39
Competing for ADVANTAGE 1 Chapter 9 Acquisition and Restructuring Strategies PART III CREATING COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE

Competing for Advantage

  • Upload
    mandy

  • View
    112

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Competing for Advantage. Chapter 9 Acquisition and Restructuring Strategies. PART III CREATING COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE. The Strategic Management Process. Merger and Acquisition Strategies. Very popular strategies Especially cross-border acquisitions Offensive and defensive motives - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Competing for    Advantage

Competing for ADVANTAGE

1

Chapter 9Acquisition and Restructuring Strategies

PART IIICREATING COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE

Page 2: Competing for    Advantage

The Strategic Management Process

Page 3: Competing for    Advantage

Merger and Acquisition Strategies

Very popular strategies Especially cross-border acquisitions Offensive and defensive motives

Problematic High failure rates Complex strategic decisions Impacted by economic volatility Uncertain returns

Page 4: Competing for    Advantage

Mergers, Acquisitions, and Takeovers – The Differences

Key Terms Merger

Strategy through which two firms agree to integrate their operations on a relatively co-equal basis

Acquisition Strategy through which one firm buys a controlling, 100 percent interest in another firm with the intent of making the acquired firm a subsidiary business within its portfolio or melding it with another division

Page 5: Competing for    Advantage

Mergers, Acquisitions, and Takeovers – The Differences

Key Terms Takeover

Special type of acquisition strategy wherein the target firm did not solicit the acquiring firm's bid

Hostile takeover Unfriendly takeover strategy that is unexpected and undesired by the target firm

Page 6: Competing for    Advantage

Reasons for Acquisitions

Page 7: Competing for    Advantage

Sources of Market Power

Size of the firm Resources and

capabilities to compete in the market

Share of the market

Page 8: Competing for    Advantage

Types of Acquisitions to Increase Market Power

Horizontal Acquisitions

Vertical Acquisitions Related Acquisitions

Page 9: Competing for    Advantage

Horizontal Acquisitions

Acquisition of a company competing in the same industry

Increase market power by exploiting cost-based and revenue-based synergies

Character similarities between the firms lead to smoother integration and higher performance

Page 10: Competing for    Advantage

Vertical Acquisitions

Acquisition of a supplier or distributor of one or more products or services

Increase market power by controlling more of the value chain

Page 11: Competing for    Advantage

Related Acquisitions

Acquisition of a firm in a highly related industry

Increase market power by leveraging core competencies to gain a competitive advantage

Page 12: Competing for    Advantage

Entry Barriers that Acquisitions Overcome

Economies of scale in established competitors

Differentiated competitor products

Enduring relationships and product loyalties between customers and competitors

Page 13: Competing for    Advantage

Cross-Border Acquisitions

Acquisitions made between companies with headquarters in different countries

Page 14: Competing for    Advantage

New Product Development

Significant investments of a firm’s resources are required to: develop new products

internally introduce new products into

the marketplace Profitability or adequate

returns on investments are not certain

Page 15: Competing for    Advantage

Increase Speed to Market

Acquisitions are used for rapid market entry critical to

successful competition in the highly uncertain and complex global environment faced by

firms today.

Page 16: Competing for    Advantage

Reshape the Firm’s Competitive Scope

Acquisitions quickly and easily: Change a firm's portfolio of

businesses Establish new lines of products in

markets where the firm lacks experience

Alter the scope of a firm’s activities

Create strategic flexibility

Page 17: Competing for    Advantage

Learn and Develop New Capabilities

Acquisitions are used to: Gain capabilities that the firm

does not possess Broaden the firm’s knowledge

base Reduce inertia

Page 18: Competing for    Advantage

Problems in Achieving Acquisition Success

Page 19: Competing for    Advantage

Integration Challenges

Melding two disparate corporate cultures Working relationships Financial and control systems Uncertainty for acquired firm’s employees

Retaining crucial knowledge held by key personnel

Merging acquired capabilities into internal processes and procedures

Page 20: Competing for    Advantage

Private Synergy

Occurs when the combination and integration of acquiring and acquired firms' assets yields capabilities and core competencies that could not be developed by combining and integrating the assets of any other companies.

