Criteria Violation Occurrence

Impact Level

of Project

System Conditio

n

Mitigation Measures

(Pre- and Post-Project) Violation Contingency

Thermal criteria violation on the 138 kV transmission line 876L

(Blackie 253S – Gleichen 179S)

691L (Janet 74S – planned Chestermere 419S)

Pre-Project and Post-Project Marginal 2017 SP

Pre: Chestermere RAS

Post: Same as pre-Project

Pre-Project and Post-Project Significant 2017 WP

Pre: Real-time operational practices

Post: Chestermere RAS

Thermal criteria violation on the 138 kV transmission line 691L (Janet 74S – planned Chestermere 419S)

PCES01L (Namaka 428S –

Cavalier power plant)

Pre-Project and Post-Project Significant 2017 SP

Pre: Real-time operational practices Post: Chestermere RAS

Post-Project only

Significant 2017 WP Pre: None required Post: Real-time operational practices

138/13.8 kV transformer at the Cavalier power

plant

Pre-Project and Post-Project Significant 2017 SP

Pre: Real-time operational practices

Post: Chestermere RAS

Post-Project only

Significant 2017 WP Pre: None required

Post: Real-time operational practices

Pre-Project and Post-Project Significant 2017 SP Pre: Real-time operational

practices

Page 35: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades

Page 33 Public R1-2016-07-27

Identified Reliability Criteria Violation Occurrence

Impact Level

of Project

System Conditio

n

Mitigation Measures

(Pre- and Post-Project) Violation Contingency

876L (Blackie 253S – Gleichen 179S)

Post: Chestermere RAS

434L (Foothills 237S - High

River 65S)

Post-Project only

Significant 2017 SP Pre: None required

Post: Chestermere RAS

434L (Foothills 237S - High

River 65S)

Post-Project only

Significant 2017 WP Pre: None required

Post: Real-time operational practices

646L (Foothills 237S – Okotoks 678S)

Post-Project only

Significant 2017 SP

Pre: None required

Post: Real-time operational practices

753L (High River 65S –

Blackie 253S)

Post-Project only

Significant 2017 SP

Pre: None required

Post: Real-time operational practices

The power flow study results identified post-Project system performance issues under Category B contingency conditions. Real-time operational practices and the Chestermere RAS can be used to mitigate all of the pre-Project and post-Project system performance issues. The post-Project voltage stability analysis confirms that the voltage stability margin of the Study Area was met under all studied conditions. Based on the studies results, Alternative 2 is technically viable.

Page 36: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades

Page 34 Public R1-2016-07-27

7. Project Interdependencies No project interdependencies were identified.

Page 37: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades

Page 35 Public R1-2016-07-27

8. Conclusions and Recommendations Based on the study results, Alternative 2 is technically viable. The connection assessment identified a number of pre-Project and post-Project system performance issues. Real-time operational practices and the Chestermere RAS can be used to mitigate all of the pre- and post-Project system performance issues. The Project does not impact the effectiveness of existing RASs in the Study Area, nor does the Project create new RASs in the Study Area. This report demonstrated that the Chestermere RAS, which is associated with Project 1631, can be used to mitigate a number of system performance issues that were identified in the pre-Project and post-Project assessments. However, the Chestermere RAS would not be required for the purposes of the Project if the Project were energized before Project 1631, given that any remaining post-Project system performance issues could be managed by using real-time operational practices, as required. Therefore, the energization of the Project is not dependent on the energization of Project 1631. It is recommended to proceed with the Project using Alternative 2 as the preferred alternative to respond to the DFO’s request for system access service. It is also recommended to use real-time operational practices and the Chestermere RAS to mitigate the identified system performance issues. The minimum transformation capacity required for the 138/25 kV transformer in Alternative 2 is 28 MVA. A transformer size of 42 MVA would be recommended based on good electric industry practice and under advisement from the legal owner of transmission facilities regarding its asset management and inventory practices.

Page 38: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades

Transmission Project Delivery

R[x] 36

Public R2-2016-07-27

Attachment A

Pre-Project Power Flow Diagrams (Scenarios 1 to 2)

Page 39: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Table 1: Summary of System Performance without Applying Mitigation (Element Loading) - 2017 SP Pre-Project Category B

Table 2: Summary of System Performance without Applying Mitigation (Element Loading) - 2017 WP Pre-Project Category B

Contingency Thermal Overloads Overloa

d

%

Figure in Attachment

A

N-G: Normal Operation None -- A-1

691L Janet 74S to Chestermere 419S

876L Blackie 253S – Gleichen 179S

120 A-2

434L High River 65S to Foothills 237S None -- A-3

646L Okotoks 678S to Foothills 237S None -- A-4

753L High River 65S to Blackie 253S None -- A-5

PCES01L Namaka 428S to Cavalier Power Plant

691L Janet 74S – Chestermere 419S

106 A-6

Cavalier transformer 691L Janet 74S – Chestermere 419S

106 A-7

876L Blackie 253S to Gleichen 179S

691L Janet 74S – Chestermere 419S

107 A-8

733L Namaka 428S to Gleichen 179S None - A-9

Contingency Thermal Overloads Overloa

d

%

Figure in Attachment

A

N-G: Normal Operation None -- A-10

691L Janet 74S to Chestermere 419S

876L Blackie 253S – Gleichen 179S

107 A-11

434L High River 65S to Foothills 237S None -- A-12

646L Okotoks 678S to Foothills 237S None -- A-13

753L High River 65S to Blackie 253S None -- A-14

Page 40: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Table 3: Summary of System Performance with Mitigation (Element Loading) - 2017 SP Pre-Project Category B

Table 4: Summary of System Performance with Mitigation (Element Loading) - 2017 WP Pre-Project Category B

PCES01L Namaka 428S to Cavalier Power Plant None -- A-15

Cavalier transformer None -- A-16 876L Blackie 253S to Gleichen 179S None -- A-17

733L Namaka 428S to Gleichen 179S None -- A-18

Contingency Thermal Overloads

Overload

%

Mitigation Approach

Post Mitigation

Performance

%

Loading

Figure in Attachment

A

691L Janet 74S to Chestermere 419S

876L Blackie 253S – Gleichen 179S

120 Project 1631 SPS

69 A-19

PCES01L Namaka 428S to Cavalier Power Plant

691L Janet 74S – Chestermere 419S

106 Real-time operational

practice

N/A N/A

Cavalier transformer 691L Janet 74S – Chestermere 419S

106 Real-time operational

practice

N/A N/A

876L Blackie 253S to Gleichen 179S

691L Janet 74S – Chestermere 419S

107 Real-time operational

practice

N/A N/A

Contingency Thermal Overloads

Overload

%

Mitigation Approach

Post Mitigation

Performance

%

Loading

Figure in Attachment

A

691L Janet 74S to Chestermere 419S

876L Blackie 253S – Gleichen 179S

107

Real-time operational

practice

N/A N/A

Page 41: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Okotoks 678S and

2017 SP

P1670 PRE-CONNECTION - DIAGRAM A-1N-0: NORMAL OPERATIONTHU, MAY 26 2016 12:39

Okotoks 678S Substation

High River 65S Upgrades

434L

646L

753L

727L

727L

850L

691L

876L

733L

Bus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate A1.105OV 0.899UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

617FOOTHLL1

1.05252.4

643SC1D

1.05252.4

653SC1B

1.05252.4

544ENMX65S4

1.05252.3

35.

7

4.8

35.8

10.1

35.

7

4.8

35.8

10.

120.7

10.5

20.

7

2.920.7

10.5

20.

7

2.9

640FOOTHLL2

1.04143.0

56.4

7.7

1.0125 56.4

7.7

1.0125

239OKOTOKS7

1.02141.4

242HIGH RI7

1.02141.4

40.5

5.7

40.9

4.6

71.

4

8.0

72.0

8.8

253BLACKIE7

1.03141.6

886MAG TAP7

1.02141.4

960HART TAP

1.02140.7

19.9

11.

9

19.7

9.6

0.7

0.4

0.7

0.8

10.6

1.8

10.6

3.6

0.7

1.5

0.7

1.0

238BLACK D7

1.02140.5

243HARTELL7

1.02140.7

9.6

3.4

9.7

2.9

0.9

0.7

0.9

0.7

254GLEICHE7

1.03142.8

252CARSELA7

1.02140.6

18.9 18.6

13.4

0.8

9.1

0.8

21.0

3.3

20.8

0.7

5251WYNDHAM

1.02140.7

13.9

9.6

13.9

9.5

340NAMAKA 7

1.04143.9

5.8

17.8

5.7

16.4

247CAVALIER

1.05144.5

259STRATHM7

1.04143.2

315HUSSAR

1.03142.3

24.9

43.4

24.8

44.0

18.1

4.6

18.2

2.0

5247CAV T101

1.05144.8

24.9

43.4

1

8.8

17.3

8.8

16.2

6.7

240MAGCAN 7

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.2

1.02141.4

547ENMX54S7

1.02140.6

570ENMX65S7

1.02141.0

96.8

0.9

97.1

1.8

150.9

13.1

1.02

5

149.4

13.0

1.02

5

589ENMX26S7

1.02140.7

590ENMX24S7

1.02140.8

90.0

3.2

89.8

4.1

112.9

13.6

112.8

12.8

16.3

949 1.02140.8

29.

7

36.3

30.4

36.

7

207JANET 7

71.9

11.

7

71.

2

12.4

134.

4

28.4

134.0

27.2

1.03141.6

SW

0.0

0.0

0.0

SW

9.8

SW

0.0

26.

2

SW

4242HIGH RI9

1.0526.2

2242HIGH RA9

1.0426.1

15.8

7.2

0.956115

.8

7.2

0.9561

13.2 5.1

2.5

1.0

2.5

1.0

13.2

5.1

4241BLACK D1

1.0325.9

9.6

3.4

0.94

007

9.6

2.8

4238BLACK D9

1.0425.9

9.6

3.4

1.03

64

9.6

2.8

3252CARSELA9

1.0325.7

11.9

4.4

1.03

25

7.9

2.4

3.9

1.2

3239OKOTOKS8

1.0225.4

4239OKOTOKS9

1.0325.8

9.4

5.1

0.98

983

9.5

5.4

1.03

64

9.4

4.7

9.4

4.7

3547ENMX54S9

1.0425.9

17.2

6.9

0.95

853

30.0

0

17.1

5.6

524265ST1

1.0672.8

10.0

3.4

0.9625

236HIGH RI8

1.0371.1

10.0

3.1

0.97

5

241BLACK D8

0.9968.3

10.0

3.1

9.6

3.4

4243HARTELL9

1.064.4

0.9

0.7

0.95

652

30.0

0

0.9

0.6

4252CARSLAND

1.0214.1

23.7

13.6

-30.

00

1.05

26

7.8

3.5

15.7

7.2

3251CARSELA2

1.0214.1

4251CARSELA1

1.0414.4

0.6

0.3

30.0

0

1

14.6

10.6

30.0

01

0.6

0.3

0.6

0.3

15.2

10.9R

3247CAVAL_A

1.0113.9 4247

CAVAL_B

1.0113.9

12.9

22.8

0.93

176

-30.

00

12.1

22.7

0.93

176

-30.

00

1.3

0.7

14.1

23.5R

2.0

1.0

14.1

23.7R

0.0

0.0R

1

Page 42: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Okotoks 678S and

2017 SP

P1670 PRE-CONNECTION - DIAGRAM A-2N-1: 691L JANET 74S TO CHESTERMERE 419STHU, MAY 26 2016 12:40

Okotoks 678S Substation

High River 65S Upgrades

434L

646L

753L

727L

727L

850L

691L

876L

733L

Bus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate A1.105OV 0.899UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

617FOOTHLL1

1.05251.5

643SC1D

1.05251.7

653SC1B

1.05251.7

544ENMX65S4

1.05251.9

42.

4

6.5

42.4

8.2

42.

4

6.5

42.4

8.2

56.9

6.3

56.

8

6.456.9

6.3

56.

8

6.4

640FOOTHLL2

1.03142.2

99.2

12.9

1.0125 99.2

12.9

1.0125

239OKOTOKS7

1.01139.7

242HIGH RI7

1.01139.7

70.7

5.5

71.7

6.9

124

.9

7.2

126.

7

12.5

253BLACKIE7

0.99137.2

886MAG TAP7

1.01139.7

960HART TAP

1.01139.0

74.6

13.

5

72.0

16.5

1.8

1.0

1.8

1.4

10.6

1.9

10.6

3.6

1.8

2.1

1.8

1.6

238BLACK D7

1.01138.8

243HARTELL7

1.01139.0

9.6

3.4

9.7

2.9

0.9

0.7

0.9

0.7

254GLEICHE7

0.98134.6

252CARSELA7

1.00137.6

99.2 93.1

33.9

27.5

8.6

27.2

50.0

2.9

49.1

2.6

5251WYNDHAM

1.00137.7

13.9

12.2

13.9

12.1

340NAMAKA 7

0.98134.9

80.3

38.4

78.1

41.8

247CAVALIER

0.98135.8

259STRATHM7

0.96132.4

315HUSSAR

0.96133.0

24.8

66.5

24.7

66.8

18.1

6.1

18.3

3.9

5247CAV T101

0.99136.3

24.8

66.5

1

62.6

10.5

63.4

11.3

7.1

240MAGCAN 7

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.2

1.01139.7

547ENMX54S7

1.02140.3

570ENMX65S7

1.02140.8

94.5

0.9

94.7

1.8

141.2

13.0

1.02

5

139.9

12.9

1.02

5

589ENMX26S7

1.02140.4

590ENMX24S7

1.02140.6

76.9

1.9

76.7

2.4

109.2

13.8

109.1

13.0

23.5

949 0.92127.6

41.7

25.5

40.

8

25.

2

207JANET 7

157.

5

24.9

157.0

23.0

1.02141.3

SW

0.0

0.0

0.0

SW

8.5

SW

0.0

22.

4

SW

4242HIGH RI9

1.0325.8

2242HIGH RA9

1.0325.8

15.8

7.2

0.956115

.8

7.2

0.9561

13.2 5.1

2.5

1.0

2.5

1.0

13.2

5.1

4241BLACK D1

1.0225.5

9.6

3.4

0.94

007

9.6

2.8

4238BLACK D9

1.0225.6

9.6

3.4

1.03

64

9.6

2.8

3252CARSELA9

1.0125.2

11.9

4.4

1.03

25

7.9

2.4

3.9

1.2

3239OKOTOKS8

1.0025.1

4239OKOTOKS9

1.0225.5

9.4

5.1

0.98

983

9.5

5.4

1.03

64

9.4

4.7

9.4

4.7

3547ENMX54S9

1.0325.9

17.2

6.9

0.95

853

30.0

0

17.1

5.6

524265ST1

1.0471.9

10.0

3.4

0.9625

236HIGH RI8

1.0270.2

10.0

3.2

0.97

5

241BLACK D8

0.9867.3

10.0

3.2

9.6

3.4

4243HARTELL9

1.054.4

0.9

0.7

0.95

652

30.0

0

0.9

0.6

4252CARSLAND

1.0013.7

23.7

13.8

-30.

00

1.05

26

7.8

3.5

15.7

7.2

3251CARSELA2

1.0013.8

4251CARSELA1

1.0214.1

0.6

0.3

30.0

0

1

14.6

13.3

30.0

01

0.6

0.3

0.6

0.3

15.2

13.6H

3247CAVAL_A

0.9713.3 4247

CAVAL_B

0.9813.5

12.8

30.3

0.93

176

-30.

00

12.1

40.9

0.93

176

-30.

00

1.3

0.7

14.1

31.0H

2.0

1.0

14.1

31.0H

0.0

10.9H

1

Page 43: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Okotoks 678S and

2017 SP

P1670 PRE-CONNECTION - DIAGRAM A-3N-1: 434L HIGH RIVER 65S TO FOOTHILLS 237STHU, MAY 26 2016 12:40

Okotoks 678S Substation

High River 65S Upgrades

434L

646L

753L

727L

727L

850L

691L

876L

733L

Bus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate A1.105OV 0.899UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

617FOOTHLL1

1.05252.3

643SC1D

1.05252.4

653SC1B

1.05252.4

544ENMX65S4

1.05252.3

35.

0

5.2

35.0

9.8

35.

0

5.2

35.0

9.8

15.7

9.6

15.

7

3.815.7

9.6

15.

7

3.8

640FOOTHLL2

1.04142.9

50.6

9.0

1.0125 50.6

9.0

1.0125

239OKOTOKS7

1.01138.8

242HIGH RI7

1.00137.4

99.3

11.1

101.

2

16.3

253BLACKIE7

1.01139.0

886MAG TAP7

1.00138.1

960HART TAP

0.99136.6

4.9

14.

8

4.8

12.3

57.

1

5.1

57.3

5.2

10.6

2.0

10.6

3.7

57.6

5.1

57.3

5.0

238BLACK D7

0.99136.4

243HARTELL7

0.99136.6

9.6

3.4

9.7

3.0

0.9

0.7

0.9

0.7

254GLEICHE7

1.03141.5

252CARSELA7

1.00138.1

5.8 5.6

15.0

1.0

8.2

1.0

22.8

4.5

22.6

2.2

5251WYNDHAM

1.00138.2

13.9

12.2

13.9

12.1

340NAMAKA 7

1.04143.2

7.2

19.5

7.3

18.1

247CAVALIER

1.04143.8

259STRATHM7

1.03142.6

315HUSSAR

1.03141.6

24.9

48.7

24.8

49.2

18.1

4.7

18.2

2.1

5247CAV T101

1.04144.2

24.9

48.7

1

21.9

20.4

21.8

19.5

5.8

240MAGCAN 7

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.2

1.00138.1

547ENMX54S7

1.02140.5

570ENMX65S7

1.02141.0

97.2

0.8

97.5

1.8

152.5

13.1

1.02

5

151.0

12.9

1.02

5

589ENMX26S7

1.02140.7

590ENMX24S7

1.02140.8

92.3

3.5

92.0

4.4

113.5

13.6

113.3

12.7

18.1

949 1.02140.6

42.

8

39.2

43.9

38.

8

207JANET 7

85.6

13.

1

84.

7

14.5

130.

1

29.0

129.7

27.9

1.03141.6

SW

0.0

0.0

0.0

SW

9.7

SW

0.0

26.

0

SW

4242HIGH RI9

1.0125.4

2242HIGH RA9

1.0125.3

15.8

7.2

0.956115

.8

7.3

0.9561

13.2 5.1

2.5

1.0

2.5

1.0

13.2

5.1

4241BLACK D1

1.0025.0

9.6

3.4

0.94

007

9.6

2.8

4238BLACK D9

1.0125.1

9.6

3.4

1.03

64

9.6

2.8

3252CARSELA9

1.0125.3

11.9

4.4

1.03

25

7.9

2.4

3.9

1.2

3239OKOTOKS8

1.0024.9

4239OKOTOKS9

1.0125.3

9.4

5.1

0.98

983

9.5

5.4

1.03

64

9.4

4.7

9.4

4.7

3547ENMX54S9

1.0425.9

17.2

6.9

0.95

853

30.0

0

17.1

5.6

524265ST1

1.0270.7

10.0

3.5

0.9625

236HIGH RI8

1.0069.0

10.0

3.2

0.97

5

241BLACK D8

0.9666.1

10.0

3.2

9.6

3.4

4243HARTELL9

1.034.3

0.9

0.7

0.95

652

30.0

0

0.9

0.6

4252CARSLAND

1.0013.8

23.7

13.7

-30.

00

1.05

26

7.8

3.5

15.7

7.2

3251CARSELA2

1.0013.8

4251CARSELA1

1.0314.2

0.6

0.3

30.0

0

1

14.6

13.3

30.0

01

0.6

0.3

0.6

0.3

15.2

13.6H

3247CAVAL_A

1.0113.9 4247

CAVAL_B

1.0113.9

12.8

25.6

0.93

176

-30.

00

12.1

25.5

0.93

176

-30.

00

1.3

0.7

14.1

26.3R

2.0

1.0

14.1

26.5R

0.0

0.0R

1

Page 44: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Okotoks 678S and

2017 SP

P1670 PRE-CONNECTION - DIAGRAM A-4N-1: 646L OKOTOKS 678S TO FOOTHILLS 237STHU, MAY 26 2016 12:40

Okotoks 678S Substation

High River 65S Upgrades

434L

646L

753L

727L

727L

850L

691L

876L

733L

Bus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate A1.105OV 0.899UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

617FOOTHLL1

1.05252.4

643SC1D

1.05252.4

653SC1B

1.05252.4

544ENMX65S4

1.05252.3

35.

5

5.0

35.5

10.0

35.

5

5.0

35.5

10.

019.0

10.1

19.

0

3.419.0

10.1

19.

0

3.4

640FOOTHLL2

1.04142.9

54.4

8.3

1.0125 54.4

8.3

1.0125

239OKOTOKS7

1.01139.6

242HIGH RI7

1.02140.5

107

.6

11.

2

108.

9

14.8

253BLACKIE7

1.02140.8

886MAG TAP7

1.01140.1

960HART TAP

1.01139.8

20.8

12.

4

20.6

10.2

34.5

4.0

34.5

4.3

10.6

1.8

10.6

3.6

34.4

4.7

34.5

4.5

238BLACK D7

1.01139.6

243HARTELL7

1.01139.8

9.6

3.4

9.7

2.9

0.9

0.7

0.9

0.7

254GLEICHE7

1.03142.4

252CARSELA7

1.01139.5

14.3 14.1

13.8

6.2

9.0

6.3

15.5

5.8

15.4

3.1

5251WYNDHAM

1.01139.6

13.9

12.2

13.9

12.1

340NAMAKA 7

1.04143.7

1.3

18.3

1.3

16.8

247CAVALIER

1.05144.3

259STRATHM7

1.04143.0

315HUSSAR

1.03142.1

24.9

45.0

24.8

45.7

18.1

4.7

18.2

2.0

5247CAV T101

1.05144.6

24.9

45.0

1

13.3

18.4

13.2

17.4

6.7

240MAGCAN 7

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.2

1.01140.1

547ENMX54S7

1.02140.6

570ENMX65S7

1.02141.0

96.9

0.9

97.2

1.8

151.4

13.1

1.02

5

150.0

12.9

1.02

5

589ENMX26S7

1.02140.7

590ENMX24S7

1.02140.8

90.7

3.3

90.5

4.2

113.1

13.6

113.0

12.8

16.8

949 1.02140.7

34.

2

37.3

35.0

37.

5

207JANET 7

76.6

12.

3

75.

8

13.2

132.

9

28.6

132.6

27.5

1.03141.6

SW

0.0

0.0

0.0

SW

9.7

SW

0.0

26.

1

SW

4242HIGH RI9

1.0426.0

2242HIGH RA9

1.0425.9

15.8

7.2

0.956115

.8

7.2

0.9561

13.2 5.1

2.5

1.0

2.5

1.0

13.2

5.1

4241BLACK D1

1.0325.7

9.6

3.4

0.94

007

9.6

2.8

4238BLACK D9

1.0325.8

9.6

3.4

1.03

64

9.6

2.8

3252CARSELA9

1.0225.5

11.9

4.4

1.03

25

7.9

2.4

3.9

1.2

3239OKOTOKS8

1.0025.1

4239OKOTOKS9

1.0225.5

9.4

5.1

0.98

983

9.5

5.4

1.03

64

9.4

4.7

9.4

4.7

3547ENMX54S9

1.0425.9

17.2

6.9

0.95

853

30.0

0

17.1

5.6

524265ST1

1.0572.3

10.0

3.4

0.9625

236HIGH RI8

1.0270.6

10.0

3.2

0.97

5

241BLACK D8

0.9867.8

10.0

3.2

9.6

3.4

4243HARTELL9

1.054.4

0.9

0.7

0.95

652

30.0

0

0.9

0.6

4252CARSLAND

1.0114.0

23.7

13.7

-30.

00

1.05

26

7.8

3.5

15.7

7.2

3251CARSELA2

1.0113.9

4251CARSELA1

1.0414.3

0.6

0.3

30.0

0

1

14.6

13.3

30.0

01

0.6

0.3

0.6

0.3

15.2

13.6H

3247CAVAL_A

1.0113.9 4247

CAVAL_B

1.0113.9

12.9

23.7

0.93

176

-30.

00

12.1

23.5

0.93

176

-30.

00

1.3

0.7

14.1

24.4R

2.0

1.0

14.1

24.5R

0.0

0.0R

1

Page 45: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Okotoks 678S and

2017 SP

P1670 PRE-CONNECTION - DIAGRAM A-5N-1: 753L HIGH RIVER 65S TO BLACKIE 253STHU, MAY 26 2016 12:40

Okotoks 678S Substation

High River 65S Upgrades

434L

646L

753L

727L

727L

850L

691L

876L

733L

Bus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate A1.105OV 0.899UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

617FOOTHLL1

1.05252.2

643SC1D

1.05252.3

653SC1B

1.05252.3

544ENMX65S4

1.05252.2

35.

2

5.6

35.3

9.4

35.

2

5.6

35.3

9.4

17.7

8.4

17.

7

5.017.7

8.4

17.

7

5.0

640FOOTHLL2

1.03142.7

52.9

10.6

1.0125 52.9

10.6

1.0125

239OKOTOKS7

1.02141.0

242HIGH RI7

1.02141.0

41.8

6.6

42.1

5.6

63.

2

13.

4

63.7

13.8

253BLACKIE7

1.03141.7

886MAG TAP7

1.02141.0

960HART TAP

1.02140.3

11.1

6.2

11.0

5.8

10.6

1.8

10.6

3.6

11.0

5.1

11.0

5.6

238BLACK D7

1.01140.1

243HARTELL7

1.02140.3

9.6

3.4

9.7

2.9

0.9

0.7

0.9

0.7

254GLEICHE7

1.03142.8

252CARSELA7

1.02140.5

11.8 11.6

9.9

11.9

15.4

11.8

33.9

9.1

33.5

7.3

5251WYNDHAM

1.02140.6

13.9

10.0

13.9

9.9

340NAMAKA 7

1.04143.9

1.1

14.4

1.2

12.8

247CAVALIER

1.05144.5

259STRATHM7

1.04143.1

315HUSSAR

1.03142.3

24.9

43.4

24.8

44.0

18.1

4.6

18.2

2.0

5247CAV T101

1.05144.8

24.9

43.4

1

15.8

20.7

15.7

19.7

13.2

240MAGCAN 7

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.2

1.02141.0

547ENMX54S7

1.02140.5

570ENMX65S7

1.02141.0

97.0

0.8

97.3

1.7

151.7

12.8

1.02

5

150.3

12.6

1.02

5

589ENMX26S7

1.02140.7

590ENMX24S7

1.02140.8

91.2

3.8

91.0

4.7

113.2

13.5

113.1

12.6

13.2

949 1.02140.8

36.

