98
1 oncerted Evolution oncerted Evolution Dan Graur

Concerted Evolution

  • Upload
    lea

  • View
    180

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Concerted Evolution. Dan Graur. Three evolutionary models for duplicated genes. Concerted Evolution. Divergent (classical) evolution vs. concerted evolution. Expected Observed. Ganley AR, Kobayashi T. 2007. Genome Res. 17:184-191. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Concerted Evolution

1

Concerted EvolutionConcerted EvolutionDan Graur

Page 2: Concerted Evolution

2

Three evolutionary models for duplicated genes

Page 3: Concerted Evolution

3

Page 4: Concerted Evolution

4Concerted EvolutionConcerted Evolution

Page 5: Concerted Evolution

Divergent (classical) evolution vs. concerted evolution

Ganley AR, Kobayashi T. 2007. Genome Res. 17:184-191.

Expected Observed

Page 6: Concerted Evolution

6

Ribosomal RNA gene unit (in a cluster)Ribosomal RNA gene unit (in a cluster)

ITS = internally transcribed sequencesETS = externally transcribed sequencesNTS = nontranscribed sequences

Page 7: Concerted Evolution

7

Xenopus laevisXenopus borealis

Page 8: Concerted Evolution

8

18S and 28S in X. laevis and X. borealis are identical.

NTS regions differ between the two species.

NTS regions are identical within each species.

Conclusion: Conclusion: NTS regions in each species have evolved in concert, but have diverged rapidly between species.

Page 9: Concerted Evolution

9

(a) Stringent selection.(a) Stringent selection.(b) Recent multiplication.(b) Recent multiplication.(c) Concerted evolution.(c) Concerted evolution.

Page 10: Concerted Evolution

10

(a) Stringent selection.(a) Stringent selection.

Refuted by the fact that the NTS regions are as conserved as the functional rRNA sequences.

Page 11: Concerted Evolution

11

(b) Recent multiplication.(b) Recent multiplication.

Refuted by the fact that the intraspecific homogeneity does not decrease with evolutionary time.

Page 12: Concerted Evolution

12

(c) Concerted evolution.(c) Concerted evolution.

Page 13: Concerted Evolution

13

CONCERTED EVOLUTION

A member of a gene family does not evolve independently of the other members of the family.

It exchanges sequence information with other members reciprocally or nonreciprocally.

Through genetic interactions among its members, a multigene family evolves in concert as a unit.

Page 14: Concerted Evolution

14

CONCERTED EVOLUTION

Concerted evolution results in a homogenized set of nonallelic homologous sequences.

Page 15: Concerted Evolution

15

CONCERTED EVOLUTION REQUIRES:

(1) the horizontal transfer of mutations among the family members (homogenization).

(2) the spread of mutations in the population (fixation).

Page 16: Concerted Evolution

16

Mechanisms of concerted evolution

1. Gene conversion2. Unequal crossing-over3. Duplicative transposition.4. Gene birth and death.

Page 17: Concerted Evolution

17

gene conversiongene conversion

concerted evolutionconcerted evolution

Page 18: Concerted Evolution

18

Page 19: Concerted Evolution

19

Page 20: Concerted Evolution

20

Gene Conversion

Unbiased Gene Conversion: Sequence A has as much chance of converting sequence B as sequence B has of converting sequence A.

Biased Gene Conversion: The probabilities of gene conversion between two sequences in the two possible directions occur are unequal.

If the conversional advantage of one sequence over the other is absolute, then one sequence is said to the mastermaster and the other to be the slaveslave.

Page 21: Concerted Evolution

21

Page 22: Concerted Evolution

22

Gene conversion has been found in Gene conversion has been found in allall ssppeciesecies and at and at allall lociloci that were that were examined in detail. examined in detail.

BiasedBiased gene conversion is more gene conversion is more common than common than unbiasedunbiased gene gene conversion.conversion.

The rate of gene conversion varies The rate of gene conversion varies with genomic location.with genomic location.

Page 23: Concerted Evolution

23

unequal crossing-overunequal crossing-over

concerted evolutionconcerted evolution

Page 24: Concerted Evolution

24

UnequalUnequal crossing overcrossing over

Unequal crossing overUnequal crossing over

Page 25: Concerted Evolution

25

Tomoko OhtaTomoko Ohta

Page 26: Concerted Evolution

26

concerted evolution:Advantages of Gene Conversion over Unequal Crossing-Over

1. Unequal crossing-over changes the number of repeats, and may cause a dosage imbalance. Gene conversion does not change repeat number.

