24
COMSTAT 2.1 A biofilm quantification program Claus Sternberg, Assoc.Prof., Ph.D. Martin Vorregaard, M.Sc. 2 Bjarne Ersbøll, Assoc. Prof., Ph.D. 1 Janus Haagensen, Assist. Prof., M.Sc. 3 Søren Molin, Professor., Ph.D 3 1 DTU Department of Informatics and Mathematical Modelling 2 Current Address: SEAS-NVE A/S, Ringsted, Denmark 3 DTU Department of Biosustainability

COMSTAT 2.1 A biofilm quantification program13 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark COMSTAT 2.1 October 2015 COMSTAT – parameters calculated • Bio-volume (µm3/µm2)

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: COMSTAT 2.1 A biofilm quantification program13 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark COMSTAT 2.1 October 2015 COMSTAT – parameters calculated • Bio-volume (µm3/µm2)

COMSTAT 2.1 A biofilm quantification programClaus Sternberg, Assoc.Prof., Ph.D.Martin Vorregaard, M.Sc.2

Bjarne Ersbøll, Assoc. Prof., Ph.D.1

Janus Haagensen, Assist. Prof., M.Sc.3

Søren Molin, Professor., Ph.D3

1 DTU Department of Informatics and Mathematical Modelling2 Current Address: SEAS-NVE A/S, Ringsted, Denmark3 DTU Department of Biosustainability

Page 2: COMSTAT 2.1 A biofilm quantification program13 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark COMSTAT 2.1 October 2015 COMSTAT – parameters calculated • Bio-volume (µm3/µm2)

October 2015COMSTAT 2.12 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark

We want to be able to perform reproduciblebiofilm experiments with unbiased

interpretation of results

Page 3: COMSTAT 2.1 A biofilm quantification program13 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark COMSTAT 2.1 October 2015 COMSTAT – parameters calculated • Bio-volume (µm3/µm2)

October 2015COMSTAT 2.13 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark

Biofilm data from CLSM

Page 4: COMSTAT 2.1 A biofilm quantification program13 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark COMSTAT 2.1 October 2015 COMSTAT – parameters calculated • Bio-volume (µm3/µm2)

October 2015COMSTAT 2.14 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark

BiofilmDescriptive parameters

Which species are present?

What is the structure (the 3-dimensional distribution) of the species in the biofilm?

What is the individual bacterium doing?

Do they communicate?

Page 5: COMSTAT 2.1 A biofilm quantification program13 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark COMSTAT 2.1 October 2015 COMSTAT – parameters calculated • Bio-volume (µm3/µm2)

October 2015COMSTAT 2.15 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark

WT cepI mutantcepI mutant

+ 200 nM C8-HSLWT cepI mutantcepI mutant

+ 200 nM C8-HSL

Quantifying biofilm structures

wt cepI mutant cepI + 200nM C-8-HSL

Page 6: COMSTAT 2.1 A biofilm quantification program13 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark COMSTAT 2.1 October 2015 COMSTAT – parameters calculated • Bio-volume (µm3/µm2)

October 2015COMSTAT 2.16 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark

What a man sees depend both of what he is looking at and what his previous visual-conceptual experience has taught him to see.

Thomas Samuel Kuhn, 1970

Page 7: COMSTAT 2.1 A biofilm quantification program13 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark COMSTAT 2.1 October 2015 COMSTAT – parameters calculated • Bio-volume (µm3/µm2)

October 2015COMSTAT 2.17 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark

What a man sees depend both of what he is looking at and what his previous visual-conceptual experience has taught him to see.

Thomas Samuel Kuhn, 1970

Page 8: COMSTAT 2.1 A biofilm quantification program13 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark COMSTAT 2.1 October 2015 COMSTAT – parameters calculated • Bio-volume (µm3/µm2)

October 2015COMSTAT 2.18 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark

Visual observation

Biofilm

Conclusion

Subjective analysis

Automated image recording (stochastic)

Quantitative analysis

Statistical analysis

Conclusions

Page 9: COMSTAT 2.1 A biofilm quantification program13 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark COMSTAT 2.1 October 2015 COMSTAT – parameters calculated • Bio-volume (µm3/µm2)

October 2015COMSTAT 2.19 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark

COMSTAT 1– processing of image data

Quantitative measurement vs. subjective observation

The first 3D biofilm quantification program

Written as a MATLAB® scriptLimitations: • File format (TIFF)• info-file (pixelsize, number of sections) –

legacy Leica format• Filename-syntax (xxx10.tiff, xxx11.tiff, xxx12.tiff...)• Thresholding (’Look’ function)

- noise filtering- binary conversion- connected volume filtering (?)