7

39.7

37.6

39.

6

207JANET 7

79.2

14.

2

78.

4

15.3

132.

1

29.4

131.8

28.2

1.03141.6

SW

0.0

0.0

0.0

SW

9.8

SW

0.0

26.

2

SW

4242HIGH RI9

1.0426.1

2242HIGH RA9

1.0426.0

15.8

7.2

0.956115

.8

7.2

0.9561

13.2 5.1

2.5

1.0

2.5

1.0

13.2

5.1

4241BLACK D1

1.0325.8

9.6

3.4

0.94

007

9.6

2.8

4238BLACK D9

1.0325.8

9.6

3.4

1.03

64

9.6

2.8

3252CARSELA9

1.0325.7

11.9

4.4

1.03

25

7.9

2.4

3.9

1.2

3239OKOTOKS8

1.0125.3

4239OKOTOKS9

1.0325.7

9.4

5.1

0.98

983

9.5

5.4

1.03

64

9.4

4.7

9.4

4.7

3547ENMX54S9

1.0425.9

17.2

6.9

0.95

853

30.0

0

17.1

5.6

524265ST1

1.0572.6

10.0

3.4

0.9625

236HIGH RI8

1.0370.9

10.0

3.1

0.97

5

241BLACK D8

0.9968.0

10.0

3.1

9.6

3.4

4243HARTELL9

1.064.4

0.9

0.7

0.95

652

30.0

0

0.9

0.6

4252CARSLAND

1.0214.1

23.7

13.7

-30.

00

1.05

26

7.8

3.5

15.7

7.2

3251CARSELA2

1.0214.0

4251CARSELA1

1.0414.4

0.6

0.3

30.0

0

1

14.6

11.0

30.0

01

0.6

0.3

0.6

0.3

15.2

11.3R

3247CAVAL_A

1.0113.9 4247

CAVAL_B

1.0113.9

12.9

22.8

0.93

176

-30.

00

12.1

22.7

0.93

176

-30.

00

1.3

0.7

14.1

23.5R

2.0

1.0

14.1

23.7R

0.0

0.0R

1

Page 46: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Okotoks 678S and

2017 SP

P1670 PRE-CONNECTION - DIAGRAM A-6N-1: PCES01L NAMAKA 428S TO CAVALIER POWER PLANTTHU, MAY 26 2016 12:40

Okotoks 678S Substation

High River 65S Upgrades

434L

646L

753L

727L

727L

850L

691L

876L

733L

Bus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate A1.105OV 0.899UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

617FOOTHLL1

1.05250.9

643SC1D

1.05251.3

653SC1B

1.05251.3

544ENMX65S4

1.05251.2

37.

1

8.7

37.2

6.0

37.

1

8.7

37.2

6.0

23.5

5.6

23.

5

7.623.5

5.6

23.

5

7.6

640FOOTHLL2

1.03141.7

60.7

16.3

1.0125 60.7

16.3

1.0125

239OKOTOKS7

1.01139.5

242HIGH RI7

1.01139.5

43.5

11.3

43.9

10.6

76.

7

18.

3

77.4

19.7

253BLACKIE7

1.00137.9

886MAG TAP7

1.01139.5

960HART TAP

1.01138.7

25.5

1.2

25.2

0.9

1.0

0.2

1.0

0.2

10.6

1.9

10.6

3.6

1.0

0.8

1.0

0.4

238BLACK D7

1.00138.5

243HARTELL7

1.01138.7

9.6

3.4

9.7

2.9

0.9

0.7

0.9

0.7

254GLEICHE7

0.98135.2

252CARSELA7

1.00137.9

27.0 26.6

3.6

1.8

2.0

1.8

23.7

1.6

23.4

3.9

5251WYNDHAM

1.00137.9

13.9

12.2

13.9

12.1

340NAMAKA 7

0.98134.7

13.8

1.0

13.8

0.4

247CAVALIER

1.05144.5

259STRATHM7

0.99136.3

315HUSSAR

0.96132.8

18.1

6.2

18.3

4.0

5247CAV T101

1.05144.8

1

25.8

12.5

25.6

13.2

0.3

240MAGCAN 7

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.2

1.01139.5

547ENMX54S7

1.01139.8

570ENMX65S7

1.02140.3

96.7

1.0

97.0

2.0

151.9

15.9

1.02

5

150.5

15.7

1.02

5

589ENMX26S7

1.01139.9

590ENMX24S7

1.01139.9

92.0

1.0

91.8

0.0

113.1

14.4

113.0

13.6

1.2

949 1.00138.0

46.

7

3.9

47.4

4.1

207JANET 7

89.3

22.1

88.

2

20.

4

128.

7

19.5

128.4

18.5

1.02140.6

SW

0.0

0.0

0.0

SW

8.5

SW

0.0

23.

7

SW

4242HIGH RI9

1.0325.8

2242HIGH RA9

1.0325.7

15.8

7.2

0.956115

.8

7.2

0.9561

13.2 5.1

2.5

1.0

2.5

1.0

13.2

5.1

4241BLACK D1

1.0225.4

9.6

3.4

0.94

007

9.6

2.8

4238BLACK D9

1.0225.5

9.6

3.4

1.03

64

9.6

2.8

3252CARSELA9

1.0125.2

11.9

4.4

1.03

25

7.9

2.4

3.9

1.2

3239OKOTOKS8

1.0025.0

4239OKOTOKS9

1.0225.4

9.4

5.1

0.98

983

9.5

5.4

1.03

64

9.4

4.7

9.4

4.7

3547ENMX54S9

1.0325.8

17.2

6.9

0.95

853

30.0

0

17.1

5.6

524265ST1

1.0471.8

10.0

3.4

0.9625

236HIGH RI8

1.0270.1

10.0

3.2

0.97

5

241BLACK D8

0.9767.2

10.0

3.2

9.6

3.4

4243HARTELL9

1.054.3

0.9

0.7

0.95

652

30.0

0

0.9

0.6

4252CARSLAND

1.0013.8

23.7

13.8

-30.

00

1.05

26

7.8

3.5

15.7

7.2

3251CARSELA2

1.0013.8

4251CARSELA1

1.0314.2

0.6

0.3

30.0

0

1

14.6

13.3

30.0

01

0.6

0.3

0.6

0.3

15.2

13.6H

3247CAVAL_A

1.0113.9 4247

CAVAL_B

1.0113.9

0.93

176

-30.

00

0.93

176

-30.

00

1

Page 47: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Okotoks 678S and

2017 SP

P1670 PRE-CONNECTION - DIAGRAM A-7N-1: CAVALIER TRANSFORMERTHU, MAY 26 2016 12:40

Okotoks 678S Substation

High River 65S Upgrades

434L

646L

753L

727L

727L

850L

691L

876L

733L

Bus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate A1.105OV 0.899UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

617FOOTHLL1

1.05251.0

643SC1D

1.05251.3

653SC1B

1.05251.3

544ENMX65S4

1.05251.2

37.

1

8.7

37.2

6.1

37.

1

8.7

37.2

6.1

23.5

5.7

23.

5

7.523.5

5.7

23.

5

7.5

640FOOTHLL2

1.03141.8

60.7

16.2

1.0125 60.7

16.2

1.0125

239OKOTOKS7

1.01139.5

242HIGH RI7

1.01139.5

43.5

11.2

43.9

10.4

76.

7

18.

1

77.4

19.5

253BLACKIE7

1.00137.9

886MAG TAP7

1.01139.5

960HART TAP

1.01138.8

25.5

1.3

25.2

0.7

1.0

0.2

1.0

0.2

10.6

1.9

10.6

3.6

1.0

0.8

1.0

0.4

238BLACK D7

1.00138.6

243HARTELL7

1.01138.8

9.6

3.4

9.7

2.9

0.9

0.7

0.9

0.7

254GLEICHE7

0.98135.3

252CARSELA7

1.00137.9

27.0 26.6

3.3

1.8

2.1

1.8

23.7

1.5

23.5

3.9

5251WYNDHAM

1.00138.0

13.9

12.2

13.9

12.1

340NAMAKA 7

0.98134.9

13.8

1.2

13.8

0.1

247CAVALIER

0.98134.9

259STRATHM7

0.99136.4

315HUSSAR

0.96132.9

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.7

18.1

6.1

18.3

3.9

5247CAV T101

1.05144.8

1

25.7

12.0

25.6

12.7

0.2

240MAGCAN 7

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.2

1.01139.5

547ENMX54S7

1.01139.8

570ENMX65S7

1.02140.3

96.7

1.0

97.0

2.0

151.9

15.8

1.02

5

150.5

15.7

1.02

5

589ENMX26S7

1.01139.9

590ENMX24S7

1.01139.9

92.0

0.9

91.8

0.1

113.1

14.4

113.0

13.5

0.9

949 1.00138.0

46.

6

4.4

47.4

4.7

207JANET 7

89.3

21.6

88.

2

19.

8

128.

7

19.6

128.4

18.6

1.02140.6

SW

0.0

0.0

0.0

SW

8.5

SW

0.0

23.

8

SW

4242HIGH RI9

1.0325.8

2242HIGH RA9

1.0325.7

15.8

7.2

0.956115

.8

7.2

0.9561

13.2 5.1

2.5

1.0

2.5

1.0

13.2

5.1

4241BLACK D1

1.0225.5

9.6

3.4

0.94

007

9.6

2.8

4238BLACK D9

1.0225.6

9.6

3.4

1.03

64

9.6

2.8

3252CARSELA9

1.0125.2

11.9

4.4

1.03

25

7.9

2.4

3.9

1.2

3239OKOTOKS8

1.0025.0

4239OKOTOKS9

1.0225.4

9.4

5.1

0.98

983

9.5

5.4

1.03

64

9.4

4.7

9.4

4.7

3547ENMX54S9

1.0325.8

17.2

6.9

0.95

853

30.0

0

17.1

5.6

524265ST1

1.0471.8

10.0

3.4

0.9625

236HIGH RI8

1.0270.1

10.0

3.2

0.97

5

241BLACK D8

0.9767.2

10.0

3.2

9.6

3.4

4243HARTELL9

1.054.3

0.9

0.7

0.95

652

30.0

0

0.9

0.6

4252CARSLAND

1.0013.8

23.7

13.8

-30.

00

1.05

26

7.8

3.5

15.7

7.2

3251CARSELA2

1.0013.8

4251CARSELA1

1.0314.2

0.6

0.3

30.0

0

1

14.6

13.3

30.0

01

0.6

0.3

0.6

0.3

15.2

13.6H

3247CAVAL_A

1.0113.9 4247

CAVAL_B

1.0113.9

0.93

176

-30.

00

0.93

176

-30.

00

1

Page 48: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Okotoks 678S and

2017 SP

P1670 PRE-CONNECTION - DIAGRAM A-8N-1: 876L BLACKIE 253S TO GLEICHEN 179STHU, MAY 26 2016 12:40

Okotoks 678S Substation

High River 65S Upgrades

434L

646L

753L

727L

727L

850L

691L

876L

733L

Bus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate A1.105OV 0.899UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

617FOOTHLL1

1.05252.1

643SC1D

1.05252.2

653SC1B

1.05252.2

544ENMX65S4

1.05252.2

34.

3

6.3

34.4

8.6

34.

3

6.3

34.4

8.6

12.4

6.1

12.

4

7.412.4

6.1

12.

4

7.4

640FOOTHLL2

1.03142.5

46.7

13.7

1.0125 46.7

13.7

1.0125

239OKOTOKS7

1.02140.6

242HIGH RI7

1.02140.6

33.7

10.3

33.9

8.9

59.

1

16.

7

59.6

17.0

253BLACKIE7

1.02140.3

886MAG TAP7

1.02140.6

960HART TAP

1.01139.9

7.6

2.3

7.5

0.5

0.6

0.6

0.6

0.2

10.6

1.8

10.6

3.6

0.6

0.5

0.6

0.0

238BLACK D7

1.01139.7

243HARTELL7

1.01139.9

9.6

3.4

9.7

2.9

0.9

0.7

0.9

0.7

254GLEICHE7

1.04143.5

252CARSELA7

1.01139.7

7.5

2.8

7.5

14.2

0.3

14.1

3.0

5251WYNDHAM

1.01139.8

13.9

12.2

13.9

12.1

340NAMAKA 7

1.05144.2

12.8

4.5

12.8

2.9

247CAVALIER

1.05144.8

259STRATHM7

1.04143.4

315HUSSAR

1.03142.7

24.9

40.9

24.9

41.6

18.1

4.6

18.2

1.9

5247CAV T101

1.05145.1

24.9

40.9

1

27.6

27.9

27.3

27.3

0.5

240MAGCAN 7

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.2

1.02140.6

547ENMX54S7

1.02140.5

570ENMX65S7

1.02141.0

97.3

0.6

97.6

1.6

153.3

12.2

1.02

5

151.8

12.1

1.02

5

589ENMX26S7

1.02140.7

590ENMX24S7

1.02140.8

93.4

4.7

93.1

5.7

113.8

13.2

113.6

12.4

949 1.02140.8

48.

5

47.0

49.9

45.

8

207JANET 7

91.8

19.

7

90.

6

21.5

128.

2

31.2

127.9

30.2

1.03141.6

SW

0.0

0.0

0.0

SW

9.8

SW

0.0

26.

3

SW

4242HIGH RI9

1.0426.0

2242HIGH RA9

1.0426.0

15.8

7.2

0.956115

.8

7.2

0.9561

13.2 5.1

2.5

1.0

2.5

1.0

13.2

5.1

4241BLACK D1

1.0325.7

9.6

3.4

0.94

007

9.6

2.8

4238BLACK D9

1.0325.8

9.6

3.4

1.03

64

9.6

2.8

3252CARSELA9

1.0225.6

11.9

4.4

1.03

25

7.9

2.4

3.9

1.2

3239OKOTOKS8

1.0125.2

4239OKOTOKS9

1.0325.7

9.4

5.1

0.98

983

9.5

5.4

1.03

64

9.4

4.7

9.4

4.7

3547ENMX54S9

1.0425.9

17.2

6.9

0.95

853

30.0

0

17.1

5.6

524265ST1

1.0572.4

10.0

3.4

0.9625

236HIGH RI8

1.0270.7

10.0

3.2

0.97

5

241BLACK D8

0.9867.8

10.0

3.2

9.6

3.4

4243HARTELL9

1.054.4

0.9

0.7

0.95

652

30.0

0

0.9

0.6

4252CARSLAND

1.0114.0

23.7

13.7

-30.

00

1.05

26

7.8

3.5

15.7

7.2

3251CARSELA2

1.0114.0

4251CARSELA1

1.0414.3

0.6

0.3

30.0

0

1

14.6

13.3

30.0

01

0.6

0.3

0.6

0.3

15.2

13.6H

3247CAVAL_A

1.0113.9 4247

CAVAL_B

1.0113.9

12.9

21.4

0.93

176

-30.

00

12.1

21.3

0.93

176

-30.

00

1.3

0.7

14.1

22.1R

2.0

1.0

14.1

22.3R

0.0

0.0R

1

Page 49: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Okotoks 678S and

2017 SP

P1670 PRE-CONNECTION - DIAGRAM A-9N-1: 733L NAMAKA 428S TO GLEICHEN 179STHU, MAY 26 2016 12:40

Okotoks 678S Substation

High River 65S Upgrades

434L

646L

753L

727L

727L

850L

691L

876L

733L

Bus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate A1.105OV 0.899UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

617FOOTHLL1

1.05251.9

643SC1D

1.05252.1

653SC1B

1.05252.1

544ENMX65S4

1.05252.1

35.

3

6.7

35.3

8.2

35.

3

6.7

35.3

8.2

18.1

4.9

18.

1

8.518.1

4.9

18.

1

8.5

640FOOTHLL2

1.03142.4

53.3

15.2

1.0125 53.3

15.2

1.0125

239OKOTOKS7

1.02140.3

242HIGH RI7

1.02140.3

38.3

11.0

38.6

9.9

67.

5

17.

8

68.0

18.6

253BLACKIE7

1.01139.3

886MAG TAP7

1.02140.3

960HART TAP

1.01139.5

16.1

1.4

16.0

1.2

0.8

0.4

0.8

0.0

10.6

1.9

10.6

3.6

0.8

0.6

0.8

0.2

238BLACK D7

1.01139.3

243HARTELL7

1.01139.5

9.6

3.4

9.7

2.9

0.9

0.7

0.9

0.7

254GLEICHE7

1.00137.7

252CARSELA7

1.01139.0

12.9 12.8

4.5

3.1

2.2

3.1

18.7

1.1

18.5

3.7

5251WYNDHAM

1.01139.1

13.9

12.2

13.9

12.1

340NAMAKA 7

1.05145.0

247CAVALIER

1.05145.5

259STRATHM7

1.04143.9

315HUSSAR

1.04143.5

24.9

35.0

24.9

35.7

18.1

4.4

18.2

1.7

5247CAV T101

1.06145.7

24.9

35.0

1

14.6

25.4

14.4

24.5

0.2

240MAGCAN 7

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.2

1.02140.3

547ENMX54S7

1.02140.5

570ENMX65S7

1.02141.0

97.0

0.6

97.3

1.5

151.6

12.0

1.02

5

150.1

11.9

1.02

5

589ENMX26S7

1.02140.6

590ENMX24S7

1.02140.8

91.0

4.7

90.8

5.7

113.2

13.2

113.0

12.3

1.3

949 1.02141.0

35.

5

44.7

36.5

44.

4

207JANET 7

78.1

19.

1

77.

3

20.1

132.

6

31.0

132.2

29.9

1.03141.6

SW

0.0

0.0

0.0

SW

9.9

SW

0.0

26.

5

SW

4242HIGH RI9

1.0425.9

2242HIGH RA9

1.0425.9

15.8

7.2

0.956115

.8

7.2

0.9561

13.2 5.1

2.5

1.0

2.5

1.0

13.2

5.1

4241BLACK D1

1.0225.6

9.6

3.4

0.94

007

9.6

2.8

4238BLACK D9

1.0325.7

9.6

3.4

1.03

64

9.6

2.8

3252CARSELA9

1.0225.4

11.9

4.4

1.03

25

7.9

2.4

3.9

1.2

3239OKOTOKS8

1.0125.2

4239OKOTOKS9

1.0225.6

9.4

5.1

0.98

983

9.5

5.4

1.03

64

9.4

4.7

9.4

4.7

3547ENMX54S9

1.0425.9

17.2

6.9

0.95

853

30.0

0

17.1

5.6

524265ST1

1.0572.2

10.0

3.4

0.9625

236HIGH RI8

1.0270.5

10.0

3.2

0.97

5

241BLACK D8

0.9867.6

10.0

3.2

9.6

3.4

4243HARTELL9

1.054.4

0.9

0.7

0.95

652

30.0

0

0.9

0.6

4252CARSLAND

1.0113.9

23.7

13.7

-30.

00

1.05

26

7.8

3.5

15.7

7.2

3251CARSELA2

1.0113.9

4251CARSELA1

1.0314.3

0.6

0.3

30.0

0

1

14.6

13.3

30.0

01

0.6

0.3

0.6

0.3

15.2

13.6H

3247CAVAL_A

1.0113.9 4247

CAVAL_B

1.0113.9

12.9

18.3

0.93

176

-30.

00

12.1

18.2

0.93

176

-30.

00

1.3

0.7

14.1

19.0R

2.0

1.0

14.1

19.2R

0.0

0.0R

1

Page 50: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Okotoks 678S and

2017 WP

P1670 PRE-CONNECTION - DIAGRAM A-10N-0: NORMAL OPERATIONTHU, MAY 26 2016 12:45

Okotoks 678S Substation

High River 65S Upgrades

434L

646L

753L

727L

727L

850L

691L

876L

733L

Bus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate B1.105OV 0.899UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

617FOOTHLL1

1.06254.8

643SC1D

1.07255.6

653SC1B

1.07255.6

544ENMX65S4

1.06253.5

38.

4

14.

8

38.5

0.4

38.

4

14.

8

38.5

0.4

17.0

29.6

17.

0

16.117.0

29.6

17.

0

16.1

640FOOTHLL2

1.02141.3

55.4

1.4

1.0375 55.4

1.4

1.0375

239OKOTOKS7

1.02140.5

242HIGH RI7

1.02140.3

39.1

2.4

39.4

3.6

70.

8

2.0

71.4

1.2

253BLACKIE7

1.02141.0

886MAG TAP7

1.02140.7

960HART TAP

1.01139.3

15.4

13.

8

15.3

11.4

4.1

17.

0

4.1

16.6

14.2

2.7

14.1

4.3

4.2

9.5

4.2

9.0

238BLACK D7

1.01139.0

243HARTELL7

1.01139.3

13.2

4.1

13.2

3.7

0.9

0.7

0.9

0.7

254GLEICHE7

1.04142.9

252CARSELA7

1.01140.0

16.2 15.9

16.0

1.0

9.9

1.0

16.1

3.5

16.0

0.8

5251WYNDHAM

1.01140.1

20.9

5.9

20.9

5.8

340NAMAKA 7

1.05144.2

2.1

19.1

2.1

17.6

247CAVALIER

1.05144.7

259STRATHM7

1.04143.1

315HUSSAR

1.04143.5

30.2

40.7

30.1

41.3

9.6

2.2

9.7

0.8

SW 26.

2

SW

0.0

5247CAV T101

1.05145.0

30.2

40.7

1

0.6

19.7

0.6

18.5

7.5

240MAGCAN 7

0.0

25.5

0.0

25.7

SW

25.5

1.02140.9

547ENMX54S7

1.01139.8

570ENMX65S7

1.02140.1

99.9

6.4

100.2

5.3

153.2

11.1

1.03

75

151.7

10.9

1.03

75

589ENMX26S7

1.01139.8

590ENMX24S7

1.01139.7

87.4

3.9

87.2

3.0

117.1

9.0

116.9

8.1

18.9

SW

0.0

949 1.01139.9

24.

1

42.2

24.9

42.

5

207JANET 7

66.3

17.

7

65.

7

18.3

140.

0

18.1

139.6

16.8

SW 151

.7

1.02140.3

4242HIGH RI9

1.0526.3

2242HIGH RA9

1.0526.2

15.8

10.9

0.9324915

.8

10.9

0.93249

13.2 8.0

2.5

1.5

2.5

1.5

13.2

8.0

4241BLACK D1

1.0125.3

13.2

4.1

0.98

279

9913.1

3.1

4238BLACK D9

1.0426.0

13.2

4.1

1.05

58

9913.1

3.1

3252CARSELA9

1.0425.9

12.5

1.7

1.03

25

318.3

0.6

994.1

0.3

3239OKOTOKS8

1.0225.6

4239OKOTOKS9

1.0426.1

9.4

5.1

0.97

73

9.5

5.4

1.05

58

9.4

4.7

999.4

4.7

3547ENMX54S9

1.0325.8

19.5

1.9

0.97

73

30.0

0

9919.5

0.4

G1 G2 G3 G4 G5

524265ST1

1.0773.7

13.7

4.5

0.94

236HIGH RI8

1.0773.9

13.7

4.1

1

241BLACK D8

1.0270.2

13.7

4.1

13.2

4.1

4243HARTELL9

1.054.4

0.9

0.7

0.95

65

30.0

0

990.9

0.6

4252CARSLAND

1.0013.8

23.4

13.3

-30.

00

1.03

32

317.7

3.4

9915.6

7.0

3251CARSELA2

1.0114.0

4251CARSELA1

1.0314.2

0.6

0.3

30.0

0

1

21.6

7.2

30.0

01

370.6

0.3

2

370.6

0.3

122.2

7.5R

3247CAVAL_A

1.0113.9 4247

CAVAL_B

1.0113.9

15.4

21.5

0.93

18

-30.

00

14.8

21.3

0.93

18

-30.

00

371.4

0.7

116.9

22.2R

372.0

1.02

16.9

22.3R

30.0

0.0R

1

Page 51: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Okotoks 678S and

2017 WP

P1670 PRE-CONNECTION - DIAGRAM A-11N-1: 691L JANET 74S TO CHESTERMERE 419STHU, MAY 26 2016 12:45

Okotoks 678S Substation

High River 65S Upgrades

434L

646L

753L

727L

727L

850L

691L

876L

733L

Bus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate B1.105OV 0.899UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

617FOOTHLL1

1.06254.3

643SC1D

1.06255.1

653SC1B

1.06255.1

544ENMX65S4

1.06253.2

44.

6

13.

5

44.6

1.5

44.

6

13.

5

44.6

1.5

49.9

30.1

49.

8

17.249.9

30.1

49.

8

17.2

640FOOTHLL2

1.02141.1

94.4

3.7

1.0375 94.4

3.7

1.0375

239OKOTOKS7

1.01140.0

242HIGH RI7

1.01139.8

66.7

7.6

67.6

6.6

119

.5

11.3

121.

1

6.5

253BLACKIE7

1.01139.2

886MAG TAP7

1.02140.2

960HART TAP

1.01138.8

65.0

23.

8

62.9

25.8

5.0

16.

5

5.0

16.1

14.2

2.7

14.1

4.4

5.1

9.8

5.0

9.4

238BLACK D7

1.00138.6

243HARTELL7

1.01138.8

13.2

4.1

13.2

3.7

0.9

0.7

0.9

0.7

254GLEICHE7

1.01139.7

252CARSELA7

1.01139.0

89.6 84.3

45.8

27.1

13.1

26.7

42.7

8.3

42.1

7.3

5251WYNDHAM

1.01139.1

20.9

9.2

20.9

9.1

340NAMAKA 7

1.02141.2

70.5

48.8

68.6

51.4

247CAVALIER

1.03141.9

259STRATHM7

1.01139.2

315HUSSAR

1.02140.5

30.1

60.5

30.1

60.9

9.6

2.2

9.7

0.6

SW 24.