Page 27: Concerted Evolution

27

normal configuration

Page 28: Concerted Evolution

28mild -thalassemia

following unequal crossing-over

Page 29: Concerted Evolution

29

concerted evolution:Advantages of Gene Conversion over Unequal Crossing-Over

2. Gene conversion can act on dispersed repeats. Unequal crossing-over is severely restricted when repeats are dispersed.

Page 30: Concerted Evolution

30

deletiondeletion

duplicationduplication

Page 31: Concerted Evolution

31

concerted evolution:Advantages of Gene Conversion over Unequal Crossing-Over

3. Gene conversion can be biased. Even a small bias can have a large effect on the probability of fixation of repeated mutants.

Page 32: Concerted Evolution

32

concerted evolution:Advantages of Unequal Crossing-

Over over Gene Conversion

1. Unequal crossing-over is faster and more efficient in bringing about concerted evolution. At the mutation level, UCO occurs At the mutation level, UCO occurs

more frequently than GC.more frequently than GC.

Page 33: Concerted Evolution

33

concerted evolution:Advantages of Unequal

Crossing-Over over Gene Conversion

2. In a gene-conversion event, only a small region is involved.

Page 34: Concerted Evolution

34

In yeast, an unequal crossing-over event involves on average ~20,000 bp20,000 bp. A gene-conversion track cannot exceed 1,500 bp1,500 bp.

Page 35: Concerted Evolution

35

Factors affecting the rate of concerted evolution

1. the number of repeats. 2. the arrangement of the repeats. 3. relative sizes of slowly and rapidly

evolving regions within the repeat unit.

4. constraints on homogeneity.5. mechanisms of concerted evolution. 6. population size.7. dose requirements

Page 36: Concerted Evolution

36

1. the number of repeats.1. the number of repeats.

Page 37: Concerted Evolution

37

Page 38: Concerted Evolution

38

The number of unequal number of unequal crossing-overscrossing-overs required for the fixation of a variant fixation of a variant repeatrepeat increases roughly with nn22, where n is the number of repeats.

Page 39: Concerted Evolution

39

2. the arrangement of the repeats. 2. the arrangement of the repeats.

Page 40: Concerted Evolution

40

Types of arrangement of repeated units:

DispersedClustered

Page 41: Concerted Evolution

41

The dispersed arrangement causes unequal crossing-over to lead to disastrous genetic consequences.

The dispersed arrangement reduces the frequency of gene conversion.

Page 42: Concerted Evolution

42

3. relative sizes of slowly and rapidly 3. relative sizes of slowly and rapidly evolving regions within the repeat unit.evolving regions within the repeat unit.

Page 43: Concerted Evolution

43

Noncoding regionsNoncoding regions evolve rapidlyrapidly.

Coding regionsCoding regions evolve slowlyslowly.

Both unequal crossing-over and gene conversion depend on sequence sequence similaritysimilarity for the misalignment of repeats.

The more coding regions there are, the higher the rates concerted evolution will be.

Page 44: Concerted Evolution

44

4. constraints on homogeneity.4. constraints on homogeneity.

Page 45: Concerted Evolution

45

Two extreme possibilities:

1. The function requires large amounts of an invariable gene product.

rRNA and histone genes

2. The function requires a large amount of diversity.

immunoglobulin and histocompatibility genes

Page 46: Concerted Evolution

46

Two extreme possibilities:

1. The function requires large amounts of an invariable gene product.

rRNA and histone genes

2. The function requires a large amount of diversity.

immunoglobulin and histocompatibility genes

Page 47: Concerted Evolution

47

5. mechanisms of concerted evolution.5. mechanisms of concerted evolution.

Page 48: Concerted Evolution

48

Concerted evolution Concerted evolution under unequal under unequal crossing-over is crossing-over is quickerquicker than that than that under gene under gene conversion. conversion.

Page 49: Concerted Evolution

49

6. population size.6. population size.

Page 50: Concerted Evolution

50

The time required for The time required for a variant to become a variant to become fixed in a population fixed in a population depends on depends on population population sizesize..

Page 51: Concerted Evolution

51

7. dose requirements.7. dose requirements.

Page 52: Concerted Evolution

52

Centripetal selection against too many or too few repeats.