à Run COMSTAT in MATLAB

Page 10: COMSTAT 2.1 A biofilm quantification program13 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark COMSTAT 2.1 October 2015 COMSTAT – parameters calculated • Bio-volume (µm3/µm2)

October 2015COMSTAT 2.110 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark

COMSTATQuantifying biofilm structure

COMSTAT can quantify biofilm images captured using a confocal microscope:- Biofilm thickness - Biovolume (“Biomass”)- Roughness - Surface to Volume ratio- Substratum coverage - Number of micro colonies- Micro colony size- Diffusion distances- Fractal dimension- Run Lengths

Page 11: COMSTAT 2.1 A biofilm quantification program13 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark COMSTAT 2.1 October 2015 COMSTAT – parameters calculated • Bio-volume (µm3/µm2)

October 2015COMSTAT 2.111 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark

COMSTAT – mode of operation

What Comstat “sees” is only an approximation…

Page 12: COMSTAT 2.1 A biofilm quantification program13 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark COMSTAT 2.1 October 2015 COMSTAT – parameters calculated • Bio-volume (µm3/µm2)

October 2015COMSTAT 2.112 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark

COMSTAT – the interface

“Modifiers”

“Features”

Connected Volume Filtering

Smacking

Page 13: COMSTAT 2.1 A biofilm quantification program13 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark COMSTAT 2.1 October 2015 COMSTAT – parameters calculated • Bio-volume (µm3/µm2)

October 2015COMSTAT 2.113 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark

COMSTAT – parameters calculated

• Bio-volume (µm3/µm2)Biomass volume divided by substratum area - provides an estimate of the biomass in the biofilm.

• Area occupied (by biomass) in each layer (µm2/µm2, dimensionless) Substratum coverage is the area-coverage at the base of the biofilm.

• Thickness distribution and average thickness(The thickness measure ignores the presence of pores or voids in the biofilm)

Page 14: COMSTAT 2.1 A biofilm quantification program13 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark COMSTAT 2.1 October 2015 COMSTAT – parameters calculated • Bio-volume (µm3/µm2)

October 2015COMSTAT 2.114 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark

• Identification and area distribution of micro-colonies at the substratum- A minimum micro-colony size must be specified. - The function calculates the total number of micro-colonies, the area size of each micro-colony (µm2) and the average micro-colony area (µm2).

• Volumes of microcolonies identified at the substratum- This function calculates the volume (µm3) of each of the micro-colonies identified above and the average micro-colony volume (µm3).

COMSTAT – parameters calculated

Page 15: COMSTAT 2.1 A biofilm quantification program13 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark COMSTAT 2.1 October 2015 COMSTAT – parameters calculated • Bio-volume (µm3/µm2)

October 2015COMSTAT 2.115 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark

• Fractal dimension

• Roughness coefficient (variation in thickness)calculated from the thickness distribution of the biofilm

- Lfi is the i’th individual thickness measurement-over-lined Lf is the average thickness- N is the number of thickness measurements.

à Biofilm roughness provides a measure of how much the thickness of the biofilm varies, and is an indicator of biofilm heterogeneity.

Ra*=1N

Lfi−Lf

Lfi=1

N

COMSTAT – parameters calculated

Page 16: COMSTAT 2.1 A biofilm quantification program13 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark COMSTAT 2.1 October 2015 COMSTAT – parameters calculated • Bio-volume (µm3/µm2)

October 2015COMSTAT 2.116 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark

• Distribution of diffusion distances, average and maximum diffusion distanceThe diffusion distance for a voxel containing bio-mass is the shortest distance from that voxel to a voxel not containing bio-mass (void)Average and maximum diffusion distances have been suggested as measures of the distances, over which nutrients and other substrate components have to diffuse from the voids to the bacteria within micro-colonies

• Surface to volume ratio (surface area/bio-volume, µm2/µm3)-reflects what fraction of the biofilm is in fact exposed to the nutrient flow(How does the biofilm adapt to the environment? Does a low nutrient environments lead to an increased surface to volume ratio to optimize access to the limited supply of nutrients?)

