CompetitionLaw project

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/25/2019 CompetitionLaw project

    1/24

    1

    A PA PROJECTROJECTRREPORTEPORT

    OONN

    CCOMPETITIONOMPETITIONLLAWAWPPOLICYOLICYANDAND

    IINTELLECTUALNTELLECTUALPPROPERTYROPERTYLLAWSAWS

    Project Submitted to: Md. Atif KhanProject Submitted to: Md. Atif Khan

    Project Submitted byProject Submitted by

    Pallavi JoshiPallavi Joshi

    Roll No. 89Roll No. 89

    Semeste !IISemeste !II

    HIDAYATULLAH ATI!AL LA" UI#$%SITYHIDAYATULLAH ATI!AL LA" UI#$%SITY

    $" %AIPU% &'.(.)$" %AIPU% &'.(.)

  • 7/25/2019 CompetitionLaw project

    2/24

    2

    RESEARC" MET"ODOLO#Y AND SOURCE O$RESEARC" MET"ODOLO#Y AND SOURCE O$

    DATADATA

    The re*earcher ha* ado+ted the doctrina, methodo,o-y and the +a+er i* de*cri+tie in

    nature. The author ha* main,y re*orted to *eera, on,ine artic,e* for the com+,etion of the

    +roject. Ho/eer the documentary materia, in the form of boo0* and artic,e* in the ,ibrary

    ha* a,*o been referred to for the *ubject matter at hand.

  • 7/25/2019 CompetitionLaw project

    3/24

    3

    "YPOT"ESIS

    The author ha* ta0en the fo,,o/in- a* the hy+othe*i* for the re*earch +a+er:

    Intellectual property laws are not anti competitive in nature

  • 7/25/2019 CompetitionLaw project

    4/24

    4

    RESEARC" %UESTIONS

    The author ha* formu,ated the fo,,o/in- t/o re*earch 1ue*tion*:

    2. "hether IP ,a/* come under the +urie/ of Antitru*t ,a/*3

    4. If *o5 then /hether the t/o are in conf,ict3

  • 7/25/2019 CompetitionLaw project

    5/24

    5

    C"APTERISATION

    The IP% and 'om+etition La/ Interface6666666666666666...7

    Ty+e* of %e*traint*666666666666666666666666628

    'om+etition La/ %e-u,ation of IP% acro** 9uri*diction6666666666...22

    The T%IPS A-reement66666666666666666666666...2

    The IP% and 'om+etition La/ Interface in India6666666666666.48

    'onc,u*ion6666666666666666666666666666.44

    ;ib,io-ra+hy666666666666666666666666666..4

  • 7/25/2019 CompetitionLaw project

    6/24

    6

    MODE O$ CITATION

    An attem+t ha* been made by the author to fo,,o/ the ;,ue ;oo0 form of citation. Any

    tran*-re**ion* to the *ame i* re1ue*ted to be con*idered a* ty+o-ra+hica, error*.

  • 7/25/2019 CompetitionLaw project

    7/24

    7

    T "E IPR AND COMPETITION LAW INTER$ACE

    The *im+,e ha,,mar0 of com+etition ,a/ i* the +rotection of tho*e +rinci+,e* and +ractice*

    /hich enab,e the efficient functionin- of mar0et*. A natura, concomitant to thi* objectie

    i* ma0in- certain that incumbent enter+ri*e* do not en-a-e in anticom+etitie +ractice* to

    the detriment of the mar0et. Ho/eer5 the a++,ication of com+etition ,a/ *tandard* i* due to IP% ho,der* bein- -ranted *tatutory ri-ht* to e**entia,,y

    contro, acce** to the inte,,ectua, +ro+erty and char-in- mono+o,y rent* for the u*e of the

    IP%*

  • 7/25/2019 CompetitionLaw project

    8/24

    8

    a++reciab,e trend5 e*+ecia,,y in IP%

  • 7/25/2019 CompetitionLaw project

    9/24

    9

    Ho/eer5 at a conce+tua, ,ee,5 the ,ine* are c,ear. The ,imited mono+o,ie* -ranted by

    IP% are not per se anticom+etitie or e=ce**ie,y e=+,oitatie

  • 7/25/2019 CompetitionLaw project

    10/24

    10

    TYPES O$ RESTRAINTS

    Thi* interface bet/een IP% and com+etition ,a/ ha* eo,ed *eera, ty+e* of re*traint* on

    com+etition. "hi,e no one ha* *ou-ht to contend that ,icen*in- a-reement* are per se

    anticom+etitie5 the focu* of the*e re*traint* i* ty+ica,,y a ,icen*in- a-reement /hich

    cou,d ader*e,y affect com+etition by artificia,,y diidin- mar0et* amon- enter+ri*e* and

    +o**ib,y im+edin- the dee,o+ment of ne/ -ood* and *erice*.

    More *+ecifica,,y5 the +henomenon of e=c,u*ie ,icen*in-5 manife*ted throu-h *eera,

    uni,atera, mar0et tactic* by enter+ri*e* *uch a* tie

  • 7/25/2019 CompetitionLaw project

    11/24

    11

    COMPETITION LAW RE#ULATION O$ IPRs

    ACROSS JURISDICTIONS

    EUROPE

    The IP%com+etition ,a/ interface find* e=+re**ion in Artic,e B2 of the $' TreatyB/hich

    di*cu**e* the com+atibi,ity of IP% ,icen*in- a-reement* /ith com+etition +o,icy. In thi*

    re-ard5 the +o,icy of the $' ha* eo,ed from a ,ibera,5 +ermi**ie a++roach in ear,ier

    year* to a midd,e +ha*e ba*ed on forma, interention5 to the +rea,ent5 more economic*