Page 53: Concerted Evolution

53

Page 54: Concerted Evolution

54

Decreases variat

ion

Decreases variation

Decreases variation

Page 55: Concerted Evolution

55

2 loci, 33 alleles

gene conversiongene conversion

2 loci, 44 alleles

Page 56: Concerted Evolution

56

DDeetteeccttiinngg CCoonncceerrtteedd EEvvoolluuttiioonn

Page 57: Concerted Evolution

57

When dealing with similar paralogous sequences, it is usually impossible to distinguish between two alternatives:

(1) the sequences have (1) the sequences have only recently diverged only recently diverged from one another by from one another by duplication.duplication. (2) the sequences have (2) the sequences have evolved in concert.evolved in concert.

Page 58: Concerted Evolution

58

The phylogenetic approach.

The two -globin genes in humans are almost identical. They were initially thought to have duplicated quite recently, so there was no sufficient time for them to diverge in sequence.

Page 59: Concerted Evolution

59

The phylogenetic approach.

However, duplicated -globin genes were also discovered in distantly related species, so most parsimonious solution to assume that the duplication is quite ancient, but its antiquity is obscured by concerted evolution.

Page 60: Concerted Evolution

60

G A

GAGA

duplication

speciation

55 million years ago

5 million years ago

The The orthologs orthologs should be should be closer to closer to one one another another than the than the paralogs.paralogs.

Page 61: Concerted Evolution

61

In humans, the 5’ parts of G and A differ from one another at only 7 out of 1,550 nucleotide positions (0.5%).

In contrast, the 3’ parts of G and A differ from one another at 145 out of 1,550 nucleotide positions (9.4%).

Page 62: Concerted Evolution

62

exon 3exon 3 exons 1 and 2 exons 1 and 2

Page 63: Concerted Evolution

63

exon 3exon 3 exons 1 and 2 exons 1 and 2

Expected phylogenetic tree for exons 1 and 2, if gene conversion had only occurred in the human lineage.

Page 64: Concerted Evolution

64

Death is not final: The resurrection of Death is not final: The resurrection of pancreatic ribonuclease as seminal pancreatic ribonuclease as seminal ribonuclease in Bovinae by gene ribonuclease in Bovinae by gene conversionconversion

Page 65: Concerted Evolution

65

The resurrection of pancreatic The resurrection of pancreatic ribonuclease as seminal ribonuclease in ribonuclease as seminal ribonuclease in Bovinae through gene-conversion of a Bovinae through gene-conversion of a small region at the 5' end of the gene. small region at the 5' end of the gene.

Page 66: Concerted Evolution

66

Pseudogenes may Pseudogenes may represent reservoirs of represent reservoirs of genetic information that genetic information that participate in the participate in the evolution of new genes, evolution of new genes, not only relics of not only relics of inactivated genes whose inactivated genes whose fate is genomic fate is genomic extinction.extinction.

Page 67: Concerted Evolution

67

Page 68: Concerted Evolution

68

21-hydroxylase 21-hydroxylase (cytochrome (cytochrome P21)P21) gene gene

In humans, the 10-exon gene is located on chromosome 6.

The gene has a paralogous pseudogene in the vicinity.

Page 69: Concerted Evolution

69

Page 70: Concerted Evolution

70

21-hydroxylase 21-hydroxylase (cytochrome (cytochrome P21)P21) gene gene

Hundreds of mutations in the 21-hydroxylase gene have been described.

75% of them are due to gene conversion.

Page 71: Concerted Evolution

71

Page 72: Concerted Evolution

72

gene ATGTCTCTGACCAAGGCTGAGAGGACCATGGTCGTGTCCATATGGGGCAApseudogene ATGTCTCTGACCAAGGCTGAGAGGACCATGGTCGTGTCCATATGGGGCAA **************************************************

gene GATCTCCATGCAGGCGGATGCCGTGGGCACCGAGGCCCTGCAGAGGTGAGpseudogene GATCTCCATGCAGGCGGATGCCGTGGGCACCGAGGCCCTGCAGAG----- *********************************************

gene TGCCAGACAGCCTGGGACAGGTGACAGTGTCCCAGGTGACACTGGTGTAGpseudogene --------------------------------------------------

Gene GTGACAGCGTGAGTTTAGTGAGGACAGGGGCCAGTGAAGAGGGGGCAATGpseudogene --------------------------------------------------

gene AGGAAGCGACAGTGTGGAGGGGTAATTGTGGTGGGGAACTGTGAGGACCC...pseudogene --------------------------------------------------

Were it not for the fact that the pseudogene is truncated, we would be hard pressed to say which is the gene and which is the pseudogene.

