24
Southern Methodist University PSYC 3382 1 Conducting Ethical Research Chapter 3

Conducting Ethical Research

  • Upload
    gage

  • View
    48

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Conducting Ethical Research. Chapter 3. Ethics in Research. Milgram Obedience Studies Teacher and Learner Teacher asks Learner questions When learner is wrong, teacher shocks him/her Teacher increases voltage with each wrong answer Experimenter: “The experiment requires that you continue”. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Conducting Ethical Research

Southern Methodist University

PSYC 33821

Conducting Ethical Research

Chapter 3

Page 2: Conducting Ethical Research

Southern Methodist University

PSYC 33822

Ethics in Research

• Milgram Obedience Studies – Teacher and Learner– Teacher asks Learner questions– When learner is wrong, teacher shocks

him/her– Teacher increases voltage with each

wrong answer– Experimenter: “The experiment

requires that you continue”

Page 3: Conducting Ethical Research

Southern Methodist University

PSYC 33823

Research with Human Participants

• Potential Issues– Protection of Participants– Protection of the field (liability)– Protection of Research

• Future participation• Maintaining funding

– Protection of Institutions• IRB

– Ethical use of research Implications

Page 4: Conducting Ethical Research

Southern Methodist University

PSYC 33824

Human Research (2)

• Potential Areas of Ethical Issues– Treatment of Participants

• IV manipulations– Velten mood induction

» Is it ethical to manipulate the mood of participants?» Read self-depressing statements» Watch very sad scenes of movies» Listen to sad music (Russian death march)

– Conflict» Is it ethical to create conflicts between

participants?– What if the IV creates a strong, positive effect?

» Is it ethical to exclude some participants from the benefits of a favorable manipulation?

Page 5: Conducting Ethical Research

Southern Methodist University

PSYC 33825

American Psychological Association (APA) Code

1. Investigator has ethical responsibility with research design

2. Determine level of participant risk3. Investigator has oversight of

ethical considerations (treatment by all involved)

4. Establish clear and fair agreement for participation

Page 6: Conducting Ethical Research

Southern Methodist University

PSYC 33826

APA Code (2)

5. Deception– Determination of value research– Debrief afterward to explain deception

6. Freedom to decline participation7. Prevent physical or mental

discomfort, harm, or danger and get informed consent about these risks

8. Researcher should debrief after completion of the study

Page 7: Conducting Ethical Research

Southern Methodist University

PSYC 33827

APA Code (3)

9. Researcher has responsibility to detect and remove negative consequences of participation

10.Maintain confidentiality at all times– Issue: Freedom of Information Act

• Is research supported by federal funds subject to FOIA?

• If so, how much is public? Names, data, results?

Page 8: Conducting Ethical Research

Southern Methodist University

PSYC 33828

Informed Consent and Deception

• Inform of “all aspects of the research that might reasonably be expected to influence willingness to participate…”– How do you define “reasonably”?

• Reasonable man, woman, and person standards in law

• Informed consent: Potential participants must be in a position to decide whether to participate in an experiment

Page 9: Conducting Ethical Research

Southern Methodist University

PSYC 33829

Deception (2)

• Cover story: provide a plausible explanation for the research procedures to cover true intention or procedure

• Deception: Research technique in which the participant is mislead about some aspect of the project– Used to control for participant reactivity– Might be as simple as stating that a different

aspect of the manipulation is what is of interest (e.g. Ss told measuring attitudes but actually interested in group interaction)

Page 10: Conducting Ethical Research

Southern Methodist University

PSYC 338210

Deception (3)

• Why is deception necessary (sometimes)?– Reactivity– Social desirability– Response acquiescence/deviance– Manipulate different mental states

• Conflict vs. cooperation mental sets have effects on social categorization

• Imagining that you are in conflict is different than being in conflict

Page 11: Conducting Ethical Research

Southern Methodist University

PSYC 338211

Deception (4)

• Follows ethical philosophy of Utilitarianism– Greatest good for the greatest number of

people• Ethics = (-6 units of harm X 40 Ss) + (+1 units of

good X 5000 people) (-240 + 5000 = 4760)

– Tradeoff between deception of participants and importance of the question being addressed

• Fully informed consent is the norm, and greater scrutiny is provided in cases where there is less than full information

Page 12: Conducting Ethical Research

Southern Methodist University

PSYC 338212

Freedom to Withdraw

• Participants are allowed to withdraw from participation at any time

• Do you give participation credit for completion of study or for volunteering?

