4
STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE MACOMB COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT Jeffrey Dean Saxon Plaintiff, v. John M. Chmura Defendant. _______________________________________________________ __________/ Jeffrey Dean Saxon, Pro Se ADDRESS Warren Mi 48089 PHONE _______________________________________________________ __________/ EMERGENCY COMPLAINT FOR MANDAMUS TO DISQUALIFY THE JUDGE Pursuant to MCR 2.003(B), MCR 7.206 and MCL 600.4401, et al. File no.___________________

Complaint for Mandamus

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

This is the Complaint for Mandamus, which I helped write up. This stems from a case involving Jeffrey Dean Saxon who was fined $4000 by the city of Warren, Michigan based on civil citations for his property. More information: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ByE2lWEiEu0

Citation preview

Page 1: Complaint for Mandamus

STATE OF MICHIGAN

IN THE MACOMB COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT

Jeffrey Dean Saxon

Plaintiff,

v.

John M. Chmura

Defendant.

_________________________________________________________________/

Jeffrey Dean Saxon, Pro Se

ADDRESS

Warren Mi 48089

PHONE

_________________________________________________________________/

EMERGENCY COMPLAINT FOR MANDAMUS

TO DISQUALIFY THE JUDGE

Pursuant to MCR 2.003(B), MCR 7.206 and MCL 600.4401, et al.

The Plaintiff states:

1. Citations were presented to the Plaintiff on August 25, 2010, regarding violations in the

city code.

2. The Plaintiff challenged those citations.

File no.___________________

Page 2: Complaint for Mandamus

3. Judge John M. Chmura ruled in favor of the city on September 29, 2010, incurring a large

fine for the Plaintiff.

4. The Judge lacked jurisdiction to impose fines, not withstanding fines that far exceeded

constitutional limitations and lawful limitations of fines allowed.

5. The Plaintiff filed a Motion to Reconsider [exhibit A] on Oct 12 2010 and a Motion to

Disqualify Judge Chmura [exhibit B] on Oct. 15 2010.

6. The Defendant summarily dismissed all of the Plaintiff’s Motions on Oct. 21 2010.

7. The Defendant refused to follow lawful procedure regarding the Plaintiff’s Motion to

Disqualify when the Plaintiff inquired about the dismissal of the Motion to Disqualify.

8. The proper procedures for Disqualification are laid out in MCR 2.003(B), which the

Defendant unlawfully chose to ignore.

9. The Defendant’s Court Administrator, Robert Curtis, informed the Plaintiff that the

Defendant would not be granting the Motion to Disqualify, that the Motion to Disqualify had

been summarily dismissed and that the Defendant would not be sending it to a higher court,

in accordance with MCR 2.003(B). see Affidavit of Events of October 21, 2010 [exhibit C].

10. The Plaintiff is not barred from any action of a Writ of Mandamus.

Plaintiff has attached his Brief in Support of Complaint for Mandamus to this Complaint.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff moves the court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to inquire into the matter

of the judicial disqualification of Judge Chmura and for Defendant to show cause why he did not

comply with law and that following said hearing the lawful process of appeal be ordered and

granted in accordance with MCR 2.003(B).

Page 3: Complaint for Mandamus

_____________________________

JEFFREY DEAN: SAXON

ADDRESS

Warren Mi 48089

PHONE

Michigan State Republic )

) Jurat

Macomb County )

On the ______ day of ____________, 20_____, Jeffery-Dean, family of Saxon personally appeared

before me and proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person whose

name is subscribed hereto and acknowledged to me that he executed the same under

asseveration, and accepts the facts thereof. Subscribed and affirmed before me this day.

Witness my hand and seal this ______ day of __________________, 20_____,

_________________________________________________________

Notary Signature

My commission expires:

___________________________________