Congestion Management Process Report 2015 · 2016-08-31 · Congestion Management Process Report 2015 Prepared By: Stark County Area Transportation Study (SCATS) 201 Third St. NE,

Congestion Management

Process Report

2015

Prepared By:

Stark County Area Transportation Study (SCATS)

201 Third St. NE, Suite 201

Canton, Ohio 44702-1211

FINAL

June, 2016

This report is the product of a study financed in part by the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway

Administration, Federal Transit Administration, and the Ohio Department of Transportation. The contents of this

report reflect the views of the Stark County Area Transportation Study, which is responsible for the facts and the

accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the U.S.

Department of Transportation. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation.

Page i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

LIST OF TABLES AND MAPS ................................................................................................................. II

CHAPTER 1 – INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1

WHAT IS THE CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROCESS? ................................................................................ 1

CONGESTION ............................................................................................................................................... 1

INCORPORATION WITH THE TRANSPORTATION PLAN AND TIP .................................................................... 2

SCOPE AND PURPOSE ................................................................................................................................... 2

CHAPTER 2 – CMP SYSTEM AND PROCEDURE ............................................................................... 3

CMP PROCEDURES ...................................................................................................................................... 3

CMP SYSTEM DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................................................ 3

HIGHWAY SYSTEM ...................................................................................................................................... 3

Travel Demand Model Network ............................................................................................................. 4

Transit System ........................................................................................................................................ 5

Data Collection ...................................................................................................................................... 5

Performance Measures Selected ............................................................................................................ 5

Performance Measure Definitions .......................................................................................................... 6

Analysis .................................................................................................................................................. 7

CHAPTER 3 – SYSTEM-WIDE ANALYSIS ............................................................................................ 8

SYSTEM-WIDE STATISTICS .......................................................................................................................... 8

EXISTING HIGHWAY SYSTEM CONDITIONS ................................................................................................. 9

COMPARISON WITH PREVIOUS CMP ANALYSIS ..........................................................................................11

2015 CONDITIONS ON THE EXISTING-PLUS-COMMITTED HIGHWAY SYSTEM .............................................12

FUTURE CONDITIONS ON THE E+C HIGHWAY SYSTEM ..............................................................................14

FUTURE CONDITIONS ON THE TRANSPORTATION PLAN HIGHWAY SYSTEM ...............................................18

SUMMARY OF SYSTEM-WIDE ANALYSIS .....................................................................................................20

CHAPTER 4 -- TRANSIT ..........................................................................................................................22

FIXED-ROUTE SERVICES ............................................................................................................................22

Paratransit Services ..............................................................................................................................27

Other Services .......................................................................................................................................27

TRANSIT LOAD FACTORS ...........................................................................................................................27

SARTA SYSTEM EVALUATION ..................................................................................................................28

CHAPTER 5 - CMP STRATEGIES ..........................................................................................................29

CMP Strategies ......................................................................................................................................29

Selection of Strategies ...........................................................................................................................29

ITS Applications ....................................................................................................................................30

Page ii

CMP STRATEGIES ALREADY IMPLEMENTED ..............................................................................................30

Urban Freeway Reference Markers ......................................................................................................30

Winter Snow and Ice Clearance ............................................................................................................30

OTIS - The Ohio Transportation Information System ...........................................................................30

Access management techniques .............................................................................................................30

SCATS CMP RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................................ERROR! BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED.

Akron-Canton Freeway Management System.......................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

Transit Management ..............................................................................................................................31

Traffic operations improvements ...........................................................................................................31

Measures to Encourage Bicycling and Non-motorized Travel ..............................................................32

CHAPTER 6 — CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................33

APPENDIX ..................................................................................................................................................35

LIST OF TABLES AND MAPS

Table 2-1. Stark County Functional Classification of Roads ........................................................................ 4

Table 2-2. Selected Performance Measurements ........................................................................................... 6

Figure 2-1. Congestion Index Formula .......................................................................................................... 7

Table 3-1. V/C ratios to service levels........................................................................................................... 8

Table 3-2. Existing Traffic on the Existing Highway System ....................................................................... 9

Map 3-1. Existing Traffic on the Existing Highway System ........................................................................10

Figure 3-1. Vehicle Hours of Delay - Existing Traffic on the Existing Highway System ............................11

Table 3-3. Year 2007 Traffic on the 2007 Highway System ....................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

Table 3-4. 2015 Traffic on the E+C Highway System ...............................................................................142

Map 3-2. 2015 Traffic on the E+C Highway System .................................................................................163

Figure 3-2. Vehicle Hours of Delay – 2015 Traffic on the E+C Highway System ....................................174

Table 3-5. Future Traffic on the E+C Highway System .............................................................................184

Map 3-3. Future Traffic on the E+C Highway System ...............................................................................196

Figure 3-3. Vehicle Hours of Delay – Future Traffic on the 2030 Plan Highway System ...........................17

Table 3-6. Future Traffic on the Transportation Plan Highway System…………………………………...18

Map 3-4. Future Traffic on the Transportation Plan Highway System…………………………………….19

Figure 3-4. Vehicle Hours of Delay - Future Traffic on the Transportation Plan Highway System……….20

Table 4-1 SARTA Fixed-Route Service Areas..............................................................................................22

Table 4-2 SARTA System Evaluation ........................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

Table 5-1 Traffic Flow Improvements in the TIP ........................................................................................311

Page 1

CHAPTER 1 – INTRODUCTION

The Congestion Management Process (CMP) is a process for the safe and effective

management and operation of the transportation system to reduce congestion. The CMP

is a requirement of the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act:

A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) enacted in 2005. The CMP continues to be a

requirement under Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21).

In 1991, the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) required the

development and implementation of a Congestion Management System (CMS) in each

transportation management area (TMA) to identify, measure, and monitor congestion as

well as to address the sources of congestion. ISTEA shifted emphasis away from the

construction of new infrastructure to better maintenance and management of the existing

transportation system. Congress updated this emphasis in 1998 with the passage of the

Transportation Efficiency Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21).

Originally, states were required to develop a statewide CMS. However, this

requirement was eliminated, and each TMA in Ohio is now responsible for its own CMP.

A TMA is defined as a metropolitan area with a population of more than 200,000. The

SCATS planning area includes all of Stark County and contains more than 378,000

people. As a result, the SCATS area has been designated as a TMA and must implement

a Traffic Congestion Management Process (CMP) in cooperation with the Ohio

Department of Transportation (ODOT).

What is the Congestion Management Process?

The CMP is a planning tool used by SCATS to analyze the transportation system and

plan and implement travel demand reduction and operational management strategies to

reduce or minimize congestion. The purpose of the CMP is to:

Manage or reduce the existing congestion

Efficiently utilize existing transportation facilities

Maximize the mobility of persons and goods

Keep future congestion problems from occurring.

Congestion

Congestion occurs in two basic forms – reoccurring and non-reoccurring. Reoccurring

congestion is caused by travel demand exceeding travel system capacity. It occurs every

day where roads are too narrow, signal timing is inappropriate, or transit systems do not

provide enough service. The SCATS CMP is designed to analyze and address this type

of congestion. Non-reoccurring congestion is caused by incidents affecting the system.

The incidents may affect either the demand or capacity of the system. Accidents, vehicle

breakdowns, short-term construction, and weather are all incidents that affect the capacity

Page 2

of the system and cause congestion. Sporting events, rock concerts and other major

traffic generating incidents all may cause congestion by temporarily increasing the

demand on the transportation system.

Incorporation with the Transportation Plan and TIP

SCATS uses the CMP for input in the development of the SCATS Transportation Plan

to identify the areas and extent of existing and future congestion, to develop specific

strategies to minimize congestion, to help develop the SCATS Transportation

Improvement Program (TIP), and to monitor and evaluate the congestion management

strategies.

Scope and Purpose

The purpose of this report is to document the performance of the transportation system

in the SCATS area and identify appropriate strategies to reduce congestion. This report

contains 6 chapters. In Chapter 2, SCATS CMP procedures are documented. A system-

wide analysis of the highway system is the subject of Chapter 3. Chapter 4 focuses on

public transportation and identifies the level of service provided by mass transit routes.

Chapter 5 presents the CMP strategies recommended for the SCATS area. Finally,

Chapter 6 is a summary and conclusion of the entire report.

Page 3

CHAPTER 2 – CMP SYSTEM AND PROCEDURE

In this chapter, we describe the CMP process and document the procedures utilized.

CMP Procedures

A management system is a systematic process designed to assist decision-makers in

selecting cost-effective strategies to improve the efficiency and safety of, and protect the

investment in, the nation’s transportation infrastructure. A management system includes:

1. System Identification

2. Data collection

3. Performance measures.

4. Analysis.

5. Evaluation and selection of appropriate strategies to address the needs.

6. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the implemented strategies.

CMP System Description

According to the Federal-Aid Policy Guide, the CMP in a TMA should cover all

transportation facilities and modes, including highway, transit, and intermodal facilities.

The SCATS CMP planning area includes of all of Stark County. The area contains about

598 square miles. The focus of the CMP will be on the persons and goods movement

over a network of freeways, arterials, transit routes, and other important related highway

facilities. These routes serve as the fundamental network of a defined set of CMP

corridors/locations. This system connects the area's main urban/activity centers and

intermodal facilities.

There are two components to the SCATS CMP monitoring network – a Highway

Component and a Transit Component.

Highway System

Transportation engineers and planners use the concept of functional classification to

divide the highway system by function or type of service they provide. SCATS uses the

Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) functional classification system. The federal

system no longer has separate classes for urbanized areas and rural areas. However, we

have broken down our roadways based on urban and rural areas because it affects the

capacities of the roads. Urbanized areas are defined by the census and generally include

a city with a population greater than 50,000 and the surrounding areas that are developed.

Small urban areas are those cities and surrounding areas with a population of 5,000 or

more not within any urbanized area. Rural areas are those outside the boundaries of

small urban or urbanized areas.

Page 4

Within Stark County are approximately 3,180 miles of streets and highways, functionally

classified as follows:

February, 2015 Miles

Classification Rural Urban Total

Interstates 3.71 14.84 18.55

Freeways &

Expressways 3.75 27.62 31.36

Other Principal Arterials 30.74 120.17 150.91

Principal Arterials 34.49 147.79 182.27

Minor Arterials 63.49 168.35 231.84

Major Collectors 79.13 223.24 302.37

Minor Collectors 114.82 31.47 146.29

Collectors 193.95 254.71 448.66

Locals 515.62 1,783.38 2,299.00

Total 811.26 2,369.06 3,180.32

Table 2-1: Stark County Functional Classification of Roads

Most of Stark County is in the Canton Urbanized Area including the Cities of Canal

Fulton, Canton, Massillon, North Canton and Louisville. It also includes Brewster, East

Canton, Hills & Dales, Meyers Lake and Navarre Villages as well as portions of

Bethlehem, Canton, Jackson, Lake, Lawrence, Nimishillen, Osnaburg, Perry, Pike, Plain,

Sugar Creek, and Tuscarawas Townships. The Akron Urbanized Area extends into Stark

County and includes Hartville and portions of Jackson, Lake and Lawrence Townships.

The Alliance small urban area consists of the City of Alliance and portions of Lexington

and Washington Townships. The remainder of Stark County is rural.

Within a given area, roads are classified as to their role in serving travel mobility needs

versus land access needs. The highest classification, the interstate system, is devoted

entirely to serve travel needs with no access to adjacent property allowed. Arterial streets

and highways serve the longer distant trips between cities and connect different areas of

the larger cities. Although access to adjacent property is allowed, it is often restricted to

allow the arterial to serve travel needs. Local roads and streets serve adjacent property.

Through traffic on the local street system should be discouraged. Collectors serve a dual

role of traffic mobility and land access. Locally important traffic generators are usually

located along collectors. As their name implies, they also serve to collect traffic from the

local street system and connect it to the arterial system.

Travel Demand Model Network

In order to determine future traffic volumes and analyze congestion, SCATS uses the

travel demand model network. This network includes approximately 1,250 miles of

Page 5

roads covering all of Stark County including all roads classified as collector or above and

other important local roads. The network contains roadway information from which

basic highway capacities can be calculated. With the addition of volume information

from traffic counts or traffic assignments, performance measures can be calculated. This

network is linked to the SCATS traffic counting database and GIS system in order to

have the latest volume information available and to map data.

Transit System

The Stark Area Regional Transit Authority (SARTA) operates a fixed-route scheduled

service throughout the entire county. Within Stark County SARTA operates 26 fixed

routes serving an area of approximately 567 square miles and about 375,000 people.

Principal communities served include the cities of Canton, Massillon, Alliance, North

Canton, and Louisville; the village of East Canton; and Jackson, Plain, and Perry

Townships. In addition to these services, SARTA operates a demand-response service

tailored to the needs of persons with disabilities and the elderly.

The CMP Public Transportation Component includes those transit routes operated by the

Stark Area Regional Transit Authority (SARTA) that provide regularly scheduled public

transit service over a fixed route utilizing the CMP highway component. Data provided

by SARTA is used to evaluate the ability of transit service to serve passengers and reduce

highway congestion.

Data Collection

In order to monitor performance of the transportation system, each link of the

transportation network is monitored. Two basic types of information are necessary. The

first is information on system usage. For the current highway system, traffic volume

counts are collected. Traffic volumes are obtained through the SCATS traffic counting

program, which includes traffic counts from a wide variety of sources. This data is

maintained on a regular basis and recent traffic counts are available for most links in the

network. Future year traffic volumes come from the SCATS traffic assignments. Transit

ridership data is monitored by SARTA.

The second type of information is system supply or system capacity. This information is

calculated for the highway system based on information such as roadway width, number

of lanes, turning lanes, traffic signal timing and other factors. Transit capacity is based

on the number of buses and their seating capacity on each route.

