Congestion Management in Power Systems

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/31/2019 Congestion Management in Power Systems

    1/28

    UPAL SINHA

    SUNOY KR.

    BENTE

    PRITAM SINHA

    ROY

    SAYANTAN

    BHATTACHARJEE

    SHOUVIK

    MUKHERJEE1

  • 7/31/2019 Congestion Management in Power Systems

    2/28

    GENERATOR:SOURCE OF

    ELECTRICAL

    ENERGY

    TRANSMISSIO

    N LINE:TRANSMITTING

    POWER

    LOAD:

    CONSUMINGPOWER

    2

  • 7/31/2019 Congestion Management in Power Systems

    3/28

    3

  • 7/31/2019 Congestion Management in Power Systems

    4/28

    4

  • 7/31/2019 Congestion Management in Power Systems

    5/28

    5

  • 7/31/2019 Congestion Management in Power Systems

    6/28

    6

  • 7/31/2019 Congestion Management in Power Systems

    7/287

  • 7/31/2019 Congestion Management in Power Systems

    8/28

    Limit = 100 MVA

    Limit = 100 MVABus A

    300.0 MW

    25%

    175.00 MW

    25.0 MW

    Rest of

    Electric

    System100%

    100.0 MW

    8

  • 7/31/2019 Congestion Management in Power Systems

    9/289

  • 7/31/2019 Congestion Management in Power Systems

    10/28

    FAIR AND NON-DISCRIMINATORY

    ECONOMICALLY EFFICIENT

    TRANSPARENT AND NON-AMBIGUOUS

    FEASIBLE COMPATIBLE WITH MARKET

    10

  • 7/31/2019 Congestion Management in Power Systems

    11/28

    NET TRANSFERCAPACITY(NTC)

    Represents the best estimate

    limit for physical electricity

    transfer between two areas.

    AVAILABLETRANSFER

    CAPACITY(ATC)

    Transfer capacity remaining

    between two interconnected

    areas for further commercial

    activity over and above already

    committed uses of the

    transmission networks.

    11

  • 7/31/2019 Congestion Management in Power Systems

    12/28

    CURTAILMENT BASED ON PUBLISHED NTCs

    AUCTIONING

    MARKET SPLITTING

    REDISPATCHING

    12

  • 7/31/2019 Congestion Management in Power Systems

    13/28

    When NTCs are used as an upper limit of the available transmissioncapacity, no further capacity can be allocated by TSOs once the limit is

    reached.

    Then the method requires that a mechanism to define the priority for using

    NTCs be implemented.

    ADVANTAGE: No additional costs are incurred, and thus there is no

    allocation or cost allocation mechanism.

    DRAWBACKS: Curtailment of transactions based on NTCs publication

    does not convey any economic incentive. It does not provide incentives to

    TSOs, generators, distributors, traders and therefore does not promote

    efficient trade.

    13

  • 7/31/2019 Congestion Management in Power Systems

    14/28

    The auctioning method is efficient regarding competition :bidsreflect exactly the real market value as perceived by the

    participants, the highest priority for access being granted to the

    one who is ready to pay the highest price.

    ADVANTAGE: The auctioning system allows TSOs to handleconstraints for cross-border trading, without providing any

    physical information except NTC.

    DRAWBACKS:Auctioning raises a transmission risk on long

    or mid-term bilateral contracts (there is no guarantee that theywill be accepted every day)

    14

  • 7/31/2019 Congestion Management in Power Systems

    15/28

    This method consists of splitting apower exchange (PEX) intogeographical bid areas

    Each area has its own pool price :areas downstream of a congestion

    will have a higher pool price, areasupstream of a congestion will have alower pool price

    When the price-demand effect isobserved, demand decreases asprice increases

    ADVANTAGE: On a long-termbasis, customers may react to high

    prices in congested areas bysubstituting other forms of energy toelectricity

    DRAWBACKS: It is not feasible ona large scale

    15

  • 7/31/2019 Congestion Management in Power Systems

    16/28

    Redispatch effectively allowsextending trade through re-optimisation despite physicalboundaries, till there is nogeneration possibilities left toredispatch

    ADVANTAGE: Theadvantage of publishing likelycongestion costs in advance isthat it allows good visibility ofthese issues to all participants.

    DRAWBACKS: Preparing theabove cost curve placessignificant computationaldifficulties on the TSOs

    16

  • 7/31/2019 Congestion Management in Power Systems

    17/28

    17

  • 7/31/2019 Congestion Management in Power Systems

    18/28

    It is assumed that the market knows market limits(NTCs published by TSOs).

    This situation could be supported by any number

    of contracts, but G2, G3 and G4 between them

    can only contract up to 280 MW (2 x 100 MW + 2

    x 40 MW NTC). The access to B-A and B-C

    interconnectors is allocated according to chosen

    priority rules.

    18

  • 7/31/2019 Congestion Management in Power Systems

    19/28

    An efficient market is assumed (the market hasenough information as to adjust generation withrespect of NTCs) with :

    G1 200 MW

    G2 200 MW G3 80 MW

    G4 0 MW

    G5 20 MW

    This situation could be supported by any number ofcontracts.

    Assuming that G2 has contracted with D2 and D3, G3and G4 could be competing in the auction for capacitybetween B and A, and between B and C. G3 could

    obtain 80 MW of capacity in this auction. 19

  • 7/31/2019 Congestion Management in Power Systems

    20/28

    20

  • 7/31/2019 Congestion Management in Power Systems

    21/28

    21

  • 7/31/2019 Congestion Management in Power Systems

    22/28

    22

  • 7/31/2019 Congestion Management in Power Systems

    23/28

    LMPLOCAL MARGINAL PRICES TUT TRANSMISSION USAGE TARIFF

    LMPlossless = EP + CR

    LMP loss= EP + CR + LC EPENERGY PRICE

    CRCONGESTION REVENUE

    LCTRANSMISSION LOSSES COST

    LMP-TUT = EP + CR + LC + TUT

    23

  • 7/31/2019 Congestion Management in Power Systems

    24/28

    24

  • 7/31/2019 Congestion Management in Power Systems

    25/28

    Format-I

    Issue Date: Issue Time: Revision No.

    Corridor/ Date Time Total

    Reliabili

    ty Available

    Control Period Transfer Margin Transfer

    Area Capabili

    ty

    (RM) Capability

    (TTC) (ATC)

    Remarks:

    National /________Regional Load Despatch Centre

    Total Transfer Capability for mmmm ,yyyy

    25

  • 7/31/2019 Congestion Management in Power Systems

    26/28

    Format II

    Congestion Monitoring Display

    dd/mm/yyyy, hh:mm

    Corridor/

    Control Area

    TTC ATC Actual

    National/_________Regional Load Despatch

    Centre

    26

  • 7/31/2019 Congestion Management in Power Systems

    27/28

    Format V

    National/_________Regional Load Despatch Centre

    Notice Number: (LDC/RLDC)/yyyy/mm/. Date: dd/mm/yy Time of Issue:hh:mm

    To

    NOTICE FOR LIFTING OF CONGESTION CHARGE

    Congestion charge on Unscheduled Interchange (UI) energy that was applicable

    w.e.f hh:mm of dd/mm/yyyy vide notice umber.... issued at hh:mm of dd/mm/yyyy

    would be lifted w.e.f time block no. (hh:mm) of dd/mm/yyyy.

    Shift Charge

    Manager

    27

  • 7/31/2019 Congestion Management in Power Systems

    28/28

    28