COMSTAT – parameters calculated

Page 17: COMSTAT 2.1 A biofilm quantification program13 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark COMSTAT 2.1 October 2015 COMSTAT – parameters calculated • Bio-volume (µm3/µm2)

October 2015COMSTAT 2.117 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark

COMSTAT – the interface

Click “Go” to start

Output files compatible with Excel (Right-click an output file and select Open with… -> Excel

Output files are placed in the same directory as the images

Page 18: COMSTAT 2.1 A biofilm quantification program13 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark COMSTAT 2.1 October 2015 COMSTAT – parameters calculated • Bio-volume (µm3/µm2)

October 2015COMSTAT 2.118 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark

Example

Three independent experiment rounds

Each experiment:

- Four strains of P. aeruginosa, each in two channels equals 8 channels- Five time points: 55h, 98h, 146h, 242h, 314h- Nine image stacks in each channel at each time point

Total: 1080 image stacksImages are acquired at random spots at a distance of 5-10

mm from the inlet to the flow-channels.

Page 19: COMSTAT 2.1 A biofilm quantification program13 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark COMSTAT 2.1 October 2015 COMSTAT – parameters calculated • Bio-volume (µm3/µm2)

October 2015COMSTAT 2.119 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark

P. aeruginosa wt P. aeruginosarpoS

P. aeruginosaΔpilHIJK

P. aeruginosalasI

Flow chamber biofilmsof P. aeruginosa146 hours afterinoculation

Page 20: COMSTAT 2.1 A biofilm quantification program13 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark COMSTAT 2.1 October 2015 COMSTAT – parameters calculated • Bio-volume (µm3/µm2)

October 2015COMSTAT 2.120 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark

0 5 10 15 200

0.5

1

1.5

Average thickness (µm)

Rou

ghne

ssCOMSTAT analysis of P. aeruginosastrains

× P. aeruginosa PAO1o P. aeruginosa rpoS+ P. aeruginosaΔpilHIJK* P. aeruginosa lasI

55 hours

0 5 10 15 200

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

Average thickness (µm)R

ough

ness

98 hours

0 10 20 300

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

Average thickness (µm)

Rou

ghne

ss

0 20 40 600

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

Average thickness (µm)

Rou

ghne

ss146 hours 314 hours

Page 21: COMSTAT 2.1 A biofilm quantification program13 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark COMSTAT 2.1 October 2015 COMSTAT – parameters calculated • Bio-volume (µm3/µm2)

October 2015COMSTAT 2.121 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark

Statistical analysis of biofilm structure

)()()( ijkijkijjiijk ZBRCBRRbY +++++=

Variance model

Yijkn : Observed value for bacterial strain i, experiment round j, channel number k, and image stack n.

µ : Overall mean value of the experimentb : Additional effect of bacterial strain i (strain i = 1,2,...)Rj : Random effect of experiment round j (round j = 1,2,...)BRij : Random effect of a possible interaction between bacterial

strain i and round jC(BR)k(ij): Random effect of channel k (channel k = 1,2,...)Zv(ijk) : Residual error of observation (strain i, round j, channel k)

Page 22: COMSTAT 2.1 A biofilm quantification program13 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark COMSTAT 2.1 October 2015 COMSTAT – parameters calculated • Bio-volume (µm3/µm2)

October 2015COMSTAT 2.122 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark1 2 3

-2.5

-2

-1.5

-1

-0.5

0

Log average thickness

Log

roug

hnes

s

1 2 3-2.5

-2

-1.5

-1

-0.5

0

Log average thickness

Log

roug

hnes

s

1 2 3-2.5

-2

-1.5

-1

-0.5

0

Log average thicknessLo

g ro

ughn

ess

1 2 3-2.5

-2

-1.5

-1

-0.5

0

Log average thickness

Log

roug

hnes

s

55 hours 98 hours

146 hours 314 hours

Comparison of P. aeruginosa biofilm architecture

× P. aeruginosa PAO1o P. aeruginosa rpoS+ P. aeruginosaDpilHIJK* P. aeruginosa lasI

Page 23: COMSTAT 2.1 A biofilm quantification program13 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark COMSTAT 2.1 October 2015 COMSTAT – parameters calculated • Bio-volume (µm3/µm2)

October 2015COMSTAT 2.123 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark

1. Design and optimization of a setup for running reproducible biofilm

experiments

Quantification and statistical analysisof biofilm structures

2. Several rounds of independent biofilm

experiments. Acquisition of images.

3. Quantification of biofilm images by

COMSTAT

4. Selection of variable(s) to be used in

statistical analysis

5. Design of statistical model

6. Statistical analysis

Page 24: COMSTAT 2.1 A biofilm quantification program13 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark COMSTAT 2.1 October 2015 COMSTAT – parameters calculated • Bio-volume (µm3/µm2)

October 2015COMSTAT 2.124 DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark

Obtaining Comstat:

http://www.comstat.dk