Performance Measures Selected

Performance measures describe how severe the congestion is on a transportation facility.

Congestion is not a technical term and can be interpreted in different ways. Performance

measures describe and quantify congestion by measuring increases in delay and the

amount by which capacity is exceeded. The transportation planning and engineering

fields have generally used mode-specific performance measures to describe conditions on

a particular mode. These measures include traffic volumes, capacities, and Level-of-

Service calculations for motor vehicles, and peak loading points for transit modes.

Page 6

Performance measures are used in system detection, strategy evaluation testing, and

monitoring and evaluating. System detection is determining where the congestion

problems are occurring within the system. Strategy evaluation testing is the

determination of what strategies will be most effective in reducing congestion in a

particular area. Monitoring and evaluating tell how well the strategies are working.

SCATS has selected the following performance measures to be used in its CMP:

Measure Facility/Mode

Vehicle Hours of Delay Region

Level of Service Facility

Volume-to-capacity Ratio Facility

Load Factor Transit

Congestion Index Region

Table 2-2: Selected Performance Measurements

Performance Measure Definitions

These performance measures were selected from a list of measures recommended by

ODOT and are described below:

Vehicle Hours of Delay – Delay time is the difference between free flow time to

travel a facility and the congested time to travel the facility. Vehicles Hours of

Delay is calculated by multiplying the delay time by the daily volume to obtain

daily vehicle hours of delay.

Level of Service - (abbreviated LOS) a measure of the quality of service provided

by a highway under a given traffic volume and other conditions. Levels of

service range from A to F with A representing an excellent level of service and F

representing a failure condition.

Volume-to-Capacity ratio - (abbreviated V/C ratio) the traffic volume on a

roadway divided by the capacity of the roadway. For the SCATS CMP, all

capacities were determined at LOS C. Therefore, V/C ratios over 1.0 indicate

operating conditions worse than LOS C.

Load Factor - the average passenger-to-capacity ratio for transit vehicles.

Roadway Congestion Index - an index developed by the Texas Transportation

Institute. This index is useful for comparisons of urban networks. The resulting

ratio indicates an undesirable level of area-wide congestion if a value greater than

or equal to 1.0 is obtained. The congestion index is a macroscopic measure, which

does not account for local bottlenecks or variations in travel patterns that affect

time of travel or origin-destination combinations. It averages all the roadway

segments within an urban area. There will be locations in the urban area where

congestion is much worse or better.

The congestion index is calculated by the following equation:

Page 7

VMT) ArterialPrin (5,500VMT)Freeway (14,000

Miles Lane ArterialPrin

VMT) Arterial(Prin

Miles LaneFreeway

VMT)(Freeway

Index Congestion

22

Figure 2-1: Congestion Index Formula

Analysis

Once the system identification, data collection and performance measure selection steps

have been completed, analysis of congestion can begin by using various methods,

including:

1. The urban transportation planning models

2. Manual calculations

3. Available software packages (such as Highway Capacity Software)

4. Field observations

The SCATS urban transportation planning models were chosen to analyze the existing

transportation system. Roadway data was coded for all routes in the traffic assignment

network. A capacity calculator routine calculates the capacity of each network link. The

capacity calculator output is a daily capacity based on Level of Service C. Existing

average daily traffic volumes are divided by this capacity to calculate a Volume-to-

capacity or V/C ratio.

Future conditions are estimated by loading future trips on either the existing base network

or a future planned network. Comparisons are made between a base congestion and

future congestion. The performance measures identified earlier are used as indicators to

measure the performance of the transportation system and evaluate alternative strategies

to deal with congestion.

Existing congestion may also be identified and quantified by more direct measures such

as speed and delay runs and other traffic engineering analysis tools. Certain facilities

may also require a more detailed analysis of congestion using the Highway Capacity

Manual operations analysis. This analysis can be used to quantify changes in congestion

due to traffic signal modifications and other operational improvements which the

network-based methods are not sensitive enough to analyze.

Page 8

CHAPTER 3 – SYSTEM-WIDE ANALYSIS

In order to plan effectively for transportation improvements, it is first necessary to

understand the performance of the existing transportation system. This chapter identifies

existing and future congestion based on the results of level of service analyses. System-

wide statistics are used to evaluate the overall operation of the transportation system.

System-wide Statistics

System-wide statistics were developed to establish the baseline performance of the

existing transportation system, calculate how congestion would be affected by traffic

growth in the future, and evaluate the performance of the SCATS Transportation Plan.

The travel demand models furnish both individual highway segment volumes and

capacities. Capacities are calculated using functional class, area type, number of lanes,

intersection geometry and pavement width. Intersections are modeled by traffic control

type (pre-timed signal, interconnected signal, all-way stop, two-way stop or

uncontrolled).

Capacity is defined as the total number of vehicles in both directions that can pass over a

given section of roadway under a given set of operating conditions or level of service.

CMP capacities are daily capacities. Daily capacities are used because only average daily

traffic volumes are available on a system-wide basis. The daily capacity is calculated by

dividing the peak hour capacity by the “K” factor. The “K” factor represents the portion

of the typical daily traffic during the peak hour traffic and is usually 10%. The CMP

roadway capacity is based on Level of Service C. Those links operating at a volume-to-

capacity ratio greater than 1.0 were identified as deficient. The volume-to-capacity

ratios, corresponding to each level of service, are shown below:

Level of Service V/C Ratio

A < =0.50

B 0.51 – 0.75

C 0.76 – 1.00

D 1.01 – 1.25

E 1.26 – 1.60

F > 1.60

Table 3-1: V/C ratios to service levels

Page 9

Existing Highway System Conditions

Table 3-2 shows existing (2015) highway system conditions. The traffic is from actual

counts from the SCATS traffic count database. For the future scenarios, we have used

the traffic assignment models produce directional traffic volumes. The models split daily

traffic volumes into hourly volumes by direction and then compute volume-to-capacity

ratios, levels of service, vehicle miles traveled, vehicle hours traveled, average speed, and

miles traveled by level of service.

The congestion analysis shows approximately 8.1 miles of the existing highway system

operating at levels of service D, E or F. The roadway congestion index of this system

was calculated to be 0.66.

Table 3-2: Existing Traffic on the Existing Highway System

A B C D E F

Freeway 19.38 18.13 0 0 0 0 37.52 93.80 1,014,954 265.4

Expressway 59.21 2.1 0 0 0 0 61.32 130.43 667,929 25.5

Ramp 21.62 2.93 0.27 0.19 0 0 25.01 25.84 102,499 62.3

Arterial 312.56 64.26 18.73 3.35 1.38 0.19 400.47 975.92 1,858,644 3076.7

Collector 378.79 24.91 5.46 2.91 0 0 412.06 845.23 639,439 818.8

Local 301.04 6.71 0.42 0.03 0 0 308.20 619.55 188,552 41.0

Grand Total 1092.6 119.04 24.88 6.48 1.38 0.19 1244.57 2690.77 4,472,017 4289.7

Miles at Level of ServiceFacility

TypeTotal Miles

Vehicle

MilesVeh Hours of DelayLane Miles

This system includes all highway facilities that currently exist. Existing levels of service

on this system are shown on Map 3-1. Congested locations include US 62 between

Market Ave and Harmont Ave, US 62 south of US 30, SR 241 south of Lake Ave in

Massillon, SR 800 from Mill St to I-77, US 62/SR 173 in Alliance, SR 619 in the

Uniontown area, Applegrove St from Whipple Ave to Main St, and Whipple Ave from

Applegrove St to Shuffel St. While the system analysis was carried out with directional

capacities and directional volumes, the levels of service shown on this map and

subsequent maps in this chapter, reflect a level of service calculated by adding together

the directional volumes and dividing by the total of the two directional capacities. This

was done because a link couldn’t be drawn in different colors if the directions had

different levels of service.

2015 Congestion Management Process

Existing Traffic on Existing System

(Licensed to Ohio MPO)

Level Of Service

A

B

C

D

E

F

Centroid Link

dkslicke

Text Box

Map 3-1

Page 11

As shown in Figure 3-1, most delay occurs on the arterial and collector systems with very

little delay occurring at the lower levels of service.

Figure 3-1: Vehicle Hours of Delay - Existing Traffic on the Existing Highway

System

Comparison with previous CMP analysis

Part of the CMP is to monitor current conditions compared to the past. Table 3-3 shows

the analysis done for the highway system in 2011.

Table 3-3: Year 2011 Traffic on the 2011 Highway System

Facility

Type

Miles at Level of Service Total

Miles

Lane

Miles

Vehicle

Miles

Veh Hours of

Delay A B C D E F

Freeway 18.77 8.92 9.31 0.52 - - 37.52 93.80 1,021,292 882.2

Expressway 57.80 2.61 0.90 - - - 61.32 130.43 788,536 150.9

Ramp 17.83 3.85 2.12 1.20 - - 25.01 25.84 104,505 235.5

Arterial 284.51 70.88 29.20 9.39 4.46 1.03 400.47 972.11 3,707,483 4773.1

Collector 368.59 24.40 11.08 3.95 2.24 1.14 411.41 845.15 1,461,379 1790.1

Local 288.35 14.25 4.25 0.61 0.43 0.33 308.22 619.59 405,897 414.5

Grand Total 1036.85 124.92 56.87 15.67 7.13 2.50 1243.94 2686.92 7,489,093 8246.3

The 2011 analysis looked at traffic congestion on the 2011 highway system. Tables 3-2

and 3-3 show improvements in service on the interstate system between 2011 and 2011.

In 2011, 0.5 miles of the interstate operated below LOS C. In 2015, 0 miles of interstate

operated below LOS C. The arterial system showed decreases in miles operating below

Page 12

LOS C, from 14.88 to 4.9. The miles of collectors operating below LOS C decreased

from 7.3 to 2.1. The congestion index rose from 0.63 to 0.66, however, total vehicle

hours of delay dropped from 8,246 to 4,290. Total VMT decreased from 7.49 million to

4.47 million.

2019 Conditions on the Existing-Plus-Committed Highway System

Table 3-4 shows 2019 conditions on the existing-plus-committed (E+C) highway system.

Because several projects are committed to be built over the next few years in the

Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), we will now look at the E+C system. The

E+C highway system is the current highway system as it exists today plus the projects

scheduled to be built in the current TIP.

The congestion analysis shows about 28.9 miles of the system operating below LOS C.

The roadway congestion index of this system was 0.85.

Table 3-4: 2019 Traffic on the E+C Highway System

A B C D E F

Freeway 18.77 8.49 8.18 2.08 0 0 37.52 93.80 1,219,662 1235.0

Expressway 58.20 2.21 0.09 0.81 0 0 61.31 130.43 841,758 178.7

Ramp 18.38 2.95 1.85 1.57 0.27 0 25.02 25.84 147,724 359.3

Arterial 289.69 63.14 33.35 8.82 4.32 1.37 400.69 975.85 4,026,226 11145.6

Collector 371.07 22.82 10.17 3.09 2.70 2.18 412.03 845.17 1,526,393 13923.4

Local 292.37 10.38 3.71 0.97 0.34 0.39 308.16 619.48 447,288 5816.5

Grand Total 1048.48 109.99 57.35 17.34 7.63 3.94 1244.73 2690.57 8,209,052 32658.5

Veh Hours

of Delay

Facility

Type


Miles

Lane

MilesVehicle Miles

This system includes all highway facilities that currently exist plus all projects in the

2016-2019 TIP. Levels of service on this system are shown on Map 3-2. The E+C

analysis shows quite a bit more congestion than the analysis of current conditions. This

is partly because the analysis of current conditions uses actual traffic counts while the

E+C analysis uses modeled traffic volumes. The model tends to assign too much traffic

in certain areas. Congested locations include US 62 between Harmont Ave and I-77,

Applegrove Street between North Main Street and Whipple Avenue, Mount Pleasant

Street between Cleveland Avenue and Lauby Road, SR 619 west of Hartville, Wales

Avenue in Massillon, US 62 south of US 30, Perry Drive south of SR 172, US 30 in East

Canton, 12th Street NW near I-77, SR 800 near I-77, the Belden Village area, and State

Street in Alliance.

Congestion Management Process

2019 Traffic on Existing Plus Committed Network


A

B

C

D

E

F

Centroid Link

dkslicke

Text Box

Map 3-2

Page 14

As shown in Figure 3-2, most delay occurs on the arterial and collector systems on the

links with levels of service D, E, or F.

Figure 3-2: Vehicle Hours of Delay - 2015 Traffic on the E+C Highway System

Future Conditions on the E+C Highway System

Table 3-5 shows future conditions on the E+C highway system. This is the No-build

condition that transportation planners analyze as a basis for planning future

improvements. The future traffic is from a traffic assignment using 2040 independent

variables. The 2040 traffic figures show a total of 9.41 million daily vehicle miles of

travel compared to 8.21 in 2019. The congestion analysis shows approximately 57.9

miles of the no-build highway system operating at levels of service D, E or F compared

to 28.9 miles in 2019. The roadway congestion index of this system was calculated to be

0.94 compared to 0.85 in 2019. The daily vehicle hours of delay rose from 32,659 in

2019 to 63,424 in 2030.

