Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
COMSTAT 2.1 A biofilm quantification programClaus Sternberg, Assoc.Prof., Ph.D.Martin Vorregaard, M.Sc.2
Bjarne Ersbøll, Assoc. Prof., Ph.D.1
Janus Haagensen, Assist. Prof., M.Sc.3
Søren Molin, Professor., Ph.D3
1 DTU Department of Informatics and Mathematical Modelling2 Current Address: SEAS-NVE A/S, Ringsted, Denmark3 DTU Department of Biosustainability
October 2015COMSTAT 2.12 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark
We want to be able to perform reproduciblebiofilm experiments with unbiased
interpretation of results
October 2015COMSTAT 2.13 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark
Biofilm data from CLSM
October 2015COMSTAT 2.14 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark
BiofilmDescriptive parameters
Which species are present?
What is the structure (the 3-dimensional distribution) of the species in the biofilm?
What is the individual bacterium doing?
Do they communicate?
October 2015COMSTAT 2.15 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark
WT cepI mutantcepI mutant
+ 200 nM C8-HSLWT cepI mutantcepI mutant
+ 200 nM C8-HSL
Quantifying biofilm structures
wt cepI mutant cepI + 200nM C-8-HSL
October 2015COMSTAT 2.16 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark
What a man sees depend both of what he is looking at and what his previous visual-conceptual experience has taught him to see.
Thomas Samuel Kuhn, 1970
October 2015COMSTAT 2.17 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark
What a man sees depend both of what he is looking at and what his previous visual-conceptual experience has taught him to see.
Thomas Samuel Kuhn, 1970
October 2015COMSTAT 2.18 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark
Visual observation
Biofilm
Conclusion
Subjective analysis
Automated image recording (stochastic)
Quantitative analysis
Statistical analysis
Conclusions
October 2015COMSTAT 2.19 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark
COMSTAT 1– processing of image data
Quantitative measurement vs. subjective observation
The first 3D biofilm quantification program
Written as a MATLAB® scriptLimitations: • File format (TIFF)• info-file (pixelsize, number of sections) –
legacy Leica format• Filename-syntax (xxx10.tiff, xxx11.tiff, xxx12.tiff...)• Thresholding (’Look’ function)
- noise filtering- binary conversion- connected volume filtering (?)
à Run COMSTAT in MATLAB
October 2015COMSTAT 2.110 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark
COMSTATQuantifying biofilm structure
COMSTAT can quantify biofilm images captured using a confocal microscope:- Biofilm thickness - Biovolume (“Biomass”)- Roughness - Surface to Volume ratio- Substratum coverage - Number of micro colonies- Micro colony size- Diffusion distances- Fractal dimension- Run Lengths
October 2015COMSTAT 2.111 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark
COMSTAT – mode of operation
What Comstat “sees” is only an approximation…
October 2015COMSTAT 2.112 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark
COMSTAT – the interface
“Modifiers”
“Features”
Connected Volume Filtering
Smacking
October 2015COMSTAT 2.113 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark
COMSTAT – parameters calculated
• Bio-volume (µm3/µm2)Biomass volume divided by substratum area - provides an estimate of the biomass in the biofilm.
• Area occupied (by biomass) in each layer (µm2/µm2, dimensionless) Substratum coverage is the area-coverage at the base of the biofilm.
• Thickness distribution and average thickness(The thickness measure ignores the presence of pores or voids in the biofilm)
October 2015COMSTAT 2.114 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark
• Identification and area distribution of micro-colonies at the substratum- A minimum micro-colony size must be specified. - The function calculates the total number of micro-colonies, the area size of each micro-colony (µm2) and the average micro-colony area (µm2).
• Volumes of microcolonies identified at the substratum- This function calculates the volume (µm3) of each of the micro-colonies identified above and the average micro-colony volume (µm3).
COMSTAT – parameters calculated
October 2015COMSTAT 2.115 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark
• Fractal dimension
• Roughness coefficient (variation in thickness)calculated from the thickness distribution of the biofilm
- Lfi is the i’th individual thickness measurement-over-lined Lf is the average thickness- N is the number of thickness measurements.