8

SW

0.0

5247CAV T101

1.03142.4

30.1

60.5

1

65.1

3.4

65.9

4.0

11.5

240MAGCAN 7

0.0

25.3

0.0

25.5

SW

25.3

1.02140.4

547ENMX54S7

1.01139.6

570ENMX65S7

1.01139.9

97.8

6.1

98.1

5.1

144.6

11.9

1.03

75

143.2

11.8

1.03

75

589ENMX26S7

1.01139.6

590ENMX24S7

1.01139.4

75.7

6.4

75.5

5.9

113.8

9.6

113.6

8.7

37.3

SW

0.0

949 0.98134.7

41.5

24.4

40.

8

24.

6

207JANET 7

160.

8

12.6

160.2

10.7

SW 151

.1

1.01140.1

4242HIGH RI9

1.0526.2

2242HIGH RA9

1.0526.1

15.8

10.9

0.9324915

.8

10.9

0.93249

13.2 8.0

2.5

1.5

2.5

1.5

13.2

8.0

4241BLACK D1

1.0125.2

13.2

4.1

0.98

279

9913.1

3.1

4238BLACK D9

1.0425.9

13.2

4.1

1.05

58

9913.1

3.1

3252CARSELA9

1.0325.7

12.5

1.7

1.03

25

318.3

0.6

994.1

0.3

3239OKOTOKS8

1.0225.5

4239OKOTOKS9

1.0426.0

9.4

5.1

0.97

73

9.5

5.4

1.05

58

9.4

4.7

999.4

4.7

3547ENMX54S9

1.0325.7

19.5

1.9

0.97

73

30.0

0

9919.5

0.4

G1 G2 G3 G4 G5

524265ST1

1.0773.5

13.7

4.5

0.94

236HIGH RI8

1.0773.6

13.7

4.1

1

241BLACK D8

1.0169.9

13.7

4.1

13.2

4.1

4243HARTELL9

1.054.4

0.9

0.7

0.95

65

30.0

0

990.9

0.6

4252CARSLAND

0.9913.7

23.5

13.3

-30.

00

1.03

32

317.7

3.4

9915.6

7.0

3251CARSELA2

1.0113.9

4251CARSELA1

1.0314.2

0.6

0.3

30.0

0

1

21.6

10.7

30.0

01

370.6

0.3

2

370.6

0.3

122.2

11.0R

3247CAVAL_A

1.0013.9 4247

CAVAL_B

1.0113.9

15.5

30.3

0.93

18

-30.

00

14.8

34.0

0.93

18

-30.

00

371.4

0.7

116.9

31.0H

372.0

1.02

16.9

31.0H

30.0

4.0R

1

Page 52: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Okotoks 678S and

2017 WP

P1670 PRE-CONNECTION - DIAGRAM A-12N-1: 434L HIGH RIVER 65S TO FOOTHILLS 237STHU, MAY 26 2016 12:45

Okotoks 678S Substation

High River 65S Upgrades

434L

646L

753L

727L

727L

850L

691L

876L

733L

Bus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate B1.105OV 0.899UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

617FOOTHLL1

1.06254.7

643SC1D

1.06255.5

653SC1B

1.06255.5

544ENMX65S4

1.06253.5

37.

6

15.

1

37.7

0.2

37.

6

15.

1

37.7

0.2

12.2

28.3

12.

1

14.712.2

28.3

12.

1

14.7

640FOOTHLL2

1.02141.1

49.8

0.3

1.0375 49.8

0.3

1.0375

239OKOTOKS7

1.01138.8

242HIGH RI7

1.00137.4

97.7

5.9

99.6

1.0

253BLACKIE7

1.01139.3

886MAG TAP7

1.00138.4

960HART TAP

0.99136.5

0.6

15.

0

0.5

12.5

60.

1

14.

3

60.4

14.5

14.2

2.8

14.1

4.4

60.7

10.2

60.4

10.3

238BLACK D7

0.99136.2

243HARTELL7

0.99136.5

13.2

4.2

13.2

3.7

0.9

0.7

0.9

0.7

254GLEICHE7

1.03142.0

252CARSELA7

1.00138.6

3.4 3.2

15.0

2.9

8.1

2.9

18.1

6.2

17.9

3.7

5251WYNDHAM

1.01138.7

20.9

10.6

20.9

10.6

340NAMAKA 7

1.04143.8

10.5

18.1

10.6

16.6

247CAVALIER

1.05144.3

259STRATHM7

1.03142.8

315HUSSAR

1.04143.1

30.2

44.1

30.1

44.7

9.6

2.2

9.7

0.7

SW 26.

1

SW

0.0

5247CAV T101

1.05144.7

30.2

44.1

1

13.4

23.7

13.3

22.8

5.7

240MAGCAN 7

0.0

24.7

0.0

24.8

SW

24.7

1.00138.7

547ENMX54S7

1.01139.8

570ENMX65S7

1.02140.1

100.2

6.5

100.5

5.4

154.8

10.9

1.03

75

153.3

10.7

1.03

75

589ENMX26S7

1.01139.8

590ENMX24S7

1.01139.7

89.6

3.4

89.4

2.5

117.6

8.9

117.5

7.9

18.2

SW

0.0

949 1.01139.8

36.

9

46.2

38.0

45.

7

207JANET 7

79.7

20.

2

78.

8

21.4

135.

9

19.0

135.5

17.8

SW 151

.7

1.02140.3

4242HIGH RI9

1.0325.7

2242HIGH RA9

1.0325.7

15.8

10.9

0.9324915

.8

10.9

0.93249

13.2 8.0

2.5

1.5

2.5

1.5

13.2

8.0

4241BLACK D1

0.9924.7

13.2

4.1

0.98

279

9913.1

3.1

4238BLACK D9

1.0225.5

13.2

4.2

1.05

58

9913.1

3.1

3252CARSELA9

1.0325.7

12.5

1.7

1.03

25

318.3

0.6

994.1

0.3

3239OKOTOKS8

1.0125.2

4239OKOTOKS9

1.0325.8

9.4

5.1

0.97

73

9.5

5.4

1.05

58

9.4

4.7

999.4

4.7

3547ENMX54S9

1.0325.8

19.5

1.9

0.97

73

30.0

0

9919.5

0.4

G1 G2 G3 G4 G5

524265ST1

1.0572.2

13.8

4.6

0.94

236HIGH RI8

1.0572.4

13.8

4.2

1

241BLACK D8

0.9968.6

13.8

4.2

13.2

4.1

4243HARTELL9

1.034.3

0.9

0.7

0.95

65

30.0

0

990.9

0.6

4252CARSLAND

0.9913.6

23.5

13.3

-30.

00

1.03

32

317.7

3.4

9915.6

7.0

3251CARSELA2

1.0013.9

4251CARSELA1

1.0314.2

0.6

0.3

30.0

0

1

21.6

12.2

30.0

01

370.6

0.3

2

370.6

0.3

122.2

12.5R

3247CAVAL_A

1.0113.9 4247

CAVAL_B

1.0113.9

15.5

23.3

0.93

18

-30.

00

14.8

23.1

0.93

18

-30.

00

371.4

0.7

116.9

24.0R

372.0

1.02

16.9

24.1R

30.0

0.0R

1

Page 53: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Okotoks 678S and

2017 WP

P1670 PRE-CONNECTION - DIAGRAM A-13N-1: 646L OKOTOKS 678S TO FOOTHILLS 237STHU, MAY 26 2016 12:45

Okotoks 678S Substation

High River 65S Upgrades

434L

646L

753L

727L

727L

850L

691L

876L

733L

Bus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate B1.105OV 0.899UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

617FOOTHLL1

1.06254.7

643SC1D

1.06255.5

653SC1B

1.06255.5

544ENMX65S4

1.06253.5

38.

2

15.

0

38.2

0.3

38.

2

15.

0

38.2

0.3

15.4

28.6

15.

4

15.115.4

28.6

15.

4

15.1

640FOOTHLL2

1.02141.1

53.5

0.1

1.0375 53.5

0.1

1.0375

239OKOTOKS7

1.01139.4

242HIGH RI7

1.01139.7

105

.8 5.5

107.

0

2.1

253BLACKIE7

1.02140.5

886MAG TAP7

1.01139.9

960HART TAP

1.01138.8

16.4

14.

4

16.2

12.1

29.9

20.

1

29.8

19.9

14.2

2.7

14.1

4.4

29.7

5.8

29.8

5.5

238BLACK D7

1.00138.5

243HARTELL7

1.01138.8

13.2

4.1

13.2

3.7

0.9

0.7

0.9

0.7

254GLEICHE7

1.03142.6

252CARSELA7

1.01139.4

11.9 11.7

15.5

4.3

8.8

4.3

10.8

4.7

10.8

1.9

5251WYNDHAM

1.01139.4

20.9

8.1

20.9

8.0

340NAMAKA 7

1.04144.1

2.1

18.5

2.2

17.0

247CAVALIER

1.05144.6

259STRATHM7

1.04143.0

315HUSSAR

1.04143.4

30.2

41.7

30.1

42.3

9.6

2.2

9.7

0.8

SW 26.

1

SW

0.0

5247CAV T101

1.05144.9

30.2

41.7

1

4.9

21.1

4.8

20.1

6.5

240MAGCAN 7

0.0

25.2

0.0

25.4

SW

25.2

1.02140.1

547ENMX54S7

1.01139.8

570ENMX65S7

1.02140.1

100.0

6.5

100.3

5.4

153.7

10.9

1.03

75

152.3

10.8

1.03

75

589ENMX26S7

1.01139.8

590ENMX24S7

1.01139.7

88.1

3.6

87.9

2.8

117.3

8.9

117.1

8.0

18.5

SW

0.0

949 1.01139.8

28.

4

43.7

29.3

43.

7

207JANET 7

70.7

18.

7

70.

0

19.5

138.

7

18.5

138.3

17.2

SW 151

.7

1.02140.3

4242HIGH RI9

1.0526.2

2242HIGH RA9

1.0526.1

15.8

10.9

0.9324915

.8

10.9

0.93249

13.2 8.0

2.5

1.5

2.5

1.5

13.2

8.0

4241BLACK D1

1.0125.2

13.2

4.1

0.98

279

9913.1

3.1

4238BLACK D9

1.0425.9

13.2

4.1

1.05

58

9913.1

3.1

3252CARSELA9

1.0325.8

12.5

1.7

1.03

25

318.3

0.6

994.1

0.3

3239OKOTOKS8

1.0125.4

4239OKOTOKS9

1.0425.9

9.4

5.1

0.97

73

9.5

5.4

1.05

58

9.4

4.7

999.4

4.7

3547ENMX54S9

1.0325.8

19.5

1.9

0.97

73

30.0

0

9919.5

0.4

G1 G2 G3 G4 G5

524265ST1

1.0673.5

13.7

4.5

0.94

236HIGH RI8

1.0773.6

13.7

4.1

1

241BLACK D8

1.0169.9

13.7

4.1

13.2

4.1

4243HARTELL9

1.054.3

0.9

0.7

0.95

65

30.0

0

990.9

0.6

4252CARSLAND

0.9913.7

23.5

13.3

-30.

00

1.03

32

317.7

3.4

9915.6

7.0

3251CARSELA2

1.0113.9

4251CARSELA1

1.0314.2

0.6

0.3

30.0

0

1

21.6

9.5

30.0

01

370.6

0.3

2

370.6

0.3

122.2

9.8R

3247CAVAL_A

1.0113.9 4247

CAVAL_B

1.0113.9

15.5

22.0

0.93

18

-30.

00

14.8

21.9

0.93

18

-30.

00

371.4

0.7

116.9

22.7R

372.0

1.02

16.9

22.9R

30.0

0.0R

1

Page 54: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Okotoks 678S and

2017 WP

P1670 PRE-CONNECTION - DIAGRAM A-14N-1: 753L HIGH RIVER 65S TO BLACKIE 253STHU, MAY 26 2016 12:45

Okotoks 678S Substation

High River 65S Upgrades

434L

646L

753L

727L

727L

850L

691L

876L

733L

Bus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate B1.105OV 0.899UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

617FOOTHLL1

1.06254.5

643SC1D

1.06255.4

653SC1B

1.06255.4

544ENMX65S4

1.06253.4

38.

0

15.

3

38.0

0.1

38.

0

15.

3

38.0

0.1

14.7

26.7

14.

7

13.114.7

26.7

14.

7

13.1

640FOOTHLL2

1.02140.9

52.7

2.2

1.0375 52.7

2.2

1.0375

239OKOTOKS7

1.01140.1

242HIGH RI7

1.01139.7

40.2

1.5

40.5

2.6

64.

4

4.6

64.9

5.1

253BLACKIE7

1.03141.6

886MAG TAP7

1.02140.1

960HART TAP

1.01138.7

4.9

24.

4

4.8

24.0

14.2

2.7

14.1

4.4

4.8

1.9

4.8

1.4

238BLACK D7

1.00138.4

243HARTELL7

1.01138.7

13.2

4.1

13.2

3.7

0.9

0.7

0.9

0.7

254GLEICHE7

1.04143.1

252CARSELA7

1.02140.1

10.7 10.5

11.9

10.8

17.3

10.7

26.1

10.1

25.8

8.0

5251WYNDHAM

1.02140.1

20.9

5.6

20.9

5.6

340NAMAKA 7

1.05144.3

3.3

14.9

3.3

13.4

247CAVALIER

1.05144.8

259STRATHM7

1.04143.2

315HUSSAR

1.04143.6

30.2

39.9

30.1

40.5

9.6

2.2

9.7

0.8

SW 26.

2

SW

0.0

5247CAV T101

1.05145.1

30.2

39.9

1

6.0

22.9

5.9

21.9

15.2

240MAGCAN 7

0.0

25.3

0.0

25.5

SW

25.3

1.02140.4

547ENMX54S7

1.01139.8

570ENMX65S7

1.01140.1

100.0

6.6

100.3

5.5

153.9

10.6

1.03

75

152.4

10.5

1.03

75

589ENMX26S7

1.01139.8

590ENMX24S7

1.01139.6

88.3

3.2

88.1

2.4

117.3

8.8

117.1

7.9

15.2

SW

0.0

949 1.01139.9

29.

5

45.5

30.5

45.

4

207JANET 7

72.0

20.

3

71.

2

21.2

138.

3

19.1

137.9

17.8

SW 151

.7

1.02140.3

4242HIGH RI9

1.0526.2

2242HIGH RA9

1.0426.1

15.8

10.9

0.9324915

.8

10.9

0.93249

13.2 8.0

2.5

1.5

2.5

1.5

13.2

8.0

4241BLACK D1

1.0125.2

13.2

4.1

0.98

279

9913.1

3.1

4238BLACK D9

1.0425.9

13.2

4.1

1.05

58

9913.1

3.1

3252CARSELA9

1.0425.9

12.5

1.7

1.03

25

318.3

0.6

994.1

0.3

3239OKOTOKS8

1.0225.5

4239OKOTOKS9

1.0426.0

9.4

5.1

0.97

73

9.5

5.4

1.05

58

9.4

4.7

999.4

4.7

3547ENMX54S9

1.0325.8

19.5

1.9

0.97

73

30.0

0

9919.5

0.4

G1 G2 G3 G4 G5

524265ST1

1.0673.4

13.7

4.5

0.94

236HIGH RI8

1.0773.6

13.7

4.1

1

241BLACK D8

1.0169.9

13.7

4.1

13.2

4.1

4243HARTELL9

1.044.3

0.9

0.7

0.95

65

30.0

0

990.9

0.6

4252CARSLAND

1.0013.8

23.4

13.3

-30.

00

1.03

32

317.7

3.4

9915.6

7.0

3251CARSELA2

1.0114.0

4251CARSELA1

1.0314.2

0.6

0.3

30.0

0

1

21.6

7.0

30.0

01

370.6

0.3

2

370.6

0.3

122.2

7.3R

3247CAVAL_A

1.0113.9 4247

CAVAL_B

1.0113.9

15.4

21.0

0.93

18

-30.

00

14.8

20.9

0.93

18

-30.

00

371.4

0.7

116.9

21.7R

372.0

1.02

16.9

21.9R

30.0

0.0R

1

Page 55: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Okotoks 678S and

2017 WP

P1670 PRE-CONNECTION - DIAGRAM A-15N-1: PCES01L NAMAKA 428S TO CAVALIER POWER PLANTTHU, MAY 26 2016 12:46

Okotoks 678S Substation

High River 65S Upgrades

434L

646L

753L

727L

727L

850L

691L

876L

733L

Bus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate B1.105OV 0.899UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

617FOOTHLL1

1.05253.2

643SC1D

1.06254.0

653SC1B

1.06254.0

544ENMX65S4

1.05252.3

40.

1

15.

1

40.1

0.1

40.

1

15.

1

40.1

0.1

20.5

23.2

20.

5

9.8

20.5

23.2

20.

5

9.8

640FOOTHLL2

1.01140.0

60.6

5.2

1.0375 60.6

5.2

1.0375

239OKOTOKS7

1.01138.8

242HIGH RI7

1.00138.4

42.8

1.6

43.2

0.7

77.

3

6.0

77.9

7.4

253BLACKIE7

1.00137.6

886MAG TAP7

1.01138.9

960HART TAP

1.00137.5

22.1

5.2

21.9

3.0

4.4

17.

9

4.4

17.5

14.2

2.7

14.1

4.4

4.4

7.9

4.4

7.5

238BLACK D7

0.99137.2

243HARTELL7

1.00137.5

13.2

4.2

13.2

3.7

0.9

0.7

0.9

0.7

254GLEICHE7

0.98135.8

252CARSELA7

1.00137.7

26.2 25.8

0.2

4.3

2.0

4.3

19.5

1.0

19.3

1.4

5251WYNDHAM

1.00137.8

20.9

11.7

20.9

11.6

340NAMAKA 7

0.98135.5

12.0

3.3

12.0

1.9

247CAVALIER

1.05144.7

259STRATHM7

0.99136.6

315HUSSAR

0.98134.7

9.6

2.2

9.7

0.4

SW 23.

8

SW

0.0

5247CAV T101

1.05145.0

1

20.9

6.8

20.8

7.7

0.4

240MAGCAN 7

0.0

24.9

0.0

25.0

SW

24.9

1.01139.1

547ENMX54S7

1.01139.0

570ENMX65S7

1.01139.3

99.7

6.4

100.0

5.3

154.4

13.3

1.03

75

152.9

13.1

1.03

75

589ENMX26S7

1.01139.0

590ENMX24S7

1.01138.8

89.7

7.2

89.5

6.3

117.3

9.6

117.1

8.6

2.6

SW

0.0

949 0.99137.2

44.

4

13.3

45.2

13.

5

207JANET 7

87.0

12.5

85.

9

10.

9

133.

6

10.5

133.2

9.4

SW 149

.6

1.01139.3

4242HIGH RI9

1.0425.9

2242HIGH RA9

1.0325.9

15.8

10.9

0.9324915

.8

10.9

0.93249

13.2 8.0

2.5

1.5

2.5

1.5

13.2

8.0

4241BLACK D1

1.0024.9

13.2

4.1

0.98

279

9913.1

3.1

4238BLACK D9

1.0325.7

13.2

4.2

1.05

58

9913.1

3.1

3252CARSELA9

1.0225.5

12.5

1.7

1.03

25

318.3

0.6

994.1

0.3

3239OKOTOKS8

1.0125.2

4239OKOTOKS9

1.0325.8

9.4

5.1

0.97

73

9.5

5.4

1.05

58

9.4

4.7

999.4

4.7

3547ENMX54S9

1.0225.6

19.5

1.9

0.97

73

30.0

0

9919.5

0.4

G1 G2 G3 G4 G5

524265ST1

1.0572.8

13.8

4.6

0.94

236HIGH RI8

1.0672.9

13.7

4.2

1

241BLACK D8

1.0069.2

13.7

4.2

13.2

4.1

4243HARTELL9

1.044.3

0.9

0.7

0.95

65

30.0

0

990.9

0.6

4252CARSLAND

0.9813.5

23.5

13.4

-30.

00

1.03

32

317.7

3.4

9915.6

7.0

3251CARSELA2

1.0013.8

4251CARSELA1

1.0314.2

0.6

0.3

30.0

0

1

21.6

13.3

30.0

01

370.6

0.3

2

370.6

0.3

122.2

13.6H

3247CAVAL_A

1.0113.9 4247

CAVAL_B

1.0113.9

0.93

18

-30.

00

0.93

18

-30.

00

37

1

37 2

3

1

Page 56: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Okotoks 678S and

2017 WP

P1670 PRE-CONNECTION - DIAGRAM A-16N-1: CAVALIER TRANSFORMERTHU, MAY 26 2016 12:46

Okotoks 678S Substation

High River 65S Upgrades

434L

646L

753L

727L

727L

850L

691L

876L

733L

Bus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate B1.105OV 0.899UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

617FOOTHLL1

1.05253.2

643SC1D

1.06254.0

653SC1B

1.06254.0

544ENMX65S4

1.05252.3

40.

1

15.

0

40.1

0.1

40.

1

15.

0

40.1

0.1

20.5

23.3

20.

5

9.9

20.5

23.3

20.

5

9.9

640FOOTHLL2

1.01140.1

60.6

5.1

1.0375 60.6

5.1

1.0375

239OKOTOKS7

1.01138.8

242HIGH RI7

1.00138.5

42.8

1.5

43.2

0.6

77.

3

5.9

77.9

7.2

253BLACKIE7

1.00137.7

886MAG TAP7

1.01138.9

960HART TAP

1.00137.5

22.1

5.4

21.9

3.2

4.4

17.

9

4.4

17.5

14.2

2.7

14.1

4.4

4.4

7.9

4.4

7.5

238BLACK D7

0.99137.2

243HARTELL7

1.00137.5

13.2

4.1

13.2

3.7

0.9

0.7

0.9

0.7

254GLEICHE7

0.98135.9

252CARSELA7

1.00137.8

26.2 25.8

0.4

4.3

2.0

4.3

19.5

1.1

19.4

1.4

5251WYNDHAM

1.00137.9

20.9

11.7

20.9

11.6

340NAMAKA 7

0.98135.6

12.0

3.6

12.0

2.2

247CAVALIER

0.98135.6

259STRATHM7

0.99136.7

315HUSSAR

0.98134.9

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.7

9.6

2.2

9.7

0.4

SW 23.

9

SW

0.0

5247CAV T101

1.05145.0

1

20.9

6.3

20.8

7.2

0.3

240MAGCAN 7

0.0

24.9

0.0

25.0

SW

24.9

1.01139.2

547ENMX54S7

1.01139.0

570ENMX65S7

1.01139.3

99.7

6.4

100.0

5.3

154.4

13.2

1.03

75

152.9

13.1

1.03

75

589ENMX26S7

1.01139.0

590ENMX24S7

1.01138.8

89.7

7.2

89.5

6.3

117.3

9.6

117.1

8.6

2.9

SW

0.0

949 0.99137.2

44.

4

13.8

45.2

14.

1

207JANET 7

86.9

11.9

85.

9

10.

4

133.

6

10.7

133.3

9.5

SW 149

.6

1.01139.3

4242HIGH RI9

1.0425.9

2242HIGH RA9

1.0425.9

15.8

10.9

0.9324915

.8

10.9

0.93249

13.2 8.0

2.5

1.5

2.5

1.5

13.2

8.0

4241BLACK D1

1.0024.9

13.2

4.1

0.98

279

9913.1

3.1

4238BLACK D9

1.0325.7

13.2

4.1

1.05

58

9913.1

3.1

3252CARSELA9

1.0225.5

12.5

1.7

1.03

25

318.3

0.6

994.1

0.3

3239OKOTOKS8

1.0125.2

4239OKOTOKS9

1.0325.8

9.4

5.1

0.97

73

9.5

5.4

1.05

58

9.4

4.7

999.4

4.7

3547ENMX54S9

1.0225.6

19.5

1.9

0.97

73

30.0

0

9919.5

0.4

G1 G2 G3 G4 G5

524265ST1

1.0572.8

13.8

4.6

0.94

236HIGH RI8

1.0672.9

13.7

4.2

1

241BLACK D8

1.0069.2

13.7

4.2

13.2

4.1

4243HARTELL9

1.044.3

0.9

0.7

0.95

65

30.0

0

990.9

0.6

4252CARSLAND

0.9813.5

23.5

13.4

-30.

00

1.03

32

317.7

3.4

9915.6

7.0

3251CARSELA2

1.0013.8

4251CARSELA1

1.0314.2

0.6

0.3

30.0

0

1

21.6

13.3

30.0

01

370.6

0.3

2

370.6

0.3

122.2

13.6H

3247CAVAL_A

1.0113.9 4247

CAVAL_B

1.0113.9

0.93

18

-30.

00

0.93

18

-30.

00

37

1

37 2

3

1

Page 57: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Okotoks 678S and

2017 WP

P1670 PRE-CONNECTION - DIAGRAM A-17N-1: 876L BLACKIE 253S TO GLEICHEN 179STHU, MAY 26 2016 12:46

Okotoks 678S Substation

High River 65S Upgrades

434L

646L

753L

727L

727L

850L

691L

876L

733L

Bus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate B1.105OV 0.899UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

617FOOTHLL1

1.06254.3

643SC1D

1.06255.2

653SC1B

1.06255.2

544ENMX65S4

1.06253.3

37.

2

15.

8

37.2

0.6

37.

2

15.

8

37.2

0.6

9.9

23.9

9.9

10.39.9

23.9

9.9

10.3

640FOOTHLL2

1.02140.7

47.1

5.5

1.0375 47.1

5.5

1.0375

239OKOTOKS7

1.01139.6

242HIGH RI7

1.01139.3

33.2

2.7

33.4

1.3

60.

3

7.9

60.7

8.2

253BLACKIE7

1.01139.2

886MAG TAP7

1.01139.7

960HART TAP

1.00138.3

4.9

3.0

4.8

0.3

4.1

18.

1

4.1

17.7

14.2

2.7

14.1

4.4

4.1

8.0

4.1

7.6

238BLACK D7

1.00138.0

243HARTELL7

1.00138.3

13.2

4.1

13.2

3.7

0.9

0.7

0.9

0.7

254GLEICHE7

1.04144.2

252CARSELA7

1.01138.8

4.8

2.1

4.8

10.2

0.2

10.2

3.0

5251WYNDHAM

1.01138.9

20.9

9.9

20.9

9.9

340NAMAKA 7

1.05144.9

13.8

3.0

13.8

1.4

247CAVALIER

1.05145.3

259STRATHM7

1.04143.5

315HUSSAR

1.04144.2

30.2

35.7

30.2

36.4

9.6

2.2

9.7

0.8

SW 26.