Table 3-5: Future Traffic on the E+C Highway System

A B C D E F

Freeway 16.58 4.58 9.55 6.81 0.00 0.00 37.52 93.80 1,220,714 2861.3

Expressway 43.89 14.31 2.30 0.81 0.00 0.00 61.31 130.43 1,056,695 489.6

Ramp 18.02 2.12 2.37 1.18 1.33 0.00 25.02 25.84 118,516 770.7

Arterial 239.65 88.17 39.77 21.01 8.07 4.03 400.70 975.85 4,730,096 25684.3

Collector 357.30 31.25 11.69 4.67 4.04 3.07 412.02 845.16 1,800,713 22908.4

Local 286.85 12.60 5.80 1.64 0.84 0.43 308.16 619.48 481,737 10709.5

Grand Total 962.29 153.03 71.48 36.12 14.28 7.53 1244.73 2690.56 9,408,470 63423.8

Miles at Level of ServiceFacility

Type

Veh Hours

of DelayVehicle Miles

Lane

Miles

Total

Miles

Levels of service for future traffic on this system are shown on Map 3-3. Congestion has

grown worse compared to the 2019 analysis on Applegrove Street, Wales Avenue, State

Page 15

Street, SR 619, US 62 south of US 30, US 62 between Harmont Avenue and Market

Avenue, SR 93 in Canal Fulton, US 30 in East Canton, US 30 in Minerva, SR 183 in

Minerva, SR 43 south of Canton, SR 800, and the Belden Village area. In addition, I-77

is now congested from SR 800 to Summit County.


2040 Traffic on Existing Plus Committed Network


Level of Service

A

B

C

D

E

F

Centroid Link

dkslicke

Text Box

Map 3-3

Page 17

Figure 3-3: Vehicle Hours of Delay – Future Traffic on the E+C Highway System

Figure 3-3 depicts delay by facility type on the existing highway system with 2040

traffic. The chart shows that delay is almost twice as high with future traffic. Arterial

delay increases from 11000 hours to over 25000 hours. As in figure 3-2, most delay

occurs on the arterial and collector systems.

Page 18

Future Conditions on the Transportation Plan Highway System

Table 3-6 shows future conditions on the SCATS 2040 Transportation Plan Highway

System.

Table 3-6: Future Traffic on the Transportation Plan Highway System

A B C D E F

Freeway 17.11 4.58 8.70 7.24 0.98 0.00 38.61 94.90 1,254,354 3363.0

Expressway 55.19 36.33 2.30 0.40 0.41 0.00 94.63 177.56 1,465,873 574.4

Ramp 19.64 1.89 2.06 1.04 1.20 0.00 25.83 26.66 108,552 657.0

Arterial 276.30 65.70 34.85 16.01 6.82 2.20 401.88 1009.28 4,343,838 22925.6

Collector 365.56 31.30 10.94 4.96 2.06 2.85 417.67 859.40 1,779,772 22672.3

Local 287.98 13.60 5.57 1.23 1.09 0.43 309.90 622.92 419,860 11898.1

Grand Total 1021.78 153.40 64.42 30.88 12.56 5.48 1288.52 2790.72 9,372,249 62090.4

Facility

Type


Miles

Lane

Miles

Vehicle

Miles

Veh Hours

of Delay

By the year 2040, traffic on the CMP system is predicted to decrease to 9.37 million daily

vehicle miles on the 2040 highway system from 9.41 million vehicle miles on the no-

build highway system. Apparently some new roads will allow for shorter trips. The

roadway congestion index of this system was calculated to be 0.91, down from 0.94

under no-build conditions. The miles of road operating at levels of service D, E and F

drop from 57.9 miles to 48.9 miles. Vehicle hours of delay drop from 63,424 hours to

62,090.

Levels of service for this scenario are shown on Map 3-4. Comparison of this map to

Map 3-3 shows improvements in levels of service on US 30 in East Canton, I-77 in

Canton, SR-619 west of Hartville, Mount Pleasant Street, State Street in Alliance, Genoa

Avenue and Perry Drive in Perry Township.


2040 Traffic on 2040 Network


Level of Service

A

B

C

D

E

F

Centroid Link

dkslicke

Text Box

Map 3-4

Page 20

Figure 3-4 depicts delay by facility type on the Transportation Plan network. As in

previous scenarios, most delay occurs on the arterial and collector systems.

Figure 3-4: Vehicle Hours of Delay – Future Traffic on the 2040 Plan Highway

System

Summary of System-wide Analysis

This chapter has presented statistics on the system-wide performance of the existing and

planned highway system with existing and future traffic. The analysis was completed

using the SCATS travel demand models. These models are appropriate for this level of

study, but the limitations of this analysis must be recognized. The volumes produced by

the travel demand models are not always a realistic depiction of existing or future traffic.

In the models all traffic from a zone is loaded onto the network at individual points,

whereas in real life traffic enters onto collector and arterial streets in a dispersed pattern

from many driveways and local streets. Because of the single point loadings on the

model, some highway segments are overloaded if the traffic zone trips are large. This

problem can be seen on the maps in this chapter on local and collector streets near

colleges and hospitals. Another problem with our traffic models is the right angle of the

boundary near the Akron-Canton Airport. In reality, a vehicle traveling from northwest

Lake Township to Jackson Township would go through Summit County. Leaving and

reentering the model area is not possible with our software. As a result, Cleveland

Avenue in Lake Township and Mount Pleasant Street in Jackson Township get assigned

too much traffic in our models. This limitation is one reason that the analysis using

actual traffic volumes shows much less congestion than the analyses using model-

assigned volumes.

Another limitation of using the travel demand models is the calculation of capacity. The

models calculate capacity using only a few factors coded into the model link data. A

more sophisticated capacity analysis would take into account, the percentage of turns,

Page 21

signal timing and phasing, length of turn lanes and truck, bus and pedestrian volumes.

The travel demand models provide only a general measure of capacity and may over or

understate the true capacity of a highway segment. Readers should use caution in trying

to use this report’s figures on an individual roadway’s volumes, capacities and

congestion.

Despite the limitations stated above, the system-wide analysis in this chapter provides

valuable information on the overall system performance and of the general magnitude

and location of existing and future congestion.

Page 22

CHAPTER 4 -- TRANSIT

The Stark Area Regional Transit Authority (SARTA) is Stark County’s public transit

agency, providing fixed-route service and Paratransit services. SARTA provides fixed-

route service between major population centers and municipalities within the county and

curb-to-curb Paratransit service for the elderly and physically and mentally challenged

individuals.

Fixed-Route Services

SARTA has a number of routes and schedules designed to meet the needs of riders while

maintaining a cost effective service:

Twenty-Six (26) routes, which operate Monday through Saturday from

approximately 5:45 a.m. to 9:40 p.m. These routes run daily on an hourly basis

except for heavily used routes that run on the half-hour during peak time.

Three (3) late night “industrial loops” operate Monday through Saturday from

9:45 p.m. to 1:30 a.m. with a limited number of runs.

One JARC route with one morning (6.25 a.m.) and one afternoon loop (3:30

p.m.).

One (1) express route operates between Canton Cornerstone and Akron from 5:45

a.m. to 7:45 p.m. with 15 hourly runs Monday through Friday. This route

operates from 5:45 a.m. to 8:45 p.m. on Saturdays from Canton Cornerstone to

Akron Canton Airport.

Table 4-1 SARTA Fixed-Route Service Areas

Route Number & Name

Trips

Per

Day

Service Days, Frequency of Service

Service Area and Points of Interest

81L

Airport Express

16

Operates Saturday hourly.

Serves Belden Village Transit Center and Cornerstone Transit Center in downtown Canton

(on Cherry Avenue). Akron-Canton Airport.

Points of interest: Westfield Shopping Mall (Belden Village), Downtown Canton, Akron-

Canton Airport.

81

Canton/Akron Express

15

Operates Monday through Friday hourly.

Service Area: Akron (connection to METRO buses), Arlington Road, Akron-Canton

Airport, Belden Village area and Cornerstone Zone in downtown Canton (on Cherry

Avenue).

Points of interest: Westfield Shopping Mall (Belden Village), Akron-Canton Airport,

Staples on Arlington Rd, Akron Metro (Transit Center).

Page 23

Route Number & Name

Trips

Per

Day



101

Canton Northeast:

Harrisburg/Walmart

16

Monday-Saturday hourly.

Service Area: The O-Jays Parkway, Harrisburg Road, 25th Street NE, Harmont Avenue,

Mahoning Rd.

Points of interest: Adventure Landings (NECC), Crenshaw Middle School, Coleman Senior

Center, Cook Park, Downtown Canton, Walmart

102

Canton/Perry/ Massillon 24

Monday-Saturday hourly and limited ½ hour.

Service Area: West Tuscarawas and Lincoln Way.

Points of interest: Stark County Job and Family Services, Canton Centre Mall & Walmart,

Perry Heights, Massillon Public Library.

103

Gibbs/Plain Twp.

16


Service Area: Northeast area of Canton: Gibbs Avenue, Colonial Blvd., Middlebranch

Road, Rowland Avenue.

Points of interest: Glen Oak High School, Oakwood Middle School, Park Farms, Firestone

Loop, Gibbs School and Oakwood Square.

105

Cleveland Ave/

North Canton

24

Monday-Saturday hourly and limited ½ hour.

Service Area: North area of Canton: Downtown Canton, Cleveland Avenue, Everhard Road,

Belden Village Street , Holiday Avenue

Points of interest: Life Skills, Fisher Foods, Westfield Shopping Mall, Main Post Office,

Stark County Health Dept, Belden Village Transit Center.

106

Canton SW, Canton NW,

BV Area, The Strip

16


Service Area: Canton: 6th, 9th, 11th St. SW, Bedford, Whipple Ave

Points of interest: Aultman Hospital, Canton Centre Mall, Wal-Mart, Meyers Lake Plaza,

Mayfield Manor, Whippledale, Westfield Mall.

107

East Tuscarawas/

East Canton

24

Monday-Saturday 1/2 hour. East Canton every 2 hours

Service Area: East area of Canton and East Canton: East Tuscarawas, Belden Ave, 8th St.,

Lincoln Street.

Points of interest: Belden School, Girard Gardens Senior Center, Canton Community Clinic,

Dehoff Library, and the East Canton Library.

108

Canton/ Market/ Easton 16


Service Area: North Market area of Canton: Market Avenue, 14th St., and 15th St. and

Easton.

Points of interest: Civic Center, The Palace Theater, Washington Square, Walsh University,

North Branch Library, Stark County District Library Main Branch.

110

Cherry/Warner/ Sherrick 32/16

Monday-Friday 1/2 hour. Service extends to 9:15 p.m. Saturday hourly.

Service Area: Southeast area of Canton: Cherry Ave., Alan Page, Gateway Blvd, Sherrick,

Warner Rd.

Points of interest: Canton Urban League/ Southeast Community Center, Skyline Terrace

Apts., Gateway Homes, SARTA Gateway offices/garage, Dehoff Library, Diebold, Allen

School, Hartford Middle School.

Page 24

Route Number & Name

Trips

Per

Day



111

Downtown

Canton/Harmont/Walmart

16


Cherry Ave., Colonial, Lesh, Maple Ave., Regent, Spangler, 30th St. NE

Points of interest: Aldi's, Kmart, Post Office Maple Branch, Stark County Jail (limited

service), Walmart

112

North Canton/ Uniontown/

Hartville

10

Monday-Friday 1 ½ hour.

Service Area: Northern Stark County, Whipple, Everhard, Main St., Edison (RT 619),

Maple, Lake.

Points of interest: North Canton, Greentown, Uniontown, Hartville, Hartville Kitchen,

Hartville Flea Market, Westfield Mall, Hartville Plastics, Lake Community Library, North

Canton Public Library.

113

Canton SW/ Harrison,

Southway

16


Service Area: Southwest Canton: McKinley Ave., Harrison, Clarendon, 11th St., Maryland,

Linwood, Raff Rd. and Southway.

Points of interest: Goodwill Industries, Canton Police Boys Club, Souers Middle School,

and Southway Industrial Park.

114

South Canton/ Southgate/

East Sparta

28/16

Monday-Friday 1/2 hour, East Sparta 4 hour. Saturday hourly to Southgate.

Service Area: South and Southeast area of Canton: Cherry, 14th St., Market, Allen, Kimball,

Cleveland South and Rt. 800.

Points of interest: Passages School, Compton School, Canton South High School, Higgins

Workshop, Southgate Shopping Center, East Sparta and Sandy Valley Library.

117

Shorb, Meyers Lake,

Fairgrounds, SW Canton

16


Service Area: Northwest area of Canton: Cherry, 6th St., Shorb Ave., 12th St., Clarendon,

Broad, Wertz., Whipple and Southwest area of Canton.

Points of interest: YWCA, Lehman Middle School, McKinley Monument, Mercy Medical

Center, McKinley Senior High School, Pro Football Hall of Fame, Stark County

Fairgrounds, and Meyers Lake Plaza, Aultman Hospital, Canton Centre Mall, Walmart, and

Mayfield Manor.

118

Canton SW/ Perry Twp/

Massillon

16


Service Area: Southwest area of Canton, Perry Twp., and Massillon: Market South,

Southway, 17th Street, Navarre and Erie.

Points of interest: VA Clinic, Timken Harrison/Dueber/Gambrinus, Sterilite, Perry Twp,

Richville, Perry Hills Colony and Walmart.

119 Fulton, 25th, Harvard,

30th Street

16


Service Area: Northwest area of Canton: Fulton, 25th Street., Harvard, 30th Street.

Points of interest: Summit Elementary School, Malone College, 30th Street Plaza, Choices

School, Glenwood Middle School West, Frazer, Jewish Community Center.

Page 25

Route Number & Name

Trips

Per

Day



120

Belden Village/N. Canton

Loop

30/16

Monday-Friday 1/2 hour, extends to 9:30 p.m. Saturday hourly to N. Canton.

Service Area: Jackson Township: Belden Village Ave, Higbee & Holiday, Dressler,

Munson, Everhard, Frank and Strip Ave.

Points of interest: Westfield Mall at Belden Village, Target, Walmart, The Strip, Kent State

University and Stark State College.