à Biofilm roughness provides a measure of how much the thickness of the biofilm varies, and is an indicator of biofilm heterogeneity.
Ra*=1N
Lfi−Lf
Lfi=1
N
∑
COMSTAT – parameters calculated
October 2015COMSTAT 2.116 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark
• Distribution of diffusion distances, average and maximum diffusion distanceThe diffusion distance for a voxel containing bio-mass is the shortest distance from that voxel to a voxel not containing bio-mass (void)Average and maximum diffusion distances have been suggested as measures of the distances, over which nutrients and other substrate components have to diffuse from the voids to the bacteria within micro-colonies
• Surface to volume ratio (surface area/bio-volume, µm2/µm3)-reflects what fraction of the biofilm is in fact exposed to the nutrient flow(How does the biofilm adapt to the environment? Does a low nutrient environments lead to an increased surface to volume ratio to optimize access to the limited supply of nutrients?)
COMSTAT – parameters calculated
October 2015COMSTAT 2.117 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark
COMSTAT – the interface
Click “Go” to start
Output files compatible with Excel (Right-click an output file and select Open with… -> Excel
Output files are placed in the same directory as the images
October 2015COMSTAT 2.118 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark
Example
Three independent experiment rounds
Each experiment:
- Four strains of P. aeruginosa, each in two channels equals 8 channels- Five time points: 55h, 98h, 146h, 242h, 314h- Nine image stacks in each channel at each time point
Total: 1080 image stacksImages are acquired at random spots at a distance of 5-10
mm from the inlet to the flow-channels.
October 2015COMSTAT 2.119 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark
P. aeruginosa wt P. aeruginosarpoS
P. aeruginosaΔpilHIJK
P. aeruginosalasI
Flow chamber biofilmsof P. aeruginosa146 hours afterinoculation
October 2015COMSTAT 2.120 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark
0 5 10 15 200
0.5
1
1.5
Average thickness (µm)
Rou
ghne
ssCOMSTAT analysis of P. aeruginosastrains
× P. aeruginosa PAO1o P. aeruginosa rpoS+ P. aeruginosaΔpilHIJK* P. aeruginosa lasI
55 hours
0 5 10 15 200
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Average thickness (µm)R
ough
ness
98 hours
0 10 20 300
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
Average thickness (µm)
Rou
ghne
ss
0 20 40 600
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Average thickness (µm)
Rou
ghne
ss146 hours 314 hours
October 2015COMSTAT 2.121 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark
Statistical analysis of biofilm structure
)()()( ijkijkijjiijk ZBRCBRRbY +++++=
Variance model
Yijkn : Observed value for bacterial strain i, experiment round j, channel number k, and image stack n.
µ : Overall mean value of the experimentb : Additional effect of bacterial strain i (strain i = 1,2,...)Rj : Random effect of experiment round j (round j = 1,2,...)BRij : Random effect of a possible interaction between bacterial
strain i and round jC(BR)k(ij): Random effect of channel k (channel k = 1,2,...)Zv(ijk) : Residual error of observation (strain i, round j, channel k)
October 2015COMSTAT 2.122 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark1 2 3
-2.5
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
Log average thickness
Log
roug
hnes
s
1 2 3-2.5
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
Log average thickness
Log
roug
hnes
s
1 2 3-2.5
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
Log average thicknessLo
g ro
ughn
ess
1 2 3-2.5
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
Log average thickness
Log
roug
hnes
s
55 hours 98 hours
146 hours 314 hours
Comparison of P. aeruginosa biofilm architecture
× P. aeruginosa PAO1o P. aeruginosa rpoS+ P. aeruginosaDpilHIJK* P. aeruginosa lasI
October 2015COMSTAT 2.123 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark
1. Design and optimization of a setup for running reproducible biofilm
experiments
Quantification and statistical analysisof biofilm structures
2. Several rounds of independent biofilm
experiments. Acquisition of images.
3. Quantification of biofilm images by
COMSTAT
4. Selection of variable(s) to be used in
statistical analysis
5. Design of statistical model
6. Statistical analysis
October 2015COMSTAT 2.124 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark
Obtaining Comstat:
http://www.comstat.dk