Collective Efficacy, Conflict & Group Performance over time

GROUP-4Fareen Mansur 133102360Imran Hossain 1321071660Raktim Mojumder 1411872666Md. Nahid Hasan 1320543660Mir Sozzadur Rahman 1311284060

Background of the studyCOLLECTIVE EFFICACY

• What is collective efficacy?

• The importance of collective efficacy

• Collective Efficacy at individual level & group level

• The downside of collective efficacy

• The discrepancy between the belief that collective

efficacy leads to success and the idea that collective

efficacy may cause groups to eventually fail

Group ConfidenceConfidenceAffect on Long-term planning

Overconfidence

In General

Group Perform

ance

Collective efficacy

Group’s confidence

Process conflict

Long term decisions

The Hypothesis• Hypothesis 1 :

Surface level diversity & collective efficacy

• Hypothesis 2 :

Early collective efficacy & group performance

• Hypothesis 3 :

Early collective efficacy & early process conflict

The Hypothesis• Hypothesis 4 :

Early process conflict & group performance

• Hypothesis 5 :

Late collective efficacy & group performance

• Hypothesis 6 :

Late process conflict & group performance

The Methodology Two types of Study :

1) Preliminary Study 2) The Main Study

Preliminary Study

• Study Overview

At beginning period and end period

• Sample and Procedure

167 Participants, 53% Male, 42 Teams

• Measures

Control Variables:

Control Size

Average level of Interest

The Methodology 3. Group Performance: A Final Written Report A Scale of 0 – 100• Result Early Collective Efficacy was Negative Late Collective Efficacy was PositiveThe Main Study• Study Overview Followed Preliminary Study• Sample and Procedure 262 Participants, 53% Male, 72 Teams• Measures1. Collective Efficacy A Continuous 100 Point Scale 0 = not at all certain , 100 = absolutely certain

2. Process Conflict A Three Item Scale

The Methodology 3. Other types of intra-group conflict: Two types Conflict during early stage Task Conflict Relationship Conflict A Three Item Scale4. Group Performance: A Final Written Report A Scale of 0 – 100

• Study Variables Means Standard Deviation Correlation

ResultsPath Analysis

Factors that do not effect group performance

• Average age

• Average year of schooling

• Percentage of males in group

Results (Contd.)Relation between

• Collective Efficacy & Surface Level Diversity.

• Early Process Conflict & Collective Efficacy.

• Process Conflict & Group Performance.

• Group Performance & Collective Efficacy.

Results (Contd.)Factors that effect group performance

• Early Collective Efficacy

• Early Process Conflict

• Late Collective Efficacy

Results (Final)Two Additional Path Analysis

Small Sample Size

Focus on Process Conflict

Outcomes

Objective Feedback

Past Performance

Collective Efficacy

Process Conflict• Best use of Which, Whom, When & How !!

• Sorting

• Can be gain either by shared norms or alternative viewpoints

• Is linked with Long-Term decisions making

Thank You !!