121

Belden Village/North

Canton Industrial Park

15

Monday-Saturday hourly

Service Area: Belden Village Transit Center, Holiday Ave, Higbee, The Strip, Whipple

Ave., Shuffel, North Canton Industrial Park

Points of Interest: Aultman Medical Center - North, Belden Village Mall, Mercy Medical

Center & Sports Medicine, Mercy Medical - Hospice, North Canton Industrial Park, The

Strip, Movies 10, Stark State, Tinseltown

122

Massillon Northwest &

Southwest

15


Service Area: Northwest and Southwest area of Massillon: Lincoln Way East, Main Ave,

17th St, 23rd St, Tremont Ave, Walnut Rd, 9th St, Finefrock Rd and 6th Street.

Points of interest: Massillon Boys & Girls Club, Emerson Elementary School, Finefrock Rd,

Heinz Foods, Oberlin Industrial Park.

123

Massillon North

8

Monday-Friday, hourly 11:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.

Service Area: North Massillon : Cherry, 8th St., Lake, Amherst

Points of interest: Affinity Medical Massillon Campus, Amherst Shopping Center.

124

Massillon Southeast

15

Monday-Saturday, hourly 6:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m.

Service Area: Southeast Massillon: Tremont, Walnut, 3rd St, 13th St, Forest, 16th St,

Huron, Shawnee, Harsh, 26th St, and 27th Street.

Points of interest: Massillon Washington High School, Paul Brown Stadium, Walnut Hills,

and Franklin Elementary School.

125

Massillon/Belden Village

15


Service Area: Massillon and Jackson Township area: Amherst, Lake, Wales, Fulton,

Munson, Dressler, Higbee, Holiday.

Points of interest: Amherst Shopping Center, Lake Cable, Affinity Medical Massillon

Campus, Aultman West, Jackson High School, Jackson Library. Lake Cable Medical

Center, Noble’s Pond Shopping, Brown Mackie College

126

Massillon Northwest

16


Service Area: Northwest area of Massillon: 1st St. NW, 1st St. NE, Lake Ave, Cherry Ave

and Lincoln Way W.

Points of interest: Carter Lumber, K of C, Quarry Ridge, Mayflower Park Shopping Center,

Rolling Hills Village Inc.

128

Massillon/ Canton SW

16


Service Area: South Massillon: Erie St S, Menards, Sterlite, Walmart.

Points of interest: Menards and Walmart.

Page 26

Route Number & Name

Trips

Per

Day



130

Alliance/Lincoln, Main,

Nantucket

15


Service Area: Alliance: Prospect, East Main, Rockhill, Cambridge, Lincoln, West Vine,

Nantucket, Shadowridge, Mayfield, Klinger, Gaskill, Beeson, Ely.

Points of interest: Alliance Early Learning School, Alliance Senior Center, South Lincoln

Elementary School, Alliance City Cemetery.

131

Alliance

15


Service Area: East Main, Park, Union Ave, W. State.

Points of interest: Carnation Mall, Wal-Mart, Buckeye Village, Mount Union University,

Alliance Community Hospital, Alliance High School.

139

Canton/Louisville/

Alliance

16


Service Area: Canton, Louisville and Alliance: O’Jays Parkway, Mahoning, Lesh, Main,

Chapel, SR 44, W. State, Sawburg Rd. Beeson/Ely, Main.

Points of interest: Shipley Community Center, JR Coleman Center, William Hunter Center,

Canton Negro Oldtimers, Carnation Mall & Walmart, Buckeye Village.

The three late night “industrial” routes, operating with a limited number of runs Monday through Saturday, were adopted to

provide coverage when regular fixed route services were reduced in the late evening hours and one commute run during the

day. These routes are as follows:

151

North Late Night Loop 3

Monday-Saturday 1 ½ hours, starting 9:45 p.m.

Service Area: North part of Canton: Cleveland Ave, Everhard, Whipple Ave, Kevin, Tim,

Strausser, Shuffel, Freedom, Applegrove, Strip Ave, Mega, Frank, University Dr, Dressler,

Munson, Higbee Ave, 12th St.

Points of interest: North Canton Industrial Park, The Strip, Stark State, Tinseltown, Movies

10, Walmart, Westfield Mall, Meyers Lake Plaza, Mercy Medical.

152

West Late Night Loop 3


Service Area: SW area of Canton to Massillon: Market Ave., Navarre Rd, Southway,

Richville, Perry Drive, Sterilite, Erie St, Massillon Zone, Lincoln Way, Perry Heights, West

Tusc, McKinley Ave, the Canton Zone.

Points of interest: Aultman Hospital, Canton Center Mall, Walmart Canton, Walmart

Massillon, Sterilite and Southway Industrial Park.

153

East Late Night Loop

3


Service Area: SE, NE, & SW area of Canton, Raff Rd, 17th SW, 13th SW, Maryland Ave,

9th St SW, Mahoning, The O’Jays Parkway, Harmont, 30th St NE, Harrisburg, 12th St NE,

Cherry, Market Ave, Warner, Sherrick, Belden Ave, Allen Page.

Points of interest: Aultman Hospital, Linwood Acres, Skyline Terrace Apts, Walmart, Ellis

Dale Apts, C.H.I.P.s Townhomes.

154

Industrial Loop Express

2 Monday-Friday, commute service, one morning outbound, one afternoon return.

Service Area: Downtown Canton, W. Tuscarawas, to Special Packaging.

Page 27

Paratransit Services

In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), SARTA offers

Paratransit service to transport individuals who, because of a functional disability

(physical or cognitive) cannot access or use the fixed route bus system. Qualified

individuals must complete an application that must be signed by a licensed physician.

Qualified riders make reservations up to seven (7) days in advance and no less than 24

hours in advance. Paratransit service and hours reflect the days and hours of fixed route

service. All rides are "curb-to-curb". Curb-to-curb means the driver picks the passenger

up at the curb and drops the passenger off at the curb.

Other Services

Special Event Shuttles are operated during major community events to assist with traffic

congestion and to increase the accessibility of events. These events include activities and

during the Pro Football Hall of Fame Festival, park concerts, sports championships, and

heavy holiday shopping seasons.

Community Coach Service is provided to approximately 22 Stark County senior

citizens’ housing facilities to improve their quality of life by increasing mobility. This

service transports seniors to various shopping areas up to several times a week, dependent

upon demand. Shopping locations are varied each week, with trips alternating between

grocery and other shopping areas. This service is in addition to the available Paratransit

service and assists in lowering the demand for single-ride trips.

Job and Reverse Commute (JARC) services by SARTA have been limited to the 154

route but may be expanded in the near future. SARTA has been reviewing plans to

expand its’ JARC services to assist companies not located on fixed routes where multiple

employees could be served.

Transit Load Factors

The load factor is the performance measure for transit service. The load factor is

calculated by dividing the total number of passengers passing the maximum load point by

the number of seats passing the maximum load point during the operating period being

considered. Load factors exceed 1.00 when passengers without seats have to stand.

Many transit systems plan service for a load factor of 1.25 to 1.50 during the peak hour in

the peak direction. Passenger tolerance for standing varies by the length of the trip.

Passengers tolerate standing for trips of 10 minutes or less. All passengers should be

provided a seat on trips over 30 minutes. Unfortunately, load factors were not calculated

in the latest Transit Development Plan.

SARTA’s objective is to provide a seat for every passenger. As ridership grows in the

future this may not be feasible during the weekday peak period. SARTA’s goal is a load

factor of 1.0 or less on each route. Individual trips can exceed this rate for periods of less

than 15 minutes.

Page 28

SARTA System Evaluation

The SARTA 2015 Transit Development Plan (TDP) finalized in December of 2015 is the

latest evaluation of SARTA’s operations. This evaluation was prepared by the consultant

AECOM.

The TDP, compared unlinked passenger trips, passenger miles traveled, average

passenger trip length, vehicle revenue hours, vehicle revenue miles, passenger trips per

revenue hour, passenger trips per revenue mile, operating costs per passenger trip, and

operating costs per revenue hour.

Table 4-2 SARTA Data from National Transit Database

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Annual Passenger Miles 11,540,775 10,149,079 9,916,934 11,464,591 12,619,719 12,789,633

Annual Unlinked trips 2,303,725 2,025,920 2,108,333 2,437,459 2,518,906 2,552,821

Annual Vehicle Revenue Miles 2,518,231 2,324,370 2,116,316 2,140,860 2,119,345 2,208,234

Annual Vehicle Revenue Hours 157,514 150,381 135,537 137,322 137,484 135,721

Ridership on fixed-routes during 2013 was significantly higher than in 2010, seeing

growth of more than 28%. There were over 2.87 million more passenger trips in 2013

than 2010. SARTA initiated a passenger travel training program in 2010 seeking to

increase the use of fixed-transit for those who previously used paratransit services. The

training is also provided to those with no experience in utilizing public transit including

civic groups, seniors, school classes, college students, etc.

An additional strategy to improve transit ridership included the opening of the Belden

Village Transit Center, thus completing a system of transit centers in the three largest

cities (Canton, Massillon, and Alliance) and the most popular destination (the Belden

Village area).

Please reference the CMP Strategies, Transit Management section, for information on in-

progress and future projects.

Page 29

CHAPTER 5 - CMP STRATEGIES

CMP Strategies

Congestion measured through the CMP can be addressed through alternative operational

and management strategies to ensure the most efficient use of the existing and future

transportation system. CMP strategies include the following:

a. Transportation demand management strategies such as carpooling, vanpooling,

alternative work hours, telecommuting, and parking management.

b. Measures to encourage high occupancy vehicle (HOV) use such as HOV lanes,

public transit improvements, guaranteed ride home and employer trip reduction

ordinances.

c. Congestion Pricing

d. Growth management and activity center strategies

e. Access management techniques

f. Incident Management

g. Application of ITS technology

h. Traffic operations improvements such as intersection and roadway widening,

channelization, geometric and signal improvements

i. Addition of general purpose lanes

Selection of Strategies

Effective congestion strategies depend on the type of congestion present in the area. The

system-wide numbers show that congestion is not a serious problem in the area. The

population of the region is not predicted to grow significantly in the future. Future

increases in traffic are projected to occur because of increased trip making and longer trip

lengths.

Although the public is concerned with congestion, they are most interested in roadway

and traffic operations improvements to relieve congestion. The 2040 Transportation Plan

does include many projects to add general-purpose lanes. These projects include the

extension of US 62 and US 30 freeways and several arterial widening projects.

Transportation demand management, measures to encourage HOV use and congestion

pricing generate little support. In surveys, the public does support growth management

and access management techniques. Stark County is currently trying to implement an

access management plan. These strategies are most useful in fast growing areas to help

control new development. Attempting to apply many access management techniques to

existing development can be costly and face legal challenges.

Page 30

ITS Applications

ITS is the acronym for Intelligent Transportation Systems, a program created under the

US Department of Transportation. ITS embodies the application of computers and

advanced technologies to improve and enhance transportation operations and safety.

Traffic management, traveler information, commercial vehicle operations, public transit

operations, and rural transportation management are major elements of providing real-

time information through advanced technologies. SCATS, in cooperation with ODOT

and AMATS, developed the Akron-Canton Regional ITS Architecture. The architecture

is a roadmap for transportation systems integration in the 3-county region (Summit,

Portage, and Stark) that covers the geographic area of AMATS and SCATS. The

architecture covers a timeframe from the present out to the next ten years.

In recent years ODOT launched a freeway management system for I-77 from Canton to

Akron. SARTA has also been using many ITS strategies in their operations.

CMP Strategies Already Implemented

Freeway Management System

ODOT has installed a freeway management system for Interstate 77 between Akron and

Canton. It includes changeable message boards to alert travelers about up-coming delays,

traffic flow detection, closed circuit cameras, and control center equipment.

Urban Freeway Reference Markers

ODOT has installed urban freeway reference markers on I-77, US 30 and US 62 at 2/10-

mile increments, which allow cellular telephone callers to report incident locations with

greater accuracy. Emergency and towing dispatchers ask cellular telephone callers to look

for these freeway reference markers to ensure that the incident can be found quickly.

Winter Snow and Ice Clearance

Road weather information system (RWIS) units have been deployed throughout the state

of Ohio to furnish maintenance crews with real time information on weather conditions.

This system has also been incorporated in the OTIS data available at the

buckeyetraffic.org website.

OTIS - The Ohio Transportation Information System

This internet-based system, available at buckeyetraffic.org, provides motorists with

searchable construction, road closure and temporary lane restrictions information. There

also is seasonal snow and ice related roadway reporting. See also the Akron-Canton

Freeway Management System, which provides additional data available through this

system.

Access management techniques

The Stark County RPC is responsible for subdivision approval in the unincorporated

areas of Stark County. As part of this process site improvement plans are required for

commercial site improvements. As part of this process the RPC regulates the location

Page 31

and design of driveways ODOT also has adopted access control standards for new

developments along state highways in the rural areas of the county.

Transit Management

SARTA uses a communication system that has replaced the dispatch radio system with

one including features such as Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD), an Automated Vehicle

Locator (AVL) system, an Automated Passenger Count (APC) system, a WEB-based

data feed providing real-time and predictive departure/arrival information, a smart-phone

application for arrival/departure information, QR code stickers for bus stop locations, and

covert security features for vehicles.

Traffic operations improvements

The following intersection and roadway widening, channelization, geometric and signal

improvements are recommended and have been included in the SCATS TIP:

Table 5-1: Traffic Flow Improvements in the TIP

Project

NameLead Agency Description SFY

STA Everhard

Road &

Whipple Ave.

Resurfacing of Everhard from Whipple to Main St. in the City of North

Canton. Replacement of RR tracks on Everhard and Whipple. Ramp work

on I-77NB off Ramp to Everhard. Drop right turn lane from EB Everhard to

SB Whipple. Addition of Center Turn Lane

STARK

COUNTY

ENGINEER

2016

STA SR 93

Cherry /

Locust

Intersection re-construction. Turn lane additions. Extension of turn lanes.

