2
Summer 2002 1 Technical Brief P owl-V ac™ vacuum circuit breakers and metal-clad switchgear use a primary insulation system of cycloaliphatic epoxy. This insula- tion has given excellent results in the eight years we first intro- duced Powl-Va c™, but we still have customers who request porcelain. Powell is far from alone in using cycloaliphatic epoxy insulation. The material has been in common use in Europe for a generation, and other U.S users include Westinghouse, S&C, and Square D. It is especially interesting to see the first two of these companies using cycloaliphatic epoxy . A few years ago, both were strong proponents of porcelain insulation. Although there are many formulations of cycloaliphatic epoxy and a number of varieties of porcelain, each of which has its own specific quali- ties and parameters, one can make a number of general comparisons. First, in the physical area, the following relationships are typical: Cycloaliphatic epoxy (“cyclo”) weighs less than 70 percent of  porcelain’s weight. The thermal coefficient of ex pansi on of cycl o is 1 / 20 that of porcelain. The tensile strength of cyclo is about 1 1 times that of glazed porcela in. The comp ressi on streng th of cyclo is four to si x times that of gl azed porcelain. The flexu ral str ength of cyclo is 16 to 18 times that of glaze d porcel ain. The Izod impact stre ngth, unno tched, is ab out the same as glaz ed porcelain. • Dimen sional an d shape contr ol is much easier in cyclos than in por ce- lain. While the repairability of cyclos i s limited, porcelain is unrepairable. In the electrical area, one will find: The dielectri c constant of cyclo is only about two-thir ds that of porcelain. The tempe ratur e class of porce lain is much hig her than that of cyclo,  but cyclo mixtures with temperature classes of 105°C or 130°C are readily available. The track re sistanc e of cyclo is slig htly less than tha t of porcel ain. The water absorptio n of cyclo is slightly gr eater tha n that of porcel ain  but is still in the range of 0.2 of one percent. Subject:  Compari son of Porcelain and Cycloaliphatic Epoxy Insulation by Baldwin Bridger, PE Powell Electrical Manufactur- ing Co. (retired) Finally, cyclo exhibits excellent resistance to common industrial chemicals, is readily washable, and has excellent erosion resistance and weathering properties. In summary , we believe that the excellent physical properties of cyclo make it the insulating mate- rial of choice in spite of some small sacrifice in electrical properties. This is especially true for applica- tions requiring great strength un- der severe dynamic loading, such as support insulators in circuit  breakers and switchgear . Reprinted with permission of Powell Electrical Manufacturing Co. Baldwin Bridger, PE, is retired Techni- cal Director of Powell Electrical Manufac- turing Co., Houston, Texas. He has worked as an engineer and engineering manager in the design of low- and medium-voltage switchgear since 1950, first at GE and since 1973 at Powell. He is a Fellow of IEEE and a past president of the IEEE Industry Ap- plications Society

Comparison of Porcelain and Cycloaliphatic Epoxy Insulation.pdf

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Comparison of Porcelain and Cycloaliphatic Epoxy Insulation.pdf

7/27/2019 Comparison of Porcelain and Cycloaliphatic Epoxy Insulation.pdf

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/comparison-of-porcelain-and-cycloaliphatic-epoxy-insulationpdf 1/1

Summer 2002 1

Technical Brief 

Powl-Vac™ vacuum circuit breakers and metal-clad switchgear use

a primary insulation system of cycloaliphatic epoxy. This insula-

tion has given excellent results in the eight years we first intro-

duced Powl-Vac™, but we still have customers who request porcelain.Powell is far from alone in using cycloaliphatic epoxy insulation.

The material has been in common use in Europe for a generation,and other U.S users include Westinghouse, S&C, and Square D. It isespecially interesting to see the first two of these companies usingcycloaliphatic epoxy. A few years ago, both were strong proponentsof porcelain insulation.

Although there are many formulations of cycloaliphatic epoxy and anumber of varieties of porcelain, each of which has its own specific quali-ties and parameters, one can make a number of general comparisons.

First, in the physical area, the following relationships are typical:

• Cycloaliphatic epoxy (“cyclo”) weighs less than 70 percent of 

porcelain’s weight.• The thermal coefficient of expansion of cyclo is 1/20 that of porcelain.

• The tensile strength of cyclo is about 11 times that of glazed porcelain.

• The compression strength of cyclo is four to six times that of glazedporcelain.

• The flexural strength of cyclo is 16 to 18 times that of glazed porcelain.

• The Izod impact strength, unnotched, is about the same as glazedporcelain.

• Dimensional and shape control is much easier in cyclos than in porce-lain.

• While the repairability of cyclos is limited, porcelain is unrepairable.

In the electrical area, one will find:

• The dielectric constant of cyclo is only about two-thirds that of porcelain.

• The temperature class of porcelain is much higher than that of cyclo, but cyclo mixtures with temperature classes of 105°C or 130°C arereadily available.

• The track resistance of cyclo is slightly less than that of porcelain.

• The water absorption of cyclo is slightly greater than that of porcelain but is still in the range of 0.2 of one percent.

Subject: 

Comparison of Porcelainand Cycloaliphatic Epoxy Insulation

by Baldwin Bridger, PE Powell Electrical Manufactur-

ing Co. (retired)

Finally, cyclo exhibits excellentresistance to common industrialchemicals, is readily washable, andhas excellent erosion resistanceand weathering properties.

In summary, we believe that theexcellent physical properties of 

cyclo make it the insulating mate-rial of choice in spite of some smallsacrifice in electrical properties.This is especially true for applica-tions requiring great strength un-der severe dynamic loading, suchas support insulators in circuit breakers and switchgear.

Reprinted with permission of PowellElectrical Manufacturing Co.

Baldwin Bridger, PE, is retired Techni-cal Director of Powell Electrical Manufac-turing Co., Houston, Texas. He has workedas an engineer and engineering managerin the design of low- and medium-voltageswitchgear since 1950, first at GE and since1973 at Powell. He is a Fellow of IEEE anda past president of the IEEE Industry Ap-plications Society