3

SW

0.0

5247CAV T101

1.06145.6

30.2

35.7

1

16.7

30.6

16.4

29.8

0.3

240MAGCAN 7

0.0

25.2

0.0

25.3

SW

25.2

1.01140.0

547ENMX54S7

1.01139.8

570ENMX65S7

1.01140.1

100.3

6.8

100.6

5.7

155.2

10.0

1.03

75

153.7

9.9

1.03

75

589ENMX26S7

1.01139.8

590ENMX24S7

1.01139.7

90.2

2.2

90.0

1.2

117.8

8.5

117.6

7.6

SW

0.0

949 1.01140.0

40.

2

53.3

41.5

52.

2

207JANET 7

83.3

26.

5

82.

3

27.9

134.

9

21.1

134.5

19.9

SW 151

.8

1.02140.3

4242HIGH RI9

1.0426.1

2242HIGH RA9

1.0426.0

15.8

10.9

0.9324915

.8

10.9

0.93249

13.2 8.0

2.5

1.5

2.5

1.5

13.2

8.0

4241BLACK D1

1.0025.1

13.2

4.1

0.98

279

9913.1

3.1

4238BLACK D9

1.0325.8

13.2

4.1

1.05

58

9913.1

3.1

3252CARSELA9

1.0325.7

12.5

1.7

1.03

25

318.3

0.6

994.1

0.3

3239OKOTOKS8

1.0225.4

4239OKOTOKS9

1.0425.9

9.4

5.1

0.97

73

9.5

5.4

1.05

58

9.4

4.7

999.4

4.7

3547ENMX54S9

1.0325.8

19.5

1.9

0.97

73

30.0

0

9919.5

0.4

G1 G2 G3 G4 G5

524265ST1

1.0673.2

13.8

4.6

0.94

236HIGH RI8

1.0673.3

13.7

4.1

1

241BLACK D8

1.0169.6

13.7

4.1

13.2

4.1

4243HARTELL9

1.044.3

0.9

0.7

0.95

65

30.0

0

990.9

0.6

4252CARSLAND

0.9913.6

23.5

13.3

-30.

00

1.03

32

317.7

3.4

9915.6

7.0

3251CARSELA2

1.0113.9

4251CARSELA1

1.0314.2

0.6

0.3

30.0

0

1

21.6

11.5

30.0

01

370.6

0.3

2

370.6

0.3

122.2

11.8R

3247CAVAL_A

1.0113.9 4247

CAVAL_B

1.0113.9

15.4

18.8

0.93

18

-30.

00

14.8

18.7

0.93

18

-30.

00

371.4

0.7

116.9

19.5R

372.0

1.02

16.9

19.7R

30.0

0.0R

1

Page 58: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Okotoks 678S and

2017 WP

P1670 PRE-CONNECTION - DIAGRAM A-18N-1: 733L NAMAKA 428S TO GLEICHEN 179STHU, MAY 26 2016 12:46

Okotoks 678S Substation

High River 65S Upgrades

434L

646L

753L

727L

727L

850L

691L

876L

733L

Bus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate B1.105OV 0.899UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

617FOOTHLL1

1.06254.2

643SC1D

1.06255.1

653SC1B

1.06255.1

544ENMX65S4

1.06253.3

38.

2

15.

7

38.3

0.5

38.

2

15.

7

38.3

0.5

16.0

23.5

16.

0

10.016.0

23.5

16.

0

10.0

640FOOTHLL2

1.02140.6

54.2

5.7

1.0375 54.2

5.7

1.0375

239OKOTOKS7

1.01139.4

242HIGH RI7

1.01139.1

38.3

2.4

38.6

1.2

69.

3

7.5

69.8

8.2

253BLACKIE7

1.00138.5

886MAG TAP7

1.01139.5

960HART TAP

1.00138.1

14.0

3.5

13.9

1.0

4.2

18.

1

4.3

17.7

14.2

2.7

14.1

4.4

4.3

7.9

4.3

7.5

238BLACK D7

1.00137.8

243HARTELL7

1.00138.1

13.2

4.1

13.2

3.7

0.9

0.7

0.9

0.7

254GLEICHE7

0.99137.1

252CARSELA7

1.00138.5

13.9 13.8

3.1

0.0

1.5

0.0

15.1

0.2

15.0

2.4

5251WYNDHAM

1.00138.5

20.9

11.1

20.9

11.1

340NAMAKA 7

1.05145.5

247CAVALIER

1.06145.9

259STRATHM7

1.04144.0

315HUSSAR

1.05144.9

30.2

30.6

30.2

31.3

9.6

2.1

9.7

0.8

SW 26.

5

SW

0.0

5247CAV T101

1.06146.2

30.2

30.6

1

2.7

27.2

2.6

26.2

0.9

240MAGCAN 7

0.0

25.1

0.0

25.2

SW

25.1

1.01139.8

547ENMX54S7

1.01139.8

570ENMX65S7

1.01140.0

99.9

6.8

100.2

5.7

153.5

9.9

1.03

75

152.0

9.8

1.03

75

589ENMX26S7

1.01139.7

590ENMX24S7

1.01139.7

87.8

2.4

87.6

1.5

117.1

8.5

117.0

7.6

0.0

SW

0.0

949 1.02140.2

26.

2

50.1

27.2

49.

9

207JANET 7

68.7

24.

8

68.

0

25.6

139.

4

20.6

139.0

19.3

SW 151

.8

1.02140.3

4242HIGH RI9

1.0426.0

2242HIGH RA9

1.0426.0

15.8

10.9

0.9324915

.8

10.9

0.93249

13.2 8.0

2.5

1.5

2.5

1.5

13.2

8.0

4241BLACK D1

1.0025.1

13.2

4.1

0.98

279

9913.1

3.1

4238BLACK D9

1.0325.8

13.2

4.1

1.05

58

9913.1

3.1

3252CARSELA9

1.0325.6

12.5

1.7

1.03

25

318.3

0.6

994.1

0.3

3239OKOTOKS8

1.0125.4

4239OKOTOKS9

1.0425.9

9.4

5.1

0.97

73

9.5

5.4

1.05

58

9.4

4.7

999.4

4.7

3547ENMX54S9

1.0325.8

19.5

1.9

0.97

73

30.0

0

9919.5

0.4

G1 G2 G3 G4 G5

524265ST1

1.0673.1

13.8

4.6

0.94

236HIGH RI8

1.0673.2

13.7

4.2

1

241BLACK D8

1.0169.5

13.7

4.2

13.2

4.1

4243HARTELL9

1.044.3

0.9

0.7

0.95

65

30.0

0

990.9

0.6

4252CARSLAND

0.9913.6

23.5

13.3

-30.

00

1.03

32

317.7

3.4

9915.6

7.0

3251CARSELA2

1.0013.8

4251CARSELA1

1.0314.2

0.6

0.3

30.0

0

1

21.6

12.7

30.0

01

370.6

0.3

2

370.6

0.3

122.2

13.0R

3247CAVAL_A

1.0113.9 4247

CAVAL_B

1.0113.9

15.4

16.1

0.93

18

-30.

00

14.8

16.0

0.93

18

-30.

00

371.4

0.7

116.9

16.8R

372.0

1.02

16.9

17.0R

30.0

0.0R

1

Page 59: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Okotoks 678S and

2017 SP

P1670 PRE-CONNECTION - DIAGRAM A-19N-1: 691L JANET 74S TO CHESTERMERE 419SMON, MAY 30 2016 10:53

Okotoks 678S Substation

High River 65S Upgrades

434L

646L

753L

727L

727L

850L

691L

876L

733L

Bus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate A1.105OV 0.899UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

617FOOTHLL1

1.05253.1

643SC1D

1.05252.9

653SC1B

1.05252.9

544ENMX65S4

1.05252.9

-37.

0

-3.1

37.0

-11.9

-37.

0

-3.1

37.0

-11.

936.3

-13.4

-36.

3

0.1

36.3

-13.4

-36.

3

0.1

640FOOTHLL2

1.04143.6

73.2

3.0

1.0125 73.2

3.0

1.0125

239OKOTOKS7

1.03142.1

242HIGH RI7

1.03142.1

-52.4

-1.3

52.9

1.0

-92.

6

0.6

93.5

1.6

253BLACKIE7

1.03142.5

886MAG TAP7

1.03142.1

960HART TAP

1.02141.4

41.4

-21.

5

-40.5

20.7

-1.0

1.5

1.0

-1.9

10.6

1.8

-10.6

-3.6

1.0

-2.6

-1.0

2.1

238BLACK D7

1.02141.2

243HARTELL7

1.02141.4

-9.6

-3.4

9.7

2.9

-0.9

-0.7

0.9

0.7

254GLEICHE7

1.05144.5

252CARSELA7

1.02141.3

50.9-48.9

34.4

10.5

-15.2

-10.4

32.5

-6.6

-32.1

4.6

5251WYNDHAM

1.02141.3

-13.9

-7.4

13.9

7.3

340NAMAKA 7

1.06146.3

36.2

-38.9

-35.5

38.7

247CAVALIER

1.06146.6

259STRATHM7

1.07147.1

315HUSSAR

1.05144.8

24.9

25.2

-24.9

-26.0

-18.1

-4.2

18.2

1.5

5247CAV T101

1.06146.8

-24.9

-25.2

1

-20.9

22.7

21.1

-23.6

13.0

240MAGCAN 7

-0.0

0.0

0.0

-0.2

1.03142.1

547ENMX54S7

1.02140.9

570ENMX65S7

1.02141.3

-95.7

-1.1

96.0

2.0

143.7

13.6

1.02

5

142.3

13.5

1.02

5

589ENMX26S7

1.02141.0

590ENMX24S7

1.02141.1

79.2

-1.4

-79.0

1.9

110.5

14.0

-110.3

-13.2

-33.7

949 1.07147.2

0.0

-2.2

0.0

0.0

207JANET 7

156.

0

24.1

-155.6

-22.4

1.03141.9

SW

0.0

0.0

-0.0

SW

-27.

7

SW

-10.1

SW

-0.0

4242HIGH RI9

1.0526.3

2242HIGH RA9

1.0526.3

15.8

7.2

0.9561

15.8

7.2

0.9561

13.2 5.1

2.5

1.0

2.5

1.0

13.2

5.1

4241BLACK D1

1.0426.0

9.6

3.3

0.94

007

9.6

2.8

4238BLACK D9

1.0426.1

9.6

3.4

1.03

64

9.6

2.8

3252CARSELA9

1.0325.9

11.9

4.4

1.03

25

7.9

2.4

3.9

1.2

3239OKOTOKS8

1.0225.5

4239OKOTOKS9

1.0425.9

9.4

5.1

0.98

983

9.5

5.4

1.03

64

9.4

4.7

9.4

4.7

3547ENMX54S9

1.0426.0

17.2

6.9

0.95

853

30.0

0

17.1

5.6

524265ST1

1.0673.2

10.0

3.3

0.9625

236HIGH RI8

1.0471.5

-10.0

-3.1

0.97

5

241BLACK D8

0.9968.6

10.0

3.1

-9.6

-3.3

4243HARTELL9

1.074.4

0.9

0.70.

9565

2

30.0

0

0.9

0.6

4252CARSLAND

1.0314.1

23.7

13.6

-30.

00

1.05

26

7.8

3.5

15.7

7.2

3251CARSELA2

1.0214.1

4251CARSELA1

1.0414.4

-0.6

-0.3

30.0

0

1

14.6

8.3

30.0

01

0.6

0.3

0.6

0.3

15.2

8.6R

3247CAVAL_A

1.0113.9

4247CAVAL_B

1.0113.9

12.9

13.1

0.93

176

-30.

00

12.1

13.1

0.93

176

-30.

00

1.3

0.7

14.1

13.8R

2.0

1.0

14.1

14.1R

0.0

0.0R

1

Page 60: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades

Transmission Project Delivery

R[x] 37

Public R2-2016-07-27

Attachment B

Post-Project Power Flow Diagrams (Scenarios 3 to 4)

Page 61: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Table 1: Summary of System Performance without Applying Mitigation (Element Loading) - 2017 SP Post-Project Category B

Table 2: Summary of System Performance without Applying Mitigation (Element Loading) - 2017 WP Post-Project Category B

Contingency Thermal Overloads Overload

%

Figure in Attachment

B

N-G: Normal Operation None -- B-1

691L Janet 74S to Chestermere 419S

876L Blackie 253S – Gleichen 179S

122 B-2

434L High River 65S to Foothills 237S

691L Janet 74S – Chestermere 419S

116 B-3

646L Okotoks 678S to Foothills 237S

691L Janet 74S – Chestermere 419S

101 B-4

753L High River 65S to Blackie 253S

691L Janet 74S – Chestermere 419S

101 B-5

PCES01L Namaka 428S to Cavalier Power Plant

691L Janet 74S – Chestermere 419S

113 B-6

Cavalier transformer 691L Janet 74S – Chestermere 419S

113 B-7

876L Blackie 253S to Gleichen 179S

691L Janet 74S – Chestermere 419S

111 B-8

733L Namaka 428S to Gleichen 179S None - B-9

Contingency Thermal Overloads Overload

%

Figure in Attachment

B

N-G: Normal Operation None -- B-10

691L Janet 74S to Chestermere 419S

876L Blackie 253S – Gleichen 179S

111 B-11

434L High River 65S to Foothills 237S

691L Janet 74S – Chestermere 419S

105 B-12

646L Okotoks 678S to Foothills 237S

None -- B-13

753L High River 65S to Blackie 253S

None -- B-14

Page 62: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Table 3: Summary of System Performance with Mitigation (Element Loading) - 2017 SP Post-

Project Category B

PCES01L Namaka 428S to Cavalier Power Plant

691L Janet 74S – Chestermere 419S

103 B-15

Cavalier 138/13.8 kV transformer

691L Janet 74S – Chestermere 419S

103 B-16

876L Blackie 253S to Gleichen 179S None -- B-17

733L Namaka 428S to Gleichen 179S None -- B-18

Contingency Thermal Overloads

Overload

%

Mitigation Approach

Post Mitigation

Performance

%

Loading

Figure in Attachment

B

691L Janet 74S – Chestermere 419S

876L Blackie 253S – Gleichen 179S 122 Project

1631 SPS 73 B-19

434L Foothills 237S - High River 65S

691L Janet 74S – Chestermere 419S 116 Project

1631 SPS 84 B-20

PCES01L Namaka 428S – Cavalier Power Plant

691L Janet 74S – Chestermere 419S 113 Project

1631 SPS 66 B-21

Cavalier 138/13.8 kV transformer

691L Janet 74S – Chestermere 419S 113 Project

1631 SPS 66 B-22

876L Blackie 253S – Gleichen 179S

691L Janet 74S – Chestermere 419S 111 Project

1631 SPS 80 B-23

646L Foothills 237S – Okotoks 678S

691L Janet 74S – Chestermere 419S 101

Real-time operational

practice

N/A

N/A

753L High River 65S – Blackie 253S

691L Janet 74S – Chestermere 419S 101

Real-time operational

practice

N/A

N/A

Page 63: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Table 4: Summary of System Performance with Mitigation (Element Loading) - 2017 WP Post-

Project Category B

Contingency Thermal Overloads

Overload

%

Mitigation Approach

Post Mitigation

Performance

%

Loading

Figure in Attachment

B

691L Janet 74S – Chestermere 419S

876L Blackie 253S – Gleichen 179S 111

Project 1631 SPS

64

B-24

434L Foothills 237S - High River 65S

691L Janet 74S – Chestermere 419S 105

Real-time operational

practice

N/A

N/A

Namaka 428S – Cavalier Power Plant

691L Janet 74S – Chestermere 419S 103

Real-time operational

practice

N/A

N/A

Cavalier 138/13.8 kV transformer

691L Janet 74S – Chestermere 419S 103

Real-time operational

practice

N/A

N/A

Page 64: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Okotoks 678S and

2017 SP

P1670 POST-CONNECTION - DIAGRAM B-1N-0: NORMAL OPERATIONTHU, MAY 26 2016 13:44

Okotoks 678S Substation

High River 65S Upgrades

434L

646L

753L

727L

727L

850L

691L

876L

733L

Bus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate A1.105OV 0.898UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

617FOOTHLL1

1.05252.6

643SC1D

1.05252.7

653SC1B

1.05252.7

544ENMX65S4

1.05252.8

-47.

3

-5.4

47.3

-9.3

-47.

3

-5.4

47.3

-9.3

34.7

-5.8

-34.

6

-7.534.7

-5.8

-34.

6

-7.5

640FOOTHLL2

1.04142.8

81.9

12.9

1.0125 81.9

12.9

1.0125

239OKOTOKS7

1.02140.4

242HIGH RI7

1.02140.6

-60.8

-8.1

61.6

8.5

-101

.1

-10.

0

102.

2

12.9

253BLACKIE7

1.02141.1

886MAG TAP7

1.02140.8

960HART TAP

1.01139.9

17.4

-12.

7

-17.2

10.3

7.0

-10.

7

-7.0

10.3

10.6

1.8

-10.6

-3.6

-7.0

-15.8

7.0

15.4

238BLACK D7

1.01139.7

243HARTELL7

1.01139.9

-9.6

-3.4

9.7

2.9

-0.9

-0.7

0.9

0.7

254GLEICHE7

1.03142.7

252CARSELA7

1.01140.0

13.9-13.6

13.7

-3.3

-8.9

3.4

18.4

-5.2

-18.3

2.6

5251WYNDHAM

1.02140.1

-13.9

-11.8

13.9

11.7

340NAMAKA 7

1.04144.1

0.9

-18.2

-0.8

16.7

247CAVALIER

1.05144.7

259STRATHM7

1.04142.9

315HUSSAR

1.03142.5

24.9

53.9

-24.8

-54.4

-18.1

-4.6

18.2

1.9

SW

-26.

1

SW

-9.8

5247CAV T101

1.05145.1

-24.9

-53.9

1

13.9

-27.2

-13.7

26.3

6.5

240MAGCAN 7

0.0

25.5

0.0

-25.7

SW

-25.5

1.02141.0

547ENMX54S7

1.01139.5

570ENMX65S7

1.01139.8

-94.4

3.2

94.7

-2.3

146.9

8.5

1.03

75

145.5

8.4

1.03

75

589ENMX26S7

1.01139.5

590ENMX24S7

1.01139.6

86.7

-4.6

-86.5

5.4

110.7

10.5

-110.6

-9.7

-16.8

SW

-0.0

949 1.01139.8

-34.

8

46.0

35.8

-45.

7

207JANET 7

77.4

-20.

2

-76.

6

21.3

134.

5

19.3

-134.2

-18.2

SW

-151

.7

1.02140.3

4242HIGH RI9

1.0526.1

2242HIGH RA9

1.0426.1

28.0

14.1

0.93249

28.0

14.1

0.93249

23.4 9.0

4.5

1.7

4.5

1.7

23.4

9.0

4241BLACK D1

1.0325.7

9.6

3.4

0.94

007

999.6

2.8

4238BLACK D9

1.0526.3

9.6

3.4

1.05

58

999.6

2.8

3252CARSELA9

1.0225.6

11.9

4.4

1.03

25

317.9

2.4

993.9

1.2

3239OKOTOKS8

1.0225.5

4239OKOTOKS9

1.0425.9

16.5

9.5

0.96

477

16.5

10.2

1.07

52

16.4

8.2

9916.4

8.2

3547ENMX54S9

1.0325.7

17.2

6.9

0.95

853

30.0

0

9917.1

5.6

G1 G2 G3 G4 G5

5239OKOTOKS10

1.0325.8

9.4

0.95

371

16.4

8.299

16.5

524265ST1

1.0572.4

10.0

3.4

0.9625

236HIGH RI8

1.0270.7

-10.0

-3.2

0.97

5

241BLACK D8

0.9867.8

10.0

3.2

-9.6

-3.4

4243HARTELL9

1.054.4

0.9

0.70.

9565

2

30.0

0

990.9

0.6

4252CARSLAND

1.0214.0

23.7

13.7

-30.

00

1.05

26

317.8

3.5

9915.7

7.2

3251CARSELA2

1.0114.0

4251CARSELA1

1.0414.4

-0.6

-0.3

30.0

0

1

14.6

12.8

30.0

01

370.6

0.3

2

370.6

0.3

115.2

13.1R

3247CAVAL_A

1.0214.1

4247CAVAL_B

1.0214.1

12.9

28.4

0.93

176

-30.

00

12.1

28.3

0.93

176

-30.

00

371.3

0.7

114.1

29.1R

372.0

1.02

14.1

29.3R

30.0

0.0R

1

Page 65: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Okotoks 678S and

2017 SP

P1670 POST-CONNECTION - DIAGRAM B-2N-1: 691L JANET 74S TO CHESTERMERE 419STHU, MAY 26 2016 13:44

Okotoks 678S Substation

High River 65S Upgrades

434L

646L

753L

727L

727L

850L

691L

876L

733L

Bus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate A1.105OV 0.898UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

617FOOTHLL1

1.05251.3

643SC1D

1.05251.7

653SC1B

1.05251.7

544ENMX65S4

1.05252.4

-54.

4

-8.7

54.5

-5.6

-54.

4

-8.7

54.5

-5.6

73.7

4.2

-73.

5

-16.

3

73.7

4.2

-73.

5

-16.

3

640FOOTHLL2

1.03141.6

128.

0

25.0

1.0125 128.

0

25.0

1.0125

239OKOTOKS7

1.00137.7

242HIGH RI7

1.00138.0

-92.9

-11.0

94.6

15.4

-158

.2

-14.

4

161.

1

24.0

253BLACKIE7

0.98134.9

886MAG TAP7

1.00138.1

960HART TAP

0.99137.2

75.8

-10.

4

-73.1

13.8

5.8

-9.0

-5.8

8.6

10.6

1.9

-10.6

-3.6

-5.7

-16.5

5.8

16.1

238BLACK D7

0.99137.0

243HARTELL7

0.99137.2

-9.6

-3.4

9.7

3.0

-0.9

-0.7

0.9

0.7

254GLEICHE7

0.95131.6

252CARSELA7

0.98135.4

99.5-93.3

30.7

26.7

-7.6

-26.4

49.2

-1.7

-48.3

1.5

5251WYNDHAM

0.98135.5

-13.9

-12.2

13.9

12.1

340NAMAKA 7

0.95131.7

80.5

-35.3

-78.2

38.9

247CAVALIER

0.96132.5

259STRATHM7

0.93129.0

315HUSSAR

0.94129.6

24.8

66.3

-24.7

-66.5

-18.1

-6.7

18.3

4.6

SW

-21.

3

SW

-8.1

5247CAV T101

0.96133.1

-24.8

-66.3

1

-62.6

-12.2

63.6

13.3

6.1

240MAGCAN 7

-0.0

24.6

0.0

-24.7

SW

-24.6

1.00138.4

547ENMX54S7

1.01139.2

570ENMX65S7

1.01139.6

-91.9

3.4

92.2

-2.6

136.7

8.4

1.03

75

135.4

8.3

1.03

75

589ENMX26S7

1.01139.3

590ENMX24S7

1.01139.4

72.9

-2.8

-72.7

3.2

106.8

10.5

-106.7

-9.8

-19.9

SW

-0.0

949 0.90124.0

41.7

26.0

-40.

8

-25.

5

207JANET 7

158.

8

13.9

-158.3

-12.0

SW

-151

.1

1.01140.0

4242HIGH RI9

1.0225.6

2242HIGH RA9

1.0225.5

28.0

14.2

0.93249

28.0

14.2

0.93249

23.4 9.0

4.5

1.7

4.5

1.7

23.4

9.0

4241BLACK D1

1.0125.1

9.6

3.4

0.94

007

999.6

2.8

4238BLACK D9

1.0325.7

9.6

3.4

1.05

58

999.6

2.8

3252CARSELA9

0.9924.7

11.9

4.4

1.03

25

317.9

2.4

993.9

1.2

3239OKOTOKS8

1.0025.0

4239OKOTOKS9

1.0125.4

16.5

9.5

0.96

477

16.5

10.2

1.07

52

16.4

8.2

9916.4

8.2

3547ENMX54S9

1.0325.7

17.2

6.9

0.95

853

30.0

0

9917.1

5.6

G1 G2 G3 G4 G5

5239OKOTOKS10

1.0125.3

9.5

0.95

371

16.4

8.299

16.5

524265ST1

1.0371.0

10.0

3.4

0.9625

236HIGH RI8

1.0069.3

-10.0

-3.2

0.97

5

241BLACK D8

0.9666.4

10.0

3.2

-9.6

-3.4

4243HARTELL9

1.034.3

0.9

0.70.

9565

2

30.0

0

990.9

0.6

4252CARSLAND

0.9813.5

23.7

13.9

-30.

00

1.05

26

317.8

3.5

9915.7

7.2

3251CARSELA2

0.9813.5

4251CARSELA1

1.0113.9

-0.6

-0.3

30.0

0

1

14.6

13.3

30.0

01

370.6

0.3

2

370.6

0.3

115.2

13.6H

3247CAVAL_A

0.9413.0

4247CAVAL_B

0.9613.2

12.9

30.3

0.93

176

-30.

00

12.1

40.9

0.93

176

-30.

00

371.3

0.7

114.1

31.0H

372.0

1.02

14.1

31.0H

30.0

10.9H

1

Page 66: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Okotoks 678S and

2017 SP

P1670 POST-CONNECTION - DIAGRAM B-3N-1: 434L HIGH RIVER 65S TO FOOTHILLS 237STHU, MAY 26 2016 13:45

Okotoks 678S Substation

High River 65S Upgrades

434L

646L

753L

727L

727L

850L

691L

876L

733L

Bus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate A1.105OV 0.898UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

617FOOTHLL1

1.05252.0

643SC1D

1.05252.3

653SC1B

1.05252.3

544ENMX65S4

1.05252.5

-46.

3

-7.3

46.3

-7.4

-46.

3

-7.3

46.3

-7.4

27.8

-1.6

-27.

8

-11.

7

27.8

-1.6

-27.

8

-11.

7

640FOOTHLL2

1.03142.3

74.0

19.0

1.0125 74.0

19.0

1.0125

239OKOTOKS7

0.98135.5

242HIGH RI7

0.97133.6

-143.7

-20.1

148.