Signal work.

CANAL

FULTON2016

STA SR 0043

17.24

Widening of roadway to 4/5 lanes,including pedestrian/bike tunnel, and

new sidewalks.Designed under PID# 80681, by URS.

DISTRICT 4-

PLANNING2016

STA SR 0153

00.80

Streetscape/economic development project to improve traffic flow and

safety. Address roadway pavement, curbs, sidewalks, ramps, crosswalks,

lights, and signals.

CANTON 2017

STA Beeson/

Freshley

Roundabout

Construct roundabout.

STARK

COUNTY

ENGINEER

2017

STA SR 0619

02.59

Widening from two lanes to 4/5 lanes between Kaufman Avenue to Milan

Street, Lake Township, Stark County, Ohio. Includes turn lanes, possible

roundabouts, signal and sign upgrades, drainage improvements.

DISTRICT 4-

PLANNING2017

STA US 0062

24.90

Realigning and reconfiguring the intersections of US-62, Middlebranch,

Harrisburg, and 30th Street in Plain Township, Stark County, Ohio. Project

includes the construction of a roundabout at Harrisburg and 30th Street.

ODOT 2018

STA W

Maple St (CR-

98)

Extend existing Left Turn lane on West Maple Street (CR 98) between

Main Street and Ream Avenue.

NORTH

CANTON2018

Page 32

In addition to these projects SCATS is recommending that its member agencies evaluate

the signal timing at existing signalized locations where congestion is identified through

the CMP. SCATS will assist with traffic counting services and technical assistance.

Measures to Encourage Bicycling and Non-motorized Travel

As part of the Comprehensive/Transportation Plan, SCATS has recommended the

construction of almost 90 miles of bike and pedestrian routes. Although many users of

these paths are recreational users, the paths provide access to the central business districts

of the major cities and connect residential areas with schools and shopping facilities. In

addition SARTA has implemented a bike-on-the-bus program to encourage the use of the

bus and bicycle for longer trips. The bike and pedestrian path projects are recommended

for construction throughout the life of the Transportation Plan.

Page 33

CHAPTER 6 — CONCLUSION

This report documents the future performance of each link of SCATS CMP network and

compares this performance to the baseline performance of the system. The CMP process

at this point does provide information on where congestion will occur, how travel time

will be affected, and how much delay will occur.

This report gives some indication of how congestion will change in the future. However,

the CMP cannot identify all congestion that will occur on the transportation system. This

is because it does not go into the details of traffic signal timing, turning movements, peak

hour factors, geometric design, bus headways, and other factors that affect the capacity

and level of service of individual links and intersections. The CMP instead provides a

system-wide evaluation and analysis of the system.

The CMP is an excellent tool to quantify and evaluate alternative Transportation Plans

and capacity-management strategies. It identifies the general locations and extent of

congestion on the system. It does not provide final answers or dictate specific projects.

Rather, it guides the decision-making process in transportation planning as a documented

information system.

Page 34

Page 35

APPENDIX

This appendix contains a listing of all links in the traffic assignment network evaluated at

Level of Service D, E or F in any of the scenarios discussed in Chapter 3. Each link is

listed by its node numbers. The general location and existing one-way traffic count is

then given. The next columns show the assigned one-way traffic volume and level of

service for the link.