Page 73: Concerted Evolution

73

gene ATGTCTCTGACCAAGGCTGAGAGGACCATGGTCGTGTCCATATGGGGCAApseudogene ATGTCTCTGACCAAGGCTGAGAGGACCATGGTCGTGTCCATATGGGGCAA **************************************************

gene GATCTCCATGCAGGCGGATGCCGTGGGCACCGAGGCCCTGCAGAGGTGAGpseudogene GATCTCCATGCAGGCGGATGCCGTGGGCACCGAGGCCCTGCAGAG----- *********************************************

gene TGCCAGACAGCCTGGGACAGGTGACAGTGTCCCAGGTGACACTGGTGTAGpseudogene --------------------------------------------------

Gene GTGACAGCGTGAGTTTAGTGAGGACAGGGGCCAGTGAAGAGGGGGCAATGpseudogene --------------------------------------------------

gene AGGAAGCGACAGTGTGGAGGGGTAATTGTGGTGGGGAACTGTGAGGACCC...pseudogene --------------------------------------------------

Were it not for the fact that the pseudogene is truncated, we would be hard pressed to say which is the gene and which is the pseudogene.

Page 74: Concerted Evolution

74

The birth-and-death model for the evolution of gene families was proposed by Hughes and Nei (1989).

In this model, new copies are produced by gene duplication.

Some of the duplicate genes diverge functionally; others become pseudogenes owing to deleterious mutations or are deleted from the genome.

The end result of this mode of evolution is a multigene family with a mixture of functional genes exhibiting varying degrees of similarity to one another plus a substantial number of pseudogenes interspersed in the mixture.

Page 75: Concerted Evolution

75

The birth-and-death model for the evolution of gene families

An important prediction of the birth-and-death process is that gene-family size will vary among taxa as a result of differential birth and death of genes among different evolutionary lineages.

Thus, an understanding of the evolutionary forces governing the birth-and-death process is predicated upon an accurate accounting of the number of births (duplications) and deaths (nonfunctionalization events + deletions) in each lineage.

This “bookkeeping” turns out to be anything but a trivial undertaking.

Page 76: Concerted Evolution

76

Expansions/no change/contractions in the evolution of gene families in five Saccharomyces species. Estimates of divergence times (in millions of years) are shown in circles.

Page 77: Concerted Evolution

77

There were 3517 gene families shared by the five species. Of these, 1254 (~37%) have changed in size across the tree. On each branch in the tree, the vast majority of gene family sizes remain static. Expansions outnumbered contractions on four of the eight branches, and contractions outnumbered expansions on the other four.

Page 78: Concerted Evolution

78

Let us compare the number of expansions and contractions on the branches leading to S. mikatae and S. cerevisiae from their common ancestor, approximately 22 million years ago. On the lineage leading to S. mikatae there were 509 families that expanded and 86 families that contracted—a ratio of 6:1. On the lineage leading to S. cerevisae a smaller number of families changed their size, and the ratio of expanded families (54) to contracted ones (241) was inverted, 1:5.

Lineage specificity

Page 79: Concerted Evolution

79

Turnover Rates

Turnover = Gains + Losses

The gene turnover rate in primates is nearly twice that in non-primate mammals (0.0024 versus 0.0014 gains and losses per gene per million years).

A further acceleration must have occurred in the great-ape lineage, such that humans and chimps gain and lose genes almost three times faster (0.0039 gains and losses per gene per million years) than the other mammals.

Page 80: Concerted Evolution

80

BIRTH-AND-DEATH EVOLUTION: EXAMPLESThe evolution of olfactory receptor gene repertoires Olfactory receptors are G-coupled proteins that have seven α-helical transmembrane regions. Olfactory receptor genes are predominantly expressed in sensory neurons of the main olfactory epithelium in the nasal cavity. Animals use different olfactory receptors and different combinations of olfactory receptors to detect volatile or water-soluble chemicals.

Page 81: Concerted Evolution

81

BIRTH-AND-DEATH EVOLUTION: EXAMPLESThe evolution of olfactory receptor gene repertoiresTetrapods have 400-2,100 olfactory receptor sequences, but 20-60% are pseudogenes. These numbers are small in comparison to the number of odorants, but olfactory receptors function in a combinatorial manner, whereby a single receptor may detect multiple odorants, and a single odorant may be detected by multiple receptors.

