10
COMSTAC Risk Management Working Group October 28, 2009 Chris Kunstadter XL Insurance [email protected]

COMSTAC Risk Management Working Group October 28, 2009 Chris Kunstadter XL Insurance [email protected]

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: COMSTAC Risk Management Working Group October 28, 2009 Chris Kunstadter XL Insurance chris.kunstadter@xlgroup.com

COMSTAC Risk Management Working GroupOctober 28, 2009

Chris Kunstadter

XL Insurance

[email protected]

Page 2: COMSTAC Risk Management Working Group October 28, 2009 Chris Kunstadter XL Insurance chris.kunstadter@xlgroup.com

Page 2 Apr 21, 2023

Risk Management Working Group

Extension of CSLA indemnification Three-year extension passed House and sent to

Senate

Combined Meeting with Space Transp Ops WG Orbital debris mitigation for upper stages

Current practices and guidelines Characterization of current environment

Page 3: COMSTAC Risk Management Working Group October 28, 2009 Chris Kunstadter XL Insurance chris.kunstadter@xlgroup.com

Page 3 Apr 21, 2023

Upper Stage Debris RisksNASA’s viewpoint

Debris is not yet imminently catastrophic, but mitigation should be initiated

Without mitigation, risk increases dramatically in the long term

International consensus (USG, NASA, ESA, IADC, UN) exists for the proper disposal of launch vehicle orbital stages

Passivation

Short-term presence in LEO (<25 yrs) and GEO (>235+ km)

Limitation of re-entry risks (casualty ratio: 1 in 10,000)

US launch vehicle operators generally doing a good job in all three areas

Formal evaluations for all commercial missions would be beneficial

Greatest challenge [for US launch vehicles] is the reentry risk for Delta 4 and Atlas 5 orbital stages

Page 4: COMSTAC Risk Management Working Group October 28, 2009 Chris Kunstadter XL Insurance chris.kunstadter@xlgroup.com

Page 4 Apr 21, 2023

Growth of Tracked Object PopulationObjects >5-10 cm

Average growth rates:

1961 – 2007: 220 objects/year

2007 – 2009: 2,200 objects/year

Page 5: COMSTAC Risk Management Working Group October 28, 2009 Chris Kunstadter XL Insurance chris.kunstadter@xlgroup.com

Page 5 Apr 21, 2023

Low Earth Orbit Debris Issues

Low earth orbit (LEO) is increasingly used for commercial (and insured) activity

20 insured commercial satellites (out of >2,000 active satellites) in LEO are insured for $1 billion

Typically commercial imaging (e.g., Digitalglobe, GeoEye), but communications (e.g., Iridium, Globalstar, Orbcomm) is growing

LEO has high spatial density and relative velocity, but “self-cleaning” at lower altitudes

Density is highest between 700 and 900 km

Page 6: COMSTAC Risk Management Working Group October 28, 2009 Chris Kunstadter XL Insurance chris.kunstadter@xlgroup.com

Page 6 Apr 21, 2023

Geostationary Orbit Debris Issues

Most commercial (and insured) communications satellites are in geostationary orbit (GEO)

150 insured satellites (out of 300 active commercial satellites) are insured for $16 billion

Lower spatial density and relative velocity, but limited area and no “self-cleaning”

Due to “libration points” (points of stable drift orbit), GEO satellites tend to concentrate at 75° east and 105° west longitude if not maintained

~1,000 tracked objects in GEO, and many more untracked

~175 tracked objects “trapped” at libration points

Page 7: COMSTAC Risk Management Working Group October 28, 2009 Chris Kunstadter XL Insurance chris.kunstadter@xlgroup.com

Page 7 Apr 21, 2023

Insured Values in GEOIn 10° increments, as of June 1, 2009

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,5001

80°-

19

19

0°-

20

20

0°-

21

21

0°-

22

22

0°-

23

23

0°-

24

24

0°-

25

25

0°-

26

26

0°-

27

27

0°-

28

28

0°-

29

29

0°-

30

30

0°-

31

31

0°-

32

32

0°-

33

33

0°-

34

34

0°-

35

35

0°-

36

00

0°-

01

01

0°-

02

02

0°-

03

03

0°-

04

040

°-0

50

°

050

°-0

60

°

060

°-0

70

°

07

0°-

08

08

0°-

09

09

0°-

10

10

0°-

11

11

0°-

12

12

0°-

13

13

0°-

14

14

0°-

15

15

0°-

16

16

0°-

17

17

0°-

18

($ m

illio

ns)

Amer

ica

sEM

E

AAsi

a/

Pacifi

c

L L

L = location of libration points (positions of stable drift orbit)

Page 8: COMSTAC Risk Management Working Group October 28, 2009 Chris Kunstadter XL Insurance chris.kunstadter@xlgroup.com

Page 8 Apr 21, 2023

Who’s Doing What?

NASA, ESA – developing guidelines and policy

IADC – inter-governmental co-ordination

UN COPUOS – treaty oversight

USSTRATCOM/JSPOC – tracking objects

Launch vehicle and satellite operators – refining operational procedures

Technical services companies – developing tracking and analysis tools

FAA AST/COMSTAC – investigating effects on commercial space

Page 9: COMSTAC Risk Management Working Group October 28, 2009 Chris Kunstadter XL Insurance chris.kunstadter@xlgroup.com

Page 9 Apr 21, 2023

Space Law and Debris Issues

International space treaties were developed in the ’60s and ’70s, when governments dominated space activity Saw liability as a citizen of one state being injured by the space activity of

another state, and resolving liability issues through diplomatic channels (i.e., state-to-state claims)

Space activity is now heavily commercial Space treaties facilitate resolution of disputes over liability, but no obligation to go

via convention

Issues in the event of a collision between two objects Determination of cause and proof of liability are difficult

If purchased, first party insurance would typically cover the owner of a damaged satellite for the asset (subject to policy terms)

Loss of revenue, consequential loss, incidental damages, loss of market might be recoverable through other party’s TPL insurance

Page 10: COMSTAC Risk Management Working Group October 28, 2009 Chris Kunstadter XL Insurance chris.kunstadter@xlgroup.com

Page 10 Apr 21, 2023

Q&A

Thank you!