Link Location Street Name

Existing

1-Way AADT

Model-Assigned

1-Way Volume LOS

1037-6015 Canal Fulton/Lawrence Twp LOCUST 1,000 6,963 E

1087-1088 Jackson Twp PORTAGE 6,000 8,478 D

1088-1123 Jackson Twp PORTAGE 6,000 9,861 E


1135-1166 Jackson Twp FRANK 6,450 10,301 E


1158-4009 Jackson Twp WAYVIEW 4,400 7,774 D


1165-6694 Jackson Twp STRIP 3,900 10,713 E


1169-6695 Jackson Twp STRIP 7,450 9,357 D



1173-1174 NW Canton/Plain Twp WHIPPLE 10,600 21,057 D





1178-6678 Jackson Twp HOLIDAY 1,550 6,243 E

1187-1292 Jackson Twp DRESSLER 9,600 19,120 D

1193-1754 Jackson Twp BELDEN VILLAGE 8,550 12,897 D


1196-1754 Jackson Twp BELDEN VILLAGE 10,900 16,833 E

1218-1289 NW Canton/Plain Twp I-77 Ramp 3,100 19,083 D



1227-1793 Jackson Twp MOUNT PLEASANT 4,650 9,650 F


1229-1393 NE Canton SR-43 10,750 9,651 D

1230-1231 Lake Twp MOUNT PLEASANT 3,700 10,953 F


1230-1802 Plain Twp Pittsburg Ave 5,150 7,839 E





1234-1235 Jackson Twp PITTSBURG 5,100 7,831 D

1234-1802 Plain Twp Pittsburg Ave 5,150 9,689 F

1235-1234 Jackson Twp PITTSBURG 5,100 10,087 E

1237-1238 North Canton APPLEGROVE 10,500 12,917 E

1237-3099 Jackson Twp APPLEGROVE 8,450 11,136 E



Congested-Highway Sections - 2019 Traffic on 2019 Network


Existing

1-Way AADT

Model-Assigned

1-Way Volume LOS



1244-1263 North Canton MAIN 6,700 8,462 D


1280-1281 North Canton MAIN 8,100 11,037 E


1283-1285 North Canton GLENWOOD 3,050 7,804 D

1287-1288 Jackson Twp WHIPPLE 12,300 19,497 E

1288-3241 Jackson Twp I-77 Ramp 15,500 16,528 D

1289-1287 NW Canton/Plain Twp WHIPPLE 12,350 25,178 E

1289-3441 NW Canton/Plain Twp WHIPPLE 12,350 29,347 F


1321-1290 Jackson Twp WHIPPLE 12,300 20,421 D

1323-1364 Jackson Twp WOODLAWN 4,650 9,235 D

1333-1334 NW Canton CLEVELAND 12,000 15,035 D

1334-3258 NW Canton US-62 Ramp 10,000 17,641 D

1339-1340 NW Canton 25TH 3,050 8,008 D

1339-3124 NW Canton 25TH 2,700 19,281 F

1340-1339 NW Canton 25TH 3,050 11,617 E

1340-1341 NW Canton 25TH 2,850 7,802 D

1341-1340 NW Canton 25TH 2,850 8,044 D

1341-1342 NW Canton 25TH 2,850 7,819 D

1342-1341 NW Canton 25TH 2,850 8,073 D

1342-1343 NW Canton 25TH 2,850 8,599 D

1343-1342 NW Canton 25TH 2,850 8,038 D

1344-1343 NW Canton FULTON 10,650 13,509 D

1344-1345 NW Canton/Plain Twp FULTON 10,650 9,765 D

1345-1344 NW Canton/Plain Twp FULTON 10,650 14,461 F

1345-1347 NW Canton/Plain Twp SR-687 12,100 16,450 F

1347-1345 NW Canton/Plain Twp SR-687 12,100 12,047 E






1359-1328 NW Canton/Plain Twp SR-687 12,250 17,131 D


1364-1323 Jackson Twp WOODLAWN 4,650 10,488 E


1378-1272 NE Canton SR-43 7,800 8,991 D

1382-1381 NW Canton 25TH 2,700 6,275 E

1383-1382 NW Canton 25TH 2,700 6,275 E

1384-1567 NW Canton HARVARD 1,500 11,617 F

1386-1378 NE Canton SR-43 7,800 8,991 D


Existing

1-Way AADT

Model-Assigned

1-Way Volume LOS


1387-1386 NE Canton SR-43 7,800 8,743 D

1394-1229 NE Canton SR-43 10,750 18,478 E

1396-1394 NW Canton 30TH NW 4,800 10,509 D

1397-1396 NW Canton 30TH NW 4,800 9,776 D


1455-1785 Plain Twp MIDDLEBRANCH 5,500 5,995 D

1466-1467 Plain Twp MARTINDALE 3,350 6,170 D

1467-1394 NE Canton 30TH NW 5,000 16,095 F


1470-1471 NE Canton US-62 19,350 26,210 F

1470-5837 NE Canton US-62 19,350 24,548 F

1471-1470 NE Canton US-62 19,350 24,153 E

1471-1472 NE Canton US-62 19,350 26,210 F

1472-1471 NE Canton US-62 19,350 24,153 E

1472-1485 NE Canton US-62 19,350 26,038 D

1484-1486 NE Canton US-62 21,000 21,827 E

1484-5964 NE Canton US-62 17,900 22,318 E

1485-1472 NE Canton US-62 19,350 24,128 D

1485-1486 NE Canton US-62 19,350 22,347 D

1486-1484 NE Canton US-62 21,000 22,318 E

1486-1485 NE Canton US-62 19,350 21,664 D

1487-5964 NE Canton US-62 17,900 19,577 E

1487-6830 NE Canton US-62 17,100 20,177 D

1554-5906 Louisville/Nimishillen Twp US-62 10,550 12,080 E

1556-5906 Louisville/Nimishillen Twp CALIFORNIA 4,950 5,815 D



1572-3271 NE Canton US-62 13,200 17,093 D

1572-6830 NE Canton US-62 13,200 16,830 D






1793-1230 Jackson Twp MOUNT PLEASANT 4,650 9,486 E



1814-1955 Perry Twp ERIE 13,050 12,533 E

1814-1956 Perry Twp ERIE 13,050 12,856 E

1824-2018 Downtown Massillon ERIE 2,350 3,741 D

1952-4027 Bethlehem Twp ERIE 5,750 10,919 D

1955-1814 Perry Twp ERIE 13,050 11,520 E

1956-1814 Perry Twp ERIE 13,050 13,788 E


Existing

1-Way AADT

Model-Assigned

1-Way Volume LOS


2026-2027 NE Massillon ERIE 2,350 3,608 D


2055-2056 NE Massillon WALES 4,850 7,133 D


2065-2064 NE Massillon WALES 5,850 9,509 E

2148-3130 Perry Twp PERRY 5,700 9,579 D

2150-2148 Perry Twp PERRY 5,700 9,116 D

2152-6861 Perry Twp LEONARD 100 7,273 F

2179-3130 Perry Twp PERRY 5,700 9,208 D

2182-2392 SW Canton RAFF 7,250 7,643 E

2185-2442 SW Canton Bolivar Rd 2,100 13,156 F

2185-3103 SW Canton Timken Place 750 5,685 D

2186-2187 SW Canton SR-800 4,200 17,833 F

2187-2188 SW Canton SR-800 4,200 14,698 F

2188-2444 Southern Canton Twp SR-800 8,650 14,798 F

2211-2212 NW Canton 13TH 4,450 13,691 F

2212-2245 NW Canton 13TH 4,450 14,227 F



2245-2574 NW Canton 13TH 6,300 15,058 F

2245-3432 NW Canton HARRISON 4,800 10,779 E

2259-2290 NW Canton BROAD 1,750 4,962 D

2276-2275 Perry Twp SR-172 11,200 16,072 D

2295-2294 NW Canton SR-172 12,750 15,417 D

2295-2296 NW Canton SR-172 11,850 16,237 D

2295-2298 SW Canton HARRISON 2,450 9,008 E

2296-2525 NW Canton SR-172 11,850 12,118 E

2297-2523 SW Canton DEUBER 3,500 12,244 D

2298-2295 SW Canton HARRISON 2,450 6,425 D



2300-2301 SW Canton 6TH SW 1,200 4,581 D

2301-2300 SW Canton 6TH SW 1,200 9,819 F

2301-2304 SW Canton 6TH SW 1,200 4,684 D


2304-2301 SW Canton 6TH SW 1,200 9,848 F

2304-2305 SW Canton 6TH SW 1,000 10,993 F

2305-2304 SW Canton 6TH SW 1,000 13,545 F

2306-2308 SW Canton 6TH SW 650 4,547 D

2306-3521 SW Canton 6TH SW 1,000 8,754 F

2308-2306 SW Canton 6TH SW 650 5,025 D

2308-2309 SW Canton 6TH SW 650 4,547 D

2309-2288 SW Canton MARYLAND 1,650 5,903 E


Existing

1-Way AADT

Model-Assigned

1-Way Volume LOS


2309-2308 SW Canton 6TH SW 650 5,025 D

2311-2309 SW Canton 6TH SW 450 4,670 D

2318-2319 SW Canton CLARENDON 350 6,561 E

2319-2320 SW Canton 9TH SW 2,600 4,342 D

2319-6017 SW Canton CLARENDON 100 9,781 F


2392-2182 SW Canton RAFF 7,250 7,162 E

2428-2427 Southern Canton Twp SR-800 4,650 9,721 D

2440-2441 Southern Canton Twp SR-800 8,650 11,433 E




2443-2186 SW Canton CLEVELAND 4,200 14,037 D



2516-2515 NW Canton SR-172 12,500 10,362 D

2517-2516 NW Canton SR-172 7,650 10,362 D

2520-2517 NW Canton SR-172 12,500 10,362 D


2524-2525 NW Canton SR-172 7,650 20,508 E

2552-2606 NE Canton SR-153 6,500 7,442 E

2569-2571 NW Canton 12TH 3,800 10,005 D

2571-2572 NW Canton 12TH 3,800 9,872 D

2572-2573 NW Canton 12TH 7,850 10,277 D

2573-2572 NW Canton 12TH 7,850 9,042 D

2573-2574 NW Canton 13TH 7,850 20,808 F

2574-2245 NW Canton 13TH 6,300 13,713 F

2574-2573 NW Canton 13TH 7,850 19,504 F

2605-2606 NE Canton SR-153 6,500 9,424 D

2606-2552 NE Canton SR-153 6,500 9,679 F

2661-4047 SE Canton SR-43 6,600 11,094 F

2691-2692 Eastern Canton Twp SR-43 5,500 7,166 D





2763-2766 Osnaburg Twp US-30 4,150 7,479 E

2766-2763 Osnaburg Twp US-30 4,150 6,921 D

2766-2769 Osnaburg Twp US-30 4,150 7,476 E

2769-2766 Osnaburg Twp US-30 4,150 6,887 D

2769-2770 Osnaburg Twp US-30 3,300 6,611 E

2770-2769 Osnaburg Twp US-30 3,300 6,380 E

2771-2772 Osnaburg Twp US-30 5,550 9,138 D


Existing

1-Way AADT

Model-Assigned

1-Way Volume LOS


2772-2771 Osnaburg Twp US-30 5,550 9,274 E

2772-2773 Osnaburg Twp US-30 5,550 9,539 D

2773-2772 Osnaburg Twp US-30 5,550 9,809 D

2773-2775 Osnaburg Twp US-30 5,550 9,497 D

2775-2773 Osnaburg Twp US-30 5,550 9,825 D

2775-2777 Osnaburg Twp US-30 5,550 10,409 E

2777-2775 Osnaburg Twp US-30 5,550 10,575 E

2881-2880 NW Canton SHORB 2,850 3,118 D

3031-3057 Downtown Canton Walnut Ave SE 1,050 9,711 F

3037-3038 Downtown Canton 4TH SE 400 4,178 E

3055-3058 Downtown Canton Walnut Ave SE 4,600 8,209 D

3057-3055 Downtown Canton Walnut Ave SE 4,600 7,923 D

3099-1237 Jackson Twp APPLEGROVE 8,450 10,542 D


3124-1339 NW Canton 25TH 2,700 17,872 F

3130-2148 Perry Twp PERRY 5,700 9,489 D

3130-2179 Perry Twp PERRY 5,700 9,286 D

3133-3680 Lake Twp MOGADORE 1,350 4,341 D





3247-3245 NW Canton/Plain Twp US-62/I-77 Ramp 8,600 17,612 D


3251-3257 NW Canton/Plain Twp I-77/US-62 Ramp 8,600 20,264 E

3252-3257 NW Canton/Plain Twp US-62 17,900 22,780 E


3256-3363 NW Canton I-77 45,200 65,154 D

3257-3259 NW Canton US-62 26,500 43,044 D

3258-3247 NW Canton US-62 26,500 44,921 D



3271-6833 NE Canton US-62 13,200 17,093 D

3272-1572 NE Canton US-62 13,200 16,871 D

3279-3380 Plain Twp US-62 14,200 15,946 F

3280-3380 Plain Twp US-62 12,650 14,880 D

3328-1956 Perry Twp ERIE 13,050 13,788 D

3364-3255 NW Canton I-77 45,200 68,461 D

3366-3367 NW Canton I-77 41,350 68,249 D

3367-3368 NW Canton I-77 41,350 68,249 D

3368-2295 NW Canton I-77 Ramp 4,000 21,689 E

3369-3365 NW Canton I-77 41,350 65,812 D

3380-3279 Plain Twp US-62 14,200 15,749 F


Existing

1-Way AADT

Model-Assigned

1-Way Volume LOS


3380-3280 Plain Twp US-62 12,650 15,106 D

3427-5832 Jackson Twp SHUFFEL 7,700 14,563 D






3452-3468 SW Canton I-77 Ramp 7,500 17,238 D






3585-3467 SW Canton I-77/US-30 Ramp 8,000 15,824 D

3623-3624 Lake Twp SR-619 6,500 9,078 E

3624-3623 Lake Twp SR-619 6,500 9,249 E

3624-3680 Lake Twp SR-619 5,950 8,637 E

3651-3652 Lake Twp CLEVELAND 6,100 11,858 E

3651-3668 Lake Twp CLEVELAND 5,550 8,934 D






3680-3624 Lake Twp SR-619 5,950 9,545 F


3736-3737 Bethlehem Twp MAIN 4,600 9,133 D



3988-4114 Jackson Twp FRANK 5,700 9,503 D


4010-3148 Jackson Twp WISE 1,750 4,900 D







4114-1222 Jackson Twp FRANK 5,700 9,503 D




4166-3099 Jackson Twp APPLEGROVE 8,450 9,914 D


Existing

1-Way AADT

Model-Assigned

1-Way Volume LOS



5837-1470 NE Canton US-62 19,350 27,484 F


5906-1556 Louisville/Nimishillen Twp CALIFORNIA 4,950 6,019 D

5906-5907 Louisville/Nimishillen Twp US-62 12,650 14,880 D


5964-1484 NE Canton US-62 17,900 21,827 E

5964-1487 NE Canton US-62 17,900 20,177 E

6015-1037 Canal Fulton/Lawrence Twp LOCUST 1,000 5,490 D

6015-1040 Canal Fulton/Lawrence Twp MARKET 1,000 5,682 D


6034-951 SW Alliance US-62 10,400 11,701 E


6694-1165 Jackson Twp STRIP 3,900 12,554 F

6830-1487 NE Canton US-62 17,100 18,318 D

6830-1572 NE Canton US-62 13,200 17,052 D

6833-6838 NE Canton US-62 13,200 17,093 D

6834-3272 NE Canton US-62 13,200 16,871 D

6837-6839 Plain Twp US-62 14,200 16,695 D

6838-6834 Plain Twp US-62 13,200 16,871 D

6838-6839 NE Canton US-62 13,200 17,093 F

6839-6837 NE Canton US-62 14,200 16,967 D

6839-6838 Plain Twp US-62 13,200 16,871 F


886-885 SE Alliance SR-183 5,400 8,802 D

947-950 SW Alliance US-62 11,650 13,793 F

950-947 SW Alliance US-62 11,650 13,830 F

950-951 SW Alliance US-62 10,400 12,827 E

951-6034 SW Alliance US-62 10,400 13,701 F

951-950 SW Alliance US-62 10,400 13,387 E

953-958 SE Alliance US-62 9,350 13,494 E

958-953 SE Alliance US-62 9,350 12,624 E

958-959 SE Alliance US-62 9,350 8,934 D

LINK Location Street Name

Existing

1-Way AADT

Model-Assigned

1-Way Volume LOS1037-6015 Canal Fulton/Lawrence Twp LOCUST 1,000 7,985 E



1088-1123 Jackson Twp PORTAGE 6,000 11,931 F

1093-1094 Jackson Twp WALES 6,550 9,624 D

1094-1096 Jackson Twp WALES 6,550 9,484 D

1117-3152 Jackson Twp MUDBROOK 100 4,731 D





1135-1166 Jackson Twp FRANK 6,450 13,181 F



1158-4009 Jackson Twp WAYVIEW 4,400 9,342 E

1159-4166 Jackson Twp WAYVIEW 4,650 9,756 E















1187-1292 Jackson Twp DRESSLER 9,600 23,238 E







1204-1037 Canal Fulton/Lawrence Twp MANCHESTER 3,400 8,843 D

