Computing Assingment Problem 3,4 and 5

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/13/2019 Computing Assingment Problem 3,4 and 5

    1/5

    `

    Title: Computing Assignment using ProII

    Name: Ahmad Tarmizi Abd Wahab

    Registration Number: 110231839

    Date: 27th

    April 2013

    Problem 3

    Flow diagram for this problem is shown below:

    The phase envelope plot for both Soave-Redlich-Kwong (SRK) and Peng-Robinson (PR) methods are

    shown below:

    a) Soave-Redlich-Kwong (SRK)

    PH1

    S1

    1.0

    1.0

    100.030

    F

    PSIA

    LB-MOL/HR

    Temperature, F

    -270.0 -210.0 -150.0 -90. 0 -30. 0 30.0

    Pressure,psia

    0

    300.0

    600.0

    900.0

    1200.0

    1500.0

    PHASE ENVELOPE PH1

    S1

    CriticalP oint

    S1- L/F=0.050000

    S1- L/F=0.010000

  • 8/13/2019 Computing Assingment Problem 3,4 and 5

    2/5

    `

    b) Peng-Robinson (PR)

    The cricondentherm, cricondenbar and critical points for the three streams for both methods are asfollows:

    a) Soave-Redlich-KwongStream Conditions Temperature (F) Pressure (PSIA)

    1

    Cricondentherm 30.11 614.00

    Cricondenbar -24.18 1319.66

    Critical point -88.44 893.86

    1

    (5% liquid fractions)

    Cricondentherm -68.99 913.59

    Cricondenbar -73.93 986.18

    Critical point -88.44 893.84

    1

    (1% liquid fractions)

    Cricondentherm -16.72 823.34

    Cricondenbar -43.06 1195.29

    Critical point -88.44 893.86

    Temperature, F

    -2 70. 0 -2 1 0. 0 -1 5 0. 0 -90 .0 -30 .0 3 0. 0

    Pressure,psia

    0

    300.0

    600.0

    900.0

    1200.0

    1500.0

    PHASE ENVELOPE PH1

    S1

    CriticalPoint

    S1-L/F=0.050000

    S1-L/F=0.010000

  • 8/13/2019 Computing Assingment Problem 3,4 and 5

    3/5

    `

    b) Peng-RobinsonStream Conditions Temperature (F) Pressure (PSIA)

    1

    Cricondentherm 26.12 581.40

    Cricondenbar -28.49 1278.89

    Critical point -88.44 893.52

    1

    (5% liquid fractions)

    Cricondentherm -70.28 905.36

    Cricondenbar -75.42 977.47

    Critical point -88.45 893.44

    1

    (1% liquid fractions)

    Cricondentherm -20.33 790.23

    Cricondenbar -46.47 1162.99

    Critical point -88.44 893.51

    Based on Met Office: UK climate: Winter 2011/12, the UK mean temperature for the winter was

    3.3C1 which is equivalent to 38F. Cricondentherm is the maximum temperature by which the

    condensation takes place. Therefore, by referring to the cricondentherm temperatures for all stream

    conditions for both methods, the mean temperature of 38F does not fall below any of those values.

    Hence, condensation will not happen.

    The worst case scenario that could happened is where the temperature during the winter falls below

    the cricondentherm and the liquids condensed, which one way to prevent such phenomenon from

    happening is to apply insulator along the pipe. By using this method, it will prevent the contact from

    the surrounding temperature with the pipe.

    Cricondenbar does not take into account since, the liquid stream is already in gas state, which is

    natural gas, therefore, a phase change of gas to gas is will not happen.

    In comparison, the Peng-Robinson method gives a lower value for cricondentherm, cricondenbar

    and also critical point for both temperature and pressure.

    1http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/climate/uk/summaries/2013/winter.Last accessed 27

    thApril 2013

    http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/climate/uk/summaries/2013/winterhttp://www.metoffice.gov.uk/climate/uk/summaries/2013/winterhttp://www.metoffice.gov.uk/climate/uk/summaries/2013/winterhttp://www.metoffice.gov.uk/climate/uk/summaries/2013/winter
  • 8/13/2019 Computing Assingment Problem 3,4 and 5

    4/5

    `

    Problem 4

    The flow diagram for this problem is shown below:

    Condenser and reboiler duties required to maintain the specified methanol purity and recovery are -

    0.0189 MKcal/hr and 0.0190 MKcal/hr respectively.

    The column diameter required to meet specifications is

    The specifications are met since the calculated values are the same as in the specified values.

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    1

    15T1

    S1

    78.1

    760.0

    1435.000

    C

    MM HG

    KG-MOL/HR

    S3

    78.1

    760.0

    1433.959

    C

    MM HG

    KG-MOL/HR

    S2

    65.1

    760.0

    1.041

    C

    MM HG

    KG-MOL/HR

  • 8/13/2019 Computing Assingment Problem 3,4 and 5

    5/5

    `

    The design diameters of the trays are shown as follows:

    Tray Design Diameter (mm)

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14