Functional olfactory receptor genes (red) Pseudogenes (blue)

Page 82: Concerted Evolution

82

BIRTH-AND-DEATH EVOLUTION: EXAMPLESThe evolution of olfactory receptor gene repertoiresVertebrate olfactory receptors genes are classified into at least nine subfamiles (, and ), each of which originated from one or a few ancestral genes in the most recent common ancestor of vertebrates. There was an enormous expansion in the number of and genes in non-amphibian tetrapods. The remaining gene families are present primarily in fish and amphibian genomes. This observation suggests that and mostly detect airborne odorants, while the function of the other gene families is to detect water-soluble odorants.

Page 83: Concerted Evolution

83

BIRTH-AND-DEATH EVOLUTION: EXAMPLESThe evolution of olfactory receptor gene repertoiresPrimates generally have a smaller number of functional olfactory receptor genes than rodents and a higher proportion of pseudogenes.

388 genes, 414 pseudogenes (52%)

1063 genes, 328 pseudogenes (24%)

Page 84: Concerted Evolution

84

Color Vision

BIRTH-AND-DEATH EVOLUTION: EXAMPLES

Page 85: Concerted Evolution

85

Page 86: Concerted Evolution

86

Color vision in primates is mediated in the eye by up to three types of photoreceptor cells (cones), which transduce photic energy into electrical potentials.

Page 87: Concerted Evolution

87

Each type of color-sensitive cone expresses one type of color-sensitive pigment (photopigment). Each photopigment consists of two components: a transmembrane protein called opsin, and either of two lipid derivatives of vitamin A, 11-cis-retinal or 11-cis-3,4-dehydroretinal. Variation in spectral sensitivity, i.e., color specificity is determined by the sensitivity maximum of the opsins.

Page 88: Concerted Evolution

88

John Dalton. 1794. “Extraordinary Facts Relating to the Vision of Colours.” Memoirs of the Manchester Literary & Philosophical Society.

Page 89: Concerted Evolution

89Ishihara Plates

Page 90: Concerted Evolution

90

OpOpsinssins

Long wavelength (red)Medium wavelength (green)Short wavelength (blue)

Suggested flag for Mars

Page 91: Concerted Evolution

91

• Routine trichromacy = all individuals regardless of sex can achieve trichromacy. • Dichromacy (in humans, referred to as color blindness):

protanopia (L-deficiency), deuteranopia (M-deficiency), tritanopia (S-deficiency).

• Because of X-linkage, protanopia and deuteranopia are considerably more common in males than in females. •Monochromacy can occur if both L and M photopigments are faulty.

Page 92: Concerted Evolution

92

Most prosiminas (Strepsirrhini) and New World monkeys (Platyrhhini) carry only one X-linked pigment gene, and are, therefore, dichromatic. The ancestral X-linked opsin is thought to resemble the M-opsin, and indeed most prosimians and New World monkeys are protanopic.

Page 93: Concerted Evolution

93

However, because shifts in the maximal sensitivity of opsins can be achieved quite easily by missense mutations in as few as 3-5 codons, in a few diurnal taxa of prosimians, L-alleles have been produced. In some lineages, the L-allele became fixed in the population at the expense of the M-alleles. In consequence, these taxa are deuteranopic.

Page 94: Concerted Evolution

94

In other cases, a polymorphic state consisting of two or more alleles is maintained in the population. As an example, in white-faced capuchin monkeys (Cebus capucinus), there exist two alleles at the X-linked opsin locus, the maximal-sensitivity peaks of which being similar to those of human L and M opsins, respectively. For this reason, while males and homozygous females are dichromatic, heterozygous females are trichromatic (Figure 6a.8). This type of trichromacy is called allelic trichromacy.

Page 95: Concerted Evolution

95

Saimiri sciureusSquirrel monkey

New-World monkeys possess only two opsin loci, one autosomal and one X-linked. However, the X-linked opsin locus is highly polymorphic. Two of these alleles have maximal-sensitivity peaks similar to those of human red and green opsin, while the third allele has an intermediate peak. A heterozygous female will be trichromatic, while males and homozygous females are dichromatic.

Page 96: Concerted Evolution

96

Page 97: Concerted Evolution

97

Page 98: Concerted Evolution

98