1208-4111 Lake Twp MOUNT PLEASANT 2,050 4,692 D

1218-1289 NW Canton/Plain Twp I-77 Ramp 3,100 22,792 E




Congested Highway Sections - 2040 Traffic on 2019 Network


Existing

1-Way AADT

Model-Assigned

1-Way Volume LOS



1229-1393 NE Canton SR-43 10,750 10,775 D










1235-1234 Jackson Twp PITTSBURG 5,100 11,903 F

1237-1238 North Canton APPLEGROVE 10,500 14,468 F











1257-1258 North Canton MAPLE 2,750 6,533 D



1272-1378 NE Canton SR-43 7,800 8,947 D





1283-1285 North Canton GLENWOOD 3,050 9,427 E










1312-1337 NW Canton US-62 Ramp 100 16,590 D



Existing

1-Way AADT

Model-Assigned

1-Way Volume LOS





1333-1334 NW Canton CLEVELAND 12,000 18,353 E

1334-3258 NW Canton US-62 Ramp 100 19,852 E

1339-1340 NW Canton 25TH 3,050 8,570 D

1339-3124 NW Canton 25TH 2,700 21,322 F

1340-1339 NW Canton 25TH 3,050 12,282 E

1340-1341 NW Canton 25TH 2,850 8,139 D

1341-1340 NW Canton 25TH 2,850 8,187 D

1341-1342 NW Canton 25TH 2,850 8,284 D

1342-1341 NW Canton 25TH 2,850 8,428 D

1342-1343 NW Canton 25TH 2,850 9,121 E

1343-1342 NW Canton 25TH 2,850 8,366 D


















1378-1272 NE Canton SR-43 7,800 10,273 D

1378-1386 NE Canton SR-43 7,800 8,947 D

1382-1381 NW Canton 25TH 2,700 7,823 F

1383-1382 NW Canton 25TH 2,700 7,823 F

1383-1385 NW Canton 25TH 2,700 6,137 D


1385-1383 NW Canton 25TH 2,700 6,024 D

1385-1387 NW Canton 25TH 2,700 6,016 D

1386-1378 NE Canton SR-43 7,800 10,273 D

1386-1387 NE Canton SR-43 7,800 8,869 D

1387-1385 NW Canton 25TH 2,700 6,179 D

1387-1386 NE Canton SR-43 7,800 10,091 D


Existing

1-Way AADT

Model-Assigned

1-Way Volume LOS


1394-1229 NE Canton SR-43 10,750 21,548 E

1394-1396 NW Canton 30TH NW 4,800 8,888 D

1396-1394 NW Canton 30TH NW 4,800 11,648 E

1397-1396 NW Canton 30TH NW 4,800 11,124 E


1424-1425 Plain Twp SCHNEIDER 1,950 5,594 D


1433-4161 Plain Twp APPLEGROVE 2,200 5,591 D


1436-1435 Lake Twp MOUNT PLEASANT 2,050 5,666 E




1467-1394 NE Canton 30TH NW 5,000 17,055 F


1470-1471 NE Canton US-62 19,350 30,992 F

1470-5837 NE Canton US-62 19,350 29,006 F

1471-1470 NE Canton US-62 19,350 28,600 F

1471-1472 NE Canton US-62 19,350 30,992 F

1472-1471 NE Canton US-62 19,350 28,600 F

1472-1485 NE Canton US-62 19,350 30,713 E

1484-1486 NE Canton US-62 21,000 25,276 F

1484-5964 NE Canton US-62 17,900 26,509 F

1485-1472 NE Canton US-62 19,350 28,437 E

1485-1486 NE Canton US-62 19,350 26,455 E

1485-3934 NE Canton HARRISBURG #N/A 6,325 D

1486-1484 NE Canton US-62 21,000 26,509 F

1486-1485 NE Canton US-62 19,350 25,183 E

1487-5964 NE Canton US-62 17,900 22,712 E

1487-6830 NE Canton US-62 17,100 24,211 E

1554-5906 Louisville/Nimishillen Twp US-62 10,550 15,127 F

1556-5906 Louisville/Nimishillen Twp CALIFORNIA 4,950 6,474 E



1572-3271 NE Canton US-62 13,200 20,712 D

1572-6830 NE Canton US-62 13,200 19,626 E

1632-1633 Louisville/Nimishillen Twp SR-153 4,350 7,786 D








Existing

1-Way AADT

Model-Assigned

1-Way Volume LOS






1793-1230 Jackson Twp MOUNT PLEASANT 4,650 9,354 E



1814-1955 Perry Twp ERIE 13,050 16,125 F

1814-1956 Perry Twp ERIE 13,050 16,174 F

1824-2018 Downtown Massillon ERIE 2,350 4,569 E

1952-4027 Bethlehem Twp ERIE 5,750 13,842 E

1955-1814 Perry Twp ERIE 13,050 14,571 F

1956-1814 Perry Twp ERIE 13,050 17,642 F

1956-3327 Perry Twp ERIE 13,050 16,174 D

1965-2111 Perry Twp RICHVILLE 4,350 6,331 D


2024-2025 NE Massillon CHERRY 2,800 3,905 D



2027-1824 NE Massillon ERIE 2,350 4,569 E








2143-2179 Perry Twp PERRY 5,700 9,340 D

2146-2145 Perry Twp GENOA 3,900 5,422 D

2148-2150 Perry Twp PERRY 5,700 9,071 D

2148-3130 Perry Twp PERRY 5,700 10,603 D

2150-2148 Perry Twp PERRY 5,700 10,467 D


2161-2162 Perry Twp PERRY 5,100 6,909 D

2162-2163 Perry Twp PERRY 5,400 6,568 D

2163-2162 Perry Twp PERRY 5,400 6,064 D

2179-2143 Perry Twp PERRY 5,700 9,236 D

2179-3130 Perry Twp PERRY 5,700 10,442 D

2182-2392 SW Canton RAFF 7,250 8,710 E


2185-3103 SW Canton Timken Place 750 6,213 E

2186-2187 SW Canton SR-800 4,200 19,697 F

2187-2188 SW Canton SR-800 4,200 16,751 F


Existing

1-Way AADT

Model-Assigned

1-Way Volume LOS



2193-2771 Osnaburg Twp US-30 7,250 9,336 D

2211-2212 NW Canton 13TH 4,450 16,241 F

2212-2211 NW Canton 13TH 4,450 9,761 D

2212-2245 NW Canton 13TH 4,450 16,638 F




2245-2212 NW Canton 13TH 4,450 9,969 D

2245-2574 NW Canton 13TH 6,300 17,627 F


2259-2290 NW Canton BROAD 1,750 5,383 D

2275-2276 Perry Twp SR-172 11,200 16,163 D

2276-2275 Perry Twp SR-172 11,200 18,200 D

2276-2277 Perry Twp SR-172 11,200 16,247 D

2277-2276 Perry Twp SR-172 11,200 16,103 D

2286-2284 NW Canton SR-172 12,750 18,601 D

2291-2306 SW Canton DARTMOUTH 1,150 5,366 D

2295-2294 NW Canton SR-172 12,750 18,067 E

2295-2296 NW Canton SR-172 11,850 17,625 E


2296-2525 NW Canton SR-172 11,850 13,586 E





2300-2301 SW Canton 6TH SW 1,200 5,632 E

2301-2300 SW Canton 6TH SW 1,200 10,295 F

2301-2304 SW Canton 6TH SW 1,200 5,757 E


2304-2301 SW Canton 6TH SW 1,200 10,345 F

2304-2305 SW Canton 6TH SW 1,000 11,289 F

2305-2304 SW Canton 6TH SW 1,000 15,561 F

2306-3521 SW Canton 6TH SW 1,000 9,590 F

2308-2306 SW Canton 6TH SW 650 4,918 D

2309-2308 SW Canton 6TH SW 650 4,918 D

2311-2286 SW Canton BELLFLOWER 700 5,551 D

2311-2309 SW Canton 6TH SW 450 4,240 D


2318-2329 SW Canton CLARENDON 350 5,740 D


2319-2320 SW Canton 9TH SW 2,600 4,284 D



Existing

1-Way AADT

Model-Assigned

1-Way Volume LOS


2327-2328 SW Canton 11TH 1,950 5,141 D

2328-2329 SW Canton 11TH 1,950 5,050 D


2339-2338 Perry Twp WHIPPLE 2,000 5,333 D

2342-2341 Perry Twp 13TH SW 2,300 4,340 D







2392-2182 SW Canton RAFF 7,250 8,191 E















2458-2460 South-Central Canton CHERRY 3,000 7,944 E

2460-2464 South-Central Canton CHERRY 3,000 7,992 E

2489-2487 South-Central Canton SR-43 5,300 9,822 D


2516-2515 NW Canton SR-172 12,500 12,277 E

2517-2516 NW Canton SR-172 7,650 12,277 E

2520-2517 NW Canton SR-172 12,500 12,277 E


2524-2525 NW Canton SR-172 7,650 21,735 E

2552-2606 NE Canton SR-153 6,500 8,599 E

2569-2571 NW Canton 12TH 3,800 11,489 D

2571-2569 NW Canton 12TH 3,800 10,719 D

2571-2572 NW Canton 12TH 3,800 11,366 D

2572-2571 NW Canton 12TH 3,800 10,552 D

2572-2573 NW Canton 12TH 7,850 11,757 E

2573-2572 NW Canton 12TH 7,850 10,765 E

2573-2574 NW Canton 13TH 7,850 22,598 F


Existing

1-Way AADT

Model-Assigned

1-Way Volume LOS


2574-2245 NW Canton 13TH 6,300 14,192 F

2574-2573 NW Canton 13TH 7,850 21,560 F

2605-2606 NE Canton SR-153 6,500 9,925 D

2606-2552 NE Canton SR-153 6,500 10,203 F

2661-4047 SE Canton SR-43 6,600 11,993 F

2691-2692 Eastern Canton Twp SR-43 5,500 8,418 E







2763-2766 Osnaburg Twp US-30 4,150 10,846 F

2766-2763 Osnaburg Twp US-30 4,150 8,198 E

2766-2769 Osnaburg Twp US-30 4,150 10,892 F

2769-2766 Osnaburg Twp US-30 4,150 8,162 E

2769-2770 Osnaburg Twp US-30 3,300 9,789 F

2770-2193 Osnaburg Twp US-30 7,250 9,309 D

2770-2769 Osnaburg Twp US-30 3,300 8,051 F

2771-2767 Osnaburg Twp US-30 1,900 4,645 D

2771-2772 Osnaburg Twp US-30 5,550 12,064 F

2772-2771 Osnaburg Twp US-30 5,550 11,476 E

2772-2773 Osnaburg Twp US-30 5,550 12,527 E

2773-2772 Osnaburg Twp US-30 5,550 12,132 E

2773-2775 Osnaburg Twp US-30 5,550 12,523 E

2775-2773 Osnaburg Twp US-30 5,550 12,172 E

2775-2777 Osnaburg Twp US-30 5,550 13,539 F

2777-2775 Osnaburg Twp US-30 5,550 13,025 F

2777-2778 Osnaburg Twp US-30 7,600 13,248 D

2778-2779 Osnaburg Twp US-30 7,600 13,368 D

2779-2704 Osnaburg Twp US-30 7,600 13,368 D

2804-6773 Lexington Twp BEESON 3,050 6,067 D


2814-2835 Downtown Canton SR-43D 6,500 9,359 D


2880-2881 NW Canton SHORB 2,850 2,523 D

2881-2880 NW Canton SHORB 2,850 3,963 E

2916-2900 Downtown Canton MARKET 2,850 5,140 D

2983-2985 Paris Twp/Minerva SR-183 2,900 10,565 D

2985-3005 Paris Twp/Minerva SR-183 3,400 11,200 E

2986-2989 Paris Twp/Minerva MARKET 1,450 9,040 D

2989-2990 Paris Twp/Minerva MARKET 1,450 9,040 D

2990-2991 Paris Twp/Minerva US-30 4,050 9,990 D


Existing

1-Way AADT

Model-Assigned

1-Way Volume LOS


2991-2992 Paris Twp/Minerva US-30 4,050 9,583 D

2992-2993 Paris Twp/Minerva US-30 3,550 9,951 E

3005-2985 Paris Twp/Minerva SR-183 3,400 8,841 D

3005-2986 Paris Twp/Minerva MARKET 1,450 8,968 F

3016-1599 Jackson Twp MUNSON 3,500 6,467 D

3017-4138 Jackson Twp UNIVERSITY 3,500 10,366 D

3031-3057 Downtown Canton SR-43D 1,050 11,245 F

3037-3038 Downtown Canton 4TH SE 400 4,843 F


3055-3058 Downtown Canton SR-43D 4,600 9,775 E


3057-3055 Downtown Canton SR-43D 4,600 9,432 E



3099-1237 Jackson Twp APPLEGROVE 8,450 14,011 F


3104-2185 SW Canton I-77 Ramp 2,550 15,851 D

3124-1339 NW Canton 25TH 2,700 18,367 F

3130-2148 Perry Twp PERRY 5,700 10,707 D

3130-2179 Perry Twp PERRY 5,700 10,326 D

3132-3622 Lake Twp SR-619 5,900 9,742 D

3133-3680 Lake Twp MOGADORE 1,350 5,696 E





3244-5838 NW Canton/Plain Twp I-77 42,200 68,161 D

3247-3245 NW Canton/Plain Twp US-62/I-77 Ramp 8,600 20,676 E



3252-3257 NW Canton/Plain Twp US-62 17,900 26,599 F



3256-3363 NW Canton I-77 45,200 75,875 D

3257-3259 NW Canton US-62 26,500 50,995 D

3258-3247 NW Canton US-62 26,500 52,746 D






3271-6833 NE Canton US-62 13,200 20,712 D

3272-1572 NE Canton US-62 13,200 19,704 E


Existing

1-Way AADT

Model-Assigned

1-Way Volume LOS


3273-3275 Plain Twp US-62 14,200 19,836 D

3274-6835 Plain Twp US-62 14,200 19,549 D

3275-5903 Plain Twp US-62 14,200 19,836 D

3276-3274 Plain Twp US-62 14,200 19,549 D

3277-3383 Plain Twp US-62 14,200 18,772 D

3278-5902 Plain Twp US-62 14,200 18,477 D

3279-3380 Plain Twp US-62 14,200 18,772 F

3279-3385 Plain Twp US-62 14,200 18,477 D

3280-3380 Plain Twp US-62 12,650 17,906 E

3328-1956 Perry Twp ERIE 13,050 17,642 E

3363-3366 NW Canton I-77 38,350 69,273 D

3364-3255 NW Canton I-77 45,200 80,150 D

3365-3364 NW Canton I-77 39,350 66,862 D

3366-3367 NW Canton I-77 41,350 78,124 D

3367-3368 NW Canton I-77 41,350 78,124 D

3368-2295 NW Canton I-77 Ramp 4,000 23,650 E

3369-3365 NW Canton I-77 41,350 75,678 D

3380-3279 Plain Twp US-62 14,200 18,477 F

3380-3280 Plain Twp US-62 12,650 18,379 E

3382-3278 Plain Twp US-62 14,200 18,477 D

3383-3384 Plain Twp US-62 14,200 18,772 D

3384-3279 Plain Twp US-62 14,200 18,772 D

3385-3382 Plain Twp US-62 14,200 18,477 D

3398-3650 Lake Twp STATE 3,200 6,663 D







3452-3468 SW Canton I-77 Ramp 7,500 19,760 E

3468-3104 SW Canton I-77 Ramp 2,550 15,851 D




3537-3539 Jackson Twp I-77 Ramp 5,400 22,562 E




3585-3467 SW Canton I-77/US-30 Ramp 8,000 21,601 E

3622-3132 Lake Twp SR-619 5,900 9,155 D

3622-3680 Lake Twp SR-619 5,900 8,971 D

3623-3624 Lake Twp SR-619 6,500 11,602 F


Existing

1-Way AADT

Model-Assigned

1-Way Volume LOS


3623-3625 Lake Twp SR-619 6,500 10,489 D

3624-3623 Lake Twp SR-619 6,500 11,752 F

3624-3680 Lake Twp SR-619 5,950 11,648 F

3625-3623 Lake Twp SR-619 6,500 10,293 D

3626-6021 Lake Twp LAKE CENTER 250 4,127 D

3634-3636 Lake Twp SR-43 2,850 5,666 D

3636-3634 Lake Twp SR-43 2,850 5,020 D


3650-3398 Lake Twp STATE 3,200 6,623 D

3651-3398 Lake Twp STATE 3,200 5,804 D

3651-3652 Lake Twp CLEVELAND 6,100 15,159 F








3680-3622 Lake Twp SR-619 5,900 9,423 D

3680-3624 Lake Twp SR-619 5,950 12,600 F




3736-3737 Bethlehem Twp MAIN 4,600 11,969 E



3879-3878 Pike Twp SR-800 3,100 5,937 D


















Existing

1-Way AADT

Model-Assigned

1-Way Volume LOS



4113-4135 Mahoning County JENNINGS 50 4,764 D








5832-3427 Jackson Twp SHUFFEL 7,700 18,027 E


5837-1470 NE Canton US-62 19,350 32,251 F

5902-3276 Plain Twp US-62 14,200 19,549 D