0

34.3

253BLACKIE7

0.99136.1

886MAG TAP7

0.98134.8

960HART TAP

0.96132.8

-4.1

-16.

4

4.2

14.1

-72.

6

-18.

2

73.0

18.8

10.6

2.1

-10.6

-3.7

73.5

-4.3

-73.0

4.8

238BLACK D7

0.96132.6

243HARTELL7

0.96132.8

-9.6

-3.5

9.7

3.0

-0.9

-0.7

0.9

0.7

254GLEICHE7

1.01140.0

252CARSELA7

0.98135.0

-5.25.5

18.0

-1.0

-9.0

1.0

20.8

-5.1

-20.6

2.8

5251WYNDHAM

0.98135.1

-13.9

-12.2

13.9

12.1

340NAMAKA 7

1.03142.4

-18.2

-22.5

18.4

21.3

247CAVALIER

1.04143.2

259STRATHM7

1.03141.6

315HUSSAR

1.02140.8

24.8

62.0

-24.8

-62.4

-18.1

-4.9

18.2

2.3

SW

-25.

6

SW

-9.5

5247CAV T101

1.04143.7

-24.8

-62.0

1

33.4

-29.7

-33.0

29.3

6.7

240MAGCAN 7

-0.0

23.4

0.0

-23.6

SW

-23.4

0.98135.1

547ENMX54S7

1.01139.3

570ENMX65S7

1.01139.7

-94.8

3.4

95.1

-2.4

149.2

8.4

1.03

75

147.8

8.3

1.03

75

589ENMX26S7

1.01139.3

590ENMX24S7

1.01139.5

90.0

-4.9

-89.8

5.8

111.6

10.3

-111.4

-9.5

-20.9

SW

-0.0

949 1.01139.2

-54.

3

48.1

55.9

-46.

3

207JANET 7

98.0

-19.

6

-96.

7

21.9

128.

2

19.7

-127.9

-18.7

SW

-151

.3

1.02140.1

4242HIGH RI9

0.9924.7

2242HIGH RA9

0.9824.6

28.0

14.4

0.93249

28.0

14.5

0.93249

23.4 9.0

4.5

1.7

4.5

1.7

23.4

9.0

4241BLACK D1

0.9724.2

9.6

3.4

0.94

007

999.6

2.8

4238BLACK D9

0.9924.9

9.6

3.5

1.05

58

999.6

2.8

3252CARSELA9

0.9924.7

11.9

4.4

1.03

25

317.9

2.4

993.9

1.2

3239OKOTOKS8

0.9824.5

4239OKOTOKS9

1.0024.9

16.5

9.6

0.96

477

16.5

10.3

1.07

52

16.4

8.2

9916.4

8.2

3547ENMX54S9

1.0325.7

17.2

6.9

0.95

853

30.0

0

9917.1

5.6

G1 G2 G3 G4 G5

5239OKOTOKS10

0.9924.8

9.5

0.95

371

16.4

8.299

16.5

524265ST1

1.0068.7

10.0

3.6

0.9625

236HIGH RI8

0.9767.1

-10.0

-3.3

0.97

5

241BLACK D8

0.9364.0

10.0

3.3

-9.6

-3.4

4243HARTELL9

1.004.2

0.9

0.70.

9565

2

30.0

0

990.9

0.6

4252CARSLAND

0.9713.4

23.7

13.9

-30.

00

1.05

26

317.8

3.5

9915.7

7.2

3251CARSELA2

0.9813.5

4251CARSELA1

1.0113.9

-0.6

-0.3

30.0

0

1

14.6

13.3

30.0

01

370.6

0.3

2

370.6

0.3

115.2

13.6H

3247CAVAL_A

1.0114.0

4247CAVAL_B

1.0214.1

12.8

30.3

0.93

176

-30.

00

12.1

35.4

0.93

176

-30.

00

371.3

0.7

114.1

31.0H

372.0

1.02

14.1

31.0H

30.0

5.4R

1

Page 67: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Okotoks 678S and

2017 SP

P1670 POST-CONNECTION - DIAGRAM B-4N-1: 646L OKOTOKS 678S TO FOOTHILLS 237STHU, MAY 26 2016 13:45

Okotoks 678S Substation

High River 65S Upgrades

434L

646L

753L

727L

727L

850L

691L

876L

733L

Bus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate A1.105OV 0.898UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

617FOOTHLL1

1.05252.3

643SC1D

1.05252.5

653SC1B

1.05252.5

544ENMX65S4

1.05252.7

-46.

9

-6.3

47.0

-8.3

-46.

9

-6.3

47.0

-8.3

32.2

-3.6

-32.

2

-9.632.2

-3.6

-32.

2

-9.6

640FOOTHLL2

1.03142.5

79.1

15.9

1.0125 79.1

15.9

1.0125

239OKOTOKS7

0.99137.1

242HIGH RI7

1.01138.8

-155

.4

-18.

6

158.

2

27.8

253BLACKIE7

1.01139.2

886MAG TAP7

1.00138.2

960HART TAP

1.00138.1

18.7

-12.

8

-18.5

10.5

60.1

-2.3

-59.8

2.5

10.6

1.9

-10.6

-3.6

-59.5

-22.1

59.8

22.3

238BLACK D7

1.00137.8

243HARTELL7

1.00138.1

-9.6

-3.4

9.7

2.9

-0.9

-0.7

0.9

0.7

254GLEICHE7

1.03141.8

252CARSELA7

1.00137.4

6.8-6.6

15.8

-11.6

-10.5

11.7

10.1

-7.2

-10.0

4.5

5251WYNDHAM

1.00137.5

-13.9

-12.2

13.9

12.1

340NAMAKA 7

1.04143.6

-6.2

-20.3

6.3

18.8

247CAVALIER

1.05144.3

259STRATHM7

1.03142.5

315HUSSAR

1.03142.0

24.8

57.6

-24.8

-58.1

-18.1

-4.7

18.2

2.0

SW

-25.

9

SW

-9.7

5247CAV T101

1.05144.7

-24.8

-57.6

1

21.0

-28.4

-20.8

27.7

8.4

240MAGCAN 7

-0.0

24.6

0.0

-24.8

SW

-24.6

1.00138.5

547ENMX54S7

1.01139.4

570ENMX65S7

1.01139.8

-94.6

3.3

94.9

-2.4

147.7

8.4

1.03

75

146.3

8.3

1.03

75

589ENMX26S7

1.01139.4

590ENMX24S7

1.01139.6

87.9

-4.8

-87.7

5.7

111.0

10.4

-110.9

-9.6

-18.9

SW

-0.0

949 1.01139.6

-41.

9

47.2

43.2

-46.

3

207JANET 7

84.9

-20.

4

-83.

9

21.9

132.

2

19.7

-131.9

-18.5

SW

-151

.5

1.02140.2

4242HIGH RI9

1.0325.8

2242HIGH RA9

1.0325.7

28.0

14.2

0.93249

28.0

14.2

0.93249

23.4 9.0

4.5

1.7

4.5

1.7

23.4

9.0

4241BLACK D1

1.0125.3

9.6

3.4

0.94

007

999.6

2.8

4238BLACK D9

1.0425.9

9.6

3.4

1.05

58

999.6

2.8

3252CARSELA9

1.0125.1

11.9

4.4

1.03

25

317.9

2.4

993.9

1.2

3239OKOTOKS8

0.9924.9

4239OKOTOKS9

1.0125.2

16.5

9.5

0.96

477

16.5

10.3

1.07

52

16.4

8.2

9916.4

8.2

3547ENMX54S9

1.0325.7

17.2

6.9

0.95

853

30.0

0

9917.1

5.6

G1 G2 G3 G4 G5

5239OKOTOKS10

1.0125.2

9.5

0.95

371

16.4

8.299

16.5

524265ST1

1.0471.4

10.0

3.4

0.9625

236HIGH RI8

1.0169.7

-10.0

-3.2

0.97

5

241BLACK D8

0.9766.8

10.0

3.2

-9.6

-3.4

4243HARTELL9

1.044.3

0.9

0.70.

9565

2

30.0

0

990.9

0.6

4252CARSLAND

0.9913.7

23.7

13.8

-30.

00

1.05

26

317.8

3.5

9915.7

7.2

3251CARSELA2

1.0013.7

4251CARSELA1

1.0214.1

-0.6

-0.3

30.0

0

1

14.6

13.3

30.0

01

370.6

0.3

2

370.6

0.3

115.2

13.6H

3247CAVAL_A

1.0214.1

4247CAVAL_B

1.0214.1

12.8

30.3

0.93

176

-30.

00

12.1

30.5

0.93

176

-30.

00

371.3

0.7

114.1

31.0H

372.0

1.02

14.1

31.0H

30.0

0.5R

1

Page 68: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Okotoks 678S and

2017 SP

P1670 POST-CONNECTION - DIAGRAM B-5N-1: 753L HIGH RIVER 65S TO BLACKIE 253STHU, MAY 26 2016 13:45

Okotoks 678S Substation

High River 65S Upgrades

434L

646L

753L

727L

727L

850L

691L

876L

733L

Bus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate A1.105OV 0.898UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

617FOOTHLL1

1.05252.3

643SC1D

1.05252.5

653SC1B

1.05252.5

544ENMX65S4

1.05252.7

-46.

8

-6.2

46.9

-8.4

-46.

8

-6.2

46.9

-8.4

32.0

-3.5

-32.

0

-9.832.0

-3.5

-32.

0

-9.8

640FOOTHLL2

1.03142.6

78.8

16.1

1.0125 78.8

16.1

1.0125

239OKOTOKS7

1.01140.0

242HIGH RI7

1.02140.1

-62.0

-9.0

62.7

9.6

-93.

9

-16.

0

94.8

18.5

253BLACKIE7

1.02141.4

886MAG TAP7

1.02140.3

960HART TAP

1.01139.4

17.3

-17.

5

-17.2

17.1

10.6

1.9

-10.6

-3.6

-17.2

-8.8

17.2

8.4

238BLACK D7

1.01139.2

243HARTELL7

1.01139.4

-9.6

-3.4

9.7

2.9

-0.9

-0.7

0.9

0.7

254GLEICHE7

1.04142.9

252CARSELA7

1.01140.0

7.7-7.6

10.0

7.8

-15.6

-7.7

29.7

-11.3

-29.4

9.3

5251WYNDHAM

1.01140.1

-13.9

-11.8

13.9

11.7

340NAMAKA 7

1.04144.1

-5.2

-14.5

5.3

12.9

247CAVALIER

1.05144.8

259STRATHM7

1.04142.9

315HUSSAR

1.03142.6

24.9

53.6

-24.8

-54.1

-18.1

-4.6

18.2

1.9

SW

-26.

1

SW

-9.8

5247CAV T101

1.05145.2

-24.9

-53.6

1

20.0

-30.5

-19.8

29.8

13.4

240MAGCAN 7

0.0

25.4

0.0

-25.5

SW

-25.4

1.02140.6

547ENMX54S7

1.01139.4

570ENMX65S7

1.01139.8

-94.6

3.3

94.9

-2.4

147.7

8.2

1.03

75

146.3

8.1

1.03

75

589ENMX26S7

1.01139.5

590ENMX24S7

1.01139.6

87.8

-5.1

-87.6

6.0

111.0

10.3

-110.9

-9.5

-13.4

SW

-0.0

949 1.01139.8

-40.

9

49.4

42.2

-48.

4

207JANET 7

84.0

-22.

6

-83.

0

24.1

132.

6

20.3

-132.2

-19.1

SW

-151

.6

1.02140.3

4242HIGH RI9

1.0426.0

2242HIGH RA9

1.0426.0

28.0

14.1

0.93249

28.0

14.1

0.93249

23.4 9.0

4.5

1.7

4.5

1.7

23.4

9.0

4241BLACK D1

1.0225.6

9.6

3.4

0.94

007

999.6

2.8

4238BLACK D9

1.0526.2

9.6

3.4

1.05

58

999.6

2.8

3252CARSELA9

1.0225.6

11.9

4.4

1.03

25

317.9

2.4

993.9

1.2

3239OKOTOKS8

1.0225.4

4239OKOTOKS9

1.0325.8

16.5

9.5

0.96

477

16.5

10.2

1.07

52

16.4

8.2

9916.4

8.2

3547ENMX54S9

1.0325.7

17.2

6.9

0.95

853

30.0

0

9917.1

5.6

G1 G2 G3 G4 G5

5239OKOTOKS10

1.0325.7

9.4

0.95

371

16.4

8.299

16.5

524265ST1

1.0572.1

10.0

3.4

0.9625

236HIGH RI8

1.0270.4

-10.0

-3.2

0.97

5

241BLACK D8

0.9867.6

10.0

3.2

-9.6

-3.4

4243HARTELL9

1.054.4

0.9

0.70.

9565

2

30.0

0

990.9

0.6

4252CARSLAND

1.0114.0

23.7

13.7

-30.

00

1.05

26

317.8

3.5

9915.7

7.2

3251CARSELA2

1.0114.0

4251CARSELA1

1.0414.4

-0.6

-0.3

30.0

0

1

14.6

12.9

30.0

01

370.6

0.3

2

370.6

0.3

115.2

13.2R

3247CAVAL_A

1.0214.1

4247CAVAL_B

1.0214.1

12.8

28.3

0.93

176

-30.

00

12.1

28.1

0.93

176

-30.

00

371.3

0.7

114.1

29.0R

372.0

1.02

14.1

29.1R

30.0

0.0R

1

Page 69: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Okotoks 678S and

2017 SP

P1670 POST-CONNECTION - DIAGRAM B-6N-1: PCES01L NAMAKA 428S TO CAVALIER POWER PLANTTHU, MAY 26 2016 13:45

Okotoks 678S Substation

High River 65S Upgrades

434L

646L

753L

727L

727L

850L

691L

876L

733L

Bus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate A1.105OV 0.898UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

617FOOTHLL1

1.04250.6

643SC1D

1.05251.2

653SC1B

1.05251.2

544ENMX65S4

1.05251.4

-48.

7

-10.

8

48.7

-3.6

-48.

7

-10.

8

48.7

-3.6

37.6

1.5

-37.

5

-14.

5

37.6

1.5

-37.

5

-14.

5

640FOOTHLL2

1.02141.2

86.2

25.3

1.0125 86.2

25.3

1.0125

239OKOTOKS7

1.00137.7

242HIGH RI7

1.00138.0

-63.8

-16.2

64.6

17.2

-106

.4

-24.

4

107.

7

28.2

253BLACKIE7

0.99136.2

886MAG TAP7

1.00138.1

960HART TAP

0.99137.2

23.0

0.8

-22.8

-2.9

6.7

-10.

3

-6.7

9.9

10.6

1.9

-10.6

-3.6

-6.7

-15.2

6.7

14.8

238BLACK D7

0.99137.0

243HARTELL7

0.99137.2

-9.6

-3.4

9.7

3.0

-0.9

-0.7

0.9

0.7

254GLEICHE7

0.97133.5

252CARSELA7

0.99136.1

22.0-21.7

-6.3

-0.8

-1.5

0.8

21.0

2.2

-20.8

-4.5

5251WYNDHAM

0.99136.2

-13.9

-12.2

13.9

12.1

340NAMAKA 7

0.96133.0

8.9

1.7

-8.9

-3.1

247CAVALIER

1.05144.7

259STRATHM7

0.97134.5

315HUSSAR

0.95130.9

-18.1

-6.5

18.3

4.3

SW

-23.

1

SW

-8.3

5247CAV T101

1.05145.1

1

30.7

10.4

-30.5

-11.0

-0.7

240MAGCAN 7

0.0

24.6

0.0

-24.7

SW

-24.6

1.00138.4

547ENMX54S7

1.00138.5

570ENMX65S7

1.01138.9

-94.3

3.0

94.6

-2.1

148.0

11.8

1.03

75

146.5

11.7

1.03

75

589ENMX26S7

1.00138.5

590ENMX24S7

1.00138.5

88.7

0.4

-88.5

0.5

111.0

11.4

-110.8

-10.6

3.7

SW

-0.0

949 0.99136.4

-51.

6

5.4

52.5

-5.1

207JANET 7

94.6

21.6

-93.

3

-19.

5

128.

8

8.8

-128.5

-7.8

SW

-148

.9

1.01139.0

4242HIGH RI9

1.0225.6

2242HIGH RA9

1.0225.5

28.0

14.2

0.93249

28.0

14.2

0.93249

23.4 9.0

4.5

1.7

4.5

1.7

23.4

9.0

4241BLACK D1

1.0125.1

9.6

3.4

0.94

007

999.6

2.8

4238BLACK D9

1.0325.7

9.6

3.4

1.05

58

999.6

2.8

3252CARSELA9

1.0024.9

11.9

4.4

1.03

25

317.9

2.4

993.9

1.2

3239OKOTOKS8

1.0025.0

4239OKOTOKS9

1.0225.4

16.5

9.5

0.96

477

16.5

10.2

1.07

52

16.4

8.2

9916.4

8.2

3547ENMX54S9

1.0225.5

17.2

6.9

0.95

853

30.0

0

9917.1

5.6

G1 G2 G3 G4 G5

5239OKOTOKS10

1.0125.3

9.5

0.95

371

16.4

8.299

16.5

524265ST1

1.0371.0

10.0

3.4

0.9625

236HIGH RI8

1.0069.3

-10.0

-3.2

0.97

5

241BLACK D8

0.9666.4

10.0

3.2

-9.6

-3.4

4243HARTELL9

1.034.3

0.9

0.70.

9565

2

30.0

0

990.9

0.6

4252CARSLAND

0.9813.6

23.7

13.8

-30.

00

1.05

26

317.8

3.5

9915.7

7.2

3251CARSELA2

0.9913.6

4251CARSELA1

1.0114.0

-0.6

-0.3

30.0

0

1

14.6

13.3

30.0

01

370.6

0.3

2

370.6

0.3

115.2

13.6H

3247CAVAL_A

1.0214.1

4247CAVAL_B

1.0214.1

0.93

176

-30.

00

0.93

176

-30.

00

37

1

37 2

3

1

Page 70: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Okotoks 678S and

2017 SP

P1670 POST-CONNECTION - DIAGRAM B-7N-1: CAVALIER TRANSFORMERTHU, MAY 26 2016 13:46

Okotoks 678S Substation

High River 65S Upgrades

434L

646L

753L

727L

727L

850L

691L

876L

733L

Bus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate A1.105OV 0.898UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

617FOOTHLL1

1.04250.7

643SC1D

1.05251.3

653SC1B

1.05251.3

544ENMX65S4

1.05251.4

-48.

7

-10.

7

48.7

-3.7

-48.

7

-10.

7

48.7

-3.7

37.6

1.4

-37.

5

-14.

4

37.6

1.4

-37.

5

-14.

4

640FOOTHLL2

1.02141.2

86.2

25.1

1.0125 86.2

25.1

1.0125

239OKOTOKS7

1.00137.8

242HIGH RI7

1.00138.0

-63.8

-16.1

64.6

17.1

-106

.4

-24.

2

107.

7

28.0

253BLACKIE7

0.99136.3

886MAG TAP7

1.00138.2

960HART TAP

0.99137.3

23.0

0.7

-22.8

-2.8

6.7

-10.

3

-6.7

9.9

10.6

1.9

-10.6

-3.6

-6.7

-15.2

6.7

14.8

238BLACK D7

0.99137.1

243HARTELL7

0.99137.3

-9.6

-3.4

9.7

3.0

-0.9

-0.7

0.9

0.7

254GLEICHE7

0.97133.6

252CARSELA7

0.99136.2

22.0-21.7

-6.0

-0.8

-1.6

0.8

21.0

2.1

-20.8

-4.4

5251WYNDHAM

0.99136.3

-13.9

-12.2

13.9

12.1

340NAMAKA 7

0.96133.1

8.9

1.4

-8.9

-2.8

247CAVALIER

0.96133.1

259STRATHM7

0.98134.6

315HUSSAR

0.95131.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

-0.7

-18.1

-6.4

18.3

4.3

SW

-23.

2

SW

-8.3

5247CAV T101

1.05145.1

1

30.7

9.9

-30.5

-10.5

-0.7

240MAGCAN 7

-0.0

24.6

0.0

-24.8

SW

-24.6

1.00138.4

547ENMX54S7

1.00138.5

570ENMX65S7

1.01138.9

-94.3

3.0

94.6

-2.1

148.0

11.8

1.03

75

146.5

11.6

1.03

75

589ENMX26S7

1.00138.6

590ENMX24S7

1.00138.6

88.7

0.3

-88.5

0.6

111.0

11.4

-110.8

-10.6

3.4

SW

-0.0

949 0.99136.4

-51.

6

5.9

52.5

-5.7

207JANET 7

94.6

21.0

-93.

3

-18.

9

128.

8

8.9

-128.5

-7.9

SW

-149

.0

1.01139.0

4242HIGH RI9

1.0225.6

2242HIGH RA9

1.0225.5

28.0

14.2

0.93249

28.0

14.2

0.93249

23.4 9.0

4.5

1.7

4.5

1.7

23.4

9.0

4241BLACK D1

1.0125.1

9.6

3.4

0.94

007

999.6

2.8

4238BLACK D9

1.0325.7

9.6

3.4

1.05

58

999.6

2.8

3252CARSELA9

1.0024.9

11.9

4.4

1.03

25

317.9

2.4

993.9

1.2

3239OKOTOKS8

1.0025.0

4239OKOTOKS9

1.0225.4

16.5

9.5

0.96

477

16.5

10.2

1.07

52

16.4

8.2

9916.4

8.2

3547ENMX54S9

1.0225.5

17.2

6.9

0.95

853

30.0

0

9917.1

5.6

G1 G2 G3 G4 G5

5239OKOTOKS10

1.0125.3

9.5

0.95

371

16.4

8.299

16.5

524265ST1

1.0371.0

10.0

3.4

0.9625

236HIGH RI8

1.0069.3

-10.0

-3.2

0.97

5

241BLACK D8

0.9666.4

10.0

3.2

-9.6

-3.4

4243HARTELL9

1.034.3

0.9

0.70.

9565

2

30.0

0

990.9

0.6

4252CARSLAND

0.9813.6

23.7

13.8

-30.

00

1.05

26

317.8

3.5

9915.7

7.2

3251CARSELA2

0.9913.6

4251CARSELA1

1.0214.0

-0.6

-0.3

30.0

0

1

14.6

13.3

30.0

01

370.6

0.3

2

370.6

0.3

115.2

13.6H

3247CAVAL_A

1.0214.1

4247CAVAL_B

1.0214.1

0.93

176

-30.

00

0.93

176

-30.

00

37

1

37 2

3

1

Page 71: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Okotoks 678S and

2017 SP

P1670 POST-CONNECTION - DIAGRAM B-8N-1: 876L BLACKIE 253S TO GLEICHEN 179STHU, MAY 26 2016 13:46

Okotoks 678S Substation

High River 65S Upgrades

434L

646L

753L

727L

727L

850L

691L

876L

733L

Bus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate A1.105OV 0.898UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

617FOOTHLL1

1.05252.1

643SC1D

1.05252.3

653SC1B

1.05252.3

544ENMX65S4

1.05252.6

-46.

2

-7.4

46.3

-7.2

-46.

2

-7.4

46.3

-7.2

28.5

-0.1

-28.

5

-13.

2

28.5

-0.1

-28.

5

-13.

2

640FOOTHLL2

1.03142.2

74.8

20.6

1.0125 74.8

20.6

1.0125

239OKOTOKS7

1.01139.2

242HIGH RI7

1.01139.5

-55.8

-14.1

56.4

14.2

-92.

1

-20.

8

93.1

23.2

253BLACKIE7

1.01139.0

886MAG TAP7

1.01139.7

960HART TAP

1.01138.8

8.4

-1.9

-8.4

-0.8

7.1

-10.

9

-7.0

10.5

10.6

1.9

-10.6

-3.6

-7.0

-15.2

7.0

14.8

238BLACK D7

1.00138.6

243HARTELL7

1.01138.8

-9.6

-3.4

9.7

2.9

-0.9

-0.7

0.9

0.7

254GLEICHE7

1.04143.9

252CARSELA7

1.00138.4

-8.3

-3.1

8.4

13.3

0.1

-13.3

-2.8

5251WYNDHAM

1.00138.4

-13.9

-12.2

13.9

12.1

340NAMAKA 7

1.05144.6

-12.8

-4.5

12.8

2.9

247CAVALIER

1.05145.2

259STRATHM7

1.04143.2

315HUSSAR

1.04143.1

24.9

49.9

-24.8

-50.4

-18.1

-4.5

18.2

1.8

SW

-26.

2

SW

-9.9

5247CAV T101

1.06145.6

-24.9

-49.9

1

27.7

-36.7

-27.3

36.3

0.8

240MAGCAN 7

0.0

25.1

0.0

-25.3

SW

-25.1

1.01139.9

547ENMX54S7

1.01139.4

570ENMX65S7

1.01139.8

-94.8

3.5

95.1

-2.6

148.7

7.6

1.03

75

147.2

7.5

1.03

75

589ENMX26S7

1.01139.4

590ENMX24S7

1.01139.6

89.2

-6.1

-88.9

7.0

111.4

10.0

-111.2

-9.2

SW

-0.0

949 1.01139.8

-48.

6

55.7

50.3

-53.

8

207JANET 7

92.3

-27.

5

-91.

1

29.5

130.

1

22.0

-129.7

-20.9

SW

-151

.6

1.02140.3

4242HIGH RI9

1.0425.9

2242HIGH RA9

1.0325.8

28.0

14.1

0.93249

28.0

14.2

0.93249

23.4 9.0

4.5

1.7

4.5

1.7

23.4

9.0

4241BLACK D1

1.0225.5

9.6

3.4

0.94

007

999.6

2.8

4238BLACK D9

1.0426.0

9.6

3.4

1.05

58

999.6

2.8

3252CARSELA9

1.0125.3

11.9

4.4

1.03

25

317.9

2.4

993.9

1.2

3239OKOTOKS8

1.0125.3

4239OKOTOKS9

1.0325.7

16.5

9.5

0.96

477

16.5

10.2

1.07

52

16.4

8.2

9916.4

8.2

3547ENMX54S9

1.0325.7

17.2

6.9

0.95

853

30.0

0

9917.1

5.6

G1 G2 G3 G4 G5

5239OKOTOKS10

1.0225.6

9.5

0.95

371

16.4

8.299

16.5

524265ST1

1.0471.8

10.0

3.4

0.9625

236HIGH RI8

1.0270.1

-10.0

-3.2

0.97

5

241BLACK D8

0.9767.2

10.0

3.2

-9.6

-3.4

4243HARTELL9

1.054.3

0.9

0.70.

