Upload
micah
View
30
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Competing For Advantage. Part I – Strategic Thinking Chapter 2 – Strategic Leadership. Managerial Discretion. 1) Discretion – latitude for action or decision making How much influence do you really have? 2) Hubris – excessive pride, leading to a feeling of invincibility. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Competing For Advantage
Part I – Strategic ThinkingChapter 2 – Strategic Leadership
Managerial Discretion
1) Discretion – latitude for action or decision making
How much influence do you really have?
2) Hubris – excessive pride, leading to a feeling of invincibility
Constraints on Decision Making
Decision-Making Biases
Reliance on previously formed beliefsFocus on limited objectivesExposure to limited decision alternatives Insensitivity to outcome probabilities Illusion of controlReliance on a limited set of heuristics or
rules of thumb
Top Management Teams
Group composed of the CEO and key managers who are responsible for setting the direction of the firm and formulating and implementing its strategies
Factors that Influence the Effectiveness of Top Management Teams
Top management team heterogeneity
The CEO and top management team power
Executive succession processes
Heterogeneous Top Management Team
Introduces a variety of perspectives Has a greater propensity for strong
competitive action Tends to "think outside of the box," leading to
more creative decision making, innovation, and strategic change
Offers various areas of expertise to identify environmental opportunities, threats, or the need for change
Promotes debate
Heterogeneous Top Management Team Challenges
Cohesion
Communication
Comprehensive examination of threats and opportunities
The CEO and Top Management Team Power
CEO Duality - CEO also serves as chair of the board of directors to achieve power relative to the board
Independent Board Leadership Structure – the structure in which the board's ability to monitor top-level managers' decisions and actions (particularly in terms of financial performance) is enhanced by employing two different people to serve as CEO and board chair
CEO Duality
Is more common in the United StatesOccurs most often in the largest firms Is criticized for causing poor
performance and slow response to change
Top Management Power
Members of top management can use their social and business ties with directors
Powerful CEOs can appoint members of the top management team or other sympathetic associates to serve on the board
CEO tenure
Executive Succession Processes
Process can be internal or external
Benefits of Internal Labor Market
Continuity
Continued commitment
Familiarity
Reduced turnover
Retention of "private knowledge"
Benefits of External Labor Market
Since tenure with the same firm is thought to reduce innovation, outsiders can bring
diverse knowledge bases
new social networks
….which may offer new synergies and new competitive advantages
Effect of CEO Succession and Top Management Team on Strategy
What is strategic effectiveness?
Consistent, long-termgoals and objectivesConsistent, long-termgoals and objectives
Reflects and understandingof the environment
Takes resources into consideration
Effectivelyimplemented
StrategicEffectiveness
(fit)
Strategic Vision vs. Mission
A strategic vision concerns “wherewe are going” or ”what do we want to be.” Markets to be pursued Future product/ market/
customer/ technology focus
Kind of company management is trying to create
The mission statement focuses on its “who we are and what we do” Current product and
service offerings Customer needs being
served Technological
and businesscapabilities
Mission Statements Boundaries of the current business Fundamental purpose that sets it apart from
other firms of its type Conveys
Who we are, What we do, and Why we are here
Objectives Turns mission into performance outcomes Organizations produce what is measured Long and Short term
Control Systems
Financial Controls focus on short-term financial outcomes produce risk-averse managerial decisions
Strategic Controls focus on the content of strategic actions encourage decisions that incorporate
moderate and acceptable levels of risk
Current financial results are “lagging indicators” reflecting results of past decisions and actions—good profitability now does not translate into stronger capability for delivering better financial results later
However, meeting or beating strategic performance targets signals growing competitiveness & strength in the marketplace, thus developing the capability for better financial performance in the years ahead
Good strategic performance is thus a “leading indicator” of a company’s capability to deliver improved future financial performance
Leading versus Lagging Indicators
Controls in Balanced Scorecard Framework