5903-3277 Plain Twp US-62 14,200 18,772 D





5964-1484 NE Canton US-62 17,900 25,276 F

5964-1487 NE Canton US-62 17,900 24,211 F

6015-1037 Canal Fulton/Lawrence Twp LOCUST 1,000 6,127 D

6015-1040 Canal Fulton/Lawrence Twp MARKET 1,000 6,521 E



6034-951 SW Alliance US-62 10,400 11,687 E






6739-6738 Lexington Twp SR-225 3,850 10,594 D

6771-888 SE Alliance SR-183 5,250 9,116 D



6830-1487 NE Canton US-62 17,100 21,294 E

6830-1572 NE Canton US-62 13,200 20,634 E

6833-6838 NE Canton US-62 13,200 20,712 D

6834-3272 NE Canton US-62 13,200 19,704 E

6835-6837 Plain Twp US-62 14,200 19,549 D

6836-3273 NE Canton US-62 14,200 19,836 D

6837-6836 NE Canton US-62 14,200 19,836 D

6837-6839 Plain Twp US-62 14,200 19,549 E

6838-6834 Plain Twp US-62 13,200 19,704 E


Existing

1-Way AADT

Model-Assigned

1-Way Volume LOS


6838-6839 NE Canton US-62 13,200 20,712 F

6839-6837 NE Canton US-62 14,200 19,836 E

6839-6838 Plain Twp US-62 13,200 19,704 F


6868-6866 NE Massillon 23RD 100 3,938 D

805-807 NE Alliance SR-225 2,250 7,450 D

885-3413 SE Alliance SR-183 5,100 10,214 D

885-886 SE Alliance SR-183 5,400 9,285 D

886-885 SE Alliance SR-183 5,400 10,178 D

886-887 SE Alliance SR-183 5,400 9,376 D

887-886 SE Alliance SR-183 5,400 9,308 D

889-6771 SE Alliance SR-183 5,250 8,455 D

947-950 SW Alliance US-62 11,650 13,845 F

950-947 SW Alliance US-62 11,650 13,616 F

950-951 SW Alliance US-62 10,400 12,809 E

951-6034 SW Alliance US-62 10,400 13,660 F

951-950 SW Alliance US-62 10,400 13,364 E

953-958 SE Alliance US-62 9,350 13,293 E

958-953 SE Alliance US-62 9,350 12,494 E

980-6773 Lexington Twp BEESON 3,950 6,973 E



Existing

1-Way AADT

Model-Assigned

1-Way Volume LOS1037-1204 Canal Fulton/Lawrence Twp MANCHESTER 3,400 9,092 D


1051-3126 Canal Fulton/Lawrence Twp PORTAGE 4,550 7,819 D



1117-3152 Jackson Twp MUDBROOK 100 4,611 D

























1229-1393 NE Canton SR-43 10,750 10,638 D








1234-3954 Jackson Twp PITTSBURG 5,150 15,472 E







Existing

1-Way AADT

Model-Assigned

1-Way Volume LOS










1272-1378 NE Canton SR-43 7,800 9,153 D





















1333-1334 NW Canton CLEVELAND 12,000 19,297 E

1334-3258 NW Canton US-62 Ramp 100 21,069 E

1337-1336 NW Canton CLEVELAND 12,000 18,473 D

1339-1340 NW Canton 25TH 3,050 8,260 D

1339-3124 NW Canton 25TH 2,700 21,467 F

1340-1339 NW Canton 25TH 3,050 12,540 F

1340-1341 NW Canton 25TH 2,850 7,883 D

1341-1340 NW Canton 25TH 2,850 8,166 D

1341-1342 NW Canton 25TH 2,850 8,049 D

1342-1341 NW Canton 25TH 2,850 8,404 D

1342-1343 NW Canton 25TH 2,850 8,910 E

1343-1342 NW Canton 25TH 2,850 8,352 D




Existing

1-Way AADT

Model-Assigned

1-Way Volume LOS


















1378-1272 NE Canton SR-43 7,800 10,234 D

1378-1386 NE Canton SR-43 7,800 9,153 D

1382-1381 NW Canton 25TH 2,700 8,245 F

1383-1382 NW Canton 25TH 2,700 8,245 F


1385-1383 NW Canton 25TH 2,700 6,285 D

1386-1378 NE Canton SR-43 7,800 10,234 D

1386-1387 NE Canton SR-43 7,800 9,069 D

1387-1385 NW Canton 25TH 2,700 6,379 D

1387-1386 NE Canton SR-43 7,800 10,111 D

1394-1229 NE Canton SR-43 10,750 21,473 E

1396-1394 NW Canton 30TH NW 4,800 12,407 E

1397-1396 NW Canton 30TH NW 4,800 11,649 E










1467-1394 NE Canton 30TH NW 5,000 16,543 F


1470-1471 NE Canton US-62 19,350 29,859 F

1470-5837 NE Canton US-62 19,350 27,230 F

1471-1470 NE Canton US-62 19,350 26,650 F


Existing

1-Way AADT

Model-Assigned

1-Way Volume LOS


1471-1472 NE Canton US-62 19,350 29,859 F

1472-1471 NE Canton US-62 19,350 26,650 F

1472-1485 NE Canton US-62 19,350 29,704 F

1484-1486 NE Canton US-62 21,000 26,132 D

1484-5964 NE Canton US-62 17,900 25,349 D

1485-1472 NE Canton US-62 19,350 25,436 F

1485-1486 NE Canton US-62 19,350 25,472 F

1486-1484 NE Canton US-62 21,000 25,349 D

1486-1485 NE Canton US-62 19,350 26,046 F

1487-5964 NE Canton US-62 17,900 23,341 D

1487-6830 NE Canton US-62 17,100 22,846 E

1492-1534 NE Canton LESH 1,100 4,418 D





1572-3271 NE Canton US-62 13,200 19,870 E

1572-6830 NE Canton US-62 13,200 20,397 E

1751-3396 Plain Twp NEW WHIPPLE NA 7,214 E












1814-1955 Perry Twp ERIE 13,050 17,216 F

1814-1956 Perry Twp ERIE 13,050 17,230 F



1955-1814 Perry Twp ERIE 13,050 15,685 F

1956-1814 Perry Twp ERIE 13,050 18,698 F

1956-3327 Perry Twp ERIE 13,050 17,230 E








Existing

1-Way AADT

Model-Assigned

1-Way Volume LOS




2096-2095 Perry Twp JACKSON 3,750 5,336 D

2097-2096 Perry Twp JACKSON 3,750 5,421 D


2148-3130 Perry Twp PERRY 5,700 9,561 D

2150-2148 Perry Twp PERRY 5,700 9,149 D


2161-2162 Perry Twp PERRY 5,100 6,622 D

2162-2163 Perry Twp PERRY 5,400 5,875 D


2179-3130 Perry Twp PERRY 5,700 9,221 D

2182-2392 SW Canton RAFF 7,250 7,583 E


2185-3103 SW Canton Timken Place 750 6,276 E

2186-2187 SW Canton SR-800 4,200 19,597 F

2187-2188 SW Canton SR-800 4,200 16,718 F


2211-2212 NW Canton 13TH 4,450 15,900 F

2212-2211 NW Canton 13TH 4,450 10,184 D

2212-2245 NW Canton 13TH 4,450 16,450 F




2245-2212 NW Canton 13TH 4,450 10,410 D

2245-2574 NW Canton 13TH 6,300 16,703 F


2259-2290 NW Canton BROAD 1,750 5,320 D

2276-2275 Perry Twp SR-172 11,200 17,216 D

2276-2277 Perry Twp SR-172 11,200 15,710 D

2286-2284 NW Canton SR-172 12,750 18,435 D

2291-2306 SW Canton DARTMOUTH 1,150 5,662 D

2295-2294 NW Canton SR-172 12,750 18,024 E

2295-2296 NW Canton SR-172 11,850 17,582 E


2296-2525 NW Canton SR-172 11,850 13,008 E





2300-2301 SW Canton 6TH SW 1,200 5,442 E

2301-2300 SW Canton 6TH SW 1,200 10,866 F

2301-2304 SW Canton 6TH SW 1,200 5,567 E


Existing

1-Way AADT

Model-Assigned

1-Way Volume LOS



2304-2301 SW Canton 6TH SW 1,200 10,909 F

2304-2305 SW Canton 6TH SW 1,000 10,794 F

2305-2304 SW Canton 6TH SW 1,000 16,078 F

2306-3521 SW Canton 6TH SW 1,000 10,179 F

2308-2306 SW Canton 6TH SW 650 5,061 D

2309-2308 SW Canton 6TH SW 650 5,061 D

2311-2286 SW Canton BELLFLOWER 700 5,581 D

2317-2315 SW Canton 9TH SW 2,700 5,201 D



2319-2320 SW Canton 9TH SW 2,600 4,718 D


2320-2321 SW Canton 9TH SW 2,600 4,537 D

2327-2328 SW Canton 11TH 1,950 6,035 E

2328-2329 SW Canton 11TH 1,950 5,952 E




2338-2339 Perry Twp WHIPPLE 2,000 6,484 E




2341-3092 Perry Twp WHIPPLE 100 5,766 E






2392-2182 SW Canton RAFF 7,250 7,597 E

2393-2800 Perry Twp SOUTHWAY 4,750 6,574 D














Existing

1-Way AADT

Model-Assigned

1-Way Volume LOS





2458-2460 South-Central Canton CHERRY 3,000 7,317 D

2460-2464 South-Central Canton CHERRY 3,000 7,364 D

2516-2515 NW Canton SR-172 12,500 11,981 E

2517-2516 NW Canton SR-172 7,650 11,981 E

2520-2517 NW Canton SR-172 12,500 11,981 E


2524-2525 NW Canton SR-172 7,650 22,124 E

2552-2606 NE Canton SR-153 6,500 7,990 E

2569-2571 NW Canton 12TH 3,800 11,316 D

2571-2569 NW Canton 12TH 3,800 10,779 D

2571-2572 NW Canton 12TH 3,800 11,196 D

2572-2571 NW Canton 12TH 3,800 10,612 D

2572-2573 NW Canton 12TH 7,850 11,605 E

2573-2572 NW Canton 12TH 7,850 10,831 E

2573-2574 NW Canton 13TH 7,850 22,871 F

2574-2245 NW Canton 13TH 6,300 15,003 F

2574-2573 NW Canton 13TH 7,850 22,083 F

2604-2605 NE Canton SR-153 6,500 8,968 D

2605-2606 NE Canton SR-153 6,500 10,073 D

2606-2552 NE Canton SR-153 6,500 10,374 F

2661-4047 SE Canton SR-43 6,600 10,849 F










2880-2881 NW Canton SHORB 2,850 2,523 D

2881-2880 NW Canton SHORB 2,850 3,801 E

3016-1599 Jackson Twp MUNSON 3,500 6,643 D

3031-3057 Downtown Canton SR-43D 1,050 9,108 F

3037-3038 Downtown Canton 4TH SE 400 4,492 E





3092-2341 Perry Twp WHIPPLE 100 4,230 D


Existing

1-Way AADT

Model-Assigned

1-Way Volume LOS


3092-2800 Perry Twp WHIPPLE NA 5,365 E


3106-2097 Perry Twp 27TH 3,750 5,539 D

3124-1339 NW Canton 25TH 2,700 17,922 F

3130-2148 Perry Twp PERRY 5,700 9,545 D

3130-2179 Perry Twp PERRY 5,700 9,157 D

3133-3680 Lake Twp MOGADORE 1,350 5,452 E










3252-3257 NW Canton/Plain Twp US-62 17,900 26,642 F




3256-3363 NW Canton I-77 45,200 79,196 D

3257-3259 NW Canton US-62 26,500 50,364 D

3258-3247 NW Canton US-62 26,500 53,595 E






3271-6833 NE Canton US-62 13,200 18,308 E

3272-1572 NE Canton US-62 13,200 20,561 E

3273-3275 Plain Twp US-62 14,200 20,725 D

3274-6835 Plain Twp US-62 14,200 17,933 E

3275-5903 Plain Twp US-62 14,200 20,725 D

3276-3274 Plain Twp US-62 14,200 18,988 E

3277-3383 Plain Twp US-62 14,200 18,812 D

3278-5902 Plain Twp US-62 14,200 18,060 D

3279-3380 Plain Twp US-62 14,200 18,812 F

3279-3385 Plain Twp US-62 14,200 18,060 D

3280-3380 Plain Twp US-62 12,650 17,382 D

3328-1956 Perry Twp ERIE 13,050 18,698 E

3363-3366 NW Canton I-77 38,350 72,580 D

3364-3255 NW Canton I-77 45,200 82,122 E

3365-3364 NW Canton I-77 39,350 69,416 D


Existing

1-Way AADT

Model-Assigned

1-Way Volume LOS


3366-3367 NW Canton I-77 41,350 81,994 E

3367-3368 NW Canton I-77 41,350 81,994 E

3368-2295 NW Canton I-77 Ramp 4,000 23,248 E

3369-3365 NW Canton I-77 41,350 79,633 D

3380-3279 Plain Twp US-62 14,200 18,060 F

3380-3280 Plain Twp US-62 12,650 17,710 D

3382-3278 Plain Twp US-62 14,200 18,060 D

3383-3384 Plain Twp US-62 14,200 18,812 D

3384-3279 Plain Twp US-62 14,200 18,812 D

3385-3382 Plain Twp US-62 14,200 18,060 D

3396-1230 Plain Twp WHIPPLE NA 10,698 F

3396-1751 Plain Twp WHIPPLE NA 5,723 D

3398-3650 Lake Twp STATE 3,200 6,664 D

3398-3651 Lake Twp STATE 3,200 5,558 D

3413-885 SE Alliance SR-183 5,100 9,500 D









3452-3468 SW Canton I-77 Ramp 7,500 19,656 E

3467-3372 SW Canton I-77 40,400 67,671 D







3623-3624 Lake Twp SR-619 6,500 11,664 F

3623-3625 Lake Twp SR-619 6,500 10,490 D

3624-3623 Lake Twp SR-619 6,500 11,820 F

3624-3680 Lake Twp SR-619 5,950 11,430 E

3625-3623 Lake Twp SR-619 6,500 10,292 D


3634-3636 Lake Twp SR-43 2,850 5,296 D

3636-3634 Lake Twp SR-43 2,850 5,083 D


3650-3398 Lake Twp STATE 3,200 6,622 D

3651-3398 Lake Twp STATE 3,200 5,843 D

3667-3651 Lake Twp STATE 3,300 5,091 D


Existing

1-Way AADT

Model-Assigned

1-Way Volume LOS




3680-3624 Lake Twp SR-619 5,950 12,818 E







3879-3878 Pike Twp SR-800 3,100 5,947 D

3953-1751 Jackson Twp SHUFFEL 7,800 13,664 F

















5832-3427 Jackson Twp SHUFFEL 7,700 22,032 F


5837-1470 NE Canton US-62 19,350 31,209 F

5902-3276 Plain Twp US-62 14,200 18,988 E

5903-3277 Plain Twp US-62 14,200 18,812 D





5964-1484 NE Canton US-62 17,900 26,132 D

5964-1487 NE Canton US-62 17,900 22,846 D


6015-1040 Canal Fulton/Lawrence Twp MARKET 1,000 6,292 D



6034-951 SW Alliance US-62 10,400 11,491 E


Existing

1-Way AADT

Model-Assigned

1-Way Volume LOS







6771-888 SE Alliance SR-183 5,250 9,497 D


6830-1487 NE Canton US-62 17,100 22,036 E

6830-1572 NE Canton US-62 13,200 19,706 E

6833-6836 NE Canton US-62 13,200 18,308 E

6834-3272 NE Canton US-62 13,200 17,933 E

6835-6834 Plain Twp US-62 14,200 17,933 E

6836-3273 NE Canton US-62 14,200 18,308 E


6868-6866 NE Massillon 23RD 100 4,018 D

885-3413 SE Alliance SR-183 5,100 10,573 D

885-886 SE Alliance SR-183 5,400 9,692 D

886-885 SE Alliance SR-183 5,400 10,570 E

886-887 SE Alliance SR-183 5,400 9,795 D

887-886 SE Alliance SR-183 5,400 9,708 D

889-6771 SE Alliance SR-183 5,250 8,878 D

947-950 SW Alliance US-62 11,650 13,870 F

950-947 SW Alliance US-62 11,650 13,569 F

950-951 SW Alliance US-62 10,400 12,800 E

951-6034 SW Alliance US-62 10,400 13,536 E

951-950 SW Alliance US-62 10,400 13,292 E

953-958 SE Alliance US-62 9,350 13,275 E

958-953 SE Alliance US-62 9,350 12,493 E

Documents

Congestion Management Process Report 2015 · 2016-08-31 · Congestion Management Process Report 2015 Prepared By: Stark County Area Transportation Study (SCATS) 201 Third St. NE,