9565

2

30.0

0

990.9

0.6

4252CARSLAND

1.0013.8

23.7

13.7

-30.

00

1.05

26

317.8

3.5

9915.7

7.2

3251CARSELA2

1.0013.8

4251CARSELA1

1.0314.2

-0.6

-0.3

30.0

0

1

14.6

13.3

30.0

01

370.6

0.3

2

370.6

0.3

115.2

13.6H

3247CAVAL_A

1.0214.1

4247CAVAL_B

1.0214.1

12.9

26.2

0.93

176

-30.

00

12.1

26.1

0.93

176

-30.

00

371.3

0.7

114.1

26.9R

372.0

1.02

14.1

27.1R

30.0

0.0R

1

Page 72: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Okotoks 678S and

2017 SP

P1670 POST-CONNECTION - DIAGRAM B-9N-1: 733L NAMAKA 428S TO GLEICHEN 179STHU, MAY 26 2016 13:46

Okotoks 678S Substation

High River 65S Upgrades

434L

646L

753L

727L

727L

850L

691L

876L

733L

Bus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate A1.105OV 0.898UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

617FOOTHLL1

1.05251.8

643SC1D

1.05252.2

653SC1B

1.05252.2

544ENMX65S4

1.05252.6

-47.

2

-7.9

47.2

-6.6

-47.

2

-7.9

47.2

-6.6

34.3

1.5

-34.

2

-14.

7

34.3

1.5

-34.

2

-14.

7

640FOOTHLL2

1.03142.0

81.4

22.6

1.0125 81.4

22.6

1.0125

239OKOTOKS7

1.01138.8

242HIGH RI7

1.01139.0

-60.4

-14.9

61.2

15.5

-100

.4

-22.

1

101.

6

25.3

253BLACKIE7

1.00137.9

886MAG TAP7

1.01139.2

960HART TAP

1.00138.3

16.9

-0.9

-16.8

-1.5

6.9

-10.

7

-6.9

10.3

10.6

1.9

-10.6

-3.6

-6.8

-15.3

6.8

14.9

238BLACK D7

1.00138.1

243HARTELL7

1.00138.3

-9.6

-3.4

9.7

2.9

-0.9

-0.7

0.9

0.7

254GLEICHE7

0.99136.3

252CARSELA7

1.00137.6

12.9-12.8

-4.5

-3.9

-2.5

3.9

17.8

1.0

-17.7

-3.5

5251WYNDHAM

1.00137.6

-13.9

-12.2

13.9

12.1

340NAMAKA 7

1.05145.4

247CAVALIER

1.06145.9

259STRATHM7

1.04143.8

315HUSSAR

1.04143.9

24.9

44.0

-24.8

-44.6

-18.1

-4.4

18.2

1.6

SW

-26.

4

SW

-10.0

5247CAV T101

1.06146.2

-24.9

-44.0

1

14.7

-34.2

-14.5

33.5

0.1

240MAGCAN 7

0.0

25.0

0.0

-25.1

SW

-25.0

1.01139.5

547ENMX54S7

1.01139.4

570ENMX65S7

1.01139.7

-94.4

3.6

94.7

-2.7

147.0

7.3

1.03

75

145.6

7.2

1.03

75

589ENMX26S7

1.01139.4

590ENMX24S7

1.01139.6

86.8

-6.1

-86.6

6.9

110.7

10.0

-110.6

-9.2

1.4

SW

-0.0

949 1.01140.0

-35.

6

53.4

36.9

-52.

5

207JANET 7

78.6

-26.

9

-77.

7

28.2

134.

4

21.8

-134.0

-20.6

SW

-151

.6

1.02140.3

4242HIGH RI9

1.0325.8

2242HIGH RA9

1.0325.7

28.0

14.1

0.93249

28.0

14.2

0.93249

23.4 9.0

4.5

1.7

4.5

1.7

23.4

9.0

4241BLACK D1

1.0125.4

9.6

3.4

0.94

007

999.6

2.8

4238BLACK D9

1.0425.9

9.6

3.4

1.05

58

999.6

2.8

3252CARSELA9

1.0125.2

11.9

4.4

1.03

25

317.9

2.4

993.9

1.2

3239OKOTOKS8

1.0125.2

4239OKOTOKS9

1.0225.6

16.5

9.5

0.96

477

16.5

10.2

1.07

52

16.4

8.2

9916.4

8.2

3547ENMX54S9

1.0325.7

17.2

6.9

0.95

853

30.0

0

9917.1

5.6

G1 G2 G3 G4 G5

5239OKOTOKS10

1.0225.5

9.5

0.95

371

16.4

8.299

16.5

524265ST1

1.0471.6

10.0

3.4

0.9625

236HIGH RI8

1.0169.9

-10.0

-3.2

0.97

5

241BLACK D8

0.9767.0

10.0

3.2

-9.6

-3.4

4243HARTELL9

1.044.3

0.9

0.70.

9565

2

30.0

0

990.9

0.6

4252CARSLAND

1.0013.7

23.7

13.8

-30.

00

1.05

26

317.8

3.5

9915.7

7.2

3251CARSELA2

1.0013.8

4251CARSELA1

1.0214.1

-0.6

-0.3

30.0

0

1

14.6

13.3

30.0

01

370.6

0.3

2

370.6

0.3

115.2

13.6H

3247CAVAL_A

1.0214.1

4247CAVAL_B

1.0214.1

12.8

23.1

0.93

176

-30.

00

12.1

22.9

0.93

176

-30.

00

371.3

0.7

114.1

23.8R

372.0

1.02

14.1

23.9R

30.0

0.0R

1

Page 73: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Okotoks 678S and

2017 WP

P1670 POST-CONNECTION - DIAGRAM B-10N-0: NORMAL OPERATIONTHU, MAY 26 2016 14:20

Okotoks 678S Substation

High River 65S Upgrades

434L

646L

753L

727L

727L

850L

691L

876L

733L

Bus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate B1.105OV 0.898UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

617FOOTHLL1

1.06253.3

643SC1D

1.06254.7

653SC1B

1.06254.7

544ENMX65S4

1.05253.1

-49.

9

-20.

0

50.0

5.2

-49.

9

-20.

0

50.0

5.2

30.6

-14.7

-30.

6

1.3

30.6

-14.7

-30.

6

1.3

640FOOTHLL2

1.02141.3

80.5

18.6

1.025 80.5

18.6

1.025

239OKOTOKS7

1.00138.5

242HIGH RI7

1.00138.5

-59.1

-10.8

59.8

11.3

-99.

9

-18.

5

101.

0

21.6

253BLACKIE7

1.01139.8

886MAG TAP7

1.01138.8

960HART TAP

1.00137.6

12.3

-16.

1

-12.1

13.7

3.7

-14.

6

-3.6

14.1

14.2

2.7

-14.1

-4.4

-3.6

-11.3

3.6

10.8

238BLACK D7

0.99137.3

243HARTELL7

1.00137.6

-13.2

-4.2

13.2

3.7

-0.9

-0.7

0.9

0.7

254GLEICHE7

1.03142.4

252CARSELA7

1.01138.7

10.2-10.0

17.7

-1.8

-9.3

1.9

13.3

-7.2

-13.2

4.5

5251WYNDHAM

1.01138.8

-20.9

-10.3

20.9

10.2

340NAMAKA 7

1.04144.1

-3.8

-20.7

3.9

19.3

247CAVALIER

1.05144.6

259STRATHM7

1.04143.0

315HUSSAR

1.05144.8

30.2

35.4

-30.2

-36.1

-9.6

8.0

9.7

-10.8

SW

-26.

2

SW

-10.1

5247CAV T101

1.05144.9

-30.2

-35.4

1

6.6

-22.7

-6.5

21.6

6.9

240MAGCAN 7

-0.0

24.8

0.0

-25.0

SW

-24.8

1.01139.1

547ENMX54S7

1.01139.7

570ENMX65S7

1.01139.9

-98.5

7.2

98.8

-6.1

151.4

9.1

1.03

75

149.9

9.0

1.03

75

589ENMX26S7

1.01139.6

590ENMX24S7

1.01139.6

86.3

2.0

-86.1

-1.3

115.9

8.1

-115.8

-7.2

-20.6

SW

-0.0

949 1.01139.8

-30.

2

45.2

31.1

-45.

1

207JANET 7

72.6

-20.

0

-71.

9

20.9

138.

6

19.8

-138.2

-18.5

1.02140.2

4242HIGH RI9

1.0526.2

2242HIGH RA9

1.0526.1

28.0

20.9

0.89708

28.1

20.9

0.89708

23.4

14.2 4.5

2.7

4.5

2.7

23.4

14.2

4241BLACK D1

1.0025.0

13.2

4.1

0.98

279

13.1

3.1

4238BLACK D9

1.0526.2

13.2

4.2

1.07

52

13.1

3.1

3252CARSELA9

1.0325.7

12.5

1.7

1.03

25

8.3

0.6

4.1

0.3

3239OKOTOKS8

1.0225.5

4239OKOTOKS9

1.0426.0

16.5

9.5

0.95

224

16.5

10.2

1.09

46

16.4

8.2

16.4

8.2

3547ENMX54S9

1.0325.7

19.5

1.9

0.97

73

30.0

0

19.5

0.4

5239OKOTOKS10

0.9824.4

9.6

0.98

988

16.4

8.2

16.5

524265ST1

1.0672.8

13.8

4.6

0.94

236HIGH RI8

1.0672.9

-13.7

-4.2

1

241BLACK D8

1.0069.2

13.7

4.2

-13.2

-4.1

4243HARTELL9

1.044.3

0.9

0.70.

9565

30.0

0

0.9

0.6

4252CARSLAND

0.9913.6

23.5

13.3

-30.

00

1.03

32

7.7

3.4

15.6

7.0

3251CARSELA2

1.0113.9

4251CARSELA1

1.0314.2

-0.6

-0.3

30.0

0

1

21.6

11.8

30.0

01

0.6

0.3

0.6

0.3

22.2

12.1R

3247CAVAL_A

1.0013.8

4247CAVAL_B

1.0113.9

15.4

15.0

0.93

18

-30.

00

14.8

22.2

0.93

18

-30.

00

1.4

0.7

16.9

15.7R

2.0

1.0

16.9

23.2R

0.0

0.0R

1

Page 74: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Okotoks 678S and

2017 WP

P1670 POST-CONNECTION - DIAGRAM B-11N-1: 691L JANET 74S TO CHESTERMERE 419STHU, MAY 26 2016 14:21

Okotoks 678S Substation

High River 65S Upgrades

434L

646L

753L

727L

727L

850L

691L

876L

733L

Bus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate B1.105OV 0.898UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

617FOOTHLL1

1.05252.8

643SC1D

1.06254.1

653SC1B

1.06254.1

544ENMX65S4

1.05252.9

-56.

7

-19.

0

56.7

4.6

-56.

7

-19.

0

56.7

4.6

66.7

-13.2

-66.

6

0.7

66.7

-13.2

-66.

6

0.7

640FOOTHLL2

1.02141.0

123.

3

18.3

1.025 123.

3

18.3

1.025

239OKOTOKS7

1.00137.8

242HIGH RI7

1.00137.9

-89.1

-5.5

90.6

9.3

-153

.1

-8.6

155.

7

17.5

253BLACKIE7

1.00137.7

886MAG TAP7

1.00138.1

960HART TAP

0.99136.9

66.4

-27.

2

-64.0

29.8

2.7

-13.

4

-2.7

13.0

14.2

2.8

-14.1

-4.4

-2.7

-12.1

2.7

11.7

238BLACK D7

0.99136.6

243HARTELL7

0.99136.9

-13.2

-4.2

13.2

3.7

-0.9

-0.7

0.9

0.7

254GLEICHE7

1.01139.2

252CARSELA7

1.00137.4

90.3-84.5

52.0

26.6

-14.3

-26.2

42.3

-11.7

-41.6

10.9

5251WYNDHAM

1.00137.4

-20.9

-11.7

20.9

11.6

340NAMAKA 7

1.02141.2

70.7

-55.1

-68.6

58.1

247CAVALIER

1.03141.9

259STRATHM7

1.01139.2

315HUSSAR

1.03141.8

30.1

57.4

-30.1

-57.9

-9.6

7.5

9.7

-10.3

SW

-24.

8

SW

-9.7

5247CAV T101

1.03142.4

-30.1

-57.4

1

-65.1

-3.3

65.9

4.0

12.8

240MAGCAN 7

0.0

24.6

0.0

-24.7

SW

-24.6

1.00138.4

547ENMX54S7

1.01139.5

570ENMX65S7

1.01139.8

-96.2

7.0

96.5

-6.0

141.9

9.9

1.03

75

140.6

9.7

1.03

75

589ENMX26S7

1.01139.5

590ENMX24S7

1.01139.4

73.5

4.6

-73.3

-4.2

112.3

8.6

-112.2

-7.7

-42.5

SW

-0.0

949 0.98134.7

41.5

24.4

-40.

8

-24.

6

207JANET 7

161.

3

13.8

-160.8

-11.9

1.01140.0

4242HIGH RI9

1.0426.1

2242HIGH RA9

1.0426.0

28.0

20.9

0.89708

28.1

21.0

0.89708

23.4

14.2 4.5

2.7

4.5

2.7

23.4

14.2

4241BLACK D1

0.9924.8

13.2

4.1

0.98

279

13.1

3.1

4238BLACK D9

1.0426.0

13.2

4.2

1.07

52

13.1

3.1

3252CARSELA9

1.0225.4

12.5

1.7

1.03

25

8.3

0.6

4.1

0.3

3239OKOTOKS8

1.0125.3

4239OKOTOKS9

1.0325.9

16.5

9.5

0.95

224

16.5

10.2

1.09

46

16.4

8.2

16.4

8.2

3547ENMX54S9

1.0325.7

19.5

1.9

0.97

73

30.0

0

19.5

0.4

5239OKOTOKS10

0.9724.3

9.6

0.98

988

16.4

8.2

16.5

524265ST1

1.0572.4

13.8

4.6

0.94

236HIGH RI8

1.0572.6

-13.7

-4.2

1

241BLACK D8

1.0068.8

13.7

4.2

-13.2

-4.1

4243HARTELL9

1.034.3

0.9

0.70.

9565

30.0

0

0.9

0.6

4252CARSLAND

0.9813.5

23.5

13.4

-30.

00

1.03

32

7.7

3.4

15.6

7.0

3251CARSELA2

1.0013.7

4251CARSELA1

1.0214.1

-0.6

-0.3

30.0

0

1

21.6

13.3

30.0

01

0.6

0.3

0.6

0.3

22.2

13.6H

3247CAVAL_A

1.0013.8

4247CAVAL_B

1.0113.9

15.5

26.9

0.93

18

-30.

00

14.8

34.1

0.93

18

-30.

00

1.4

0.7

16.9

27.6R

2.0

1.0

16.9

31.0H

0.0

4.1R

1

Page 75: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Okotoks 678S and

2017 WP

P1670 POST-CONNECTION - DIAGRAM B-12N-1: 434L HIGH RIVER 65S TO FOOTHILLS 237STHU, MAY 26 2016 14:21

Okotoks 678S Substation

High River 65S Upgrades

434L

646L

753L

727L

727L

850L

691L

876L

733L

Bus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate B1.105OV 0.898UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

617FOOTHLL1

1.05252.8

643SC1D

1.06254.1

653SC1B

1.06254.1

544ENMX65S4

1.05252.7

-48.

9

-20.

7

48.9

6.1

-48.

9

-20.

7

48.9

6.1

23.8

-10.0

-23.

8

-3.423.8

-10.0

-23.

8

-3.4

640FOOTHLL2

1.02140.7

72.7

24.2

1.025 72.7

24.2

1.025

239OKOTOKS7

0.96132.8

242HIGH RI7

0.94130.3

-140.9

-29.9

145.

3

44.6

253BLACKIE7

0.97134.0

886MAG TAP7

0.96131.8

960HART TAP

0.94129.2

-9.2

-22.

1

9.5

20.2

-74.

9

-29.

0

75.4

29.8

14.2

3.1

-14.1

-4.6

75.9

7.9

-75.4

-7.3

238BLACK D7

0.93128.9

243HARTELL7

0.94129.2

-13.2

-4.3

13.2

3.9

-0.9

-0.7

0.9

0.7

254GLEICHE7

1.01139.5

252CARSELA7

0.96133.0

-9.19.6

24.8

0.4

-9.1

-0.4

15.5

-7.7

-15.4

5.3

5251WYNDHAM

0.96133.1

-20.9

-11.6

20.9

11.5

340NAMAKA 7

1.03142.6

-23.4

-27.9

23.7

27.0

247CAVALIER

1.04143.2

259STRATHM7

1.03141.8

315HUSSAR

1.04143.2

30.2

47.1

-30.1

-47.7

-9.6

7.7

9.7

-10.5

SW

-25.

7

SW

-9.9

5247CAV T101

1.04143.6

-30.2

-47.1

1

26.7

-25.9

-26.4

25.2

6.9

240MAGCAN 7

-0.0

22.4

0.0

-22.5

SW

-22.4

0.96132.1

547ENMX54S7

1.01139.5

570ENMX65S7

1.01139.8

-98.9

7.4

99.2

-6.3

153.7

8.9

1.03

75

152.2

8.8

1.03

75

589ENMX26S7

1.01139.5

590ENMX24S7

1.01139.4

89.7

1.6

-89.5

-0.7

116.7

7.9

-116.6

-7.0

-27.1

SW

-0.0

949 1.01139.3

-50.

2

47.9

51.7

-46.

4

207JANET 7

93.7

-20.

2

-92.

5

22.1

132.

1

20.5

-131.8

-19.3

1.01140.0

4242HIGH RI9

0.9824.4

2242HIGH RA9

0.9724.3

28.0

21.5

0.89708

28.1

21.5

0.89708

23.4

14.2 4.5

2.7

4.5

2.7

23.4

14.2

4241BLACK D1

0.9323.1

13.2

4.3

0.98

279

13.1

3.1

4238BLACK D9

0.9824.5

13.2

4.3

1.07

52

13.1

3.1

3252CARSELA9

0.9824.6

12.5

1.8

1.03

25

8.3

0.6

4.1

0.3

3239OKOTOKS8

0.9724.4

4239OKOTOKS9

0.9924.8

16.5

9.6

0.95

224

16.5

10.4

1.09

46

16.4

8.2

16.4

8.2

3547ENMX54S9

1.0325.7

19.5

1.9

0.97

73

30.0

0

19.5

0.4

5239OKOTOKS10

0.9323.4

9.7

0.98

988

16.4

8.2

16.5

524265ST1

0.9968.3

13.9

5.0

0.94

236HIGH RI8

0.9968.5

-13.8

-4.5

1

241BLACK D8

0.9364.4

13.8

4.5

-13.2

-4.3

4243HARTELL9

0.974.0

0.9

0.70.

9565

30.0

0

0.9

0.6

4252CARSLAND

0.9413.0

23.5

13.6

-30.

00

1.03

32

7.7

3.4

15.6

7.0

3251CARSELA2

0.9613.3

4251CARSELA1

0.9913.7

-0.6

-0.3

30.0

0

1

21.6

13.3

30.0

01

0.6

0.3

0.6

0.3

22.2

13.6H

3247CAVAL_A

1.0013.8

4247CAVAL_B

1.0113.9

15.4

21.3

0.93

18

-30.

00

14.8

28.5

0.93

18

-30.

00

1.4

0.7

16.9

22.0R

2.0

1.0

16.9

29.5R

0.0

0.0R

1

Page 76: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Okotoks 678S and

2017 WP

P1670 POST-CONNECTION - DIAGRAM B-13N-1: 646L OKOTOKS 678S TO FOOTHILLS 237STHU, MAY 26 2016 14:21

Okotoks 678S Substation

High River 65S Upgrades

434L

646L

753L

727L

727L

850L

691L

876L

733L

Bus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate B1.105OV 0.898UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

617FOOTHLL1

1.05253.1

643SC1D

1.06254.4

653SC1B

1.06254.4

544ENMX65S4

1.05252.9

-49.

5

-20.

3

49.6

5.6

-49.

5

-20.

3

49.6

5.6

28.2

-12.5

-28.

2

-0.928.2

-12.5

-28.

2

-0.9

640FOOTHLL2

1.02141.0

77.7

21.2

1.025 77.7

21.2

1.025

239OKOTOKS7

0.98135.1

242HIGH RI7

0.99136.6

-152

.6

-28.

9

155.

4

38.3

253BLACKIE7

1.00137.9

886MAG TAP7

0.99136.1

960HART TAP

0.98135.6

13.4

-16.

3

-13.2

14.1

55.2

-4.3

-54.9

4.4

14.2

2.8

-14.1

-4.4

-54.6

-19.5

54.9

19.6

238BLACK D7

0.98135.3

243HARTELL7

0.98135.6

-13.2

-4.2

13.2

3.7

-0.9

-0.7

0.9

0.7

254GLEICHE7

1.03141.5

252CARSELA7

0.99136.1

3.3-3.0

19.9

-9.9

-10.9

9.9

5.2

-10.0

-5.2

7.4

5251WYNDHAM

0.99136.2

-20.9

-11.7

20.9

11.6

340NAMAKA 7

1.04143.6

-10.8

-23.0

10.9

21.7

247CAVALIER

1.04144.1

259STRATHM7

1.03142.6

315HUSSAR

1.05144.3

30.2

39.3

-30.1

-39.9

-9.6

7.9

9.7

-10.7

SW

-26.

0

SW

-10.0

5247CAV T101

1.05144.4

-30.2

-39.3

1

13.7

-24.0

-13.6

23.0

8.7

240MAGCAN 7

-0.0

23.9

0.0

-24.0

SW

-23.9

0.99136.4

547ENMX54S7

1.01139.6

570ENMX65S7

1.01139.9

-98.6

7.3

98.9

-6.2

152.2

9.0

1.03

75

150.7

8.9

1.03

75

589ENMX26S7

1.01139.6

590ENMX24S7

1.01139.5

87.5

1.8

-87.3

-1.0

116.2

8.0

-116.0

-7.1

-22.8

SW

-0.0

949 1.01139.6

-37.

2

46.3

38.3

-45.

8

207JANET 7

80.0

-20.

3

-79.

1

21.5

136.

3

20.2

-135.9

-18.9

1.02140.2

4242HIGH RI9

1.0325.8

2242HIGH RA9

1.0325.7

28.0

21.0

0.89708

28.1

21.0

0.89708

23.4

14.2 4.5

2.7

4.5

2.7

23.4

14.2

4241BLACK D1

0.9824.5

13.2

4.2

0.98

279

13.1

3.1

4238BLACK D9

1.0325.8

13.2

4.2

1.07

52

13.1

3.1

3252CARSELA9

1.0125.2

12.5

1.7

1.03

25

8.3

0.6

4.1

0.3

3239OKOTOKS8

0.9924.8

4239OKOTOKS9

1.0125.3

16.5

9.5

0.95

224

16.5

10.3

1.09

46

16.4

8.2

16.4

8.2

3547ENMX54S9

1.0325.7

19.5

1.9

0.97

73

30.0

0

19.5

0.4

5239OKOTOKS10

0.9523.8

9.7

0.98

988

16.4

8.2

16.5

524265ST1

1.0471.8

13.8

4.7

0.94

236HIGH RI8

1.0471.9

-13.8

-4.2

1

241BLACK D8

0.9968.1

13.8

4.2

-13.2

-4.2

4243HARTELL9

1.024.2

0.9

0.70.

9565

30.0

0

0.9

0.6

4252CARSLAND

0.9713.3

23.5

13.4

-30.

00

1.03

32

7.7

3.4

15.6

7.0

3251CARSELA2

0.9913.6

4251CARSELA1

1.0114.0

-0.6

-0.3

30.0

0

1

21.6

13.3

30.0

01

0.6

0.3

0.6

0.3

22.2

13.6H

3247CAVAL_A

1.0013.8

4247CAVAL_B

1.0113.9

15.5

17.1

0.93

18

-30.

00

14.8

24.3

0.93

18

-30.

00

1.4

0.7

16.9

17.8R

2.0

1.0

16.9

25.3R

0.0

0.0R

1

Page 77: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Okotoks 678S and

2017 WP

P1670 POST-CONNECTION - DIAGRAM B-14N-1: 753L HIGH RIVER 65S TO BLACKIE 253STHU, MAY 26 2016 14:21

Okotoks 678S Substation

High River 65S Upgrades

434L

646L

753L

727L

727L

850L

691L

876L

733L

Bus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate B1.105OV 0.898UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

617FOOTHLL1

1.05253.0

643SC1D

1.06254.3

653SC1B

1.06254.3

544ENMX65S4

1.05252.9

-49.

6

-20.

6

49.6

5.9

-49.

6

-20.

6

49.6

5.9

28.7

-11.0

-28.

7

-2.428.7

-11.0

-28.

7

-2.4

640FOOTHLL2

1.02140.8

78.3

23.0

1.025 78.3

23.0

1.025

239OKOTOKS7

1.00138.0

242HIGH RI7

1.00137.7

-60.0

-11.8

60.8

12.4

-94.

6

-26.

4

95.7

29.3

253BLACKIE7

1.02140.8

886MAG TAP7

1.00138.1

960HART TAP

0.99136.8

10.6

-22.

9

-10.5

22.6

14.2

2.8

-14.1

-4.4

-10.5

-2.6

10.5

2.2

238BLACK D7

0.99136.5

243HARTELL7

0.99136.8

-13.2

-4.2

13.2

3.7

-0.9

-0.7

0.9

0.7

254GLEICHE7

1.04142.9

252CARSELA7

1.01138.9

5.7-5.6

12.7

5.9

-18.2

-5.7

21.1

-14.9

-20.9

12.7

5251WYNDHAM

1.01139.0

-20.9

-9.5

20.9

9.5

340NAMAKA 7

1.05144.4

-8.2

-15.8

8.2

14.3

247CAVALIER

1.05144.8

259STRATHM7

1.04143.1

315HUSSAR

1.05145.0

30.2

33.8

-30.2

-34.5

-9.6

8.0

9.7

-10.9

SW

-26.