Page 13: Conducting Ethical Research

Southern Methodist University

PSYC 338213

Protection from Harm

• Harm is both physical and psychological

• Research participation can often have unintended effects– Frustration from inability to complete

a cognitive or memory task– Learn something undesirable about

yourself

Page 14: Conducting Ethical Research

Southern Methodist University

PSYC 338214

Debriefing

• Researcher explains the general purposes of the research– Much more detailed when the

research involved deception• Explain that there was deception• Explain why the deception was necessary

Page 15: Conducting Ethical Research

Southern Methodist University

PSYC 338215

Removing Harmful Consequences

• Induce positive mood after a negative mood induction manipulation

• Provide contact information for helping resources

• Tell them what to expect and how to react to the consequences

Page 16: Conducting Ethical Research

Southern Methodist University

PSYC 338216

Confidentiality

• Information is confidential unless otherwise agreed

• Personal information is not revealed (name, SS#, phone #, etc.)

• What if you give a depression test and find someone is suicidal or severely depressed?

• Competing ethical principles

Page 17: Conducting Ethical Research

Southern Methodist University

PSYC 338217

Animal Research Ethics

• Many psychology departments that once had animal labs no longer do

• Animals are often used to answer questions that would be impossible or impractical to answer with humans

• Arguments against animal research:– Animals feel pain and their lives can be

destroyed– Destroying any living thing is dehumanizing– Speciesism: neglecting the rights of other

species

Page 18: Conducting Ethical Research

Southern Methodist University

PSYC 338218

Animal Research Ethics (2)

• Arguments for animal research– Utility: animals are harmed or killed only if

absolutely necessary (no intentional torture) and the implications of the research is worthwhile

– We almost all use animal products or animal-tested products daily

• Meat, drugs, clothing• Cosmetics – no animal testing b/c deemed not

worthwhile

– Some animal research benefits animals• Find non-lethal methods of crop protection

Page 19: Conducting Ethical Research

Southern Methodist University

PSYC 338219

Animal Research Ethics (3)

• Guidelines for their use– Ethics are not always yes/no issues, but process

issues (how they are used)• Care, use, and disposal of animals• Supervision and accountability• Minimize discomfort and pain• If termination is necessary, do it rapidly and painlessly

– We are more willing to accept euthanasia for animals in pain, so we do have some different standards

– Not an easy issue: Only really good argument is utility

Page 20: Conducting Ethical Research

Southern Methodist University

PSYC 338220

Ethics in Drug Research

• Qualified researchers using regulated procedures

• Different standards for different drugs– Drug classification

• Some drugs are considered as having no value (treatment or research)

– Standards change with the times– LSD was thought to be a particularly promising

drug for understanding insanity, consciousness

Page 21: Conducting Ethical Research

Southern Methodist University

PSYC 338221

Bias in Research

• Inadvertent researcher bias– Researchers are fallible and have

own ideas, beliefs, politics• Avoiding bias

– Double-blind studies• Removing bias in interpretations

– Placebo studies– Control groups

Page 22: Conducting Ethical Research

Southern Methodist University

PSYC 338222

No Control Group

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

10 20 30

Caffeine (mg)

Page 23: Conducting Ethical Research

Southern Methodist University

PSYC 338223

Control Group

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

0 10 20 30

Caffeine (mg)

Page 24: Conducting Ethical Research

Southern Methodist University

PSYC 338224

Fraud

• Fraud (deliberate bias) is a separate issue than normal research ethics and is (fortunately) rare– Faking data or altering data– Not presenting data that disagree with

one’s opinions– Peer review process (oversight)– There are ways for fraudulent research

to enter the mainstream database (citation chain)