12
JOHN KARBASSI MD , HANBING ZHOU, MD, PHILIP AURIGEMMA, MD, SCOTT PASCAL, BA, BRIAN BURROUGHS, MD, PHD, JOHN WIXTED, MD, ABHAY PATEL, MD Department of Orthopedics and Physical Rehabilitation University of Massachuetts Medical School Worcester, Massachusetts Comparison of Locking Compression Plate versus Non-locking Plate with Compression Screw for First Metatarsophalangeal Fusion

Comparison of Locking Compression Plate versus … Twelve matched pairs of cadaver feet were obtained for this study. Six matched pairs were used to compare the standard 2.7 mm non-locking

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Comparison of Locking Compression Plate versus … Twelve matched pairs of cadaver feet were obtained for this study. Six matched pairs were used to compare the standard 2.7 mm non-locking

J O H N K A R B A S S I M D , H A N B I N G Z H O U , M D , P H I L I P A U R I G E M M A , M D , S C O T T P A S C A L , B A ,

B R I A N B U R R O U G H S , M D , P H D , J O H N W I X T E D , M D , A B H A Y P A T E L , M D

D e p a r t m e n t o f O r t h o p e d i c s a n d P h y s i c a l R e h a b i l i t a t i o n U n i v e r s i t y o f M a s s a c h u e t t s M e d i c a l S c h o o l

W o r c e s t e r , M a s s a c h u s e t t s

Comparison of Locking Compression Plate versus Non-locking Plate with Compression Screw for First Metatarsophalangeal Fusion

Page 2: Comparison of Locking Compression Plate versus … Twelve matched pairs of cadaver feet were obtained for this study. Six matched pairs were used to compare the standard 2.7 mm non-locking

Disclosures

All co-author disclosures are in the Final AOFAS Mobile App.

I have a potential conflict with this presentation: Implants for this study were donated via a research

grant by Synthes, Inc.

Page 3: Comparison of Locking Compression Plate versus … Twelve matched pairs of cadaver feet were obtained for this study. Six matched pairs were used to compare the standard 2.7 mm non-locking

Introduction

Traditionally the treatment of end stage first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint arthritis has been arthrodesis.

Despite the wide array of fusion constructs, reports of nonunion in the literature range from 0-30%.

Potential complications of this procedure include infection, nonunion, delayed union, malunion, metatarsal stress fractures, and local pain arising from the hardware.

For these reasons, clinicians continue to seek fixation methods that will allow patients to have faster fusion times and earlier weight bearing.

Page 4: Comparison of Locking Compression Plate versus … Twelve matched pairs of cadaver feet were obtained for this study. Six matched pairs were used to compare the standard 2.7 mm non-locking

Introduction

The strongest fixation method reported in the literature up to this point has been application of a dorsal plate with a compression lag screw.

Recently, there has been development of new compression/locking plate systems for midfoot and forefoot joints.

This study compares the biomechanical strength of an MTP compression/locking plate construct to the known standard of a dorsal non-locking plate and a compression lag screw.

Page 5: Comparison of Locking Compression Plate versus … Twelve matched pairs of cadaver feet were obtained for this study. Six matched pairs were used to compare the standard 2.7 mm non-locking

Methods

Twelve matched pairs of cadaver feet were obtained for this study.

Six matched pairs were used to compare the standard 2.7 mm non-locking dorsal plate with a 3.5 mm lag screw to the dorsal 2.7 mm locking compression plate with a lag screw.

The remaining six matched pairs were used to compare the non-locking dorsal plate with a 3.5 mm compression screw to the dorsal 2.7 mm locking compression plate only.

Page 6: Comparison of Locking Compression Plate versus … Twelve matched pairs of cadaver feet were obtained for this study. Six matched pairs were used to compare the standard 2.7 mm non-locking

Schematic Diagram of Study Design

Page 7: Comparison of Locking Compression Plate versus … Twelve matched pairs of cadaver feet were obtained for this study. Six matched pairs were used to compare the standard 2.7 mm non-locking

Comparison of Fusion Constructs

Page 8: Comparison of Locking Compression Plate versus … Twelve matched pairs of cadaver feet were obtained for this study. Six matched pairs were used to compare the standard 2.7 mm non-locking

Methods

A material testing system (MTS) machine was used to apply loads to the MTP joints which allowed for measurement of displacement and stiffness of the various constructs.

The initial stiffness of the fixation was calculated from the force-displacement curves and defined as the initial slope of these curves.

The initial contact position of the load cell and the end position at maximum load were recorded.

Page 9: Comparison of Locking Compression Plate versus … Twelve matched pairs of cadaver feet were obtained for this study. Six matched pairs were used to compare the standard 2.7 mm non-locking

Results

The data from the MTS machine was transmitted to a desktop computer for statistical analysis.

The locked/compression plate construct had less joint displacement and higher stiffness than the control (p<0.05).

Locked plate with lag screw construct was stiffer than control (p<0.05), but displacement was not statistically significant.

Page 10: Comparison of Locking Compression Plate versus … Twelve matched pairs of cadaver feet were obtained for this study. Six matched pairs were used to compare the standard 2.7 mm non-locking

Discussion

This study compares a novel locked/compression plating system for MTP fusion to the gold standard of non-locking plate and lag screw fixation.

The results suggest that locked/compression plating alone is the strongest and stiffest construct for first MTP fusion.

Page 11: Comparison of Locking Compression Plate versus … Twelve matched pairs of cadaver feet were obtained for this study. Six matched pairs were used to compare the standard 2.7 mm non-locking

Discussion

The results of this biomechanical study have implications with respect to determining the most cost-effective and efficacious method of foot fusion.

Prospective studies in the future will better answer the question of clinical outcome superiority among fusion constructs.

Page 12: Comparison of Locking Compression Plate versus … Twelve matched pairs of cadaver feet were obtained for this study. Six matched pairs were used to compare the standard 2.7 mm non-locking

References

Bennett G., and Sabetta J. First Metatarsalphalangeal Joint Arthrodesis: Evaluation of Plate and Screw Fixation. Foot and Ankle Int., 30: 752-757, 2009.

Ellington J.K, Jones C., Cohen B., Davis H., Nickisch, F., Anderson R. Review of 107 Hallux MTP Joint Arthrodesis Using Dome-Shaped Reamers and a Stainless-Steel Dorsal Plate. Foot and Ankle Int., 31: 385-390, 2010.

Neufeld S., M.D, Parks B., Naseef G., Melamed E., Schon, L. Arthrodesis of the First Metatarsophalangeal Joint: A Biomechanical Study Comparing Memory Compression Staples, Cannulated Screws, and a Dorsal Plate. Foot and Ankle Int., 23: 97-101, 2002.

Politi, J ., Hayes J.., Njus, G., Bennett, G. , and Kay, D. First Metatarsal-Phalangeal Joint Arthrodesis: A Biomechanical Assessment of Stability. Foot and Ankle Int. 24: 332-337, 2003.

Yee, G., Lau J. Current Concepts Review: Hallux Rigidus. Foot and Ankle Int., 29: 637-646, 2008.