2

SW

-10.1

5247CAV T101

1.05145.0

-30.2

-33.8

1

11.0

-26.0

-10.9

25.1

16.0

240MAGCAN 7

-0.0

24.6

0.0

-24.7

SW

-24.6

1.00138.4

547ENMX54S7

1.01139.6

570ENMX65S7

1.01139.9

-98.6

7.4

98.9

-6.3

151.9

8.6

1.03

75

150.5

8.5

1.03

75

589ENMX26S7

1.01139.6

590ENMX24S7

1.01139.5

87.1

1.3

-86.9

-0.5

116.1

7.9

-115.9

-7.0

-16.0

SW

-0.0

949 1.01139.8

-34.

5

48.6

35.7

-48.

1

207JANET 7

77.3

-22.

7

-76.

4

23.9

137.

2

20.9

-136.8

-19.7

1.02140.2

4242HIGH RI9

1.0426.0

2242HIGH RA9

1.0426.0

28.0

20.9

0.89708

28.1

21.0

0.89708

23.4

14.2 4.5

2.7

4.5

2.7

23.4

14.2

4241BLACK D1

0.9924.8

13.2

4.1

0.98

279

13.1

3.1

4238BLACK D9

1.0426.0

13.2

4.2

1.07

52

13.1

3.1

3252CARSELA9

1.0325.7

12.5

1.7

1.03

25

8.3

0.6

4.1

0.3

3239OKOTOKS8

1.0225.4

4239OKOTOKS9

1.0425.9

16.5

9.5

0.95

224

16.5

10.2

1.09

46

16.4

8.2

16.4

8.2

3547ENMX54S9

1.0325.7

19.5

1.9

0.97

73

30.0

0

19.5

0.4

5239OKOTOKS10

0.9724.3

9.6

0.98

988

16.4

8.2

16.5

524265ST1

1.0572.4

13.8

4.6

0.94

236HIGH RI8

1.0572.5

-13.7

-4.2

1

241BLACK D8

1.0068.7

13.7

4.2

-13.2

-4.1

4243HARTELL9

1.034.3

0.9

0.70.

9565

30.0

0

0.9

0.6

4252CARSLAND

0.9913.7

23.5

13.3

-30.

00

1.03

32

7.7

3.4

15.6

7.0

3251CARSELA2

1.0113.9

4251CARSELA1

1.0314.2

-0.6

-0.3

30.0

0

1

21.6

11.0

30.0

01

0.6

0.3

0.6

0.3

22.2

11.3R

3247CAVAL_A

1.0013.8

4247CAVAL_B

1.0113.9

15.5

14.2

0.93

18

-30.

00

14.8

21.3

0.93

18

-30.

00

1.4

0.7

16.9

14.9R

2.0

1.0

16.9

22.3R

0.0

0.0R

1

Page 78: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Okotoks 678S and

2017 WP

P1670 POST-CONNECTION - DIAGRAM B-15N-1: PCES01L NAMAKA 428S TO CAVALIER POWER PLANTTHU, MAY 26 2016 14:21

Okotoks 678S Substation

High River 65S Upgrades

434L

646L

753L

727L

727L

850L

691L

876L

733L

Bus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate B1.105OV 0.898UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

617FOOTHLL1

1.05251.5

643SC1D

1.05252.9

653SC1B

1.05252.9

544ENMX65S4

1.05251.8

-51.

5

-20.

4

51.6

6.0

-51.

5

-20.

4

51.6

6.0

34.1

-6.7

-34.

1

-6.534.1

-6.7

-34.

1

-6.5

640FOOTHLL2

1.01139.9

85.6

26.9

1.025 85.6

26.9

1.025

239OKOTOKS7

0.99136.4

242HIGH RI7

0.99136.4

-62.7

-15.9

63.5

16.9

-106

.3

-27.

7

107.

7

31.7

253BLACKIE7

0.99136.1

886MAG TAP7

0.99136.7

960HART TAP

0.98135.4

18.9

-7.5

-18.7

5.3

3.4

-14.

4

-3.4

14.0

14.2

2.8

-14.1

-4.4

-3.3

-10.6

3.3

10.2

238BLACK D7

0.98135.2

243HARTELL7

0.98135.4

-13.2

-4.2

13.2

3.7

-0.9

-0.7

0.9

0.7

254GLEICHE7

0.98135.5

252CARSELA7

0.98135.8

20.1-19.9

4.2

1.4

-3.9

-1.4

16.6

-2.9

-16.5

0.4

5251WYNDHAM

0.98135.9

-20.9

-11.7

20.9

11.6

340NAMAKA 7

0.98135.8

6.1

-7.3

-6.1

5.9

247CAVALIER

1.05144.6

259STRATHM7

0.99136.7

315HUSSAR

0.99136.3

-9.6

6.8

9.7

-9.3

SW

-23.

9

SW

-9.0

5247CAV T101

1.05144.9

1

26.9

2.0

-26.7

-2.8

1.7

240MAGCAN 7

-0.0

24.1

0.0

-24.2

SW

-24.1

0.99137.0

547ENMX54S7

1.01138.9

570ENMX65S7

1.01139.1

-98.3

7.3

98.6

-6.2

152.6

11.0

1.03

75

151.1

10.9

1.03

75

589ENMX26S7

1.01138.8

590ENMX24S7

1.00138.7

88.6

5.0

-88.4

-4.1

116.2

8.6

-116.0

-7.6

-6.9

SW

-0.0

949 0.99137.2

-50.

4

18.2

51.4

-17.

9

207JANET 7

93.3 8.4

-92.

2

-6.5

132.

2

12.9

-131.9

-11.7

1.01139.2

4242HIGH RI9

1.0325.7

2242HIGH RA9

1.0325.7

28.0

21.0

0.89708

28.1

21.1

0.89708

23.4

14.2 4.5

2.7

4.5

2.7

23.4

14.2

4241BLACK D1

0.9824.5

13.2

4.2

0.98

279

13.1

3.1

4238BLACK D9

1.0325.7

13.2

4.2

1.07

52

13.1

3.1

3252CARSELA9

1.0125.1

12.5

1.7

1.03

25

8.3

0.6

4.1

0.3

3239OKOTOKS8

1.0025.1

4239OKOTOKS9

1.0225.6

16.5

9.5

0.95

224

16.5

10.3

1.09

46

16.4

8.2

16.4

8.2

3547ENMX54S9

1.0225.6

19.5

1.9

0.97

73

30.0

0

19.5

0.4

5239OKOTOKS10

0.9624.0

9.6

0.98

988

16.4

8.2

16.5

524265ST1

1.0471.7

13.8

4.7

0.94

236HIGH RI8

1.0471.8

-13.8

-4.3

1

241BLACK D8

0.9968.0

13.8

4.3

-13.2

-4.2

4243HARTELL9

1.024.2

0.9

0.70.

9565

30.0

0

0.9

0.6

4252CARSLAND

0.9613.3

23.5

13.5

-30.

00

1.03

32

7.7

3.4

15.6

7.0

3251CARSELA2

0.9813.6

4251CARSELA1

1.0114.0

-0.6

-0.3

30.0

0

1

21.6

13.3

30.0

01

0.6

0.3

0.6

0.3

22.2

13.6H

3247CAVAL_A

1.0013.8

4247CAVAL_B

1.0113.9

0.93

18

-30.

00

0.93

18

-30.

00

1

Page 79: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Okotoks 678S and

2017 WP

P1670 POST-CONNECTION - DIAGRAM B-16N-1: CAVALIER TRANSFORMERTHU, MAY 26 2016 14:21

Okotoks 678S Substation

High River 65S Upgrades

434L

646L

753L

727L

727L

850L

691L

876L

733L

Bus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate B1.105OV 0.898UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

617FOOTHLL1

1.05251.6

643SC1D

1.05253.0

653SC1B

1.05253.0

544ENMX65S4

1.05251.8

-51.

6

-20.

4

51.6

6.0

-51.

6

-20.

4

51.6

6.0

34.1

-6.8

-34.

1

-6.334.1

-6.8

-34.

1

-6.3

640FOOTHLL2

1.01139.9

85.6

26.8

1.025 85.6

26.8

1.025

239OKOTOKS7

0.99136.5

242HIGH RI7

0.99136.5

-62.7

-15.8

63.5

16.8

-106

.3

-27.

5

107.

7

31.6

253BLACKIE7

0.99136.2

886MAG TAP7

0.99136.7

960HART TAP

0.98135.5

18.9

-7.7

-18.7

5.4

3.4

-14.

4

-3.4

14.0

14.2

2.8

-14.1

-4.4

-3.3

-10.6

3.3

10.2

238BLACK D7

0.98135.2

243HARTELL7

0.98135.5

-13.2

-4.2

13.2

3.7

-0.9

-0.7

0.9

0.7

254GLEICHE7

0.98135.6

252CARSELA7

0.98135.9

20.1-19.9

4.5

1.4

-4.0

-1.4

16.6

-3.0

-16.5

0.5

5251WYNDHAM

0.99136.0

-20.9

-11.7

20.9

11.6

340NAMAKA 7

0.99136.0

6.1

-7.6

-6.1

6.1

247CAVALIER

0.99136.0

259STRATHM7

0.99136.8

315HUSSAR

0.99136.5

0.0

0.0

-0.0

-0.7

-9.6

6.8

9.7

-9.3

SW

-23.

9

SW

-9.0

5247CAV T101

1.05144.9

1

26.9

1.4

-26.7

-2.3

1.7

240MAGCAN 7

-0.0

24.1

0.0

-24.2

SW

-24.1

0.99137.0

547ENMX54S7

1.01138.9

570ENMX65S7

1.01139.1

-98.3

7.3

98.6

-6.2

152.6

11.0

1.03

75

151.1

10.9

1.03

75

589ENMX26S7

1.01138.8

590ENMX24S7

1.00138.7

88.6

5.0

-88.4

-4.1

116.2

8.6

-116.0

-7.6

-7.2

SW

-0.0

949 0.99137.2

-50.

4

18.8

51.4

-18.

4

207JANET 7

93.3 7.9

-92.

2

-6.0

132.

2

13.0

-131.9

-11.9

1.01139.2

4242HIGH RI9

1.0325.7

2242HIGH RA9

1.0325.7

28.0

21.0

0.89708

28.1

21.1

0.89708

23.4

14.2 4.5

2.7

4.5

2.7

23.4

14.2

4241BLACK D1

0.9824.5

13.2

4.2

0.98

279

13.1

3.1

4238BLACK D9

1.0325.7

13.2

4.2

1.07

52

13.1

3.1

3252CARSELA9

1.0125.1

12.5

1.7

1.03

25

8.3

0.6

4.1

0.3

3239OKOTOKS8

1.0025.1

4239OKOTOKS9

1.0225.6

16.5

9.5

0.95

224

16.5

10.3

1.09

46

16.4

8.2

16.4

8.2

3547ENMX54S9

1.0225.6

19.5

1.9

0.97

73

30.0

0

19.5

0.4

5239OKOTOKS10

0.9624.1

9.6

0.98

988

16.4

8.2

16.5

524265ST1

1.0471.7

13.8

4.7

0.94

236HIGH RI8

1.0471.8

-13.8

-4.3

1

241BLACK D8

0.9968.0

13.8

4.3

-13.2

-4.2

4243HARTELL9

1.024.2

0.9

0.70.

9565

30.0

0

0.9

0.6

4252CARSLAND

0.9613.3

23.5

13.5

-30.

00

1.03

32

7.7

3.4

15.6

7.0

3251CARSELA2

0.9813.6

4251CARSELA1

1.0114.0

-0.6

-0.3

30.0

0

1

21.6

13.3

30.0

01

0.6

0.3

0.6

0.3

22.2

13.6H

3247CAVAL_A

1.0013.8

4247CAVAL_B

1.0113.9

0.93

18

-30.

00

0.93

18

-30.

00

1

Page 80: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Okotoks 678S and

2017 WP

P1670 POST-CONNECTION - DIAGRAM B-17N-1: 876L BLACKIE 253S TO GLEICHEN 179STHU, MAY 26 2016 14:21

Okotoks 678S Substation

High River 65S Upgrades

434L

646L

753L

727L

727L

850L

691L

876L

733L

Bus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate B1.105OV 0.898UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

617FOOTHLL1

1.05252.5

643SC1D

1.06254.0

653SC1B

1.06254.0

544ENMX65S4

1.05252.7

-49.

1

-21.

3

49.1

6.7

-49.

1

-21.

3

49.1

6.7

26.1

-6.2

-26.

1

-7.226.1

-6.2

-26.

1

-7.2

640FOOTHLL2

1.02140.3

75.2

28.5

1.025 75.2

28.5

1.025

239OKOTOKS7

0.99137.0

242HIGH RI7

0.99136.9

-55.3

-18.0

56.0

18.3

-93.

2

-31.

5

94.4

34.5

253BLACKIE7

0.99136.8

886MAG TAP7

0.99137.2

960HART TAP

0.99135.9

5.7

-3.1

-5.7

0.4

3.6

-14.

9

-3.6

14.5

14.2

2.8

-14.1

-4.4

-3.5

-10.3

3.5

9.9

238BLACK D7

0.98135.7

243HARTELL7

0.99135.9

-13.2

-4.2

13.2

3.7

-0.9

-0.7

0.9

0.7

254GLEICHE7

1.05144.5

252CARSELA7

0.99136.4

-5.6

-1.8

5.7

9.4

-1.1

-9.4

-1.7

5251WYNDHAM

0.99136.5

-20.9

-11.7

20.9

11.6

340NAMAKA 7

1.05145.1

-13.8

-3.0

13.8

1.4

247CAVALIER

1.05145.5

259STRATHM7

1.04143.7

315HUSSAR

1.06145.8

30.2

27.7

-30.2

-28.4

-9.6

8.1

9.7

-11.0

SW

-26.

4

SW

-10.2

5247CAV T101

1.06145.7

-30.2

-27.7

1

16.7

-32.8

-16.5

32.1

-0.4

240MAGCAN 7

0.0

24.3

0.0

-24.4

SW

-24.3

1.00137.5

547ENMX54S7

1.01139.6

570ENMX65S7

1.01139.8

-98.7

7.7

99.0

-6.6

152.6

7.8

1.03

75

151.1

7.7

1.03

75

589ENMX26S7

1.01139.5

590ENMX24S7

1.01139.5

88.1

0.1

-87.9

0.7

116.4

7.5

-116.2

-6.6

SW

-0.0

949 1.01139.9

-40.

2

55.6

41.7

-54.

3

207JANET 7

83.5

-28.

5

-82.

4

30.0

135.

4

23.0

-135.0

-21.8

1.02140.2

4242HIGH RI9

1.0325.9

2242HIGH RA9

1.0325.8

28.0

21.0

0.89708

28.1

21.0

0.89708

23.4

14.2 4.5

2.7

4.5

2.7

23.4

14.2

4241BLACK D1

0.9824.6

13.2

4.1

0.98

279

13.1

3.1

4238BLACK D9

1.0325.8

13.2

4.2

1.07

52

13.1

3.1

3252CARSELA9

1.0125.2

12.5

1.7

1.03

25

8.3

0.6

4.1

0.3

3239OKOTOKS8

1.0125.2

4239OKOTOKS9

1.0325.7

16.5

9.5

0.95

224

16.5

10.3

1.09

46

16.4

8.2

16.4

8.2

3547ENMX54S9

1.0325.7

19.5

1.9

0.97

73

30.0

0

19.5

0.4

5239OKOTOKS10

0.9724.1

9.6

0.98

988

16.4

8.2

16.5

524265ST1

1.0471.9

13.8

4.7

0.94

236HIGH RI8

1.0472.1

-13.8

-4.2

1

241BLACK D8

0.9968.3

13.8

4.2

-13.2

-4.1

4243HARTELL9

1.024.3

0.9

0.70.

9565

30.0

0

0.9

0.6

4252CARSLAND

0.9713.4

23.5

13.4

-30.

00

1.03

32

7.7

3.4

15.6

7.0

3251CARSELA2

0.9913.6

4251CARSELA1

1.0214.0

-0.6

-0.3

30.0

0

1

21.6

13.3

30.0

01

0.6

0.3

0.6

0.3

22.2

13.6H

3247CAVAL_A

1.0013.8

4247CAVAL_B

1.0113.9

15.4

11.0

0.93

18

-30.

00

14.8

18.1

0.93

18

-30.

00

1.4

0.7

16.9

11.7R

2.0

1.0

16.9

19.1R

0.0

0.0R

1

Page 81: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Okotoks 678S and

2017 WP

P1670 POST-CONNECTION - DIAGRAM B-18N-1: 733L NAMAKA 428S TO GLEICHEN 179STHU, MAY 26 2016 14:23

Okotoks 678S Substation

High River 65S Upgrades

434L

646L

753L

727L

727L

850L

691L

876L

733L

Bus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate B1.105OV 0.898UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

617FOOTHLL1

1.05252.3

643SC1D

1.06253.8

653SC1B

1.06253.8

544ENMX65S4

1.05252.6

-50.

1

-21.

4

50.2

6.8

-50.

1

-21.

4

50.2

6.8

32.3

-4.7

-32.

3

-8.632.3

-4.7

-32.

3

-8.6

640FOOTHLL2

1.02140.2

82.4

29.9

1.025 82.4

29.9

1.025

239OKOTOKS7

0.99136.6

242HIGH RI7

0.99136.5

-60.4

-18.3

61.2

19.2

-102

.2

-32.

0

103.

5

35.8

253BLACKIE7

0.98135.8

886MAG TAP7

0.99136.8

960HART TAP

0.98135.6

14.8

-2.9

-14.7

0.5

3.4

-14.

6

-3.4

14.2

14.2

2.8

-14.1

-4.4

-3.3

-10.5

3.4

10.0

238BLACK D7

0.98135.3

243HARTELL7

0.98135.6

-13.2

-4.2

13.2

3.7

-0.9

-0.7

0.9

0.7

254GLEICHE7

0.97134.4

252CARSELA7

0.98135.7

13.9-13.8

-3.1

-0.8

-1.6

0.8

14.3

-0.6

-14.2

-1.9

5251WYNDHAM

0.98135.8

-20.9

-11.7

20.9

11.6

340NAMAKA 7

1.06145.8

247CAVALIER

1.06146.1

259STRATHM7

1.04144.2

315HUSSAR

1.06146.5

30.2

22.6

-30.2

-23.4

-9.6

8.2

9.7

-11.1

SW

-26.

6

SW

-10.3

5247CAV T101

1.06146.3

-30.2

-22.6

1

2.8

-29.5

-2.6

28.5

-0.7

240MAGCAN 7

-0.0

24.1

0.0

-24.3

SW

-24.1

0.99137.1

547ENMX54S7

1.01139.5

570ENMX65S7

1.01139.8

-98.3

7.7

98.6

-6.6

150.8

7.6

1.03

75

149.4

7.5

1.03

75

589ENMX26S7

1.01139.5

590ENMX24S7

1.01139.4

85.6

0.2

-85.4

0.6

115.7

7.5

-115.5

-6.6

0.1

SW

-0.0

949 1.02140.1

-26.

3

52.4

27.4

-52.

1

207JANET 7

68.8

-27.

0

-68.

1

27.8

140.

0

22.6

-139.5

-21.2

1.02140.2

4242HIGH RI9

1.0325.8

2242HIGH RA9

1.0325.7

28.0

21.0

0.89708

28.1

21.0

0.89708

23.4

14.2 4.5

2.7

4.5

2.7

23.4

14.2

4241BLACK D1

0.9824.5

13.2

4.2

0.98

279

13.1

3.1

4238BLACK D9

1.0325.8

13.2

4.2

1.07

52

13.1

3.1

3252CARSELA9

1.0025.1

12.5

1.7

1.03

25

8.3

0.6

4.1

0.3

3239OKOTOKS8

1.0025.1

4239OKOTOKS9

1.0225.6

16.5

9.5

0.95

224

16.5

10.3

1.09

46

16.4

8.2

16.4

8.2

3547ENMX54S9

1.0325.7

19.5

1.9

0.97

73

30.0

0

19.5

0.4

5239OKOTOKS10

0.9624.1

9.6

0.98

988

16.4

8.2

16.5

524265ST1

1.0471.7

13.8

4.7

0.94

236HIGH RI8

1.0471.9

-13.8

-4.2

1

241BLACK D8

0.9968.1

13.8

4.2

-13.2

-4.2

4243HARTELL9

1.024.2

0.9

0.70.

9565

30.0

0

0.9

0.6

4252CARSLAND

0.9613.3

23.5

13.5

-30.

00

1.03

32

7.7

3.4

15.6

7.0

3251CARSELA2

0.9813.6

4251CARSELA1

1.0114.0

-0.6

-0.3

30.0

0

1

21.6

13.3

30.0

01

0.6

0.3

0.6

0.3

22.2

13.6H

3247CAVAL_A

1.0013.8

4247CAVAL_B

1.0113.9

15.4

8.4

0.93

18

-30.

00

14.8

15.4

0.93

18

-30.

00

1.4

0.7

16.9

9.1R

2.0

1.0

16.9

16.4R

0.0

0.0R

1

Page 82: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Okotoks 678S and

2017 SP

P1670 POST-CONNECTION - DIAGRAM B-19N-1: 691L JANET 74S TO CHESTERMERE 419STUE, MAY 31 2016 8:36

Okotoks 678S Substation

High River 65S Upgrades

434L

646L

753L

727L

727L

850L

691L

876L

733L

Bus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate A1.105OV 0.898UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

617FOOTHLL1

1.06253.3

643SC1D

1.06253.3

653SC1B

1.06253.3

544ENMX65S4

1.06253.5

-48.

9

-3.4

49.0

-11.3

-48.

9

-3.4

49.0

-11.

352.8

-8.8

-52.

7

-4.152.8

-8.8

-52.

7

-4.1

640FOOTHLL2

1.04143.5

101.

6

7.5

1.0125 101.

6

7.5

1.0125

239OKOTOKS7

1.02141.2

242HIGH RI7

1.03141.5

-74.7

-2.5

75.7

4.2

-125

.7 0.8

127.

4

4.3

253BLACKIE7

1.03142.2

886MAG TAP7

1.03141.6

960HART TAP

1.02140.8

42.5

-24.

5

-41.4

24.0

6.7

-9.6

-6.7

9.1

10.6

1.8

-10.6

-3.6

-6.6

-17.3

6.7

16.9

238BLACK D7

1.02140.6

243HARTELL7

1.02140.8

-9.6

-3.4

9.7

2.9

-0.9

-0.7

0.9

0.7

254GLEICHE7

1.05145.1

252CARSELA7

1.02140.8

51.2-49.0

39.4

9.9

-16.5

-9.8

31.9

-9.3

-31.5

7.4

5251WYNDHAM

1.02140.9

-13.9

-8.9

13.9

8.8

340NAMAKA 7

1.07147.2

36.3

-43.9

-35.5

43.8

247CAVALIER

1.07147.6

259STRATHM7

1.07148.0

315HUSSAR

1.06145.8

24.9

29.7

-24.9

-30.5

-18.1

-4.1

18.2

1.2

SW

-28.

0

SW

-10.2

5247CAV T101

1.07147.8

-24.9

-29.7

1

-20.9

23.1

21.1

-24.0

14.3

240MAGCAN 7

0.0

25.9

0.0

-26.0

SW

-25.9

1.03141.9

547ENMX54S7

1.01139.8

570ENMX65S7

1.02140.2

-93.2

3.0

93.5

-2.1

139.2

9.6

1.03

75

137.9

9.4

1.03

75

589ENMX26S7

1.01139.8

590ENMX24S7

1.01139.9

75.2

-1.8

-75.0

2.2

108.1

11.0

-108.0

-10.3

-38.2

SW

-0.0

949 1.07148.1

0.0

-2.2

-0.0

0.0

207JANET 7

157.

3

12.7

-156.8

-10.9

SW

-152

.2

1.02140.5

4242HIGH RI9

1.0526.3

2242HIGH RA9

1.0526.2

28.0

14.0

0.93249

28.0

14.1

0.93249

23.4 9.0

4.5

1.7

4.5

1.7

23.4

9.0

4241BLACK D1

1.0425.9

9.6

3.4

0.94

007

999.6

2.8

4238BLACK D9

1.0626.4

9.6

3.4

1.05

58

999.6

2.8

3252CARSELA9

1.0325.8

11.9

4.4

1.03

25

317.9

2.4

993.9

1.2

3239OKOTOKS8

1.0325.7

4239OKOTOKS9

1.0426.1

16.5

9.4

0.96

477

16.5

10.1

1.07

52

16.4

8.2

9916.4

8.2

3547ENMX54S9

1.0325.8

17.2

6.9

0.95

853

30.0

0

9917.1

5.6

G1 G2 G3 G4 G5

5239OKOTOKS10

1.0426.0

9.4

0.95

371

16.4

8.299

16.5

524265ST1

1.0672.9

10.0

3.4

0.9625

236HIGH RI8

1.0371.1

-10.0

-3.1

0.97

5

241BLACK D8

0.9968.3

10.0

3.1

-9.6

-3.4

4243HARTELL9

1.064.4

0.9

0.70.

9565

2

30.0

0

990.9

0.6

4252CARSLAND

1.0214.1

23.7

13.6

-30.

00

1.05

26

317.8

3.5

9915.7

7.2

3251CARSELA2

1.0214.1

4251CARSELA1

1.0414.4

-0.6

-0.3

30.0

0

1

14.6

9.9

30.0

01

370.6

0.3

2

370.6

0.3

115.2

10.2R

3247CAVAL_A

1.0214.1

4247CAVAL_B

1.0214.1

12.8

15.5

0.93

176

-30.

00

12.1

15.4

0.93

176

-30.

00

371.3

0.7

114.1

16.2R

372.0

1.02

14.1

16.4R

30.0

0.0R

1

Page 83: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Okotoks 678S and

2017 SP

P1670 POST-CONNECTION - DIAGRAM B-20N-1: 434L FOOTHILLS 237S TO HIGH RIVER 65STUE, MAY 31 2016 9:11

Okotoks 678S Substation

High River 65S Upgrades

434L

646L

753L

727L

727L

850L

691L

876L

733L

Bus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate A1.105OV 0.898UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

617FOOTHLL1

1.05252.8

643SC1D

1.05253.0

653SC1B

1.05253.0

544ENMX65S4

1.06253.3

-44.