Possible when the two firms' assets are complimentary in unique ways.

Yields a competitive advantage that is difficult to understand or imitate.

Page 21: Competing for    Advantage

Transaction Costs Direct expenses

Legal fees Charges from investment bankers who

complete due diligence Indirect expenses

Managerial time to evaluate target firms and complete negotiations

Loss of key managers after an acquisition Additional costs

Managerial time in meetings Resources used to integrate processes

Page 22: Competing for    Advantage

Due Diligence

Process through which a potential acquirer evaluates a target firm for acquisition

Associates the purchase price of an acquisition to an estimated, realistic achievable value

Page 23: Competing for    Advantage

Large or Extraordinary Debt

Increases the likelihood of bankruptcy

Can lower the firm’s credit rating

Precludes needed investments in activities that contribute to long-term success (opportunity costs)

Page 24: Competing for    Advantage

Too Much Diversification

Overwhelming information processing requirements

Overuse of financial controls to evaluate unit performance

Decline in internal innovation

Page 25: Competing for    Advantage

Management Acquisition Activities

Searching for viable acquisition candidates

Completing effective due-diligence processes

Preparing and conducting negotiations

Managing integration processes after acquisition is completed

Page 26: Competing for    Advantage

Firm Becomes Too Large

Key Terms Bureaucratic controls

Formalized supervisory and behavioral rules and policies designed to ensure decision and action consistency across different units of a firm

Page 27: Competing for    Advantage

Attributes and Results of Successful Acquisitions

Page 28: Competing for    Advantage

Restructuring

Key Terms Restructuring

Strategy through which a firm changes its set of businesses or financial structure

Page 29: Competing for    Advantage

Restructuring –Three Strategies

Downsizing Downscoping Leveraged Buyouts

Page 30: Competing for    Advantage

Downsizing

Key Terms Downsizing

Strategy that involves a reduction in the number of a firm's employees (and sometimes in the number of operating units) that may or may not change the composition of businesses in the company's portfolio

Page 31: Competing for    Advantage

Downscoping

Key Terms Downscoping

Strategy of eliminating businesses that are unrelated to a firm's core businesses through divesture, spin-off, or some other means

Page 32: Competing for    Advantage

Leveraged Buyouts

Key Terms Leveraged buyouts (LBOs)

Restructuring strategy whereby a party buys all of a firm's assets in order to take the firm private (or no longer trade the firm's shares publicly)

Private equity firms Firms that facilitate or engage in taking public firms or business units of public firms private

Page 33: Competing for    Advantage

Characteristics of Leveraged Buyouts

High debt Significant risk Related downscoping Managerial incentives

Page 34: Competing for    Advantage

Restructuring and Outcomes

Page 35: Competing for    Advantage

ETHICAL QUESTION

What are the ethical issues associated with takeovers, if any? Are mergers more or less ethical

than takeovers? Why or why not?

Page 36: Competing for    Advantage

ETHICAL QUESTIONOne of the outcomes associated with

market power is that the firm is able to sell its good or service above competitive levels. Is it ethical for firms to pursue

market power? Does your answer to this question differ by

the industry in which the firm competes? For example, are the ethics of pursuing

market power different for firms producing and selling medical equipment compared with those producing and selling sports

clothing?

Page 37: Competing for    Advantage

ETHICAL QUESTIONWhat ethical considerations are

associated with downsizing decisions? If you were part of a corporate

downsizing, would you feel that your firm had acted unethically?

If you believe that downsizing has an unethical component to it, what

should firms do to avoid using this technique?

Page 38: Competing for    Advantage

ETHICAL QUESTION

What ethical issues are involved with conducting a robust due-diligence

process?

Page 39: Competing for    Advantage

ETHICAL QUESTIONSome evidence suggests that there is a direct relationship between a firm’s size and the level of compensation its top executives receive. If this is so,

what inducement does this relationship provide to top-level

managers? What can be done to influence this relationship so that it serves shareholders’ best interests?