Upload
nilusingh2k7
View
927
Download
7
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Learning Organizations & Organizational Transformation
Sharon Glazer, Ph.D.
Preparing for Next Week & Yavneh
WS graduates to speak on WSPrep for Sim. 9.1Discuss written presentation of Yavneh results
Effective TeamsInformal atmosphereClear purpose; tasks understood and
acceptedTask-relevant discussions; good listening Participation: free expression of ideas &
feelingsOpen communicationCivilized disagreement/conflict around ideasSelf-assessingConsensus decision-makingShared leadershipClear roles and work assignments
Team Building ActivitiesActivities related to one or more individualsActivities oriented to the group’s operations
and behaviorsTask accomplishmentsTeam relationshipsOrganization processes
Activities affecting the group’s relationship with the rest of the organization
Types of TeamsGroups reporting to the same managerGroups involving people with common goalsTemporary groups formed to accomplish a
specific, one-time task Groups consisting of people whose work
roles are interdependentGroups with no formal links but whose
collective purpose requires coordinationAll teams are groups, not all groups are
teams.
Types of Team BuildingFamily group diagnostic meeting
A set of activities designed to understand the current structure, process, and effectiveness of the team
Family group team-building meetingA set of activities designed to address
and improve a specific aspect of team functioning
GroupthinkExercise
RolesRole Analysis TechniqueRole Negotiation
(Go to Word Example)
Comprehensive OD Interventions
Large Group InterventionsFuture Search Conference (Weisbord)Open-Space Meeting (Owen)Open System Planning (Beckhard)Confrontation Meeting (Beckhard)Real-Time Strategic Change (Jacobs)The Conference Model (Axelrod)
Future Search Conferences
4-6 committee members plan~50-60 reps of whole system/~10 groups(Environmental Appreciation)
Changes; Probable future**System Analysis: Self, company, society
History (patterns and meaning)Present (ext. & int. factors shaping future)Future
*Integration of system and environmentConstraintsStrategies & action plans
Large-Group Meeting Assumptions
• Organization members’ perceptions play a major role in environmental relations.
• Organization members must share a common view of the environment to permit coordinated action toward it.
• Organization members’ perceptions must accurately reflect the condition of the environment if organizational responses are to be effective.
• Organizations cannot only adapt to their environment but also proactively create it.
Large-Group Method Application Stages
Preparing for the large-group meetingIdentify compelling meeting themeSelect appropriate stakeholders to
participateDevelop relevant tasks to address meeting
themeConducting the meeting
Open Space Methods Open Systems Methods
Following up on the meeting outcomes
Open Space MethodsSet the conditions for self-organizing
Announce the theme of the sessionEstablish norms for the meetings
Volunteers create the agendaCoordinate activity through
information postings
Open Systems Methods• Map the current environment facing the org.• Assess org’s responses to environ. expectations.• Identify the core mission of the organization.• Create a realistic future scenario of environmental
expectations and organization responses.• Create an ideal future scenario of environmental
expectations and organization responses.• Compare the present with the ideal future &
prepare an action plan for reducing discrepancy.
Confrontation Meeting1-day meetingcross-section of management; high cohesion and
trustStep 1: Climate setting – Goals, ground rulesStep 2: Data gathering – heterogeneous group of
6-8 people (bosses and subordinates separate)Step 3: Information sharingStep 4: Prioritizing & Action Planning (regroup by
functional team)Step 5: Follow-up by top managementStep 6: Progress Review
Grid OD- A Normative Model
Organization-level approach that advocates a “one best way” to develop organizations
Built on research exploring organization effectiveness
Cornerstone of the model is a belief that the best managerial style emphasizes both a ‘concern for people’ and a ‘concern for task/production’
5-10 years to implementImproved performance; reduced costs;
managers rated more highly
Grid OD programPrephase 1: select managers who will become
instructorsPhase 1: Grid Seminar to all managers of the org; self-
awareness (mgrl style, p-s, comm. skills)Phase 2: Teamwork development: analyze team culturePhase 3: Intergroup development: analysis of ideal
intergroup relationships and share Phase 4: Developing Ideal strategic corporate model:
Defining excellence at the topPhase 5: Implementing Ideal Strategic modelPhase 6: Systematic Critique: Measure results
Real Time Strategic Change
3-day large-group eventNew strategic directionLeadership team developed draft strategyLeadership team receives feedbackKey ingredients:
Identify/clarify important issuesAgree on purpose of change effortWho needs to be involvedInfluence over strategy developmentInfo. needed to do quality workProcesses for supporting real-time strat. changes
Stream AnalysisBased on Porras & Robertson model:
Social factorsTechnologyPhysical settingOrganizing arrangements
Actions are OD interventions directed at solving core problems
Changes in the above lead to beh. changes & org. improvements
Survey FeedbackStep 1: Top mgmt involved in planningStep 2: data collected from all membersStep 3: Data fed back to top execs and then
down through the hierarchy (“interlocking chain of conferences”)
Step 4: recipients of feedback (a) interpret results, (b) plan constructive changes (c) plan how to introduce results to next lower level
Effective Feedback Session
Accept data as validAccept responsibility for problems
identifiedCommit to solving problems
Cultural Analysis
Values
Assump-tions
Artifacts
Corporate CultureStrategy-Culture Fit (strategic
alignment)Strategy: actions to achieve major
objectivesCulture: provides shared values,
norms; answers “why things are done the way they are.”
Learning OrganizationsReduce organizational layersInvolve all employees in continuous self-
directed learningCreate knowledge for actionConstant readiness for change (some org.
change, without considering why)Continuous planning (up-down; bottom-up)Improvised Implementation (experiment)Action Learning
Third-Wave OrganizationsFlexibleCreativeInnovative
Organization Transformation
Abrupt, drastic change to total structure
Directive not participative