7

-5.8

44.7

-9.0

-44.

7

-5.8

44.7

-9.0

27.5

-1.3

-27.

5

-12.

1

27.5

-1.3

-27.

5

-12.

1

640FOOTHLL2

1.03142.7

72.2

17.9

1.0125 72.2

17.9

1.0125

239OKOTOKS7

0.99136.3

242HIGH RI7

0.97134.4

-140.3

-19.2

144.

3

32.4

253BLACKIE7

0.99137.0

886MAG TAP7

0.98135.6

960HART TAP

0.97133.7

-6.1

-16.

4

6.2

14.1

-70.

6

-18.

1

71.0

18.6

10.6

2.1

-10.6

-3.7

71.4

-4.8

-71.0

5.3

238BLACK D7

0.97133.5

243HARTELL7

0.97133.7

-9.6

-3.5

9.7

3.0

-0.9

-0.7

0.9

0.7

254GLEICHE7

1.02141.2

252CARSELA7

0.98135.9

-8.68.8

18.1

-2.3

-9.1

2.4

19.4

-5.3

-19.3

3.0

5251WYNDHAM

0.99136.0

-13.9

-12.2

13.9

12.1

340NAMAKA 7

1.04143.7

-21.6

-22.5

21.8

21.4

247CAVALIER

1.05144.4

259STRATHM7

1.04143.3

315HUSSAR

1.03142.2

24.9

56.4

-24.8

-57.0

-18.1

-4.7

18.2

2.0

SW

-26.

3

SW

-9.7

5247CAV T101

1.05144.8

-24.9

-56.4

1

36.7

-24.5

-36.4

24.0

6.8

240MAGCAN 7

0.0

23.7

0.0

-23.8

SW

-23.7

0.98135.9

547ENMX54S7

1.01139.9

570ENMX65S7

1.02140.2

-94.8

3.7

95.0

-2.8

146.3

6.1

1.03

75

144.9

6.0

1.03

75

589ENMX26S7

1.01139.9

590ENMX24S7

1.02140.1

85.2

-7.9

-85.0

8.6

110.7

9.6

-110.6

-8.8

-20.9

SW

-0.0

949 1.03141.6

-57.

6

43.5

59.2

-41.

9

207JANET 7

59.9

-41.

2

-59.

2

41.9

139.

6

25.2

-139.2

-23.9

SW

-152

.9

1.02140.9

4242HIGH RI9

0.9924.9

2242HIGH RA9

0.9924.8

28.0

14.4

0.93249

28.0

14.4

0.93249

23.4 9.0

4.5

1.7

4.5

1.7

23.4

9.0

4241BLACK D1

0.9724.4

9.6

3.4

0.94

007

999.6

2.8

4238BLACK D9

1.0025.0

9.6

3.5

1.05

58

999.6

2.8

3252CARSELA9

0.9924.8

11.9

4.4

1.03

25

317.9

2.4

993.9

1.2

3239OKOTOKS8

0.9924.7

4239OKOTOKS9

1.0025.1

16.5

9.5

0.96

477

16.5

10.3

1.07

52

16.4

8.2

9916.4

8.2

3547ENMX54S9

1.0325.8

17.2

6.9

0.95

853

30.0

0

9917.1

5.6

G1 G2 G3 G4 G5

5239OKOTOKS10

1.0025.0

9.5

0.95

371

16.4

8.299

16.5

524265ST1

1.0069.1

10.0

3.5

0.9625

236HIGH RI8

0.9867.5

-10.0

-3.3

0.97

5

241BLACK D8

0.9364.5

10.0

3.3

-9.6

-3.4

4243HARTELL9

1.014.2

0.9

0.70.

9565

2

30.0

0

990.9

0.6

4252CARSLAND

0.9813.5

23.7

13.8

-30.

00

1.05

26

317.8

3.5

9915.7

7.2

3251CARSELA2

0.9813.6

4251CARSELA1

1.0114.0

-0.6

-0.3

30.0

0

1

14.6

13.3

30.0

01

370.6

0.3

2

370.6

0.3

115.2

13.6H

3247CAVAL_A

1.0214.1

4247CAVAL_B

1.0214.1

12.9

29.8

0.93

176

-30.

00

12.1

29.7

0.93

176

-30.

00

371.3

0.7

114.1

30.5R

372.0

1.02

14.1

30.7R

30.0

0.0R

1

Page 84: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Okotoks 678S and

2017 SP

P1670 POST-CONNECTION - DIAGRAM B-21N-1: PCES01L NAMAKA 428S TO CAVALIER POWER PLANTTUE, MAY 31 2016 10:23

Okotoks 678S Substation

High River 65S Upgrades

434L

646L

753L

727L

727L

850L

691L

876L

733L

Bus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate A1.105OV 0.898UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

617FOOTHLL1

1.05251.6

643SC1D

1.05252.0

653SC1B

1.05252.0

544ENMX65S4

1.05252.3

-47.

1

-8.8

47.1

-5.8

-47.

1

-8.8

47.1

-5.8

37.2

1.3

-37.

1

-14.

4

37.2

1.3

-37.

1

-14.

4

640FOOTHLL2

1.03141.8

84.2

23.2

1.0125 84.2

23.2

1.0125

239OKOTOKS7

1.00138.6

242HIGH RI7

1.01138.8

-62.4

-15.0

63.2

15.8

-103

.9

-22.

3

105.

2

25.8

253BLACKIE7

1.00137.5

886MAG TAP7

1.01139.0

960HART TAP

1.00138.1

20.5

-0.9

-20.3

-1.4

6.8

-10.

5

-6.8

10.1

10.6

1.9

-10.6

-3.6

-6.7

-15.3

6.8

14.9

238BLACK D7

1.00137.9

243HARTELL7

1.00138.1

-9.6

-3.4

9.7

2.9

-0.9

-0.7

0.9

0.7

254GLEICHE7

0.98135.5

252CARSELA7

0.99137.2

18.3-18.1

-4.1

-2.0

-2.4

2.0

19.7

1.1

-19.6

-3.6

5251WYNDHAM

0.99137.3

-13.9

-12.2

13.9

12.1

340NAMAKA 7

0.98135.3

5.3

-0.4

-5.3

-1.1

247CAVALIER

1.05144.7

259STRATHM7

0.99137.0

315HUSSAR

0.97133.3

-18.1

-6.1

18.3

3.8

SW

-24.

0

SW

-8.6

5247CAV T101

1.05145.1

1

34.3

11.9

-34.1

-12.4

0.1

240MAGCAN 7

-0.0

24.9

0.0

-25.0

SW

-24.9

1.01139.2

547ENMX54S7

1.01139.2

570ENMX65S7

1.01139.5

-94.2

3.4

94.5

-2.5

145.1

9.1

1.03

75

143.7

9.0

1.03

75

589ENMX26S7

1.01139.2

590ENMX24S7

1.01139.3

83.9

-3.1

-83.7

3.8

110.2

10.6

-110.0

-9.8

1.3

SW

-0.0

949 1.01139.1

-55.

2

4.8

56.3

-4.4

207JANET 7

56.7

-4.2

-56.

3

4.4

140.

2

15.3

-139.8

-14.0

SW

-150

.8

1.01139.9

4242HIGH RI9

1.0325.8

2242HIGH RA9

1.0325.7

28.0

14.2

0.93249

28.0

14.2

0.93249

23.4 9.0

4.5

1.7

4.5

1.7

23.4

9.0

4241BLACK D1

1.0125.3

9.6

3.4

0.94

007

999.6

2.8

4238BLACK D9

1.0425.9

9.6

3.4

1.05

58

999.6

2.8

3252CARSELA9

1.0025.1

11.9

4.4

1.03

25

317.9

2.4

993.9

1.2

3239OKOTOKS8

1.0125.1

4239OKOTOKS9

1.0225.6

16.5

9.5

0.96

477

16.5

10.2

1.07

52

16.4

8.2

9916.4

8.2

3547ENMX54S9

1.0325.6

17.2

6.9

0.95

853

30.0

0

9917.1

5.6

G1 G2 G3 G4 G5

5239OKOTOKS10

1.0225.5

9.5

0.95

371

16.4

8.299

16.5

524265ST1

1.0471.4

10.0

3.4

0.9625

236HIGH RI8

1.0169.7

-10.0

-3.2

0.97

5

241BLACK D8

0.9766.9

10.0

3.2

-9.6

-3.4

4243HARTELL9

1.044.3

0.9

0.70.

9565

2

30.0

0

990.9

0.6

4252CARSLAND

0.9913.7

23.7

13.8

-30.

00

1.05

26

317.8

3.5

9915.7

7.2

3251CARSELA2

0.9913.7

4251CARSELA1

1.0214.1

-0.6

-0.3

30.0

0

1

14.6

13.3

30.0

01

370.6

0.3

2

370.6

0.3

115.2

13.6H

3247CAVAL_A

1.0214.1

4247CAVAL_B

1.0214.1

0.93

176

-30.

00

0.93

176

-30.

00

37

1

37 2

3

1

Page 85: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Okotoks 678S and

2017 SP

P1670 POST-CONNECTION - DIAGRAM B-22N-1: CAVALIER 138/13.8 KV TRANSFORMERTUE, MAY 31 2016 10:24

Okotoks 678S Substation

High River 65S Upgrades

434L

646L

753L

727L

727L

850L

691L

876L

733L

Bus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate A1.105OV 0.898UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

617FOOTHLL1

1.05251.6

643SC1D

1.05252.0

653SC1B

1.05252.0

544ENMX65S4

1.05252.3

-47.

1

-8.7

47.1

-5.8

-47.

1

-8.7

47.1

-5.8

37.2

1.2

-37.

1

-14.

3

37.2

1.2

-37.

1

-14.

3

640FOOTHLL2

1.03141.8

84.2

23.0

1.0125 84.2

23.0

1.0125

239OKOTOKS7

1.00138.6

242HIGH RI7

1.01138.8

-62.4

-14.9

63.2

15.7

-103

.9

-22.

1

105.

2

25.6

253BLACKIE7

1.00137.5

886MAG TAP7

1.01139.0

960HART TAP

1.00138.1

20.5

-1.1

-20.3

-1.2

6.8

-10.

5

-6.8

10.1

10.6

1.9

-10.6

-3.6

-6.7

-15.3

6.8

14.9

238BLACK D7

1.00137.9

243HARTELL7

1.00138.1

-9.6

-3.4

9.7

2.9

-0.9

-0.7

0.9

0.7

254GLEICHE7

0.98135.6

252CARSELA7

0.99137.3

18.3-18.1

-3.9

-2.0

-2.5

2.0

19.7

1.0

-19.6

-3.5

5251WYNDHAM

1.00137.3

-13.9

-12.2

13.9

12.1

340NAMAKA 7

0.98135.4

5.3

-0.7

-5.3

-0.8

247CAVALIER

0.98135.4

259STRATHM7

0.99137.1

315HUSSAR

0.97133.5

0.0

0.0

0.0

-0.7

-18.1

-6.1

18.3

3.8

SW

-24.

0

SW

-8.6

5247CAV T101

1.05145.1

1

34.3

11.4

-34.1

-11.9

0.2

240MAGCAN 7

-0.0

24.9

0.0

-25.1

SW

-24.9

1.01139.3

547ENMX54S7

1.01139.2

570ENMX65S7

1.01139.5

-94.2

3.4

94.5

-2.5

145.1

9.1

1.03

75

143.7

9.0

1.03

75

589ENMX26S7

1.01139.2

590ENMX24S7

1.01139.3

83.9

-3.2

-83.7

3.9

110.2

10.6

-110.0

-9.8

1.0

SW

-0.0

949 1.01139.1

-55.

2

5.3

56.3

-4.9

207JANET 7

56.7

-4.7

-56.

3

4.9

140.

2

15.5

-139.8

-14.1

SW

-150

.9

1.01139.9

4242HIGH RI9

1.0325.8

2242HIGH RA9

1.0325.7

28.0

14.2

0.93249

28.0

14.2

0.93249

23.4 9.0

4.5

1.7

4.5

1.7

23.4

9.0

4241BLACK D1

1.0125.3

9.6

3.4

0.94

007

999.6

2.8

4238BLACK D9

1.0425.9

9.6

3.4

1.05

58

999.6

2.8

3252CARSELA9

1.0025.1

11.9

4.4

1.03

25

317.9

2.4

993.9

1.2

3239OKOTOKS8

1.0125.1

4239OKOTOKS9

1.0225.6

16.5

9.5

0.96

477

16.5

10.2

1.07

52

16.4

8.2

9916.4

8.2

3547ENMX54S9

1.0325.6

17.2

6.9

0.95

853

30.0

0

9917.1

5.6

G1 G2 G3 G4 G5

5239OKOTOKS10

1.0225.5

9.5

0.95

371

16.4

8.299

16.5

524265ST1

1.0471.4

10.0

3.4

0.9625

236HIGH RI8

1.0169.8

-10.0

-3.2

0.97

5

241BLACK D8

0.9766.9

10.0

3.2

-9.6

-3.4

4243HARTELL9

1.044.3

0.9

0.70.

9565

2

30.0

0

990.9

0.6

4252CARSLAND

0.9913.7

23.7

13.8

-30.

00

1.05

26

317.8

3.5

9915.7

7.2

3251CARSELA2

0.9913.7

4251CARSELA1

1.0214.1

-0.6

-0.3

30.0

0

1

14.6

13.3

30.0

01

370.6

0.3

2

370.6

0.3

115.2

13.6H

3247CAVAL_A

1.0214.1

4247CAVAL_B

1.0214.1

0.93

176

-30.

00

0.93

176

-30.

00

37

1

37 2

3

1

Page 86: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Okotoks 678S and

2017 SP

P1670 POST-CONNECTION - DIAGRAM B-23N-1: 876S BLACKIE 253S TO GLEICHEN 179STUE, MAY 31 2016 9:30

Okotoks 678S Substation

High River 65S Upgrades

434L

646L

753L

727L

727L

850L

691L

876L

733L

Bus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate A1.105OV 0.898UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

617FOOTHLL1

1.05252.7

643SC1D

1.05252.9

653SC1B

1.05252.9

544ENMX65S4

1.06253.4

-44.

9

-6.2

45.0

-8.5

-44.

9

-6.2

45.0

-8.5

29.8

0.8

-29.

8

-14.

2

29.8

0.8

-29.

8

-14.

2

640FOOTHLL2

1.03142.6

74.8

20.4

1.0125 74.8

20.4

1.0125

239OKOTOKS7

1.01139.7

242HIGH RI7

1.01139.9

-55.8

-13.9

56.4

14.1

-92.

1

-20.

6

93.0

23.0

253BLACKIE7

1.01139.4

886MAG TAP7

1.01140.1

960HART TAP

1.01139.2

8.4

-1.9

-8.4

-0.8

7.1

-11.

0

-7.0

10.6

10.6

1.9

-10.6

-3.6

-7.0

-15.2

7.0

14.8

238BLACK D7

1.01139.0

243HARTELL7

1.01139.2

-9.6

-3.4

9.7

2.9

-0.9

-0.7

0.9

0.7

254GLEICHE7

1.05145.0

252CARSELA7

1.01138.8

-8.3

-3.1

8.4

13.3

0.1

-13.3

-2.8

5251WYNDHAM

1.01138.8

-13.9

-12.2

13.9

12.1

340NAMAKA 7

1.06145.7

-12.8

-4.4

12.8

2.8

247CAVALIER

1.06146.2

259STRATHM7

1.05144.7

315HUSSAR

1.04144.2

24.9

41.6

-24.9

-42.3

-18.1

-4.3

18.2

1.6

SW

-26.

8

SW

-10.0

5247CAV T101

1.06146.5

-24.9

-41.6

1

27.6

-29.1

-27.3

28.4

0.8

240MAGCAN 7

-0.0

25.3

0.0

-25.4

SW

-25.3

1.02140.3

547ENMX54S7

1.01139.9

570ENMX65S7

1.02140.3

-94.6

3.8

94.9

-2.9

145.3

5.3

1.03

75

143.9

5.3

1.03

75

589ENMX26S7

1.01140.0

590ENMX24S7

1.02140.2

83.7

-8.8

-83.5

9.5

110.4

9.4

-110.2

-8.6

SW

-0.0

949 1.03142.1

-48.

5

48.6

49.9

-47.

4

207JANET 7

50.5

-46.

9

-49.

9

47.4

142.

5

26.8

-142.1

-25.4

SW

-153

.1

1.02141.0

4242HIGH RI9

1.0426.0

2242HIGH RA9

1.0425.9

28.0

14.1

0.93249

28.0

14.1

0.93249

23.4 9.0

4.5

1.7

4.5

1.7

23.4

9.0

4241BLACK D1

1.0225.5

9.6

3.4

0.94

007

999.6

2.8

4238BLACK D9

1.0426.1

9.6

3.4

1.05

58

999.6

2.8

3252CARSELA9

1.0225.4

11.9

4.4

1.03

25

317.9

2.4

993.9

1.2

3239OKOTOKS8

1.0125.4

4239OKOTOKS9

1.0325.8

16.5

9.5

0.96

477

16.5

10.2

1.07

52

16.4

8.2

9916.4

8.2

3547ENMX54S9

1.0325.8

17.2

6.9

0.95

853

30.0

0

9917.1

5.6

G1 G2 G3 G4 G5

5239OKOTOKS10

1.0325.7

9.4

0.95

371

16.4

8.299

16.5

524265ST1

1.0472.0

10.0

3.4

0.9625

236HIGH RI8

1.0270.3

-10.0

-3.2

0.97

5

241BLACK D8

0.9867.4

10.0

3.2

-9.6

-3.4

4243HARTELL9

1.054.4

0.9

0.70.

9565

2

30.0

0

990.9

0.6

4252CARSLAND

1.0113.9

23.7

13.7

-30.

00

1.05

26

317.8

3.5

9915.7

7.2

3251CARSELA2

1.0113.9

4251CARSELA1

1.0314.3

-0.6

-0.3

30.0

0

1

14.6

13.3

30.0

01

370.6

0.3

2

370.6

0.3

115.2

13.6H

3247CAVAL_A

1.0214.1

4247CAVAL_B

1.0214.1

12.8

21.8

0.93

176

-30.

00

12.1

21.7

0.93

176

-30.

00

371.3

0.7

114.1

22.5R

372.0

1.02

14.1

22.7R

30.0

0.0R

1

Page 87: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Okotoks 678S and

2017 WP

P1670 POST-CONNECTION - DIAGRAM B-24N-1: 691L JANET 74S TO CHESTERMERE 419STUE, MAY 31 2016 10:28

Okotoks 678S Substation

High River 65S Upgrades

434L

646L

753L

727L

727L

850L

691L

876L

733L

Bus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate B1.105OV 0.898UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

617FOOTHLL1

1.06254.2

643SC1D

1.06255.5

653SC1B

1.06255.5

544ENMX65S4

1.06253.7

-51.

2

-19.

8

51.3

5.0

-51.

2

-19.

8

51.3

5.0

46.3

-19.8

-46.

2

6.6

46.3

-19.8

-46.

2

6.6

640FOOTHLL2

1.03142.0

97.5

13.2

1.025 97.5

13.2

1.025

239OKOTOKS7

1.01139.4

242HIGH RI7

1.01139.5

-71.1

-5.5

72.0

7.0

-121

.2

-8.3

122.

8

13.2

253BLACKIE7

1.02141.1

886MAG TAP7

1.01139.7

960HART TAP

1.00138.5

33.9

-27.

1

-33.1

26.2

3.4

-13.

5

-3.4

13.1

14.2

2.7

-14.1

-4.4

-3.3

-12.7

3.3

12.3

238BLACK D7

1.00138.2

243HARTELL7

1.00138.5

-13.2

-4.1

13.2

3.7

-0.9

-0.7

0.9

0.7

254GLEICHE7

1.05145.0

252CARSELA7

1.01139.6

42.6-40.8

41.1

9.7

-16.6

-9.6

25.0

-11.0

-24.7

8.8

5251WYNDHAM

1.01139.7

-20.9

-7.2

20.9

7.1

340NAMAKA 7

1.07147.4

27.0

-44.1

-26.3

43.8

247CAVALIER

1.07147.6

259STRATHM7

1.08148.4

315HUSSAR

1.07148.1

30.2

9.8

-30.2

-10.6

-9.6

8.4

9.7

-11.4

SW

-28.

1

SW

-10.6

5247CAV T101

1.07147.7

-30.2

-9.8

1

-23.5

26.9

23.7

-27.7

14.5

240MAGCAN 7

-0.0

25.2

0.0

-25.3

SW

-25.2

1.01140.0

547ENMX54S7

1.01139.9

570ENMX65S7

1.02140.2

-97.4

6.9

97.7

-5.9

144.3

10.5

1.03

75

142.9

10.4

1.03

75

589ENMX26S7

1.01139.9

590ENMX24S7

1.01139.8

75.7

5.1

-75.5

-4.7

113.6

8.8

-113.4

-7.9

-40.6

SW

-0.0

949 1.08148.5

0.0

-2.3

-0.0

0.0

207JANET 7

159.

8

13.2

-159.3

-11.3

1.02140.4

4242HIGH RI9

1.0626.4

2242HIGH RA9

1.0526.3

28.0

20.8

0.89708

28.1

20.9

0.89708

23.4

14.2 4.5

2.7

4.5

2.7

23.4

14.2

4241BLACK D1

1.0125.2

13.2

4.1

0.98

279

13.1

3.1

4238BLACK D9

1.0526.4

13.2

4.1

1.07

52

13.1

3.1

3252CARSELA9

1.0325.9

12.5

1.7

1.03

25

8.3

0.6

4.1

0.3

3239OKOTOKS8

1.0325.7

4239OKOTOKS9

1.0526.2

16.5

9.4

0.95

224

16.5

10.2

1.09

46

16.4

8.2

16.4

8.2

3547ENMX54S9

1.0325.8

19.5

1.9

0.97

73

30.0

0

19.5

0.4

5239OKOTOKS10

0.9824.6

9.6

0.98

988

16.4

8.2

16.5

524265ST1

1.0673.3

13.7

4.5

0.94

236HIGH RI8

1.0673.5

-13.7

-4.1

1

241BLACK D8

1.0169.8

13.7

4.1

-13.2

-4.1

4243HARTELL9

1.044.3

0.9

0.70.

9565

30.0

0

0.9

0.6

4252CARSLAND

0.9913.7

23.4

13.3

-30.

00

1.03

32

7.7

3.4

15.6

7.0

3251CARSELA2

1.0114.0

4251CARSELA1

1.0314.2

-0.6

-0.3

30.0

0

1

21.6

8.6

30.0

01

0.6

0.3

0.6

0.3

22.2

8.9R

3247CAVAL_A

1.0013.8

4247CAVAL_B

1.0113.9

15.4

1.8

0.93

18

-30.

00

14.8

8.9

0.93

18

-30.

00

1.4

0.7

16.9

2.5R

2.0

1.0

16.9

9.9R

0.0

0.0R

1

Page 88: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades

Transmission Project Delivery

R[x] 38

Public R2-2016-07-27

Attachment C

Post-Project Voltage Stability Diagrams (Scenarios 4)

Page 89: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

Table 1: Scenario 4: 2017 WP– Voltage stability analysis results (Minimum transfer = 14.135 MW)

Contingency From To Maximum incremental transfer (MW)

Meets 105% transfer criteria?

N-G System Normal 170 Yes 691L Janet 74S Chestermere 419S 40 Yes 434L High River 65S Foothills 237S 70 Yes 646L Foothills 237S Okotoks 678S 130 Yes

733L Namaka 428S Gleichen 179S 140 Yes

876L Gleichen 179S Blackie 253S 150 Yes

Page 90: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

0.75

0.77

0.79

0.81

0.83

0.85

0.87

0.89

0.91

0.93

0.95

0.97

0.99

1.01

1.03

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170

Bus V

olta

ge (p

u)

Incremental Study Area (MW)

2017WP-Post-Project-: High River 65S 138 kV Bus Voltage (bus # 242)

Normal Operation (Category A)

Outage 691L Janet 74S toChestermere 419S

Outage 434L High River 65S toFoothills 237S

Outage 646L Okotoks 678S toFoothills 237S

Outage 733L Namaka 428SS toGleichen 179S

Outage 876L Gleichen 179S toBlackie 253S

Page 91: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

0.75

0.77

0.79

0.81

0.83

0.85

0.87

0.89

0.91

0.93

0.95

0.97

0.99

1.01

1.03

1.05

1.07

1.09

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170

Bus V

olta

ge (p

u)

Incremental Study Area (MW)

2017WP-Post-Project-: High River 65S 25 kV Bus Voltage (bus # 2242)

Normal Operation (Category A)

Outage 691L Janet 74S toChestermere 419S

Outage 434L High River 65S toFoothills 237S

Outage 646L Okotoks 678S toFoothills 237S

Outage 733L Namaka 428SS toGleichen 179S

Outage 876L Gleichen 179S toBlackie 253S

Page 92: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

0.75

0.77

0.79

0.81

0.83

0.85

0.87

0.89

0.91

0.93

0.95

0.97

0.99

1.01

1.03

1.05

1.07

1.09

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170

Bus V

olta

ge (p

u)

Incremental Study Area (MW)

2017WP-Post-Project-: Okotoks 678S 138 kV Bus Voltage (bus # 239)

Normal Operation (Category A)

Outage 691L Janet 74S toChestermere 419S

Outage 434L High River 65S toFoothills 237S

Outage 646L Okotoks 678S toFoothills 237S

Outage 733L Namaka 428SS toGleichen 179S

Outage 876L Gleichen 179S toBlackie 253S

Page 93: Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application...Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: Fortis Okotoks 678S and High River 65S Upgrades Page 2 Public R1-2016-07-27

0.75

0.77

0.79

0.81

0.83

0.85

0.87

0.89

0.91

0.93

0.95

0.97

0.99

1.01

1.03

1.05

1.07

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170

Bus V

olta

ge (p

u)

Incremental Study Area (MW)

2017WP-Post-Project-: Okotoks 678S 25 kV Bus Voltage (bus # 4239)

Normal Operation (Category A)

Outage 691L Janet 74S toChestermere 419S

Outage 434L High River 65S toFoothills 237S

Outage 646L Okotoks 678S toFoothills 237S

Outage 733L Namaka 428SS toGleichen 179S

Outage 876L Gleichen 179S toBlackie 253S